Blogs 4 Brownback

January 10, 2008

South Carolina Debate

Filed under: Debate,Republicans — Psycheout @ 4:38 pm
Tags: ,

DebateAt 9pm EST there will be a debate between the GOP candidates in South Carolina, broadcast on Fox News Channel and moderated by the always brilliant Brit Hume.

Since there is no frontrunner at this stage in the race and the Michigan and South Carolina primaries are just around the corner, expect a knock down bare knuckle fight.

Romney has yet to win.  McCain may do well in Michigan and it looks like it’s between Huckabee and McCain in South Carolina.  Hold onto your hats!

Duncan Hunter will not be participating.

The debate will be streamed online at foxnews.com.

— Psycheout

16 Comments »

  1. McCain fathered an illegetimate black child, according to the SCers, so there’s no way he’ll win. Yay Huck!

    Comment by bobcorker — January 10, 2008 @ 5:25 pm | Reply

  2. [Ed Note: Watch your potty language. Eat a bar of soap.]

    Comment by Captain Planet — January 9, 2008 @ 4:47 pm

    Why, because he is right?

    Where did all the good commenters go? Why are we left with these petty trolls?

    Why should I take this blog seriously? It’s made by a bunch of 4chan /b/rothers who like to stir [choclit] up. Hey look, I censored myself so Psycrotch didn’t have to practice his Nazi ways. Woot.

    If you can’t comprehend the elegance of my wonderful metaphor, that’s your own problem.

    Spark up another jazz cigarette, stoner boy.

    Comment by Psycheout — January 7, 2008 @ 9:40 pm

    Why don’t you kill yourself with a cross, Psycur?

    Comment by The Nobody — January 10, 2008 @ 5:46 pm | Reply

  3. I can feel the love in this thread

    Comment by Elephant Bones — January 10, 2008 @ 7:14 pm | Reply

  4. Some say that Fred! won the debate. He did not. I think Huck took it away.

    Even if Fred! won, he won’t win.

    Comment by Psycheout — January 10, 2008 @ 9:40 pm | Reply

  5. Gotta love politics.

    Comment by ChenZhen — January 11, 2008 @ 12:21 am | Reply

  6. Charasmatic, well-liked, Handsome, came from humble beginnings, and is bringing change. Who is this? Barack Obama or the Anti-Christ? Both I say they are the same! AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

    Comment by Harry Potter — January 11, 2008 @ 9:12 am | Reply

  7. “Charasmatic, well-liked, Handsome, came from humble beginnings, and is bringing change. Who is this? Barack Obama or the Anti-Christ?”
    Kinda sounds like the original Christ to me.

    Comment by Elephant Bones — January 11, 2008 @ 9:15 am | Reply

  8. Christ was described as handsome or well-liked.

    Comment by Harry Potter — January 11, 2008 @ 9:18 am | Reply

  9. And given how popular he is even now, I’d say he was charismatic.

    Comment by Elephant Bones — January 11, 2008 @ 9:29 am | Reply

  10. I meant not described as handsome or well-liked. Also, He is popular in death not life…kind of late.

    Comment by Harry Potter — January 11, 2008 @ 9:30 am | Reply

  11. He had a following of hundreds of disciples. If that’s not charisma, I don’t know what is.

    Comment by Elephant Bones — January 11, 2008 @ 9:36 am | Reply

  12. I heard Mike Huckabee wants Stephen Colbert to be his running mate. First Chuck Norris, and now Colbert? This guy knows how to appeal to the internets.

    Comment by TrogdortheEnlightened — January 11, 2008 @ 12:06 pm | Reply

  13. Most people hated him. Just because you have a “following” does not mean you are Charasmatic,

    Comment by Harry Potter — January 11, 2008 @ 12:31 pm | Reply

  14. Harry Potter thinks Obama is the Anti-Christ. People thought Reagan was the antichrist too, in fact enough of them thought so that it made the news and was printed in hundreds of magazines and religious propaganda flyers. The same goes for the Pope, even suggesting that the letters on his sash were roman numerals equalling the number of the beast.
    There have been lots of people that were thought to be the antichrist by certain groups of people. And in each case it all started with just one little religious fanatic that thought he saw the signs of the antichrist in someone and spread it around.

    Comment by Arn — January 11, 2008 @ 12:40 pm | Reply

  15. Well obviously you are the “religious fanatic”, because I was ignorant to these “rumors.” And only a true nutter would know this crap. I was merely expressing my own dissatisfaction with obama by saying rash things, which in this country is legal.

    Comment by Harry Potter — January 13, 2008 @ 9:56 pm | Reply

  16. “Just because you have a “following” does not mean you are Charasmatic”
    Actually, that’s exactly what it means.
    Charisma (n.) – a personal magic of leadership arousing special popular loyalty or enthusiasm for a public figure.

    Yeah, you can say rash things, but they cannot be slanderous. And most would rather they not be stupid.

    Comment by Elephant Bones — January 14, 2008 @ 12:55 am | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: