Blogs 4 Brownback

May 1, 2008

The D.C. Madam and the Wages of Sin

Filed under: Justice/Law,Sin — Psycheout @ 2:04 pm
Tags: , , , ,

DC MadamSin eventually catches up with sinners, and one way or another those who sin unrepentantly always come to a tragic end. So it was with D.J. Palfrey. She either committed suicide or was herself suicided for what she knew about powerful D.C. Democrats.

Deborah Jeane Palfrey, better known as the “D.C. Madam,” apparently has committed suicide at her mother’s Tarpon Springs home.

Tarpon Springs detectives said a body was found in a small storage shed on the west side of the mobile home. Handwritten notes were found that describe the victim’s intention to take her life, and foul play does not appear to be involved.

Was Billary Clinton on her client list? How about Barry Obambi? We’ll probably never know. The Democrats aren’t good at much, but they expert in murder and debauchery.

What’s interesting about the above excerpt is that it raises more questions than it answers. The Clintons have always been good at making their enemies commit “suicide” (Vince Foster) or die in “accidents” (Ron Brown). In fact, the trail of bodies left behind by the Clintons is rather impressive, if not intimidating. Perhaps the D.C. Madam may be added to that list. But I digress.

Back to the questions raised. “Apparently” committed suicide? “Handwritten notes?” In whose handwriting? What was said in these “handwritten notes?” Body “found” in a shed? Was it locked from the outside? One thing is for sure: it certainly is convenient for a lot of powerful Democrats that the D.C. Madam decided to shuffle off this mortal coil without playing her trump card, her client list. I bet a lot of adulterers and perverts in high places are breathing a collective sigh of relief.

Madam PalfreyFor those not familiar with the significance of the D.C. Madam story, perhaps a little background is in order:

Palfrey was convicted April 15 by a federal jury of running a prostitution service that catered to members of Washington’s political elite….

So naturally a lot of politicians and other powerful people were fearing exposure during the upcoming sentencing.

She was convicted of money laundering, using the mail for illegal purposes and racketeering. Palfrey faced a maximum of 55 years in prison and was free pending her sentencing July 24.

Facing that kind of time at her age, she likely would have struck a deal, including exposing powerful Democrats, in order to save her own skin. Something had to be done. And something apparently was.

Prosecutors had asked the judge to keep Palfrey locked up until her sentencing. But the judge refused, saying she was intelligent and knew she would be punished if she tried to flee the country.

Perhaps the judge was one of her clients or pressured by another to keep her out of jail. Why was this high-profile criminal, already convicted of serious crimes, not at least kept in protective custody? We can only speculate, but something doesn’t smell right.

Brandy BrittonAnd this is not the first “suicide” connected to this scandal.

One of the escort service employees was former University of Maryland, Baltimore County, professor Brandy Britton, who was arrested on prostitution charges in 2006. She committed suicide in January before she was scheduled to go to trial.

If that doesn’t set off alarm bells, here’s how the D.C. Madam herself responded to Brandy’s “suicide.”

Last year, Palfrey said she, too, was humiliated by her prostitution charges, but said: “I guess I’m made of something that Brandy Britton wasn’t made of.”

What, or rather who, made her change her mind? This is very suspicious indeed. Something doesn’t add up here.

What the D.C. Madam knew about the Clintons, Obama and other powerful Democrats will go to the grave with her corpse. It’s very likely that any inconvenient evidence was “cleaned” by a DNC containment squad prior to the dumping of Palfrey into the shed with manufactured suicide notes.

We can only hope that Palfrey hid some of the evidence she died for that will resurface later and expose those her very existence put in danger. Perhaps the story is not at its end.

But one thing is clear from this episode: when one flagrantly sins without repentance the wages are pretty steep. The D.C. Madam certainly found this out firsthand. What really happened, however, we may never really know.

Please contact B4B if you have further information about this case that will expose the truth.

Update: For the idiot complaining about the quoted article being from a blog (maintained by the St. Petersburg Times, a mainstream newspaper), here’s another.  Is the liberal BBC good enough for you?

Ms Palfrey, often referred to as “the DC Madam”, was found hanged in a shed next to her mother’s house in Florida.

Notice the use of the passive voice.  She was “found hanged,” not simply that she hung herself.  Strange.  But yes, the D.C. Madam really is dead.  Do you believe it now?  What’s wrong with you people?

Oh noes, I got that link from another blog, so the story must be false!  /sarc

— Psycheout

April 29, 2008

A Fishy Drug Raid

Filed under: Defending America,Justice/Law,War on Drugs — Psycheout @ 12:55 pm
Tags: ,

Fish TankNaturally the media makes a big story out of this: a drug raid gone wrong.  But they remain silent about the thousands of raids that send drug lords to jail and result in the legal confiscation of property that keep our police forces on the watch for dangerous drugs.

Brooklyn Park police were looking for a meth lab, but they found a fish tank and the chemicals needed to maintain it.

Oops.  But of course clandestine drug labs are usually disguised as something they are not.  A fish tank could be used to hide a drug lab.  Although sometimes, as in this case, a fish tank can turn out to be just that: a fish tank.

Adams, a 54-year-old former nurse who said she suffers from a bad back caused by a patient who attacked her a few years ago, was handcuffed. So was her 49-year-old husband.

“They brought us here and said once we clear that area, you can sit down and you will not speak to each other,” she said.

This is standard operating procedure.  Police must protect themselves from the often violent and unpredictable drug crazed folk they come into contact with on a daily basis.  If Adams had turned out to be a meth (death) cook, nobody would care whether or not she had a bad back.  So why is it relevant?

“Ohmigod,” Adams said as she recalled police breaking down her door and flashing the search warrant. “I just kept saying to them, ‘you’ve got the wrong house.’ ”

“From a cursory view, it doesn’t look like our officers did anything wrong,” said Capt. Greg Roehl.

Sometimes people, including our heroic police, make mistakes.  In this case, no harm done.  The Adams’ should feel honored to have been able to cooperate with those who protect and serve.  As should we all if such a rare event were to happen to us.

Roehl said the drug task force was acting on a tip from a subcontractor for CenterPoint Energy, who had been in the home Friday to install a hot water heater.

“He got hit with a chemical smell that he said made him light headed, feel kind of nauseous,” Roehl said.

That’s exactly what one would expect when encountering a drug lab.  This subcontractor did the right thing and should serve as an example to us all.

“Everything this person told us turned out to be true, with the exception of what the purpose of the lab was,” Roehl said.

CenterPoint energy maintains the home was “unsafe” and it would have “irresponsible” for the subcontractor not to report it.

Absolutely.  Sadly the Adams don’t see it that way and are looking for a lawyer to help them cash in.  Whose side are these people on?  The police or the drug thugs?

“I could say that about my neighbor – I smelled something when I went in their house,” she said. “Does that make it right for them to go in there and break the door down and cuff you? I think not!”

Excuse me, ma’am, but you’ve got that completely backwards.  How are we going to win the war on drugs with such a defeatist attitude?  If we’re going to win, we have to stick together.  An alert nose could bring us that much closer to victory and send another criminal to jail.  Isn’t that worth it?  An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.

If a strange smell is coming from your neighbor’s house, don’t hesitate.  That could cost lives.  Call the police and turn them in.  If the authorities find nothing, no harm done.  But if they do and it results in another pothead or meth cook being sent to prison and their property confiscated, you just might earn a financial reward.

Even if you aren’t materially rewarded you will have the good feeling of doing the right thing to help win the war on dangerous drugs and will serve as a shining example to those in your neighborhood.  One should always keep an eye out for one’s neighbors, to help protect their property from outsiders or to turn them in if they are breaking the law.  We are all on one side or the other of that thin blue line.  Which side are you on?

— Psycheout

April 28, 2008

Supreme Court Smacks Down Voter Fraud

Filed under: Defending America,Justice/Law,Supreme Court — Psycheout @ 4:27 pm
Tags: , ,

Real IDWell, America wins again, thanks to an increasingly conservative Supreme Court populated by right thinking Republican Presidents.

States can require voters to produce photo identification, the Supreme Court ruled Monday, upholding a Republican-inspired law that Democrats say will keep some poor, older and minority voters from casting ballots.

This is wise, as poor people are generally less informed than wealthy people who actually follow politics and tend to vote Republican.  At first, only property owning males were allowed to vote.  Sometimes the old ways are the right ways.  This is one of them.

The ruling means the ID requirement will be in effect for next week’s presidential primary in Indiana, where a significant number of new voters are expected to turn out for the Democratic contest between Sens. Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama.

Ha ha moonbats!  Wouldn’t it be funny if no Democrats were eligible to vote?  You bet it would!

Now liberals can’t just round up a bunch of so-called “new voters” with free crack, malt liquor and taco supremes.  These “new voters” must actually be eligible to vote.  That is, they must actually have valid id.  Illegals, criminals and other traditional Democrat party voters need not apply.

Liberal holdouts Breyer, Souter and Ginsberg dissented, presenting this ridiculous sob story:

Indiana’s voter ID law “threatens to impose nontrivial burdens on the voting rights of tens of thousands of the state’s citizens,” Souter said.

The targets of the law, he said, are “voters who are poor and old.”

Oh boo hoo.  Cry me a river.  Get an ID or get out.  And don’t bother voting if you refuse to present your national ID card.  Slackers.

— Psycheout

April 16, 2008

Supreme Court: Hang ’em High

Filed under: Justice/Law,Supreme Court — Tyler Dresden @ 7:02 pm
Tags:

Hang 'em HighThe Supreme Court today smacked down the ridiculous arguments by tree huggers and criminal lovers about the death penalty being too mean to murderers and society’s trash.  States reacted swiftly to the news by greenlighting executions put on hold pending the high court’s decision.  Good!

U.S. executions are all but sure to resume soon after a nationwide halt, cleared Wednesday by a splintered Supreme Court that approved the most widely used method of lethal injection.

Virginia immediately lifted its moratorium; Oklahoma and Mississippi said they would seek execution dates for convicted murderers, and other states were ready to follow after nearly seven months without an execution in the United States.

America has some catching up to do: seven months worth of injustice needs to be reversed.

This is a time to celebrate.  God’s law has been upheld.  I say fry ’em or hang ’em, but if all we got is the needle now, stick it to ’em.  An eye for an eye, not a smack on the wrist.  Liberals want to coddle criminals, while conservatives just kill them.

Who would you rather have in charge?

td

The Sharpie: A Dangerous Gateway Drug

Filed under: Drugs,Justice/Law,Weirdos and Hippies — Psycheout @ 6:24 pm
Tags: , ,

SharpieIt’s rare that I find good cause to praise anything that secular humanist public schools do, but in this case a school might just have saved lives.  So a round of applause is certainly in order.

Adams School District 50 is defending its decision to punish a third grader for sniffing a Sharpie marker.

In druggie circles, the practice is called “huffing.”  It’s where common household chemicals and even marking pen fumes are concentrated and inhaled.  It can lead to intoxication, nausea, euphoria, vomiting and even masturbation or death.

Harris used a black Sharpie marker to color a small area on the sleeve of his sweatshirt. A teacher sent him to the principal when she noticed him smelling the marker and his clothing.

“It smelled good,” Harris said. “They told me that’s wrong.”

Well no kidding, you stupid kid!  It can destroy your life if not your brain.  Idiot!

Huffers start getting their kicks from marking pens, but soon move on to pouring chemicals such as paint or insecticide or even gasoline into paper bags and inhaling the fumes.  If your kid comes out of the garage looking guilty or confused with paint all around his mouth, you probably have a huffer on your hands.  Get him to treatment immediately, otherwise he’ll likely move on to more dangerous drugs like crack, heroin or even marijuana, the devil’s drug of choice.

“This is really, really, seriously dangerous,” Benisch said.

In his letter suspending the child, Benisch wrote that smelling the marker fumes could cause the boy to “become intoxicated.”

School is no place to be intoxicated or to huff dangerous mind-altering chemicals.  That goes for students as well as teachers.

The principal did the right thing here by throwing the book at this little criminal.  And the quick and forceful action by the school may well deter other potential druggies from going down the same road.  Only losers use drugs.  Winners turn them in.

If your parents, siblings, friends or neighbors are suspected by you of using drugs, you should turn them into the local police and get a reward.  It’s the right thing to do and can be profitable.  And you just might save some lives through your vigilance.

Be a winner and turn criminals into the authorities.

Addendum: Note that in the “Sharpie” ad shown above that the manufacturers know what their product is really used for.  The ad copy encourages users to “Go MENTAL,” a not so subtle reference to huffing the fumes to get high.  Shameless, aren’t they?

— Psycheout

April 3, 2008

Atheist Anti-Christian Teacher May Be History

Filed under: Education,Faith,Family Values,Justice/Law,Satanism,War on Christianity — Psycheout @ 7:15 pm
Tags:

AtheistsA public school teacher who instructed his impressionable classroom of children that “Christians are more likely than other people to commit rape and murder” is being sued for his anti-Christian remarks which have left a young student emotionally traumatized and literally scarred for life.  This is the price of allowing atheism to infest and infect our schools, a gradual process which has been causing widespread social decay ever since an activist Supreme Court kicked G-d out of the classroom against His wishes.

“It was very hard for me because it’s like basically telling me all this stuff that I’ve believed my whole entire life — it’s just basically trying to throw it out the window,” Farnan told FOX News.

But this revisionist history teacher may find himself thrown out the window, on the outside looking in, if Justice prevails.

Farnan’s family has filed a federal lawsuit against the Capistrano Unified School District, claiming Corbett’s remarks violated the First Amendment, which prohibits laws “respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.” They are demanding that Corbett be fired.

The “defense” is rather weak, although just the kind of nonsense that secular progressive groups like the ACLU are likely to back.

“The purpose is not to indoctrinate, but simply to provide a basic starting point to provoke discussion,” Spradlin said.

Encouraging a rousing discussion about the Glory of G-d and His rightful place at the head of our society does not require the belittlement and persecution of Christians everywhere.  And it is neither a school’s nor a teacher’s place to confuse and warp young minds by attacking their personal faith and relationship with Jesus Christ.

This teacher should clearly be history.  Maybe living in a cardboard box and panhandling for a living will teach him some religious tolerance and respect for people of faith.

— Psycheout

March 8, 2008

Bush Refuses to Ban Waterboarding

Kudos to President Bush for not backing down on the issue of permitting terrorists to enjoy watersports:

President Bush said Saturday he vetoed legislation that would ban the CIA from using harsh interrogation methods such as waterboarding to break suspected terrorists because it would end practices that have prevented attacks.

“The bill Congress sent me would take away one of the most valuable tools in the war on terror,” Bush said in his weekly radio address taped for broadcast Saturday. “So today I vetoed it,” Bush said. The bill provides guidelines for intelligence activities for the year and includes the interrogation requirement. It passed the House in December and the Senate last month.

“This is no time for Congress to abandon practices that have a proven track record of keeping America safe,” the president said.

Look, no one here enjoys waterboarding. It’s an immoral, sinful pastime. But the terrorists enjoy the practice, and President Bush is making a perfectly valid point: in a nation where the deviant activity known as “snowboarding” is 100% legal, how can he be expected to ban its cousin? Why should worthless snow-Hippies get to damn themselves to Hell, but the CIA not be permitted to use similar sporting pleasures as leverage to extract information from terrorists?

You can’t have it both ways, America. Either you can ban all sinful demon-loving sports, or keep your awful mountain hobby and let the CIA keep their interrogation “carrot.”

February 26, 2008

Profiles in Courage: Clarence Thomas

While some prominent black people prefer to engage in criminal behavior like crack cocaine-smoking sodomy, others show themselves to be true American patriots. A prime example of this is Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas. Ever since his contentious 1991 confirmation hearing, he’s had to endure the slings and arrows of outraged racist moonbat media people. Case in point:

Two years and 144 cases have passed since Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas last spoke up at oral arguments. It is a period of unbroken silence that contrasts with the rest of the court’s unceasing inquiries.

Hardly a case goes by, including two appeals that were argued Monday, without eight justices peppering lawyers with questions. Oral arguments offer justices the chance to resolve nagging doubts about a case, probe its weaknesses or make a point to their colleagues.

Left, right and center, the justices ask and they ask and they ask. Sometimes they debate each other, leaving the lawyer at the podium helpless to jump in. “I think you’re handling these questions very well,” Chief Justice John Roberts quipped to a lawyer recently in the midst of one such exchange.

Leaning back in his leather chair, often looking up at the ceiling, Thomas takes it all in, but he never joins in.

Monday was no different. Thomas said nothing.

He occasionally leans to his right to share a comment or a laugh with Justice Stephen Breyer. Less often, he talks to Justice Anthony Kennedy, to his immediate left.

Thomas, characteristically, declined to comment for this article. But in the course of his publicity tour for his autobiography, “My Grandfather’s Son,” the 59-year-old justice discussed his reticence on the bench on several occasions.

The questions may be helpful to the others, Thomas said, but not to him.

“One thing I’ve demonstrated often in 16 years is you can do this job without asking a single question,” he told an adoring crowd at the Federalist Society, a conservative legal group.

The book tour showed that the topic comes up even among friendly audiences.

Indeed, Thomas’ comment was provoked by this question: Why do your colleagues ask so many questions?

His response: “I did not plant that question. That’s a fine question. When you figure out the answer, you let me know,” he said.

Thomas understands the nature of his work. He knows full well that the Supreme Court overreached its Constitutional authority back when it was run by Communists like Earl Warren and Thurgood Marshall, its overreach gaining unprecedented levels of anti-American totalitarianism at the ideological behest of worthless Trotskyite Micks like Brennan. Thomas, and Chief Justice Roberts, are doing their part to limit the Court’s role to its historic function: settling Constitutional disputes between the Legislature and the Executive, and correcting the overreach of lower Court that overlook the original intent of the Framers of the Constitution.

You know what makes anti-Thomas smear jobs like this one evern more ridiculous? Thomas has friends on the Left side of the Court who agree with him.

The typical hourlong argument session can sometimes be difficult, even for a practiced questioner.

“I really would like to hear what those reasons are without interruption from all of my colleagues,” Justice John Paul Stevens said at an argument in the fall.

Even a treefrog like Stevens wishes the Court would shut up and get to work. Why doesn’t he get a nasty article about him? Because the media agrees with his politics, that’s why.

In the past, the Georgia-born Thomas has chalked up his silence to his struggle as a teenager to master standard English after having grown up speaking Geechee, a kind of dialect that thrived among former slaves on the islands off the South Carolina, Georgia and Florida coasts.

He also has said he will ask a pertinent question if his colleagues don’t but sees no need to engage in the back-and-forth just to hear his own voice.

Lately, he has focused on the latter reason.

“If I think a question will help me decide a case, then I’ll ask that question,” he told C-SPAN’s Brian Lamb in October. “Otherwise, it’s not worth asking because it detracts from my job.”

He talked in that same interview about descriptions of him as the silent justice.

The racists are giving Thomas trouble because, despite the fact that he didn’t grow up in an English-speaking household, he’s trying to master English as a second language. I’ll take that over your English-refusing illegal alien any day; but to some in this country, foreigners who refuse to speak any language but the hodge-podge gobbledygook Satan taught their ancestors should receive more rights in this country than a hero like Thomas. Liberals are kooks; what do you expect?

Suppose surgeons started discussing the merits of removing a gallbladder while in the operating room, Thomas said, as quoted by U.S. News & World Report. “You really didn’t go in there to have a debate about gallbladder surgery,” he said. Similarly, “we are there to decide cases, not to engage in seminar discussions.”

Exactly. Shut up and do your job, Court. Nobody’s paying you to gesture emptily and hear yourselves think. We want speedy opinions pulling the law back in line with the Original intent, not a bunch of talky-talky Communists spewing Marxist vomit all over our hallowed documents and traditions. Thomas, like Scalia, Alito, and Roberts, is a true American hero for understanding all this. The media can crucify him for it, but he’ll continue to endure for many a year yet.

Please keep our America-loving Justices hale and healthy, Lord, and smite our infanticide-loving enemies with plagues during Republican Administrations.

February 4, 2008

B4B Ahead of the Curve Again: The FBI Agrees with Us

Filed under: Defending America,Justice/Law — Psycheout @ 10:03 pm
Tags: , , ,

Biometrics for FreedomMany months ago I wrote about the brave new world offered to us freedom loving Americans that RFID promised. The FBI has gone beyond that and will take us forward into a braver new 21st Century. The rule of law and law enforcement has never had such a bright future. America should be proud, enthusiastic and more than ready to move into the new century, safe and free. Remember 9/11?

The FBI is gearing up to create a massive computer database of people’s physical characteristics, all part of an effort the bureau says to better identify criminals and terrorists.

Awesome. Let’s bring the libtards along, kicking and screaming, into a new improved beacon of freedom and security.

But it’s an issue that raises major privacy concerns — what one civil liberties expert says should concern all Americans.

Stop the ACLUBoo hoo hoo. If you’ve got something to hide. Like criminal activity. Why do so called “civil liberties” activists like the anti-American ACLU always seek to protect terrorists, drug dealers and other lawbreakers?

The bureau is expected to announce in coming days the awarding of a $1 billion, 10-year contract to help create the database that will compile an array of biometric information — from palm prints to eye scans.

Kimberly Del Greco, the FBI’s Biometric Services section chief, said adding to the database is “important to protect the borders to keep the terrorists out, protect our citizens, our neighbors, our children so they can have good jobs, and have a safe country to live in.”

ParanoiaWho could disagree with that? Bring on the libtards:

But it’s unnerving to privacy experts.

Yeah, protecting the borders, keeping the terrorists out, protecting our citizens and neighbors and children and having good jobs in a safe country is “unnerving.” What a bunch of bedwetters.

“It’s the beginning of the surveillance society where you can be tracked anywhere, any time and all your movements, and eventually all your activities will be tracked and noted and correlated,” said Barry Steinhardt, director of the American Civil Liberties Union’s Technology and Liberty Project.

Law EnforcementThis same old garbage is trotted out whenever law enforcement attempts to get the upper hand on criminals and terrorists. It’s the same old song and dance. Hey ACLU, if you’ve got nothing to hide, you’ve got nothing to fear. The fact that the ACLU was founded by anarchists and communists determined to tear America into shreds and make it a Marxist utopia isn’t so bad, is it? Why hide that irrefutable fact? Stand up for your beliefs, proudly!

The FBI has also started collecting mug shots and pictures of scars and tattoos. These images are being stored for now as the technology is fine-tuned. All of the FBI’s biometric data is stored on computers 30-feet underground in the Clarksburg facility.

Tattoo and PiercingFirst of all, anyone who has a tattoo is obviously guilty of something. So I think it is blatantly obvious that these folks need trackable ankle bracelets and RFID implants. Perhaps it should be a law that you get an RFID implant or have it verified that you have one to get a tattoo or a facial piercing. But I’m just brainstorming here.

In addition, the FBI could soon start comparing people’s eyes — specifically the iris, or the colored part of an eye — as part of its new biometrics program called Next Generation Identification.

DataEveryone liked Star Trek: The Next Generation, right? So why not Next Generation Identification? It sounds so futuristic and cool. Sign all our libtard commenters up! I bet most of them are trekkies and criminals anyway!

The FBI plans a so-called “rap-back” service in which an employer could ask the FBI to keep the prints for an employee on file and let the employer know if the person ever has a brush with the law. The FBI says it will first have to clear hurdles with state privacy laws, and people would have to sign waivers allowing their information to be kept.

MC HammerYou leftists love rap (or hop hop) too, right? So prepare for the “rap-back.” It’s in America’s best interests. And if we can protect you from yourselves, it’s a win-win situation. G-d bless useful technology. G-d made us all unique, so he would smile on this new technology that celebrates it. So should us all.

— Psycheout

January 1, 2008

Crime and Punishment

Crime and PunishmentA reader sent me this article, and it makes me see red:

As Sarah Kreager, 26, tried to sit down on a Baltimore City bus Tuesday, police say, a middle-schooler told her she couldn’t. When she attempted to take another seat, a middle-schooler wouldn’t let her. Finally, according to police, Kreager just sat down.

She was “immediately attacked” by nine students — three females and six males — from Robert Poole Middle School. They punched and kicked her at 2:59 p.m. at the intersection of 33rd Street and Chestnut Avenue, according to Maryland Transit Administration police.

Kreager was dragged off the bus and her boyfriend, Troy Ennis, attempted to get her back on, police said.

She sustained “serious injuries” and had to be transported to the University of Maryland Shock Trauma Center, according to a police report.

Kreager suffered two broken bones in her left eye socket, police said.

“She had eye muscles that were damaged,” a police report states. “She had deep lacerations on the top of her head and another above her neck.”

Two seats and the bus’ rear glass were destroyed during the attack, police said.

The bus driver on the No. 27 line quickly called police, who responded and arrested the nine juveniles, said Jawauna Greene, an MTA police spokeswoman.

All nine suspects, ages 14 and 15, were arrested and charged with aggravated assault.

Their bus tickets — provided by the school — have been revoked, Greene said.

“Riding the bus is a privilege,” she said. “Public safety is our primary concern.”

I don’t live in, or near Baltimore, and I wouldn’t want to. But this is a national problem. All of our major cities, and many of our minor cities, are turning out like this. Crime and the young age of the new criminals are issues of primary national concern. As the policewoman noted, “Public safety is our primary concern.”

The reader who sent me the link also included these comments of his own on solutions to the problem:

Soldiers on the streets are what quell riots, not what start them. Weakness starts them. Lilly-livered, p***ified urban strategies that rely solely on miracles for solving real practical problems. Strategies like…um…hoping gentrification will put a new coat of whitewash on the ghetto. Hint: gentrification doesn’t solve poverty. The poor and f***ed are still poor and f***ed no matter how many shell games you use to move the ghetto around.

Call it what it is: The cities are warzones. Cops are just soldiers, and they’re badly trained and underequiped soldiers at that. Put real soldiers on the streets and stop the drug trade and predatory violence dead solid cold. You slang a rock or try to jack somebody, you die. They shoot one of the soldiers, raze the block he was standing on. Dumbs**t bangers only get one thing, strength. And we just retreat because race is involved, and when it comes to race, it’s all about bulls**t.

By every available piece of data, a soldier in Baghdad is safer than the mean citizen of most major American cities. An Iraqi policeman (aka big f***ing target) is safer there than in NO, Detroit, DC, Baltimore, NY, and Philly. Last I heard, there was a war/civil war/insurrection going on over there. But here? Nothing to see here, move along, pay no attention to the blood on the street or the hate filled black man waving a gun. Nope, no insurrection here.

I couldn’t agree more, personally. I couldn’t have said it better myself. These jackals only understand force, so force is what we need to give them. We need to hire some contractors to patrol the streets of our cities, and they need kill on sight orders for anyone committing a crime or out after curfew. It’s the only way to keep this country safe. And keeping America safe is the only way to keep it free.

November 7, 2007

Sensible Laws for a Better Society

Filed under: Christmas,Family Values,Justice/Law — Psycheout @ 6:11 pm
Tags: ,

Pajamas, a path to pietyA friend of mine recently had reason to visit Minnesota and pointed out one of their state laws which deserves highlighting. In fact, it seems The North Star State may be ahead of the curve on this one. I put it to you that the law in question should be made into a federal law. Specifically, in Minnesota, it is illegal to sleep in the buff. Pajamas, as everybody knows, are worn by the most productive in our nation. Going to bed sans pajamas leads to unhealthy practices. That goes without saying.  Yet I went and said it.

If nothing else, a nationwide law should require all of those under 18 to wear clothing at all times. Think about it. That alone would reduce, if not eliminate, extra-marital teen pregnancies, a nationwide scourge. Teenage nudity leads to temptation. Temptation leads to masturbation and fornication. Fornication outside of wedlock leads to abortion and/or illegitimate children.

Allowing your child to sleep in the nude is to encourage a lifetime of depravity. So it seems that any Christmas or birthday celebration that does not include good sensible flannel pajamas is a missed opportunity to pass along good wholesome family values. Show that you care. Be sure to include pajamas on that gift list.

Minnesota also prohibits oral sex. That is a logical prohibition which should also go nationwide.  The reasons are plenty and obvious.

Some other Minnesota laws include such oddities as prohibiting the crossing of state lines with a duck upon one’s head and the entrance into Wisconsin with a chicken on one’s head. Strange to be sure. I’m not sure what the history is behind those laws. It is also prohibited to loiter around a building without a good reason for being there. That makes a lot of sense. Motorcycle riders must wear a shirt at all times, also sensible.

But the pajamas requirement is what piqued my interest, as I am sure it did yours. Sensible laws for a better society. Do your part and keep America the greatest nation on G-d’s creation. Thank you.

— Psycheout

November 3, 2007

Parking Tickets Must Be Abolished!

Parking TicketI got a ticket yesterday for something so stupid I hesitate to even share it with you. The degenerate liberal scumbags who constitute the Town Elders of this wretched New England village are undoubtedly pleased that my hard-earned cash is going into the coffers to finance their next orgy, but I can assure you that I am not amused. Neither is God, who will smite these wrongdoers in His righteous fury when the time is at hand.

I can understand ticketing cars for carrying socially irresponsible messages, such as drug slogans or Bernie Sanders stickers or those idiotic “W” crossed out things, but what I did shouldn’t even be a crime. I was parked in front of a fire hydrant. That’s it. Apparently, you’re not supposed to do that in this idiotic town. The rationale is that fire trucks need to get at the hydrants in the event of a fire, so that they can spray down the buildings and save the person’s home.

I can understand that system completely. What I don’t understand is allowing the city to siphon money out of the wallets of those who violate these silly edicts. This is a free country, with a free, capitalist economy. The way it should work is that residents of the area should check my license plate, call a private information-gathering service to acquire my name and telephone number (for some purely nominal fee), then call me up and ask me to move my car. If the offered price merits a move, I will cheerfully move my car immediately after receipt of payment. Then, should a fire occur, the privately-owned fire department will arrive and hose down any residences in the neighborhood carrying a sticker indicating they have paid the necessary fire prevention fees. If the fire comes, and my car is still parked there, the firefighters should steal it and move it. They should then pay me for the damage to my vehicle, reimbursing themselves out of the pocket of the person whose home they’ve just saved.

Fire HydrantThis system is substantially better than one involving government. The investment opportunities it presents are nearly unlimited. Moreover, it will stimulate the economy by requiring greater capital expenditures on the part of all parties. Any inequities in the system will quickly be corrected by the invisible hand of the market, which is wont to speedily amend all economic wrongs. Best of all, no more parking tickets. No more parking meters, except those controlled by private investors. No more tows for parking in front of privately-owned fire hydrants.

Obviously, my system may have a kink or two, but on the whole I think it would work just fine. I think I’m going to send it in to this city along with the ticket money they’ve extorted from me. I don’t expect the degenerate moonbats to act on it, but they can’t say they haven’t been presented with the ideas. What do you think?

October 26, 2007

Et Tu, Georgia?

GavelGeorgia has gone RINO on us, allowing deviants and perverts to roam its streets at will:

Georgia’s Supreme Court on Friday ordered the release of a young man who has been imprisoned for more than two years for having consensual oral sex with another teenager.

The court ruled 4-3 that Genarlow Wilson’s 10-year sentence was cruel and unusual punishment.

Wilson, 21, was convicted of aggravated child molestation following a 2003 New Year’s Eve party at a Douglas County hotel room where he was videotaped having oral sex with a 15-year-old girl. He was 17 at the time.

Georgia has gone the way of California, New York, New Jersey, Vermont, and every other state that wants to let sexual perverts and predators molest children at will. The shameless decision of the Georgia Supreme Court will haunt each and every one of its members until the day they die and face judgment for their actions.

When we said that legitimizing homosexuality would lead to legitimizing NAMBLA, the moonbats scoffed. Now we see that America is one day closer to the fulfillment of that dour prophecy. I hope you’re happy that your children can now be savagely sodomized by vicious predators, leftists. You have sown the wind by letting homosexuals off the hook; now you reap the whirlwind in the form of legalized pederasty.

God please forgive America her sins, and lead her back into Thy Light.

August 28, 2007

Death Penalty Opponents Must Be Stopped!

Death penalty extremists are up in arms as usual, this time over Texas’ righteous punishment of one of their pet murderers.

Texas has told the European Union to mind its own business after the bloc called on the state’s governor to get rid of the death penalty.
The EU expressed “great regret” at Texas’ preparations to carry out its 400th death penalty and renewed its call to the US to halt executions.

Good for Texas. They did the right thing by executing this murderer. Anything that aggravates the Secularist Islamist States of Olde Europe is likely to be a pretty good idea, but most especially the matter of justifiably punishing sins against God, like murder.

Execution is the most important function of the State. God has ordained that These United States shall rule the world, justly and with Christianity. But how is the US supposed to do that if it can’t maintain order against those in rebellion against it? Murder is the ultimate act of criminal sedition, as the citizenry are the basis of the body politic. The reason we form a more perfect Union is to save ourselves from bandits and brigands; the state performs its most essential function, security, by extirpating these vermin. Some crimes may be punishable by lesser measures, such as branding or imprisonment. For example the hand that raises its middle finger should be the hand that loses its middle finger, if we are to deter and punish acts of obscenity and indecency.

If lesser crimes are to be punished in such a fashion (and not, themselves, with death, as Marcia P. would undoubtedly assert), then surely the crime of murder must be punished in the harshest possible fashion. An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth, and a life for a life. Deterrance and punishment must swiftly and justly follow each crime. Such is the Law of God, such is the Law of Man, such is the basis for the very existence of our society.

Those who oppose the death penalty oppose civilization, America, and Christianity. If the death penalty was good enough for Our Lord, Jesus Christ, it’s good enough for any of us. Put that in your marijuana cigarette and smoke it, Amnesty International! God endured the death penalty Hmself; who are we to spare murderers the same punishment? A life sentence is far less likely to inspire true repentance than an imminent death is. By incarcerating rather than killing, we send more souls to Satan. I have little doubt that such is part of the agenda of the atheist, Marxist Amnesty International and its treefrog Helioleftist American moonbat supporters.

We must remember that we are America- these other people are not. Ours is the greatest and most just society in human history. So long as we execute murderers and other traitors, we shall keep it that way.

God bless America.

UPDATE: President-Elect-to-be Sam Brownback agrees with me. Murder the murderers, but not the non-murderers. Those people should be maimed, depending on their sins. Incarceration for the lesser seditionists. Such is law. Such is justice. Such is America as our Christian Founders intended it to be.

August 10, 2007

HELLO!!!

DrunkHELLO BROWNABCKRES!!! I AM JA K FREMONT I HATE HOMOS AND COMMIES AND MOONBAYTS!! I LIKE TO DRINK!!!

VOTE BROWNASCK!!! VOTE BROWNAKC!!! VOTE BROWNABCK!!!!

Next Page »

Blog at WordPress.com.