Blogs 4 Brownback

November 19, 2007

Dumbing It Down

The Average B4B Critic - A MoronThe quality of the writing skills of our commenters, especially the liberal and perverted critics who come here to rant, utilizing incomprehensible spelling and atrocious grammar, is dragging our blog down. At right is what we consider to be the median (average Joe) in the vast pool (or toilet bowl) of our dissenting commenters.

To put it kindly, they’re dribbling morons. Just read a few of their incomprehensible and horribly misspelled rants and try to find the coherent thought. It’s harder than solving a trick puzzle in an advanced copy of Where’s Waldo in which the striped-shirted, hat-wearing fellow is completely absent. One simply cannot find it.

When I read some of the comments from those who rail against us, I just shake my head. Do these people stand upright? Do they have opposable thumbs? Do their brains somehow detach and wander off on their own? Are their remaining brains stored in jars? I don’t know how Sam (our moderator) can deal with you folk. Honestly. You guys belong in a zoo. Do you sleep on straw and roll around in your own filth? Do you stand on four legs or two? Seriously.

DunceWe would appreciate very much if commenters would at least familiarize themselves with basic middle school (junior high) vocabulary and grammatical skills. It’s not asking that much, is it? If you were born in a barn, have no teeth, never read an entire book (esp The King James Bible), can’t think of anything to write but leftist talking points, please don’t bother.

It wasn’t always this way. B4B had a bright beginning and a shining potential for the future. What with Sisyphus’ popular science posts and Psycheout’s compelling political reporting, B4B was at the summit of intellectual endeavor, the pinnacle of editorial and relevant commentary, a sparkling jewel in the crowded and polluted blogosphere. The stage was set for vibrant and thoughtful discussion.

Here’s where we were, before some of you more typical and brainless morons started commenting here:

College (Postgrad)

And then along came the evolutionists, the global warming zealots, the videogame junkies, the furries, the feminazis, the perverts, the atheists, the secular humanists, the hordes of brainwashed, braindead, liberal hippie pondscum traitors with diarrhea of the mouth and vacancy of the brain to vomit their vile, dyspeptic, moronic, rancorous, perverse filth here in our comment threads day after day after day.

The mongol hordes seem to think they’re winning something by pooping their filth here every day. Well, it would seem that while they are winning no arguments, they are certainly succeeding in dumbing down the quality of the once vibrant discourse that was engaged in here.

Here’s what B4B is rated now (go ahead, try it for yourself), thanks to the idiocy of you braindead morons who track in here to only to complain and spew nonsense (especially those amazingly thick 4 chan folk, also known as lamers):

High School Rating

And I can see where this is headed. Now that we’ve got adult babies and other sick perverts joining the anime-liberal-videogame-homo-commie alliance, our rating is going to drop right into the sewer.

Is there an amoeba reading level? I don’t know and don’t care to know. But I distinctly see this in our future, unless we do something quick.

Elementary School Rating

Small wonder that day after day I see this same comment:

I couldn’t understand some parts of this article, but it sounds interesting.

That’s your average liberal trying to be polite, I guess. Saying nothing while revealing everything. I keep deleting it, hoping the mindless, unthinking zombies that keep posting it will just go away. But they keep coming back.

Unless something is done, I will be reduced to writing like this:

Dick and JaneB4B Voter’s Guide (A Primer)

See Hillary run. See Hillary hate. She hates America? Why? Hillary is a feminazi. Hillary is a traitor.

Run, Hillary, run. Run home, Hillary. You smell. Scrub, scrub, scrub. It won’t wash. Spin, spin, spin. It won’t fly.

Poor Hillary! Poor America.

See Jane. Jane is smart. Smart, smart, smart. She wrote in “Sam.” Sam he is, not Sam I am. Jane is a smart voter. Vote, Jane, vote.

She wrote “B-r-o-w-n-b-a-c-k.” She wrote it herself. She wrote with great care. See how neatly she writes! She wrote it on her ballot. Good for you Jane. Jane is no liberal. Dumb, dumb, dumb. Jane is a conservative. Smart, smart, smart.

Jane loves America. Love, love, love. So should you. That’s why she votes. Her husband votes too. Vote, vote, vote. He taught Jane how.

Now run home, Jane. Run, Jane, run. Time to cook dinner. Dick will be home soon. Cook, cook, cook. Good girl, Jane. Life is good. So is dessert.

Drooling IdiotAnd still one of you ‘tards will pipe in and say:

Very interesting. I want to hear more.

I couldn’t understand it, but it sounds interesting.

I don’t know, it just sounds like a crazy idea for me!

Seriously people, learn yourself some education, get in some book learning and think before you dribble off at the mouth and embarrass yourselves and us. The question I really want answered is: is our commenters learning?

Review: For those of you who didn’t understand all those big words the first time, here is a quick review: Past, Present, Future, and Primer. Now wipe off the drool and try to leave a comment that contains a series of words that are spelled correctly, follow the basic rules of grammar, and make sense as a whole. Be sure to actually read it before you press submit. If it bored you to tears or made no sense whatsoever or contained leftist talking points, do not press that button.

— Psycheout

38 Comments »

  1. Hate to break this to you but the comment “I couldn’t understand some parts of this article, but it sounds interesting.” is actually spam. I get it several times a month. Oh well.

    Comment by Craig Price — November 19, 2007 @ 5:49 pm | Reply

  2. Learn to treat people with respect and you will be respected a little bit more.
    Since you spread hatred you will receive hateful comments.
    Since you can not look beyond the piece of wood nailed to your skull, the only thing you will see is the same old piece of wood over and over again, and it won’t get any more beautiful, it might even decay and grow uglier.

    Love is the answer,
    learn to love before you start to complain again (even about bad writing, for even a “genius” like you, Psycheout can misspell his own nickname (isn’t it, you don’t have to thank me for pointing that out to you a while ago).

    And finally….”learn yourself education” is bad grammar.
    maybe you might enjoy some education in the future as well.

    Greetings from a “barbarian” who speaks 17 languages.

    Jim Reswati

    Comment by Jim — November 19, 2007 @ 5:56 pm | Reply

  3. “It wasn’t always this way. B4B had a bright beginning and a shining potential for the future. What with Sisyphus’ popular science posts and Psycheout’s compelling political reporting, B4B was at the summit of intellectual endeavor, the pinnacle of editorial and relevant commentary, a sparkling jewel in the crowded and polluted blogosphere. The stage was set for vibrant and thoughtful discussion.”

    I guffawed. Terribly.

    Either way, this entry actually illustratesa successful parody in several locations, unlike the entry that claimed to parody liberals. However, This is all nullified by the fact that this whole blog is in fact, a parody.

    Comment by Armand Jean du Plessis de Richelieu — November 19, 2007 @ 6:01 pm | Reply

  4. Just did your test with two of your pages:
    You have junior high school level,
    congratulations !!!

    Comment by Jim — November 19, 2007 @ 6:04 pm | Reply

  5. I put it to you that you are the parody, Cardinal Richelieu.

    Furthermore, I also put it to you that you are dead.

    So much for your opinions. At least your grammar seems passable. Your spelling at times needs work though. You get a C.

    Comment by Psycheout — November 19, 2007 @ 6:22 pm | Reply

  6. “Furthermore, I also put it to you that you are dead.”

    (he is not really there, Psycheout, you are speaking to his holographic image)

    Comment by Jim — November 19, 2007 @ 6:32 pm | Reply

  7. And finally….”learn yourself education” is bad grammar.
    maybe you might enjoy some education in the future as well.

    Perhaps I should introduce you to irony sometime, Jim. Apparently you haven’t met.

    And you are belaboring the point about my “misspelling” my name. I did thank you. And I corrected it.

    You know very well that a typo is different than a monkey who consistenly cannot spell to save his life, so you are arguing from bad faith as usual. But you do get at least a B for your spelling and grammar.

    Comment by Psycheout — November 19, 2007 @ 6:39 pm | Reply

  8. I guess Irony lives next door to Parody in your hometown.

    Comment by Jim — November 19, 2007 @ 6:52 pm | Reply

  9. […] I’m referring to my other digs, B4B (Blogs 4 Brownback).  In Dumbing It Down, I examine B4B’s past, present, and potential future, and it’s not pretty.  The […]

    Pingback by Commenters Are Getting Dumber « Blogs 4 Conservatives — November 19, 2007 @ 7:18 pm | Reply

  10. I couldn’t understand some parts of this article, but it sounds interesting.

    [Ed Note: Repeating that a couple hundred times was very useful. Thank you so very much. I didn’t really understand what you were trying to say, but it sounded really dull and tedious.]

    Comment by S — November 19, 2007 @ 7:20 pm | Reply

  11. I’m sorry psycheout, but you rank as one of the dumbest of the dumb here, perhaps you should learn you some education. Sisyphus writing articles on science is like a two year old writing an essay on growing old.

    My education and my knowledge greatly surpasses those of everyone I have seen writing for this site so far, Sisyphus’ knowledge of science is totally non-existant, yet you say he writes good science blogs. How come we haven’t seen any of his “good” science blogs? He doesn’t even believe in science.

    As for the level of intelligence in the commenters here, even the stupidest of the comments by visitors here have still shown more intelligence than the writers, simply because they have enough sense to know that the crap you folks write makes no sense at all.

    You can, and in all probability will, say something now to insult me, but that is fine, an insult from you folks should really be considered a compliment, and those are always appreciated, no matter what the source.
    Just keep on being stupid, that’s what you are best at.

    Comment by Arn — November 19, 2007 @ 7:26 pm | Reply

  12. And yet you just can’t get enough of us. You visit here every day, multiple times per day. Why is that, Arn?

    I hope it is therapeutic for you or that we in some way help to make you feel better about yourself.

    I don’t know why you hang around us stupid folks. Don’t you have a smart politically correct blog you’d rather be visiting?

    Of course not. You love B4B. You can’t get enough of it. Admit it. And then ask yourself why? Or don’t. You may not like what you find.

    Comment by Psycheout — November 19, 2007 @ 7:34 pm | Reply

  13. Furthermore, Arn, since we’re on the subject, do you realize that you have clocked in more than 160 comments here at B4B in just over a month (since Oct 2, 2007)? That’s more than me, and I work here. It seems like you have a lot invested in this blog.

    I really don’t have a problem with that. I’m not attacking you or making fun of you. I just find it curious.

    You consistently attack Sisyphus, Sam and myself yet keep coming back for more. I personally think you’re an okay guy, perhaps misguided and wrong on the issues, but find it fascinating that you make a second home at a website you claim to despise everything about.

    Weird.

    Comment by Psycheout — November 19, 2007 @ 7:42 pm | Reply

  14. No, I already know why, stupidity amuses me, and I find this site very amusing, what can I say, I learn something new every day, and every day here I see levels of ignorance that I have never seen anywhere else, that in itself makes it worth coming back.

    Perhaps I shouldn’t continue to comment since anything that requires any thought just goes right through your tiny little brains and never registers, but somewhere in the back of my mind I keep thinking that maybe one day one of you will actually retain some of what is said in truth here and become a smarter person for it. (yeah, right, like you folks are the least bit interested in the truth)

    Anyway, it’s fun to play with those that are intellectually challenged, so to speak.

    [Ed Note: Is that really true? So did you like playing with bugs and tearing off their wings as a child? This is a perverse thrill to make yourself feel smart? Amusement is one thing, but unwarrented feelings of self-superiority is something entirely different. If that is truly what you think you get out of this, perhaps you should go see a therapist. You’ve got issues. Maybe I misread you or you aren’t being clear. If it’s an ego trip and all about self-aggrandizement, wow, seriously, go talk to someone.]

    Comment by Arn — November 19, 2007 @ 7:45 pm | Reply

  15. “perhaps misguided and wrong on the issues,”

    This describes you, not me.

    Comment by Arn — November 19, 2007 @ 7:47 pm | Reply

  16. “I put it to you that you are the parody, Cardinal Richelieu.

    Furthermore, I also put it to you that you are dead.”
    Thank you! Finally you googled it. Sheesh, took you long enough. Gods. Interesting that you chose that phrase.
    I am none other than Ron Higgins, professional Cardinal Richelieu impersonator.

    “You know very well that a typo is different than a monkey who consistenly cannot spell to save his life”
    And yet my few occasional typos are made a special matter of in your comment. Also, “consistently” has two t’s.

    Comment by Armand Jean du Plessis de Richelieu — November 19, 2007 @ 8:03 pm | Reply

  17. And I put it to you, Psycheout, that that is not your real name, either.
    Am I right? Do I win a prize?

    Comment by Armand Jean du Plessis de Richelieu — November 19, 2007 @ 8:05 pm | Reply

  18. “Anyway, it’s fun to play with those that are intellectually challenged, so to speak.”

    HAHAHA! You are one to speak, Arn. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAA!!! You are pretty much the most gullible person I know. You have no reason to be spending time here, yet from what I’ve observed, you seem to feel very, very lonely, so you do come here. Anyone with a Myspace is automatically suspicious, and I think I’ve confirmed this! Just WOW!

    Comment by Bob_Corker — November 19, 2007 @ 9:05 pm | Reply

  19. Since we’re on the subject, I’m going to ask a stupid question: Who is Ed Note? Reveal yourself!

    [Ed Note: I suspect if you investigate the B4B Team page, you might figure it out. Hint: I was quoted in the Raw Story profile.]

    Comment by ChenZhen — November 19, 2007 @ 10:42 pm | Reply

  20. “Anyone with a Myspace is automatically suspicious”

    jerry [Falwell]
    Republican Party (White Christian Males United)
    Reverend Fred [Phelps] (DEMOCRAT)
    Pat Robertson
    BROWNBACK08

    The last one is the best, of course.

    [Ed Note: How many times do I have to ask you people to embed your darn links? #1 is deceased, #2 is who knows who cares, #3 is a democrat, #4 is the guy who just endorsed RINO Rudy Giuliani, #5 is a campaign website. What do any of these prove? It’s a politicial campaign, idiot. Do you really think the candidates just hang out on myspace making myspace friends? Please don’t waste my time like this following your stupid links. Thanks. In the future I’m just going to delete lists of links that go nowhere and aren’t explained. It’s really not worth my time, so-called Cardinal.]

    Comment by Armand Jean du Plessis de Richelieu — November 19, 2007 @ 11:12 pm | Reply

  21. Interesting – So, where you actually TRYING to get people to write repsonses by telling them not to bother writing repsonses, or do you really not want responses any more?

    If it is the first, then this is your most shameless act of pandering for an arguement yet: if it is the second, then you are basically putting your own blog out of business by discouraging people from reading it.

    I know which one my money is on.

    Comment by indyandy — November 19, 2007 @ 11:15 pm | Reply

  22. [Ed Note: I suspect if you investigate the B4B Team page, you might figure it out. Hint: I was quoted in the Raw Story profile.]

    Well, shoot. lol

    Comment by ChenZhen — November 19, 2007 @ 11:46 pm | Reply

  23. indyandy: another brainless idiot who cannot comprehend what he reads.

    So, where you actually TRYING to get people to write repsonses by telling them not to bother writing repsonses, or do you really not want responses any more?

    For idiots like you who never add anything to the discussion, I prefer you choose door #2. Don’t let it hit you on the behind on your way out.

    Comment by Psycheout — November 20, 2007 @ 12:01 am | Reply

  24. I was merely providing links to myspaces of prominent Christian extremists as a form of mildly humorous response to a statement by another commenter, that’s all.

    Comment by Armand Jean du Plessis de Richelieu — November 20, 2007 @ 12:21 am | Reply

  25. I think Sam just really hates those unembedded links. Perhaps you should try embedding them next time. That way people know where they’re being directed and what to expect when they get there.

    It’s actually a really good idea. Don’t make Sam mad!

    Comment by Psycheout — November 20, 2007 @ 1:07 am | Reply

  26. If we played “Spot the loonie” we would certainly have Ednose (Sam) standing in the center of the spotlight. This site provides some brilliant amusement.

    Comment by Jim — November 20, 2007 @ 5:13 am | Reply

  27. “Don’t make Sam mad!”

    Lol, as if he wasn’t mad already.

    Comment by Jim — November 20, 2007 @ 5:18 am | Reply

  28. Why are you losers still wasting time on Brownback, he cut and run! Rudi is going to be your next president. Get used to it.

    Comment by 2008! — November 20, 2007 @ 6:12 am | Reply

  29. “Anyone with a Myspace is automatically suspicious”

    Does that include all of your buddies over at your twin site, Republican Faith? WhoDat, Yancy, Mcgregor, Brother Bear, Jodie, june and Mabel all have myspace pages, and I assume you probably do too, but of course you wont admit it, will you.

    Comment by Arn — November 20, 2007 @ 6:26 am | Reply

  30. the dumbing down probably has something to do with recent threads;
    this site generally generates anger from whoever it is criticizing, (eg people who know that your fundamentalism is actually alienating regular Christians from the rest of the population, people who believe the constitution is more important than the countries latest war, people who know Darwin was actually a devout Christian-most scientists of the era were clergyman..etc-any who I’m done flaming)

    the recent increase in the demographic of
    “evolutionists, the global warming zealots, the videogame junkies, the furries, the feminazis, the perverts, the atheists, the secular humanists, the hordes of brainwashed, brain dead, liberal hippie pondscum traitors”

    is probably because of the threads openly discriminating gamers, evolution, global warming, furries(that one was justified I’ll admit), and the general groups you make an effort to offend. It is the given right of every one of these people to defend their views. I don’t want to discriminate but many bloggers decide to; vomit the word desu 10 million times or send a hyper link to some pornography website, as a way to defend their view. They’re ruining the credibility of people trying to properly criticize the thread and its extremist views, its also the likely reason for drop in reading level

    PS- the forefathers were technically libertarians, are you calling them traitors?😛

    Comment by Soc. Libertarian — November 20, 2007 @ 7:55 am | Reply

  31. “For idiots like you who never add anything to the discussion, I prefer you choose door #2. Don’t let it hit you on the behind on your way out.”

    As much as I tend to disagree – &, usually, cringe – at your stance on most of the issues that you address here, at least they are actual, honest-to-gosh issues, and therefore worthy of my attention. But, if the best that you can do from here on out is to write articles about how all of the people who post here are drooling idiots, I’ll be glad to take you up on that offer!

    Comment by indyandy — November 20, 2007 @ 8:44 am | Reply

  32. I can’t agree more that the commenters here have become exceedingly stupid, annoying and exemplified mostly by their poor grammer and atrocious vocabulary.

    When I read their comments I feel that a young man in a leather motorcycle jacket is poking hot needles into my eyeballs.

    It makes me sick!

    Comment by Marty McPain — November 20, 2007 @ 9:03 am | Reply

  33. As usual, Jim and Arn are right on the money.

    I always question the intellect of people who go out of their way to edit, censor, revise, alter and misrepresent statements from people whom they may disagree with.

    Comment by Spacebrother — November 20, 2007 @ 9:55 am | Reply

  34. Yet another startling revelation. Yes, I too agree that the level of intelligence of the average “homo sapiens” is not much higher than that of a dog, though ofttimes a fairly clean dog (your comment about their rolling around in filth is mainly concerned with the average peasant or serf. Most of the mercantile class manage to put a little soap on their hands before dinner and some even bathe weekly like us of the higher class).

    What must be remembered, however, is that any dog can be properly trained if we masters are given enough control. Keep patiently teaching and we shall accomplish great things.

    Bravo,
    Baramos

    Comment by Baramos — November 20, 2007 @ 10:38 am | Reply

  35. Hmmm Baramos….what kind of name is that? Are you of European extraction? Are you a True Christian? What Church do you belong to?

    WHAT IS YOUR TITHING LEVEL?

    Then we can go over your use of the “we” word.

    Comment by Marty McPain — November 20, 2007 @ 10:42 am | Reply

  36. I is smart. I go skool.

    Comment by Marty McPain — November 20, 2007 @ 10:42 am

    Comment by Spacebrother — November 20, 2007 @ 2:09 pm | Reply

  37. Hey Armand, #2 is a parody. You have to be absolutely retarted not to see that. You think Falwell/Robertson/Brownback actually run their own myspaces? Give me a break _ famous people can have staffers make it for them, or have vandals create it. Falwell and Robertson aren’t really my cup of tea; I prefer D. James Kennedy.

    Arn, I’m not familiar with Republican Faith that well. I posted a couple of comments on there, but I’m not sure what their viewpoints are on issues such as Iraq, for instance. I can hardly believe that they would have a myspace, however.

    Comment by Bob_Corker — November 21, 2007 @ 3:18 pm | Reply

  38. Bobby Boy, I am well aware that most any myspace profile of any person of any fame is in all likelihood either fan made or parody.
    I was not posting them because I believed them to be real, but mostly because they existed.
    Why post fake profiles?
    Why do any comments on here tend to get away from the topic at hand?

    Comment by Armand Jean du Plessis de Richelieu — November 21, 2007 @ 6:55 pm | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: