Blogs 4 Brownback

December 28, 2007

Freaky Ford Funds Sex Change Operations

Filed under: Christianity,Perverts — Psycheout @ 1:27 pm
Tags: , ,

TransgenderYet another reason to boycott Ford. Not only do they love homosexuals and do their part to promote the homo agenda, they also happily fund operations to change men into women! This is an abomination!

Ford offers medical benefits to help pay expenses of those who choose to undergo sex change operations. Ford pays for mental health counseling, hormone therapy, medical visits, and short-term disability after surgical procedures for employees who desire to change their sex.

Deuteronomy 22:5 clearly states “The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man, neither shall a man put on a woman’s garment: for all that do so are abomination unto the LORD thy God.

And Ford supports more than just its perverted workers slipping on a frilly dress; Ford actually pays for their bodily disfigurement so that they appear to be of the opposite sex. This is sick and wrong. And if you buy a Ford, you are supporting this practice and funding sex changes.

Update: Words of wisdom:

If wearing clothes from a person of the opposite sex is considered an abomination in the eyes of God – can you imagine what God must think about someone trying to undergo a full sex change operation in order to try and completely change the gender they were born with?

It certainly would not be pleasing in the eyes of the Lord.

— Psycheout

21 Comments »

  1. agreed, anon

    Comment by Elephant Bones — December 28, 2007 @ 3:44 pm | Reply

  2. Transsexuals should all be shot. Aside from Mormons and their magical underwear, transsexuals are the greatest threat to America the MSM isn’t even aware about.

    Comment by bobcorker — December 28, 2007 @ 5:02 pm | Reply

  3. So Deuterotomy says women shall not wear that which pertaineth to a man…does that mean you are against women wearing pants? What about a woman who wears her husband’s dress shirt untucked?

    Comment by John — December 28, 2007 @ 7:32 pm | Reply

  4. Comment by John — December 28, 2007 @ 7:32 pm

    okay, you need to be beaten. with a willow switch.
    I have to look up the number of times proscribed in Deut, but you had better bend over and like it!

    of course women should not wear that which pertainith to the man…..are you insane?

    Comment by Marty McPain — December 28, 2007 @ 8:00 pm | Reply

  5. Women absolutely should not wear pants. They should be doubly veiled and wear a cordet, as well as have their bosoms strapped down. Men should wear business suits.

    Comment by Bob_Corker — December 28, 2007 @ 8:15 pm | Reply

  6. No pants allowed? I like the way Bob thinks!

    Comment by Elephant Bones — December 28, 2007 @ 9:27 pm | Reply

  7. “No pants allowed? I like the way Bob thinks”

    No, you big-footed elephantitis sufferer. I mean that men should not be exposed to the vileness inherent in women’s anatomy. Pants tend to curve so you see an opening, and make fornication easier for rapists and creepy interns. Thus, pants on women cause nothing but trouble. The cordet, as I suggested, is much better.

    Comment by Bob_Corker — December 28, 2007 @ 9:32 pm | Reply

  8. I was just treating your comment with the respect it deserved

    Comment by Elephant Bones — December 28, 2007 @ 11:30 pm | Reply

  9. Bob is a pervert as usual.

    Comment by MoxoM — December 29, 2007 @ 5:35 am | Reply

  10. It’s obvious that KKKorkkker, BJ, McPain, Sisyphus and Psykkkeout all love their sex changes.

    Queer Eye For The Brownback Guys.

    Comment by SisyphusLicksPsycheoutsPantyParts — January 1, 2008 @ 8:39 pm | Reply

  11. ….and Bob is a perv. Not only gay, but likely a pedophile.

    Comment by SisyphusLicksPsycheoutsPantyParts — January 1, 2008 @ 8:41 pm | Reply

  12. Uh oh, guess I’m going to Hell for wearing men’s T-shirts. And–oh, the horror! trousers as well!

    “No, you big-footed elephantitis sufferer. I mean that men should not be exposed to the vileness inherent in women’s anatomy. Pants tend to curve so you see an opening, and make fornication easier for rapists and creepy interns. Thus, pants on women cause nothing but trouble.”

    Actually, pants make it more difficult for a woman to be raped, since they can’t be pulled away from the nether regions nearly as easily as a skirt, especially if she’s wearing a belt. And if a “cordet” is so effective, why have I never heard of it? Is that another name for a chastity belt?

    You also clearly are not familiar with the loose style pants that are currently fashionable. Those horrible skin-tight pants that leave little to the imagination and only fit for a few weeks before they shrink to an unwearable size are, thankfully, no longer in vogue.

    Comment by L — January 1, 2008 @ 10:45 pm | Reply

  13. Forgot to mention one more thing. A woman’s anatomy is not that different from a man’s–the only organs that are different are those required for reproduction. Everything else is exactly the same. If a woman’s anatomy is “vile,” then a man’s anatomy is equally vile. This is clearly bunkum, because both men and women were made in the image and likeness of God.

    Eve was not made from Adam’s head, that she should be superior to him. Nor was she made from his feet, that she should be inferior. She was made from his rib, midway down his body, because the two sexes are meant to be equal in rights and dignity.

    Comment by L — January 1, 2008 @ 10:48 pm | Reply

  14. Well stated L. These Conservotards are nothing but Sexist bigots.

    Comment by SisyphusLicksPsycheoutsPantyParts — January 1, 2008 @ 11:21 pm | Reply

  15. So Psykkkeout is a trannie….why am I not suprized?

    Comment by Spacebrother — January 2, 2008 @ 11:24 am | Reply

  16. I see mcpainful is trying to tell someone to bend over and like it. Little faggot just never gives up does he?

    Comment by Arn — January 2, 2008 @ 11:58 am | Reply

  17. I think I understand why they call him McPain. It must have something to do with his strap on dildo.

    Hahahahaha.

    Comment by Spacebrother — January 2, 2008 @ 12:34 pm | Reply

  18. Guess what? Ford can do whatever the hell they want with their money and have no reason whatsoever to do what your fairy tale book says…

    Comment by jm4847 — January 3, 2008 @ 5:19 pm | Reply

  19. “If a woman’s anatomy is ‘vile,’ then a man’s anatomy is equally vile. This is clearly bunkum, because both men and women were made in the image and likeness of God.”

    Exactly. If you’re going to support the notion that God created all on Earth, why would you call one of his most important creations such a horrible thing? I don’t think he’d appreciate that.

    Comment by Brian-sama — January 8, 2008 @ 3:33 pm | Reply

  20. This site is rubbish.You’re all backwater yokles.Keep praying to your pretend god…theres something wrong with America.

    Comment by madonna — May 19, 2008 @ 5:17 am | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: