Since Adam has taken to pooping on other people’s blogs to badmouth us, I thought he would like his very own open thread to spew whatever bile he sees fit.
He’s been spending some time over at The Daily Brownbacker in a childish attempt to drive a wedge between Brownback supporters and the official blog of the Brownback campaign. Can you say childish? Of course you can!
“Hi, I’m Adam Nelson, and I love cookies! Yummy!”
He’s barged in on a number of threads over there begging Billy Valentine to criticize us. What a baby. Billy Valentine, who obviously has much more important things to do than review websites for this misguided Canadian, has wisely ignored him.
Let’s take a look after the jump.
Update: This has been re-Christened “The Cookie Monster Thread.”
Adam Nelson Says:
July 27th, 2007 at 6:51 amHello, Sorry to barge into this forum, but I was wondering if somebody could answer a question for me. What is your stance on the Blogs 4 Brownback website, or the similar Baptists 4 Brownback blog?
I know that this is the official blog of Sam Brownback, but I was wondering what the general consensus of those two sites is around here.
If this was answered in a previous post, please direct me to it. Sorry again for derailing this post. Thanks!
Adam Nelson Says:
July 27th, 2007 at 12:42 pmWhy does nobody answer my question?
Adam Nelson Says:
July 27th, 2007 at 1:02 pmPlease can SOMEBODY just give me an answer?
Adam Nelson Says:
July 27th, 2007 at 1:51 pmI base from your unwillingness to answer that these guys embarrass you. But if you were truly embarrassed, you would quickly state that they have nothing to do with you. Your failure to point this out obviously indicates that you do, in fact, share in some of B4B’s insane ideas, like angelectrons and a flat earth.
Which just makes me glad that Brownback doesn’t have a snowball’s chance at the presidency.
Finally, I just had to respond. I regret it now, because Adam went on and on as always, polluting The Daily Brownbacker with nonsense that is of no interest to them. Typical.
Psycheout Says:
July 27th, 2007 at 2:40 pmWhy are you squawking about a tempest in a teapot, Adam? We’re nice to you over on our blog. This is the Official Blog of the Brownback for President Campaign. They don’t do website reviews. Maybe you’re looking for stumbleupon.
We all support Senator Brownback’s candidacy in our own ways. Mr. Valentine does a superb job as Brownback’s official blogger. He is under no obligation to answer your pestering questions. You won’t be satisfied whatever his answer might be.
I think that’s why you’re being ignored. This blog is about Senator Brownback’s campaign for President, not about the relative value of various blogs.
I apologize for Adam and I’m sorry for taking this way off topic. If you want to delete this entire discussion, I wouldn’t blame you. It’s pointless.
And Bryan, if you’re interested in doing a review of Senator Brownback’s book, we’d be glad to publish it on our website. Contact us if you are interested.
Anyway, have a great weekend, Brownbackers! Ames is getting close. Go Brownback!
Psycheout Says:
July 27th, 2007 at 2:41 pmOh, and I’d like to state for the record that The Daily Brownbacker has nothing to do with Blogs 4 Brownback. Satisfied, Adam?
Of course he was not.
So the floor is yours. Welcome to the Adam Nelson show. Be sure to bring along a basket of rotten fruit. You’re going to need it. Take it away, Adam!
— Psycheout
Blogs 4 Brownback 
No offense to you, Psycheout, but I believe that watching paint dry would be more entertaining.
Have you seen the Ralph Lauren Vintage Masters line? Chesapeake Sunset is a lovely color. Very organic.
Your thoughts?
Comment by Mrs. T.D. Gaines-Crockett — July 27, 2007 @ 7:53 pm |
That was really pretty rude, Adam, putting those nice people on the spot like that. We’re just a group of people who want to see Senator Brownback elected, and we all have our own opinions and viewpoints on various matters. Maybe those opinions and viewpoints converge with Senator Brownback on some topics, and on other topics, they likely diverge wildly. It’s irrelevant, really. We’re not part of his official campaign, we’re just a group of supporters doing the best that we feel we can.
Candidates are not going to agree with every word out of the mouth of every supporter. That’s a given. I think your badgering of the nice people over at the Daily Brownbacker was really pretty out of line. It’s up to you, of course, but I do think that you owe them an apology.
Comment by Lyssie — July 27, 2007 @ 7:53 pm |
Mrs. T.D., that IS a nice color. What would you think of Duke Red, with white beadboard wainscotting, in a dining room?
Comment by Lyssie — July 27, 2007 @ 7:56 pm |
Lyssie,
I think great minds think alike. You do know that red in a dining room increases the appetite and is flattering to every skin tone. Now that is what I call the the perfect setting for a dream dinner party on any budget.
Comment by Mrs. T.D. Gaines-Crockett — July 27, 2007 @ 8:01 pm |
Sister Taffy, if he spends his time in here, he won’t be peddling lies and pooping elsewhere in our otherwise legitimate comment threads. Shhhh. He might be listening.
And no offense taken. You know that! 🙂
Comment by Psycheout — July 27, 2007 @ 8:04 pm |
Adam? You have the floor. Go ahead. Rant about what you think is important. Like Dennis Kook-Spinach, we’re all ears.
Comment by Psycheout — July 27, 2007 @ 9:12 pm |
Kook-spinach? Really? (Then again, I shouldn’t poke fun, as I know I wouldn’t be able to do any better.)
Comment by Lyssie — July 27, 2007 @ 9:18 pm |
Adam, thanks for coming by. Seriously.
We may not agree but name one other blog that allows this level of freedom of discourse.
Comment by relee — July 27, 2007 @ 10:27 pm |
So I saw the Simpsons Movie tonight.
Comment by Brandon Explosion — July 27, 2007 @ 11:58 pm |
Thanks for filling in for Adam, Brandy.
Normally we can’t get him to shut up. Now he won’t say a darn thing.
Comment by Psycheout — July 28, 2007 @ 12:05 am |
Silence is Golden. That is why you never see the parent of a deaf, mute child looking stressed out. I won’t mention any names because that would be rude, but there are some children here whose parents are probably the most tired looking, worn out people you will ever see. I feel sorry for those people and pray for them to survive until the day they can kick their chick out of the nest lock, stock, and barrel.
Comment by Mrs. T.D. Gaines-Crockett — July 28, 2007 @ 5:48 am |
Adam is a coward. He enjoys threatening America with Canada’s Army, which he claims in spite of overwhelming contrary evidence won WWII singlehanded. But threaten him, not even with a real-life war, but with a decent online flamewar, and he runs away screaming. Typical.
The man is unhinged. But that’s par for the course in the “reality-based” community. It’s who these kooks are.
Comment by Sisyphus — July 28, 2007 @ 7:42 am |
Hey, cool, my own dedicated thread! I’m honoured that I received such infamy from this site 🙂
Is this all because I exposed you on the Daily Brownbacker? Honestly, do you think it matters? Your site is on a website on the internet that anybody can access.
But since you ask, there IS something I would like to talk about. Do any of you own pets?
Comment by Adam Nelson — July 28, 2007 @ 10:26 am |
And no, Sisyphus, I never said Canada won WW2 single-handedly. I said that Russia practically beat Hitler single-handedly.
Comment by Adam Nelson — July 28, 2007 @ 10:29 am |
“Do any of you own pets?”
Why, Adam, are you planning to kill them? FYI I have security cameras around my house so I am not afraid of the likes of you.
Comment by Mrs. T.D. Gaines-Crockett — July 28, 2007 @ 10:31 am |
Uh, no, I don’t plan on killing your pets. What a funny question from someone who suggests that everyone who doesn’t believe what she believes should be killed.
The question stands: do any of you have pets?
Comment by Adam Nelson — July 28, 2007 @ 10:46 am |
Fine, another topic then. Who’s music do you like more: Beethoven or Dvorak?
Comment by Adam Nelson — July 28, 2007 @ 11:38 am |
I like Handel’s Messiah.
Comment by Helen Bock — July 28, 2007 @ 12:03 pm |
“Silence is Golden. That is why you never see the parent of a deaf, mute child looking stressed out. I won’t mention any names because that would be rude, but there are some children here whose parents are probably the most tired looking, worn out people you will ever see. I feel sorry for those people and pray for them to survive until the day they can kick their chick out of the nest lock, stock, and barrel.”
I take it you’re not a mother, which is probably for the best, because I can’t see you showing love for anything. That’s a pretty cold thing to say.
Comment by Brandon Explosion — July 28, 2007 @ 12:35 pm |
I have two cats and a doggie.
The reason Mrs. T.D. Gaines-Crockett avoided your question with a comeback is because she was born with the inability to show any amount of affection for a living creature.
Comment by Brandon Explosion — July 28, 2007 @ 12:37 pm |
Dear Explosive Brandon,
I am indeed a mother, of a beatiful daughter, Rebecca. She is smart, articulate, respectful, and a very devout Christian. I coould not ask for a better child. May the lord bless you with one of your own someday who is half as wonderful as my own. As too I am a pet lover. I have two Standard poodles whom I just adore and three Rotties that I am also very fond of.
In fact, I embrace and cherish all of God’s creatures, though not their sins, which is biblically directed by God, look it up.
I might add that you being a cat person comes as no surprise. People tend to adopt pets that suit their personalities best so a cat seems like the perfect match for you. May you and your four-legged friends live long, healthy lives.
Comment by Mrs. T.D. Gaines-Crockett — July 28, 2007 @ 12:49 pm |
They’re not just mine. They’re family pets.
Comment by Brandon Explosion — July 28, 2007 @ 12:53 pm |
Rebecca,
I am so sorry for what you have to put up with on a day to day basis. Good luck!
Comment by Brandon Explosion — July 28, 2007 @ 12:54 pm |
I used to have three cats, but G-d decided to take one of them to kitty heaven. So now I have two. Why do you ask?
Comment by Psycheout — July 28, 2007 @ 1:04 pm |
Did you happen to notice that Salon referred to you as a moron, Adam? See also Update 3 to the Marijuana Ruins Your Mind post.
Comment by Psycheout — July 28, 2007 @ 1:08 pm |
“And no, Sisyphus, I never said Canada won WW2 single-handedly. I said that Russia practically beat Hitler single-handedly.”
With help from their Canadian allies, who won Italy and Normandy all by their lonesomes. Also, who held off half the Wehrmacht at Bastogne. The 101st Canadian Airborne Division.
Even for loonbat moonbats, you’re pretty unhinged, Adam.
Comment by Sisyphus — July 28, 2007 @ 1:25 pm |
The question stands: do any of you have pets?”
Why? Do you want to molest them after your gorilla “girl”-friend is extinct?
Comment by Sisyphus — July 28, 2007 @ 1:26 pm |
Sisyphus, why are you so touchy? Do you have daddy issues? I think you and Gaines-Crockett need a big hug (maybe Psycheout, too, but he’s quite capable of intelligent conversation). The fact that you try to insult me at every turn just goes to show how sad your life is. And the fact that you need to call people “moonbats” or “LIEberals” to emphasize your political opinion is even more sad.
I was often told that bullies are just cowards at heart. Thanks for proving my point.
To answer my own question, I prefer Dvorak. Not only is he the sole founder of American music (aside from African-influenced music), but his 9th symphony and New World quartet are simply astounding.
And about pets: Gaines-Crockett is a good example. You have poodles. Do you think those animals existed since the beginning of time, or that they were bred in France as gun dogs and hunting dogs? To save time, the latter is correct. They were domesticated, as were all dogs, from wolves. So, a new species was created in a short time by selective breeding. Guess what, Gaines-Crockett: your poodles are the showfloor model for evolution!! Oh, the irony 🙂
Comment by Adam Nelson — July 28, 2007 @ 2:13 pm |
Sisyphus, have you EVER made a good point without trying to sling mud at somebody?
Now I am waiting for Gaines-Crockett(copyright) or Sis to try to tell us that poodles have existed since the dawn of man, and that they somehow managed to survive in the wild until now.
Comment by Brandon Explosion — July 28, 2007 @ 2:27 pm |
Evolution is, in very general terms, the ability of life forms to slowly adapt to their environment. Tell me how exactly this is evil. Show me how religious beliefs and evolution are mutually exclusive. You can’t, because they’re not.
Comment by Brandon Explosion — July 28, 2007 @ 2:48 pm |
This thread has to be the first time he’s managed to restrain himself to one comment. Come on Adam, you finally got your’ wish and your’ punk ass is the center of attention because you know every adult in the world is fascinated by what you have to say. Time to put up or shut.
Comment by BJ Tabor — July 28, 2007 @ 3:16 pm |
I have a cat named Cat, a black pug named Clyde, a fawn pug named Lola, and some mixed dog named Lucy.
Hmmm, I haven’t heard much of Dvorak, but I’m not picky when it comes to instrumental music. (I’m usually not a fan of marches, but Americans We, His Honor, and the Thunder and Blazes are cool. The last one is just fun to play.) And Beethoven has a really cool set of clarinet/bassoon duets…….
Sisyphus, what evidence do you have of anyone here having a gorilla “girl-friend?” Are we once again on the subject of baseless claims? What a shocker. Psycheout and Lyssie are quite capable of a good conversation, why do you and Crockett go as such?
And Adam, I commend thee on your very own thread.
Comment by La Mona — July 28, 2007 @ 3:20 pm |
Show me how religious beliefs and evolution are mutually exclusive.
Brandon,
You are an unthinking idiot. Now let me explain to why; one of the central premises of Christianity is a God is perfect and The Bible is His message to His creation. Now if the Geneses is wrong and evolution is right that means ether God lied, or God doesn’t know, or God did not write The Bible. Any of those would show that God, as Christianity defines Him, doesn’t exist so therefore there Jesus is not the Son of God and there is no salvation. This obviously is an unacceptable to a Christian. Since this should be clear to anyone with a basic knowledge of this and any mental competence this shows why you Brandon are a unthinking fool.
Have you ever considered taking the time to read what other people write or say before opening your fat mouth? My bet is no.
Comment by BJ Tabor — July 28, 2007 @ 3:27 pm |
Just because God wrote the Bible doesn’t mean it has to be entirely factual. A lot of it is allegorical. Revelations, like many others, is allegorical, and Genesis is a story, nothing more. A divinely inspired story, maybe, but a story nonetheless. Just because God inspired it doesn’t mean it had to actually happen; it could have been his way of teaching us life lessons through stories.
Comment by Adam Nelson — July 28, 2007 @ 4:55 pm |
As you all likely know, I’ve got two Airedales.
As far as the whole evolution thing is concerned, my opinion on the matter (for what it’s worth) is that God knew that His creatures would effect change upon their environments, and so planned right from the get-go for these creatures to adapt to these changed environments. And yes, I’m certain that there are inconsistencies and holes that can be poked into that theory, but overall, it is one that just feels right to me. (Nobody ever said faith was logical, folks.)
Comment by Lyssie — July 28, 2007 @ 8:20 pm |
La Mona, you named your cat, Cat?
I suppose…it’s not like they come when you call them anyway, right?
Oh, and FYI, the dogs’ names are Buttercup and Westley. Yes, I’ve watched The Princess Bride too many times to count.
Comment by Lyssie — July 28, 2007 @ 8:30 pm |
Lyssie, while I agree with some of your argument, you mention that there are holes in the theory. The fact of the matter is, there are no holes in the theory. There are certain lines of evidence that are incomplete (ie the fossil record has missing links), but nobody uses the ancient fossil record to prove OR disprove evolution as a whole. We are sure of it happening because we see it.
Bacteria evolving to match our increasingly potent antibiotics is evolution at work. Another good example is our domestication of animals: by selectively breeding animals, we have created thousands of species that never existed until we made them. We created artificial evolution there.
I’m sorry to break it to you, but anybody who says evolution is full of holes is just blowing hot air. Gravity has more “holes” than evolution, and scientists are actually more sure of evolution than gravity.
Comment by Adam Nelson — July 28, 2007 @ 9:12 pm |
I was in the 101st Abn. (in Vietnam not Bastogne) and never heard of any Canadians in it.
La Mona,
When will you have your own blog? You seem to have more expertise to offer than is seemly for any 15 year old.
Comment by Dadaclu — July 28, 2007 @ 9:56 pm |
I thought everyone knew about La Mona’s blog.
Comment by Psycheout — July 28, 2007 @ 10:24 pm |
“As far as the whole evolution thing is concerned, my opinion on the matter (for what it’s worth) is that God knew that His creatures would effect change upon their environments, and so planned right from the get-go for these creatures to adapt to these changed environments. And yes, I’m certain that there are inconsistencies and holes that can be poked into that theory, but overall, it is one that just feels right to me. (Nobody ever said faith was logical, folks.)”
This is what I mean by evolution and God not being mutually exclusive. Many people have the belief that God created evolution, too. It’s all a part of his ‘divine plan’.
But maybe you never thought about or even considered such a posibility, BJ. So maybe before you label someone “a unthinking fool” (your words there) you should think a bit about what they are saying first. I’m thanking you in advance for the apology. Thanks!
Comment by Brandon Explosion — July 28, 2007 @ 10:48 pm |
Dadaclu, I’m 17.
Lyssie, yea, we named it Cat. But hey, how many people do you know with a cat named Cat? He’s a cool cat. And he does come when I call him when he’s not sleeping, lol.
Psycheout, I have next to no desire to keep up with an entire blog of my own. Many of the things I would speak of are done so with friends from church and school. Posting here is random amusement. Other than this, the Internet is used for school (includes my email/myspace/facebook stuff) basically. Anywho, the thing that is currently up has half of an unfinished entry on how I don’t like No Child Left Behind in its current state, and that’s it.
Comment by La Mona — July 28, 2007 @ 10:55 pm |
This post is truly surreal.
What happened to Sisyphus? Did he get tired of being a petty fool and decide to leave for good?
La Mona, I would love to have a cat named Cat! Also, a pug named Stacey.
Comment by Adam Nelson — July 28, 2007 @ 11:01 pm |
Lol, Stacy? Hmmm, my mom may like that and steal it for the next pug. (She loves the pugs…)
And I’m glad someone likes his name. 🙂
Comment by La Mona — July 28, 2007 @ 11:14 pm |
La Mona, I was kidding. Nobody knows about your blog but you and me. Let’s keep it between the two of us. 😉
Comment by Psycheout — July 29, 2007 @ 12:24 am |
Wow, Psycheout, you’re really trying to pull out all the stops, eh? You’re trying to nail me across multiple blogs, and the cookie monster thing is pretty funny. It’s funny how he tries to be so vicious and insulting, but he just looks retarded. Keep it up!
Comment by Adam Nelson — July 29, 2007 @ 8:22 am |
How DUMB of you to post a blog bashing someone – what a loser you are.
Comment by Stancel Spencer — July 29, 2007 @ 11:20 am |
“What happened to Sisyphus? Did he get tired of being a petty fool and decide to leave for good?”
I left and went to work, and worked non-stop until now. I just got home, and after a nap I go back to work. My family needs the money, and so does my Church. But most importantly, Senator Brownback needs it. To loll about while his campaign is starving would be a sin.
Comment by Sisyphus — July 29, 2007 @ 2:05 pm |
Sam Brownback is more important than your family?
Comment by Brandon Explosion — July 29, 2007 @ 7:44 pm |
“Posting here is random amusement. Other than this, the Internet is used for school (includes my email/myspace/facebook stuff) basically.”
Same here, minus the myspace.
Comment by Brandon Explosion — July 29, 2007 @ 7:45 pm |
Mrs. Gaines-Crockett, I am so sorry to hear that your poor child is a deaf mute! As the grand-mother of a deaf mute child, I know how horribly stressful it can be. I am glad that you can somehow enjoy her disability so much. You should be proud that God chose to bless you with such a ‘special’ child. It takes a special person to bear such burdens, I am sure that when you die, God will make sure you get exactly what you deserve.
Comment by Candide — July 30, 2007 @ 2:03 pm |
The thing is that Adam Nelson is correct on all accounts. He’s one of the few people who post here who has a firm foot in reality. The rest of you are either liars or living in fantasy koolade land or both.
Comment by Spacebrother — October 30, 2007 @ 9:18 am |
“I am indeed a mother, of a beatiful daughter, Rebecca. She is smart, articulate, respectful, and a very devout Christian. I coould not ask for a better child. May the lord bless you with one of your own someday who is half as wonderful as my own. As too I am a pet lover. I have two Standard poodles whom I just adore and three Rotties that I am also very fond of.
In fact, I embrace and cherish all of God’s creatures, though not their sins, which is biblically directed by God, look it up.
I might add that you being a cat person comes as no surprise. People tend to adopt pets that suit their personalities best so a cat seems like the perfect match for you. May you and your four-legged friends live long, healthy lives.”
Comment by Mrs. T.D. Gaines-Crockett — July 28, 2007 @ 12:49 pm
Uh……who cares? WTF does your personal life have to do with the thread topic? The a-holes here threatened to ban me for being off topic and yet here is this thread. Bunch of ultra neo-con koolade hypocrits.
Comment by Spacebrother — October 30, 2007 @ 9:23 am |
The only man accused of Britain’s biggest bank robbery walked free from court yesterday after the collapse of his trial. More..
by xrtst302a
Comment by chakbells — October 11, 2008 @ 4:12 pm |
Ah, so Fagdam Nelson is here?
Nice to meet you. Been a while since we last met, eh, chap?
Comment by rapaxpringer — July 25, 2009 @ 6:27 pm |
lol at ur face
Comment by bob — February 24, 2010 @ 11:00 am |
answer for the message
Comment by natakotik — May 5, 2010 @ 2:07 pm |