Blogs 4 Brownback

February 12, 2008

Islamists Hate Love

Hate LoveThey admit as much themselves:

Saudi Arabia has asked florists and gift shops to remove all red items until after Valentine’s Day, calling the celebration of such a holiday a sin, local media reported Monday.

“As Muslims we shouldn’t celebrate a non-Muslim celebration, especially this one that encourages immoral relations between unmarried men and women, ” Sheikh Khaled Al-Dossari, a scholar in Islamic studies, told the Saudi Gazette, an English-language newspaper.

Every year, officials with the conservative Muslim kingdom’s Commission for the Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice clamp down on shops a few days before February 14, instructing them to remove red roses, red wrapping paper, gift boxes and teddy bears. On the eve of the holiday, they raid stores and seize symbols of love.

The virtue and vice squad is a police force of several thousand charged with, among other things, enforcing dress codes and segregating the sexes. Saudi Arabia, which follows a strict interpretation of Islam called Wahhabism, punishes unrelated women and men who mingle in public.

These deviants despise all human emotion, and don’t mind telling you so. I can understand having a problem with fornication and homosexuality, as such behavior is genuinely sinful against the True Faith of Christianity. But to besmirch a Christian like Saint Valentine in the name of “religion” is an occult practice, quite predictable when one is talking about a moon god idolatry like Islam but completely inappropriate in light of the revealed truths of Christianity.

Saudi Arabia is our enemy, just as surely as Syria, Iran, and Iraq prior to our recent missionary efforts. None of these nations are inhabited by people who share our values, our beliefs, or our basic human emotions. All they know are hatred and fear for God and God’s works. Like our own liberals, they despise humanity and the better angels of humanity’s nature. They’d rather beat a child for praying to Jesus than hug that child. They’d rather behead a woman for showing her hair than gently chide her for failing to strap her chest down. Their values are consistent with their ancient Persian overlords, whereas ours hail from Christ, and from the noble Greek tradition of freedom typified by the Greek resistance to Persia (as recently shown in the priceless national treasure of a film, “300”).

We are at war with Islam. We have always been at war with Islam, even before the Muslim charlatans took on that name with their pretence of monotheism. We will always be at war with Islam, until God triumphs and Satan is cast into a lake of fiery perdition along with all his works and his followers. Muslims have two choices before them: the path of Christianity, or the path of damnation. By turning their backs on Saint Valentine, they turn their back on Christ Himself, and choose the latter course.

(BTW, it’s fitting that the Communist News Network is griping about the loss of the color red. For dissimilar reasons, they too have rejected Christianity and chosen the pathways of damnation. They shall suffer in accordance with their crimes.)

Praise God, and cast aside Satan and all his wickedness!

37 Comments »

  1. The Saudis hate love. Man that is just sick.

    All the Saudis are doing is just mindlessly following the rules some old book that doesn’t apply to modern society. As a Christian I find that kind prevision of religion into a rules mongering posturing match just disgusting.

    Comment by BJ Tabor — February 12, 2008 @ 1:23 pm | Reply

  2. “All the Saudis are doing is just mindlessly following the rules some old book that doesn’t apply to modern society.”

    Hypocrite.

    Comment by Tinlion — February 12, 2008 @ 1:40 pm | Reply

  3. Also parody confirmed, again

    Comment by Tinlion — February 12, 2008 @ 1:46 pm | Reply

  4. Tinlion @ “Hypocrite.”

    How so? I don’t follow the Koran.

    Comment by BJ Tabor — February 12, 2008 @ 2:07 pm | Reply

  5. Well, you obsessively follow another book that’s some hundreds of years old and doesn’t apply to modern society. Hypocrite may not be the best, most exact word, but you are calling out a religion for doing something that Christianity does too.

    Comment by Tinlion — February 12, 2008 @ 2:39 pm | Reply

  6. BAAAAAAWWWWWW

    Comment by The Nobody — February 12, 2008 @ 3:00 pm | Reply

  7. Cry me a river baptist faggots.

    Comment by The Nobody — February 12, 2008 @ 3:01 pm | Reply

  8. moon god idolatry like Islam

    They have the same God as you, idiot. It’s written into the Koran itself that Jesus Christ was indeed a messiah and an avatar of God. Muhammad was visited by (I believe it was)Gabriel, who gave him word of God to unite those whom Christ could not and did not reach– the people of the middle east. He preached unity, peace, inner strength, and the abolition of false gods(polytheism).

    All they know are hatred and fear for God and God’s works.

    It’s funny ’cause all you guys do here is preach hatred and try to strike fear of God into everyone you meet.

    They’d rather beat a child for praying to Jesus than hug that child.

    Marty McPain enjoys beating his children in public.

    We are at war with Islam. We have always been at war with Islam, even before the Muslim charlatans took on that name with their pretence of monotheism. We will always be at war with Islam, until God triumphs and Satan is cast into a lake of fiery perdition along with all his works and his followers. Muslims have two choices before them: the path of Christianity, or the path of damnation. By turning their backs on Saint Valentine, they turn their back on Christ Himself, and choose the latter course.

    Islam is led by God and Muhammad, not Satan. Or do you believe the Jews are led by Satan as well?

    Christians all over the world stand against St. Valentine’s Day, as it promotes love and romance. It promotes children to seek out and fornicate with others.

    Why should they honor St. Valentine’s Day? Do you celebrate Passover?

    Comment by Dio Brando — February 12, 2008 @ 3:02 pm | Reply

  9. As a Christian I find that everyone should believe everything I say even though I can’t use correct grammar lol dongs.

    Comment by The Nobody — February 12, 2008 @ 5:06 pm | Reply

  10. If you can’t find a related picture to go with your blog, don’t include one. This isn’t 4chan; you don’t need an opening picture.

    Emo kids trying to get attention is NOT related to Islamists refusing to celebrate a holiday completely fabricated by the card and candy companies. Buying corporeal gifts to sway lovers? How is that Christian is the slightest?

    I don’t blame them at all for getting rid of such a corporate perversion of one man’s good deeds.

    Comment by Elephant Bones — February 13, 2008 @ 2:49 am | Reply

  11. There are Islamic 5th columnists active in the US too. Otherwise, how do you explain this headline?

    http://www.wired.com/culture/lifestyle/commentary/sexdrive/2007/10/sex_drive1005

    G whizz! St Valentine would be trembling in his his grave if he knew about this.

    Comment by Ho Hum — February 13, 2008 @ 6:15 am | Reply

  12. “They have the same God as you, idiot. It’s written into the Koran itself that Jesus Christ was indeed a messiah and an avatar of God. Muhammad was visited by (I believe it was)Gabriel, who gave him word of God to unite those whom Christ could not and did not reach– the people of the middle east. He preached unity, peace, inner strength, and the abolition of false gods(polytheism).”

    Do you expect me to believe that moonbat propoganda?

    “St. Valentine would be trembling in his his grave if he knew about this.”

    I’m not defending everything done on his day, but at least most of it revolves around love and affection, not fornication and homosexuality. Only a Communist or a Muslim would object to this use of the color red. If you people can’t see that, you probably can’t see the monitor you’re typing at, either.

    Comment by Sisyphus — February 13, 2008 @ 9:20 am | Reply

  13. Tinlion @ Well, you obsessively follow another book that’s some hundreds of years old and doesn’t apply to modern society. Hypocrite may not be the best, most exact word, but you are calling out a religion for doing something that Christianity does too.

    That’s different, we Christian follow The Bible, which was written by God who is timeless.

    Comment by BJ Tabor — February 13, 2008 @ 10:34 am | Reply

  14. ‘That’s different, we Christian follow The Bible, which was written by God who is timeless.’

    Ok, in the interests of the equality agenda, how do we steal Allah’s watch?

    Comment by Ho Hum — February 13, 2008 @ 12:44 pm | Reply

  15. “Do you expect me to believe that moonbat propoganda?”
    Translation: I’m not going to read to Koran because then I’ll be proven wrong.

    Comment by Elephant Bones — February 13, 2008 @ 12:51 pm | Reply

  16. Ho Hum @ “Ok, in the interests of the equality agenda, how do we steal Allah’s watch?”

    That was a racist thing to say.

    Comment by BJ Tabor — February 13, 2008 @ 2:20 pm | Reply

  17. Their values are consistent with their ancient Persian overlords, whereas ours hail from Christ, and from the noble Greek tradition of freedom typified by the Greek resistance to Persia (as recently shown in the priceless national treasure of a film, “300″).

    Yep, we knew that Greek Sex turns you on…..ge jump some more Christian choirboys!!!

    Comment by Y6799 — February 13, 2008 @ 2:25 pm | Reply

  18. Btw, as long as you B4B trolls follow your holy handguns and grenades, I can only conclude that you do not know what love actually is. Now go beat your females into submission again, thanx for reading anyway.

    Comment by Y6799 — February 13, 2008 @ 4:38 pm | Reply

  19. What is love?

    Comment by Elephant Bones — February 13, 2008 @ 4:46 pm | Reply

  20. @ Y6799 — February 13, 2008 @ 4:38 pm

    ‘your holy handguns and grenades’

    this poor soul seems to be suffering from the evils of being brought up on those sinful Bruce Wayne films

    Comment by Ho Hum — February 13, 2008 @ 5:20 pm | Reply

  21. @ BJ Tabor — February 13, 2008 @ 2:20 pm

    ‘That was a racist thing to say.’

    Islam is not a race. Now if I had said steal a dumb American President’s watch…

    Comment by Ho Hum — February 13, 2008 @ 5:22 pm | Reply

  22. Do you expect me to believe that moonbat propoganda?

    Well, if you were to read it, you’d soon find that the book makes mention– even praises– of Jesus. It is the same God, the only difference is that where the Jews were handed down their scripture, where the Christians were handed theirs, so to were the Muslims given their own set. Unlike the Jews, however, they recognize and honor Jesus.

    That’s different, we Christian follow The Bible, which was written by God who is timeless.

    How is that any different? Because you attach your personal thoughts to it? It is just as valid for others and their beliefs, as it is to you. They believe they have heard the word of God, you believe you have heard the word of God. You cannot offer any proof against it without referring to either the Bible, or making subjective claims. Basically, this means that you’d fall back on “but the bible says so, and it is the word of God”. They’d echo the same thing.

    I could also ask you WHICH Bible you follow. There’s more than one version, easily. King James Bible, anyone?

    I’m not defending everything done on his day, but at least most of it revolves around love and affection, not fornication and homosexuality. Only a Communist or a Muslim would object to this use of the color red. If you people can’t see that, you probably can’t see the monitor you’re typing at, either.

    It is what you make of it. Al Capone suggested it be a day of red, by painting a wall with the blood of some rival mobsters.

    Communists don’t exist in any strong force except in China(and they’ve a red flag to begin with), Cuba(which is leaning away from Communism, heading more toward socialism), and a few Asian nations.

    As for the whole “we abhor this observance”, that’s just that culture and religion’s version of conservatism. If anything, you should almost understand them, as they want to keep things strictly by their holy book, just as you want every to remain as it was in biblical times.

    Comment by Dio Brando — February 13, 2008 @ 6:02 pm | Reply

  23. sinful Bruce Wayne films

    >>>Bruce Wayne films
    >>Bruce Wayne
    >Bruce

    Comment by Dio Brando — February 13, 2008 @ 6:04 pm | Reply

  24. ‘He preached unity, peace, inner strength, and the abolition of false gods(polytheism)’

    you missed out polygyny

    So, on that basis, if we’re really about keeping up with the biblical times, are you therefor saying Mormons are righter than Baptists and Catholics then?

    Comment by Scunnered, O'Aberdein — February 13, 2008 @ 7:03 pm | Reply

  25. oops…..

    ‘He preached unity, peace, inner strength, and the abolition of false gods(polytheism)’

    you missed out polygyny

    So, on that basis, if we’re really about keeping up with the biblical times, are you therefor saying Mormons are righter than Baptists and Catholics then?

    Comment by Ho Hum — February 13, 2008 @ 7:04 pm | Reply

  26. you missed out polygyny

    Polygamy within Islam is all due to interpretation(not all follow it). It is connected to the culture.

    “Polygyny was practiced by many of the patriarchs in the Hebrew Bible and Old Testament including Abraham, Jacob, Moses, David and King Solomon”


    So, on that basis, if we’re really about keeping up with the biblical times, are you therefor saying Mormons are righter than Baptists and Catholics then?

    Isn’t that what is desired? The programming of all culture to biblical times? Or is it just the want to persecute others?

    Am I saying Mormons are more “in the right”? No. At least, in a solid sense. If taken in the context of “all religious conservatives wish to convert all to exact biblical word to the very ink”, then whoever is the strictest to its own members would be “right”.

    Comment by Dio Brando — February 13, 2008 @ 8:19 pm | Reply

  27. “The programming of all culture to biblical times? Or is it just the want to persecute others?”
    Sisyphus is totally all for the second one.

    Comment by Elephant Bones — February 13, 2008 @ 10:22 pm | Reply

  28. “all religious conservatives wish to convert all to exact biblical word to the very ink”

    OK. The Sermon on the Mount (think Matthew chpts 5/6 or so) runs through a range of points which go……’you have heard it said (Old Testament reference)….but I say to you (something new)’…..eg eye for an eye cf turning the other cheek

    These are opposites. So, if we assume that the proposition above is a fair attribution to the original writer and his beliefs, the question for both protagonists here is, which opposite is the more authoritative if you to have to choose one, even if that choice only has to be exercised merely to prove that you have at least two functioning neurons to rub against each other to help you acknowledge that opposites are not the same?

    Comment by Ho Hum — February 14, 2008 @ 2:58 am | Reply

  29. Since you Nazis (especially the writer of this article)share the same radical kill-die-hell logic as extremist Islamists (for not every Muslim is as insane as you or Osama Bin Laden) I can only recommend a one on one fight with them, and leave the rest of the world and citizins out of it.
    Go for it SixSixSixiphus, go wrestle a terrorist man to man……and leave us sane people out of it (You both have “God on your side”, have fun.

    Comment by y7699 — February 14, 2008 @ 10:03 am | Reply

  30. (and do not fornicate with their sons or on their sheep)

    Comment by y7699 — February 14, 2008 @ 10:04 am | Reply

  31. which opposite is the more authoritative if you to have to choose one

    They choose only that which allows for more oppression. This is why they have abandoned the true way of the Christian, and instead chosen a life of persecution and genocide. There is no charity with them. They love no neighbor. They strike upon any and all who contain even the slightest bit of difference.

    Note that this is the way of B4B.

    Comment by Dio Brando — February 14, 2008 @ 2:20 pm | Reply

  32. It is a well known fact that Islam adult males are closet bear furries. That alone warrants execution.

    It’s a shame we lost Turkey as an ally. They’re Muslims, but they hate Islam, which is a plus. They did not accept Jesus’ love, and as such must be punished. The Greeks have always hated them anyways.

    Comment by bobcorker — February 14, 2008 @ 3:25 pm | Reply

  33. ‘Islam adult males are closet bear furries;’

    You can just see the newspaper hoardings, can’t you?. ‘Care Bears go down a bomb when Toys ‘R us open new branch in Riyadh’

    Comment by Scunnered, O'Aberdein — February 14, 2008 @ 4:37 pm | Reply

  34. It is a well known fact that Islam adult males are closet bear furries. That alone warrants execution.

    Proof, retard?

    It’s a shame we lost Turkey as an ally. They’re Muslims, but they hate Islam, which is a plus. They did not accept Jesus’ love, and as such must be punished. The Greeks have always hated them anyways.

    LOL WUT

    Comment by Dio Brando — February 14, 2008 @ 5:03 pm | Reply

  35. How so? I don’t follow the Koran.

    Koran, Thora, Bible….
    Differrent names, same [stuff].

    Comment by PG — February 15, 2008 @ 2:17 pm | Reply

  36. “As Muslims we shouldn’t celebrate a non-Muslim celebration, especially this one that encourages immoral relations between unmarried men and women,

    So, in other words, you have no problem with premarital sex? Or are you simply stating that your views are always right, unless they’re held by someone who isn’t Christian?

    Also, you are against womens’ rights. Did you know conservative Muslims are also against womens’ rights?

    Comment by L — March 7, 2008 @ 10:48 am | Reply

  37. Whoops, forgot the link.

    Comment by L — March 7, 2008 @ 10:53 am | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a reply to Dio Brando Cancel reply