Blogs 4 Brownback

November 26, 2007

I Love You

LoveHello, sorry for the extended absence. My wife and I traveled quite a bit, to a barbaric state where it was hard for me to get online. The homeland of my barbarian ancestors, and my own unholy birthspot. New Jersey.

I don’t want to discuss New Jersey right now. I’m sure many of you people have passed through it on your way to the equally Hellish Democrat states of Pennsylvania, Delaware, and New York; those who haven’t can find out all they ever want to know about the place by thoroughly studying the contents of their toilet bowls. Suffice it to say that most of my family does not agree with our political and religious views. Words were exchanged, thoughts were voiced in anger, prayers were (temporarily) unanswered. I can only hope that the Lord shows my brother Jason the way off of the path to damnation he now treads in the company of Obama Bin Laden and the Democrat Party.

I found myself missing you folks. I love my family, but you are my online family. I love you all, even the wilfully Hellbound among you (like Spacebrother and Tyler Durden, for starters). I know that I’m frequently critical of many of you, especially when I’m exasperated by your pig-headed unwillingness to see the facts of things, but please bear in mind that I always love you all. I love everyone as my brother, as Jesus commanded me to do. (Not my brother Jason, either. The good brother, Scott. I love you all like I love Scott.)

Some of you may find it hard to reconcile this love with some of the things I say. To my way of thinking, most of those I love will find themselves in Hell when they die. This saddens me, and often makes me lash out at them in anger. It breaks my heart that while I, and those of the Blessed like Senator Brownback, are enjoying our eternal repose in bliss at the pedestal of God, the treefrogs and atheists will choke back tears of pain and anguish in a Hell created of their own iniquitous sedition.

Such is the will of God, however, and everything happens for a reason. For some people, it would be better if they had never been born. I, for example, would choose oblivion over life as an Iranian Muslim followed by damnation for the sin of living an unexamined, unrepented life as a Persian heretic who exulted in the deaths of American Christians. To my way of thinking, tough love is called for. Tough love says that we need to cut our losses. Better that 80 million Iranians burn in Hell after a war than that they reproduce, and cause 300 million Iranians to burn in Hell 100 years from now. 220 million of those Iranians needn’t even be conceived. They could be spared the fires of Hell, had liberals proven willing to use nuclear weapons now for the sake of the souls of the children of those we must kill.

That’s called tough love, and if it doesn’t appeal to you you probably have issues with Christianity. God knows best, and directs the hands of His servants accordingly. When God provides the signal, President Brownback shall cleanse the world of as much sin as humanly possible. A sinner who dies will not pass his sin on to his children. If one of my brothers must suffer that 5 of my other brothers not suffer, I consider the decision already made.

I would caution all of you to think about your lives, and ask yourselves how a life without God can even be worth living. If the few decades allotted to you are so hollow, empty, and pointless, imagine how the eternity of torment awaiting you in Hell will feel. Please, in the name of the love I feel for you all, I urge you to repent now. Embrace Christianity and the Republican Party while life still courses through your veins and God still smiles on you with grace. There is always time to repent, until life leaves your bones. As a former Democrat, I know. Trust me.

I love you all. May God bless you, and I hope you all had a wonderful Thanksgiving dinner. Thank you.

268 Comments »

  1. Awww, i feel all tingly inside, but i’m not sure if it’s from your love, or from the nuclear weapons you seem so interested in using.

    Comment by Elephant Bones — November 26, 2007 @ 9:37 am | Reply

  2. Love the sinner and hate the sin – just like Jesus instructs. That’s my motto.

    As a Christian (Republican Baptist) I am obliged to love all of my fellow human beings, even the hell bound Liberals, but their sins stand directly in opposition to Biblical truth so I cherish the fact that I am to hate that part of them.

    That said, the Liberals deserve every horrifying, gruesome, torturous detail of the wrath of God coming their way and I welcome the opportunity to witness it.

    Comment by Mrs. T.D. Gaines-Crockett — November 26, 2007 @ 9:48 am | Reply

  3. Tough love with a nuke. Siffylus your insanity has now been confirmed. It’s time for you to crawl into your little cave and die.
    The difference between us is the fact that I would gladly give my life for those I love, while you would rather kill those you love. And since you love yourself so much I’m sure you know what to do,,, kill yourself.

    Comment by Arn — November 26, 2007 @ 10:36 am | Reply

  4. “you know what to do,,, kill yourself.”

    What a horrid evil little man this Arn is. Like a dwarf or gollum unfit for human society. At least he’s not permitted in church.

    Comment by Marty McPain — November 26, 2007 @ 10:41 am | Reply

  5. Wrong again McVain, I am allowed in church. And I’m evil? Siffy wants to nuke millions of people, just how evil is that? Get a few in a country that he doesn’t like and his answer is to nuke all of them, the only ones I think should kill themselves are the ones that want to kill all those that disagree with them.
    You are all wrong, everyone has a right to live on this planet (which is still round and orbiting the sun), not just those that go along with your insane ideas. If you love someone, kill them. Yep, you’re all idiots.

    Comment by Arn — November 26, 2007 @ 10:59 am | Reply

  6. Arn,

    Is it wrong to try to save people from Hell? If we Christians don’t help these people they will suffer eternal torment. What is a nuclear weapon or two next to that? Sisyphus has real love for you, not the cheep, depraved kind. That means he is willing to do the tough and hard things when the going gets rough. If it means a taser gets used, well so be it. You see him here on this blog trying to help everyone the best he can. The man is a saint, not murder.

    Comment by BJ Tabor — November 26, 2007 @ 11:06 am | Reply

  7. Which verse best describes you ARN?

    “Leviticus 21:17-23 (KJV)

    17 Speak unto Aaron, saying, Whosoever he be of thy seed in their generations that hath any blemish, let him not approach to offer the bread of his God.

    18 For whatsoever man he be that hath a blemish, he shall not approach: a blind man, or a lame, or he that hath a flat nose, or any thing superfluous,

    19 Or a man that is brokenfooted, or brokenhanded,

    20 Or crookbackt, or a dwarf, or that hath a blemish in his eye, or be scurvy, or scabbed, or hath his stones broken;

    21 No man that hath a blemish of the seed of Aaron the priest shall come nigh to offer the offerings of the LORD made by fire: he hath a blemish; he shall not come nigh to offer the bread of his God. ”

    I see you as a crookbacked, ball-less, scurvy-ridden dwarf.

    Still think you are allowed in a Christian Church? You must be going to wizard school instead of Church you lefto-fasist heathen.

    Comment by Marty McPain — November 26, 2007 @ 11:25 am | Reply

  8. Come on BJ, just how does nuking someone save them from hell,, you’re just as stupid as Siffy.
    Let’s see, what is a nuke or two compared to saving souls? First, there is no such thing as a nuke or two, everyone knows the procedure when it comes to firing off nukes. One side fires, it takes a few minutes for the other side to confirm the firing, then they retaliate with their own strike, within about 20 minutes both sides are committed to total release (this is true even if the other side has no nukes because their allies have them) within an hour mushroom clouds start appearing all over both countries, soon the world is under the effects of nuclear winter and everyone, including you, dies. Yep, definately sounds like nukes are the way to go.(and don’t worry Ms. Grainy-Crotch, you would definately get the opportunity to watch it, for just a second before you died)

    You folks really do need to get a brain, even just one to share between you would be better than what you have now.

    Comment by Arn — November 26, 2007 @ 11:26 am | Reply

  9. “I see you as a crookbacked, ball-less, scurvy-ridden dwarf.”

    I think it’s already been established who the ball-less ones are here. You folks talk about people from the safety of your little computers, and not a single one of you have the balls to say
    any of that to our faces. Of course, if you would like to deny that, feel free to come deny it to my face, or don’t bother denying it at all.

    Comment by Arn — November 26, 2007 @ 11:43 am | Reply

  10. PROTIP: using God as an excuse to commit evil doesn’t make it ok.

    Marty, you have NO right to call people horrid. You people never miss a chance to make some insipid comment about people you don’t like. At least try to make an arguement without resorting to namecalling. Cmon, it shouldn’t be that hard. I can wait.

    Comment by Elephant Bones — November 26, 2007 @ 12:10 pm | Reply

  11. Also, Dwarves are the best class of humanoid fantasy creatures. Don’t diss them.

    Comment by Elephant Bones — November 26, 2007 @ 12:12 pm | Reply

  12. The only reason why Peter Jackson didn’t cast you was cause you were too scary (even without makeup) to be shown to any audience in the world (including blind people)

    Comment by Moxom — November 26, 2007 @ 12:15 pm | Reply

  13. As far as Sisyphus and Marty are concerned, their comments can be summed up by this nifty picture of Captain Picard.

    sorry about the fragmented posting, my computer is experiencing technical difficulties

    Comment by Elephant Bones — November 26, 2007 @ 12:16 pm | Reply

  14. lol Elephant Bones

    Comment by Moxom — November 26, 2007 @ 12:18 pm | Reply

  15. This Arn fellow sounds like he might be one of those Branch Davidian people who lives in a hovel in the middle of nowhere and eats bugs. He has all the markings of a nut!

    Praying for him.

    Comment by Mrs. T.D. Gaines-Crockett — November 26, 2007 @ 12:22 pm | Reply

  16. “He has all the markings of a nut!”

    And would you like me to tell everyone where all of your markings are little miss crotch rider?

    Comment by Arn — November 26, 2007 @ 12:30 pm | Reply

  17. lol Arn

    Comment by Moxom — November 26, 2007 @ 12:32 pm | Reply

  18. I’m sure you’re doing a lot of things, Mrs. Crockett, but I seriously doubt you are praying for him. Given what you’ve previously posted, I doubt you would so much as bat an eye if you saw Arn getting torn apart by crocodiles. We aren’t asking you to care, but please don’t insult our intelligence by pretending that you do. The only reason you’d pray for him would be if you were praying for his immediate and painful demise.

    Comment by Elephant Bones — November 26, 2007 @ 12:38 pm | Reply

  19. Let’s go back to who started the name-calling:

    “And since you love yourself so much I’m sure you know what to do,,, kill yourself. Comment by Arn — November 26, 2007 @ 10:36 am ”

    that’s right . .Arnus

    The looney short-statured freak who lives in a hole in the ground insulted our beautiful, humble, God-fearing Sisyphus. And then YOU, Elephant-Ass, compound the insults with your painfully distorted posts.

    You deliberately typed like that to inflict a pain similar to organ failure or death on me! Oh I need to rub capsaicin in my nose to get the stench of your comments away form me.

    Comment by Marty McPain — November 26, 2007 @ 12:40 pm | Reply

  20. Arn,

    Do you really think people burning in Hell is that funny you don’t want to help them? I am sorry but I can’t be as cold blooded about it as you.

    Comment by BJ Tabor — November 26, 2007 @ 12:42 pm | Reply

  21. ok, besides the fact that you’ve already proven yourself incapable of posting without resorting to childish namecalling, Arn was not the one to start it. I wasn’t referring to this thread; i meant this entire site. i’ll bet you 5000 internets that the first punch was thrown by one of the conservatives.
    also, you are one serious masochist, marty. first bleach in the eyes, then capsicum in your nose. yikes >.<

    Comment by Elephant Bones — November 26, 2007 @ 12:54 pm | Reply

  22. I don’t know who this Arn is and I really don’t care. All I had to do was look at his profile and see that he is nothing but low class white trash. Sisyphus, you deserve better than to have that lowlife human turd come to your blog and disrespect you the way he and some of these other losers have. I will be joining Mrs. TDGC in prayer for the Lord to swoop down and smite them with something awful.

    I’m really glad you had a nice holiday!

    God Bless!🙂

    Lynelle

    Comment by Lynelle Bryant - USE Ministry Leader — November 26, 2007 @ 12:57 pm | Reply

  23. And would you like me to tell everyone where all of your markings are little miss crotch rider?

    Wow…aren’t you the gentleman? I know I’ve been away for awhile, but I have to say that we’ve gained some rather rude commenters. If you disagree with Mrs. T.D. Gaines-Crockett, that is most certainly your prerogative. But by making up degrading and lurid nicknames about her, you are only making yourself appear to be quite a boor.

    Comment by Lyssie — November 26, 2007 @ 1:00 pm | Reply

  24. Wow, the annual Sixsixsixiphus clone meeting. Hillbilly inbreed can surely create a big mess…..so glad not to be a redneck.

    Comment by Moxom — November 26, 2007 @ 1:02 pm | Reply

  25. Haven’t posted in a long time due to some health reasons but glad to see you carrying on the good fight for conservative causes. The comments left here by some of these haters, the hippie communists, are proof that America needs to do a major ethic cleansing starting with the democratic party. God Guns Glory all the way!

    Comment by Montana Joe — November 26, 2007 @ 1:05 pm | Reply

  26. OK, enough with all the namecalling already! I’d just go back to 4chan if that’s all i cared about. Is there a reason we can’t have a discussion like the adults we all claim to be?

    Comment by Elephant Bones — November 26, 2007 @ 1:11 pm | Reply

  27. Somehow I sense the absence of their chicken-footed leader……guess he ran away together with Brownneck cause he couldn’t face it anymore to be outdiscussed at every post he wrote (which is logical, he was a militant vegetable-mind to begin with)

    Comment by Moxom — November 26, 2007 @ 1:11 pm | Reply

  28. Ps calling her (deleted. Watch it, Potty Mouth) ain’t degrading…..it is pure flattery.

    Comment by Moxom — November 26, 2007 @ 1:13 pm | Reply

  29. Moxom, I deleted many of your comments that were in moderation, as they were gratuitously insulting, disgusting, and contributed absolutely nothing to the discussion. If you want to disagree with people, disagree with them. There is no need for the homophobic, belittling, and downright nasty personal attacks that you were writing.

    Comment by Lyssie — November 26, 2007 @ 1:13 pm | Reply

  30. “Let’s go back to who started the name-calling:

    “And since you love yourself so much I’m sure you know what to do,,, kill yourself. Comment by Arn — November 26, 2007 @ 10:36 am ”

    that’s right . .Arnus”

    I’m sorry, McPain, but could you please point out where in that sentence I called someone a name? Nowhere, you dope.

    “I see you as a crookbacked, ball-less, scurvy-ridden dwarf.”

    You, on the other hand, did resort to name calling. You are a liar and an idiot.

    And little miss Lynelle, you are kinda new to me, but I’d be glad to rip you a new one along with the rest of these idiots. “that lowlife human turd” I see you like name calling too, so you will be another easy one to dump back into the gutter you came out of.

    Comment by Arn — November 26, 2007 @ 1:15 pm | Reply

  31. “I think it’s already been established who the ball-less ones are here.”

    I’m told that when children are misbehaving, taking their ball away from them is a sensible form of punishment. Of course, if the misbehavior continues unabated, it’s time for a spanking. That’s tough love. The ball-less ones are the ne’er-do-well kids out there.

    “You folks talk about people from the safety of your little computers, and not a single one of you have the testicles [edit] to say
    any of that to our faces.”

    No one speaks with their genitals, Arn. No one I know, anyway.

    “Of course, if you would like to deny that, feel free to come deny it to my face, or don’t bother denying it at all.”

    If I knew what you were talking about, this might mean something to me.

    “Do you really think people burning in Hell is that funny you don’t want to help them? I am sorry but I can’t be as cold blooded about it as you.”

    It’s sad, isn’t it, BJ? These mooonbats are very sick people. We should pray for their redemption but prepare ourselves for their damnation.

    “I don’t know who this Arn is and I really don’t care. All I had to do was look at his profile and see that he is nothing but low class white trash. Sisyphus, you deserve better than to have that lowlife human turd come to your blog and disrespect you the way he and some of these other losers have. I will be joining Mrs. TDGC in prayer for the Lord to swoop down and smite them with something awful.”

    Thank you, Lynelle. I can’t think of anything worse than being a self-hating atheist Helioleftist Darwinist Marxist Islamist, personally. Really, your life would be a living Hell before you even died. I pity these fools immensely. Meanwhile, they can say what they will about me. I love them, and my heart is great. I can take it.

    “I’m really glad you had a nice holiday!”

    Thank you! I hope yours was nice as well!

    Comment by Sisyphus — November 26, 2007 @ 1:16 pm | Reply

  32. “Wow, the annual Sixsixsixiphus clone meeting. Hillbilly inbreed can surely create a big mess…..so glad not to be a redneck.”

    Those people are are saintlier and more God-fearing than you’ll ever be, treefrog.

    Comment by Sisyphus — November 26, 2007 @ 1:17 pm | Reply

  33. It don’t matter if this Moxom really is retarted, there is no reason to talk that way. I don’t care how low his IQ, a real man respects a lady at all times. You got that, sport?

    Comment by Montana Joe — November 26, 2007 @ 1:19 pm | Reply

  34. “Haven’t posted in a long time due to some health reasons but glad to see you carrying on the good fight for conservative causes. The comments left here by some of these haters, the hippie communists, are proof that America needs to do a major ethic cleansing starting with the democratic party. God Guns Glory all the way!”

    Amen!

    “Somehow I sense the absence of their chicken-footed leader……guess he ran away together with Brownneck cause he couldn’t face it anymore to be outdiscussed at every post he wrote (which is logical, he was a militant vegetable-mind to begin with)”

    My only leader is Jesus, you freethinking Copernican scumbag.

    Comment by Sisyphus — November 26, 2007 @ 1:21 pm | Reply

  35. I promise you that Arn wouldn’t stand in front of me and say things like that. Skinny little pinko communist would have my size 13 boot introduced to his butt pronto.

    Comment by Montana Joe — November 26, 2007 @ 1:21 pm | Reply

  36. You’d have to go through me first, Montanna Joe. I’m not afraid of you, neither is anyone fighting the good fight here. You’re attempts to appear masculine only make me smile, because real men don’t even need to fight with their fists when their words should suffice. This is a battle of wits on this site, and you would do well to arm yourself.

    Comment by Elephant Bones — November 26, 2007 @ 1:25 pm | Reply

  37. And you make freethinking sound like a bad thing, Sisyphus

    Comment by Elephant Bones — November 26, 2007 @ 1:28 pm | Reply

  38. Moxom, I deleted many of your comments that were in moderation, as they were gratuitously insulting, disgusting, and contributed absolutely nothing to the discussion. If you want to disagree with people, disagree with them. There is no need for the homophobic, belittling, and downright nasty personal attacks that you were writing.

    Nonsense Clyssie, you couldn’t stand them cause you were too dumb to reply to them.

    Comment by Moxom — November 26, 2007 @ 1:28 pm | Reply

  39. As a christian woman it’s nice to know that decent men like Sisyphus, BJ, and Joe exist to carry on chivalry. God loves real men like you guys a lot more than scabbie ridden, sissy boys like Arn.

    Aside from being plain ignorant, he looks like he needs a bath and I know he needs a gasoline gargle followed by a lit match for that filthy mouth of his.

    Thank you for defending the honor of the ladies here.

    God Bless!🙂

    Lynelle

    Comment by Lynelle Bryant - USE Ministry Leader — November 26, 2007 @ 1:29 pm | Reply

  40. It is people like you who are disgusting……but alas, this seems to be the 4th Reich chat.

    Comment by Moxom — November 26, 2007 @ 1:29 pm | Reply

  41. Reply to comment 39 (your hair coluor fits your lack of intelligence Swine-nelle

    Comment by Moxom — November 26, 2007 @ 1:30 pm | Reply

  42. a real man respects a lady at all times. You got that, sport?

    Comment by Montana Joe — November 26, 2007 @ 1:19 pm

    You obviously haven’t been reading the other posts that your comrades have put on here,, they disrespect women to the point of slavery, watch what you say or they may think you’re on our side.

    And feel free to bring that size 13 shoe over here any day, Do you know what it means to poop and fall backwards? I could teach ya the meaning real quick, want my address?

    [Ed Note: Do you know what it means to be banned for profanity and making threats of violence? I sense a time out coming for you.]

    Comment by Arn — November 26, 2007 @ 1:31 pm | Reply

  43. Put a sock in it, Elephant Boner, and not the other way around. You are a confirmed idiot and God hates idiots almost as much as he hates sissified little freaks like Arn and Moxom.

    I have to pick the girls up from school so I’ll see you all later.

    God Bless!🙂

    Lynelle

    Comment by Lynelle Bryant - USE Ministry Leader — November 26, 2007 @ 1:32 pm | Reply

  44. have fun deleting Clyssie……hurry up, fat redneck, do something for your hamburgers or God will kick your rear.

    Comment by Moxom — November 26, 2007 @ 1:32 pm | Reply

  45. I consider myself a gentleman, but chivalry does not mean just rolling over and agreeing with whatever a woman says. chivalry does not mean treating all women like goddesses, because we all know some ladies that certainly don’t deserve it. the least any gentleman can do is be polite and decent, which is what i’m trying to do.

    Comment by Elephant Bones — November 26, 2007 @ 1:33 pm | Reply

  46. hahaha Swine-Nelle…..It’s not God that you hear talking in your head……you forgot to take the pills for your mental disease while writing.

    Comment by Moxom — November 26, 2007 @ 1:33 pm | Reply

  47. Yeah let’s be decent…….let’s exchange some nice cookie recepies with the ladies here.

    Comment by Moxom — November 26, 2007 @ 1:34 pm | Reply

  48. Freak!

    Comment by Lynelle Bryant - USE Ministry Leader — November 26, 2007 @ 1:35 pm | Reply

  49. Ingredients:

    2/3 cup Sugar
    1 cup softened Butter
    2 tsp Vanilla Essence
    1 tsp grated Lemon Peel
    1 Egg Yolk
    2 1/4 cup Fine Wheat Flour (Maida)
    1 1/2 cup grounded Hazelnuts
    1/2 cup Jam

    How to make hazelnut cookie recipe:

    * Preheat the oven at 325 degrees.
    * In a bowl mix sugar and butter.
    * Beat the mixture till soft and fluffy.
    * Add vanilla essence, lemon peel and egg yolk.
    * Mix well.
    * Add the flour and the hazelnuts.
    * Make a soft dough.
    * Make 1 1/4 size balls out of the dough.
    * Take a ungreased cookies sheet and place the balls on it 2 inches apart.
    * Press the cookies in the center with the thumb.
    * Bake the cookiesat 325 degrees for 10 to 15 minutes or until light golden brown around edges.
    * Let them cool.
    * When completely cool fill the cavity of each cookie with ½ teaspoon jam.

    Happy munchin, and try to behave as well, ladies!!!

    Comment by Moxom — November 26, 2007 @ 1:36 pm | Reply

  50. I take comment 47 as a BIG compliment, Lynelle…..thank you, I love beeing freaky……God loves you too.

    Comment by Moxom — November 26, 2007 @ 1:37 pm | Reply

  51. (send them a pudding to discuss or something, Arn)
    (soul food for the hungry, even those who are hungry for heaven)

    Comment by Moxom — November 26, 2007 @ 1:44 pm | Reply

  52. i am rubber, you are glue, arn?

    Ms. Bryant, calling me a freak does not make me want to be polite. You get what you give, and you’re not giving me very much. The world runs on the principle of equivalent exchange.

    Comment by Elephant Bones — November 26, 2007 @ 1:47 pm | Reply

  53. wait, why did my post appear before arn’s?

    Comment by Elephant Bones — November 26, 2007 @ 1:47 pm | Reply

  54. “scabbie ridden, sissy boys like Arn.”

    Insult me all you like, I rather enjoy it. Insults from the likes of you people I tend to take as compliments, and compliments are always appreciated, no matter what the source.

    Comment by Arn — November 26, 2007 @ 1:48 pm | Reply

  55. it happened again!

    Comment by Elephant Bones — November 26, 2007 @ 1:48 pm | Reply

  56. Remember to put Hendrix on when you eat it……..”Electric Ladyland” will do, lovely record, nice sleeve, nice music.

    Comment by Moxom — November 26, 2007 @ 1:49 pm | Reply

  57. That was really sweet. You sure have been blessed with a big heart, Sisyphus.

    Comment by Psycheout — November 26, 2007 @ 1:49 pm | Reply

  58. yay, cookies! thanks a bunch ^^

    Comment by Elephant Bones — November 26, 2007 @ 1:51 pm | Reply

  59. Guess somebody didn’t need drugs to hallucinate, hence the deletion of my comment……alas, I prefer absinthe anyway.

    Comment by Moxom — November 26, 2007 @ 1:51 pm | Reply

  60. (delete it, buddy, anyone had a good laugh already)

    Comment by Moxom — November 26, 2007 @ 1:54 pm | Reply

  61. I consider myself a gentleman, but chivalry does not mean just rolling over and agreeing with whatever a woman says. chivalry does not mean treating all women like goddesses, because we all know some ladies that certainly don’t deserve it. the least any gentleman can do is be polite and decent, which is what i’m trying to do.

    Comment by Elephant Bones —

    Precisely. There is no reason whatsoever for us to be uncivil with each other, even if we completely disagree with each other.

    Oh and Moxom? Calling me “Clyssie”? Now THAT’s funny! I can’t imagine how on Earth you came up with the idea to add an extra letter onto my name! What a clever, witty fellow you are. My land…we really are fortunate to have such acomedic genius gracing us with his presence. And it’s so beautiful in its simplicity! My name is Lyssie, and you simply thought to add an extra letter onto it, thereby making it hilarious! Oh my…my sides are just aching with laughter. You really MUST tell me where you developed such a rapier-sharp wit, Moxom.

    Comment by Lyssie — November 26, 2007 @ 1:54 pm | Reply

  62. You really MUST tell me where you developed such a rapier-sharp wit, Moxom.

    Nope, I gave you a free cookie recipe, that’s enough, greed is BAD.

    Comment by Moxom — November 26, 2007 @ 1:57 pm | Reply

  63. thank you, lyssie. glad to hear another reasonable voice in this chaotic brawl

    Comment by Elephant Bones — November 26, 2007 @ 1:58 pm | Reply

  64. (crash couse in humor:part 2,
    adding more than 1 letter to Lyssie
    Lyssie+2(C and M)=Clyssmie

    No offense, young lady, just kiddin’

    Comment by Moxom — November 26, 2007 @ 2:05 pm | Reply

  65. who’s doing the moderating today? these comments keep showing up in different orders.

    Better check my winter stash, I think these folks have been smoking up my good stuff.

    Comment by Arn — November 26, 2007 @ 2:06 pm | Reply

  66. “i am rubber, you are glue, arn?”

    Huh?

    Comment by Arn — November 26, 2007 @ 2:07 pm | Reply

  67. who’s doing the moderating today
    (Jerry Springer, I bet
    ….it’s the same kind of joke, only the online version)

    Comment by Moxom — November 26, 2007 @ 2:08 pm | Reply

  68. Sorry Arn — it’s been hard to keep up with the moderating, as some folks have been rather verbose today. As well, I’ve been moderating some, and it’s likely that Psycheoutis moderating some as well. Perhaps that’s why things are a touch discombobulated.

    Comment by Lyssie — November 26, 2007 @ 2:09 pm | Reply

  69. My goodness, I step away from this blog for a few hours and I see Moxom, Elephant Bones and Arn have spent the whole time attack the ladies. What’s next for you guys; attacking children? bad mouthing cripples? PRAISE Jesus He saw fit to bestow upon me the grace not to behave so callously.

    Comment by BJ Tabor — November 26, 2007 @ 2:11 pm | Reply

  70. Wow, our true hero BJ (Brownback’s Jester) wants to bomb whole communities and plays the innocent child loving dude……10 hypochristianity points to you!!

    Comment by Moxom — November 26, 2007 @ 2:14 pm | Reply

  71. By the way, BJ, we were talking about food.

    Comment by Moxom — November 26, 2007 @ 2:15 pm | Reply

  72. About this moderating thing, wouldn’t it be better to have unbiased people do the moderating, someone who doesn’t show preference to one side or the other, but just makes sure comments stay within legal guidelines, not ones that delete and alter the comments they disagree with?

    It’s kind of a pity that you have that kind of power over this site and still manage to lose every arguement. Perhaps if your brain power was as great as your power to delete you wouldn’t have that problem.

    Comment by Arn — November 26, 2007 @ 2:16 pm | Reply

  73. No bombs today, BJ…..we want your favorite recipe for a pie.
    So we can all bake happily later this evening to celebrate life.

    Comment by Moxom — November 26, 2007 @ 2:18 pm | Reply

  74. “bad mouthing cripples?”
    Comment by BJ Tabor — November 26, 2007 @ 2:11 pm

    Don’t need to, McPain done did that in comment #7. Perhaps you should talk to him about that.

    Comment by Arn — November 26, 2007 @ 2:19 pm | Reply

  75. (maybe the moderator made and ate those hashish brownies…..hell, I even included the warning not to eat too much of it)

    Comment by Moxom — November 26, 2007 @ 2:20 pm | Reply

  76. [Ed Note: Do you know what it means to be banned for profanity and making threats of violence? I sense a time out coming for you.]

    “Skinny little pinko communist would have my size 13 boot introduced to his butt pronto.”

    Who made the threat first? I merely told him to go ahead and try.

    Comment by Arn — November 26, 2007 @ 2:26 pm | Reply

  77. It’s good to see you’re back. Obviously some people don’t share your agape. Your comment about children not inheriting their parents sins makes me wonder about the millions of unborn and unbaptized fetuses murdered every day. Are their mothers condemning their babies to hell as well as themselves?

    Comment by dadaclu — November 26, 2007 @ 2:28 pm | Reply

  78. If you would time-out him, Ednose there would be no sane discussion at all.

    Comment by Moxom — November 26, 2007 @ 2:33 pm | Reply

  79. When God provides the signal, President Brownback shall cleanse the world of as much sin as humanly possible.

    Who the hell was/is president Brownback anyway?
    I thought your usurper is called Bush.

    Comment by Moxom — November 26, 2007 @ 2:37 pm | Reply

  80. About this moderating thing, wouldn’t it be better to have unbiased people do the moderating, someone who doesn’t show preference to one side or the other, but just makes sure comments stay within legal guidelines, not ones that delete and alter the comments they disagree with?

    If you’ve read this site for any amount of time, you’ll see that the only comments that are deleted or altered are ones that contain language that is not family-friendly. That policy has been in place since this site commenced. If you ask any of our long-time commenters, you’ll find out that we welcome a very broad range of opinions. All we ask is that you keep the language PG-rated. If that’s too much to ask, then perhaps you may want to take a look at your debating skills.

    Comment by Lyssie — November 26, 2007 @ 2:44 pm | Reply

  81. As always the comments have gotten off topic and into the usual insult tossing bickering match that this site is famous for.
    Let’s get back on topic here and re-read what the post says according to Sisy.
    Sisy loves everyone so much that he would be willing to nuke millions of innocent women and children, submit the entire planet to the effects of nuclear winter, and kill everyone who is not a Republican just to show us all how much love he has for us.

    Sisy: That van outside in your driveway with the men in white jackets getting out of it, they are there for you, just go quietly and take you meds as prescribed and everything will be ok.

    Comment by Arn — November 26, 2007 @ 2:47 pm | Reply

  82. Well, start deleting the murder threats like “spammers should be shot”
    and sexist things like “all women are harlots”
    Put your money where your mouth is.

    Comment by Moxom — November 26, 2007 @ 2:47 pm | Reply

  83. More insults from Ann. That time out might be a good idea.

    Comment by Psycheout — November 26, 2007 @ 2:50 pm | Reply

  84. don’t you mean “More truth from Arn” and nothing makes you want to give someone a time-out more than when they tell the truth.

    Comment by Arn — November 26, 2007 @ 2:52 pm | Reply

  85. Moxom – first of all, those comments don’t contain profanity. However, I would like for you to provide links to those comments, so that I can take a look at them for myself.

    As far as spammers go, I don’t advocate shooting people (except in self-defense, of course), but I do feel that spammers should be very heavily fined and prosecuted. They are a scourge.

    Comment by Lyssie — November 26, 2007 @ 2:55 pm | Reply

  86. Moxom – first of all, those comments don’t contain profanity.

    Okay, if you say so, harlot!

    Comment by Moxom — November 26, 2007 @ 2:56 pm | Reply

  87. (you are a woman/all women are harlots/ so you are a harlot too, and also your mother…..calling all women harlots is NOT profane)

    Comment by Moxom — November 26, 2007 @ 2:58 pm | Reply

  88. So are you going to provide those links? My guess is that you’re too lazy, and prefer to spend your time leveling personal insults at those people with whom you disagree.

    Either that, or you’re completely full of baloney.

    Comment by Lyssie — November 26, 2007 @ 2:59 pm | Reply

  89. However, I would like for you to provide links to those comments, so that I can take a look at them for myself.
    cool….. I will take care of that later.

    Comment by Moxom — November 26, 2007 @ 2:59 pm | Reply

  90. BTW those aren’t comments….these are topics on this board

    Comment by Moxom — November 26, 2007 @ 3:00 pm | Reply

  91. So are you going to provide those links? My guess is that you’re too lazy

    well who is belittling whom here?

    Comment by Moxom — November 26, 2007 @ 3:02 pm | Reply

  92. Go look em up yourself, YOU work on this site which means YOU are to lazy to read your site…..do something for your work

    Comment by Moxom — November 26, 2007 @ 3:03 pm | Reply

  93. Study: Women Are Harlots

    [Ed Note: Please learn to embed your links. See the rules page.]

    Comment by Moxom — November 26, 2007 @ 3:04 pm | Reply

  94. Homosexuals Are Responsible for the Wildfires

    who is the homophobic one here?

    Comment by Moxom — November 26, 2007 @ 3:06 pm | Reply

  95. etc etc etc.

    Comment by Moxom — November 26, 2007 @ 3:06 pm | Reply

  96. I don’t advocate shooting people (good girl!!!PEACE)

    So at least we agree on something.

    [Ed Note: Sheesh, get your own blog or at least consolidate your comments. This isn’t “The Moxom Show,” and if you think it is, you may just find yourself cancelled.]

    Comment by Moxom — November 26, 2007 @ 3:09 pm | Reply

  97. Lyssie: I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt here, you may have been away from here for awhile, so I would like to suggest that you go back through some of these posts and just see how many people your co-horts here have said need to be killed, Bob Corker even threatened to shoot my face off, that was a clear threat of murder, and the only reason you don’t see their profanities is because they cleverly disguise them with cute little mis spellings of other words,

    In short, they are childish little imps that have absolutely nothing to back up their posts and the only defense they have for what they believe lies in their ability to insult others.
    Seems like I remember kids doing that in kindergarten.

    Comment by Arn — November 26, 2007 @ 3:10 pm | Reply

  98. And since you are a very busy bee, I will leave you now to read and do whatever you wanna do…..keep it safe, see you in the future.

    Reshvathotep Kathuul Khan, on behalf of the Moxom collective.

    Comment by Moxom — November 26, 2007 @ 3:12 pm | Reply

  99. Greetings to you as well Arn….see you in Space.

    Comment by Moxom — November 26, 2007 @ 3:13 pm | Reply

  100. Arn!

    What on earth are you doing? Insulting these poor ol gals like that? For shame! That is no way to treat a lady. If you don’t like what some female is saying why don’t you just act like a REAL man and simply ignore them as if they aren’t even there.

    I am very disappointed in you and your repulsive behavior Arn.

    Oh, and God Bless.

    Comment by Brother WhoDat Glory Pines Ministry — November 26, 2007 @ 3:28 pm | Reply

  101. Why Brother WhoDat, don’t you realise that the most cruel thing you can do to any woman is ignore her?
    It drives them to the point of insanity, by acknowedging them I am preserving their sanity.

    Comment by Arn — November 26, 2007 @ 3:37 pm | Reply

  102. and who will be the first to jump on my typo?

    [Ed Note: I think you just did. You win.]

    Comment by Arn — November 26, 2007 @ 3:39 pm | Reply

  103. good lord, give me patience. i finally find an opponent who will argue with minimal namecalling (lyssie), and suddenly the discussion gets flooded with people who just LOVE pointing fingers (almost everyone else). This is why we can’t have nice things. Arn is right here. the only time the mods filter out vulgar and threatening language is when anyone besides the board’s cronies (no offense, lyssie) say anything.
    Sisyphus wants to send Lindsey Lohan to Gitmo? no problem. Bob Corker rants about enslaving women and never letting them have rights? no problem. Arn says “poop” in his post? OMG, YOU GONNA GET BANNED FOR BRINGING SUCH FILTH TO THIS SITE!!! Jesus gave his life combating the injustice of hypocrites like you. now you’re using him as a shield for your disgusting verbal excrement. for shame, for shame.

    also, if you are all interested in fine recipes and the like, i suggest visiting 4chan’s food and cooking board. moxom, enjoy.

    [Ed Note: Read the rules, EB.]

    Comment by Elephant Bones — November 26, 2007 @ 3:45 pm | Reply

  104. furthermore, what’s with all the messed up timestamps? it’s getting hard to follow the insult fest because comments are out of order.

    Comment by Elephant Bones — November 26, 2007 @ 3:53 pm | Reply

  105. Lyssie, I suggest you go to the post on Lyndsay Lohan and read comment #62 by your own beloved Bob Corker.
    He suggests that you should be the property of men and not allowed any rights of your own, and you should not be allowed in public unless you are in chains.
    If you want to find disrespect of women, you need not look any further than your own site here and the people that are on your side.

    Comment by Arn — November 26, 2007 @ 4:03 pm | Reply

  106. also, if you are all interested in fine recipes and the like, i suggest visiting 4chan’s food and cooking board. moxom, enjoy.

    Thanx EB.lolol.

    Comment by Moxom — November 26, 2007 @ 4:04 pm | Reply

  107. see? see what just happened up there? that’s exactly what i’m talking about. they ignore the vile things their cohorts say, and get on our case for a little profanity.

    [Ed Note: READ THE RULES.]

    Comment by Elephant Bones — November 26, 2007 @ 4:05 pm | Reply

  108. Why is everyone so hurt-full? Can’t the helio-fascists just accept Jesus, the Bible and the good intentions of B4B? In that order?

    Why is life such a struggle? Why is reading this board just like licking broken glass on a hot tar street? I wish I had the answers.

    Comment by Marty McPain — November 26, 2007 @ 4:13 pm | Reply

  109. I READ THE RULES, I WAS MAKING A POINT BY PUTTING THE WORD IN THERE. I HOPE SOMEONE UNDERSTOOD WHAT I WAS TRYING TO SHOW

    Comment by Elephant Bones — November 26, 2007 @ 4:14 pm | Reply

  110. [Ed Note: Read the rules, EB.]
    [Ed Note: READ THE RULES.]

    (a feeble attempt to be poetic?)

    Hey Eddo…..have a nice time
    Read a book.
    Adios Gringo….

    Comment by Moxom — November 26, 2007 @ 4:15 pm | Reply

  111. more masochistic non-sequitors from Marty McPain, always a pleasure -_-
    and it’s hurtful, not hurt-full. i know it’s really anal to bring that up, but given that the conservatives grill us for it all the time, fair is fair.

    Comment by Elephant Bones — November 26, 2007 @ 4:16 pm | Reply

  112. If you like licking streets Marty, feel free to lick our street as well.

    Comment by Moxom — November 26, 2007 @ 4:23 pm | Reply

  113. Elephant Dung,

    Are you homer-sexual?

    I only ask because you use the word “anal” a lot. Did you know that there is a de-programming ministry tht can help you? I just hope you have enough money to take the cure.

    Yours in Christ
    MM

    Comment by Marty McPain — November 26, 2007 @ 4:23 pm | Reply

  114. Arn, first of all, Bob Corker is most certainly not my beloved. Not that I don’t love all human beings, but calling him my beloved is going a tad far. I vehemently disagree with him in his opinions regarding women, actually. Had I been present for that discussion, I would most certainly have made my views known. Would I have deleted his comments? No. As repugnant as his viewpoints are, he stated them without profanity. Had he delved into profanity, his comments would most certainly have been amended.

    In other words, if you can make your points without using filthy language, the odds are excellent that your post will remain up.

    If you make a post of substance that contains filthy language, then the odds are good that the offending terms will be amended.

    And if you make a post that contains absolutely nothing OTHER than vulgar ad hominems…well, I’d love for you to explain to me why something like that should be left up, when it adds precisely nothing to the discussion?

    Comment by Lyssie — November 26, 2007 @ 4:25 pm | Reply

  115. “I wish I had the answers.”

    Comment by Marty

    we wish that for you too, you will find ’em later in life, be VERY sure of that

    Comment by Moxom — November 26, 2007 @ 4:27 pm | Reply

  116. 1) no, but i am fiercely pro-gay marriage, since it was a gay friend of mine that counseled me when i was suicidal.
    2) i use it as it means “picky.” seems like you’re the one who thinks about the double entendre a little too much. here’s a question for you, MM: what starts with F, ends with K, and can be really loud?
    nobody else answer, this is for her.

    Comment by Elephant Bones — November 26, 2007 @ 4:29 pm | Reply

  117. Ellie,

    are you retarded? Marty is short for Martin, a perfectly good male name.

    you are so wierd.

    MM

    Comment by Marty McPain — November 26, 2007 @ 4:33 pm | Reply

  118. ok, fair enough, lyssie. could we propose a new rule to keep namecalling to a minimum? it doesn’t add anything to the conversation, either. i think at this point, i’ve been called at least 15 different names, only one, EB, that i don’t consider rude.

    Comment by Elephant Bones — November 26, 2007 @ 4:34 pm | Reply

  119. Lyssie, by “your own beloved Bob Corker” I didn’t mean in particular you as an individual, I meant by this site, which the majority of it’s members praise him for his beliefs. I believe you are the first member of this site to admit to disagreeing with one of your supporters. I would love to see how it went if you two discussed that subject with each other.

    Comment by Arn — November 26, 2007 @ 4:36 pm | Reply

  120. is Ellie referring to me?
    if that’s the case, i’m sorry for mistaking you for a female, but marty is fairly androgynous.

    Comment by Elephant Bones — November 26, 2007 @ 4:39 pm | Reply

  121. despite the extra effort the regular lauders of this site are taking to irritate me, i am still in good spirits. we finally have an opponent we can actually talk to, rather than yell at. this is progress. evolution, if you will.

    Comment by Elephant Bones — November 26, 2007 @ 4:48 pm | Reply

  122. ok, fair enough, lyssie. could we propose a new rule to keep namecalling to a minimum?

    Well, seeing as I only pop in rarely, I don’t think it’s altogether fair for me to suddenly start setting new rules. However, I would dearly love it if we could all maintain a gentleman’s (and gentlewoman’s) agreement to keep the namecalling down to a dull roar.

    That doesn’t mean we can’t still take chips off of each other, though — we wouldn’t want to become so civil as to be drearily tedious, now, would we?😉

    Comment by Lyssie — November 26, 2007 @ 4:51 pm | Reply

  123. Elephant Boner @ this is progress. evolution, if you will.

    Only micro-evolution. Macro-EVILution doesn’t happen.

    Comment by BJ Tabor — November 26, 2007 @ 5:01 pm | Reply

  124. you’re right, evilution doesn’t happen on a big scale. EVOLUTION, on the other hand, does. sadly, people like you haven’t evolved much since the dark ages.

    Comment by Elephant Bones — November 26, 2007 @ 5:05 pm | Reply

  125. Barn, no reason to be talking until you shovel the dookie out of your troughs.

    Lyssie, I apologize for not expounding on my post; that was very foolish of me. I was thinking in the realm of all the women in bikinis and those in Hollywood, and that was on my mind, so I would obviously have idiot thoughts after watching those sinners prance about. I do think, however, that that should be the price Democrats should have to pay, men and women. Stephen Colbert, Carl Sagan, Arnie, and Hillary Clinton all ought to be put in burqas and forced to live in the dark, unless they are willing to accept Jesus in their hearts. Once again, sorry for my distorted views.

    Comment by Bob_Corker — November 26, 2007 @ 5:54 pm | Reply

  126. Stephen Colbert, Carl Sagan, Arnie, and Hillary Clinton all ought to be put in burqas and forced to live in the dark, unless they are willing to accept Jesus in their hearts.

    See, that is where our views diverge. I don’t believe that punishing people “unless” or “until” they are willing to accept Jesus in their hearts is the right approach.

    Jesus’ love isn’t the lesser of two punishments. I cannot help but feel that instead of wielding a fist, we should be extending a hand. I imagine that were I a nonbeliever, I would be much more willing to explore Christ’s teachings after meeting joyful, upstanding, compassionate Christians, as opposed to meeting angry, defensive Christians who want to punish nonbelievers.

    Comment by Lyssie — November 26, 2007 @ 6:01 pm | Reply

  127. I try to be joyful and understand with the unsaved scum who come threw here but they just get so defensive. I am mean look at Elephant Bones; he accused me of living in the Dark Ages when I pointed out a Christian Scientific fact. Still, I forgive him seven times seventy as Jesus commands.

    Comment by BJ Tabor — November 26, 2007 @ 6:07 pm | Reply

  128. amen to that, lyssie

    Comment by Elephant Bones — November 26, 2007 @ 6:09 pm | Reply

  129. Lyssie, you speak good words. I don’t think those 4 are interested in anything else other than making money off of angering Christ, however. When I see someone lost, unsure of which path to take, I try to help them. My experience from those that assault the Triune directly, however, is that they mock us, assail us, and lie others into taking false paths. Something must be done to get rid of these people, or at least remove them from the public square. You have the patience of a saint, however, which is something I can’t hope to have (lucky for me, neither can the liberals that troll here). I tend to have OCD issues that make me determined to expose those that mock God’s word, sometimes beyond reason. I don’t think, however, that we should ‘let off’ those that attack Christianity knowingly and willingly.

    Comment by Bob_Corker — November 26, 2007 @ 6:13 pm | Reply

  130. I love you, you love me,
    on your face I’ll take a pee…

    Comment by Barney the Dinosaur — November 26, 2007 @ 6:49 pm | Reply

  131. My goodness. 130 comments and I think I read about 2 that addressed Sisyphus’ post.

    Comment by ChenZhen — November 26, 2007 @ 7:13 pm | Reply

  132. “I don’t think those 4 are interested in anything else other than making money off of angering Christ,”

    If I am the Arnie you referred to, please tell me how I stand to make money from angering Christ? Your wishy washy ways and all out lies are getting quite tiresome. To us you make what you consider a statement of facts (or rules) but when one of your own disagrees with you, you suddenly meant something else. So now, please tell us ALL how you really think women should be treated, and don’t divide then into groups first, women are women, only idiots like you would try to pull that “treat these this way and treat those that way” bull.

    Comment by Arn — November 26, 2007 @ 7:48 pm | Reply

  133. Barn, your past comments have already revealed you as a drunkard, a transvestite, and a stinky gorilla. None of which I would allow in my house, and I’d euthanize the gorilla in a jiffy. At least 60% of the women I’ve SEEN would improve you tremendously if you were under their authority.

    Anyways, read my post, goosestepper. I just said that what I said was moronic, so unless you want to prove to us that you are an illiterate homocommie, be quiet. Anyways, I think that the Bible best defines gender roles. The Bible is perfect.

    As far as you making money, you’re on myspace, for one. People on myspace often do this ‘paypal’ rubbish. For two, at least half your comments are personal attacks on other people, not ideas. We come here to discuss ideas, but you come to provoke bloggers and commentators. For three, I have never actually talked with Lyssie and Lynelle, but both seem like upstanding Christian Patriots, which is more than I can say for you. For four, did you post that filthy purple dinosaur comment? Way to prove point 2, Barn.

    Sisyphus, have you considered moving out of Vermont into Kansas? I’d love to hear from someone who will have Brownback as their governor.

    Comment by Bob_Corker — November 26, 2007 @ 10:30 pm | Reply

  134. Some great points there, Bob. It’s always good to have you here.

    Comment by Psycheout — November 26, 2007 @ 10:43 pm | Reply

  135. Thanks, Psycheout. It’s nice to talk with fellow conservatives, even though all it seems we get are those from the spherofascist crowd. Oh well, they are proving themselves foolish😉

    Comment by Bob_Corker — November 26, 2007 @ 10:55 pm | Reply

  136. Yes, the Bible is perfect. You would ban Harry Potter, a book teaching children how to stand up for your friends and not be afraid of overwhelming evil; yet you put the Bible on a pedestal, despite its descriptions of rape, slavery, intolerance, oppression, incest, murder, and all that good stuff.
    Hypocrisy abounds, and its name is Christian. Jesus would be ashamed at what his message has decayed into.

    Comment by Elephant Bones — November 26, 2007 @ 10:57 pm | Reply

  137. People who choose to respond in any internet forum are often the loudest and stupidest. See Elephant Snout, Annie Lois, Jim, Moxom and Xerox (the last three are the same loser) for examples.

    You see the same thing in internet polls: Ron Paulosers are the ones who keep voting again and again. Mainly because they know they’ll lose in an actual poll that really counts.

    Comment by Psycheout — November 26, 2007 @ 10:58 pm | Reply

  138. “drunkard, transvestite, stinky gorilla, goosestepper, illitrate homocommie”
    “at least half your comments are personal attacks on other people, not ideas.”
    As Phoenix Wright would say, OBJECTION! There is clearly a contradiction here!
    This site is full of contradictory statements, but this is probably the most blatant.

    Comment by Elephant Bones — November 26, 2007 @ 11:02 pm | Reply

  139. and to claim that everyone on myspace makes money through paypal is like saying everyone who plays the lottery hits the jackpot

    Comment by Elephant Bones — November 26, 2007 @ 11:16 pm | Reply

  140. wow, can’t you just feel the love in this blogpost? gives me a warm, fuzzy feeling.

    Comment by Elephant Bones — November 26, 2007 @ 11:23 pm | Reply

  141. I’m glad that sisypus is bake. I was afraid when I herd you gus shut down.

    Comment by JOE — November 27, 2007 @ 1:41 am | Reply

  142. and to claim that any elephant man wood make any cents is like saying stupid crape.

    Comment by JOE — November 27, 2007 @ 1:42 am | Reply

  143. Excuse me the late comment……I fell asleep halfway through the discussion here (around comment 122)
    I guess that was possibly the best thing that I could do, since they had nothing to say which kind of improved the talk at all.

    Even an insomniac could be bored to sleep on this blog,
    was quite fun here, but this parody is becoming tragically DULL.

    Comment by Moxom — November 27, 2007 @ 3:20 am | Reply

  144. (re-CHRISTEN this blog to : “Blogs for those that are assuming things in the name of a president that never was”…..it would stick a bit closer to the facts)

    PsyKKKeout assumes that we are 3 people.
    Taffy assumes that Arn eats bugs
    Bob KKKorKKKer assumes that everyone with a Myspace uses Paypal
    Ednose assumes that we haven’t read his rules

    Facts: they assume too much and don’t have the wit to outdiscuss any of us.
    This was a cheap attempt to ban some of us (lol)

    Comment by Moxom — November 27, 2007 @ 3:53 am | Reply

  145. “Barn, your past comments have already revealed you as a drunkard, a transvestite, and a stinky gorilla.”

    1. I don’t drink
    2. I am not a transvestite
    3. I am not a stinky gorilla
    And who does the name calling here? You are a complete idiot and I do wish you had the nerve to come say that to my face, but since you already admitted that you are a chicken I guess that wont happen.
    I put it to you that you are a big liar, that only knows how to insult people because you don’t have the brains to discuss anything intelligently.
    And Myspace and paypal have nothing to do with each other, there is no way to make money on myspace that I have ever heard of. I work for a living, something that is probably strange to you. You insult people for a living. You can insult me all you like, it wont make you any less of an idiot. My only personal attacks as you call them are in responce to the personal attacks on me, you like to call names and make threats, but you can’t handle it if someone calls you on them.
    Psycheout: Just what are the good points he made in that line of nonsense? You are as stupid as he is. And still calling me by a girls name, your mother must be proud to have raised such an ingrate. You are all morons and chickens, and unless one of you knocks on my door to tell me otherwise that is what you will remain, not a single one of you is worth the air you breathe.
    Oops, am I gonna get a time out for doing what you guys do? You prove all of your points with insults and threats. But the visitors can’t do that back,,, you folks make me ill.

    Comment by Arn — November 27, 2007 @ 6:06 am | Reply

  146. Arn Arn Arn, why do you make the baby Jesus cry with your lies?

    Why can’t you admit your true nature and confess and accept your punishment.

    Thats’ what you want isn’t it Arn? to be punished? To get on your kness and get the Full Measure of the Love of Christ force-fed into your fat stupid face?

    Well I forgive you for your name-calling and rudness. Now accept your punishment….

    Comment by Marty McPain — November 27, 2007 @ 8:12 am | Reply

  147. Marty, that was just, well,, stupid.

    Comment by Arn — November 27, 2007 @ 8:27 am | Reply

  148. Marty Marty Marty, why do you use Jesus to promote your ignorant statements and lies?

    Why can’t you admit your true nature and confess and repent?

    Here’s a suggestion. Go read the Bible–the part with Jesus in it. You must have missed it. Then, find someone that can tell you what it really means. Given that, you should be at a point where you can understand that “the Love of Christ” is not “force-fed.” That would be a nice start.

    Comment by La Mona — November 27, 2007 @ 8:27 am | Reply

  149. Looks like La Mona just told you, Marty. You know, we on the left side (or even on the right side that are sane) have been able to make our arguments time and time again without the use of insults and hate-filled vernacular. You, on the other hand, seem incapable of doing this. And that is why you will never beat us.

    Comment by Elephant Bones — November 27, 2007 @ 8:48 am | Reply

  150. “And that is why you will never beat us.”

    no matter how much you beg for it.

    It is not I who will beat you but the Lord will punish you when you fail to heed the word of the Lord and persist in your sinfull wickedness.

    Maybe if I am lucky the Lord will act through me. He knows that I am always available.

    Comment by Marty McPain — November 27, 2007 @ 9:19 am | Reply

  151. “Maybe if I am lucky the Lord will act through me. He knows that I am always available.”

    OOOOOOhhh does that mean you’ll be the one to punish us, McPain? It’s nice to know you’ll be available for that. I’ll be waiting for you.

    Comment by Arn — November 27, 2007 @ 9:30 am | Reply

  152. @Marty

    Perhaps that is why you remain available, no? Still haven’t read that piece of the Bible I see.

    Comment by La Mona — November 27, 2007 @ 9:34 am | Reply

  153. The name of this post is “I LOVE YOU” and you can just feel all the love in every one of the comments.
    Another fine failure for the b4b team.

    Comment by Arn — November 27, 2007 @ 9:35 am | Reply

  154. I see I was right about your deviant desires.

    I will pray for your salvation.

    You should really get on your knees in the driveway or on the sidewalk and stay there for a few hours calling out to passers-by that you are a sinner and deserve to be punished.

    Comment by Marty McPain — November 27, 2007 @ 9:55 am | Reply

  155. Arn @ The name of this post is “I LOVE YOU” and you can just feel all the love in every one of the comments.

    Arn, are you blind. Of course we Christians have love. When it comes to love we Christians are full of it. When we mean love we’re not talking the taudry kind of guy-on-guy-in-women’s-clothing love you have Arn has or the girl-on-woodwind kind of love La Mona has. We’re talking TRUE love, the kind of TRUE love God has for His creation. Okay, since we Christians are only human not as pure as God’s is, but we have the same idea, thanks to Him (PRAISE)

    Not stop being such a brat Arn before Jesus sends one of His Angels down to kick your’ butt.

    Comment by BJ Tabor — November 27, 2007 @ 10:52 am | Reply

  156. BJ…perhaps you should get with Marty on that Bible study. Let us know how it goes.

    Comment by La Mona — November 27, 2007 @ 11:06 am | Reply

  157. So many sick people. It’s hard to love them all, but that is what God commands of us. I just hope they see the light and repent, before the Devil overtakes their souls.

    Put down your Marxist tracts and your Darwinist toilet paper, moonbats. Read the Bible. Is that so difficult for you to manage?

    Comment by Sisyphus — November 27, 2007 @ 11:34 am | Reply

  158. I haven’t a problem. But many do. Tell us…why is it that you struggle so?

    Comment by La Mona — November 27, 2007 @ 11:37 am | Reply

  159. “I haven’t a problem. But many do. Tell us…why is it that you struggle so?”

    Who is this addressed to?

    Comment by Sisyphus — November 27, 2007 @ 11:45 am | Reply

  160. Mona, People like Sisyphus and BJ are brainwashed by self indulgence, blinded by vanity, and just love to be grumpy hypocrites.
    Seems it is the only way for these nerds to express themselves, cause nobody anywhere in the world would take them serious.

    Comment by Moxom — November 27, 2007 @ 11:48 am | Reply

  161. You.

    Comment by La Mona — November 27, 2007 @ 11:49 am | Reply

  162. I struggle because of you, though. You sinners and deviants need ministering, and the tough love you seem incapable of accepting. If you don’t repent now, you’ll face fire eternal and damnation everlasting. It’s not a pretty picture. Trust me.

    Comment by Sisyphus — November 27, 2007 @ 11:54 am | Reply

  163. (now be grumpy, 666siphus….this is your chance,
    or try to be “funny”….showtime kiddo!!!!)

    Comment by Moxom — November 27, 2007 @ 11:58 am | Reply

  164. Sisyphus…you still don’t understand. By Christian faith, you are a deviant and sinner… Sorry to burst your bubble–again.

    Moxom: Yepyep.

    Comment by La Mona — November 27, 2007 @ 12:04 pm | Reply

  165. It is hard for some people (Sisyphus) to understand that he (shh..) is not God. I know it is hard to believe but…society has corrupted him and he is not a man of God. But he is a man of the world!!!

    Comment by Harry Potter — November 27, 2007 @ 12:08 pm | Reply

  166. I will pray for you, Moxom.

    You’re an idiot, Mona. Christian faith is the only true faith, so in embracing it I can never be a sinner.

    You’re not even a real person, Harry Potter, just an imaginary Satanist. Your words count for nothing.

    Comment by Sisyphus — November 27, 2007 @ 12:15 pm | Reply

  167. You are in denial. This is a problem just click where you are supposed to ok. Sorry and I hope you overcome this soon. Harry Potter

    Comment by Click Here — November 27, 2007 @ 12:20 pm | Reply

  168. Sisyphus, let’s try this again. Everyone is a sinner. The difference when you are a Christian is that you are “saved.” Even though you are saved, you can still screw up–something you’re quite good at, no? By embracing it, you are supposed to be working to be more “Christ-like.” But, because you are human you will never be perfect, but by being Christian, He fills your gaps.

    Are you sure you’re a Christian?

    I am. We’ve had this conversation numerous times. Do you listen?

    I’m pretty sure the person posting under “Harry Potter” is real. I can ensure you that I have more evidence on the matter than you do, Sisyphus. He says, “click here.”

    Comment by La Mona — November 27, 2007 @ 12:21 pm | Reply

  169. La Mona,

    We Christians turn our lives over to Jesus. He guides our actions now. Yes, we can sin, if we were foolish enough to think for ourselves.

    Comment by BJ Tabor — November 27, 2007 @ 12:35 pm | Reply

  170. BJ, in the Christian faith God/Jesus does not mess with free will. That’s one of the deals with Christianity–choice. It’s all up to you whether or not to listen and be logical.

    You’re a bit deluded. It’s thoughts like that one that lead to idiotic behavior at the fault of “religion.”

    Comment by La Mona — November 27, 2007 @ 12:42 pm | Reply

  171. So you are saying that you are Jesus? Just in case you were wondering since you don’t know a lot about this Christian thing. You don’t become Jesus when you are saved! And you still sin a lot. You might also refer to the bible for more information on such.

    Comment by Harry Potter — November 27, 2007 @ 12:43 pm | Reply

  172. “So you are saying that you are Jesus? Just in case you were wondering since you don’t know a lot about this Christian thing. You don’t become Jesus when you are saved! And you still sin a lot. You might also refer to the bible for more information on such.”

    Learn to read, fictional demon-conjurer.

    Comment by Sisyphus — November 27, 2007 @ 12:47 pm | Reply

  173. Wow is that a bowl of stupid that you’re eating Sissy-Man. I don’t think it would be very “christian” of you to talk to a fictional demon-conjurer. Fiction doesn’t defend itself…so I think you pretty much will lose that fight. How about you come up with an original insult seeing as that is all you do.

    Comment by Harry Potter — November 27, 2007 @ 12:53 pm | Reply

  174. Get thee behind me, Satan!

    Comment by Sisyphus — November 27, 2007 @ 12:55 pm | Reply

  175. I shall not participate in your evil act of homosexuality!!!!

    Comment by Harry Potter — November 27, 2007 @ 12:58 pm | Reply

  176. The intellect of this conversation is beyond silly by now.

    I forgive you your lack of intellect 666Siphus.
    Please build a machine with a big red knob on it to nuke the whole planet, and tell your shrink that God commanded you to do that.
    Insult as many people as possible behind your computer, you are nothing but a geek that can not face the real world (hence your paranoia for everything)

    You are the worst comedian on this planet,
    donate this blog to Chris Rock.

    Comment by Moxom — November 27, 2007 @ 1:28 pm | Reply

  177. since you are not capable of anything else but praying and/or insulting I recommend you to get a good hobby.
    I posted a free cookie recipe some time ago,
    maybe baking is something creative for you, and you can exchange cooking tips with BJ and SpanKKKout.
    (you can bake cookies in the shapes of crucifixes if that thrills you, and sell them door to door…..a good way for you to meet the real world out)side

    Comment by Moxom — November 27, 2007 @ 1:34 pm | Reply

  178. “Love the sinner and hate the sin – just like Jesus instructs. That’s my motto.

    As a Christian (Republican Baptist) I am obliged to love all of my fellow human beings, even the hell bound Liberals, but their sins stand directly in opposition to Biblical truth so I cherish the fact that I am to hate that part of them.

    That said, the Liberals deserve every horrifying, gruesome, torturous detail of the wrath of God coming their way and I welcome the opportunity to witness it.”

    Comment by Mrs. V.D. Groins-Crotchrott — November 26, 2007 @ 9:48 am

    You’re a secularist Baptist. Blasphemous. That a form of psuedo Christianity. Looks like BJ Hellboy will have some company in Hell.

    Comment by Spacebrother — November 27, 2007 @ 2:04 pm | Reply

  179. “Moxom, I deleted many of your comments that were in moderation, as they were gratuitously insulting, disgusting, and contributed absolutely nothing to the discussion. If you want to disagree with people, disagree with them. There is no need for the homophobic, belittling, and downright nasty personal attacks that you were writing.”

    Comment by Lyssie — November 26, 2007 @ 1:13 pm

    Double standard. The a$$holes who write the topic headers here use more insulting, disgusting, belittling, homophobic and racist remarks than anyone else here. So I guess it’s ok for Dicklickyphus, Psykkkeout to name a couple to be insulting pigs?

    Comment by Spacebrother — November 27, 2007 @ 2:13 pm | Reply

  180. “Get thee behind me, Satan!”

    Comment by Dicklickyphus — November 27, 2007 @ 12:55 pm

    Oh, don’t you worry. He’s behind you everyday and I believe you enjoy bending over to pick up the pitchfork.

    Comment by Spacebrother — November 27, 2007 @ 2:16 pm | Reply

  181. Once again, Marty McNugget is into S&M, BJs goin’ to Hell, Psykkkeout and Dicklickyphus are lovers and they all preach devisive hatred. Looks like the gene pool is a little low in them parts.

    Comment by Spacebrother — November 27, 2007 @ 2:21 pm | Reply

  182. La Mona @ BJ, in the Christian faith God/Jesus does not mess with free will. That’s one of the deals with Christianity–choice. It’s all up to you whether or not to listen and be logical.

    Yes La Mona. But what you are missing is we TRUE Christians use our free will to chose not to have one. That is God is what God wants. Look what human thinking and choices have got us; The Fall, The Flood, Christ executed, death camps, socialized medicine, Darwinism the list of evils goes on. Only when we decided to stand up to get down on our knees and let Christ make up our minds can we be truly good people.

    Comment by BJ Tabor — November 27, 2007 @ 2:38 pm | Reply

  183. “That is God is what God wants.”

    what the hell does that mean?

    Comment by Arn — November 27, 2007 @ 2:42 pm | Reply

  184. “That is God is what God wants.”

    what the hell does that mean?
    It means that BJ Hellboy wrote the worst sentence ever written,
    “deep and meaningless”

    Comment by Moxom — November 27, 2007 @ 2:50 pm | Reply

  185. Obviously Arn and Moxom are not cut out to be Christians.

    Comment by BJ Tabor — November 27, 2007 @ 4:47 pm | Reply

  186. Obviously Arn and Moxom are not cut out to be Christians.

    Comment by BJ Tabor — November 27, 2007 @ 4:47 pm

    Thank God for that.

    Comment by Arn — November 27, 2007 @ 5:05 pm | Reply

  187. ok, BJ, i can understand listing the flood and the crucifixion, but socialized medicine? ಠ_ಠ
    why would we have free will if god wanted us to give it away? if he was omniscient, he would have a better head for business and cut the middle man, making us his slaves from the get-go.
    also, if you act like a (insert various profanity here) in the name of god, you’re still a (same profanity as before). nobody falls for that trick anymore.
    honestly, why can’t you uberconservatives be like the mother from Carrie? then your inferior genes would stay safely out of the breeding pool.
    outrage at stupid comments follows: ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ

    Comment by Elephant Bones — November 27, 2007 @ 5:21 pm | Reply

  188. Obviously Arn and Moxom are not cut out to be Christians.

    Comment by BJ Hellboy

    Neither are you, you militant pedofascist-techno-infidel.
    Hell is full of hypocrites like you….have a nice dinner with Hitler after you die.

    Comment by Moxom — November 27, 2007 @ 5:40 pm | Reply

  189. You know BJ you are not all that up on the New Testment huh? I suppose with your mother not believing in literacy it is expectable. She couldn’t tutor you. Well I would adviced you get Hooked on Phonics and try to read those books…because I am going to let you in on something. Everyone is “cut out” to be christians. Now see you know something from the Bible. Do you like that fact? If you do, then you may refer to the KJV Bible to find a lot more.

    Comment by Harry Potter — November 27, 2007 @ 7:40 pm | Reply

  190. BJ, when you go and actually read the Bible we’ll try this conversation again. “Read” implies that you comprehend and interpret without this twisted snot you pass for “Christianity.” You may even learn that Jesus did not appreciate hypocritical behavior. The religious right of the time could tell you that…Oh yea, they were the ones that worked to get Jesus out of the way. Funny…

    Too, you fail to note the extreme good that people have done. You should get out more and try to find it. Human beings are capable of good of their own free will. (Whoa.)

    Comment by La Mona — November 27, 2007 @ 8:28 pm | Reply

  191. Matthew 5:17… the Bible supports us, Lisa.

    We are not to judge the clueless and the oppressed forced into a wrong religion. Those that knowingly and willingly incite violent deeds against Christianity, however, need to be punished. In cases of acts against the creation (sex outside of a hetersexual monogamous marriage) and the Creator (blasphemy), these offenses are so severe, they must be put to death so that the sin doesn’t spread. Murder & kidnapping are also required death sentences, although why you’d defend these people I don’t know.

    Comment by Bob_Corker — November 27, 2007 @ 8:57 pm | Reply

  192. *heterosexual

    Comment by Bob_Corker — November 27, 2007 @ 8:57 pm | Reply

  193. “Matthew 5:17… the Bible supports us, Lisa”

    Uh, what bible did you get that out of? Matthew 5:17 has absolutely nothing to do with anything you just said, I guess you never actually read it. In the future perhaps you should actually try to read a passage of the bible before you try to explain it, some of us have read it.
    Yeah, I know, you tried, anything to get in that little death thing that you are so obsessed with. Is there anyone that you don’t want to see die? You are still a sick pathetic bastard, Bobcock.

    Comment by Arn — November 27, 2007 @ 9:58 pm | Reply

  194. speaking of bibles, i remember getting kicked out of Barnes and Noble once for moving all the Bibles into the fiction section.
    totally worth it, i can get my Negima and Penny Arcade somewhere else.

    also, it’s obvious here that the liberal posters like arn, la mona, and my wizard friend Harry know more about Scripture than the fascists who would just as soon beat someone to death with a Bible than actually read it and learn that, oh sweet heavens, Jesus preached peace!
    KILL ALL THE MUSLIMS, LIBERALS, HARLOTS, HELIOCENTRISTS, HOMOSEXUALS!
    “Let us therefore follow after the things that make for peace, and things wherewith one may edify another.” – Romans 14:19
    JESUS WANTS US TO PERSECUTE AND OSTRACIZE PEOPLE BECAUSE HE SAID SO!
    “The Samaritan woman said to him, “You are a Jew and I am a Samaritan woman. How can you ask me for a drink?” (For Jews do not associate with Samaritans. Jesus answered her, “If you knew the gift of God and who it is that asks you for a drink, you would have asked him and he would have given you living water.” – John 4:9-10
    WE ARE SO AWESOME BECAUSE WE BRAG ABOUT HOW WE’RE DEVOTED TO A BOOK WE NEVER READ, GOD WILL LOVE US FOR SHOWING HEATHENS THAT WE’RE SO PIOUS!
    “And when you pray, don’t be like those people that don’t know God. They continue saying things that mean nothing. Don’t pray like that. They think that God will hear them because of the many things they say…When you fast, don’t make yourselves look sad. The hypocrites do that. Don’t be like the hypocrites. They make their faces look strange to show people that they are fasting. I tell you the truth, those hypocrites already have their full reward. So when you fast, make yourself look nice. Wash your face. Then people will not know that you are fasting. But your Father that you cannot see will see you. Your Father sees the things that are done in secret. And he will reward you.” Matthew 6:1-18

    There. In the words of your precious Bible, no less. Jesus says to stop, so stop. Wanna know why Jesus preached nonviolence? I’ll explain it, since you aren’t smart enough to get it on your own: BEING NICE TO PEOPLE WORKS. try it sometime, maybe then you’ll see that the world is going to hell, you’ve just been looking at it from the wrong perspective.

    Comment by Elephant Bones — November 27, 2007 @ 10:59 pm | Reply

  195. A god friend of mine once told me this “if you only ever look for the bad in people, that’s all you’ll ever see.” He was wise beyond his years, not to mention a truly devoted Catholic, unlike this hypocritical den of vipers.

    Comment by Elephant Bones — November 28, 2007 @ 12:21 am | Reply

  196. Good friend, not god friend. My mistake.

    Comment by Elephant Bones — November 28, 2007 @ 12:23 am | Reply

  197. “also, it’s obvious here that the liberal posters like arn, la mona, and my wizard friend Harry ”

    Elephant Bones: Even though we agree on most points here, I just want to point out to you that I don’t fall into the Liberal group. When it comes to politics I am not a Democrat, Republican, Liberal or Conservatist. What I am is a backwoods pot smoking hippie that doesn’t believe in politics at all. Politics never have and never will work. In 6000 years of recorded history there has never been a form of government that has worked. Every form of government is doomed to failure eventually. We thought we had a good one here and it lasted for over 200 years, but it is on it’s way out. There is just no way to choose a few people to lead the rest without it leading to disorder on a massive scale. The Constitution and Bill of Rights were two of the greatest works ever made for governing the people, but our current administration has made a mockery of both so that they are no longer even a part of our government. The right to free speech and freedom of the press has been replaced by censorship and unwarrented wiretapping, and with their new “homegrown terrorism” bill (HR 1955) they now made it legal for them to read our emails and censor our private conversations and blog posts online so that they can arrest anyone that writes anything that could be considered offensive to our government. AOL has dismantled two of my websites because my posts on people like Bush were deemed too harsh and bordered on open rebellion against our leaders, I find that rather amusing since we have no leaders. What we have is a punk (Bush) being led around by the nose by our Godfather (Cheney) and both of them think they are above the law. They have ruined the Republican party and they don’t care. Cheney thinks we can start world war three and come out on top and that’s just what he and his puppet want to do before their time in office is up, and at their current rate of pissing off other countries they will no doubt get their war, but it wont end the way they want it to. Our own allies are turning against us and it’s not our fault, it’s the fault of those two idiots who think war is the answer to everything, kinda like the idiots that run this site think nuking everyone is the answer to everything.
    Just like this thread here, it’s called “I love you” but it is really just another post for Sisy to brag about all the people he wants to kill,,, yep, that’s love all right.

    Comment by Arn — November 28, 2007 @ 7:22 am | Reply

  198. So the truth is out:

    ARN: “What I am is a backwoods pot smoking hippie that doesn’t believe.”

    typical liberal.

    If you don’t believe in GOD you will surely go to hell. I bet you would like that. Your skin whipped and baked till it slides off your flesh, with the imps at your feet tearing off pieces to eat.

    And then it grows back. and you are whipped again and again…

    that is your fate sinner!

    Comment by Marty McPain — November 28, 2007 @ 8:53 am | Reply

  199. Farty McLame, you sure are obseessed about torture. Obviously into S&M. Feces has more intellect than you.

    Comment by Spacebrother — November 28, 2007 @ 10:12 am | Reply

  200. There’s no place in heaven for bigots like Bob_KKKorkkker. Maybe if KKKorkkker removed the burning crucifix from his rectum, he’d heal from his mental disorder known as Conservo-Fascism.

    Comment by Spacebrother — November 28, 2007 @ 10:15 am | Reply

  201. “Obviously Arn and Moxom are not cut out to be Christians.”

    Comment by BJ Hellbound — November 27, 2007 @ 4:47 pm

    LOL……

    Coming from the authority of BJ Satanlover, I must say that he’s a tool.

    Comment by Spacebrother — November 28, 2007 @ 10:18 am | Reply

  202. “Yes La Mona. But what you are missing is we TRUE Christians use our free will to chose not to have one. That is God is what God wants. Look what human thinking and choices have got us; The Fall, The Flood, Christ executed, death camps, socialized medicine, Darwinism the list of evils goes on. Only when we decided to stand up to get down on our knees and let Christ make up our minds can we be truly good people.”

    Comment by BJ Buttpirate — November 27, 2007 @ 2:38 pm

    Actually Jesus supports Darwin and Socialised medicine. Christ was the ultimate Liberal who was persecuted by Conservo-Fasists.

    Comment by Spacebrother — November 28, 2007 @ 10:22 am | Reply

  203. “Obviously into S&M”

    what are you talking about? M&Ms? Yes I like M&Ms but I liked the old colors better than these new-fangled ones.

    “Actually Jesus supports Darwin and Socialised medicine. Christ was the ultimate Liberal who was persecuted by Conservo-Fasists.
    Comment by Spacebrother — November 28, 2007 @ 10:22 am ”

    OH please Space-Ho, that’s like saying that our glorious president George Bush supports torture and dictatorships. Re-dick-u-lus!

    Jesus wanted all men to pay for their own healthcare.

    Comment by Marty McPain — November 28, 2007 @ 10:26 am | Reply

  204. “what are you talking about? M&Ms? Yes I like M&Ms but I liked the old colors better than these new-fangled ones.”

    You know what I’m talking about naughty boy. If candy coated chocolates are you’re perversion and get you off, then more power to you.

    “OH please Space-Ho, that’s like saying that our glorious president George Bush supports torture and dictatorships. Re-dick-u-lus!

    Jesus wanted all men to pay for their own healthcare.”

    Comment by Monkey McSpank — November 28, 2007 @ 10:26 am

    I don’t remember Jesus charging money for healing the sick, giving sight to the blind, feeding the poor or raising the dead.

    Jesus is a Liberal.

    Comment by Spacebrother — November 28, 2007 @ 10:37 am | Reply

  205. “I don’t remember Jesus charging money ”

    and you were there? you saw it? There bible clearly states that there was one disciple that collected the “taxes.” those were fees for the miracles.

    dolt!

    Comment by Marty McPain — November 28, 2007 @ 11:02 am | Reply

  206. So the truth is out:

    ARN: “What I am is a backwoods pot smoking hippie that doesn’t believe.”

    typical liberal.

    nice editing there a-hole, you and everyone else who reads my comment knows that what I said was “doesn’t believe in politics” I like the way you left the rest of it out so you could write that bull about me not believing, I think if you ever told the truth about something it would kill you. However, all that torture crap you mentioned, I live in Huntington Mills PA if you ever care to come and try it, I would love to put you in your place in person.

    Comment by Arn — November 28, 2007 @ 11:06 am | Reply

  207. “I don’t know who this Arn is and I really don’t care. All I had to do was look at his profile and see that he is nothing but low class white trash. Sisyphus, you deserve better than to have that lowlife human turd come to your blog and disrespect you the way he and some of these other losers have. I will be joining Mrs. TDGC in prayer for the Lord to swoop down and smite them with something awful.

    I’m really glad you had a nice holiday!

    God Bless!”

    Lynelle

    Comment by Lynelle Bryant – USE Ministry Leader — November 26, 2007 @ 12:57 pm

    Wow. What a bitch. Praying for vengeful purposes only shows yet another Conservo-fascist psycho. Don’t forget to take your anti-depressants today.

    Comment by Spacebrother — November 28, 2007 @ 11:06 am | Reply

  208. “{And you were there? you saw it? There bible clearly states that there was one disciple that collected the “taxes.” those were fees for the miracles.

    dolt!”

    Comment by Monkey McSpank — November 28, 2007 @ 11:02 am

    Ah, so the disciples support taxes. See, now your catching on about Jesus the Liberal Christ.

    Comment by Spacebrother — November 28, 2007 @ 11:12 am | Reply

  209. “There bible clearly states that there was one disciple that collected the “taxes.” those were fees for the miracles.”

    I would really like to see where in the bible it says Jesus charged taxes to pay for miracles. I wonder, have you ever really read a single page in the bible?
    You are trying to tell this crap to people who actually DO read the bible, kinda makes you look real stupid.

    Comment by Arn — November 28, 2007 @ 11:15 am | Reply

  210. “This Arn fellow sounds like he might be one of those Branch Davidian people who lives in a hovel in the middle of nowhere and eats bugs. He has all the markings of a nut!

    Praying for him.”

    Comment by Mrs. V.D. Groins-Crotchrott — November 26, 2007 @ 12:22 pm

    Branch Davidians were Bush supporting Conservatives. It was the Clintons who smoked ’em out of their holes (or still in). Conservo-fascist Timothy McVie destroyed a Federal building in response much like the vConservo-fascist 9/11 highjackers and anthrax letter mailers.

    Comment by Spacebrother — November 28, 2007 @ 11:23 am | Reply

  211. Arn, what are you going on about? did you write those words or not? That’s when I stopped reading your drivel.

    You want a piece of me? You want a piece of me? You can’t handle me!

    Meet me at the corner of Old Kiins Road and Marsh Creek Road at 10pm tonight. Don’t be late cause I ain’t waiting long.

    Comment by Marty McPain — November 28, 2007 @ 12:30 pm | Reply

  212. Apologies, Arn, I was more using the term as a way to define the side that opposes the B4B Legion of Doom.
    Marty, I’m willing to bet you get an erection every time you write about someone getting hurt. Also, your knowledge of the Bible is astoundingly decrepit. If what you said is true, then everything Jesus stood for was a lie. If what you said is complete BS like it usually is, I have nothing to worry about. May Raptor Jesus have mercy on your soul.

    Comment by Elephant Bones — November 28, 2007 @ 12:30 pm | Reply

  213. no, you’re a liar, McVain you read further, you just wanted to cut your quote short so you could make it mean something other than what I wrote. You’re a lying bastard and you know it, and after reading what I really wrote up there, everyone else knows it too.

    Comment by Arn — November 28, 2007 @ 12:33 pm | Reply

  214. “Meet me at the corner of Old Kiins Road and Marsh Creek Road at 10pm tonight. Don’t be late cause I ain’t waiting long.”

    what did you do, google huntington mills or mapquest it maybe? There is no Old Kiins Road anywhere around here, but if you meant old koons road, I’m just a half mile up 239 on the right, if you can get there, you can get here, I don’t go out in the middle of the night for nothing, since you wouldn’t be there anyway.

    Comment by Arn — November 28, 2007 @ 12:42 pm | Reply

  215. oh yeah and wear a dress so I can take you like the woman you are…..

    Comment by Marty McPain — November 28, 2007 @ 1:01 pm | Reply

  216. i can now conclude that marty has a fetish for being physically abused by women, or preferably men dressed like women. and he calls us perverts…

    Arn, take him on his offer with the dress. it’ll add insult to his injury. also, take pictures, cause i want to see this. we’ll see why these guys need nukes to compensate for their lack of everything else.

    Comment by Elephant Bones — November 28, 2007 @ 1:23 pm | Reply

  217. Hippies vs. Fascists
    It’s time for an administrative smackdown!
    Marty McPain goes against Arn!
    who will win? who will suffer conclusive defeat?

    I don’t know about you guys, but assuming Marty doesn’t cheat and bring a gun, i got $50 on Arn

    Comment by Elephant Bones — November 28, 2007 @ 1:25 pm | Reply

  218. and for the record, Marty, Matthew was indeed a tax collector. Yes, he was an apostle. No, he did not collect money for healing. Cite in the Bible where he says that he collected fees for healing, because i read his Gospel and didn’t see anything of the sort.
    PROTIP: Reading the Cliffs Notes doesn’t count as reading the whole book. The Bible is no exception.

    Comment by Elephant Bones — November 28, 2007 @ 1:31 pm | Reply

  219. “oh yeah and wear a dress so I can take you like the woman you are…..”

    I thought being a homosexual was unchristian.

    Comment by Arn — November 28, 2007 @ 1:36 pm | Reply

  220. “I thought being a homosexual was unchristian.”
    yea, and wasn’t Marty one of the hypocrites who was BAWWWWWWing about us not being gentlemen? fighting a woman (or a man impersonating one) doesn’t seem very chivalrous.

    Give him a kidney punch for me, Arn. Preferably the left one.

    Comment by Elephant Bones — November 28, 2007 @ 1:38 pm | Reply

  221. don’t worry EB, you’re money’s safe even if he does bring a gun.

    Comment by Arn — November 28, 2007 @ 1:39 pm | Reply

  222. That’s good to know. Anyone else wanna post bets? Show your support!

    Comment by Elephant Bones — November 28, 2007 @ 1:44 pm | Reply

  223. “oh yeah and wear a dress so I can take you like the woman you are…..”

    Comment by Monkey McSpank — November 28, 2007 @ 1:01 pm

    And they alter/edit/modify/delete my responses here……….

    Comment by Spacebrother — November 28, 2007 @ 1:55 pm | Reply

  224. Oh quit your whining!

    I don’t care if you punch me or kick me! Go ahead! I can take it!

    The Lord will protect me! Your simple minds are incapable of understanding the Bible!

    Comment by Marty McPain — November 28, 2007 @ 2:10 pm | Reply

  225. “The Lord will protect me! Your simple minds are incapable of understanding the Bible!”

    Now you’re just typing to see your name on here. Everyone can tell from your comments that you have no understanding of the bible period.

    Comment by Arn — November 28, 2007 @ 2:15 pm | Reply

  226. “Give him a kidney punch for me, Arn. Preferably the left one.”

    Sorry, EB, I can’t do that, I have no real desire to hurt this poor excuse for a human physically, (well, not that bad anyway) he just needs to be humiliated the way he claims to want to humiliate others, and I wouldn’t have to hurt him to do that, he would be easy to humiliate without having to inflict any real serious pain, inflicting serious pain and killing people is what he seems to think is the answer to everything, I wont lower myself to his level, but I would have a lot of fun humiliating him while he tried to hurt me.

    FILM AT ELEVEN

    Comment by Arn — November 28, 2007 @ 2:22 pm | Reply

  227. “I don’t care if you punch me or kick me! Go ahead! I can take it!

    The Lord will protect me! Your simple minds are incapable of understanding the Bible!”

    Comment by Squirty McSmeg — November 28, 2007 @ 2:10 pm

    Mister Farty “I’ll shoot yer face off” McCheese, you would’nt know the Lord if he blew his nose in your general direction.

    Comment by Spacebrother — November 28, 2007 @ 2:22 pm | Reply

  228. Mister Farty “I’ll shoot yer face off” McCheese, you would’nt know the Lord if he blew his nose in your general direction.

    sorry to correct you here spacebrother, but that was Bobcock that said he wanted to shoot my face off, but that’s all ok now, he admitted he was chicken and just talking out his a**.

    Comment by Arn — November 28, 2007 @ 2:27 pm | Reply

  229. “As a christian woman it’s nice to know that decent men like Sisyphus, BJ, and Joe exist to carry on chivalry. God loves real men like you guys a lot more than scabbie ridden, sissy boys like Arn.

    Aside from being plain ignorant, he looks like he needs a bath and I know he needs a gasoline gargle followed by a lit match for that filthy mouth of his.

    Thank you for defending the honor of the ladies here.

    God Bless!”

    Lynelle

    Comment by Lynelle Bryant – USE Ministry Leader — November 26, 2007 @ 1:29 pm

    You must be a drug addict.

    Comment by Spacebrother — November 28, 2007 @ 2:34 pm | Reply

  230. “sorry to correct you here spacebrother, but that was Bobcock that said he wanted to shoot my face off, but that’s all ok now, he admitted he was chicken and just talking out his a**.”

    Comment by Arn — November 28, 2007 @ 2:27 pm

    Sorry Arn. These nutjobs all blend in together after a while.

    Comment by Spacebrother — November 28, 2007 @ 2:36 pm | Reply

  231. “People who choose to respond in any internet forum are often the loudest and stupidest. See Elephant Snout, Annie Lois, Jim, Moxom and Xerox (the last three are the same loser) for examples.

    You see the same thing in internet polls: Ron Paulosers are the ones who keep voting again and again. Mainly because they know they’ll lose in an actual poll that really counts.”

    Comment by Psykkkeout — November 26, 2007 @ 10:58 pm

    Ron Pauls still in the race is’nt he? Brownback mountains still out right? I thought so…….

    Comment by Spacebrother — November 28, 2007 @ 2:44 pm | Reply

  232. “oh yeah and wear a dress so I can take you like the woman you are…..”

    who keeps calling this a family friendly site?
    Is this the way family friendly sites allow the commenters they like to talk, yet would delete it if it came from someone else.

    Comment by Arn — November 28, 2007 @ 2:54 pm | Reply

  233. ok, fine, no kidney punches. nevertheless, watch out for cheap shots and concealed weapons. around B4B…never relax!

    Comment by Elephant Bones — November 28, 2007 @ 5:03 pm | Reply

  234. La Mona

    Matthew 5:17 “Did you think I had come to abolish the Law of the Prophets; I have come to fulfill it.”
    Absolutely no way around this one for literal Christians.

    Leviticus 27:29
    “No person devoted to destruction may be ransomed; he must be put to death.”

    I don’t know where you get this ‘excessive violence’ idea from.

    Comment by Bob_Corker — November 28, 2007 @ 9:15 pm | Reply

  235. it’s about time that the supposed fight would be going on. wonder how it’ll end…

    Comment by Elephant Bones — November 28, 2007 @ 11:42 pm | Reply

  236. Still misquoting the bible I see, Bobcock. If you are going to use quotes from the bible, try at least quoting it properly instead of rewriting it to suit you.
    Lev. 27:29
    None devoted, which shall be devoted of men, shall be redeemed; [but] shall surely be put to death.

    that is the real verse, which if you read the rest of the chapter, it is regarding the amount of tithes owed to the Lord, not a sentence of death. It is argued by some that this chapter indicates a call for human sacrifice, however, the message here is actually more on the sacrifice of animals in lieu of money for those who have no money.

    Mat. 5:17
    Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.

    again you misquoted, and the words you changed again changed the meaning of the verse.
    Is that really the christian way, re-write the bible to suit your own purposes?

    You are not only a liar, Bobcock, you also lie about the bible, time for you to step down from your self made pedestal and admit it, you’re just an idiot that doesn’t know a damn thing about the bible. By the way, do you have the slightest idea what those messages really are? Try reading the whole chapters next time, your understanding of the bible is nonexistant.

    Comment by Arn — November 29, 2007 @ 6:29 am | Reply

  237. it’s about time that the supposed fight would be going on. wonder how it’ll end…

    you already know the answer to that, he wasn’t there, all that was there was the road sign. Oh, and my friend that lives there had his smoker going making deer jerky.

    Comment by Arn — November 29, 2007 @ 6:34 am | Reply

  238. Corker, this is going to be hard for you to believe, but not all the Bible is literal, and not all of it is metaphoric. Shocker, no? Isn’t it amazing how the two come together? After you figure that bit out, feel free to take Arn’s advice. It may be hard, but read entire chapters at a time–they make more sense that way.

    Elephant Bones: I’m not really “liberal.” I’m more moderate. I’m Conservative when it comes to abortion, and the sort, but then I usually like what is considered “liberal” economics more. It all depends on what’s presented. And, I’m a Christian.🙂 So that helps with the tidbit of biblical knowledge. Course, it doesn’t take much here, no?

    Comment by La Mona — November 29, 2007 @ 7:41 am | Reply

  239. La Mona: You confuse me when you post here. I got used to the Christians here being demented fanatics like Bob and BJ, I am not a Christian, but I have studied religion for over 30 years, not just Christianity, but other religions as well and it’s refreshing, even if confusing, to hear sensible words coming from a Christian here, Thank you for reminding me that the real Christians are not blood thirsty fanatics. These folks use misquotes from the bible and false meanings of the bible so often that I tend to forget there are still those around that understand it’s real meaning.

    Comment by Arn — November 29, 2007 @ 8:10 am | Reply

  240. Arn,

    Why didn’t you show up? I was there waiting to give you a good bible-thumping!

    Can’t trust a non-believer my mother always said. They will lie and lie and think nothing of it.

    I will pray for your reformation.

    Comment by Marty McPain — November 29, 2007 @ 8:17 am | Reply

  241. Lol. Your welcome. I enjoy reading about other religions of the world. To spend 30 years on it, what’s your fascination? (curiosity)

    I think that many people claiming Christianity should do their best to find the original meaning/context of the verses. Some verses are completely changed when you take them from Hebrew/Greek because English just doesn’t cut it. Too, I am Christian because I think that the ideas that Christ brought are an awesome way to live, and to treat other people (love, respect, self-sacrifice in a sense, etc) and yourself (breaking the mold, standing for what you believe in). I despise how “religion” is caught in tradition and refuse to break that. Jesus was all about breaking traditions–the religious “right” hated him for it. But anywho…

    Comment by La Mona — November 29, 2007 @ 8:20 am | Reply

  242. “Why didn’t you show up? I was there waiting to give you a good bible-thumping!”

    Didn’t you read my comment? I was there, I stood outside with a friend that lives there for an hour or so while he was tending his smoker making jerky, if you don’t believe me just run over to Sun Rae’s down the road a bit and ask them, they saw me there when they left to go home at around 11:00.
    However, to give me a good bible thumping you would have to understand the bible, which you don’t. I do have to give it to you though that when you quoted the bible earlier, you actually quoted the bible unlike Bobcock who wrote his own versions of the verses to suit what he wanted to say rather than what Jesus wanted to say.
    You, at least quoted it correctly, you just misunderstood it’s meaning.

    Comment by Arn — November 29, 2007 @ 8:26 am | Reply

  243. I wrote:

    “I see you as a crookbacked, ball-less, scurvy-ridden dwarf.”

    and such people are not allowed in Church.

    and that provides us with an explanation:

    YOU ARE SO SHORT I DID NOT SEE YOU WAITING.

    Oh well, meet me there tonight but at 10:30; I have to be somewhere else earlier

    Comment by Marty McPain — November 29, 2007 @ 8:45 am | Reply

  244. La Mona: This may sound kinda strange, but my fascination with religion actually comes from my fascination with science. There are so many contradictions between the two that at first you would think the two were totally exclusive of each other. But on deeper understanding of both religion and science, you start to see where the two can actually compliment each other. Very early science had little to support itself because of the limited understanding man had of the universe and religion helped to fill the gaps, although science has disproven many things said in the bible, (such as the flat earth theory, or the thought that the earth does not move) it has also served to support many other things that were written in the bible (such as scientific evidence pointing to the fact that there was indeed a great flood around the time of Noah, and evidence of the existence and destruction of Sodom and Gomorra)
    The bible has been shown to be historically correct, but that doesn’t change my belief that the religious aspects of it are still based on men’s fears and need to have faith in something. Being historically correct does not necessarily make the supernatural aspects of the bible just as believable.
    Case in point here: The Gods of mythology. The main resource for mythology and the Gods (Poseidon, Hades, Zues, etc.) lies in the writings of Homer, a poet. Yet people believed in these Gods and worshipped them just as people worship the God of Abraham. We can not just disclaim the existence of these Gods any more than we can disclaim the existence of the God of the bible, because the writings about these Gods are also historically correct. So science would also have to support these as well as the bibles claims. And this is true of other religions as well, their beliefs are all based on factual history, but their explanations of the supernatual varies from one area to another. Even the American Indians based their religious beliefs on their own history and the Spirits that guided their forefathers.

    Comment by Arn — November 29, 2007 @ 9:00 am | Reply

  245. Ok Marty, now you’re just being stupid again. I am not a Dwarf, and you are not in Pennsylvania. Would you like me to post your IP address here and tell you exactly where the computer is that you are posting from? I can do that, if you like I can post the IP addresses of everyone that posts to this site, however, I believe the moderators would just delete them if I did since that would be a direct violation of your privacy, but if that’s what it would take to get you to stop lying then I will do it.

    [Ed Note: I know you wouldn’t do that though, since you’re a nice fellow who prefers to follow the rules. If you post other people’s email or ip addresses, you will very likely be permanently banned. And we wouldn’t want that, would we?]

    Comment by Arn — November 29, 2007 @ 9:05 am | Reply

  246. YOU ARE SO SHORT I DID NOT SEE YOU WAITING.

    I am kinda short, but my friend is like about 6’3″ or 6’4″ didn’t you see him either?

    Comment by Arn — November 29, 2007 @ 9:06 am | Reply

  247. [Ed Note: I know you wouldn’t do that though, since you’re a nice fellow who prefers to follow the rules. If you post other people’s email or ip addresses, you will very likely be permanently banned. And we wouldn’t want that, would we?]

    Of course I wouldn’t do that, but you could have waited a bit before saying that, I wanted him to think I would just to get him to tell the truth for once. Now he’ll never tell the truth.

    Comment by Arn — November 29, 2007 @ 9:51 am | Reply

  248. I always tell the truth. What you say or do has no effect on me. The Lord is my savior and protector.

    Even though I would be seared with a red-hot branding iron and have my skin sliced with razors, I would still praise the Lord!

    You, on the other hand, are obviously morally and physically destitute.

    Comment by Marty McPain — November 29, 2007 @ 10:03 am | Reply

  249. I always tell the truth.
    Comment by Martina McSpank

    That’s your biggest lie until now.

    Comment by Moxom — November 29, 2007 @ 10:34 am | Reply

  250. I always tell the truth. What you say or do has no effect on me. The Lord is my savior and protector.

    you always tell the truth? then where were you last night, you definately weren’t anywhere near here as you said, but if you can tell me what color my friends house is and how big his smokehouse is I may give you the benefit of the doubt, it’s the closest house to the intersection of koons and old marsh. And is his smokehouse brick, metal or wood?

    “You, on the other hand, are obviously morally and physically destitute.”

    This, of course, is another lie. You are morally wrong in almost everything you say, and as for being physically destitute (whatever the hell that means) had you shown up last night you would have found that I am in no way suffering physically.
    You even lie about what the bible says, not by misquoting it as Bobcock does, but by giving totally different meanings to the words that are written in it.

    You need to forget about me and try to convince other people, I already know who and what you are, and an honest Christian isn’t it.

    Comment by Arn — November 29, 2007 @ 10:48 am | Reply

  251. Monkey McSpank is just a troll. Obviously he has way too much time on his hands while still living with his Mama McSpank as a 40 year old.

    Comment by Spacebrother — November 29, 2007 @ 1:17 pm | Reply

  252. For Matthew 5:17: What did Jesus come to do?

    For Leviticus 27:29 : Leviticus 27:29

    Still think I’m misquoting the Bible, Kepling?

    Still think that atheist scum such as yourself can say who’s a Christian and who didn’t? Don’t you DARE say that I’m not a Christian, you filthy vermin. I’m abiding by the Bible; it’s not my pulpit. I am nothing more than a servant of God, same as other conservative Christians.

    Still think that you, who has started more personal attacks on this board than anyone else (“Come and get me!”, have the right to say who’s peaceful? You missed my point of counting the ‘you’s in your paragraph, D.A.

    Some of your comments are sensible, even though I may disagree with them. You have the right to voice your opinion. But you should not have the right to instigate attacks on other users. Are you even able to recognize which comments are innocuous and which ones are real?

    Comment by Bob_Corker — November 29, 2007 @ 3:18 pm | Reply

  253. Yes, I see the page, item number 12 purports to be Mat. 5:17, but it too is misquoted, Mat. 5:17 says “Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.” that is similart to your version, but still different.

    However, your version of Lev. 27:29
    ‘No person devoted to destruction may be ransomed; he must be put to death.”

    is quite different from the real bibles version (You are probably the only one here who reads a bible that was written in the 1970s) the real Lev 27:29 says
    “None devoted, which shall be devoted of men, shall be redeemed; [but] shall surely be put to death.”

    the word destruction is not there at all, and once again, this whole chapter is on paying tithes to the Lord, and the long accepted meaning here is that he was speaking of stock to be sacrificed, and that “devoted of men” roughly translates into “offered by men” However there are still a few points of veiw on this that are debated by religious scholars, but I’m sure you don’t qualify as a religious scholar, you don’t even read the right bible, the new world translation has changed so many things from the original that it’s not even the bible anymore.

    Comment by Arn — November 29, 2007 @ 5:05 pm | Reply

  254. by the way, I haven’t started attacks on this site, you folks just don’t like the way I respond to the attacks on me, all attacks on others here were actually started by the people that run this site, if you like I can go to the beginning of every thread and show the first attack from each one, and over 90% of them would be by the members here not the visitors. Even the original posts here are often attacks on others (often, I think I meant almost always)

    Comment by Arn — November 29, 2007 @ 5:12 pm | Reply

  255. Oops, I didn’t realize that Leviticus 27:29 was from the New International Version UK. My bad.

    But, the quotation you cite for Matthew 5:17 is basically a paraphrase of what I just said.

    Thank you for being reasonable on this post🙂

    Comment by Bob_Corker — November 29, 2007 @ 5:18 pm | Reply

  256. Arn, did you actually take my threat seriously? It was a little fun at your expense. Unless you trespass on my property without permission or come in my church, I won’t lay a finger on you. I don’t speak for Marty, however.

    Comment by Bob_Corker — November 29, 2007 @ 5:19 pm | Reply

  257. It was a little fun at your expense.

    threatening to shoot someones face off is fun????

    You are truly morbid, Bob

    Comment by Moxom — November 29, 2007 @ 5:25 pm | Reply

  258. But, the quotation you cite for Matthew 5:17 is basically a paraphrase of what I just said.

    Yes, that’s what I said, those were quite similar, they were both direct quotes, just from different bibles, (I use KJV) but our interpretations of those verses differ greatly, and your interpretations of most parts of the bible are just too far off base for you to even be reading the same bible.

    [Ed Note: Hey, Arn. You might want to learn how to set off text you are quoting so it doesn’t look like you’re talking to yourself. Check out the rules page and learn how to use italics or blockquotes. I wrote that page to help people become better commenters. This is not a criticism, just a helpful suggestion. Jesus loves you!]

    Comment by Arn — November 29, 2007 @ 5:28 pm | Reply

  259. But why would God create a moral law only to have it abolished? That would be just like Lindsey Lohan ‘suddenly’ deciding that she should wear a buisness suit instead of an Abercromie & Fitch bra and 3-inch slamball shorts. Ceremonial laws would understandably be abolished, since God is disgusted at his attempt to create a ‘chosen people’ just as the people that bought James Dean’s Porsche were upset that the ‘chosen car’ kept falling on their legs. But God would never be one to say ‘Oops’. God would never get caught with his pants down, because God hates masturbation. And every time you masturbate, He kills a kitten.

    Comment by Bob_Corker — November 29, 2007 @ 6:16 pm | Reply

  260. “…….God hates masturbation. And every time you masturbate, He kills a kitten.”

    Comment by Bob_KKKorkkker — November 29, 2007 @ 6:16 pm

    Looks like the kitten population is going extinct because of you KKKorkkker. And they said you’d go blind.

    Comment by Spacebrother — November 30, 2007 @ 12:34 pm | Reply

  261. “It breaks my heart that while I, and those of the Blessed like Senator Brownback, are enjoying our eternal repose in bliss at the pedestal of God, the treefrogs and atheists will choke back tears of pain and anguish in a Hell created of their own iniquitous sedition.”

    Matthew 6:1-2
    Matthew 6:1-2
    Matthew 6:1-2
    Matthew 6:1-2
    Matthew 6:1-2
    Matthew 6:1-2
    Matthew 6:1-2

    READ IT. MEMORIZE IT. FOLLOW IT.

    Comment by a TRUE Christian — December 4, 2007 @ 9:58 am | Reply

  262. “Unless you trespass on my property without permission or come in my church, I won’t lay a finger on you.”

    *sighs* Whatever happened to Christian tolerance and loving thy neighbor? To welcoming the lost sheep back to the fold? Does anyone still follow the words of Christ these days?

    Comment by a TRUE Christian — December 4, 2007 @ 10:00 am | Reply

  263. “I’m abiding by the Bible; it’s not my pulpit. I am nothing more than a servant of God, same as other conservative Christians.”

    Um, Bob? Hate to burst your bubble here, but Jesus was a radical. He advocated giving everything you have to the poor–not just a few pennies now and then. He believed in forgiveness and turning the other cheek, rather than condemning and seeking revenge. If you don’t follow these words of Christ as closely as the others, you are not serving God, only yourself.

    Just think about it.

    Comment by a TRUE Christian — December 4, 2007 @ 10:03 am | Reply

  264. “*sighs* Whatever happened to Christian tolerance and loving thy neighbor? To welcoming the lost sheep back to the fold? Does anyone still follow the words of Christ these days?”

    Um, I’d rather not have an unrepentant homosexual or atheist in my church. God shouldn’t be disrespected by them. He shouldn’t be direspected by blind people, either. They had to poke their eyes out since the eyes caused the person to sin so much, and God would rather not have defiled bodies in His church.

    “Um, Bob? Hate to burst your bubble here, but Jesus was a radical.”

    I’m sure your atheist friends would agree. This is always strange in that we are agreeing with the atheists that Jesus was a conservative, but He was. The tax collectors were the greatest sinners in His eyes. That’s all there is to it.

    “He advocated giving everything you have to the poor–not just a few pennies now and then.”

    Only if they are Christians. Giving money to an atheist is moronic, since he’ll just giggle at you and buy some beer.

    “He believed in forgiveness and turning the other cheek, rather than condemning and seeking revenge.”

    I’m sure he wasn’t talking about those railing against His word.

    “If you don’t follow these words of Christ as closely as the others, you are not serving God, only yourself.”

    I hate Benny Hinn. That man makes a mockery of Christianity. True Christians get healed alone and don’t brag about it to the world. Other than SOME televangelists, I can’t see how living by the Word leads to personal profit in this life.

    Comment by Bob_Corker — December 4, 2007 @ 9:48 pm | Reply

  265. Um, I’d rather not have an unrepentant homosexual or atheist in my church.

    Amen, Brother Corker, amen.

    Comment by Psycheout — December 4, 2007 @ 9:58 pm | Reply

  266. “That said, the Liberals deserve every horrifying, gruesome, torturous detail of the wrath of God coming their way and I welcome the opportunity to witness it.”

    That sounds nothing like love.

    “The looney short-statured freak who lives in a hole in the ground insulted our beautiful, humble, God-fearing Sisyphus.”

    Humble? HUMBLE? Sisyphus doesn’t even know the meaning of the word. He’s too busy rubbing shoulders with Sister Bertha Better-Than-You and a wife who’s half his age (Ewwww!!! ) instead of paying attention to the priest.

    Comment by a TRUE Christian — December 4, 2007 @ 11:08 pm | Reply

  267. “*sighs* Whatever happened to Christian tolerance and loving thy neighbor? To welcoming the lost sheep back to the fold? Does anyone still follow the words of Christ these days?”

    Um, I’d rather not have an unrepentant homosexual or atheist in my church. God shouldn’t be disrespected by them. He shouldn’t be direspected by blind people, either. They had to poke their eyes out since the eyes caused the person to sin so much, and God would rather not have defiled bodies in His church.

    Hey genius, remember the parable of the lost sheep? God wants all sinners to return to Him and be saved. It’s in the Bible. Read it for once, instead of using it as a paperweight.

    “Um, Bob? Hate to burst your bubble here, but Jesus was a radical.”

    I’m sure your atheist friends would agree. This is always strange in that we are agreeing with the atheists that Jesus was a conservative, but He was. The tax collectors were the greatest sinners in His eyes. That’s all there is to it.

    Yep, even the Pharisees–the conservative religious leaders of the day–knew Jesus was one of them! Look at how often they agree! St. Matthew was a tax collector. Read The Bible!!

    “He advocated giving everything you have to the poor–not just a few pennies now and then.”

    Only if they are Christians. Giving money to an atheist is moronic, since he’ll just giggle at you and buy some beer.

    Jesus did not specify. Not to mention that Christianity didn’t even exist until after His Resurrection.

    “He believed in forgiveness and turning the other cheek, rather than condemning and seeking revenge.”

    I’m sure he wasn’t talking about those railing against His word.

    Then what “enemies” was he talking about?

    “If you don’t follow these words of Christ as closely as the others, you are not serving God, only yourself.”

    I hate Benny Hinn. That man makes a mockery of Christianity. True Christians get healed alone and don’t brag about it to the world. Other than SOME televangelists, I can’t see how living by the Word leads to personal profit in this life.

    You are making the first step towards true enlightenment. May Christ guide you to the light of His infinite wisdom.

    Comment by a TRUE Christian — December 4, 2007 @ 11:21 pm | Reply

  268. “Suffice it to say that most of my family does not agree with our political and religious views.”

    Looks like most of is smarter than you.

    “I love my family, but you are my online family. I love you all, even the willfully Hellbound among you (like Spacebrother and Tyler Durden, for starters).”

    Sisyphus @ 7:59 am

    I think you’re confusing me for BJ Imagointohellbor and Marty McCheese, but thanks for the gesture of love none-the-less. There’s hope for you yet, even if you are currently misguided.

    Comment by Spacebrother — December 13, 2007 @ 1:11 pm | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: