Blogs 4 Brownback

April 16, 2008

Latest Clinton Ad Having Little Impact

Filed under: Barack Obama,Democratic Idiocy,Democrats,Hillary Clinton — Psycheout @ 12:41 pm

Hitlery ClintonFeminazi Hitlery Clinton continues to go on the attack over Barry Osama’s elitist attack on rural folk who he looks down his nose at and it continues to have little or no impact. In fact she was recently booed off the stage for even bringing it up. The Clintons have always been very skilled at the art of political mudslinging and character assassination, but pointing out again and again and again and again and again that Obama is an elitist snob who thinks rural folk are morons isn’t scoring points for the other elitist snob, Hillary Clinton. Why? That’s simple.

Most Democrats already hate rural folks anyway, so they largely agree with the hellbeast on this one. But Shrillary seems to have forgotten that she is not running for the Republican nomination. If she were, the issue of what Islamobama said would have a lot more impact. But she’s not. And she seems to be less interested in running against John McCain than she does against Barry. In fact it seems like she’s trying take down her Democrat party opponent as if he were Vince Foster or one of the many other corpses buried by the Clinton death squads over the years.

Beating a Dead Horse
Hillary Clinton’s Latest Ad

Hillary is using the right strategy against the wrong opponent. Perhaps she is vying for the VP slot for John McCain. She certainly seems more interested in destroying Barry than her good friend JMac. But she can’t help it, she’s a Clinton, and that’s what these people have always been about. They are just as vicious and evil against their friends, if not more so, than they are against their enemies.

The Clintons would probably kill everyone in the United States if it meant that her shrillness could take her “rightful” place in the White House. It’s really sad, isn’t it? Billary has spent too long in the bowl that is American politics. It’s time to flush her down.

In the meantime someone needs to call animal control and rescue. Somebody needs to stop Hillary from beating that poor dead horse. Have you at long last no shame you vile feminazi? Sadly no.

B4B Fact: Those who “cling to” guns and religion don’t vote for DemocRATs anyway, as voters know that liberals want to take those things away.  It’s a fact.

— Psycheout

22 Comments »

  1. Congratulations for giving me a laugh at the .gif

    Comment by Elephant Bones — April 16, 2008 @ 1:09 pm | Reply

  2. You said it best Psycheoutt. I can’t believe that latté swilling fem-nazi is making this pretense about having any respect for hard working, God fearing Americans. I mean a good Christian woman doesn’t have someone murdered because they knocked her up in the one single hetrosexual act of their lives or keep an attractive American-South Asian woman as a bed warmer. Exactly what party is she running for a nomination from anyway? The We-Hate-Christ-and-America Democrats or the Republicans?

    Comment by BJ Tabor — April 16, 2008 @ 3:54 pm | Reply

  3. Happy V-Tech Day everyone! This is the date that Cho beat Eric and Dylan’s high score.

    Comment by eBaums Fag — April 16, 2008 @ 4:45 pm | Reply

  4. Thanks for that BJ. You can be sure that everything that comes out of Clintons’ collective mouths is a lie. If she were to say point blank that she didn’t gun down Vince Foster in cold blood, we could be sure that she absolutely did. She recently said that the last time she fired a gun wasn’t a significant issue and refused to answer. That’s probably because the last time she fired a gun was July 20, 1993. And we know how that turned out.

    eBaums Fag, the “compassion” of you and your ilk knows no bounds. If Cho’s fellow students were allowed to “cling to” their guns, Cho would have been shot death by outraged gun owners. Guns don’t kill people, gun free zones do.

    Comment by Psycheout — April 16, 2008 @ 5:55 pm | Reply

  5. If Cho’s fellow students were allowed to “cling to” their guns, Cho would have been shot death by outraged gun owners. Guns don’t kill people, gun free zones do.

    Or, if he had no guns to begin with, he could’ve just been restrained, and given his medicine, alongside more psych evaluations…

    Comment by Dio Brando — April 16, 2008 @ 10:23 pm | Reply

  6. Dio, don’t be an idiot. He had a gun in a gun free zone. The point is that gun free zones don’t work. In a gun free zone, only the criminals have guns. In a free drug zone, only the criminals have drugs.

    Get it? Got it. Good.

    It should be obvious who needs the psych evaluations around here…you!

    Comment by Psycheout — April 16, 2008 @ 10:58 pm | Reply

  7. I think that in a free drug zone, Woodstock would result.

    Comment by Armand Jean du Plessis de Richelieu — April 16, 2008 @ 11:09 pm | Reply

  8. He had a gun in a gun free zone. The point is that gun free zones don’t work.

    Okay, let’s use some -logic- (what a scary thought to you!). He bought guns. From a gun-happy zone. He brought guns. To a gun-free zone(because it’s not such a good idea to give EVERYONE a gun, lest one of them turn out to be a psychopath). If the nation were gun-free, and the police/feds managed to actually prevent/make it harder to acquire illegal sales of guns, Cho would’ve had an incredibly hard time.

    Here’s some food for thought:

    America has some of the leanest gun laws. The UK has some of the most restrictive. Guess which country has fewer gun-related deaths?

    Comment by Dio Brando — April 16, 2008 @ 11:57 pm | Reply

  9. Good luck on overturning the Second Amendment, moonbat. And who cares about the “UK” anyway? We broke away from the redcoats over 200 years ago because they hated the idea of the free exercise of religion (that’s the First Amendment, in case you didn’t know). And Britons have bad teeth. I bet American dentists could make a mint over there except for the socialist health care they have over there.

    Socialist healthcare == bad teeth? Makes you think, doesn’t it?

    Comment by Psycheout — April 17, 2008 @ 12:19 am | Reply

  10. But we’re getting a bit off topic. Hillary Clinton: beating a dead (negro) horse or not? DISCUSS.

    Comment by Psycheout — April 17, 2008 @ 12:19 am | Reply

  11. We broke away from the redcoats over 200 years ago because they hated the idea of the free exercise of religion (that’s the First Amendment, in case you didn’t know). And Britons have bad teeth. I bet American dentists could make a mint over there except for the socialist health care they have over there

    Funny how you essentially concede to my point by avoiding it like a schoolboy.

    Actually, British toothpaste contains more fluoride, perhaps because the water lacks it. Says something more about brushing habits. Of course, bad teeth IS a stereotype. I know many cute British women who have perfect teeth.

    But we’re getting a bit off topic. Hillary Clinton: beating a dead (negro) horse or not? DISCUSS.

    Are you suggesting that the “negro” should be beaten to death?

    Comment by Dio Brando — April 17, 2008 @ 2:05 am | Reply

  12. Oh, before I forget– do you mind if I report this site to the FBI for the numerous terrorist threats made by you and the other staff over the past year or so? I like to ask before I turn anyone over to my pals.

    Comment by Dio Brando — April 17, 2008 @ 2:08 am | Reply

  13. I don’t trust Hillary for one simple reason: It is clear that she lusts for power. Anyone who desires the power that the office of the president involves, does not deserve that power. And when you’ve spent 8 years as First Lady, and 6 more years as a Senator, there’s only one reason you would want to be president. The power.

    Comment by L — April 17, 2008 @ 9:44 am | Reply

  14. They all want the power L it’s what they want to do with it that’s what counts. It’s pretty clear Hillary wants to be president just to avenge herself on anyone who crossed her and then go a blood crazed rampage.

    Comment by BJ Tabor — April 17, 2008 @ 9:54 am | Reply

  15. “Oh, before I forget– do you mind if I report this site to the FBI for the numerous terrorist threats made by you and the other staff over the past year or so?”
    The party van isn’t going to take them seriously. wordpress labeled them as a parody.

    Comment by Elephant Bones — April 17, 2008 @ 10:31 am | Reply

  16. The party van isn’t going to take them seriously. wordpress labeled them as a parody.

    I do have a few strings to pull, actually. Having family in military sectors, and a couple of contacts in higher echelons– I could do it, but it would be rather over-the-top.

    I think there may be a lower-level group to report B4B to, if I’m not mistaken. Can’t remember right now, though.

    Comment by Dio Brando — April 17, 2008 @ 8:25 pm | Reply

  17. Dio, you mentioned how England has much lower rates of gun crime, and yes that is true. You should look up the term “Hot Burglary”. In the US, approximately 10% of break ins to homes occur with the occupants there. This is usually by accident as homes tend to targeted that the residents aren’t around. In England, and Whales particularly, the opposite is true. The rates of home invasions occurring while the home is occupied is more than 50% of all break ins and it looks like this rate is set to continue to climb. In England, gangs now work in teams to basically kidnap homeowners and their families in their home, getting pin and account information, holding the hostage while another in the gang uses that info to empty accounts. Obviously this does not occur in the US as gun ownership is much easier meaning the likelihood of a defenseless homeowner is less.

    England does have much lower crime, but their other crimes, in particular, unarmed and armed assaults not involving a gun are much higher than the US. Also rather shocking is that they have a much higher rate of crime against minorities and immigrants than here in the US. England isn’t exactly the model of a peaceful society you see in the movies. Not everyone there is Hugh Grant.

    Comment by Diablo — April 18, 2008 @ 9:26 am | Reply

  18. Alright, I admit it, I laughed at the “dead horse beating” joke there.

    Comment by TrogdortheEnilghtened — April 18, 2008 @ 12:24 pm | Reply

  19. In England, gangs now work in teams to basically kidnap homeowners and their families in their home, getting pin and account information, holding the hostage while another in the gang uses that info to empty accounts. Obviously this does not occur in the US as gun ownership is much easier meaning the likelihood of a defenseless homeowner is less.

    Actually, we just get to skip the invasion, and instead have our personal data stolen– or sold off.

    England is also more packed in urban areas, as a note.

    If you want a better example, look up Japan. No guns, incredibly low crime rates. Hell, the cops don’t even NEED guns.

    Also rather shocking is that they have a much higher rate of crime against minorities and immigrants than here in the US. England isn’t exactly the model of a peaceful society you see in the movies. Not everyone there is Hugh Grant.

    I never said they were peaceful, just that the rates of gun violence are vastly lower than ours. Not every gun-owning homeowner fires only in the name of protection. Plenty of gang violence and drive-bys all around, no?

    I know damn well that England has plenty of bigots– I prefer the US for good reason. And that’s something we need to take to heart– our general consensus of freedom and equality. That’s something we used to pride ourselves on. But no longer do we do that, since the Bush administration had a drive to oppress Americans and strip many of their rights(be it through marriage bans, approval of outsourcing, allowing corrupt and mismanaged corporations to carry on and SUPPORTING THEM). Instead we moved to “WE ARE DEMOCRATIC”. It’s as if “Land of the Free” suddenly came with an asterisk.

    Comment by Dio Brando — April 18, 2008 @ 2:01 pm | Reply

  20. “I do have a few strings to pull, actually. Having family in military sectors, and a couple of contacts in higher echelons– I could do it, but it would be rather over-the-top.”
    Oh, but I’d rather you didn’t, it’s such an amusing site.

    “If you want a better example, look up Japan. No guns, incredibly low crime rates. Hell, the cops don’t even NEED guns.”
    To be fair, their culture has something to do with it as well.

    Comment by Elephant Bones — April 18, 2008 @ 10:43 pm | Reply

  21. We broke away from the redcoats over 200 years ago because they hated the idea of the free exercise of religion

    Sigh, all I can say is: LEARN YOUR HISTORY, MORON!

    The original pilgrims went over due to religious seggregation, but the revolution was mainly fought because *grasp* the english actually wanted their colony to be profitable and *grasp* taxed it.

    PS: Those who cling to guns and religion have a name: Terrorists.

    And Britons have bad teeth.

    1. Cliche´s for the win. Really, this one´s the oldest dead horse that turned out to bunk (at least concerning the british) evar.
    2. What exactly has that to do with gun control? Or where you just randomly attacking another country to actually make a point at all as you´re seemingly out of arguments?

    But the .gif is positively hilarious.

    Comment by PG — April 19, 2008 @ 1:08 pm | Reply

  22. To be fair, their culture has something to do with it as well.

    Of course, though laws do have an effect on culture(the US and “freedom”, as openly granted).

    Comment by Dio Brando — April 19, 2008 @ 8:53 pm | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: