Blogs 4 Brownback

March 4, 2008

Vermont Women Unite to Repeal Womens’ Suffrage!


Looks like some women have finally caught on to the horror of womens’ suffrage. I smell the beginnings of a Christian movement, here. If so many college-educated women in the most depraved and liberal state this side of California can see the light about the horrendous nature of allowing women to vote, there’s still hope that America can repeal that Amendment, save women from the nightmare of enfranchisement, and restore them to the freedom of the domestic roles for which God intended them.

God bless America, and free our women from the onerous burdens Satanist secularists have imposed on them.

41 Comments »

  1. I think they’re just showing that people don’t know what suffrage means. This has been done plenty of times in the past

    Comment by Elephant Bones — March 4, 2008 @ 12:14 pm | Reply

  2. Brother Sisyphus and Brethren, we are living in the End Times! Liberal women have succomb to wonton desires and assumed positions in the workplace to usurp the man’s authority. We have got to stand strong and remain firm in our efforts to preserve our Traditional Family Values at any cost until the King returns to claim us!

    Comment by Mrs. T.D. Gaines-Crockett — March 4, 2008 @ 12:15 pm | Reply

  3. “we are living in the End Times!”
    Your people have been saying that since Jesus ascended.

    “We have got to stand strong and remain firm in our efforts to preserve our Traditional Family Values at any cost”
    Does ‘any cost’ involve killing any ‘uppity’ women? Sounds like something you’d do.

    “until the King returns to claim us!”
    Been 2000 years, and you’re still making it sounds like the Apocalypse is going to happen sometime next month.

    Comment by Elephant Bones — March 4, 2008 @ 12:53 pm | Reply

  4. “Been 2000 years, and you’re still making it sounds like the Apocalypse is going to happen sometime next month.”

    Didn’t you know EB? It is going to happen next month.

    On the 23rd.

    Comment by The One — March 4, 2008 @ 1:17 pm | Reply

  5. What´s this whole idiocity about? RIght to vote doesn´t mean duty to vote. If those women don´t want to vote, they don´t have to. Others DO want it, though, and trying to repeal women´s suffrage is interfearing with their rights. Wich is something I did not exspect from the so-called land of the free.

    restore them to the freedom of the domestic roles for which God intended them.

    They still have that freedom. Some women just decide not to use it. Get in your head that freedom doesn´t equal duty.

    Otherwise, the video just shows that some off those women were simply to badly educated to actually know the term suffrage at all.
    It certainly doesn´t show any kind of organisation, which means that your article title is nothing but a blatant lie.

    we are living in the End Times!

    That has been said about a million times too often. Anyone with 2 or more working braincells should only believe that when it actually does start to rain fire and brimstone everyywhere on the planet.

    Didn’t you know EB? It is going to happen next month.

    On the 23rd.

    You mean the 15th´s of this month, right? Well, at least for Scientology.🙂

    Comment by PG — March 4, 2008 @ 1:24 pm | Reply

  6. It snowed in Alabama. I think that definitely means Hell is frozen over. Can’t be too long now, can it?😉

    Comment by La Mona — March 4, 2008 @ 1:38 pm | Reply

  7. Thank Heaven these women have seen the Light! With the Lord’s help, President Brownback will surely succeed in the great effort to repeal womens’ suffrage!

    Comment by Marcia P. — March 4, 2008 @ 2:04 pm | Reply

  8. Praise Jesus our nation’s womanhood is finally starting to escape from under the thumb of the fridged man-hating, fem-nazis! To think of the countless thousands of women who have been forced out of their homes and into unnatural working environments just to satisfy a small cabal depraved appetite for women dressed in men’s pants. Repealing the woman’s so called right to vote will be a first step in getting our beloved wives, daughters, sisters and mothers back into the loving embrace of their kitchen were they belong!

    Comment by BJ Tabor — March 4, 2008 @ 2:15 pm | Reply

  9. Dear La Mona,

    You have me laughing so hard I nearly spilled tea on my brand new desk. Now you run out there and make a snow man for Auntie Crockett!

    Brother BJ and Sister Marcia P.,

    I too am saddened by the state of the young women in America today. If it’s not slacks it’s a skirt so short you can see their unmentionables. This loose Liberal morality starts in the home and in public schools. Thank God our own children will not be exposed to such harlotry and worldly ways.

    Come Quick, Jesus! America is on fire for a Rapture!

    Comment by Mrs. T.D. Gaines-Crockett — March 4, 2008 @ 2:22 pm | Reply

  10. “It is going to happen next month.

    On the 23rd.”
    Oh crap, I better start packing.

    “Praise Jesus our nation’s womanhood is finally starting to escape from under the thumb of the fridged man-hating, fem-nazis! To think of the countless thousands of women who have been forced out of their homes and into unnatural working environments just to satisfy a small cabal depraved appetite for women dressed in men’s pants. Repealing the woman’s so called right to vote will be a first step in getting our beloved wives, daughters, sisters and mothers back into the loving embrace of their kitchen were they belong!”
    tl;dr version – gb2/kitchen/

    Comment by Elephant Bones — March 4, 2008 @ 2:37 pm | Reply

  11. “I too am saddened by the state of the young women in America today. If it’s not slacks it’s a skirt so short you can see their unmentionables. This loose Liberal morality starts in the home and in public schools. Thank God our own children will not be exposed to such harlotry and worldly ways.”

    Amen! Rapture Thy Chosen and consign Thy foes to flickering Hellfire, O Lord of Hosts!

    She who wears a skirt above the shin or goes forth in public with her chest unstrapped shall soon find the demons of Damnation molesting her secret places.

    Comment by Sisyphus — March 4, 2008 @ 2:38 pm | Reply

  12. How foolish of you, Sisypuss. While you are frittering away your time by posting this satire, anonymous is still gathering its troops to expose you. How unpredictable.

    Comment by anonymouslulz404 — March 4, 2008 @ 3:29 pm | Reply

  13. “How foolish of you, Sisypuss. While you are frittering away your time by posting this satire, anonymous is still gathering its troops to expose you. How unpredictable.”

    The Lord is with me. He is my towering shield. Anonymous moonbat trolls are of little consequence in comparison.

    Comment by Sisyphus — March 4, 2008 @ 3:41 pm | Reply

  14. “Does ‘any cost’ involve killing any ‘uppity’ women? Sounds like something you’d do”

    No Elephant Brain, that’s want you want to do, except you are too afraid of going outside and too busy stuffing cheetos into your fat mouth to do anything about it….

    Comment by Marty McPain — March 4, 2008 @ 3:52 pm | Reply

  15. The clock is wound tight.

    Comment by anonymouslulz408 — March 4, 2008 @ 6:10 pm | Reply

  16. “The Lord is with me. He is my towering shield.”
    Translation: I’m using my religion as an excuse to attack people.

    Comment by Elephant Bones — March 4, 2008 @ 7:26 pm | Reply

  17. Nevermind how that video is:

    -labeled under comedy
    -is a jab at how the average person doesn’t know that suffrage =/= suffering.

    We’re just gonna be complete idiots and claim that women want to vote to repeal their voting rights!

    We have got to stand strong and remain firm in our efforts to preserve our Traditional Family Values at any cost until the King returns to claim us!

    Shut the f*ck up, because without women’s rights, you have no say. Get back in the kitchen, make some f*cking sandwiches, and have more sex in the missionary position for the purpose of recreation. I would slap you, but I’m sure your husband is a rightful christian, and does it for me.

    To think of the countless thousands of women who have been forced out of their homes and into unnatural working environments just to satisfy a small cabal depraved appetite for women dressed in men’s pants.

    So, if women aren’t allowed to work, are you going to magically reduce the cost of umm…EVERYTHING so that only the husband need work? What about husbands that die, or run out?

    No Elephant Brain, that’s want you want to do, except you are too afraid of going outside and too busy stuffing cheetos into your fat mouth to do anything about it….

    Funny, wife-beating and being a fat retard is your specialty.

    Comment by Dio Brando — March 4, 2008 @ 8:04 pm | Reply

  18. HUCKABEE QUIT! GOD HATES AMERICA!!! WOOHOO!!!

    Comment by TrogdortheEnlightened — March 4, 2008 @ 9:46 pm | Reply

  19. “too busy stuffing cheetos into your fat mouth”
    I believe you mean Cheez-its. Cheetos leave too much cheese dust on my fingers, and I like to keep my keyboard clean.

    Comment by Elephant Bones — March 4, 2008 @ 9:48 pm | Reply

  20. Huckabee finally learned what “big numbers” means.

    Comment by Dio Brando — March 4, 2008 @ 11:58 pm | Reply

  21. “under the thumb of the fridged man-hating, fem-nazis!”
    I thought that Feminists were generally anti-appliance. Unless of course you meant “frigid”.

    Comment by Armand Jean du Plessis de Richelieu — March 5, 2008 @ 12:02 am | Reply

  22. “HUCKABEE QUIT! GOD HATES AMERICA!!! WOOHOO!!!”
    This has given me more hope for America than anything else on this blog ever.

    Comment by Armand Jean du Plessis de Richelieu — March 5, 2008 @ 12:04 am | Reply

  23. Also, I shall repeat what the others have stated, you have purposefully chosen a humor video showcasing people’s ignorance and relabeled it for your own intents. It’s really quite silly.
    It’d be similar to me using the classic bicycle safety video ‘One Grew Fat’ as evidence as to why evolution is a sound concept. Clearly, this would be foolish.

    Comment by Armand Jean du Plessis de Richelieu — March 5, 2008 @ 12:08 am | Reply

  24. “under the thumb of the fridged man-hating, fem-nazis!”
    They must be pretty cold if they’ve been fridged.

    “It’d be similar to me using the classic bicycle safety video ‘One Grew Fat’ as evidence as to why evolution is a sound concept. Clearly, this would be foolish.”
    Well, if YOU did it, then it’d be foolish. But the B4B staff aren’t governed by universal rules of common sense and basic intelligence, so it’d be perfectly alright for them. It’s not like they know any better.

    Comment by Elephant Bones — March 5, 2008 @ 12:29 am | Reply

  25. They gots them a edumacation from piggy. aw gosh, piggy always gets the ansers rite.

    Comment by Dio Brando — March 5, 2008 @ 1:18 am | Reply

  26. “It’d be similar to me using the classic bicycle safety video ‘One Grew Fat’ as evidence as to why evolution is a sound concept. Clearly, this would be foolish.”

    Or perhaps, using “Reefer Madness” as a serious documentary on the dangers of marijuana.

    Comment by The One — March 5, 2008 @ 7:09 am | Reply

  27. “They gots them a edumacation from piggy.”
    No, pigs are intelligent.

    Comment by Elephant Bones — March 5, 2008 @ 7:48 am | Reply

  28. For any idiot feminists that think that women need ‘careers’ or ‘suffrage’. Women should be chatells. The Bible is very clear on this, and the countries most united had their women in their places.

    Comment by bobcorker — March 5, 2008 @ 5:34 pm | Reply

  29. For any idiot feminists that think that women need ‘careers’ or ’suffrage’.

    And earlier I said:

    So, if women aren’t allowed to work, are you going to magically reduce the cost of umm…EVERYTHING so that only the husband need work? What about husbands that die, or run out?

    Comment by Dio Brando — March 5, 2008 @ 6:15 pm | Reply

  30. “For any idiot feminists that think that women need ‘careers’ or ’suffrage’.”

    Hmmm, to think of countries that “put women in their place”…you’re not in good company Corker.

    Comment by La Mona — March 6, 2008 @ 8:01 am | Reply

  31. “Hmmm, to think of countries that “put women in their place”…you’re not in good company Corker.”

    The book I linked to was written by a woman. Women best know how to spread the news that feminism is a lie, as they handle it with a certain sensitivity men are incapable of. Upcoming feminists need sensitive people in their lives, and fast. She seems to agree with my statements, as well.

    “So, if women aren’t allowed to work, are you going to magically reduce the cost of umm…EVERYTHING so that only the husband need work? What about husbands that die, or run out?”

    Churches will be the only charities allowed to exist, yet every church is obligated to have a charity. If people ask, they shall receive (unless it’s something unreasonable, like a Ferrari Testarossa). Married women in families that are overworked are welcome to use these charities. Unmarried women shall become owned by the state until they can find a husband that they know they won’t divorce.

    Comment by bobcorker — March 6, 2008 @ 5:46 pm | Reply

  32. “Unmarried women shall become owned by the state until they can find a husband that they know they won’t divorce.”
    Bob, you’re a wonderful human being. Really. Just give yourself a pat on the back for being so considerate.
    /sarcasm

    Comment by Elephant Bones — March 6, 2008 @ 6:14 pm | Reply

  33. Churches will be the only charities allowed to exist, yet every church is obligated to have a charity.

    Hey idiot, a charity needs funding to exist.

    Also, you contradict yourself:

    Married women in families that are overworked are welcome to use these charities

    For any idiot feminists that think that women need ‘careers’ or ’suffrage’. Women should be chatells

    First off, you’re referring to “chattel”, which means “slave”. You contradict because with your charity idea, overworked women are to use a magical charity with magical funding. But you also say that women are to be slaves. This means they cannot be paid at all, and are merely property. Women who lose their husbands, either due to death or the husband running out are thus to be given to the state to sell to someone else, likely losing their children in the process. They cannot use any charity, for that would be admission on the part of the state that slavery is not in effect.

    You fail.

    Comment by Dio Brando — March 6, 2008 @ 7:46 pm | Reply

  34. “Hey idiot, a charity needs funding to exist.”

    90% of our 10% sales tax (the only tax) will be required to go to churches through government. It should be enough for the government to fund the military as well. Anything else is just useless: churches run governments better than governors or legislators do.

    “You contradict because with your charity idea, overworked women are to use a magical charity with magical funding. But you also say that women are to be slaves. This means they cannot be paid at all, and are merely property.”

    Are you dumber than Charles Barkley? If the husband gives the wife permission to be the transport vector of the charity goods, how does this violate her status as a chattel?

    “Women who lose their husbands, either due to death or the husband running out are thus to be given to the state to sell to someone else, likely losing their children in the process.”

    If the kids are under 18, they are obligated to serve their mother, and thus must be her servant. To force children away from their mothers is anti-family, something which welfare queens such as yourself desire. Children must be subordinate to their mothers, for otherwise, sinful qualities will develop in the children.

    Comment by bobcorker — March 6, 2008 @ 9:40 pm | Reply

  35. 90% of our 10% sales tax (the only tax) will be required to go to churches through government. It should be enough for the government to fund the military as well. Anything else is just useless: churches run governments better than governors or legislators do.

    Oh no, if you want only a nationwide sales tax, you need to hike it up. Who decides which churches get tax money, and how much for each? What are the criteria? What, “Christian only”? Well, which part? I want you to list every form of Christianity that would be applicable.

    Also, there is to be no money in case of an emergency, or to fund police, paramedics, firefighters, courts, hospitals, doctors, water treatment, electric, airports, and more? So only churches and a military? Are you really so stupid as to suggest that that’s all we need?

    I sure hope you never have a medical emergency, should your plan come to fruition.

    Comment by Dio Brando — March 6, 2008 @ 11:15 pm | Reply

  36. “I want you to list every form of Christianity that would be applicable.”
    His, of course

    “Also, there is to be no money in case of an emergency, or to fund police, paramedics, firefighters, courts, hospitals, doctors, water treatment, electric, airports, and more?”
    He thinks if bad things happen, it’s because wants them to die. That scratches firefighters and medical professionals. He only ever promotes execution as punishment, so no need for police, just executioners. He won’t need courts in his perfect world, if you’re accused, you’re guilty, and by extension, dead. No need for airports, that’s just temptation for terrorists or anyone with a beard.

    “So only churches and a military?”
    Weapons of death and religious fanatics to use them. Sounds like Corker’s perfect world.

    “Are you really so stupid as to suggest that that’s all we need?”
    Well, duh.

    “churches run governments better than governors or legislators do.”
    Yeah, because the theocracies in the Middle East are just working out SO WELL, right?

    Comment by Elephant Bones — March 6, 2008 @ 11:54 pm | Reply

  37. churches run governments better than governors or legislators do.

    The historic precedent, known as the Dark Ages, tends to differ…

    Unmarried women shall become owned by the state until they can find a husband that they know they won’t divorce.

    Ahhh, state-induced slavery. Another fine thing proven NOT to be working all that good in the Dark Ages.

    Corker, if you´re such a fan of those concepts, do us a favor and move to North Korea. They have just the kind of government that fits you.

    All this leaves out the fact that the huge majority of non-christians and moderate christians would skin any government trying that kind of idiocity alive. (And if you get that fine idea of letting the troops loose on those, forget about it, they are also non-christian or moderate christian for the vast majority and won´t fight their own families.)

    Comment by PG — March 7, 2008 @ 7:05 am | Reply

  38. “The book I linked to was written by a woman. Women best know how to spread the news that feminism is a lie, as they handle it with a certain sensitivity men are incapable of. Upcoming feminists need sensitive people in their lives, and fast. She seems to agree with my statements, as well.”

    My comment asked you to think of the countries that “put women in their place.” Think of some that restrict the rights of women…who are you thinking of? Again, you’re in bad company.

    One person agreeing with you means nothing… There are many others that don’t, and they are women and therefore (by your logic) must know what’s best because they are women and certainly know what is best for them. Oh yea, the men agree too.

    Not to mention that your plans would never work…because government is structured in a certain way so that nutjobs such as yourself can’t screw it over to that degree. PG, Elephant Bones, and Dio have already pointed this out beautifully.

    Comment by La Mona — March 7, 2008 @ 8:30 am | Reply

  39. Actually, these women think they’re protesting women suffering. ;P

    People who aren’t smart enough to vote have a tendency to not show up on election day, either because they figure “my vote won’t count,” because they can’t remember where their polling place is, or because it never dawned on them that they have to REGISTER to vote.

    Comment by L — March 7, 2008 @ 9:42 am | Reply

  40. Yet again, L provides the voice of reason that is sadly ignored by the WASPS

    Comment by Elephant Bones — March 7, 2008 @ 12:15 pm | Reply

  41. Hey, now, not all WASPs are lacking in intelligence and common sense. My mom’s a former WASP. (She converted to Catholicism when she married my dad.)

    Comment by L — March 12, 2008 @ 2:57 pm | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: