Blogs 4 Brownback

February 4, 2008

Abercrombie & Fitch = Obscenity

Filed under: Defending America,Family Values,Perverts,Popular Culture — Psycheout @ 9:03 am
Tags:

Abercrombie ObscenityJust another example of liberal excesses gone horribly wrong. Fortunately the police were on the case. Once again the perverts and leftists thumbed their nose at community standards backed up by the law and lost. Ha ha, perverts!

Police, saying they were responding to citizen complaints, carted away two large promotional photographs from the Abercrombie & Fitch store in Lynnhaven Mall on Saturday and cited the manager on obscenity charges.

They had their chance to comply with basic decency but couldn’t resist tickling the jaded senses of a youth culture out of control and out of the bounds of civilized society.

Adam Bernstein, a police spokesman, said the seizure and the issuance of the summons came only after store management had not heeded warnings to remove the images.

You can see one of the images above that led to this police action. It’s pretty clear that there was little other choice but to act in the best interest of children and juveniles in the community. What else could one do?

Bernstein confirmed that one depicts three shirtless young men from the back, walking through a field. The man in the lead appears to be about to pull up his jeans, which have slipped down enough to reveal his upper buttocks.

But that’s not all. There was even more filth that needed to be torn down to protect the youth from blatant pornography pushed by Pervercrombie & Bitch.

The other image is of a woman who is topless and whose “breast is displayed with her hand covering just the nipple portion,” Bernstein said. “You could still pretty much see the rest of the breast.”

Janet Jackson's FunbagsWhen Janet Jackson ripped off her top to reveal her “funbags” on national tv, the network had to pay a rather large fine. A&F should face the same, and should be rightfully tarred and feathered and run out of town on a rail.

It’s for the children and the survival of our moral nation. What say you?

— Psycheout

21 Comments »

  1. We are all made in God’s image.
    Thus we have penises.
    So God has a penis as well.

    What use has a divine penis if he does not use it?

    Comment by Jim — February 4, 2008 @ 10:34 am | Reply

  2. (unless there is a goddess, or it is used for urinating only)

    Comment by Jim — February 4, 2008 @ 10:35 am | Reply

  3. OH YES we have to BURN away this filth from our society and we would otherwise BURN in the fires of HELL if we were not saved by JESUS.

    We need to light a fire under these people and get them moving in the right direction. We need to have them stack up copies of their perverted catalogs and posters and possibly some of the worst offenders and RID the Earth of their filth one and for all.

    Comment by Marty McPain — February 4, 2008 @ 11:58 am | Reply

  4. Heh, Marty reminds me of the First Crusade. “To the holy land!! But let’s stop and kill a whole bunch of Jews first!!” History does indeed repeat itself.

    Comment by Adam Nelson — February 4, 2008 @ 12:32 pm | Reply

  5. This blog is absolute filth. Let’s clean it up!
    This message is brought to you by Dial soap.

    Comment by The Nobody — February 4, 2008 @ 1:04 pm | Reply

  6. What use has a divine penis if he does not use it?

    Comment by Jim — February 4, 2008 @ 10:34 am

    HAHAHA, OH WOW!

    Comment by TrogdortheEnlightened — February 4, 2008 @ 1:08 pm | Reply

  7. We’re discussing cocks, care to join us?

    Comment by Elephant Bones — February 4, 2008 @ 1:50 pm | Reply

  8. since those men are freakin GORGEOUS (from the back at least – I get the feeling that if they turned around they’d be hairless and kinda pre-pubescent looking), i’m only disappointed i cannot see more of them.

    Comment by kat — February 4, 2008 @ 3:17 pm | Reply

  9. @ The Nobody
    Not even dial soap can clean up this god-forsaken mess.

    Comment by Anonymous — February 4, 2008 @ 4:10 pm | Reply

  10. What about the bare arse of the angel in those retarded Faithmouse comics that you faggots post?

    Comment by Anonymous — February 4, 2008 @ 4:15 pm | Reply

  11. “Not even dial soap can clean up this god-forsaken mess.”
    How about we kill it with fire?

    Comment by Elephant Bones — February 4, 2008 @ 7:13 pm | Reply

  12. Oh yes, it should be a horrible crime for any child to learn that humans have bodies, and that mommy has boobs. Wow, because only a blind idiot could possibly not realize that mommy has a big squishy chest, and daddy is big and has broad shoulders.

    Oh hey, what was that argument against forcing women to wear burqas again?

    Comment by Dio Brando — February 4, 2008 @ 7:49 pm | Reply

  13. @EB
    Or we could Gigaload the hell out of this site. But fire works, too.

    Comment by The Nobody — February 4, 2008 @ 8:03 pm | Reply

  14. I’ll laugh for at least a day when we finally get sick of this, gigaload this place to death, and then hack it and post gay porn everywhere, after giving out the IPs and addresses of Corktard and McSlappin Mckids.

    Comment by Dio Brando — February 4, 2008 @ 10:21 pm | Reply

  15. “Or we could Gigaload the hell out of this site. But fire works, too.”
    That wouldn’t work. We’d just be attacking the WordPress servers, not this specific site. We’d need hax

    Comment by Elephant Bones — February 4, 2008 @ 10:40 pm | Reply

  16. True, we like wordpress. But a hax is fine, too.

    Comment by Dio Brando — February 4, 2008 @ 10:45 pm | Reply

  17. If that’s the case, we all need to lurk moar. Much moar.

    Comment by The Nobody — February 5, 2008 @ 3:41 pm | Reply

  18. The man who can not be banned salutes you all

    Comment by MoxoM — February 5, 2008 @ 5:06 pm | Reply

  19. We are all made in God’s image.
    Thus we have penises.
    So God has a penis as well.

    What use has a divine penis if he does not use it?

    Comment by Jim

    The people that run this chat are also impotent.
    No wonder that they think they are divine messengers.

    Comment by y7699 — February 6, 2008 @ 11:03 am | Reply

  20. Men without shirts? Not objectionable. Men go without shirts when they swim on our public beaches, after all.

    Woman revealing her breasts for purposes other than feeding an infant? Objectionable. The breasts are highly eroticized organs, and should remain covered in public whenever possible to avoid accidentally tempting others.

    (Also, as regards public breastfeeding, it would be advisable for women to use one of the handy covers designed for such a purpose, which are designed with both modesty and the child’s comfort in mind.

    Comment by L — February 6, 2008 @ 11:41 am | Reply

  21. Hahahahaha. Pervercrombie and Bitch? You should be writing for The Onion, not this fascist blog. Hi-larious.

    As for Janet, her “bags” are clearly far from “fun”, so I’d appreciate more accurate messaging in the future.

    If you’ll excuse me, I’m due at a book-burning rally…

    Comment by mtbrooks — February 6, 2008 @ 4:38 pm | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: