Blogs 4 Brownback

February 4, 2008

Rick Santorum Flashback: Speaking Truth To Power

SodomyAs we head into Super Tuesday, I thought it would be useful to flash back on true conservatism.  Mike Huckabee is probably the closest candidate to true conservatism in the race and he expected to be taking up the rear unless good Christians pray and vote fervently.

Why don’t this season’s Republicans bravely speak the truth like this?  Rick Santorum did just a few short years ago.

“This whole idea of personal autonomy, well I don’t think most conservatives hold that point of view. Some do. They have this idea that people should be left alone, be able to do whatever they want to do, government should keep our taxes down and keep our regulations low, that we shouldn’t get involved in the bedroom, we shouldn’t get involved in cultural issues. You know, people should do whatever they want. Well, that is not how traditional conservatives view the world and I think most conservatives understand that individuals can’t go it alone. That there is no such society that I am aware of, where we’ve had radical individualism and that it succeeds as a culture.”

Absolutely.  Look in the Constitution.  Does it grant the right to sodomy?  Uh, no it doesn’t.  Does it grant unrestricted “privacy rights” to commit perversions that sicken the soul and make Jesus cry?  Obviously not.  Our Founding Fathers who received divine inspiration to write the Constitution never had sodomy in mind when they wrote our founding documents.

Had they envisioned the perverse and fallen culture of modern times, they would have written an anti-sodomy amendment to the Constitution.  You can take that to the bank.

And there is no guaranteed right to privacy in the Constitution.  Look for it if you must, but you’ll never find it.  If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear, after all.  What are you doing in your bedroom that you are ashamed of?  Sinful and illegal acts?  Then you should be punished, just as any street criminal or drug dealer.

Do you have the inalienable right to smoke crack cocaine in the privacy of your own home?  No, you do not.  You also have no protected or special right to sodomize others in your den of sin.  Make no mistake about it, fornicators, your days are numbered.

I’m sure the ACLU would love to work to amend the Constitution to allow gay marriage, sodomy, bestiality, furries, necrophilia, child porn, ABDL, abortion,  man on dog sex, terrorism and a whole host of liberal passtimes.  But before you engage in unrestrained Saturnalia, you must first sully the Constitution with the help of 2/3 of the states.  Good luck with that, moonbats and perverts.  It’ll never happen before the Rapture comes.  And then you can do what thou wilt while writhing in agony.  And who’d be laughing then?

— Psycheout

22 Comments »

  1. Cool, the temples of Khajuraho in India. Been there, seen that…..you should go to India as well, PsyKKKout, it would make you a more humble person.

    Comment by Jim — February 4, 2008 @ 10:29 am | Reply

  2. Do you have the inalienable right to smoke crack cocaine in the privacy of your own home?

    maybe not, but still G.W.Bush did use cocaine as well.

    Comment by Jim — February 4, 2008 @ 10:30 am | Reply

  3. Will you now legalize Crack cause your president is a nosefiller?

    Comment by Jim — February 4, 2008 @ 10:31 am | Reply

  4. Well now we’re all sure of one thing: Psycheout has never, ever gotten any.

    Comment by Adam Nelson — February 4, 2008 @ 10:55 am | Reply

  5. So says another one of the “terrorists for Brownback”
    Just because you never have sex doesn’t give you the right to try and say we can’t.

    Comment by Arn — February 4, 2008 @ 11:25 am | Reply

  6. If he can’t have it, nobody can.

    Besides, I thought governments controlling all aspects of personal lives was… *gasp* communist! Leave it to Comrade Psycheout to not only support a new wave of oppression, but not even an original one!

    Comment by Adam Nelson — February 4, 2008 @ 11:57 am | Reply

  7. You know what really makes me cry? This blog and everyone that supports it.

    Comment by Jesus Christ, your lord and saviour — February 4, 2008 @ 1:07 pm | Reply

  8. >Mike Huckabee is probably the closest candidate to true conservatism in the race and he expected to be taking up the rear unless good Christians pray and vote fervently.
    >Mike Huckabee is probably the closest candidate to true conservatism in the race and he expected to be taking up the rear
    >he expected to be taking up the rear
    >taking up the rear
    ಠ_ಠ

    “And there is no guaranteed right to privacy in the Constitution.”
    Ammendment IV: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

    Comment by Elephant Bones — February 4, 2008 @ 1:46 pm | Reply

  9. lol, EB…..very sharp of you

    Up the ass, just like the closet case guys that run this site…

    Comment by Jim — February 4, 2008 @ 1:52 pm | Reply

  10. You know what really makes me cry? This blog and everyone that supports it.

    Comment by Jesus Christ, your lord and saviour — February 4, 2008 @ 1:07 pm

    LOL

    Comment by Anonymous — February 4, 2008 @ 4:09 pm | Reply

  11. “And there is no guaranteed right to privacy in the Constitution.”

    There is no Constitution, or shouldn’t be. The Constitution grants rights the Bible prohibits, i.e. due process of law, the freedom to be secure in one’s secular possessions, the ‘freedom’ for Muslims and vegetarians not to be tortured, the “freedom” to express thoughts contrary to the strict word of Christ, the ‘right’ of women to vote, and the “freedom” to NOT be compelled toward the only true religion – Christianity.

    The Frenchified Perverts Jefferson, Franklin, and Lafayette created the Constitution so that Christianity would gradualy be destroyed. Even the Second Amendment’s first half is completely useless, and allows the Supreme Court to steal our guns so that women can’t resist Hillary Clinton’s evil washing machine body.

    Rick Santorum is absolutely correct. He should be King Brownback’s highest noble. Only with his assistance can we restore divine rights and divinity to this nation.

    Comment by bobcorker — February 4, 2008 @ 7:09 pm | Reply

  12. “Rick Santorum is absolutely correct. He should be King Brownback’s highest noble. Only with his assistance can we restore divine rights and divinity to this nation.”
    Over my dead body

    In b4 that can be arranged.

    Comment by Elephant Bones — February 4, 2008 @ 7:16 pm | Reply

  13. “You also have no protected or special right to sodomize others in your den of sin. Make no mistake about it, fornicators, your days are numbered.”

    So they’ll start with you, right?

    “the “freedom” to express thoughts contrary to the strict word of Christ,”

    I love how Jesus was about peace, love, kindness, and revolution, yet dillholes like 2-inch Corker think Jesus was all about oppression and rigidity.

    Wow, do you idiots not read the Bible?

    Comment by Dio Brando — February 4, 2008 @ 7:57 pm | Reply

  14. Hey bobby, if you do not agree with the Bill of Rights, maybe you should GTFO amerika.

    in b4 I’m a bitch

    Comment by The Nobody — February 4, 2008 @ 8:02 pm | Reply

  15. Hey Nobody, both of America’s parties are Right Wing on everything except the Culture War. There is no country more devoted to Christianity and conservatism than America. On the other hand, Scandinavia and the rest of the Eurocommies run liberal utopias that you would be proud of. Shouldn’t you move to your Bolshevist country, already?

    “Wow, do you idiots not read the Bible?”

    “I come not to bring peace, but a sword” “Anyone who does not hate their neighbor shall not enter the kingdom of heaven”

    Considering you are not a Christian, ChanFag, you have no right to be telling other Christians about the Bible.

    Comment by bobcorker — February 4, 2008 @ 8:12 pm | Reply

  16. “Anyone who does not hate their neighbor shall not enter the kingdom of heaven”

    Where the hell did that come from, you show me a verse in the bible that says that and I’ll kiss your ass for the rest of your life.

    But, being a liar and all, of course you can’t find one.

    Comment by Arn — February 4, 2008 @ 8:21 pm | Reply

  17. ‘Neighbor’ can also be interpreted as ‘family’, among other things.

    Again, atheist scum should not be telling Christians what their Bible says.

    Comment by bobcorker — February 4, 2008 @ 8:23 pm | Reply

  18. “There is no country more devoted to Christianity and conservatism than America.”

    And there are countries in the middle east ran by people who are devoted to Islam and conservatism. Honestly, other than a few chapters in a book, language, and ethnicity, there is no difference between you. You want the infidels dead, they want the infidels dead. You hate women, they hate women. They enjoy blowing up the enemy, you enjoy blowing up the enemy.

    “Considering you are not a Christian, ChanFag, you have no right to be telling other Christians about the Bible.”

    Nice remark, you…you…DOUBLE FAGGOT.

    Also, I read through your book, and after reading the book before(Torah) and book after(Koran), I can honestly say they all preach peace and inner purity. Of course, you didn’t respond to my point about Jesus desiring peace, love, and revolution, which means you glossed over the Jesus bits and skipped to everything on damnation.

    Idiot.

    Comment by Dio Brando — February 4, 2008 @ 10:27 pm | Reply

  19. “And there are countries in the middle east ran by people who are devoted to Islam and conservatism.”

    Hardly. Prove to me that Islam is capitalist. I hardly see ANY businesses (other than their phony religion) do well, while their government tightly regulates all products. In addition, they cast the first stone (against America’s allies), and oppress their citizens through the lies of Islam to no end. Unlike Christianity, a nation under Islam would never seek peace. Without Christian America, where do you think that Japan and South Korea would be? Chile and Panama? Kuwait, Greece, Turkey? Anyone see Communism and/or dictatorships stopped by America? On the other hand, anyone see what Islam has done for the world? Hmm?

    “Also, I read through your book, and after reading the book before(Torah) and book after(Koran), I can honestly say they all preach peace and inner purity. Of course, you didn’t respond to my point about Jesus desiring peace, love, and revolution, which means you glossed over the Jesus bits and skipped to everything on damnation.”

    1. No, you didn’t. You got your ideas from the Rational Response Squad. I will admit that the Christians that waste time on Youtube are a bit crazy in the head, but the atheists take useless debate to a ridiculous level.
    2. We are not talking about what to do with oneself. This is a political thread, and Jesus did not mean for His teachings to apply to government and laws, for they were too great for government and laws. Instead, they are how we should live our life. Christians should always look after one another and help the lost, but we should not show mercy to those that ferociously oppose us. The LORD expressed His commands by demanding government. Jesus in no way sought to speak of government, but rather of the self. We are expected to give money to the well-meaning poor (NOT welfare queens) on our own will, not by being forced through government. Islam does not do such a thing.

    Government’s role is, obviously, to protect us, and putting cameras in public places (not private places) is useful for security. Fighting terrorism is also necessary and practical for government to do. But, other than those, government should spread and enforce Christianity. Christ laid down creeds for us to follow our lives. Atheists such as Margaret Sanger based their entire lives on self-fulfillment and suffering of others for the heck of it, and such must be supressed. Christ would not like atheism, I guarantee it.

    3. Matthew 13:41-42, 50; 10:33
    Mark 6:11; 8:38; 16:16
    Luke 11:23; 12:46-47
    John 14:6; 12:48; 15:22 (this one is very important for you, Mr. Brando); 14:21

    Since you feel that everything other than the Gospels is garbage, there is no reason to cite from said passages.

    Christ encouraged tolerance towards the general population, but not those that disobey God’s laws and refuse to acknowledge His grace.

    Atheist garbage incoming, or will the atheists remain wise and shut up?

    Comment by bobcorker — February 5, 2008 @ 11:36 pm | Reply

  20. You people are aware that Rick Santorum was caught soliciting gay sex, right? The homosexual community finds it the greatest joke on the Religious Right that they’ve ever heard, and a particular disgusting mix of bodily fluids (which fluids are better left to the imagination) is now referred to by them as “santorum.”

    Don’t use him as an example of “good judgment,” or you only make yourselves look ridiculous. Do more research before posting please.

    Comment by L — February 6, 2008 @ 11:45 am | Reply

  21. What is this freedom your professors and doctors are so adamant about? The freedom to molest students and patients without their families being able to utter any protest? Is this what privacy is all about? Democracy is based on transparency. The word idiot is cognate with the Greek for privacy. Your voter registration is public so labor can prevent a Republican from getting a union job. Your property deed is public so you can be held accountable. Swiss Bank privacy only was created during the nazi era.

    Comment by goat man — February 15, 2008 @ 1:32 pm | Reply

  22. Mike Huckabee is probably the closest candidate to true conservatism in the race and he expected to be taking up the rear unless good Christians pray and vote fervently.

    Does this mean that, if Huckabee does not become the front-runner, we can reasonably infer that good Christians did not pray and vote fervently?

    Comment by Phil — February 15, 2008 @ 9:37 pm | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: