Blogs 4 Brownback

February 8, 2008

Faithmouse Friday

Filed under: Art,Faithmouse Friday,John McCain — Psycheout @ 4:27 pm
Tags: , ,

Faithmouse’s latest character is Pepe McCain.

Pepe McCain

How about a double shot?

Pepe McCain

Dan Lacey is a brilliant political cartoonist, as his latest work continues to prove. Well done, Dan!

— Psycheout

69 Comments »

  1. YIFF IN HELL FURFAGS

    Comment by Anonymous — February 8, 2008 @ 4:41 pm | Reply

  2. That’s brilliant? I could paint with my nipples and come up with something more brilliant.

    Comment by Dio Brando — February 8, 2008 @ 4:46 pm | Reply

  3. I could eat a bad tuna sandwich and the Bush InterContinental Airport, have explosive vomiting, aim it at a page, and still come up with something more brilliant

    Comment by Elephant Bones — February 8, 2008 @ 4:54 pm | Reply

  4. DB & EB: Prove it or shut it.

    Comment by Psycheout — February 8, 2008 @ 5:25 pm | Reply

  5. DAN BROWN

    First of all…..
    you can indeed paint, your Mother Theresa painting is indeed very well done.

    But as you stated on your website,
    it is time to bid SwastiKKKamouse farewell
    You don’t need this kind of crap to show your artistic and Christian values,

    please do not sink lower that posting on this worthless discrimination-triggering blog,
    there is much talent in you,
    use it properly instead of beeing an attention whore on a naziblog

    Comment by y7699 — February 8, 2008 @ 5:25 pm | Reply

  6. DB & EB: Prove it or shut it.

    Comment By PsyKKKeout

    lol….prove us anything that you claimed, PsyKKKeout…..a picture of your so called flat planet to begin with….

    Comment by y7699 — February 8, 2008 @ 5:30 pm | Reply

  7. His name is Dan Lacey, not DAN BROWN.

    He is a talented painter and cartoonist.

    He doesn’t post his cartoons here, I do.

    You probably lose all credibility with Dan by calling his comic strip “SwastiKKKamouse” and by labelling him an “attention whore.”

    This is not a “naziblog.” You are an idiot, y7699. Thanks for reading.

    Comment by Psycheout — February 8, 2008 @ 5:43 pm | Reply

  8. His name is Dan Lacey, not DAN BROWN.
    ERRATUM HUMANUM EST

    He is a talented painter and cartoonist.
    As I stated, he has talents indeed….learn to read, dyslectic weirdo
    (but yeah, since you blame handicaps to be gods punishment, PsyKKKeout, you are truly punished indeed)

    He doesn’t post his cartoons here, I do.
    (hope he will not sue you for that)

    You probably lose all credibility with Dan by calling his comic strip “SwastiKKKamouse” and by labelling him an “attention whore.”
    (So what?)

    This is not a “naziblog.” You are an idiot, y7699. Thanks for reading.
    (hehe, that’s a very nazi reply….hope it gave you a big ego boost posting this comment……indeed, you have convinced me that you are not a nazi….you are worse)

    Comment by y7699 — February 8, 2008 @ 5:52 pm | Reply

  9. You are an idiot, y7699.

    Hey pot, this is kettle. YOU’RE BLACK.

    DB & EB: Prove it or shut it.

    Gaze upon my brilliance.

    Comment by Dio Brando — February 8, 2008 @ 5:54 pm | Reply

  10. And yeah, PsyKKKeout….it is YOU who is the attention whore here….you even beat Paris Hilton in sucking.
    Congrats.

    Comment by y7699 — February 8, 2008 @ 5:55 pm | Reply

  11. @Psycheout on Comment #7

    BAAAAAAAWWWWWWWWWWWW

    Comment by Anonymous — February 8, 2008 @ 6:28 pm | Reply

  12. (thank you for support, Anonymus……but ain’t all his comments just BAAAAAAAWWWWWWWWWWWW…..)

    In fact he is not only dyslectic but also the most dull repeat performance in the known universe.

    Comment by y7699 — February 8, 2008 @ 7:01 pm | Reply

  13. @Psycheout

    I heard you won 2 tickets to the Super BAAAWWWWWWLLL

    Comment by The Nobody — February 8, 2008 @ 8:44 pm | Reply

  14. Road roller da! BAWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW!

    Comment by Dio Brando — February 8, 2008 @ 8:52 pm | Reply

  15. Oh no! Psycheout is upset about something. Quickly, someone call for a WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAmbulance.

    Comment by The Nobody — February 8, 2008 @ 8:56 pm | Reply

  16. You can always count on the lefties, just like clock-work…

    Ready……..Action – 8.SPAM, 9.SPAM, 10.SPAM, 11.SPAM, 12.SPAM, 13.SPAM 14. SPAM.

    Any ideas?

    –Jeremiah–

    Comment by Jeremiah — February 8, 2008 @ 9:59 pm | Reply

  17. You can always count on the right-wing “religious” baby-killing racists to pop up like…oh wait, they can’t tell time.

    Any ideas?

    Well, according to Syphilis, you should slap your mother for not being barefoot and pregnant.

    Comment by Dio Brando — February 8, 2008 @ 10:32 pm | Reply

  18. I’ve got an idea…Sisyphus and Psycheout should lay the gavel down on you kooks, until you can come back and make half sense.

    If you can’t…then that’ll just be tooooo bad.

    This blog is representing a decent, and honest God-fearing Christian man, Mr. Sam Brownback.

    His blog shouldn’t be a home for the maggots of the world.

    –Jeremiah–

    Comment by Jeremiah — February 8, 2008 @ 10:51 pm | Reply

  19. This blog is representing a decent, and honest God-fearing Christian man, Mr. Sam Brownback.

    His blog shouldn’t be a home for the maggots of the world.

    Evidently, you missed the entries where they called for genocide, nuclear war, and viciously beating any woman who dares to get an education– or spend her time wearing shoes and not carrying a child.

    Comment by Dio Brando — February 8, 2008 @ 11:21 pm | Reply

  20. Evidently, you missed the entries where they called for genocide, nuclear war, and viciously beating any woman who dares to get an education– or spend her time wearing shoes and not carrying a child.

    That’s what I’m talkin’ about, retarded, cross-vision rhetoric that isn’t true. Typical Liberal Propaganda. Nothing more than lies.

    It shouldn’t pass!

    –Jeremiah–

    Comment by Jeremiah — February 8, 2008 @ 11:36 pm | Reply

  21. That’s what I’m talkin’ about, retarded, cross-vision rhetoric that isn’t true. Typical Liberal Propaganda. Nothing more than lies.

    No, idiot.

    Check this.
    (this one calls for genocide and nuclear war)

    And this.
    (this one suggests that women who are dumb, barefoot, and constantly pregnant, should be taught a lesson. The classic lesson? A thrashing.)

    Marty McPain, another one of you idiots, has proudly proclaimed that he not only viciously beats his children in public, but destroys their things, all to make a lesson.

    Comment by Dio Brando — February 9, 2008 @ 12:11 am | Reply

  22. “DB & EB: Prove it or shut it.”
    I HAVE DONE AN ART

    Comment by Elephant Bones — February 9, 2008 @ 1:16 am | Reply

  23. Pepe McCain? How unoriginal to to steal a Warner Brothers Looney Tunes charactor created by Chuck Jones for an agenda.

    Dan Lacey may be a decent artist but must be out of his own ideas to plagiarise someone elses copyrighted work, clearly against the law. I’m sure the fines are higher than Sisyphus’ and Psycheouts salaries for reproducing and broadcasting other peoples plagiarisms.

    Comment by spacebrother — February 9, 2008 @ 6:13 am | Reply

  24. That’s what I’m talkin’ about, retarded, cross-vision rhetoric that isn’t true. Typical Liberal Propaganda. Nothing more than lies.

    Yeah, it´s not like both the mods and some of the commenters eagerly endorese such nice ideas like genocide against non-christians. They hav only done so in a ton of articles, but hey, I guess they were just joking.

    Damn, that´s quite a wall of ignorance you have erected there.

    The comic´s a rather patethic attempt on stealing a good cartoon character.

    PS: Aghhh, furries! This article is unclean, it has to be purged!

    Comment by PG — February 9, 2008 @ 8:15 am | Reply

  25. Jeremiah is just Sisyphus behind a proxy on his own crappy blog. What a troll, ladies and gentlemen.

    Comment by The Nobody — February 9, 2008 @ 11:03 am | Reply

  26. Also, YIFF IN HELL FURFAG

    Comment by The Nobody — February 9, 2008 @ 11:11 am | Reply

  27. KILL IT WITH FIRE

    Comment by Elephant Bones — February 9, 2008 @ 12:07 pm | Reply

  28. That’s what I’m talkin’ about, retarded, cross-vision rhetoric that isn’t true. Typical Liberal Propaganda. Nothing more than lies.

    Here, have some proof:

    Genocide:
    https://blogs4brownback.wordpress.com/2007/12/28/just-kill-the-iranians/

    Racism: Too many to list, just see above for an example

    Sexism:
    https://blogs4brownback.wordpress.com/2007/09/19/study-women-are-harlots/
    https://blogs4brownback.wordpress.com/2008/02/04/gods-plan-for-your-wife-barefoot-and-pregnant/

    Will believe anything FOX says:
    https://blogs4brownback.wordpress.com/2008/02/08/1388/
    https://blogs4brownback.wordpress.com/2008/01/16/massturbation-effect/
    https://blogs4brownback.wordpress.com/2007/10/12/early-christmas-alert-nintendo-ds/
    https://blogs4brownback.wordpress.com/2008/01/01/4chan-totally-gay/

    inb4imaleftistheathenfaggot, mirite?

    Comment by Tinlion — February 9, 2008 @ 2:01 pm | Reply

  29. YOU BEST BE JOKING, NIGGER!

    Comment by Anonymous — February 9, 2008 @ 2:14 pm | Reply

  30. Just remember, boys – You’re gonna reap what you sow!

    –Jeremiah–

    Comment by Jeremiah — February 9, 2008 @ 3:16 pm | Reply

  31. Just remember, boys – You’re gonna reap what you sow

    and you are gonna be raped by a sow, Jerebias

    Comment by y6799 — February 9, 2008 @ 3:21 pm | Reply

  32. As soon as the rapeture comes you won’t be able to sit on your ass again.

    Comment by y6799 — February 9, 2008 @ 3:22 pm | Reply

  33. Just like how you sow your seed in the behinds of little boys?

    Comment by Dio Brando — February 9, 2008 @ 3:33 pm | Reply

  34. Jeremiah, lay off the little boys. It’s making you crazy, man.

    Comment by Dio Brando — February 9, 2008 @ 3:34 pm | Reply

  35. it looks like the skunk is kissing a child.

    premarital sex, pedophilia, bestiality…it was lesbianism last week, right? i thought faithmouse was christian? because those are some serious sins, right there.

    Comment by kat — February 9, 2008 @ 5:19 pm | Reply

  36. Just remember, boys – You’re gonna reap what you sow

    I have a huuuuuge, shiny mirror here…..

    Comment by PG — February 9, 2008 @ 5:24 pm | Reply

  37. I concocted the best idea to piss someone off:

    1. Get the cell phone number of someone you hate
    2. Find a payphone (make sure to have a lot of coins on hand)
    3. Call the person at a time where they will not pick up the phone (ie: school, work, etc.)
    4. When going to voice mail, sing the first verse of the “Fresh Prince of Bel-Air” song.**
    5. Hang up and call back, to sing the next verse.
    6. Repeat step 5 until the song is complete*
    7. ????
    8. PROFIT

    *for additional lulz, do this until their voice mailbox is full
    **for a more nuanced form of lulz, use “Never gonna give you up” by Rick Astley

    Comment by The Nobody — February 9, 2008 @ 5:46 pm | Reply

  38. The cartoon depicts McCain just exactly like he is – A Sodomite coddler.

    This election is probably one of the worst we’ve had in election history.

    Sodomite coddlers on all sides.

    What a sick, sick world we live in.

    –Jeremiah–

    Comment by Jeremiah — February 9, 2008 @ 8:19 pm | Reply

  39. What a sick, sick world we live in. -Jeremiah

    It is, but once we purge it of people like you, everything should be fine.

    Comment by The Nobody — February 9, 2008 @ 9:08 pm | Reply

  40. No need to worry, Mr. Nobody, you’ll be rid of me soon enough…and the best part is, I won’t have to worry about you sickos anymore!!!!!

    –Jeremiah–

    Comment by Jeremiah — February 9, 2008 @ 11:36 pm | Reply

  41. No need to worry, Mr. Nobody, you’ll be rid of me soon enough…and the best part is, I won’t have to worry about you sickos anymore!!!!!

    You’re already dead! ATATATATATATATA~!

    Comment by Kenshiro — February 10, 2008 @ 4:32 am | Reply

  42. @Jerry

    Remember the rule with exclamation points: It’s one or none.

    Comment by The Nobody — February 10, 2008 @ 8:36 am | Reply

  43. Hi Jeremiah, I must say, you are my favorite conservative on this blog🙂. (Though the competition is not exactly difficult to beat :S.)

    I like the way that you used scripture in one of your posts, but the way that in [Post 25.] you were accused of being that

    stupid, racist, sexist fool who attempts to insult people by using negative language to describe a rite that may not exist in a ‘pagan’ faith, when such a person has given NO indication of what religion he follows (or does not follow as the case may be)… (opps, sorry about the rant-I don’t forget stuff like that)

    Sisyphus. It was a bit mean.

    However.

    [Post 20.] Raised an eyebrow, but I was curious to see your reaction when evidence was given (I knew that the Liberals would respond with links), unfortunately I see no response from you on this. It would please me greatly if you would give one. Or if you were incorrect, say so… we’re all human [fallible, imperfect]. PLEASE don’t ignore this… help restore my faith in the honesty and intelligence of the human race.

    To all liberals commenting on this blog: if Jeremiah was incorrect, and he sates this, then let him be!

    Comment by Austin — February 10, 2008 @ 8:33 pm | Reply

  44. Austin,

    I don’t know how to take you, so I’m going to err on the side of caution…and is what I mean by that is, you sound a weeee-bit like a Leftie. So forgive me if a misread you, kay?

    to describe a rite that may not exist in a ‘pagan’ faith

    Sodomy … a “right”? No, it is a choice. A right, in my view, is something which does not require the assistance of another human being. Anything which requires the assistance of another human being cannot be considered a “right”. Why? Because God gives us a just right to life, and is thus, given to us for the claiming. In other words, we are blessed with freedom, but only confined to those boundaries and limits in which God has set in place.
    This is where choice comes in — when God grants the ability or perception to judge between right and wrong, we have a duty, to take it upon ourselves to make the wise decision for our own sake, and for the glory of God.

    Sodomy is not a religious ritual, it is not a an “inhereted disorder,” it is not an “imperfection”. It takes a healthy mind to commit Sodomy, and is a product of the choice that God gave to man. Just like murder is a choice. But then one must say, “how so,”? What must it be then? What is it called? SIN! What does sin do? The bible says that when sin is conceived or fully-grown, it gives birth to what? ‘Death’! Sodomy is a Deadly sin. Read the little book of Jude, where it talks about Sodom and Gomorrah, it says, ‘The people who suffered the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah serve as an example for those who will suffer Eternal Torment.’ ANd that transcends until the end of this earth, or until Jesus Christ returns in all His glory.

    Am I a sodomite? No, I can’t stand the perverted sick people. They’ve been deceived by Satan, and that’s just really sad to see them destroy themselves like that.

    evidence

    What evidence? There was evidence that Psycheout, as do I, as does George W. Bush, as does anyone with a head firmly planted on their shoulders, that we have real enemies out there, that would slit an American’s throat in a heartbeat if they could get the chance. Will I give them that chance? No way! We will defeat those enemies at all costs. Just as our forefathers gave life and limb to end the evil practice known as slavery, and protect our freedoms.

    I don’t know about you…..? But I don’t want to live in this country under Sharia Law … and that’s exactly what we would get, if the Liberals had their way.

    And for this last little tidbit if Jeremiah was incorrect, and he sates this, then let him be! We can go to the book of Revelation when the Lord spake … But the cowardly, the unbelieving, the vile, the murderers, the sexually immoral, those who practice magic arts, the idolaters and all liars–their place will be in the fiery lake of burning sulfur. This is the second death.

    That’s what I mean when they will reap what they sow. Not “nuke” them. What an absurdity!!!

    How in the world could I “nuke” someone..??? Do I call for the “nuking” of someone? No, of course not, because that would render me judgmental and taking the place of the Almighty, and ain’t no one can take His place.

    But I do know this, that God expects that we have laws that uphold His laws, and if someone disobeys those laws that the law should be carried out accordingly in order that justice may be served…for without laws of justice, the innocent will suffer, and God doesn’t want to see that happen. It’s not right, and it would make God very angry. If we don’t carry out justice then God will, and He wouldn’t just be mad at those committing the crimes, but He would be furious with those who sit back and allowed good people to suffer in fear and torment of those murderers running on a rampage.

    we’re all human [fallible, imperfect]

    Yes we are, and we have a choice, to either obey God and His commandments, or fall to the hands of Satan and be lost for Eternity in Hell.

    Sounds harsh, but that’s just the way it is, my friend. God was merciful enough to give us life, but He hates sin, and won’t tolerate it. Do remember this, if you remember anything, that God has provided a way, through the Cross at Calvary, when Jesus shed His innocent blood and died for the sins of all mankind, that they might make the decision, turn from their sin, and understand that He still loves them, that they might be saved, and be spared the torment of Eternity in Hell and live forever in Heaven where there will be no more suffering and tears.

    –Jeremiah–

    P.S. If I’ve taken you wrong please do verify–you might already be saved, if so, that’s ok, there might be someone else here who needs and will accept God’s plan for their life.

    God bless!

    Comment by Jeremiah — February 11, 2008 @ 12:02 am | Reply

  45. How in the world could I “nuke” someone..??? Do I call for the “nuking” of someone? No, of course not, because that would render me judgmental and taking the place of the Almighty, and ain’t no one can take His place.

    So then, you agree with me that genocide– and we’re talking killing every man, woman, and child that isn’t a white Christian, or at least Christian– is wrong?

    That’s the point I’ve been hammering against you. Because the rest of the B4B staff all support this genocide, as I pointed out through my links from B4B itself.

    Comment by Dio Brando — February 11, 2008 @ 12:10 am | Reply

  46. Because the rest of the B4B staff all support this genocide

    You know lying is wrong too. Don’t you?

    You can’t “HONESTLY” sit there and say that B4Bers here call for genocide!!!! Because it’s not true!!!

    We want to eliminate our enemies, like Al Qaeda, and the Jihadists…who murder people in cowardly suicide missions!!

    Wake Up!

    –Jeremiah–

    Comment by Jeremiah — February 11, 2008 @ 12:34 am | Reply

  47. You can’t “HONESTLY” sit there and say that B4Bers here call for genocide!!!! Because it’s not true!!!

    Now, how did we solve the problem we had with the unreasonable Japanese terrorists over 60 years ago? Diplomacy? Surrender? Hugs? Foreign aid (bribes)? Rounds of kum-ba-ya? No. We defeated them, utterly. We destroyed them, completely. We showed absolutely no mercy. We bravely dropped the two newly developed atomic bombs, ultimately saving millions of lives. That’s what America does.

    Translation: “In order to solve our problems, we need total annihilation of the enemy. Atomic bombs shall be our tools, for they cannot be stopped. With these, they shall immediately bow down and give up.”

    I’m linking to B4B, you illiterate turd.

    Do I need to copy and paste the definition of “Genocide” again? Or can you agree that the intentional destruction and devastation(on the scale of zero-existence) of a group or groups is a genocide?

    They’re not asking to keep the troops abroad. Psycheout, in that post, called for nuclear strikes on the middle east. There is no selective nuclear bomb, so unless the middle east is magically filled only with men and women who love to wage holy war, you’re going to murder millions of innocent men, women, and children. Before you say that they are ALL terrorists, realize that there are Christians living in the middle east.

    Therefore, you’d be killing a few million Christians.

    Oh hey, remember when Christ was about peace?

    Comment by Dio Brando — February 11, 2008 @ 3:32 am | Reply

  48. Oh, and in case you’re exactly that retarded, click on the reddish text in my post above.

    Comment by Dio Brando — February 11, 2008 @ 3:33 am | Reply

  49. Oh, and in case you’re exactly that retarded, click on the reddish text in my post above.

    And we just hope that he ain’t colourblind, Dio….lolol
    Greetings from another one with a reddish text.

    Comment by y7699 — February 11, 2008 @ 5:59 am | Reply

  50. We know he’s at least one kind of blind.

    Comment by Dio Brando — February 11, 2008 @ 5:36 pm | Reply

  51. Psycheout, Sam, Sisyphus, and B4B team.

    I encourage you guys to come forth and present your cases, and set the record straight.

    Dio Brando, y7699, and any other Liberals here who agree, or want to agree with them are clearly here for one reason, to conflate the truth into something it’s not and make you out to be “mass murderers.” They should not get away with it.

    What’s wrong them…????

    Anyone with an ounce of brains clearly knows that we have enemies, and that we want to minimize the potential of attacks done to us by our enemies, and that precision strikes are needed to defeat our enemies, to spare innocent lives from being destroyed BY the enemy.
    Those good Christians Dio speaks of, are the same Christians who persecuted and killed every day by cowardly demons who think they’re going to inheret a bunch of “booty” … Ha! The only those people are going to inheret is Hell. They aren’t interested in diplomacy, no, they’re interested in one thing, and one thing only, blood! and that’s NO exaggeration!!

    I mean … who wants live in fear of demons who want to destroy you??

    So, again, I would encourage you to strike these spineless accusations down. We can’t afford good people to be mislead into thinking that we don’t have enemies.

    –Jeremiah–

    Comment by Jeremiah — February 11, 2008 @ 6:37 pm | Reply

  52. As far as unrepentant atheists being allowed to live, what’s the point? They’ve made up their minds, and they could potentially deconvert Christians. I’m against death unless that someone is dangerous to other souls or the physical body. Muslims, for instance, usually want to kill Christians. If they don’t accept Christianity, then they are terrorusts. Not all Muslims are terrorists, but all terrorists are Muslims. Even if we execute ‘innocent’ Muslims, we will be greatly decreasing terrorism by Muslim executions.

    I’m sorry if this sounds like genocide, but with these very real threats, it is the only way.

    Comment by bobcorker — February 11, 2008 @ 6:45 pm | Reply

  53. If they don’t accept Christianity, then they are terrorusts.

    […]Even if we execute ‘innocent’ Muslims, we will be greatly decreasing terrorism by Muslim executions.

    I’m sorry if this sounds like genocide, but with these very real threats, it is the only way.

    I rest my case, Jeremiah. Sam Brownback has nothing to do with B4B, other than use of his name. He’s a heliocentrist, and doesn’t believe in committing genocide. He also backs McCain, because he believes he has the right visions.

    His stances.

    “Brownback has said that he supports immigration reform because the Bible says to welcome the stranger.”

    So he’s not xenophobic, like B4B is.

    “Brownback visited refugee camps in Sudan in 2004 and returned to write a resolution labeling the Darfur conflict as genocide, and has been active on attempting to increase U.S. efforts to resolve the situation short of military intervention.[30] He is an endorser of the Genocide Intervention Network, which called him a “champion of Darfur” in its Darfur scorecard, primarily for his early advocacy of the Darfur Peace and Accountability Act.”

    He understands the horrors of genocide.

    He IS pro-life in all cases(even incest and rape– the former making no logic whatsoever), but admits that he can support a pro-choice candidate.

    “Brownback supports the use of cord blood stem cell research for research and treatment, instead of embryonic stem cells”

    And with the discovery of skin-based stem cells, embryonic stem cells are almost moot.

    “Brownback said in an interview, “I am not a supporter of a death penalty, other than in cases where we cannot protect the society and have other lives at stake.”[41] In a speech on the Senate Judiciary Committee, he questioned the current use of the death penalty as potentially incongruent with the notion of a “culture of life”, and suggesting for its employment in a more limited fashion.[42] However, he voted YES on making federal death penalty appeals harder and voted NO on maintaining right of habeas corpus in Death Penalty Appeals.[20] These two votes, on the other hand, occurred before his conversion to Catholicism in 2002 — since his conversion, he has echoed John Paul II’s remarks against the death penalty. On Jan. 31, 2007, Brownback introduced the Federal Death Penalty Abolition Act of 2007 to the Senate: this act would abolish the death penalty under Federal law.”

    He’s opposed to the death penalty, and is also a Catholic.

    “Brownback introduced into the Senate a resolution (Senate Joint Resolution 4) calling for the United States to apologize for past mistreatment of Native Americans.”

    Note that, too.

    Comment by Dio Brando — February 11, 2008 @ 7:30 pm | Reply

  54. I rest my case, Jeremiah.

    BWAAAA HA HA HA HAAAAAA!

    I’m surprised you even function from day to day, my friend! *chuckles*

    Now, it’s time for the B4B team to bring the cases, and settle this matter, once and for all.

    –Jeremiah–

    Comment by Jeremiah — February 11, 2008 @ 11:19 pm | Reply

  55. @51 and 53

    Seems Bob and Jerry have been sleeping with eachother too long
    Trollporn is disgusting!

    Comment by y7699 — February 12, 2008 @ 12:50 am | Reply

  56. BWAAAA HA HA HA HAAAAAA!

    I’m surprised you even function from day to day, my friend! *chuckles*

    You’re an illiterate EUPHEMISM FOR HOMOSEXUALITY. I’m surprised you don’t mouth breathe.

    If they don’t accept Christianity, then they are terrorusts.

    […]Even if we execute ‘innocent’ Muslims, we will be greatly decreasing terrorism by Muslim executions.

    I’m sorry if this sounds like genocide, but with these very real threats, it is the only way.

    Comment by Dio Brando — February 12, 2008 @ 1:06 am | Reply

  57. So again, you f*cktard, what’s in bold italics is DIRECT QUOTING FROM B4B.

    Comment by Dio Brando — February 12, 2008 @ 1:07 am | Reply

  58. …Faggot.

    Comment by Jotaro Kujo — February 12, 2008 @ 1:07 am | Reply

  59. And Jeremiah falls for a man named Mariah….
    with a big moustache and leather pants
    that he loves to lick on his rear end

    Comment by y7699 — February 12, 2008 @ 6:55 am | Reply

  60. (thus his presence on Blogs for Brownlips)

    Comment by y7699 — February 12, 2008 @ 6:56 am | Reply

  61. 54. 55. 56. 57. 58. 59. blah, blah, blah, lies and filth, lies and filth..

    You people idolize Gerry Studds, you’ve backed every Sodomite “pride” parade, backed every Sodomized marriage.

    You’re the party of the Sodomites!!!

    So get out of my face, you disgraceful fools!!!

    Oooooooewh *chills* … Sick people!

    –Jeremiah–

    Comment by Jeremiah — February 12, 2008 @ 3:49 pm | Reply

  62. You people idolize Gerry Studds, you’ve backed every Sodomite “pride” parade, backed every Sodomized marriage.

    I don’t even know who the hell Gerry Studds is.

    Also, I QUOTED FROM B4B DIRECTLY, YOU GIGANTIC QUEEF. I KNOW YOU’RE TOO F*CKING RETARDED TO CLICK THE LINK, THE LINK THAT LEADS DIRECTLY TO THE QUOTES I COPIED AND PASTED STRAIGHT FROM.

    You’re the party of the Sodomites!!!

    …said the boy who sodomizes his own father.

    So get out of my face, you disgraceful fools!!!

    Get your in-the-closet ass out of here, and we’ll vanish.

    Comment by Dio Brando — February 12, 2008 @ 4:24 pm | Reply

  63. 61. Dio Brando,

    Buddy, you don’t know me from Adam. So you ain’t got no business spoutin’ of crap you don’t know anything about. So I advise you to shut up, while your still ahead.

    –Jeremiah–

    Comment by Jeremiah — February 12, 2008 @ 5:37 pm | Reply

  64. Buddy, you don’t know me from Adam.

    Yeah, it’s hard to tell when you’re having sex with each other, amirite?

    So you ain’t got no business spoutin’ of crap you don’t know anything about.

    Funny, I linked to B4B, and gave numerous direct quotes. You sir, are the balds.

    So I advise you to shut up, while your still ahead.

    I advise you to make that threat much clearer, so I can report this site to the FBI.

    Comment by Dio Brando — February 12, 2008 @ 6:05 pm | Reply

  65. Hey Jeremiah, thank you for replying to my post, it brought smiles, so a big metaphorical hug (emotion and intent [in this case gratitude] sans physical action).

    However, as i am absolutely site and I mean pure crap, at getting my meaning across, I’m going to have to try again.

    In ref. to post 42.:

    By the word rite, I meant ritual, you know, for example, The Jewish Rite of Circumcision, or The Christian Rite of Baptism. It was not a misspelling/typo.

    Referring to both posts 42. and 43.:

    “Stupid, racist, sexist fool who attempts to insult people by using negative language to describe a rite that may not exist in a ‘pagan’ faith, when such a person has given NO indication of what religion he follows”

    I’m sorry, but i just CAN’T find anything in the above foolish rant of mine that implies and form of homosexual relations. Although, if I were to say this (hypothetically speaking, of course):

    ‘Insult people by using negative language to describe a rgite that may not exist’ [read: right for two same sex partners to have romantic relations], I can kind of see how you might come to that conclusion, in actual fact, I was referring to this:

    https://blogs4brownback.wordpress.com/2007/12/27/special-announcement/

    It sent me into a fury.

    Post 28. My response is on Post 36.

    Sisyphus assumed that i was a neo-pagan, apparently, as I take a very neutral take on all religions, so a not give ANY indication on what mine is. Or isn’t, may be, will be or won’t be (‘is’ can also be replaced with ‘are’).

    I thought that the general Christian belief was that the earth ends and Jesus returns at the same time, or that one happens because of the other. Am I wrong, or are following a religion that does not believe this. Or have I misinterpreted you, cuz if I have, oops😦.

    Evidence:

    Pose 20.
    Evidently, you missed the entries where they called for genocide, nuclear war, and viciously beating any woman who dares to get an education– or spend her time wearing shoes and not carrying a child.

    That’s what I’m talkin’ about, retarded, cross-vision rhetoric that isn’t true. Typical Liberal Propaganda. Nothing more than lies.

    It shouldn’t pass!

    –Jeremiah–”

    I meant evidence where the left-wingers would provide you with links where these were advocated, nothing else, nothing about if doing so was right, of just, or wrong, but that IT WAS ADVOCATED (<-that’s my new word :D)

    And i don’t mean you, just some others, you would appreciate the consequences, why, oil may become radio-active… Chemo all round! (And prices go up, and up, and upppppp).

    Actually, by “if Jeremiah was incorrect, and he sates this, then let him be!” all i meant was, that if you were wrong in post 20. Don’t go on about it or anything…

    With the exception to this, “He would be furious with those who sit back and allowed good people to suffer in fear and torment of those murderers running on a rampage.” the rest of what you said was pure inanity (to myself at least), the only reason i liked that line was cuz it gave me an insight into a motivation of yours.

    “If I’ve taken you wrong please do verify–you might already be saved” I take this to mean if i will reveal to you my belief/religion/faith (or none of the above). I will not. I am not going to give up the one thing that allows me to interject conversations on this site with a religiously neutral observation, it’s wayyy to enjoyable.

    On a final note; “So forgive me if a misread you”

    Man, totally forgiven, I like “sound[ing] a weeee-bit like [enter opposing idea/belief]” makes for good conversation. Usually

    Comment by Austin — February 12, 2008 @ 6:51 pm | Reply

  66. Man, totally forgiven, I like …. “sound[ing] a weeee-bit like [enter opposing idea/belief]” makes for good conversation.

    Give or take, it matters not … in the former sense. Because I’ve already been forgiven.

    As turns out, my convictions as it were, however construed it may sound on my part, yet it is, when backed by the word of Almighty God… sadly, true.

    It sent me into a fury.

    Hey, the convictions of the heart leads one to their conscience, as anything which sheds any light on an evil deed, the nature of that soul will ultimately come out. And herein lies the crux of the matter – as I take a very neutral take on all religions …… ?!?!?

    WOW! Impressive … to say the least. I give you this, my friend, and then I’ll let you be…

    ‘Who is it that overcomes the world? He that believeth that Jesus is the Son of God.

    And that’s no neutralistic eumpemism … that’s telling you exactly what you need, if you wish to escape Satan’s snares.

    I would encourage you to rethink your take on life, for it’s the only chance you have of receiving the plan that God has for your life. For any choice that steps outside the will of God, is one more step toward rejection! A scary thought!

    ‘Forgive them, Father, they know not what they do.’

    –Jeremiah–

    Comment by Jeremiah — February 13, 2008 @ 11:12 am | Reply

  67. So you ain’t got no business spoutin’ of crap you don’t know anything about. – Jeremiah

    Learn to spell, christfag.

    Comment by The Nobody — February 13, 2008 @ 5:20 pm | Reply

  68. Also aber rathe ich euch, meine Freunde: misstraut Allen, in welchen der Trieb, zu strafen, mächtig ist! Das ist Volk schlechter Art und Abkunft; aus ihren Gesichtern blickt der Henker und der Spürhund. Misstraut allen Denen, die viel von ihrer Gerechtigkeit reden! Wahrlich, ihren Seelen fehlt es nicht nur an Honig. Und wenn sie sich selber ‘die Guten und Gerechten’ nennen, so vergesst nicht, dass ihnen zum Pharisäer Nichts fehlt als — Macht!

    But thus I counsel you, my friends: Mistrust all in whom the impulse to punish is powerful. They are people of a low sort and stock; the hangman and the bloodhound look out of their faces. Mistrust all who talk much of their justice! Verily, their souls lack more than honey. And when they call themselves the good and the just, do not forget that they would be pharisees, if only they had — power.

    Ch.29, The Tarantulas (Thus Spoke Zarathustra)

    Comment by Dio Brando — February 13, 2008 @ 6:27 pm | Reply

  69. You are beyond beeing off topic Jeremariah…..this tread is about SwastiKKKamouse and nothing else.

    (Es ist Kacke wen man doof ist, und man ist doof wenn man Kacke isst…..du bist die leider beides, Jeremariah)
    (Thus spoke Reswatius)

    Comment by y7699 — February 14, 2008 @ 10:07 am | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: