Blogs 4 Brownback

November 27, 2007

Kill the Barbarians

Deady BearThese are our enemies:

UK Prime Minister Gordon Brown said Tuesday that officials were working to secure the early release of a British teacher who faces being whipped in Sudan after she allowed her class to name a teddy bear “Mohammed.”

Gillian Gibbons, 54, was arrested Sunday after she asked her class of seven-year-olds to come up with a name for the toy as part of a school project, her head teacher told CNN.

Robert Boulos, the head of Unity High School in the capital Khartoum, said naming the teddy bear was “a totally innocent mistake” and that Gibbons had never intended to cause offense.

He said Gibbons had asked the children to pick their favorite name for the new class mascot, which she was using to aid lessons about animals and their habitats.

Classmates took turns taking the teddy bear home with them, accompanied by a diary with the bear’s name written in the front of it, Boulos said.

“All this is a very sensitive area. I asked her (Gibbons) why she had done it and she said she didn’t chose the name, the children did,” Boulos told CNN.

British Prime Minister Gordon Brown said Tuesday he was “very sorry” about Gibbons’ arrest and that the British embassy in Khartoum was “giving all appropriate consular assistance to her.”

He said all efforts were being taken to ensure her early release and that government officials were in touch with the teacher’s family in the northern British city of Liverpool.

The school teacher has been accused of blasphemy and is being held by police in Khartoum, Kirsty Saunders, British Foreign Office spokeswoman told CNN.

Although there is no ban in the Koran on images of Allah or the Prophet Mohammed, likenesses are considered highly offensive by Muslims.

Parents of students at the school informed the authorities and Gibbons was taken into custody Sunday, Saunders said.

These lunatics want to conquer the world. They want to enslave us all, kill our children for naming their teddy bears the wrong things, and force us to burn our crucifixes and Bibles on the altar of Idolatry. It is the sacred duty of every Christian and of every Republican American patriot to carry the fight for freedom, liberty, Christianity, and American ideals to such dens of vipers.

The moonbats may not like to hear it. They’d much rather surrender to such people than kill them. But the fact remains, our way is the only true way of freedom. Our path is the path of Truth and Virtue. Theirs is the way of lies, sin, and demonism. Islam, like its kindred ideology, Marxism and the pseudo-sciences of Copernicanism and Darwinism, is founded on lies and distortions and on demonization of those who present the Truth.

We are the real Americans, and the most highly spiritually advanced humans. Those other people are not, but it is our duty to make them so, by whatever means God provides for us in His Infinite Wisdom. If the cleansing power of the Atom must be unleashed by the British government to teach Sudan not to whip British citizens for no crime other than naming a teddy bear after some false prophet who died 1500 years ago, so be it. We should all stand behind our noble British allies, and toss in a nuke or two of our own if it becomes necessary.

58 Comments »

  1. Hey… found your blog through wordpress and wanted to let you know how much I like it!! Keep up the good work and check out my blog when you have a chance: http://www.rpigate.wordpress.com

    John Pigate

    Comment by rpigate — November 27, 2007 @ 12:08 pm | Reply

  2. There is nothing worse than people who use religion and their gods to hide behind and use for an excuse for their hate.

    Comment by larry — November 27, 2007 @ 12:23 pm | Reply

  3. This is less about Islamic teachings and more about the rabid and savage nature of the sub-Saharan peoples. It’s a culture-based perversion of a religion.

    Comment by jonolan — November 27, 2007 @ 12:27 pm | Reply

  4. “This is less about Islamic teachings and more about the rabid and savage nature of the sub-Saharan peoples. It’s a culture-based perversion of a religion.”

    Whatever. You say tomahtoh, I say tomato.

    Comment by Sisyphus — November 27, 2007 @ 12:31 pm | Reply

  5. All I was saying that – this time – Islam is not to blame. The Sudanese culture is. Sub-Saharan nations have found a way to pervert almost everything they’ve gotten their hands on into some form or excuse for brutal savagery. Islamists may well want to conquer the world, but even they would have little use for the sub-Saharan peoples except for as very expendable shock troops.

    Comment by jonolan — November 27, 2007 @ 12:42 pm | Reply

  6. “Islamists may well want to conquer the world, but even they would have little use for the sub-Saharan peoples except for as very expendable shock troops.”

    So, are we blaming Islamism, or black people? I think I’m saying the former, while you’re saying the latter. Correct me if I’m wrong, though, I’m a little tired today and may not be thinking clearly.

    Comment by Sisyphus — November 27, 2007 @ 12:52 pm | Reply

  7. I’m blaming the culture that has arisen in sub-Saharan Africa – in places like Sudan, The Congo and Darfur. Yes the populations are primarily Black, so I guess you can say I’m blaming Black people. I don’t think of that way though.

    Comment by jonolan — November 27, 2007 @ 12:57 pm | Reply

  8. “If the cleansing power of the Atom must be unleashed by the British government to teach Sudan not to whip British citizens for no crime other than naming a teddy bear after some false prophet who died 1500 years ago, so be it. We should all stand behind our noble British allies, and toss in a nuke or two of our own if it becomes necessary.”

    Why is it that your solution to everything is nuclear weopons? Everyone knows that the use of nuclear weopons would lead to the end of modern civilization and possibly to the end of life on earth, there is no such thing as a limited nuclear war. Talk like that shows definate signs of insanity.

    Comment by Arn — November 27, 2007 @ 1:05 pm | Reply

  9. You want to nuke them for arresting an innocent teacher, but the nukes would kill her too, along with all the other innocent people in the area. Care to point out the logic in such an idiotic idea?

    Comment by Arn — November 27, 2007 @ 1:10 pm | Reply

  10. [ed note:] you spelled definite wrong you dolt.
    there, now you don’t have to do it.

    Comment by Arn — November 27, 2007 @ 1:13 pm | Reply

  11. Sisyphus,

    There’s no need to nuke Sudan. If the West decided they were unsalvageable and stopped funding aid to them, they’d collapse and blow away in a few decades at most.

    Comment by jonolan — November 27, 2007 @ 1:39 pm | Reply

  12. We are the real Americans (nope, those were called “Indians”, you are merely an offspring of European immigrants), and the most highly spiritually advanced humans (yep, wanting to nuke people makes you very spiritual, lolol)
    (cool that a Subhuman like YOU claims that he is spiritual in the first place)

    Comment by Moxom — November 27, 2007 @ 1:40 pm | Reply

  13. although I give you one point:

    Whipping someone who called his teddy Mohammed is just cruel and braindead.
    But so is every “vengeance” in the name of any kind of deity.

    Comment by Moxom — November 27, 2007 @ 1:44 pm | Reply

  14. Lickyphus has proved once again that he has the intellect of a wet, juicy, post bean burrito bowl movement.

    Comment by Spacebrother — November 27, 2007 @ 2:24 pm | Reply

  15. spacebrother: didn’t you mean bowel movement?

    Comment by Arn — November 27, 2007 @ 2:40 pm | Reply

  16. The Sudanese government has committed horrid atrocities against the black Christians that populate the area. I think that we need to invade the country, kill its leaders, and ensure Christianity conversion goes smoothly. It’s the least we can do for those poor suffering people.

    Comment by Bob_Corker — November 27, 2007 @ 3:11 pm | Reply

  17. spacebrother: didn’t you mean bowel movement?

    Comment by Arn — November 27, 2007 @ 2:40 pm

    yes I did.

    Comment by Spacebrother — November 27, 2007 @ 3:19 pm | Reply

  18. Every time Spacebrother comments, it’s as if he meant to make a bowel movement.

    Comment by Psycheout — November 27, 2007 @ 3:50 pm | Reply

  19. so what psycheout,, your words are bowel movements.

    Comment by Arn — November 27, 2007 @ 3:58 pm | Reply

  20. Sisyphus and Bob Corker; I think you have put the finger on what would Jesus do in this situation. This is exactly the kind of situation Jesus was talking about with the parable of the good Samaritan. These people are in distress in Sudan and it is our Christian duty to help them. What ever it takes. No option is unthinkable when helping our neighbors.

    Comment by BJ Tabor — November 27, 2007 @ 4:52 pm | Reply

  21. ok, moving away from the subject of bowels movements…ಠ_ಠ
    having researched the sudanese conflict extensively, i can see how an issue like this could occur. the entire place is a (rhymes with mitt)hole, the south is the victim of genocide. a survivor of the civil war spoke at my school. the horrors he’s survived are unimaginable (his name is Jon Bul Dau, and he wrote a memoir about his experiences, titled God Grew Tired of Us). There are international laws for dealing with genocide. we could take these steps, rather than jump into a nuclear holocaust.
    ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ
    ^my shock at how messed up that country is at the moment. i really do pity those people.

    Comment by Elephant Bones — November 27, 2007 @ 5:10 pm | Reply

  22. “You want to nuke them for arresting an innocent teacher, but the nukes would kill her too, along with all the other innocent people in the area. Care to point out the logic in such an idiotic idea?”

    We’ll rescue our people from that cesspool before we destroy it, of course. Just like you’d fish a $100 bill out of the toilet before you flushed it.

    “Sisyphus and Bob Corker; I think you have put the finger on what would Jesus do in this situation. This is exactly the kind of situation Jesus was talking about with the parable of the good Samaritan. These people are in distress in Sudan and it is our Christian duty to help them. What ever it takes. No option is unthinkable when helping our neighbors.”

    Exactly!

    Comment by Sisyphus — November 27, 2007 @ 5:23 pm | Reply

  23. This is exactly the kind of situation Jesus was talking about with the parable of the good Samaritan.

    By BJ Hellboy

    If it was up to you BJ you would have let the Samaritan DIE cause he would be a MINORITY.

    Comment by Moxom — November 27, 2007 @ 5:31 pm | Reply

  24. Just like you’d fish a $100 bill out of the toilet before you flushed it.

    By 666Siphus

    That’s just disgusting to hear that you wipe your behind with Dollar notes, 666Siphus…..try toilet paper instead.

    Comment by Moxom — November 27, 2007 @ 5:35 pm | Reply

  25. “We’ll rescue our people from that cesspool before we destroy it, of course”

    Uh, dumba** , you are still using nukes, did you not understand what I said? you use nukes you run the risk of killing everyone, there is no such thing as a limited nuclear war, how many times do you need to be told that before it sinks into that tiny little brain of yours. Even suggesting nukes for anything is insane, and you idiots call it the answer to everything,, who is really in favor of genocide here? The answer is: you stupid heathens covering yourselves with a false cloak of christianity that even the dimmest of dimwits could see through. Not a one of you is a real christian and every one of you are liars. And you really think you have the brains to successfully argue any point? Not hardly.

    Comment by Arn — November 27, 2007 @ 6:50 pm | Reply

  26. Arn, you made me realize a few things:
    These guys are so in love with nuclear weapons, I’m sure they’d petition to allow Man/Bomb marriages. The contradiction is that the nuclear bombs are the result of (here’s the real kicker) SCIENCE. Yes, that evil subject guided by Baphomet himself, produced the false idols they worship every chance they get. Bible lovers, my a$$.
    I don’t know why they call themselves conservatives. Conservatives, by definition, resist change. Yet they’re constantly contradicting themselves.
    Using more Satanic tools such as arithmetic and common sense, it’s plain to see that something doesn’t add up.

    Comment by Elephant Bones — November 27, 2007 @ 6:58 pm | Reply

  27. These folks ain’t conservatives. These people are conservative SS.
    Have fun deleting this, as much as I have fun writing this GestapoSSyphus.

    Comment by Moxom — November 27, 2007 @ 7:03 pm | Reply

  28. Godwin’s law

    Comment by Elephant Bones — November 27, 2007 @ 7:07 pm | Reply

  29. You’re barking up the wrong tree in #26, moonbat. Marriage is a union between one man and one woman. It’s you leftist treefrogs who want to redefine marriage, not us.

    Comment by Psycheout — November 27, 2007 @ 7:09 pm | Reply

  30. I like how Arn used the word ‘you’ 11 times in his last post, and ‘yours’ once.

    What we have clearly observed is that Islam kills people in ‘secular’ life (well, the parts secularists share our experiences in) as well as spiritual life. Countries that worship Allah always, with the possible exception of Turkey, plummet into civil wars, external wars, and “How far can I walk on my bare feet and how often can I kiss dirt” wars, and Turkey isn’t exactly our ally anymore. The fact that the leftists want to attack us Christians rather than the genocidial Islamists saddens me. Empiricism should always take precedence over idiotic, unjustified assertions made by the Left and Libermarxians, and the Republican Party will continue to stand firm against this horrible religion that has somehow managed to escape the ‘pagan’ label.

    Comment by Bob_Corker — November 27, 2007 @ 7:53 pm | Reply

  31. “The fact that the leftists want to attack us Christians rather than the genocidial Islamists saddens me.”

    What you need to do is quit calling yourself a Christian. You are not a Christian. And all the yelling and name calling in the world can’t change that. Christians do not act the way you do. You are a sinner of the worst kind, one who uses the bible (without even understanding the bible) as his excuse for being a total obnoxious bore with a severely demented urge to see people die. You are a sick person that needs mental help.
    Reading the bible could do you some good if you had the brains to understand it’s meaning. Every word you say is a lie and you know it.
    So now I suppose you will count how many times I say the word you again as if that has a damn thing to do with anything. You, you, you, are a freaking idiot.

    Comment by Arn — November 27, 2007 @ 9:01 pm | Reply

  32. well, i was gonna reply to corkey, but Arn has said was i wanted to say

    Comment by Elephant Bones — November 27, 2007 @ 10:17 pm | Reply

  33. whoops, typo, meant to say “what i wanted to say”

    Comment by Elephant Bones — November 27, 2007 @ 10:29 pm | Reply

  34. “Arn, you made me realize a few things:
    These guys are so in love with nuclear weapons, I’m sure they’d petition to allow Man/Bomb marriages. The contradiction is that the nuclear bombs are the result of (here’s the real kicker) SCIENCE. Yes, that evil subject guided by Baphomet himself, produced the false idols they worship every chance they get. Bible lovers, my a$$.
    I don’t know why they call themselves conservatives. Conservatives, by definition, resist change. Yet they’re constantly contradicting themselves.
    Using more Satanic tools such as arithmetic and common sense, it’s plain to see that something doesn’t add up.”

    Comment by Elephant Bones — November 27, 2007 @ 6:58 pm

    Nail on the head.

    Comment by Spacebrother — November 28, 2007 @ 10:43 am | Reply

  35. “Sisyphus and Bob Corker; I think you have put the finger on what would Jesus do in this situation.”

    Comment by BJ Buttpirate — November 27, 2007 @ 4:52 pm

    I don’t remember anywhere in the bible where Jesus said pull OR smell my finger……

    Comment by Spacebrother — November 28, 2007 @ 10:46 am | Reply

  36. I mentioned this before and will mention it again here…..

    Jesus is more in line with Liberalism than Conservo-fascism or theocratic fascism.

    Comment by Spacebrother — November 28, 2007 @ 10:49 am | Reply

  37. Jesus was a conservative, Spacebrother. Read your Bible.

    Comment by Sisyphus — November 28, 2007 @ 11:06 am | Reply

  38. “Jesus was a conservative, Spacebrother. Read your Bible.”

    Comment by Sisyphus — November 28, 2007 @ 11:06 am

    Read it many times. Jesus IS (present tense) the ultimate Liberal. Conservo-fascism is a mental disorder.

    Comment by Spacebrother — November 28, 2007 @ 11:17 am | Reply

  39. These guys are so in love with nuclear weapons, I’m sure they’d petition to allow Man/Bomb marriages.

    Unlikely. Personally, I think that nuclear weaponry is the most dangerous, evil thing that mankind has invented, and that every last one of those weapons should be destroyed. They’re not meant to kill armies or politicians — they’re designed with the express purpose of killing civilians.

    Back to the topic at hand, however, I’m extremely disappointed at the extremism that has manifested itself yet again in the Muslim community. I mean really…a teddy bear? I’ve often thought that the vast majority of Muslims are just regular, devout people, not all that dissimilar to us. (After all, Islam and Christianity ARE somewhat related due to being Abrahamic religions.) However, after that Danish cartoon fiasco, and now this teddy bear incident…it is more difficult to empathize. It is one thing to say that a religion’s followers must obey the religion’s tenets. I have no problem with that. However, to say that non-followers MUST obey these same rules, and to threaten them with death when they do not? That is completely beyond the pale. Yes, I am Christian, and one of my religion’s rules is to not take the Lord’s name in vain. However, am I going to demand that non-Christians cease blaspheming? Of course not! I don’t like it — it makes me wince any time I hear it — but if they’re not Christians, then my religion’s rules don’t apply to them. I can either deal with it, or I can shut myself away from the rest of the world so that I don’t have to hear that which might offend me.

    It’s not an easy situation, as I still like (hope?) to think that those Muslims who would have us ALL bend to their rules, are in the loud minority. If they were just talk, it’d be easy to just ignore them. However, they’re not just talk, and something really needs to be done.

    I just don’t know what that is.

    Comment by Lyssie — November 28, 2007 @ 12:55 pm | Reply

  40. Lyssie: What needs to be done is, the people need to take their own country, it’s been done over and over again throughout history, tyrannical governments were toppled by the very people they ruled over, and they didn’t rely on other countries to help them, the people always outnumber the rulers, they just need to find the courage to stand up for themselves. It’s called revolution, and when it’s for the right reasons it’s the right thing to do.
    We don’t have the right to use our men and our weopons to solve what is essentially an internal matter between another government and it’s people.

    Comment by Arn — November 28, 2007 @ 1:07 pm | Reply

  41. But it’s not interal, Arn. Not unless Denmark became a Muslim country when we weren’t watching. Now, don’t get me wrong, I don’t think that the entire Muslim world wants to subdue the rest of us. But do I think that there are SOME very violent and well-armed Muslims who want that very thing? Well yes…we’ve seen it in action.

    Besides…while we sit around and wait for a revolution, how many people (especially women) are suffering and dying because they ran afoul of the religious police? I don’t think military force is necessarily the answer — but is it right of us to just sit on our hands and wait for it to all play out? Besides…for all we know, this revolution you speak of could very well be led by someone who is just as bad, and who is just pretending to represent the people until he gets in power. How many times have we seen revolutions where it’s a case of “meet the new boss, same as the old boss.”?

    Comment by Lyssie — November 28, 2007 @ 1:12 pm | Reply

  42. actually, you do have some good points, (something I rarely if ever say about the other members here) and I have to agree with your quote from The Who, “meet the new boss, same as the old boss” that has happened all too many times in the past.

    Comment by Arn — November 28, 2007 @ 1:21 pm | Reply

  43. “It’s not an easy situation, as I still like (hope?) to think that those Muslims who would have us ALL bend to their rules, are in the loud minority. If they were just talk, it’d be easy to just ignore them. However, they’re not just talk, and something really needs to be done.

    I just don’t know what that is.”

    Comment by Lyssie — November 28, 2007 @ 12:55 pm

    Sad thing is there are plenty of Christains who have the same views as radical muslims in regards too Theocratic Fascism. It’s the “believe as we do or we’ll torture you, beat you, invade your country, fly planes into your buildings, lock you up in Abu Gahraib/Guantonimo, rape you and so on. The reality is all conflict is centered around corporate greed, regardless of how religion is used as a tool to make the masses for submissive.

    I don’t expect anyone with fundimentalist religious beliefs to see the real truth for what it is but, their govt does it and so does ours. Fundimentally religious people are programmed/brainwashed like the cultists they are and it takes serious deprogramming for them to see the light of truth through the fog and haze.

    My Moment of legitemite truth and substance for the day.

    Comment by Spacebrother — November 28, 2007 @ 2:09 pm | Reply

  44. “meet the new boss, same as the old boss.”?

    Comment by Lyssie — November 28, 2007 @ 1:12

    Since you quoted this from The Who’s Quadrophenia albulm, I assume you have heard the rest of the albulm. It seems to be somewhat prophetic, it was done in England over thirty years ago, but if you pay attention to the words of “The Punk Meets The Godfather” it seems almost as if they were describing our country under our own punk and godfather (Bush and Cheney of course)

    Comment by Arn — November 28, 2007 @ 2:32 pm | Reply

  45. Oh hell, forgive me for that last post, wrong albulm, for your quote anyway, the punk and godfather was on quadrophenia, but not the other one, my mind is still playing it over in my head to figure out which one it was, it’ll come to me.

    Comment by Arn — November 28, 2007 @ 2:35 pm | Reply

  46. ahh, it was at the end of “wont get fooled again” on “The kids are allright” and on a few other albulms too.

    Comment by Arn — November 28, 2007 @ 2:39 pm | Reply

  47. If Christianity isn’t conservative, explain why the first ones were. The B.C. Hebrews were conservatives as well. Are you saying that the people that lived in the times recorded in the Bible were wrong about the interpretation of their religion?

    I don’t even know why Spacebrother is arguing that Jesus was a liberal if He Himself is a libertarian. Liberals go for Kookspinach, not Ron Haul. Jesus wasn’t fond of the nobility, since they often disobeyed Him, but He wasn’t fond of nonworking poor, either.

    Comment by Bob_Corker — November 28, 2007 @ 7:13 pm | Reply

  48. Christians were liberal at the start. They began as being an offshoot of Judaism’s, only to secede in order to have their own religion. your mistake is seeing Jesus as the starting point. I’m going to outline the history of all 3 religions being discussed.
    the starting point of our religion really starts with Abraham. not adam, abraham is considered the patriarch. so for judaism, christianity, and islam, we have abraham as a common starting point, ok?
    now we have Abraham’s two children. Ishmael was the child of Hagar, Sarah’s servant, and Abraham. This child was conceived because Sarah had reached menopause. But Sarah became jealous and evicted Hagar and Ishmael. modern day Islam traces its roots back to Ishmael. Christianity and Judaism continue down the line together through Isaac, then Jacob, then Joseph, and so on. We have the Jewish kings Saul, David, and Solomon. fast forward past the prophets, and we get to the dividing line: Jesus.
    Jesus was born some time around the year 3 BC (the roman calendar had a few flaws in it). Commonly believed to have been immaculately conceived and born from Mary, his earthly father Joseph was a descendant of Kind David, making Jesus’ claim as King of the Jews legitimate both spiritually and secularly. His life is, for the most part, a mystery, until we reach his ministry.
    His ministry is fairly well-known by the readers (i hope), and he was crucified on charges of blasphemy, technically for proclaiming himself to be the Messiah. It’s pretty easy to see that the truth was that the Sanhedrin, the Jewish ruling class at the time, saw him as a political enemy, and wanted him out of the picture. after all, Jesus was calling them hypocrites, driving out the moneylenders and pulling followers towards his ideal. so they petitioned the romans to kill him, which they did. fortunately, he proved harder to silence than most martyrs, and came back from the dead 3 days later. he met his apostles, then ascended into heaven.
    Christians and Jews take their separate ways here. The Jews contend that while Jesus was an amazing person, he was not the Messiah. Christians believe Jesus was the messiah, and exalt his name, and all that good stuff.
    now that we’re all on the same page here…
    Jesus’ actions, by any definition, are definitely being liberal. he questioned the status quo, and was consequently shot down for it. conservatives want to keep things the way they are; liberals want things to change. if Jesus wanted things to stay the same, why would he go against the Sanhedrin? If the Apostles who founded the church wanted to stay Jewish, why did they eventually make a schism with the Hebrew faith? Because they were liberal, that’s why.

    As we can all see, we share the same starting point to our lineage, our religions share many important figures, and our basic morals are, believe it or not, almost the same. radical muslims ignore these morals, of course, but they’re the loud minority, as Lyssie put it. Like the great Bart Simpson once said, “Instead of arguing about the dumb little differences, we should all look at the big stupid similarities.” Listen to his words, and don’t have a cow, man.

    Comment by Elephant Bones — November 28, 2007 @ 11:07 pm | Reply

  49. tl;dr version: Christians, Muslims, and Jews all started with Abraham, so we should be able to get along. also, jesus and the apostles were liberals.

    Comment by Elephant Bones — November 28, 2007 @ 11:09 pm | Reply

  50. “If Christianity isn’t conservative, explain why the first ones were. The B.C. Hebrews were conservatives as well. Are you saying that the people that lived in the times recorded in the Bible were wrong about the interpretation of their religion?

    I don’t even know why Spacebrother is arguing that Jesus was a liberal if He Himself is a libertarian. Liberals go for Kookspinach, not Ron Haul. Jesus wasn’t fond of the nobility, since they often disobeyed Him, but He wasn’t fond of nonworking poor, either.”

    Comment by Bob_Corker — November 28, 2007 @ 7:13 pm

    To answer your first question….
    The BC Hebrews were’nt Christains because it was BC (before Christ). The first Christains were Liberals for the fact that they stood for Liberal issues. Christianity itself did’nt become Conservative until hundreds of years after Christs ascention when Western cultures were taking the Gospel according to John literally instead of allegorical.

    On KKKorkkkers second point…..
    I’m not a Libertarian, Republican, Democrat or Green Party person. I vote for who has the right/correct message and I’m batting 1000.

    Ron Paul, Dennis Kucinich and Mike Gravel are the only honest candidates with the right/correct messages. The rest are corporate controlled, special interest mongers who are pro war, pro open borders, pro NAFTA, pro CAFTA and pro WTO cronies.

    Hillary = Guiliani = Obama = Romney = Edwards = Thompson = Biden = Huckabee = Dodd = Tancredo = ect = ect = ect = ect

    “Blessed are the poor” – Jesus Christ

    KKKorkkker is in fantasy land.

    Comment by spacebrother — November 29, 2007 @ 1:53 am | Reply

  51. “tl;dr version: Christians, Muslims, and Jews all started with Abraham, so we should be able to get along. also, jesus and the apostles were liberals.”

    Comment by Elephant Bones — November 28, 2007 @ 11:09 pm

    This is 100% correct. Jesus and the apostles were/are definitely Liberals.

    Comment by spacebrother — November 29, 2007 @ 1:55 am | Reply

  52. I invite you to visist tnis site web which invite you tu know the truth
    nourmohamed

    [Ed Note: This seriously looks like an Islamic propaganda and recruitment site. Visit at your own risk.]

    Comment by Nouralhouda — November 29, 2007 @ 5:35 am | Reply

  53. [Ed Note: This seriously looks like an Islamic propaganda and recruitment site. Visit at your own risk.]

    Basically, that’s what it is, it’s an invitation in several languages sent individually to each of the other major religions inviting them all to join the muslims.
    Interesting though, the title at the top of the first page on the site is “Suicide”

    Comment by Arn — November 29, 2007 @ 1:16 pm | Reply

  54. KKKorkkker, Psykkkeout, BJ Hellbound and 666Sisyphus would all be at home on that sight. They subscribe to the same vat of kkkoolade.

    Comment by Spacebrother — November 29, 2007 @ 1:21 pm | Reply

  55. […] Religion — Psycheout @ 4:29 pm Tags: intolerance, Sudan Previously, Sisyphus brought us the incredible story that exposes the horrendous religious intolerance that is the hallmark of the “religion of […]

    Pingback by Teddygate: The Sentencing « Blogs 4 Brownback — November 29, 2007 @ 4:29 pm | Reply

  56. Hey Moo-slim! Have I got a website for you! This, I feel, is how Moo-slims dream. But not about cows!

    Pigs are not sacred!

    Comment by Bob_Corker — November 29, 2007 @ 5:56 pm | Reply

  57. Hey, Bob, Muslims don’t eat pork because they believe pigs are spiritually unclean. They got that teaching from the Jews. Muslims do not, and have never, worshiped pigs. Do some research before you type, Bob. You’re only making yourself look like a fool.

    Comment by a TRUE Christian — December 4, 2007 @ 10:57 pm | Reply

  58. They want to make us conform to one way. They want America to become a dictatorship. They ignore all reason. Who are ‘they’? ‘They’ are the owners of this blog.

    Comment by Bob — December 8, 2007 @ 7:32 pm | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: