Blogs 4 Brownback

November 14, 2007

Nintendo DS: Imagine Babies

Filed under: Investigation,Perverts,Video Games — Psycheout @ 2:42 pm
Tags: , ,

Imagine BabiesAnd yet another pedo game for the “touching is good” pedochat Nintendo DS. It’s shocking that filth like this is sold right out in the open. In this “game” the player is given total control over six virtual babies. The player can withhold food from them, force them to dance to Satanic techno and heavy metal music, play dress up with them and even exchange pedo photography with other “gamers” over Wi-fi. Collect them all! Sickening.

It’s distressing that babies are objectified and turned into slaves for the player’s carnal imagination, but it’s all here in one sick “game.” It’s more like a pedo simulator for pervs. The gamer is encouraged to rock the cradle or spin the crib mobile to hypnotize the helpless victim into a submissive state. And that’s where the “fun” begins.

A Skinny PuppyThis reminds me of the virtual pet craze from years ago. Children were addicted to these stupid keychain toys. They obsessed over their virtual pet, while their real living pets starved and whithered away. A number of petomaniacs took perverse thrills out of neglecting and starving their virtual pets to death. Who cares? A new one will be born after the old boring one dies.

This game takes virtual pets to the next horrifying level. Virtual babies. This is where jealous children can act out their immature fantasies of torturing or molesting their younger siblings on their DS, perhaps to act it out in real life after the pedo training is complete.

A 'Furry' BabyOn the right is a frame from one of the dress up sequences. Notice that this baby has been dressed up as a furry. In a real child this could lead to a lifetime of perversion and depravity. Furries trade pictures like this so that they can yiff in the privacy of their own closets or even out in public wearing diapers under a fursuit. How gross is that?

And nothing needs to be said about the diaper changing sequence. It’s thoroughly disturbing and disgusting. And a clean the house/yard scenario where you torment the baby with spiders? Horrifying. There’s also a selection of “toys” that you can use on the babies. You just don’t want to know. The player gets to decorate the house to their own personal demented tastes. I imagine a “Baby’s First Dungeon” playset is coming soon.

Nintendo DS - Japan Uber AllesIt would appear that the DS is an irredeemable tool of evil. There are so many violent and pornographic games that it cannot safely be kept in any Christian home. Snap it in half. That’s the only way to be sure.

Update: Parents, Nintendo is laughing at you.  Take a look at this: a game not-so-subtly titled Touch Dic.  Honestly, these people have no shame.

— Psycheout


  1. Did you ever think for a second that maybe the game was supposed to be a perfectly innocent babycare simulation? I note how you use abrasive and hateful language, rather than support your claims with legitimate evidence. can’t you conservatives do anything right?

    Comment by Angry Guy — November 14, 2007 @ 2:46 pm | Reply

  2. Hey guy. Did I hear someone say Pedo?

    Comment by Pedobear — November 14, 2007 @ 2:58 pm | Reply

  3. YOU ARE NOT A CONSERVATIVE! Nor do you speak for any, you look and sound like some facist. I am very conservative and i see nothing warranting what you say about the DS, so don’t even claim to be a conservative. Your overblownign EVERYINGTHING!!!

    Sure it is a stupid game, but it isn’t a pedo game.


    Comment by Anon e mouse — November 14, 2007 @ 2:58 pm | Reply

  4. This is simply horrible. How could babies be turned into some ‘game’? Here’s a website I found with more info on this kind of thing, and a petition to sign LINK REMOVED. This is the only way to stop these awful games from perverting America.
    May God be with you.

    [Ed Note: We do not allow links to porno sites. Consider yourself banned.]

    Comment by Name — November 14, 2007 @ 2:59 pm | Reply

  5. I bet yuo odn’t even know who the F* satan is! Pedophilia isn’t satanic. For it to be satanic it has to have satanic themes, lke doing things for the devil etc.
    Read this before you make yourself even more of a fool:

    [Ed Note: Yes, your pathetic comic strip is very convincing. Liberal trolls are so dumb.]

    Comment by Anon e mouse — November 14, 2007 @ 3:02 pm | Reply

  6. Good article Psychout. That is some real blood chilling stuff. I shudder to think what kind of “Easter eggs” might be found in that game; a dissection simulator for your virtual baby after it dies from the user’s depraved abuse. This game is just a training tool for future abortionists.

    Comment by BJ Tabor — November 14, 2007 @ 3:40 pm | Reply

  7. BJ and Sissy prefer real life pedosexuality over a game.

    (look uncle Sisyphus has dropped a soap bar, go collect it kiddo……)

    Yikes…..shame on you, you Village People !!!


    [Ed Note: Jim, are you ever going to have anything substantive to say? If you do, let us know. You are a very boring troll. Your signal to noise ratio is about nil. Have some pride in what you do and don’t just vomit in our comment threads. Thanks.]

    Comment by Sisyphus_is_Satans_Whore — November 14, 2007 @ 3:50 pm | Reply

  8. So just because it has babies, it’s automatically considered to be pedophilia? Don’t blame the game, blame the dirty mind I say. I shall now go back to play my pokémon game.

    Comment by Efrath — November 14, 2007 @ 3:53 pm | Reply

  9. wow, you have NO idea what easter eggs are, Tabor. easter eggs are small, inconsequential bonuses in a game, such as getting a different costume for your character, or being able to listen to the soundtrack outside gameplay, or unlocking cheat codes for fun. contrary to popular belief, the hot-coffee mode of GTA: San Andreas was NOT an Easter Egg, it was disabled code. This means they were originally planning it, but ultimately decided not to include it. They couldn’t just delete the code, as it could cause problems with other parts of the game. so they disabled it, and modders (not employees) figured out how to hack the game and bring back the code. they released a free patch so others could do it. THAT is not an easter egg. congratulations, you are now smarter.

    Comment by Elephant Bones — November 14, 2007 @ 4:56 pm | Reply

  10. Ed Note: Jim, are you ever going to have anything substantive to say?
    (yep, Ednose… are dull and repeating yourself)
    If you do, let us know.
    (i guess I just did that)
    You are a very boring troll.
    (on the contrary, i am very interesting and trolls are scifi rubbish only your mind can come up with)
    Your signal to noise ratio is about nil.
    (so is your intelligence)
    Have some pride in what you do
    (I absolutely love commenting)
    and don’t just vomit in our comment threads.
    (I would rather vomit in your face, but you are too chicken-minded to tell us where you live)
    (you are welcome)


    Comment by Sisyphus_is_Satans_Whore — November 14, 2007 @ 5:35 pm | Reply

  11. You, sir, are an excellent example of how one can use partial information and strong negative language to construe anything negatively.

    Have you, personally, ever changed a diaper? It is thoroughly disturbing and disgusting. But it is an integral part of child care. You seem to be advocating child abuse yourself. To extend your logic, children should never be seen nude by their parents, those baby pictures your parents took of you in the bathtub are pornography,and changing your baby’s diaper is fetish material. Congratulations!

    Sincerely, I congratulate you on perfectly illustrating the principl;e of “tell’em what they want to hear”.

    [Ed Note: I think what he meant was that including a diaper changing activity in a game is disturbing and disgusting. Changing one’s own child’s diaper is a mundane necessity. And by the way, people who send nude pictures of their children to the local photo developer often find themselves in trouble. And for good reason. FYI.]

    Comment by Armand Jean du Plessis de Richelieu — November 14, 2007 @ 5:47 pm | Reply

  12. thanks to you i now know another great game to play this weekend. if you could plaese, tell us more about pedo games, i’d be very, very grateful to know.

    seriously, have you ever played this game? maybe you are not inteligent enough to understand what the game teaches you, like not get you kid killed because of stupid things parents do. maybe you are too pedo and can only think perverted things out from this edutainment game, huh…

    oh wait, what about nintendogs? is it zoophilia? i might check my dog tomorrow morning, because my son played too much of it last month… dang! i knew there was something wrong with rex! now that hes not virgin anymore… i might come to him as well… cuz i played nintendogs! next month will be my kitty ❤ and after that, my neighbour’s horses!! all of them! enough with babies, animals are the best!

    btw, nice try, but wasn’t the last image supposed to have stars and stripes?

    Comment by anonymous — November 14, 2007 @ 6:54 pm | Reply

  13. “And nothing needs to be said about the diaper changing sequence. It’s thoroughly disturbing and disgusting.”

    I can only imagine what you think of having to change a real diaper on your real babies.

    Also, I have read your comment about “becoming one of us.” I used to be “one of us,” then I realized that St. Thomas Aquinas was correct when he described reason and intelligence as a way to develop a closer relationship with God.

    Comment by a TRUE Christian — November 14, 2007 @ 7:48 pm | Reply

  14. “[Ed Note: I think what he meant was that including a diaper changing activity in a game is disturbing and disgusting.]”

    Then so is a little girl pretending to “potty-train” a traditional baby doll, or “feeding” a doll with a toy bottle.

    Because that’s all this is. A virtual baby doll.

    Comment by a TRUE Christian — November 14, 2007 @ 7:50 pm | Reply

  15. And by the way, people who send nude pictures of their children to the local photo developer often find themselves in trouble. And for good reason. FYI.]
    So all those cute images that everyone has of their children as babies in silly hats or being bathed or whatever secretly got them arrested?
    What about that one print making the rounds in the past few years of places including the overtly Christian Hobby Lobby in which a baby is wearing nothing but a cowboy hat and boots and trying his damnedest to walk from the camera? That is porno, too?
    This just in! Cherished family mementos pornography!

    Comment by Armand Jean du Plessis de Richelieu — November 14, 2007 @ 8:45 pm | Reply

  16. I was playing this game today. I had fun making my virtual child pose in pornographic poses while my actual child starved.
    This blog is ridiculous. can it bee ban tiem now plees so I can stop being compelled to post here?
    No really, you’re so full of poo it’s ridiculous. I’m saddened to know that this is another poopstain on the underpants of the internet.

    Comment by Peddington Bear — November 14, 2007 @ 10:25 pm | Reply

  17. dear sir:

    love your poor christian buttocks. you have no basis proving any, ANY, of these claims. throwing out ‘…Satanic techno…’ was a good way to scare the living poo out of your chistmeanie followers. you do not understand the basis of Satanism. dont even start with your ‘touching is good means its pedo…blah blah…’ poo. anything can become dirty or pornographic if you think about it. cell phones can be used for masturbation, for love‘s sake. the BIBLE, for loving ‘christ’s sake is FULL of incest, merciless violence, racism, and prostitution. explain that, meanie. also, i frequently play grand theft auto, jericho, and many other incredibly violent games. and you know what i think? its just like the loving bible, except a little more up to date.

    go ahead, post a note commenting my points of view and how ‘…blah blah i think you will end up in jail…’ poop. i will tell you this:


    Comment by Anonymous — November 15, 2007 @ 12:37 am | Reply

  18. Too much Auschwitz Lego playsets have troubled SixSixSixSissypuSS’s clear vieuw on what are good or bad toys.

    Comment by Jim — November 15, 2007 @ 3:24 pm | Reply

  19. Go die in a fire :3

    Comment by Suiseiseki — November 16, 2007 @ 12:28 am | Reply

  20. […] Nintendo DS: Imagine Babies. Imagine […]

    Pingback by Nintendo DS Followup « Blogs 4 Brownback — November 16, 2007 @ 12:51 am | Reply

  21. Conservative Nintendo DS Bashing Site Revealed as Ultra Subtle Parody

    [Ed Note: Posting the same comment in several threads with a non-embedded link to your website is spam. Read the darn rules! And the headline in that post is 100% misleading, dummy.]

    Comment by Himmler — November 16, 2007 @ 11:14 am | Reply

  22. Bless you Psycheout for bringing this matter to our attention. I am praying that you are able by way of this needed blog to “out” the foul bastards who would pollute our youth.

    Comment by Pastor Joshua — November 16, 2007 @ 7:13 pm | Reply

  23. ahahahahaha!!!

    This made me laugh so hard!

    Notice the little “3+” on the box art? That obviously means this game is designed for young children, very much like young children play with baby dolls. Oh wait…. I’m sorry those are for perverts too who like to abuse them, throw them against the wall, light them on fire, etc.

    Your “dancing to satanic music” is probably a little baby rolling around to “twinkle twinkle little star.”

    If you’re going to try and get rid of video games, atleast do that to games such as Manhunt, Grand Theft Auto, or any other mindless killing game.

    And also, don’t say video games are non-Christian. I am a very devout Christian, and I play video games. Heck, my church’s pastor plays Halo.

    Comment by boo — November 17, 2007 @ 2:12 pm | Reply

  24. This is pure comedy Gold. You are such a funny man you should do stand up. I was quite sure this was a Satire but some people seem to be commenting like they take you seriously.

    Comment by Robbie Bell — November 17, 2007 @ 3:09 pm | Reply

  25. oh lawld he endds up actually censoring my post


    Comment by Anonymous — November 17, 2007 @ 8:15 pm | Reply

  26. did somebody just say pedochat?
    ’cause I think I heard somebody say pedochat

    Comment by M — November 24, 2007 @ 6:54 pm | Reply

  27. Wow. Pycheout, I have to say … you have to be one of the craziest people. Ever. Flat out. You’re nuts.

    Comment by Nomad — November 25, 2007 @ 8:06 pm | Reply

  28. Oh wait, its a joke. So now I feel stupid. Well, in my defence, some people actually think this way. :-p

    Comment by Nomad — November 25, 2007 @ 8:07 pm | Reply

  29. What’s a joke, your last comment?

    Comment by Psycheout — November 25, 2007 @ 9:48 pm | Reply

  30. ugh.. can’t believe I read this blog post… To attack a game aimed at CHILDREN to play, thats not much more harmful than buying a DOLL for a child. is a bit absurd. Unless you wish to stand by what you state in the article then you should also be calling for an all out ban on every single toy out there that mimicks any thing human/animal like. I.e. every doll in existence known to man. After all someone might come along buy a DOLL/STUFFED TOY and perv on it, should just ban dolls in ALL forms eh, also if your defence in this is that well the game/simulation makes it more realistic, how is it any way possibly more realistic than having a doll that you can actually physically feel with your hands and ‘undress’?

    Your argument against this game is a purely reflex reaction against a MEDIUM which you are obviously biased against. Its a Computer game, Computer Game = Bad. it has nothing to do with the game itself, the COMPUTER game could be about picking up stones and your first thought will be must find something wrong with the game to prove that its bad i.e. children shouldn’t play/touch computer based games.

    Comment by pcgamer — November 26, 2007 @ 7:21 am | Reply

  31. But we all know that PERVERTS like to buy dolls and RAPE THEM, DON’T WE? So BAN THEM! BAN THEM ALL! Glass windows? people can SEE THROUGH THEM! Quick, let’s ban air– Pedos breathe it!
    It might be worth noting that people who do misfeed their pets over NIntendogs are unable to see their pet looking incredibly thin. For this, they would have to be playing Nintendogs from when they wake up to when they go to sleep, and this is impossible.
    And everyone knows Twinkle Twinkle Little Star is SATANIC! People can RAPE other people to it, so it MUST be EVIL!
    (This post was mostly a joke, by the way, except for that bit in the middle.)

    Comment by Bob — November 26, 2007 @ 7:05 pm | Reply

  32. […] Girl Lyrical Nanoha Temptress and it is nothing of the sort.  It’s more like a funfest for pedos.  I will have more to report about this in the coming days, but it would appear that even kid […]

    Pingback by Magical Naked Girl Nanoha « Blogs 4 Brownback — November 26, 2007 @ 9:35 pm | Reply

  33. This game was never meant for negativeness. it was simply made for girls, and guys, to learn about child care. If you don’t like the graphics in a game dont play it

    Comment by Vikingirl — November 29, 2007 @ 3:25 pm | Reply

  34. “This game was never meant for negativeness. it was simply made for girls, and guys, to learn about child care. If you don’t like the graphics in a game dont play it”

    Or read the Bible, which, as has already been pointed out, contains graphic violence and sexual depravity. Yet I doubt God’s Word will ever be banned by these people–as mad as they are, they still have some common sense left.

    Comment by a TRUE Christian — December 4, 2007 @ 10:52 am | Reply

  35. what the hell are you on about its just a game your goin over the top its aimed at kids not adults and its cartoon so i dont think perves will get it carm down your the one whoose gonnna uin kids life int the future if u carry on stop being so mingy. after just reading some other comments i see not a lot of people agree with you its a chlids game for god sake if you dont like it tough youll have to deal with it stop bein a mingy old man you rewmind me of SCROOGE

    Comment by rebeccca — December 8, 2007 @ 5:03 am | Reply

  36. Rebecca, next time you make a post, slow down, proofread, make sure your sentence structure is clear, then hit Send.

    Comment by L — December 8, 2007 @ 10:10 pm | Reply

  37. rebecc(c)a

    What is a ‘carm’? The ‘r’ is nowhere near the ‘l’, so don’t even try telling me that’s a typo.

    Comment by Bob_Corker — December 9, 2007 @ 3:05 pm | Reply

  38. yeah, i have no idea how she could have typed an r, since none of the words in ‘calm’ come close to it

    Comment by Elephant Bones — December 9, 2007 @ 3:52 pm | Reply

  39. Wow you deduced all that on your own, From a children’s game designed for young girls. you sir need to be checked out. If you were a normal person, you would see nothing wrong with this game. YOU sir Are a pedophile. You demonstrated to us, how a pedophile sees things differently than the rest of us. If you were my neighbor I would keep a very close eye on you, my friend.

    And by the way. Their are many issues of importance, that our society is faced with. You could spend the time to find a more pressing problem, to bring to the publics attention.

    Comment by rpaloallto — December 11, 2007 @ 3:23 pm | Reply

  40. you sir are a FaGg0t!!!!!!!!!!

    Comment by Sanmaster — December 12, 2007 @ 1:00 am | Reply

  41. After struggling through these previous 40 post like the illiterate pig-monkey you are, I’m sure you won’t bother to look properly at mine, so here it is simply:

    Die in a fire, you failure at life.

    Comment by gref — December 13, 2007 @ 11:19 am | Reply

  42. How sad it is to see a man so “wise” (I’m a 15-yr-old , sir…and yes, I can over-use inverted commas as well), so detached from reality that he has an absolute fear of a video game aimed at 12-yr-old females. Are you suggesting that the distributors of toys throughout the world are to stop producing infant-simulation dolls because a suspected pedophile happens to buy it…

    The simple fact that your analogy used is that of people “starving” their 4-bit liquid diamond Tamagotchi pets is just ridiculous.

    Did it occur to you that perhaps this game was just supposed to be fun for the target audience? Rather than a tool of destruction pedophiles can use to feed their sick fantasy’s. Something not even the game designers would have thought about.

    Close down your blog sir, because I’m sure a virtual infant dancing to “satanic” techno could write a more mature and informed response.

    Comment by JakeZero — December 15, 2007 @ 7:19 am | Reply

  43. You are all mad!
    I am going to purchase this game for my 11 year old niece, who by the way is NOT a peadophile. Just a young girl who loves babies.

    For you to even think all these things about a game makes me wonder what else you are thinking about.

    maybe you should seek forgiveness, for your own sinful thoughts.


    Comment by — December 17, 2007 @ 7:47 am | Reply

  44. I think you are making people think that everything is bad I mean it is a game for younger children and im sure some bloke wont want to play it. Im 14 and I think you are a liar and a fraud you should be locked up for saying those disgusting things. seee kids read this then you probably give them ideas they do everything there told not too. what if a pedo did see this site then what. I mean if you say it is something a pedo would want to do then sure they will but reading trhis could gie them ideas. your the sick one!!!

    [Ed Note: Good point, whatever it was you were trying to say.]

    Comment by Someonw — December 18, 2007 @ 4:30 am | Reply

  45. […] More on the Nintendo DS: Early Christmas Alert, Nintendo DS Followup, Imagine Babies. […]

    Pingback by Christmas Alert: Touch Dic « Blogs 4 Brownback — December 25, 2007 @ 8:58 am | Reply

  46. i think you really are taking this too far!! I have jst recieved the game for christmas which i asked for!! i can’t see anything wrong with have a virual “tamagotchi” baby!!. Next you will be saying to ban the virtual dolls they use in secondary schools!!!

    Comment by xxtreaclexx — December 25, 2007 @ 12:23 pm | Reply

  47. Well, I sincerely hope you enjoy your Christmas gift. Just remember with it comes responsibility. Do not torture the babies by withholding food or making them dance to Satanic German techno musik. May G-d have mercy on your parents’ souls.

    Maybe you could follow up on this comment in a few weeks after the game affects you in such a way that, I don’t know, you are enticed to litter or curse at your teacher.

    It might be interesting to see how long the negative effects of this “game” take to manifest themselves.

    Good luck.

    Comment by Psycheout — December 25, 2007 @ 12:44 pm | Reply

  48. Oh My God, you are all sooooo weird.
    Its a cute game for kids!
    and anyway, whats the problem, if a woman for some horrible reason couldnt have kids she might want this game because it makes them happy.

    GET A LIFE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    “Well, I sincerely hope you enjoy your Christmas gift. Just remember with it comes responsibility. Do not torture the babies by withholding food or making them dance to Satanic German techno musik. May G-d have mercy on your parents’ souls.” < AAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHH HA HA HA HA. u should be stand up comedian, infact most of you could

    If it wasnt for people ike banging on about this and racism etc etc, it wouldnt be such a problem.

    Comment by Lucifer — December 28, 2007 @ 5:14 pm | Reply

  49. The guy that wrote this review is a sick sick man.

    Comment by ben — December 29, 2007 @ 8:08 pm | Reply

  50. OMG you sad American idiot. It’s a game for kids, only sick minded individuals see things from the mind of a paedo!

    Comment by Kirsty — January 13, 2008 @ 9:09 am | Reply

  51. If you had a brain you’d be lethal.

    Stupid ignorant fool.

    May i suggest you get your head out of your creationist fantasy life and get this thing us in the developed world call an EDUCATION you closed minded bigot.

    It’s a computer game. It’s not real life. It’s innocent.

    I suppose you object to girls playing with dolls too because they show their genitalia?


    Comment by Rogerme Overthetable-Sideways — January 13, 2008 @ 1:51 pm | Reply

  52. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, if you want to ban this sort of thing because “pedophiles might play it,” then ban ALL baby dolls because–oh no!–pedophiles might play with them!! The horror!

    While we’re at it, let’s ban cars, because someone might die in an automobile accident! And let’s ban soda because some people drink too much of it! And let’s get rid of clothes because some people wear skimpy outfits!

    Your illogic is hilarious.

    Comment by L — January 27, 2008 @ 8:24 pm | Reply

  53. you apparently have too much time on your hands. GET A LIFE! OMG! I PLAYED THE GAME LAST NIGHT! I AM GOING TO HELL!

    Comment by src — March 7, 2008 @ 8:38 am | Reply

  54. Ha.

    You’re sick, get help.

    Comment by Thijzo — March 18, 2008 @ 8:32 am | Reply

  55. The only perversion I am seeing here is a politician who looks at a baby care simulator and sees nothing but a pedophilia simulation tool. Rather interesting Horshack test, no? Speaking of which, I’m sure you’re against those; what with all of the veiled pedophilia going on there too.

    Comment by Mr. Nein — March 22, 2008 @ 3:45 pm | Reply

  56. This is SHOVELWARE, ie: games crapped out of large developers that could only be appealing to small children. How can this be misconstrued as satanic or pedophiliac? No one over the age of 10 is going to play this game.

    Comment by Tim Hoffman — March 23, 2008 @ 12:54 pm | Reply

  57. I’d like to know if you’ve even played this game. I happen to think it is a good idea because it teaches children to be caring. It is in no way perverse and you must be to think such a thing. It is simply a babycare simulator for little girls and nonetheless

    Comment by Allie — March 25, 2008 @ 4:45 pm | Reply

  58. Wow… whoever thought that such an innocent game could hold such evils ….ok ..being very sarcastic there. Maybe instead of claiming the game is for pedo’s should look at yourself and wonder why you would assume or associate kids with pedo’s maybe you ..are one and are lashing out on innocent games because your perv mind twisted it? Possibility there! Get yourself checked out before you rant on about a simple, innocent, game.

    Comment by Akita — May 2, 2008 @ 11:40 am | Reply

  59. Yeah-sexy teddy bear………
    I have this strange feeling that if I tried this game before reading all this that none of it would have even occurred to me. Why not try some positive clean thoughts if you want to crusade anti perversion. There is no way anyone BUT a pervert would have come up with all this crap. Get some help as your plan of hiding in the open to dissuade susapicion will only work on the very naive. (and then only if they’ve never seen a cop show where the ‘purp’ pretends to help the investigation.

    Comment by wut? — May 8, 2008 @ 7:52 pm | Reply

  60. I think that you are the one with the sick imagination. I mean this is a really harmless cute game where you get to learn about looking after children and for you to think like that and make that kind of stuff up about that game… well… i dont even want to know what you do in your spare time and you are obviously the one that does that kind of stuff. Because i can tell you right now… no one else does! get over your self and get a life.

    Comment by Brittany-Louise — May 11, 2008 @ 12:33 am | Reply

  61. I posted here on December last year.

    I am now 16 years old.

    I have matured since then, but not enough to stop myself from saying this: GO INSTALL A VAGINA INTO YOUR FACE AND PROCEED TO FUCK YOURSELF YOU FUNDAMENTALIST ASSHOLE!

    Thank You, and goodnight.

    Comment by JakeZero — June 17, 2008 @ 4:13 pm | Reply

  62. i love that game im geting it tmorrow

    Comment by hayley — August 6, 2008 @ 3:45 am | Reply

  63. ……You’re an idiot.

    Comment by Rachel — January 28, 2009 @ 7:24 pm | Reply

  64. um… Touch Dic is a dictionary game. It’s just an unfortunate abbreviation. Where do you get the idea that there’s intentional innuendo?

    And I’m sure the baby game is marketed for little kids and girls. 😛

    Comment by F. Pelayo — May 10, 2009 @ 5:17 pm | Reply

  65. Dude, you have a problem. :/

    Comment by TheJake — May 23, 2010 @ 6:25 pm | Reply

  66. Hilarious. I assume this is meant to be sarcastic, but if it’s not, you could have inadvertently discovered a talent for writing stand-up, even if they don’t seem like jokes to you. Almost as great as the rant about South Dakota not being able to grow corn due to the large population of ice dragons which keep ravaging farmland.

    Comment by Xero — November 12, 2010 @ 3:29 am | Reply

  67. You are so interesting! I do not suppose I’ve truly read anything like that before. So nice to discover someone with some unique thoughts on this subject matter. Seriously.. thank you for starting this up. This site is something that is needed on the internet, someone with a bit of originality!

    Comment by more training Golden retriever puppy facts — May 10, 2013 @ 7:20 pm | Reply

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: