Blogs 4 Brownback

February 18, 2008

Womens’ Suffrage: An Idea Whose Time Has Gone

When women vote...The real problem with American elections isn’t just that we don’t have adequate voter verification procedures to keep our leaders from being chosen by illegal aliens and terrorists with blood on their hands and axes to grind. The problem goes much further than that. Clearly, as the results of the past 90 years have tended to show, granting women the right to vote was a serious mistake.

Women have always found their proper role tending the hearth and home, as well as breeding future generations of decent Christians and proud warriors. God Himself speaks of such matters in the Bible. A society that allows women to usurp the roles of men is a society that will exchange slavery for freedom. In other words, a liberal society.

Back in 1911, California was still a decent, freedom-loving, Christian state. During the debate on whether or not to listen to the harlots and allow them to corrupt decent God-fearing women by granting them the right to vote, Democratic Caucus head J.D. Sanford made the following points:

Votes for WomenSuffrage is not a right. It is a privilege that may or may not be granted. Politics is no place for a women consequently the privilege should not be granted to her.

The mother’s influence is needed in the home. She can do little good by gadding the streets and neglecting her children. Let her teach her daughters that modesty, patience, and gentleness are the charms of a women. Let her teach her sons that an honest conscience is every man’s first political law; that no splendor can rob him nor no force justify the surrender of the simplest right of a free and independent citizen. The mothers of this country can shape the destinies of the nation by keeping in their places and attending to those duties that God Almighty intended for them. The kindly, gentle influence of the mother in the home and the dignified influence of the teacher in the school will far outweigh all the influence of all the mannish female politicians on earth.

The courageous, chivalrous, and manly men and the womanly women, the real mothers and home builders of the country, are opposed to this innovation in American political life. There was a bill (the Sanford bill) before the last legislature which proposed to leave the equal suffrage question to women to decide first before the men should vote on it. This bill was defeated by the suffragettes because they knew that the women would vote down the amendment by a vote of ten to one.

The men are able to run the government and take care of the women. Do women have to vote in order to receive the protection of man? Why, men have gone to war, endured every privation and death itself in defense of woman. To man, woman is the dearest creature on earth, and there is no extreme to which he would not go for his mother or sister. By keeping woman in her exalted position man can be induced to do more for her than he could by having her mix up in affairs that will cause him to lose respect and regard for her. Woman does not have to vote to secure her rights. Man will go to any extreme to protect and elevate her now. As long as woman is woman and keeps her place she will get more protection and more consideration than man gets. When she abdicates her throne she throws down the scepter of her power and loses her influence.

Woman suffrage has been proven a failure in states that have tried it. It is wrong. California should profit by the mistakes of other states. Not one reform has equal suffrage effected. On the contrary, statistics go to show that in most equal suffrage states, Colorado particularly, that divorces have greatly increased since the adoption of the equal suffrage amendment, showing that it has been a home destroyer. Crime has also increased due to lack of the mothers in the home.

Woman is woman. She can not unsex herself or change her sphere. Let her be content with her lot and perform those high duties intended for her by the Great Creator, and she will accomplish far more in governmental affairs that she can ever accomplish by mixing up in the dirty pool of politics. Keep the home pure and all will be well with the Republic. Let not the sanctity of the home be invaded by every little politician that may be running up and down the highway for office. Let the manly men and the womanly women defeat this amendment and keep woman where she belongs in order that she may retain the respect of all mankind.

Back then, Democrats were still Americans, not harlots and those who lust after harlots. Hillary Clinton buttresses every statement Sanford made, and her own utterances provide further support for the repeal of the 19th Amendment.

Hillary ClintonTake, for example, this insanity, uttered by Hillary Clinton on the very subject at hand, taken from her own blog:

I could say that it’s a pleasure being up here with all of the women running for President in 2008. But I’d like to make a prediction: that while there may be plenty of room on this stage tonight — some day, there will be enough of us to transform this event from a lecture into a debate.

I hope so. Because women have no place in politics, and the American people deserve to see that Truth and not have a female Fascist president shoved down their throats.

[Applause]

Yeah, right.

Finally, I want to thank the members of Mary Louise Smith’s family who have joined us tonight. Talk about a trailblazing woman in public life. Mary Louise Smith started at the grassroots right here in Iowa, working her way up to become the first woman Chair of the Republican National Committee. This was not an easy feat for a woman in 1974. But with her signature poise, and her intelligence and integrity, Mary Louise Smith proved to be more than up to the challenge.

RINO harlots, an inspiration to the Socialists among us. Proof positive that allowing these closet leftists in the GOP is the worst decision Reagan ever made. The Eleventh Commandment was the great error that gave the Democrat Party its 2006 electoral victory.

In addition to being an accomplished organizer and leader, she was also a passionate advocate for women’s rights, reproductive choice, and many other important causes. She was a role model and an inspiration for many, and I am honored by this chair that bears her name.

Naming a chair after her is appropriate. Woman is man’s footstool, just as Man is God’s.

And of course, there is this Center’s namesake, the great Carrie Chapman Catt. I and every other woman who holds this chair does so in part because of her life’s work. Raised right here in Iowa, a graduate of this university, she served as a teacher, a school principal, a superintendent, and a reporter before joining the women’s suffrage movement and realizing her talents as a gifted organizer and dynamic orator.

Banter banter banter. Boring platitudes. Yada yada yada. How can you people support this woman?

She did two stints as President of the National American Woman Suffrage Association and she helped to found the International Woman Suffrage Alliance to reach out to women across the world. In the end, it was Catt who devised the “Winning Plan” for the suffrage movement — a plan to campaign simultaneously for suffrage at both the state and national levels. The rest, as they say, is history.

If we’d had a real President instead of Woodrow Wilson, she’d have been arrested and shot as a traitor.

And it really is quite a history, isn’t it? There has never been a better time to be a woman in America. It’s almost hard to explain to young women today how much things have changed — even just during the course of my lifetime.

Women were better off when they enjoyed the liberty of keeping a decent home, raising decent Americans, and not having to go out and toil in the world of men and harlots. Anyone who’s read the Bible cover to cover knows this, Hillary. What are you really saying, here?

Growing up, there were sports we couldn’t play, schools we couldn’t attend, and jobs that essentially had a “men only” sign on them.

Well, we can’t go into the “women’s only” restroom, but you don’t hear us complaining, do you?

As an eighth grader I was captivated by space-travel. I wrote to NASA asking how to apply to be an astronaut — they wrote back explaining that these positions weren’t open to women.

Hillary ClintonQuite right. NASA is a hoax. The astronauts fly the shuttle into the desert, then spend the time in “space” gambling and patronizing brothels at taxpayer expense. Even those degenerate perverts and inveterate liars wouldn’t want Hillary Clinton tagging along. She’d spoil all their fornications.

Well today, Iowa’s own Peggy Whitson has been appointed the first female Commander of the International Space Station.

[Applause]

Yes, lemmings. Applaud the shameless lies. It’s the best you deserve.

Years later, when I was deciding where I wanted to attend law school, I was coolly informed by a Harvard Law professor, and I quote, “We don’t need any more women at Harvard.” So I went to Yale. [laughter] And my entering class at Yale Law School — where I decided to go instead — had 235 students, of whom just 27 were women.

This may be the first time I’ve ever agreed with a decision of Harvard Law School.

Today, women are the majority of students in law schools.

Everything you ever needed to know about what’s wrong with the legal profession today.

As a young lawyer, when I told a colleague that I might want to practice courtroom law, he replied that, that was impossible, because I didn’t have a wife. He asked me, “When you’re in trial, and you’re busy, who will make sure you have clean socks for court?” [laughter] Well, I had honestly had never thought about that. I had always washed my own socks. [laughter]

And now, you could have a “wife,” since you perverts have legalized Sodomy. That’s the kind of progress that will have America legalizing human sacrifice in the next 35 years.

Today, women are serving across America as judges, partners, as law professors — and yes, even successful courtroom lawyers with clean socks.

I highly doubt their socks are as clean as they were in the days when decent Christian women tidied them for their menfolk.

The norms are changing on Capitol Hill. Back in the mid-1980s, women were not allowed to wear pantsuits on the Senate floor. Clearly, I would not have survived. [laughter]

Finally, she tells the truth about something!

And today, we’ve sworn in the first Madame Speaker of the House of Representatives.

[Applause]

We’ve even seen, much I’m sure to that old Harvard law professor’s chagrin, the first woman President of Harvard University.

Harvard should hang the American flag at half-mast. If they haven’t burned it yet, that is.

Women are now a majority of students in colleges — and the majority of those who voted in 2004. It is nothing short of breathtaking when you stop to think about it.

Thank God we still outnumber them. Enough decent women know to vote for the party that represents them in Christ.

But all of this progress is not a quirk of fate. It didn’t happen by accident. It is the result of the contributions of women and men from every background, serving at every level, using their diverse array of skills and talents to move our nation forward.

Moving our nation “forward” on the path to Hell is apparently not a problem to President-Never-Elect Hillary.

Contributions from national leaders like Carrie Chapman Catt and her colleagues in the suffrage movement. Trailblazers right here in Iowa like Arabella Mansfield who, in 1869, became the first woman in America formally admitted to the Bar. Women like Sojourner Truth who campaigned both against slavery and for women’s suffrage. Or Harriet Tubman who risked her life time and again so others could taste the fruits of freedom. Courageous women around the world like Aung San Suu Kyi who has been a virtual prisoner for decades in the cause of freedom for the Burmese people. Women who run for office in their own countries against some tough odds like Angela Merkel in Germany and Michelle Bachelet in Chile, and Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf in Liberia.

SneezeHalf those names sound like mens’ names, and the other half sound made up. “Aung San Suu Kyi”? Gesundheit!

But it is not just the women leaders in the history books who’ve made history. It is also those unsung heroes who transform lives and communities every single day.

The teachers who tell our daughters, “You are just as smart and capable as the boys, don’t you fail to live up to your potential.” I think about my 6th grade teacher Mrs. King quoting from the Bible said not to hide your light under the bushel basket.

The Bible also says, “for indeed man was not created for the woman’s sake, but (A)woman for the man’s sake.” (1 Corinthians 11:9) I guess Hillary’d rather quote the Good Book out of context than actually read the thing. Typical Satanism.

The women on the PTA who wonder why aren’t more girls in those honors math and science classes. I remember when my daughter was in first grade joining up with a couple of other mothers to do extra science programs for our first graders. And all those mothers who work all day — sleep a few hours — do the night shift, because they want something better for their children.

Then they should work at home, tending hearth and home. The men should work outside in the world; women are far too susceptible to temptations, and children sense something is wrong now, too, which is why they now play video games all day instead of reading Scripture with their mothers.

Some women have fought lonely battles, forging ahead on their own when no one else would stand by their side. I think of Edna Griffin, called the “Rosa Parks of Iowa.” On July 7, 1948, she was refused service at a Des Moines lunch counter. But Edna Griffin responded by organizing pickets in front of the store — and when no one else joined her, she would picket alone. She took her case all the way to the Iowa Supreme Court — and she won.

Way to confuse civil rights with womens’ suffering. Typical of Democrats to ennoble their sordid struggle by fraudulent misrepresentation.

Other women have had the benefit of networks of women drawn together by shared experiences and aspirations. I’ve had the privilege of traveling to more than 80 countries. And everywhere I’ve been as First Lady and now as Senator, I have tried to find time to meet with women in the countries where I find myself- to ask them what their lives are like, what kind of opportunities and challenges they face. I remember a woman in Northern Ireland by the name of Joyce McCartan. Joyce, a Catholic, had lost more than a dozen family members during the so called “troubles” — including her own seventeen-year old son who was shot dead by Protestant gunmen. But instead of retreating into anger and grief and wanting revenge, she brought together a group of both Protestant and Catholic women to set up a safe house for women of both traditions to talk about their needs and their fears over cups of tea.

That is heroic. It also involves religion, and staying at home. Learn the right lesson here, Hillary!

I sat down with those women one day and I listened as they talked about how they had discovered that they all worried when their husbands and sons left their homes, and they were all relieved when they returned safely. And despite their differences, they wanted a better future for their country and their children. It was these women — and others like them — sitting around at kitchen tables, sharing pots of tea, who helped chart the path to peace.

Amen! (Do you know what that word means, Hillary?)

Here at home, during my time in the Senate, I have cherished the opportunity to work with my women colleagues in both Houses and on both sides of the aisle. Now we may not see eye to eye on everything, but we get together and we trade those very important bits of advice like what kind of shoes to wear on marble floors when you’re on your feet all day. And when it comes to the issues that we can agree on — whether it’s afterschool funding or healthcare and education for women here in America or for women in Afghanistan– we are a force to be reckoned with.

Shopping for shoesThe truth finally bubbles out: Women are far too busy shopping for shoes to focus on decent governance.

I’ve been honored to work throughout my career on issues like foster care and adoption, family leave, equal pay and preschool for our children. And I have always been struck when people label these as women’s issues. I disagree with that characterization. While these so-called “kitchen table” issues are certainly women’s issues — they’re also men’s issues and children’s issues. They’re issues that we all have a stake in.

Don’t muddy the waters. They’re womens’ issues, just like the economy and the military are mens’ issues. Ultimately, men should vote on womens’ issues, but decent men should heed their wives’ advice on the best stance for a Christian to take on the womens’ issues. Or, at the very least, take such advice into consideration. No loving husband could do less.

Today, too many men have to choose between health insurance for themselves or for their children, because they can’t afford both.

If they spent more time praying and housekeeping and less time stealing their husbands’ jobs, this might not be such a problem.

When women make just 77 cents for every dollar a man earns — it’s not just women who are affected, but families with less income to pay the bills.

See above.

We’re all worried about whether the next generation of children will have the tools they need to compete in the global economy.

Today, many fathers are struggling to spend more time with their families just like mothers always have. In fact, the issue of family leave provides a particularly good example. I’ll never forget a newspaper advice column that I read in the early 1980s. I was working at a law firm at the time and my daughter was about three years old. Someone had written into this column asking: “I’m about to get a big promotion and I’m going to have my own office for the first time. What kind of decorations are appropriate for my office?”

Well, the advice columnist responded that he needed to know if the writer was a man or a woman because it would affect the answer. If you’re a man, he said, and you have a family, put up lots of pictures of your family because people will think when they come into your office “this is a stable person with a good set of family values.” But if you’re a woman, don’t put any pictures of your family in your office because people will think you can’t keep your mind on your job.

If you’re a woman, let your husband have your job, and go home to be with your family. That’d be my advice, Hillary.

So, of course, I immediately filled my office with pictures of my family.

Of course you would. Degenerate atheist.

Well, a lot has changed since then. But unfortunately this attitude is still around. It kind of sums up too many people’s feelings towards women and parents in the workplace: Keep your family life to yourself, struggle on your own to meet the demands of work and family and don’t let it affect your work.

But think about this for a minute. A lot of working fathers wish they had more time with their children. All employers want employees to be focused and productive — which is hard to achieve when work and family are out of balance. And every American has a stake in how the next generation is raised — after all, we’re raising our future innovators, our college professors, our nurses, our business leaders, our farmers, teachers and so much more.

Blah blah blah, banter banter banter, gobbledygook platitudes, Hillary is struggling under the weight of her own lies and distortions.

So when we fight to strengthen family leave — that helps not just women, but all Americans who want to spend more time with the people they love and care for. That’s why I’m fighting for paid family leave — because no one should have to worry if they need a couple of hours to take their child to the doctor. And no one should be denied the chance to bond with their newborn or adopted baby or to care for an aging parent. I think we should encourage the development of families working to take care of one another. There’s so much care giving that goes on in our country, we sometimes overlook it. But if all the caregivers, people who devote most or all of their time caring for a child, caring for a parent, caring for a loved one with a disability, if all of those Americans were to decide tomorrow to stop giving that out of love, to replace that care would cost 300 billion dollars a year. People give it because they love, they have a sense of family obligation, they want to do the right thing and we make it very, very hard for families to care for one another.

Sleeping CheneyBoring! I almost fell asleep halfway through this, then skipped to the end. I bet the audience was really snoring at this point.

Instead of focusing on what is really going on in people’s lives, too often our politics is about distractions. Who’s up, who’s down. What people are wearing more than what they are saying.

Well, there will always be that kind of analysis. But in the end, none of that really matters very much.

Exactly. Which is why we can’t have women running for office. They focus far too much on fashion, and not enough on the issues. It’s as simple as that, folks.

What matters are the lives of people I meet every day who feel like they’re invisible. Like no one’s paying attention to them and their struggles.

Good!

Like the woman I met from LeClair who had to sell half her family farm to pay for her family’s medical bills. She sure feels invisible.

Maybe she is. Maybe you made her up. Who knows? Who cares?

Or the woman I met at the Maid-Rite in Toledo who was working two jobs and still struggling to get by and she wonders whether anybody really sees how hard she’s been working.

I’m sure you were shopping there, right?

The woman in Greenville whose daughter got sick, but didn’t have health insurance. She died a year later. She was just eighteen years old. Her death certificate listed the cause of death as unknown, because she was never able to afford to get a proper diagnosis.

When God calls, you come.

Well, I don’t think that any of these people should be invisible in our country. They’re certainly not invisible to me. I see them, I hear them, and I carry their stories with me where ever I go. And they shouldn’t be invisible in our political process.

Breaking news: Hillary is insane.

One of the aspects of politics that has changed dramatically with the entry of some many women is that a lot of these stories are now just out there, people are talking about them, trying to determine what to do to give someone who is struggling a better chance. When I think about the struggle that women had to even get the vote I don’t get discouraged, I get inspired.

And decent Americans get traumatized. That’s the difference between Red America and Blue anti-America, in a nutshell.

The first women’s convention was held in Seneca Falls, New York in 1848. It was a hot July and a group of women decided that they wanted to meet together at the Wesleyan Chapel in Seneca Falls to see if they could draft a statement claiming their rights as women. At that time of course our laws didn’t really give women rights in any aspect of life, not just at the voting booth but in inheritance and marriage and child custody and so much else. So these women and a few brave men joined together on that hot July day to begin a process that led to the Declaration of Sentiments. It was the first document that we know of anywhere in the world where a group of people had come and said women deserve their rights. Only one woman who was there are that convention lived long enough to see women get the vote in America. It took more than 70 years from the start of the movement until nineteenth amendment was passed. More than 70 years of faith and devotion, protesting and lobbying. And when I think about the challenges we face today in politics, I always am in awe of how hard these other women had to struggle to get what we take for granted.

Ultimately, they did succeed, because even in the face of the most heartbreaking set-backs, they never lost sight of what mattered and they refused to give up.

I’ve always loved the story of how, back in 1915, Catt and her colleagues believed that winning in New York was critical to winning at the federal level, so they fought their hearts out. They held 10,300 meetings. They handed out seven and a half million leaflets. And they raised nearly $100,000 — a staggering sum in those days.

But in the end, they lost by nearly 200,000 votes.

That night, Catt was asked how long this defeat would delay their fight nationally. She replied, “Only until we can get a little sleep.” And two days after that loss, they started a new campaign with a new slogan: “Victory in 1917.”

I’m grateful to her and countless others because I know that every day I walk in the paths they cleared and benefit from the victories they won.

YawnZzzzzzz…. …. whu? …Zzzzzzz……..

Now, some might say that their work is finished in America since women no longer face legal obstacles to education or employment or the right to vote. But we know that even though legal barriers have fallen away — economic and attitudinal ones still remain. And that so long as there are gaps between our aspirations and our reality, their work and ours is not finished. That more perfect union still awaits.

We Americans must do everything in our power to strengthen, thicken, and raise those barriers. It’s our duty to our God, our country, and our selves.

If we truly want to finish what Catt and her colleagues had started, then it is time we stopped paying women 77 cents on the dollar when they work 60 minutes of the hour, just like men.

[Applause]

Women aren’t men. Why should they be paid like men? You’re insane, Hillary. You want to treat genders like they’re the same, just like you want Sodomites to wed. If you become President, I’ll probably have to divorce my loving wife and marry one of my coworkers. (They’re all men, by the way. It’s a man’s world out there. Don’t like it? Complain to HE who made it.)

We can see that we are still not where we need to be because just this year the United States Supreme Court heard a case of a woman named Lilly Ledbetter. Lilly Ledbetter worked in a factory in Alabama. She worked there for over 20 years. She was a good worker. She became a supervisor- the only woman to become a supervisor and year after year she did the same work that all of the male supervisors did. And about 20 years into her work she learned she had never been paid the same as all of the men. Men with lesser seniority, younger men, and she wondered why. And she tried to find out and basically her employer wouldn’t answer her questions. And Lilly Ledbetter didn’t want to take that for an answer. So she started talking to people in town and somebody sent her to a lawyer and the lawyer said that’s against the Equal Pay Act, we’ve had an Equal Pay Act on the books since 1963- they can’t do that. The lawyer called the factory and the factory wouldn’t talk to the lawyer so the lawyer brought a law suit. And Lilly Ledbetter won in court and the factory appealed it. And she won in the appellate court and the factory appealed it to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court has changed in composition as you know and all of a sudden after everyone thought that the cases had been settled, that if you were discriminated for doing the same job as a woman that a man is doing you are entitled to back pay for as long as you have been doing that job as a way to deter other employers from practicing discrimination and to make good on the many hours of work that were not fairly compensated. Well, the new Supreme Court found a reason to deny Lilly Ledbetter back pay for all of those years. They came up with a theory that nobody had ever heard of before. So don’t believe that the hard work is over- we still have a long way to go.

If we truly want to finish what Catt and her colleagues started, then it’s time we did more than just talking about family values — we need to adopt policies that truly value families.

[Applause]

YawnShut up! God, when does this nonsense end? Hillary talks for days on end! Shut up!

We stand for universal pre-kindergarten all the way through to affordable college.

[Applause]

From quality, affordable healthcare for every American to retirement security for every American. Paid leave. Flexible workplaces.

We need to recognize the challenges that so many people face today. You know, the economy is much more difficult. The average American family has lost a thousand dollars in income in the last six years but the costs of everything else have gone up- health care, education, energy and gas. It’s much tougher for young families to really pull together the time they need for each other.

The biggest concern that a lot of young families tell me is that they don’t have enough time. They’re working as hard as they can, they’re worried about their future, they’re anxious about everything from whether they have enough to put away to tide them over on a rainy day to what happens in the mortgage market and what’s going on if somebody in their family gets sick.

If we truly want to finish what Catt and her colleagues started, then we need to do something about our national debt — $9 trillion and counting.

That’s enough of this nonsense. It just goes on like this, for ever and ever and ever.

Anyone who thinks someone who talks like this belongs in the White House as anything other than a maid or an ornament needs to have their heads examined. God, what a crazy dullard! Only in Moonbattia could such a character avoid living under a bridge or hoarding cats or something.

No Woman SuffrageWe need to repeal womens’ suffrage posthaste. The work has already begun, but undoing the damage done in the last 90 years will be a long, hard slog. Fortunately, we have God on our side, and with the love of God in our hearts and the Fate of America in our hands, we know we shall prevail.

God bless America, and God bless each and every one of His servants!

81 Comments »

  1. in b4 feminist s***storm

    Comment by Elephant Bones — February 18, 2008 @ 2:21 pm | Reply

  2. What does that mean, EB?

    Comment by Sisyphus — February 18, 2008 @ 2:35 pm | Reply

  3. You sir are a idiotic fundamentalist. I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it….but only half-heartedly.

    Comment by motherfarker — February 18, 2008 @ 3:13 pm | Reply

  4. “You sir are a idiotic fundamentalist. I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it….but only half-heartedly.”

    Are you in the military? If so, I salute your sacrifice. I think we should proselytize to you people first and foremost. You save our country. Saving your souls is the very least we can do in return.

    Comment by Sisyphus — February 18, 2008 @ 3:19 pm | Reply

  5. “I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it….but only half-heartedly.”

    We do not approve of Frenchified perverts here, especially not Voltaire.

    Sisyphus, a beautiful post. We can, each and every one of us, work harder to make sure that women know their places. Feminists are almost always Marxists, and the bigger government is, the more popular Marxism becomes. We must work to push private enterprise into as many areas of our lives as possible, with little to no government interference. We could even technically allow women to get jobs, because without their affirmitative action programs or nanny state government hovering over them, only a few will get in. These few, being different, will quickly flee, since they shall be shunned. We must hammer the Leviticus codes of law into every single government building at least 21 times. Women are bad for the economy. If something is good for the economy, it’s good for the country. Period. Otherwise, you must be Russian. Russians measure things with rocks, so we should throw rocks them.

    Comment by bobcorker — February 18, 2008 @ 3:32 pm | Reply

  6. Well at least I am not a communist. You claim that I am the Marxist, do you really understand that what you are proposing is a common practice in North Korea and China, both communist countries. When we take the right of all the population to vote we lose the softer side of our country. I feel sorry for you boys, who think that women shouldn’t be allowed the freedoms that ALL humans should be entitled to. That is what our forefathers were trying to accomplish and it is people like you who strive to undo it.

    Comment by motherfarker — February 18, 2008 @ 3:43 pm | Reply

  7. tl;dr

    Comment by Tinlion — February 18, 2008 @ 3:55 pm | Reply

  8. “Sisyphus, a beautiful post.”

    Thank you, Bob. I like your ideas, BTW. We should bring back stoning in this country. Stoning a few particularly deviant women for behaving like men would make the rest of them return to their Christian duties quickly enough.

    “When we take the right of all the population to vote we lose the softer side of our country. I feel sorry for you boys, who think that women shouldn’t be allowed the freedoms that ALL humans should be entitled to. That is what our forefathers were trying to accomplish and it is people like you who strive to undo it.”

    If the Founders had been dumb enough to want women to vote, they would’ve put it in the Constitution. Instead, Susan B. Anthony had to seduce Woodrow Wilson into writing it in there, 150-some-odd years later.

    Comment by Sisyphus — February 18, 2008 @ 3:56 pm | Reply

  9. “tl;dr”

    What does this mean?

    Comment by Sisyphus — February 18, 2008 @ 3:57 pm | Reply

  10. too long; didn’t read

    Comment by Tinlion — February 18, 2008 @ 3:59 pm | Reply

  11. Whats really funn is me and a coworker were discussing your site and thought that the next thing you would talk about is stoning… what a coincidence.

    Comment by motherfarker — February 18, 2008 @ 4:00 pm | Reply

  12. “We should bring back stoning in this country. Stoning a few particularly deviant women for behaving like men would make the rest of them return to their Christian duties quickly enough.”

    We certainly should, Sisyphus. Starting with everything the Bible says, I think that some interesting laws are found here. Although the website seems to be a deist populist haven, they happen to come up with some very, very attractive ideas. I quite like, for instance, the menstrual police.

    Comment by bobcorker — February 18, 2008 @ 4:13 pm | Reply

  13. I am glad that you are in a religion’s that values non-violent and yet condones the act of stoning women. If you would have your way I can almost guarantee that the country would be run like Iran under Sharia law.

    Comment by Kat — February 18, 2008 @ 4:14 pm | Reply

  14. I liked how Hillary tried to use that Supreme Court ruling to act like the judicial branch is out to get women which just isn’t true. Notice she didn’t actually mention specific ruling at all and just mentioned the barest background. Is She actually implying that the highest court in the land would be swayed by simple sexism? Who the heck does she think she is? The actual court ruling dealt with a time limit to bring up civil court cases. Its the same reason if you got into a car accident 20 years ago, the other person can’t just decide to sue you now. For a woman that loves to use her background as a lawyer to sell as presidential experience, she sure is willing to tarnish the image of our highest legal institutions for political gain. Is nothing sacred to this woman?

    Comment by Diablo — February 18, 2008 @ 4:28 pm | Reply

  15. “too long; didn’t read”

    Then why comment?

    Whats really funn is me and a coworker were discussing your site and thought that the next thing you would talk about is stoning… what a coincidence.”

    I don’t see anything wrong with judicially-sanctioned stoning. As long as it’s done in accordance with Biblical law, what’s the problem? Granted, some modern laws may have to be done away with to allow for it; but there’s nothing wrong with stoning as a policy objective.

    “I quite like, for instance, the menstrual police.”

    The harlotry begins when the time of uncleanness ends.

    “For a woman that loves to use her background as a lawyer to sell as presidential experience, she sure is willing to tarnish the image of our highest legal institutions for political gain. Is nothing sacred to this woman?”

    No, Diablo, nothing. Not even her gender, apparently. Hillary truly knows no shame.

    Comment by Sisyphus — February 18, 2008 @ 4:36 pm | Reply

  16. “I am glad that you are in a religion’s that values non-violent and yet condones the act of stoning women. If you would have your way I can almost guarantee that the country would be run like Iran under Sharia law.”

    I should hope so. I hate Iran, and I hate Islam, but there’s nothing wrong with Iran’s methods of ensuring a moral nation. Frankly, I think America could learn a great deal by adopting a page or two of Iran’s public morality laws.

    Comment by Sisyphus — February 18, 2008 @ 4:41 pm | Reply

  17. I think it would be alright for women to vote as long their husbands are in the booth with them to make sure they vote as they were told to vote.

    Comment by Enola Tibbets — February 18, 2008 @ 4:59 pm | Reply

  18. Your language and how you use it reminds me of hitler. if that means this conversation is over and you win, america loses.

    Comment by motherfarker — February 18, 2008 @ 5:01 pm | Reply

  19. I hope your mother doesn’t find out that you think she should be beaten. Also, I should slap your mother for not aborting you. You should slap, her, too, since you hate women.

    I hope so. Because women have no place in politics, and the American people deserve to see that Truth and not have a female Fascist president shoved down their throats.

    Right, because Huckabee’s “YOU WILL FOLLOW ONLY THE BIBLE FOR IT WILL BE THE ONLY LAW” isn’t an example of fascism, right?

    Women were better off when they enjoyed the liberty of keeping a decent home, raising decent Americans, and not having to go out and toil in the world of men and harlots.

    So what about the mothers who are left alone to raise the children– either the father has ran out, or has been killed? They’re just supposed to raise the children, without money? Are you f*cking kidding me, you gigantic “doosh”?

    If we’d had a real President instead of Woodrow Wilson, she’d have been arrested and shot as a traitor.

    And yet again, Syphilis proves he hates God and Jesus, by advocating that we murder all women.

    Quite right. NASA is a hoax. The astronauts fly the shuttle into the desert, then spend the time in “space” gambling and patronizing brothels at taxpayer expense. Even those degenerate perverts and inveterate liars wouldn’t want Hillary Clinton tagging along. She’d spoil all their fornications.

    You never have any proof. Dumbass. I’ve personally been to JPL. Hell, I actually worked alongside them for a class project when I was a kid!

    Instead of focusing on what is really going on in people’s lives, too often our politics is about distractions. Who’s up, who’s down. What people are wearing more than what they are saying.

    Well, there will always be that kind of analysis. But in the end, none of that really matters very much.”

    Exactly. Which is why we can’t have women running for office. They focus far too much on fashion, and not enough on the issues. It’s as simple as that, folks.

    Learn to read, idiot.

    Half those names sound like mens’ names, and the other half sound made up. “Aung San Suu Kyi”? Gesundheit!

    I’ve never met a male Michelle or Ellen.

    Oh, and F*CK YOU, YOU RACIST FAGGOT.

    If you become President, I’ll probably have to divorce my loving wife and marry one of my coworkers. (They’re all men, by the way. It’s a man’s world out there. Don’t like it? Complain to HE who made it.)

    You would do it regardless. It’s official: Syphilis is a closet homosexual.

    Oh wait, you don’t have a wife. If you did, she’s not alive because you beat her on a daily basis.

    Hey, wonder what Mrs. T.D. Gaines-Crockett thinks of your idea that women should be uneducated slaves.

    Comment by Dio Brando — February 18, 2008 @ 5:29 pm | Reply

  20. I WILL HELP YOU KILL YOUR MOTHER. You will be happy because your mother is dead. You want all women dead, right? I agree with you, honorable brother Sisyphus. These women think they have the right to breathe the same air as us, just because they gave birth to us? HA! God cursed us they day he gave us women, and made us born from them. Hilary is a facist, and needs to be killed.

    I have a Mateba autorevolver in my shack– I will gladly find her next rally, drive to it, and put it in that wench’s skull. Women who read this, hear me out(if you’re not too stupid)– we WILL take back this world. How dare you try and act like us. We have the penis, not you. You are lesser. That’s why you don’t have one.

    Comment by Misogyny — February 18, 2008 @ 5:37 pm | Reply

  21. Actually, i did read the first paragraph or two, but I downgraded to skimming it, and after a few of your personal attacks against women, Hillary Clinton, a free America, etc., I stopped reading in disgust. As I always do for your posts, Sisyphus.

    @ Dio Brando: I agree; what does Mrs. Crockett think of this?

    Comment by Tinlion — February 18, 2008 @ 6:15 pm | Reply

  22. Hillary Clinton is the most vile woman who ever lived. I don’t think most women deserve the right to vote. Take it away from them. If that means I lose mine, so be it.

    As for stoning, Ralph and I feel very strongly about that issue. We both feel that teenagers who don’t obey their parents should die. Stoning seems like the best way to do it. It’s the way God tells us to kill them in the Bible.

    Comment by Marcia P. — February 18, 2008 @ 6:30 pm | Reply

  23. Exactly, Marcia. As Gary North once said, stones are cheap and plentiful, just like sinners. Their method of execution need not be elaborate.

    Comment by bobcorker — February 18, 2008 @ 6:44 pm | Reply

  24. “The harlotry begins when the time of uncleanness ends.”

    I think I’m missing the point here. I’m assuming that menstruating women are strumpets, seeking to spill their uncleanness on other men. On the other hand, God gave women periods to keep them in their places. Perhaps ending these period respites could be all that’s necessary to stop women’s suffrage?

    Comment by bobcorker — February 18, 2008 @ 6:47 pm | Reply

  25. We both feel that teenagers who don’t obey their parents should die.

    So if your parents told you to go kill yourself, you should do it?

    Comment by Dio Brando — February 18, 2008 @ 6:59 pm | Reply

  26. Perhaps my unaired comment was misread. I will repost it, to strike back against these heathen idiots who think women should be allowed to do more than cook us food, iron our shirts, and lay down and spread so that we can father more Christian soldiers.

    I agree with you, honorable brother Sisyphus. These women think they have the right to breathe the same air as us, just because they gave birth to us? HA! God cursed us they day he gave us women, and made us born from them. Hilary is a facist, and needs to be killed.

    I have a Mateba autorevolver in my shack– I will gladly find her next rally, drive to it, and put it in that wench’s skull if I must. Women who read this, hear me out(if you’re not too stupid)– we WILL take back this world. How dare you try and act like us. We have the penis, not you. You are lesser. That’s why you don’t have one.

    Comment by Misogyny — February 18, 2008 @ 7:02 pm | Reply

  27. God made me the way I am, whether you like it or not. For you to decide where I belong would be going against God. He puts me where he wants me.

    And God hasn’t killed us all so I’m guessing he isn’t all that upset.

    In fact, it is God who created these women rights supporters.

    Sounds to me like you hate God.

    Comment by Tokio — February 18, 2008 @ 7:19 pm | Reply

  28. “In fact, it is God who created these women rights supporters.

    Sounds to me like you hate God.”

    This isn’t “Gardening With Maurice”. We don’t use circular logic here.

    Comment by bobcorker — February 18, 2008 @ 7:44 pm | Reply

  29. This isn’t “Gardening With Maurice”. We don’t use circular logic here.

    You mean you don’t use logic, period. Logic scares your primitive, sheep-like mind. Question the bible? Accept women as a balance? Learn…to…ruh-ruh-read? HOW SCARY!

    Comment by Dio Brando — February 18, 2008 @ 8:26 pm | Reply

  30. “You mean you don’t use logic, period. Logic scares your primitive, sheep-like mind. Question the bible? Accept women as a balance? Learn…to…ruh-ruh-read? HOW SCARY!”

    I understand that it is possible to confuse Brownback supporters with Mike Tyson, but please, try harder to read the post.

    According to her, if God created women rights supporters, God also created anti-suffragates. The reality, however, is that Satan created feminists, probably after he turned the dinosaurs gay.

    Comment by bobcorker — February 18, 2008 @ 8:33 pm | Reply

  31. Hey Bob, I found a website that’s perfect for you.

    “The reality, however, is that Satan created feminists, probably after he turned the dinosaurs gay.”
    Evidence. “Because I said so” doesn’t work outside the realm of religious stupidity.

    Comment by Elephant Bones — February 18, 2008 @ 8:42 pm | Reply

  32. “probably after he turned the dinosaurs gay.”

    …what?!

    Comment by Tinlion — February 18, 2008 @ 8:54 pm | Reply

  33. EB, why does that site seem like a parody? It’s pretty f’ing stupid. We don’t hate women; they just need to know their Biblical places and stop dressing like sluts all the time.

    God, through His mercy, sent the flood to kill the dinosaurs because Satan turned them gay. The gay dinosaurs raped and killed humans, and basically made Jesus cry. (credit: BJ Tabor)

    Comment by bobcorker — February 18, 2008 @ 8:59 pm | Reply

  34. “God, through His mercy, sent the flood to kill the dinosaurs because Satan turned them gay. The gay dinosaurs raped and killed humans, and basically made Jesus cry.”

    What?!?

    That’s so stupid I think I just lost some IQ!

    Comment by Tinlion — February 18, 2008 @ 9:02 pm | Reply

  35. “What?!?

    That’s so stupid I think I just lost some IQ!”

    What’s YOUR theory of dinosaurs then, Helioleftist?

    The rules:

    1. Must be in a 6000 year earth.
    2. Must exclude ALL other ideas.
    3. Must not be refuted by the Bible.
    4. Sisyphus, Psycheout, and I must like it. If we don’t like it, it’s not true. End of discussion.

    Comment by bobcorker — February 18, 2008 @ 9:14 pm | Reply

  36. The way you word it (especially rule 4) makes it impossible for me to win, wingnut.

    Comment by Tinlion — February 18, 2008 @ 9:30 pm | Reply

  37. Also, just because you don’t like it doesn’t mean it’s not true.

    You aren’t God, remember?

    Comment by Tinlion — February 18, 2008 @ 9:52 pm | Reply

  38. When it comes down to it men and women are both human and thus equal. If all the men were to disappear then humankind would die off. If all women were to disappear then humankind would die off.

    One gender is not more important than the other, it’s a 50/50 deal.

    And I could really care less what some human tainted book says. Even if it is true, God doesn’t seem to mind female equality because he hasn’t killed us all.

    And he had to have seen it coming anyway if he’s omnipotent.

    Anyway, this blog must be a satire because I don’t want to believe anyone is really this sexist.

    Comment by Tokio — February 18, 2008 @ 10:25 pm | Reply

  39. The way you word it (especially rule 4) makes it impossible for me to win, wingnut.

    Now you’re getting the idea. Rule 4, leftards. Rule 4.

    Comment by Psycheout — February 18, 2008 @ 10:35 pm | Reply

  40. “Sisyphus, Psycheout, and I must like it. If we don’t like it, it’s not true. End of discussion.”
    Sounds like we got some existentialists.

    Comment by Elephant Bones — February 18, 2008 @ 10:59 pm | Reply

  41. “Now you’re getting the idea. Rule 4, leftards. Rule 4.”

    Because everything you think is true, is. /sarcasm

    That makes you a god, and therefore a false idol.

    Comment by Tinlion — February 19, 2008 @ 12:16 am | Reply

  42. I understand that it is possible to confuse Brownback supporters with Mike Tyson, but please, try harder to read the post.

    According to her, if God created women rights supporters, God also created anti-suffragates. The reality, however, is that Satan created feminists, probably after he turned the dinosaurs gay.

    Funny, the only difference between you and Mike Tyson(besides his money and titles) is that he’s black.

    The rules:

    1. Must be in a 6000 year earth.
    2. Must exclude ALL other ideas.
    3. Must not be refuted by the Bible.
    4. Sisyphus, Psycheout, and I must like it. If we don’t like it, it’s not true. End of discussion.

    1.) Earth is more than 6000 years old. For f*ck’s sake, human CULTURE is over 6000 years old.

    2.) NO ONE CAN THINK DIFFERENT ONLY VIEW WORLD IN SAME WAY NEVERMIND 10 DIFFERENT TRANSLATIONS OF THE BIBLE AND 393674364538464 VERSIONS OF CHRISTIANITY.

    3.) The Bible refutes the Bible. It contradicts itself.

    4.) You guys hate everything that isn’t white, male, and christian. You guys, for homo bashers, sure are pretty homosexual.

    Comment by Dio Brando — February 19, 2008 @ 12:46 am | Reply

  43. We both feel that teenagers who don’t obey their parents should die.

    Sounds like someone listened to you, Marchit P.

    Comment by Dio Brando — February 19, 2008 @ 4:48 am | Reply

  44. “I think it would be alright for women to vote as long their husbands are in the booth with them to make sure they vote as they were told to vote.”

    Maybe, but the moonbat deviants among us might take the opportunity to feign marriage and begin fornication. America can’t allow that to happen.

    “Your language and how you use it reminds me of hitler. if that means this conversation is over and you win, america loses.”

    Whatever. Hitler had women fighting for him. He was a deviant, and a leftist like you.

    “I hope your mother doesn’t find out that you think she should be beaten. Also, I should slap your mother for not aborting you. You should slap, her, too, since you hate women.”

    I love my mother. I love all God-fearing women. It’s the harlots and Communists who need corrective measures.

    “You would do it regardless. It’s official: Syphilis is a closet homosexual.”

    No I’m not.

    “Oh wait, you don’t have a wife. If you did, she’s not alive because you beat her on a daily basis.”

    No I don’t, and those are libelous comments.

    “Hillary Clinton is the most vile woman who ever lived. I don’t think most women deserve the right to vote. Take it away from them. If that means I lose mine, so be it.

    “As for stoning, Ralph and I feel very strongly about that issue. We both feel that teenagers who don’t obey their parents should die. Stoning seems like the best way to do it. It’s the way God tells us to kill them in the Bible.”

    Amen!
    “I think I’m missing the point here. I’m assuming that menstruating women are strumpets, seeking to spill their uncleanness on other men. On the other hand, God gave women periods to keep them in their places. Perhaps ending these period respites could be all that’s necessary to stop women’s suffrage?”

    I don’t know how we could do that, though. Women must suffer once a month. They atone for the sins they’ve inherited from Eve.

    “According to her, if God created women rights supporters, God also created anti-suffragates. The reality, however, is that Satan created feminists, probably after he turned the dinosaurs gay.”

    Dinosaurs and dragons were always creatures of Darkness. Thank God Noah didn’t put them on the Ark. Their homosexuality does not surprise me.

    “When it comes down to it men and women are both human and thus equal. If all the men were to disappear then humankind would die off. If all women were to disappear then humankind would die off.”

    We have different roles to play. It is man’s role to rule, and woman’s role to serve. There is an order, set by God. If God has chosen men to be more important, who are we to fight His will?

    “You aren’t God, remember?”

    True enough, but God speaks to all who listen and obey.

    “And I could really care less what some human tainted book says. Even if it is true, God doesn’t seem to mind female equality because he hasn’t killed us all.”

    Your time will come.

    “Anyway, this blog must be a satire because I don’t want to believe anyone is really this sexist.”

    Sorry, treefrog. We’re not a satire.

    Comment by Sisyphus — February 19, 2008 @ 9:20 am | Reply

  45. “We’re not a satire.”

    By Sixsixsixiphus

    nah, you are CHEAP satire (yeah SHEEP SATIRE)

    Comment by Y6799 — February 19, 2008 @ 1:29 pm | Reply

  46. No I don’t, and those are libelous comments.

    I’m only using the same logic as you. “If I don’t like it, it must be the most evil sinful thing out there and I must murder it. Like everyone who isn’t Christian.”

    Dinosaurs and dragons were always creatures of Darkness. Thank God Noah didn’t put them on the Ark. Their homosexuality does not surprise me.

    Dragons aren’t real, idiot. And dinosaurs predate Noah by MILLIONS of years.

    Feel free to dispute the fact that we’ve been alive for over 13,000 years with solid, SOLID scientific evidence.

    Comment by Dio Brando — February 19, 2008 @ 1:34 pm | Reply

  47. “I’m only using the same logic as you. “If I don’t like it, it must be the most evil sinful thing out there and I must murder it. Like everyone who isn’t Christian.”

    My comments are based on Scripture and revelation, unlike your dissemblings and slanders.

    “Dragons aren’t real, idiot. And dinosaurs predate Noah by MILLIONS of years.”

    Impossible. Earth has only existed for 6000 years. Dragons were real, but their bones were destroyed by the explosive fires and corrosive acids they carried within their bellies. Breathing flames leads to destructive decomposition.

    Comment by Sisyphus — February 19, 2008 @ 2:16 pm | Reply

  48. “nah, you are CHEAP satire (yeah SHEEP SATIRE)”

    No I’m not.

    Comment by Sisyphus — February 19, 2008 @ 2:29 pm | Reply

  49. “Sounds like someone listened to you, Marchit P.”

    The guy was mentally insane, and the exact reason for burning, other than that, is not specified. Nowhere is Scripture mentioned. Besides, she shouldn’t have been talking on the internet to some pervert anyways. If he felt that she was posessd by demons, he MUST exorcise them out of her.

    “Feel free to dispute the fact that we’ve been alive for over 13,000 years with solid, SOLID scientific evidence.”

    Where’s the missing link between chimps and humans then, genius?

    I like how Tinlion doesn’t even try to offer some theory of dinosaurs herself. Typical female: always relying on the menfolk to argue. Rule 4 applies HERE, at least. If you don’t love it, you can always leave. No one is forcing you to come here, and we’d rather not see your goosestepping Helioleftist face around here, anyways.

    “I don’t know how we could do that, though. Women must suffer once a month. They atone for the sins they’ve inherited from Eve.”

    We dare not attempt, either. Perhaps we should attempt to cause women to menustrate more, at least until we can return to the Golden Age?

    “Impossible. Earth has only existed for 6000 years. Dragons were real, but their bones were destroyed by the explosive fires and corrosive acids they carried within their bellies. Breathing flames leads to destructive decomposition.”

    They also died from chewing on underground tree roots and listening to talking squirrels. Nidhogg was one dragon that suffered this way. Also, the knights that slayed them were guided by angels. Angels make everything they hate disappear.

    Comment by bobcorker — February 19, 2008 @ 3:00 pm | Reply

  50. “The guy was mentally insane, and the exact reason for burning, other than that, is not specified. Nowhere is Scripture mentioned. Besides, she shouldn’t have been talking on the internet to some pervert anyways. If he felt that she was posessd by demons, he MUST exorcise them out of her.”

    Exactly!

    “We dare not attempt, either. Perhaps we should attempt to cause women to menustrate more, at least until we can return to the Golden Age?”

    Perhaps. If God so wills it, He will let us know. I await His sign. If He wills it, He will show us how to do it.

    “They also died from chewing on underground tree roots and listening to talking squirrels. Nidhogg was one dragon that suffered this way. Also, the knights that slayed them were guided by angels. Angels make everything they hate disappear.”

    I didn’t know about the squirrels. I thought they may have trusted the giants too much in their counsels. Nimrod was not the kind of giant one could trust with one’s back turned. Even a dragon would likely find him a treacherous friend and a deadly foe.

    Comment by Sisyphus — February 19, 2008 @ 3:15 pm | Reply

  51. My comments are based on Scripture and revelation, unlike your dissemblings and slanders.

    Show me again where the Bible says “Kill every jew, every non-white, every woman, every child that belongs to someone who does not believe the same as you. Never accept peace. A good Christian is he who murders daily.”?

    The guy was mentally insane, and the exact reason for burning, other than that, is not specified. Nowhere is Scripture mentioned. Besides, she shouldn’t have been talking on the internet to some pervert anyways. If he felt that she was posessd by demons, he MUST exorcise them out of her.

    She was simply talking to a boy. May have simply been a friend, or a schoolmate.

    But since she disobeyed him, he killed her. That’s what you and Marchit want, right?

    Impossible. Earth has only existed for 6000 years. Dragons were real, but their bones were destroyed by the explosive fires and corrosive acids they carried within their bellies. Breathing flames leads to destructive decomposition.

    Bible never mentions 6000 years. Reproducible evidence shows that the planet has existed for a few million years, at the very least. Light-speed and physics calculations back up the claim that the universe has existed for far longer. Oh, and don’t forget human culture dating back to thousands of years ago, including numerous cultures existing prior to Zarathustra’s formation of monotheism(the true origin of later religions of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam).

    If the planet’s only been alive for 6000 years, how come we have established cultures and religions that predate anything mentioned in the Bible?

    Dragons don’t exist. There is no evidence to support them. The only bit is that they exist in other religions, but studies have shown that– guess what? Volcanoes. In these regions where dragons were believed, are volcanoes, very active ones.

    Where’s the missing link between chimps and humans then, genius?
    We’ve known for some time.

    Basically, as evolution works, a group split off from another, split off into more groups(you can see this pattern in birds, doubly so if you know that dinosaurs are essentially the predecessors of birds– provable with mere anatomy alone!), and each of those continued to evolve, some dying out(environmental changes, competition from other animals), other even being hunted down and killed(Neanderthals may have been killed by our own ancestors).

    Here’s a question: Why does the Bible offer up numerous versions of how the Red Sea event happened?

    Why the following contradictions:

    Love is not jealous or boastful (1 Corinthians 13:4)

    …God is Love(1 John 4:16) I the Lord your God am a jealous God … for the Lord, Whose name is Jealous, is a jealous God (Exodus 34:14 and 20:5)

    And now, O Father, glorify Thou Me with the own self glory I had with Thee before the world was (John 17:5)

    I am Yahweh, that is my name- and my glory to another will I not give (Isaiah 42:8 )

    The man and his wife [Adam and Eve] heard the sound of the Lord God walking about in the garden… The Lord God called to the man, “Where are you?” (Gen 3:8-9)

    But Jesus knew what they were thinking… he knew what was in their minds…For Yahweh is an all-knowing God…and Jesus knew what was going on in their minds. (Luke 5:22; 6:8; 9:47 and 1 Sam 2:3).

    Love your enemies and pray for your persecutors…There must be no limit to your goodness, as your heavenly Father’s goodness knows no bounds. (Matthew 5:44-48)

    Go now, fall upon the Amalekites, destroy them, and put their property under ban. Spare no one; put them all to death, men and women, children and babes in arms, herds and flocks, camels and donkeys… I [God] polluted them with their own offerings, making them sacrifice all their firstborn; which was to punish them, so that they would learn that I am Yahweh. (1 Samuel 15:3; Ezekiel 20:25-26)

    If a man looks at a woman with a lustful eye, he has already committed adultery with her in his heart. If your right eye causes your downfall, tear it out and flint it away; it is better for you to lose one part of your body than the whole of it to be thrown into hell. (Matthew 5:28-30)

    When you go to battle against your enemies and the Lord your God delivers them into your hands and you take some of them captive, then if you see a comely woman among the prisoners and are attracted to her, you may take her as your wife. Bring her into your house; there she must shave her head, pare her nails, and discard the clothes which she had when captured. For a full month she is to stay in your house mourning for her father and mother. After that you may have intercourse with her, and be man and wife. But if you no longer find her pleasing, let her go free. You must not sell her or treat her harshly, since you have had your will with her. (Deut 21:10 )

    Therefore Michal, the daughter of Saul, had no child unto the day of her death.(2 Samuel 6:23)

    The five sons of Michal, the daughter of Saul.(2 Samuel 21:8)

    Let no one say when he is tempted, “I am tempted by God”; for God cannot be tempted by evil, nor does He Himself tempt anyone.(James 1:13)

    Then God sent an evil spirit between Abimelech and the men of Shechem; and the men of Shechem dealt treacherously with Abimelech(Judges 9:23)

    Comment by Dio Brando — February 19, 2008 @ 3:54 pm | Reply

  52. They also died from chewing on underground tree roots and listening to talking squirrels. Nidhogg was one dragon that suffered this way. Also, the knights that slayed them were guided by angels. Angels make everything they hate disappear.

    Níðhöggr is NORSE MYTHOLOGY, idiot. Also, it’s a snake, not a dragon. Fafnir was a dragon, however. At most, Níðhöggr was similar to the Chinese-style.

    Also, they weren’t guided by angels, but instead by Valkyrie.

    But wait, mentioning Ratatosk AND Níðhöggr? Are you…actually learning something that isn’t in the Bible?

    Comment by Dio Brando — February 19, 2008 @ 4:05 pm | Reply

  53. tl;dr

    [Ed Note: dr;dc (didn’t read; don’t comment).]

    Comment by The Nobody — February 19, 2008 @ 6:00 pm | Reply

  54. […] Considering the vast hoards of mindless women supporting Obambi, Sisyphus is right: it’s time to reconsider and revoke womens’ suffrage. […]

    Pingback by Is Barack Obama a Closet Communist? « Blogs 4 Brownback — February 19, 2008 @ 6:33 pm | Reply

  55. [Ed Note: dr;dc (didn’t read; don’t comment).]

    yd;fu

    You’re dumb; ____ you.

    Comment by Dio Brando — February 19, 2008 @ 6:56 pm | Reply

  56. Sisy, Corker, Psyche, Diablo, MarciaPP, and all the rest of you. You are sick perverted bastards that all need to die. You are liars, murderers, instigaters of violence and torture and just basically the lowest form of scum on the planet. It’s time to say goodbye to this stupid site and get back to reading things that actually make sense. Just wanted to let you know first that you fool no one. We all know you are a parody and a troll site, and no one believes you including you. But even as a parody you are still the most ignorant and disgusting people on earth.
    I seriously hope you all die a painful and terrible death in the near future, and anything I can do to help bring that about I will do gladly, since nothing would give me more pleasure than to see the broken and bleeding bodies of each of you laid out before me so I can piss on each of you before you die.
    Have a nice life [meanies].

    Comment by Arn — February 19, 2008 @ 7:08 pm | Reply

  57. I seriously hope you all die a painful and terrible death in the near future, and anything I can do to help bring that about I will do gladly, since nothing would give me more pleasure than to see the broken and bleeding bodies of each of you laid out before me so I can piss on each of you before you die.

    Given enough time, the “tolerant” left always reveals its true nature. The honesty is refreshing, as this is what they really harbor inside their black little hearts. It rarely is exposed to the light of day, since leftists are so dishonest, even with themselves. But once in awhile the truth leaks out.

    Go smoke a jazz cigarette and “mellow out.” Your bitterness, anger and hatred is a result of your failed ideology. But it’s probably too late for you to realize the error of your ways. Too bad. Jesus is calling to you, but you refuse to listen.

    How do you live with your cognitive dissonance? Does it help to be schizophrenic?

    Comment by Psycheout — February 19, 2008 @ 7:20 pm | Reply

  58. How do you live with your cognitive dissonance? Does it help to be schizophrenic?

    Comment by Psycheout — February 19, 2008 @ 7:20

    Nope,,, but being quadrophrenic does.

    Comment by Arn — February 19, 2008 @ 7:23 pm | Reply

  59. Your bitterness, anger and hatred is a result of your failed ideology.

    Oh, the irony.

    Comment by Dio Brando — February 19, 2008 @ 7:29 pm | Reply

  60. irony can be pretty ironic at times, huh?

    Comment by Arn — February 19, 2008 @ 7:32 pm | Reply

  61. Arn, do you remember saying this on the longhair thread at B4C?

    “Arn Says:

    January 5, 2008 at 10:21 am
    And don’t get me wrong MoxoM, my opinion of Corker will probably always remain the same, but deep inside I can never wish any real harm on anyone, I’m just not programmed that way. Contrary to what Corker prefers to believe.”

    And here you say:

    “I seriously hope you all die a painful and terrible death in the near future, and anything I can do to help bring that about I will do gladly, since nothing would give me more pleasure than to see the broken and bleeding bodies of each of you laid out before me so I can piss on each of you before you die.”

    Psycheout was right: all you atheists just spend time being angry at the world. I’m angry at your kind, because you mock the LORD and quote Him out of context. The only reason blasphemy laws were abolished were because the labor unions infilitrated government. Well, we’ll kill you all, and make sure this never happens again. In this way, we can finally have some peace and integrity in the political scene.

    And no, you don’t really think we’re parodies. You don’t hate Stephen Colbert. You do, however, hate us. Anyways, good riddance. Enjoy your poverty, and try not spending so much time on the computer. And yes, pot is bad for you. Get over it.

    “But wait, mentioning Ratatosk AND Níðhöggr? Are you…actually learning something that isn’t in the Bible?”

    We will learn your religions inside out before annihilating them, just as the Christian humanists proposed we do.

    “Perhaps. If God so wills it, He will let us know. I await His sign. If He wills it, He will show us how to do it.”

    Whatever the case, menstruating women must not be allowed in public whatsoever.

    “I didn’t know about the squirrels. I thought they may have trusted the giants too much in their counsels. Nimrod was not the kind of giant one could trust with one’s back turned. Even a dragon would likely find him a treacherous friend and a deadly foe.”

    Satan/Loki’s Minions would not be able to acheive perfect harmony. That is why Satan can never overthrow the LORD, although he has come pretty close.

    “Dragons don’t exist. There is no evidence to support them. The only bit is that they exist in other religions, but studies have shown that– guess what? Volcanoes. In these regions where dragons were believed, are volcanoes, very active ones.”

    There’s no evidence to support atheism, but you think it’s true. Christianity, on the other hand, has had many people have positive psychological moments, and is the world’s #1 religion. And unlike atheism, Christianity is often adopted by free will. The amount of believers in America and possibly Britian is growing. And Africa/South America are always improving. Southern (not the country) Africa and S. America are welcome to be close allies with us if they can kick out their socialists.

    “Basically, as evolution works, a group split off from another, split off into more groups(you can see this pattern in birds, doubly so if you know that dinosaurs are essentially the predecessors of birds– provable with mere anatomy alone!), and each of those continued to evolve, some dying out(environmental changes, competition from other animals), other even being hunted down and killed(Neanderthals may have been killed by our own ancestors).”

    Microevolution is fact. Macroevolution, however, is myth. Genetic mutation and natural selection must happen instantly if any developmental advantages are to take place. If the animal is developing an ability too slowly, that will be wasted triphosphorous sugars.

    This alone does not prove a young earth, but the fact that the ‘Gap Theory’ and ‘Progressive Creationism’ arose as a reaction to Theistic Evolution (thinking that they got the Earth’s age right) is alone enough evidence to convince one that an old earth is contrary to Christianity.

    Comment by bobcorker — February 19, 2008 @ 8:25 pm | Reply

  62. Also, Dio, you are what Arn always aspired to be. You at least debate a good firestorm, and I do enjoy reading your posts. Arn does nothing but whine while adding nothing to the discussion. Also, I’m pretty certain you aren’t poor: another plus.

    On the other hand, I’m very suspicious that you are the head of NASA. If so, then you’ll never take me alive!

    Comment by bobcorker — February 19, 2008 @ 8:36 pm | Reply

  63. oh come on corker, you of all people should have recognized that I was doing an impersonation of you and mcpain.

    Comment by Arn — February 19, 2008 @ 8:39 pm | Reply

  64. The rules:

    1. Must be in a 6000 year earth.
    2. Must exclude ALL other ideas.
    3. Must not be refuted by the Bible.
    4. Sisyphus, Psycheout, and I must like it. If we don’t like it, it’s not true. End of discussion.

    Comment by bobcorker — February 18, 2008 @ 9:14 pm

    Now does that tell you why I quit trying to debate things sensibly? You don’t listen to logic, truth, or anything really.
    now go stick your head back up your ass where it belongs.
    Good bye all, and have a nice fight.

    Comment by Arn — February 19, 2008 @ 8:45 pm | Reply

  65. “Sisy, Corker, Psyche, Diablo, MarciaPP, and all the rest of you. You are sick perverted bastards that all need to die.”

    Hi!

    Comment by Sisyphus — February 19, 2008 @ 9:01 pm | Reply

  66. We will learn your religions inside out before annihilating them, just as the Christian humanists proposed we do.

    Then I dare you to learn of the Gnosis, and of Zarathustra. One is the personal religion of Jesus, the other is the first human to speak to God(as well as the prototype for Jesus– Zarathustra was granted a small level of divinity during birth, as light radiated from his body as he exited his mother’s womb, then giggled instead of cried[unlike any other baby]). Learn of why the churches you hold so dearly sought to shatter the original word of Jesus.

    There’s no evidence to support atheism, but you think it’s true. Christianity, on the other hand, has had many people have positive psychological moments, and is the world’s #1 religion. And unlike atheism, Christianity is often adopted by free will.

    Atheism as a personal belief is true. I, however, am not an Atheist. Good luck trying to guess mine. “Atheism”, “Satanism”, “Scientology”, and “Mormonism” are all incorrect guesses.

    Also, if it’s mostly by free will(which I won’t dispute entirely), then why the Missions, and why your(and B4B’s) desire to force everyone to become Christian, or else face nuclear bombs?

    Arn does nothing but whine while adding nothing to the discussion. Also, I’m pretty certain you aren’t poor: another plus.

    On the other hand, I’m very suspicious that you are the head of NASA. If so, then you’ll never take me alive!

    I’ve seen Arn make some strong arguments. I chalk his comments in this thread to sheer outrage, and I honestly don’t blame him.

    Money has nothing to do with the issue. A true Christian values not money. From the reason Jesus rebelled against the temples, to what Judas received for his “betrayal”(I think the fact that he did it for so little, plus the strong impace of Jesus’ death– points to the idea that it was orchestrated, to really get the message across to the still-questioning), money is the anti-christ.

    Comment by Dio Brando — February 19, 2008 @ 9:17 pm | Reply

  67. Also, I WISH I were the head of NASA. However, I do know how to correct orbits of things, so I suggest you move somewhere more remote and hidden.

    Comment by Dio Brando — February 19, 2008 @ 9:22 pm | Reply

  68. Hi!

    You are, that’s the problem. So stop being.

    Comment by Dio Brando — February 19, 2008 @ 9:26 pm | Reply

  69. “Given enough time, the “tolerant” left always reveals its true nature. The honesty is refreshing, as this is what they really harbor inside their black little hearts. It rarely is exposed to the light of day, since leftists are so dishonest, even with themselves. But once in awhile the truth leaks out.”
    In other words, Arn got trolled.

    Comment by Elephant Bones — February 19, 2008 @ 10:21 pm | Reply

  70. “You are, that’s the problem. So stop being.”

    Speak English or go back to Mexico, Dio.

    “In other words, Arn got trolled.”

    Whatever,

    Comment by Sisyphus — February 20, 2008 @ 7:14 am | Reply

  71. Speak English or go back to Mexico, Dio.

    In before someone tells Syphilis just who exactly Dio Brando is.

    Comment by Dio Brando — February 20, 2008 @ 7:02 pm | Reply

  72. “oh come on corker, you of all people should have recognized that I was doing an impersonation of you and mcpain.”

    This sounds like an on-the-spot excuse, and you and I both know this.

    Comment by bobcorker — February 21, 2008 @ 4:44 pm | Reply

  73. Regardless of whether or not this is a humor website, you are all disgusting individuals. If you are joking, what kind of mind even GOES to the places yours does? It’s NOT funny and I am a pretty laid-back type of guy when it comes to humor.

    If you are NOT joking, then you are all in serious need of some bitch-slapping upside your ignorant heads. What type of sick religion teaches you this crap?

    You should all go get a life and grow the hell up!

    Comment by John — March 1, 2008 @ 11:02 am | Reply

  74. I will pray for you, John.

    Comment by Sisyphus — March 3, 2008 @ 7:51 pm | Reply

  75. FUCK YOU CUNTS!!!!!

    Comment by Jesus Christ — March 6, 2008 @ 6:08 pm | Reply

  76. Wow. This has to be the longest post ever in the history of blogs.

    You should try to keep things a bit more brief if you don’t want everyone to think tl;dr (Netspeak for “Too Long;Didn’t Read.”)

    Comment by L — March 12, 2008 @ 3:21 pm | Reply

  77. One way to try to include the non- custodial parent or secondary custodian in the decision making regarding their child is for the parents to have joint legal custody. The law currently allows joint legal custody to be awarded, and in most cases it probably is awarded. OCGA 19- 9- 6 states, “‘Joint legal custody’ means both parents have equal rights and responsibilities for major decisions concerning the child, including the child’s education, health care, and religious training; provided, however, that the…

    Comment by Child Custody — March 15, 2008 @ 5:08 pm | Reply

  78. Wow. This is so offensive I don’t know whether to laugh, cry, or cheer on the terrorists you’re all so scared of.

    Comment by Serpentine — April 1, 2008 @ 5:16 am | Reply

  79. This is hilarious. I would love to be a fly on the wall and watch the writer compose this impotent tirade against half the population. Hilarious.

    Anybody with half a brain will read this and see it for what it is – highly-religious, bigoted drivel – and come to a similar conclusion that I have: This article is highly entertaining for comedic value. Apart from that, it has very little use for free-thinking individuals.

    I’m terribly sorry to hear how unhappy the writer seems to be with the modern state of the world. Women aren’t going anywhere, most certainly not humbly back into the kitchen, and their menstrual cycles and patterns are none of your business. Perhaps the “fairer” sex as they are sometimes referred to also speaks of their ability to weigh information with balance and fairness, rather than in the highly polarized and (frankly) laughable way of the author. He truly has, as his name implies, labored for nothing in this article.

    Comment by R. Watson — November 14, 2009 @ 5:57 pm | Reply

  80. You are a sick, sick bastard of a human. With out a woman you would not even exist. This kind of insane, crazy, political, bullshit propoganda makes me lose all my faith in human kind. Maybe you should go to an institution… or jail… or die.

    Comment by white32754 — April 26, 2012 @ 7:08 pm | Reply

  81. “impossible the earth is only 6000 years old and dragons are real” the earth IS over 6000 old but dragons are real

    Comment by d — March 2, 2013 @ 5:40 pm | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: