Blogs 4 Brownback

April 17, 2008

Cao’s Having a Party and You’re All Invited

Filed under: Talk Radio — Psycheout @ 12:47 am
Tags:

CaoProbably the most exciting radio talk show host this side of Rush Limbaugh and Taylor Marsh is Cao (pronounced “Key,” not “Cow,” you liberal trolls).

She does a daily weekly radio show that kicks lieberal backside and takes names. And she’s having a trackback party with some of the greatest names in blogging.

So if you’ve got the time to prevent the homo agenda and democrat defeatism and liberal liberalism, give her a listen. You’ll be glad you did. And she looks almost exactly like Linda Hamilton. She’s the gal who terminated the Terminator. She’ll do the same to the libs. “You’re terminated, lover.”

— Psycheout

57 Comments »

  1. That IS Linda Hamilton. The images, anyways. The author herself is not.

    Interestingly, she doesn’t believe in genocide. Also, she’s not barefoot, pregnant, or in the kitchen.

    Comment by Dio Brando — April 17, 2008 @ 2:41 am | Reply

  2. Thanks for the props, but I don’t have a daily talkshow – my show is usually on Sundays from 3-4 CST at Blog talk radio, here.

    Comment by Cao — April 17, 2008 @ 4:34 am | Reply

  3. I heard a rumour that Robert patrick (of Terminator 2 fame)put in a guest appearance at an Alabama KKK meeting last week. He gave a stirring speach to the assembled bottom-feeders on the wonders of abortion then produced a bag of vaginas from his pocket and offered then round.

    Comment by Pervy Gnome — April 17, 2008 @ 7:06 am | Reply

  4. I heard a rumour that Robert patrick (of Terminator 2 fame)put in a guest appearance at an Alabama KKK meeting last week. He gave a stirring speach to the assembled bottom-feeders on the wonders of abortion then produced a bag of vaginas from his pocket and offered them round.

    Comment by Pervy Gnome — April 17, 2008 @ 7:07 am | Reply

  5. 1/10

    you’re losing your grip, psyfag.

    Comment by eBaums Fag — April 17, 2008 @ 6:18 pm | Reply

  6. Okay, b4b. Let’s be honest for a second.

    First of all, let me clarify what you aren’t. You are not a far-right republican. You are not a christian or any religious preference for that matter. You are not in any way endorsing anyone in the republican party who’s name isn’t Ron Paul. And you certainly aren’t fooling anyone with your blatantly obvious satire.

    What you are is a troll, plain and simple. You are a /b/tard who got b& for posting CP, and thought it would be funny to make a “Christian Republican” blog in order to fool any and all who come to this site. You are trolling for people to believe you and everything you say just so that you can laugh at them IRL.

    Unfortunately, no one really cares about your blog. You sock-puppet a majority of the people that actually comment on your blog. You probably don’t even have that many pageviews because you aren’t attacking anyone as you were in the past. And any pageviews that you have now are most likely slumping because of your lack of the ability to troll people thoroughly.

    And no matter what you say, you know it’s true. And if I’m wrong, prove it. Prove me wrong you failure of a troll.

    [Admin: Sadly you’re a sock puppet as well. And a dismal failure of one too. We should probably stop writing you because your material frankly bites. By the way, submitting this same paranoid rant to a dozen threads, like you did, is spamming, a bannable offense. Knock it off, retard.]

    Comment by Anonymous — April 17, 2008 @ 8:28 pm | Reply

  7. Hi Everyone! I’m off to the country house in my Hummer! My lovely wife and I have invited some close friends to enjoy the weekend with us at the lake house. I think we will have George groom the horses in case we want to take a ride.

    I have to tell you that I just re-covered the upholstry in my Hummer with real snow-leopard skins! I had a chance to acquire them from a friend who had come back from Afghanistan. (what? no he was not in the miltary, he was a consultant for an NGO)

    They are really cool! Well, I have to run! I want to pick up some new leather straps and harnesses . . . at the riding store…for the horses…

    Have a great weekend!

    Comment by Marty McPain — April 18, 2008 @ 1:21 pm | Reply

  8. You have a great weekend as well, Marty. Everyone should take time out to spend time in their vacation home. It’s a great way to relax and reconnect with the Lord.

    Don’t be a stranger, my friend.

    Comment by Psycheout — April 18, 2008 @ 1:31 pm | Reply

  9. I want to pick up some new leather straps and harnesses . . . at the riding store…for the horses…

    Your sexual innuendo has been noted, you anti-christian pervert.

    Comment by Dio Brando — April 18, 2008 @ 2:03 pm | Reply

  10. Sheesh, even Marty’s stuff is getting worse. I dare say I do not believe that to be the same Marty as usually posts, as it just does not have the same ring to it. It just isn’t right.

    Comment by Armand Jean du Plessis de Richelieu — April 18, 2008 @ 2:19 pm | Reply

  11. Yeah, he didn’t mention brutally raping his daughter.

    Comment by Dio Brando — April 18, 2008 @ 2:46 pm | Reply

  12. Sadly you’re a sock puppet as well.

    you’re a sock puppet as well.

    a sock puppet as well.

    sock puppet as well.

    puppet as well.

    as well.

    You just made a statement that no one will forget. When someone says, “You’re a sock puppet as well”, you announce that you share that title with the other person. Thus proving that you are a sock puppet and making the gaps in your “logic” wider than a whores vagina. You’ve just proven me correct in stating that you are a sock puppet. And since you’ve made this mistake, there’s no doubt that you won’t hint that you are, indeed, a troll. But at this point, nobody will deny this.

    Comment by Anonymous — April 18, 2008 @ 4:04 pm | Reply

  13. Yeah, he didn’t mention brutally raping his daughter. Comment by Dio Brando — April 18, 2008 @ 2:46 pm

    You are a disgusting stupid hell-bound fornicator.

    Stop telling lies about me.

    Comment by Marty McPain — April 18, 2008 @ 9:23 pm | Reply

  14. Considering you’ve broken every deadly sin, you have no credibility.

    Comment by Dio Brando — April 18, 2008 @ 10:30 pm | Reply

  15. “Stop telling lies about me.”
    Christian Chandler said the same thing, you know.

    Comment by Elephant Bones — April 18, 2008 @ 10:39 pm | Reply

  16. “Considering you’ve broken every deadly sin, you have no credibility.”

    you, sir, are a cad and a scoundrel! I don’t care what you believe…because I know that you are going to hell and when I am in heaven I will not be troubled by your ilk…but I will sit at the foot of the Father and laugh as your cries of pain float up from hell as the demons rape your nethers.

    ha ha ha

    and, fyi, I am saved so I can no longer sin…

    Comment by Marty McPain — April 19, 2008 @ 5:00 pm | Reply

  17. you, sir, are a cad and a scoundrel!

    No, but I might be the legendary soldier, Big Boss.

    and, fyi, I am saved so I can no longer sin…

    Show me where in the bible God forgives Original Sin, and the part where any sins are automatically nulled, even when done on a constant basis.

    Comment by Dio Brando — April 19, 2008 @ 8:44 pm | Reply

  18. “By the which will we are sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ ONCE FOR ALL. . . For by one offering he hath PERFECTED FOR EVER them that are sanctified.” Hebrews 10:10,14

    forever…

    Me = forever saved

    Dio = forever a piece of crap destined for hell

    Comment by Marty McPain — April 19, 2008 @ 10:07 pm | Reply

  19. I too, could chop up the Bible and make it sound like I sit at the right hand of God. You must be some kind of egotistical moron, since Hebrews 10:10 and beyond talk about Christ, not “McPain”.

    Here’s some enlightenment:

    10:10 In this verse Hebrews goes beyond a strict commentary on Psalm 40 to sum up his whole position. This verse is also the first place in the book that the full name “Jesus Christ” appears. This use of the full name, the shift from third person to first person plural, and the final occurrence of “once for all” (efapax) contribute to the climactic feel of the verse.

    The phrase “by this will” (en w qelhmati) leaves open the question of whose will it is, and just how does that will affect the sacrifice itself? While many modern translations replace the relative pronoun with “God,” correctly connecting it to the content of the psalm, it may also denote Christ’s will. The question is, Was the offering made by God or by Jesus? The answer is both.

    The question is still left, What effect on the sacrifice does the will of God and the willful offering of the body of Jesus Christ have? Some older commentators have pointed to the “will” as the definitive aspect of Jesus’ actions, putting it over the sacrificial aspect. (Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1913), 369, 371. Modern commentators, on the other hand, see that the actual bodily sacrifice of Christ is important to Hebrews. However, given the primacy of the sacrificial quality of the offering, does the willingness of it, and the conformity to God’s will in it, make the sacrifice interior and therefore heavenly and spiritual? This seems to lean in the wrong direction. Lane gets it right when he says,

    The term ‘body’ shows that the contrast the writer wishes to establish is not between the sacrifice of animals and the sacrifice of obedience, but between the ineffective sacrifice of animals and the personal offering of Christ’s own body as the one complete and effective sacrifice.

    Hebrews is trying to anticipate an objection that his readers might have had, How can you set aside the sacrifices of the law when they were what God wanted? I.e., they were God’s will. Instead, scripture itself (Psalm 40) says that God’s will was not for animal sacrifices, but for the sacrifice of a human “body.” Jesus truly fulfilled God’s will by making the correct sacrifice: not the sacrifices of the law, but the one sacrifice that conformed to the will of God.

    10:14 Once again Hebrews stresses, by sheer repetitive force, the singleness of Christ’s offering. Thus, by association, he is reminding us of the multiple offerings of the mosaic cult. While the previous development centered on the death and session of Christ himself, this verse focuses more on its meaning for believers. Christ’s offering is the means by which we are perfected. Since the perfection is of “those who are sanctified” (touj agiazomenouj), the ideas of perfection and sanctification that were developed earlier in this chapter are now more closely connected. The use of the present tense is probably a stylistic variation, although it may connote the ongoing effects of Christ’s offering for us.

    I’m failing to see where it says “Marty McPain is hereby free to do as he wishes, for he calls himself Christian. He cannot ever sin, even if what he does IS sin.”, care to show proof?

    Considering I’m of the Gnosis, I’m certainly more loyal to the word of Christ than you are. You’re just in it to protect yourself, make yourself look perfect. Wash your hands of every crime you’ve committed.

    Comment by Dio Brando — April 20, 2008 @ 1:15 am | Reply

  20. “Stop telling lies about me.

    Comment by Marty McPain — April 18, 2008 @ 9:23 pm”

    Any “lie” about you would be an improvement, the truth is the worst thing anyone could say about you. If there was ever a piece of crap heading for hell, you are it, you and every one of your sockpuppet fingers, since it has already been proven that corker and tabor are one and the same person, and the monitor here has admitted to being a sockpuppet and troll (not on purpose, of course, just out of his own stupidity, which the b4b crew is full of) I would like to know if God has forgiven all of the fingers on your sockpuppet, or just the mcpain finger.
    I may be in error about you being one of the Corker sockpuppet fingers, but I doubt it, although there is unrefutable proof here that corker and tabor are the same person, you have not yet been proven to be another one, but you did take the bait when I tried to pull corkers other fingers out into the open so I have no choice but to believe you are him too.
    You: forever saved. Yeah, right, think I’ll have myself a good laugh while you have yourself a glass of Koolaide.

    Comment by Arn — April 20, 2008 @ 7:23 am | Reply

  21. Comment by Arn — April 20, 2008 @ 7:23 am

    You nasty hairy drug-addled fool! I thought you had locked yourself in the sheep pen for a 20 day orgy! And yet you are here polluting our internets with your filth and your horrible friends.

    Please, cut off your fingers, .. I would be glad to help..

    Comment by Marty McPain — April 20, 2008 @ 12:59 pm | Reply

  22. You have my address, drop on by.

    Comment by Arn — April 20, 2008 @ 4:28 pm | Reply

  23. ITT: Troll gorges on the multitude of food placed at his feet.

    Comment by Elephant Bones — April 20, 2008 @ 8:01 pm | Reply

  24. Even if Arn were to have a 20-day orgy with sheep(quite an acknowledgement of stamina), that’d still be nowhere near as sinful as beating your daughter viciously, then having sex with her, Marty-boy.

    Comment by Dio Brando — April 20, 2008 @ 8:13 pm | Reply

  25. Thanks Dio, I have been known to have more than my share of stamina.😀

    Comment by Arn — April 21, 2008 @ 5:01 am | Reply

  26. Sheep…………sweet !

    Make sure you get a pretty one though…………..if you get it on its back in a low ditch, you can kiss it too !

    Comment by Pervy Gnome — April 21, 2008 @ 5:49 am | Reply

  27. LIES! All Lies!

    Yes I have chastised my daughter. Yes I have

    it would be alright if I offered her to a mob of strangers who were bothering my guests: GEN 19:8 or if she got me drunk and had sex with me GEN 19:30-38…

    but nowhere does it say in the bible that I shoudl have sex with my daughter, so I don’t do it. Period.

    and I’m sure Arn’s orgy involved mostly heavy petting and him making goo-goo eyes at the ewes and getting jumped by the rams.

    Comment by Marty McPain — April 21, 2008 @ 11:17 am | Reply

  28. Mister spanky McPain,
    If you were anything more than just a closet whacker maybe I would take you seriously. Perhaps if you were even a real person I would take you more seriously. But since you are nothing but a retarded idiot (or the sockpuppet finger of one) with no brain of your own, I have no choice but to ignore you because trying to say anything to a non-person is just a waste of time.
    Why don’t you just go join your pedophile buddy, brother Yates and quit trying to troll other people, we all know you’re scum already so you don’t need to offer us any further evidence.

    Comment by Arn — April 21, 2008 @ 2:16 pm | Reply

  29. Yes I have chastised my daughter. Yes I have

    it would be alright if I offered her to a mob of strangers who were bothering my guests: GEN 19:8 or if she got me drunk and had sex with me GEN 19:30-38…

    but nowhere does it say in the bible that I shoudl have sex with my daughter, so I don’t do it. Period.

    Bible says not to sin. You fail.

    Ah, but you admit to sexually abusing your daughter. Are we to believe she would be the one to get you drunk? Last, but not least, remind us again what happened to Lot.

    You’ve just lost in this game of wits to me, Dio. Does Lot’s fate look familiar to you, or being the idiot that you are, do all fates look the same?

    Comment by Dio Brando — April 21, 2008 @ 3:49 pm | Reply

  30. Dio said:

    You’ve just lost in this game of wits to me, Dio.

    So you just lost an argument with yourself? At least now we know who the crazy one is, Dio.

    Comment by Psycheout — April 21, 2008 @ 4:13 pm | Reply

  31. Psycheout right on cue with his failure to understand a basic sentence. You really should have considered finishing third grade before you dropped out.

    Comment by Elephant Bones — April 21, 2008 @ 4:23 pm | Reply

  32. Psycheout flunks basic English. And yes, that was said by the illiterate stinking hippie, me, Arn.
    And so on and so on and scooby dooby doo be,
    Oh hell, I need a joint.

    Comment by Arn — April 21, 2008 @ 6:06 pm | Reply

  33. So you just lost an argument with yourself? At least now we know who the crazy one is, Dio.

    English, motherf*cker, DO YOU SPEAK IT?

    Comment by Dio Brando — April 21, 2008 @ 8:57 pm | Reply

  34. “And so on and so on and scooby dooby doo be,”
    Ooh, sha sha

    Comment by Armand Jean du Plessis de Richelieu — April 21, 2008 @ 11:33 pm | Reply

  35. Egg Nog is horrible !

    Comment by Pervy Gnome — April 22, 2008 @ 2:04 am | Reply

  36. Talking of Scooby Doo………….Daphne has really got a great arse.

    [Admin: You’re getting into a whole weird area here, Pervy. Are you a furry? And please, no details on how furry you are or what you’d like to do with ice cream, thanks.]

    Comment by Pervy Gnome — April 22, 2008 @ 2:05 am | Reply

  37. No – I like my animals to be real………sheep preferably……….but a goat would be acceptable at a push (they’re somewhat less “passive” – you’ve gotta be careful).

    Back on subject though, I think I can categorically say that Betty Rubble would most definitely be absolutely filthy in the sack………….we’re talking about the sort of cartoon character that would give you a BJ while you’re taking a dump ! Yeehaa

    Comment by Pervy Gnome — April 22, 2008 @ 6:50 am | Reply

  38. “And so on and so on and scooby dooby doo be,”
    Ooh, sha sha”

    We got to live together.

    Comment by Arn — April 22, 2008 @ 8:56 am | Reply

  39. Pervy, I don’t know about you, but myself, I’ve always had the hots for Jessica Rabbit.

    Comment by Arn — April 22, 2008 @ 9:05 am | Reply

  40. Aye – Jessica Rabbit’s quite nice, and she’s definitely got the physical attributes to push back nice ‘n hard.

    Have to say though, Daisy Duck really does it for me…………something to do with those little upturned tail-feathers and the oversized high heels.

    Comment by Pervy Gnome — April 22, 2008 @ 10:08 am | Reply

  41. I-I-I am every day people.

    I have to disagree with you, Pervy. I think egg nog is delicious.
    And what are your opinions of the entire cast of Josie and the Pussycats?

    Comment by Armand Jean du Plessis de Richelieu — April 22, 2008 @ 6:48 pm | Reply

  42. There is a yellow one that won’t
    Accept the black one
    That won’t accept the red one
    That won’t accept the white one

    Comment by Arn — April 22, 2008 @ 7:05 pm | Reply

  43. Different strokes, for different folks

    Comment by Armand Jean du Plessis de Richelieu — April 22, 2008 @ 7:11 pm | Reply

  44. You do realise we are doing a black man’s song on a white supremist site😀

    Comment by Arn — April 22, 2008 @ 7:20 pm | Reply

  45. Yes, not only that, but one that calls for equality and understanding from and for everyone.

    Comment by Armand Jean du Plessis de Richelieu — April 22, 2008 @ 7:39 pm | Reply

  46. “Josie and the Pussycats” – never really watched it, but I’m sure they’re some damn fine looking birds !

    Now “Trollz” however – the young lady with the red spiky hair is wonderful – I’d like to have her buttocks mounted on my living room wall (just under waist hight would be perfect).

    “You do realise we are doing a black man’s song on a white supremist site” – just look at English rugby “supporters”………they only know one song and that’s a negro spiritual – they can’t sing, don’t know anything about rugby and their idea of entertainment is watching a rolling maul trundle up and down the pitch for hours on end while everyone else falls asleep – about as much use as tits on a fish !

    Comment by Pervy Gnome — April 23, 2008 @ 3:18 am | Reply

  47. Hey, tits on a fish could be useful, Corker could start making penguin tits with them.

    Comment by Arn — April 23, 2008 @ 3:59 am | Reply

  48. Tits on a penguin would be okay – I suspect that penguins are quite easy to catch, if you’re so minded and the libido aroused.

    Comment by Pervy Gnome — April 23, 2008 @ 6:23 am | Reply

  49. So you’re an ass man, gnome? I always have been myself.

    Comment by Armand Jean du Plessis de Richelieu — April 23, 2008 @ 10:43 pm | Reply

  50. Anywhere on a female (any species will do)that’s dark and vaguely moist will get me going…….armpit……….a crocked knee…..between a camel’s humps……🙂

    Comment by Pervy Gnome — April 24, 2008 @ 2:10 am | Reply

  51. Speaking of fish (or fish like species) I’ve heard a few women say that dolphins are very well endowed, so the female dolphins must be equally able to handle it. Just thought I’d throw that in, in case you’re, like, into the fisting thing or something.

    Comment by Arn — April 24, 2008 @ 8:51 am | Reply

  52. Whales are the benchmark really – I believe the male Sperm Whale’s manservant is somewhere around 5 feet in length and they chuck out a gallon or so of love-sludge each time they “erupt”………no wonder the sea is salty, eh…………..the female Sperm Whale must, therefore, be truly accomodating (to the extent that you could probably live in there !!!)

    Comment by Pervy Gnome — April 24, 2008 @ 10:29 am | Reply

  53. What an interesting change of subject this thread has experienced…

    Comment by Elephant Bones — April 24, 2008 @ 12:10 pm | Reply

  54. You’re right EB, but you have to admit that sex with fish is a better subject than anything psyche could ever come up with.

    Comment by Arn — April 24, 2008 @ 12:16 pm | Reply

  55. I reckon old psyche might have secret thoughts of “sexual relations” with Hillary Clinton – with or without a cigar………….you know the old adage about professions of hatred being tantamount to deeper-seated feelings of affection/love………

    …..or maybe it’s Bill that’s the object of his latent desires ????

    Comment by Pervy Gnome — April 25, 2008 @ 10:33 am | Reply

  56. Trust me, it’s Bill.

    Comment by Arn — April 25, 2008 @ 10:48 am | Reply

  57. “You’re right EB, but you have to admit that sex with fish is a better subject than anything psyche could ever come up with.”
    Tru dat.

    Comment by Elephant Bones — April 25, 2008 @ 11:21 am | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: