Blogs 4 Brownback

November 10, 2007

Proof That This Site Is Not a Parody

ClownI’m a little bit tired of having to defend Blogs 4 Brownback against endless accusations that it’s a parody site. The long and short of it is, it isn’t. Nothing said by leftist journalists or indignant trolls can alter the fact that we stand by every word we write. We believe what we say. Deal with it.

I know that the Truth is a hard thing for liberals to swallow. Being fed on a diet of lies your whole life is like eating nothing but poison and potato chips until you hit 30. Your body, mind, and soul are incredibly warped, and it could take years for them to adjust to a healthier lifestyle.

I just wanted you to know that your views and opinions sound equally warped to me. Here is my impression of a typical leftist poster on this blog. It’s no one in particular, just my compilation “parody” take on the amalgamation of deviant positions you people espouse:

Hello, I seem to be having some sort of problem. You see, I’m a typical liberal American. I enjoy Satan-worshipping, flag-burning, child molesting, and church-window-breaking as much as the next liberal. But lately, I’ve begun to question my relationship with my significant others. Let me tell you the story.

The other night, after saying our prayers to Satan and burning incense and kitten corpses wrapped in opium-drenched American flags, I was fornicating as usual with my boyfriend, girlfriend, and dogfriend. The fornication was very nice, and I was pleased to note that I could almost hear Jesus crying as He watched us frolic and desecrate our bodies in unnatural sexual acts so heinous that not even Satan himself could have conceived of them. So it was a typical night so far, really.

The problem arose during a lull in our unspeakable sodomies. We decided to enhance our sinning experience by taking highly illegal drugs, in order to make ourselves “high” so that the next session of fornication could attain even deeper levels of vileness and depravity. My boyfriend and girlfriend each had many different pills of numerous shapes and sizes and colors, and my natural instinct was to consume them all, since secularism is colorblind and one of a thing is as good as another. But my boyfriend and girlfriend became quite indignant when I tried to eat these red pills. “Don’t take those,” they said. “They’ll knock you out, and then we won’t be able to keep defiling our bodies with you.”

Now, I can appreciate the need for a good round of fornication as well as the next liberal. After all, trying to kill God and destroy the United States are part of our very essence, and unnatural sexual congress is an integral part of our long-term strategy in achieving those goals. But what I didn’t like was that my partners insisted that I only take the small blue pills. That struck me as incredibly racist, and completely contrary to the affirmative action policies every good liberal should espouse to the utter detriment of society as a whole.

I’ve come to think that my boyfriend, girlfriend, and dogfriend are actually concealing latent conservative tendencies. Their racism must not go unpunished. I have already written to Osama Bin Laden for instructions on the matter. He advised me to kill them and burn their corpses on a bonfire. I think I will do just that. Then Osama will reward my faithful service when he conquers this weak, Christian nation by giving me numerous Christian slaves to molest and corrupt and turn aside from the ways of God and toward the path of Satan. Fundamentally, secularism and Islam are the same. We both want to tell Americans that their way of life is degenerate and evil, and we both want to enslave them and force them to do our bidding. I think Osama and I see eye to eye on the issues that really matter, like destroying America and forcing everyone in Texas to worship at the altar of Beelzebub.

Thank Satan (through his trusted medium of conversion, rap music) for people like me, otherwise America might remain a Christian nation and derive strength from Jesus Christ in its holy quest to make the peoples of the world turn aside from secularism and toward decency, virtue, and other words I despise. Thank God that soon all such people will convert under our torments or be crucified and die. We shall inherit the Earth, and sing Kumbaya with the Islamists all day and all night long.

That is what a parody looks like, liberals. And it’s only funny because it hits so close to home, to what you people really think and feel.

This blog is not a parody. You are.

85 Comments »

  1. Fundamentally, secularism and Islam are the same.

    BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA….
    *gasp*
    hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha…

    This is soooo ridiculous.

    Comment by PG — November 10, 2007 @ 8:24 am | Reply

  2. PS: This up there is a sledgehammer parody on the brink of becoming slander. Your normal modus operandi is a bit moire subtile.😉

    Comment by PG — November 10, 2007 @ 8:26 am | Reply

  3. “I know that the Truth is a hard thing for liberals to swallow”

    Well we must get them on their knees and stand before them and FORCE them to swallow the truth!

    They are so filled with lies and hatred and bad thoughts that the truth will be like burning lava all over their faces.

    I am so happy I am a normal conservative.

    Comment by Marty McPain — November 10, 2007 @ 8:52 am | Reply

  4. “Well we must get them on their knees and stand before them and FORCE them to swallow the truth!

    They are so filled with lies and hatred and bad thoughts that the truth will be like burning lava all over their faces.

    I am so happy I am a normal conservative.”

    Comment by Marty McPain — November 10, 2007 @
    8:52 am

    You must be a homo for wanting dudes to get on their knee’s and force them to swallow or maybe you’re another pedophile like Bob_KKKorKKKer.

    Comment by Spacebrother — November 10, 2007 @ 9:27 am | Reply

  5. Mr. Sisyphus,

    Thank goodness you let us know specifically that this was your parody of a liberal. I didn’t understand that at first, and I had to read the post several times, especially the part about fornicating with a man and woman at the same time. Do people really do that?

    I wasn’t sure it was a parody at first, but now I see what you are doing. You are showing your readers that parody must be just a little bit more scandalous than the truth. Much of what you wrote about liberals is similar to what I hear when I listen to Rush or Bill O’Reilly on the radio, but you take it just a little bit farther. The implication that the liberal’s boyfriend, girlfriend, and dogfriend (seriously, I don’t even know what that means) could possibly be conservative gives the whole piece away. Once I understood that, the piece was quite funny.

    Thank you for clarifying parody for us. Your wisdom and thoughtfulness are appreciated.

    A Married Lady

    Comment by amarriedlady — November 10, 2007 @ 9:42 am | Reply

  6. My own Interblog site has been a cussed of being parody time and again. I got to happening so much I had to look up the definition.

    Why don’t liberal Interbloggers understand that Good Christians can say their piece on the Interwebs, too? First they take over the mainstream media, and now they want to take over the Interblogs.

    It is a Free Country, afterall, and it will stay free only if Rep. Tom Tancredo is elected President.

    -RPTH
    2007 Weblog Award Finalist
    (multiple categories)

    Comment by Hipple, Rev. Paul T. — November 10, 2007 @ 10:01 am | Reply

  7. Of course this site is not a parody. You’re not funny.

    Go, Ron Paul!

    Comment by Cato Freeman — November 10, 2007 @ 11:01 am | Reply

  8. “PS: This up there is a sledgehammer parody on the brink of becoming slander. Your normal modus operandi is a bit moire subtile.”

    There’s nothing slanderous about the truth, PG.

    “You must be a homo for wanting dudes to get on their knee’s and force them to swallow or maybe you’re another pedophile like Bob_KKKorKKKer.”

    Go back to your swastikas, Spacebrother.

    “Thank goodness you let us know specifically that this was your parody of a liberal. I didn’t understand that at first, and I had to read the post several times, especially the part about fornicating with a man and woman at the same time. Do people really do that?”

    Only liberals, ma’am. They barely even count as people.

    “Thank you for clarifying parody for us. Your wisdom and thoughtfulness are appreciated.”

    Thank you!

    “My own Interblog site has been a cussed of being parody time and again. I got to happening so much I had to look up the definition.”

    It’s sickening that liberals constantly smear their decent, Christian opponents with the same foul brush that so aptly applies to the liberals themselves. But, such is the nature of ascribing to a system of lies.

    “Why don’t liberal Interbloggers understand that Good Christians can say their piece on the Interwebs, too? First they take over the mainstream media, and now they want to take over the Interblogs.”

    They hate us, and want to see all killed or converted to secularist Islamism like them.

    It is a Free Country, afterall, and it will stay free only if Rep. Tom Tancredo is elected President.”

    You lost me there, friend. God has clearly ordained that His faithful minister, Sam Brownback, shall win the Presidency via a spontaneous and overwhelming write-in campaign on Election Day itself, that all may witness this miracle.

    Comment by Sisyphus — November 10, 2007 @ 11:29 am | Reply

  9. “Of course this site is not a parody. You’re not funny.”

    Thank you, Cato!

    “Go, Ron Paul!”

    Sieg Heil!

    Comment by Sisyphus — November 10, 2007 @ 11:32 am | Reply

  10. [deleted]

    Comment by Arn Lewis — November 10, 2007 @ 11:59 am | Reply

  11. No, it’s a parody. Used to be a really good one, but they’ve gotten lazy.

    Comment by Salmo — November 10, 2007 @ 12:09 pm | Reply

  12. “Go back to your swastikas, Spacebrother.”

    Comment by Sisyphus — November 10, 2007 @ 11:29 am

    No thanks SixsixsixSisyphus, I won’t join you in your fanatical homo-erotic Nazi gay sex fantasy.

    “Of course this site is not a parody. You’re not funny.”

    “Thank you, Cato!”

    “Go, Ron Paul!”

    “Sieg Heil!”

    Comment by Sisyphus — November 10, 2007 @ 11:32 am

    I guess you want a little Nazi fantasy circle jerk 666Sisyphus.

    Comment by Spacebrother — November 10, 2007 @ 12:24 pm | Reply

  13. [deleted]

    Comment by Spacebrother — November 10, 2007 @ 12:34 pm | Reply

  14. I suppose the truth could be called a parody of lies and the Bible a parody of Playboy.

    Comment by Anna Logee — November 10, 2007 @ 1:04 pm | Reply

  15. Wow! That was fantastic! I have tears streaming down my face. Maybe you should start a liberal parody blog. People wouldn’t be able to tell the difference. They’d think you were the average DU’er.

    Brilliant, simply brilliant.

    Comment by Psycheout — November 10, 2007 @ 1:20 pm | Reply

  16. [deleted]

    Comment by Arn Lewis — November 10, 2007 @ 1:33 pm | Reply

  17. [deleted]

    Comment by amarriedlady — November 10, 2007 @ 2:19 pm | Reply

  18. [deleted]

    Comment by Psycheout — November 10, 2007 @ 2:29 pm | Reply

  19. [deleted]

    Comment by Arn Lewis — November 10, 2007 @ 3:10 pm | Reply

  20. [deleted]

    Comment by Psycheout — November 10, 2007 @ 3:16 pm | Reply

  21. Yikes!

    And I thought some of my readers were bad.

    Anyway, no, this site is not a parody, trust me. No matter what you think about him, Psycheout believes what he says – and this isn’t coming from any real fan of him either – as I’m sure he will tell you.

    Comment by Matt A. — November 10, 2007 @ 3:34 pm | Reply

  22. I disagree, Matt. They’ve been winking to the camera (so to speak) a lot more lately. I’d look for an example, but my superhot girlfriend is coming over. I’m making veggieburgers and pasta. Then I’m going to perform a base act on her.

    Now how will they react to that?…

    [Ed Note: Please spare us the details.]

    Comment by Salmo — November 10, 2007 @ 5:17 pm | Reply

  23. I’m not sure that this post qualifies as any kind of “proof”. In general, it’s pretty hard to prove a negative anyway.

    That said…

    I just want you guys to know that, parody or not (and my current position is “not”), I’m a big fan. I’ve posted thousands of comments on hundreds of blogs, and B4B is easily in my top 10 favorites.

    Comment by ChenZhen — November 10, 2007 @ 11:14 pm | Reply

  24. [deleted]

    Comment by spacebrother — November 11, 2007 @ 5:53 am | Reply

  25. ¡Vive socialismo!

    Comment by Linus — November 11, 2007 @ 8:59 pm | Reply

  26. NO U!

    Comment by Holstarr — November 12, 2007 @ 3:30 am | Reply

  27. you are perhaps one of the most frightening people i’ve ever had the honour of reading. you believe in christian values yet you’ve clearly shown that you have an inability either “turn the other cheek” or forgive others for what you see as misgivings. surely for a safer society you should shut up and stop spouting such nonsense… we’re all hear on the same planet and are here to love one another or at least respect each others opinions not create secularism and hatred of people who differ from you…

    i’m just glad i don’t live in america cos in britain we’d think you were crazy!

    Comment by ric — November 12, 2007 @ 7:55 am | Reply

  28. [deleted]

    Comment by Sisyphus — November 12, 2007 @ 8:34 am | Reply

  29. (The article by Sisyphus) Home run again Sisyphus. You show these moonbats the real joke is there is no joke. The left behavior is so outrageous no one can parody it.

    Comment by BJ Tabor — November 12, 2007 @ 11:35 am | Reply

  30. [deleted]

    Comment by BJ Tabor — November 12, 2007 @ 11:53 am | Reply

  31. “Consider the number of vicious predators like Spacebrother who are here just looking for some someone to hurt”
    Comment by BJ Tabor

    Lol, you are a hyperhypochristian BJ

    Also this sentence was hilariously entertaining: “The other night, after saying our prayers to Satan and burning incense and kitten corpses wrapped in opium-drenched American flags”

    1. Opium isn’t liquid.
    2. To cover a whole flag (regular size) would cost you at least 9000 dollar
    3. Even the most braindead addict in the world wouldn’t burn his drug supply, he would rather smoke it.

    But since this whole story was made up by Sisyphus I can only conclude that mister Sissy has a very weird fetish indeed (what fills the heart fills the mouth).

    See you all again in some weeks
    Jim

    Comment by Jim — November 12, 2007 @ 12:03 pm | Reply

  32. PS.

    this site is a travesty and/or a tragedy

    Comment by Jim — November 12, 2007 @ 12:18 pm | Reply

  33. You talk so much of satan, its in almost every sentence. Through their own words they will reveal themselves. Your hate is evil.
    Your mind is a sewer.

    Comment by scared of you. — November 12, 2007 @ 1:14 pm | Reply

  34. your hate is evil.
    your mind is a sewer.

    Comment by scared of you. — November 12, 2007 @ 1:19 pm | Reply

  35. Seeeeee!!! 1,000 monkeys will write Shakespeare…given time.What took you so long?

    Comment by idonotknowyournamr — November 12, 2007 @ 2:09 pm | Reply

  36. Blasted monkeys!!!

    Comment by tenpinalley — November 12, 2007 @ 2:43 pm | Reply

  37. “You must be a homo for wanting dudes”

    what? are you crazy? Space-Ho you must be one of them deviants, not me. I believe in the truth of the bible and want to share it will all men. It is most often a moment of true acceptance when they are on their knees.

    It is not a homo thing. Was Jesus a homo? You are simply disgusting!

    Comment by Marty McPain — November 12, 2007 @ 9:36 pm | Reply

  38. [deleted]

    Comment by spacebrother — November 12, 2007 @ 11:37 pm | Reply

  39. [deleted]

    Comment by spacebrother — November 12, 2007 @ 11:43 pm | Reply

  40. “what? are you crazy? Space-Ho you must be one of them deviants, not me. I believe in the truth of the bible and want to share it will all men. IT IS MOST OFTEN A MOMENT OF TRUE ACCEPTANCE WHEN THEY ARE ON THEIR KNEES.”

    Comment by Marty McPain — November 12, 2007 @ 9:36 pm

    You heard bit here folks. Don’t reach for the soap in front of Marty McPain and definitely keep your children away from this freak.

    I refuse to be your HO Marty McLame.

    Comment by spacebrother — November 12, 2007 @ 11:48 pm | Reply

  41. [deleted]

    Comment by Psycheout — November 13, 2007 @ 2:08 am | Reply

  42. I wish you take yourself a bit more seriously, PsyKKKeout.
    You are not a parody, you are a tragedy.

    Jim

    Comment by Psycheout_sucks_rocks_in_hell — November 13, 2007 @ 4:31 am | Reply

  43. LOL

    Comment by Spacebrother — November 13, 2007 @ 11:10 am | Reply

  44. Could’nt agree more about Psykkkeout.

    Comment by Spacebrother — November 13, 2007 @ 11:17 am | Reply

  45. “1. Opium isn’t liquid.”

    It can be liquified.

    “2. To cover a whole flag (regular size) would cost you at least 9000 dollar”

    Awful precise with that number, aren’t you?

    “3. Even the most braindead addict in the world wouldn’t burn his drug supply, he would rather smoke it.”

    Which involves burning it.

    Your whole post just goes to show that I was on the right track when I accused leftists of this sort of behavior.

    Comment by Sisyphus — November 13, 2007 @ 11:18 am | Reply

  46. To know that opium can be liquified proves that you know an awful lot bout dope…..you remind me of that now locked away dealer round the corner.

    BTW smoking involves burning….true, but smoking a flag is a bit…..uhhhhh….not quite logical (try smoking a bong instead of a flag before you post 666Sisyphus….haha)

    Greets
    Jim

    Comment by Sisyphus_is_Satans_Whore — November 13, 2007 @ 11:35 am | Reply

  47. (or just get sober instead…..you are a bit of a cheesy Cheech and Chong parody right now)

    Comment by Sisyphus_is_Satans_Whore — November 13, 2007 @ 11:36 am | Reply

  48. Why do you make the baby Jesus cry, Space-Ho?

    Why do you hate America?

    Why are you filled with dirty lustfull thoughts of men buring your privates with cigars while you drink opium?

    Comment by Marty McPain — November 13, 2007 @ 11:48 am | Reply

  49. “Why do you make the baby Jesus cry, Space-Ho?

    Why do you hate America?

    Why are you filled with dirty lustfull thoughts of men buring your privates with cigars while you drink opium?”

    Comment by Marty McPain — November 13, 2007 @ 11:48 am

    Huh? You are a rather stupid person are’nt you? Spent a little too much time sniffing glue?

    Keep your Jesus sex fantasy to yourself Farty McCheese.

    Comment by Spacebrother — November 13, 2007 @ 12:52 pm | Reply

  50. Not only is this a parody site, but it’s an extremely clever and amusing parody site.

    This posting is one of your most creative postings ever. I’m so glad you wrote it, because as you know, many conservatives view liberals in just about this way. You call it a sledgehammer, but frankly, I’ve met people who think you’ve accurately described a typical Saturday night in, well, my household. I call it parody; Michael Medved would call it a documentary.

    You are so darned creative. I wish I was as creative as this.

    Comment by MikeM — November 13, 2007 @ 1:34 pm | Reply

  51. “This posting is one of your most creative postings ever. I’m so glad you wrote it, because as you know, many conservatives view liberals in just about this way. You call it a sledgehammer, but frankly, I’ve met people who think you’ve accurately described a typical Saturday night in, well, my household. I call it parody; Michael Medved would call it a documentary.”

    So, you admit it, then?

    Comment by Sisyphus — November 13, 2007 @ 4:40 pm | Reply

  52. Why are you filled with dirty lustfull thoughts of men buring your privates with cigars while you drink opium?

    Comment by Marty McPain — November 13, 2007 @ 11:48 am

    —————-
    I just want to know what buring is.

    Comment by Arn Lewis — November 13, 2007 @ 5:47 pm | Reply

  53. So, you admit it, then?

    Comment by Sisyphus — November 13, 2007 @ 4:40 pm

    Absolutely.

    (The part about Medved, that is. Believe it or not, I haven’t even SEEN a drug since about 1980. And I’ve never slept with a guy. Ugh. It’s an exit, not an entrance.)

    Comment by MikeM — November 13, 2007 @ 5:51 pm | Reply

  54. I guess buring is boring

    Comment by Sisyphus_is_Satans_Whore — November 13, 2007 @ 7:41 pm | Reply

  55. “I just want to know what buring is.

    Comment by Arn Lewis — November 13, 2007 @ 5:47 pm ”

    don’t ask me ask the space-ho!!

    Comment by Marty McPain — November 13, 2007 @ 8:05 pm | Reply

  56. Marty: that makes no sense, why should I ask him what it is when you are the one that said it?

    Comment by Arn Lewis — November 14, 2007 @ 11:54 am | Reply

  57. satanic orgy? I CAME! seriously, i hope your site really is a hoax, because if people like you still exist, it means the terrorists are winning.

    Comment by Elephant Bones — November 14, 2007 @ 4:15 pm | Reply

  58. Marty: that makes no sense, why should I ask him what it is when you are the one that said it?
    Comment by Arn Lewis

    (I guess his brain got “raptured” Arn, so he can not answer it)

    greetings Jim M Reswati

    Comment by Sisyphus_is_Satans_Whore — November 14, 2007 @ 5:41 pm | Reply

  59. “PS: This up there is a sledgehammer parody on the brink of becoming slander. Your normal modus operandi is a bit moire subtile.”
    No my dear fellow, slander is spoken, this is written and therefore would be libel, except that it does not exactly fit that bill either.
    You see, for it to fit either of those definitions it would have to be asserting that a certain group or individual actually took part in such and such or were such and such in a manner intended to damage. It must be based in fiction. Whilst this article certainly at first appears to meet the criteria, it clearly is not meant to be taken at all seriously.
    Furthermore, it is not actually any sort of decent example of a parody. It does not show any sort of actual humor, seriously, this is one of the least funny things I have read on this blog. Also to be a parody, it has to somehow actually relate back to the original subject matter. No bisexual satanists go to this blog leaving comments explaining their complicated sex lives, so then this cannot be a parody of comments on this site.
    That being said, my bisexual lover is actually a Bush supporter and I am yet to convince him that Bush is a thorough screw up. I am afraid that this may damage our relationship. Generally we agree on other things, but this one issue keeps coming up. Do you have any relationship advice for a confused gay man?

    Comment by Armand Jean du Plessis de Richelieu — November 14, 2007 @ 7:25 pm | Reply

  60. “Wow! That was fantastic! I have tears streaming down my face. Maybe you should start a liberal parody blog. People wouldn’t be able to tell the difference. They’d think you were the average DU’er.

    Brilliant, simply brilliant.”

    You’d be surprised.

    Comment by a TRUE Christian — November 14, 2007 @ 8:28 pm | Reply

  61. Thanks again for proving that your site is not a parody, by proving conclusively that you are incapable of writing anything resembling satire.

    Comment by a TRUE Christian — November 14, 2007 @ 9:55 pm | Reply

  62. This furtrher proves that this site is run by trolls and this blog a giant joke.

    Comment by Armand Jean du Plessis de Richelieu — November 14, 2007 @ 10:12 pm | Reply

  63. “don’t ask me ask the space-ho!!”

    Comment by Marty McPain — November 13, 2007 @ 8:05 pm

    You’re hitting on me are’nt you Marty McMeatgazer?

    Comment by spacebrother — November 15, 2007 @ 3:38 am | Reply

  64. “Furthermore, it is not actually any sort of decent example of a parody. It does not show any sort of actual humor, seriously, this is one of the least funny things I have read on this blog. Also to be a parody, it has to somehow actually relate back to the original subject matter. No bisexual satanists go to this blog leaving comments explaining their complicated sex lives, so then this cannot be a parody of comments on this site.”

    There’s no accounting for taste, especially when you’re dealing with liberals. Moreover, I’ve already explained it dealt with the general flavor and hidden agenda of liberals, rather than any specific commenter. Except for you, apparently:

    “That being said, my bisexual lover is actually a Bush supporter and I am yet to convince him that Bush is a thorough screw up. I am afraid that this may damage our relationship. Generally we agree on other things, but this one issue keeps coming up. Do you have any relationship advice for a confused gay man?”

    Repent, and pray to Jesus that He may show you the way out of your sins.

    “This furtrher proves that this site is run by trolls and this blog a giant joke.”

    You are insane, Frenchman.

    Comment by Sisyphus — November 15, 2007 @ 7:35 am | Reply

  65. Furthermore, it is not actually any sort of decent example of a parody.

    Some people have no developed sense of humor. Where I come from, we call them liberals. Oops, sorry. Progressives.

    Comment by Psycheout — November 15, 2007 @ 8:12 am | Reply

  66. “Furthermore, it is not actually any sort of decent example of a parody. It does not show any sort of actual humor, seriously, this is one of the least funny things I have read on this blog. Also to be a parody, it has to somehow actually relate back to the original subject matter. No bisexual satanists go to this blog leaving comments explaining their complicated sex lives, so then this cannot be a parody of comments on this site.”

    There’s no accounting for taste, especially when you’re dealing with liberals. Moreover, I’ve already explained it dealt with the general flavor and hidden agenda of liberals, rather than any specific commenter. Except for you, apparently:

    “That being said, my bisexual lover is actually a Bush supporter and I am yet to convince him that Bush is a thorough screw up. I am afraid that this may damage our relationship. Generally we agree on other things, but this one issue keeps coming up. Do you have any relationship advice for a confused gay man?”

    Repent, and pray to Jesus that He may show you the way out of your sins.

    “This furtrher proves that this site is run by trolls and this blog a giant joke.”

    You are insane, Frenchman.

    Comment by SixsixsixSisyphus — November 15, 2007 @ 7:35 am

    Furthermore, it is not actually any sort of decent example of a parody.

    Some people have no developed sense of humor. Where I come from, we call them liberals. Oops, sorry. Progressives.

    Comment by Psykkkheout — November 15, 2007 @ 8:12 am

    So which one of you two gives and which one recieves?

    Comment by Spacebrother — November 15, 2007 @ 2:33 pm | Reply

  67. I guesss Psykkeout is the female in their relationship.

    Comment by Jim — November 15, 2007 @ 2:57 pm | Reply

  68. He loves to get brutalized by the great beast SixSixSixSissypuSS.

    Comment by Jim — November 15, 2007 @ 2:59 pm | Reply

  69. Sissy is the Leader in leather.
    Spankout loves torture (Hence he has also a relationship with Farty MaKKKPain, and with a cactus…..he is Tri-sexual)

    Comment by Jim — November 15, 2007 @ 3:02 pm | Reply

  70. kaka-tuSS

    Comment by Jim — November 15, 2007 @ 3:02 pm | Reply

  71. SpanKKKout,there is a kaka-tuss in Uranus.

    Comment by Jim — November 15, 2007 @ 3:03 pm | Reply

  72. Ednose knows it also very well, he can tell by the smell.
    (and so, you know, he lives in constant hell)

    Comment by Jim — November 15, 2007 @ 3:05 pm | Reply

  73. Sniff the kaka-tuss, Ednose

    Comment by Jim — November 15, 2007 @ 3:06 pm | Reply

  74. Jim, maybe you and Spacebrother should get a room or hook up in a chat room on an IM program. I highly doubt anyone is interested in your witty back and forth banter. Maybe you two should go dribble somewhere else in private. You can tickle each other and giggle and smirk all you want, just don’t do it here, ok?

    It’s really getting tiresome.

    Comment by Psycheout — November 15, 2007 @ 3:38 pm | Reply

  75. “Jim, maybe you and Spacebrother should get a room or hook up in a chat room on an IM program. I highly doubt anyone is interested in your witty back and forth banter. Maybe you two should go dribble somewhere else in private. You can tickle each other and giggle and smirk all you want, just don’t do it here, ok?

    It’s really getting tiresome.”

    Comment by Psykkkeout — November 15, 2007 @ 3:38 pm

    I’ll speak for myself and pass on the menage’ a quad.

    …But that is some funny stuff Jim. LOL.

    It’s funny how these guys will openly insult and degrade people (and alter/edit/censor posts) who they disagree with, but when the same kind of stuff is returned to them, they get all bent out of shape and whine.

    Boo Hoo Hoo Brownbacks gone……….

    LINK DELETED

    [Ed Note: See the Rules. No spam.]

    Comment by Spacebrother — November 15, 2007 @ 4:51 pm | Reply

  76. They are a bit stiff indeed.
    Sixsixsixsisyphus Stiffiphus.
    Sounds like an extinct species.

    Comment by Jim — November 15, 2007 @ 5:33 pm | Reply

  77. Amazing how I somehow forget to hit submit or some such at this site.
    “There’s no accounting for taste, especially when you’re dealing with liberals. Moreover, I’ve already explained it dealt with the general flavor and hidden agenda of liberals, rather than any specific commenter. Except for you, apparently:”
    Yes, my parody of your travesty goes unrecognized. Bravo.
    “Repent, and pray to Jesus that He may show you the way out of your sins.”
    I did, for let’s say, four years. He made me more gay.
    “You are insane, Frenchman.”
    Congratulations on recognizing the obvious origins of my pen, now tell the class what the significance of the name is without using the internet, and you win, well, you win nothing, but I’ll believe that you have any sort of teaching.
    And what I stated is quite true, the utterly ridiculous and overblown claims made in this blog are a perfect example of what a troll does. I would say stereotypes, but the things you said are not even that.
    “Some people have no developed sense of humor. Where I come from, we call them liberals. Oops, sorry. Progressives.”
    In my family, we know them as those who ‘don’t get’ Python.

    [Ed Note: Another Satan reference, perchance?]

    Comment by Armand Jean du Plessis de Richelieu — November 15, 2007 @ 9:37 pm | Reply

  78. “[Ed Note: Another Satan reference, perchance?]”
    Well, if by that you mean “Python”, then no.
    If I were to refer to Satan in such a manner I would’ve used “serpent”.
    As it is, I was referring to a British comedy troupe of the 1970’s who went by the name of a fictitious person that owned a circus that did not quite touch ground.

    Comment by Armand Jean du Plessis de Richelieu — November 16, 2007 @ 12:21 am | Reply

  79. “As it is, I was referring to a British comedy troupe of the 1970’s who went by the name of a fictitious person that owned a circus that did not quite touch ground.”

    Didn’t quite touch the ground, I love that, so that’s why it was called the flying circus. Great bunch in that little troupe, and they all went on to have great careers in comedy, not to mention a few wonderfully idiotic movies that I still laugh at when I see them, so let’s all hop on our wooden horses and ride on out of here in search of the grail.
    And ED BOY thought you meant satan, poor guy, probably never seen any real comedy in his life.

    Comment by Arn Lewis — November 16, 2007 @ 8:27 am | Reply

  80. wow, did he seriously just give away the fact that he doesn’t know who Monty Python is? jesus, dude, they’re one of the most prolific comedy troupes of all time. you can’t just look them up quickly and post about it now, we know that trick. you have my pity, ednote, for you have had a beautiful thing kept from you.

    Comment by Epic Fail Guy — November 16, 2007 @ 9:03 am | Reply

  81. LINK DELETED

    [Ed Note: See the Rules. No spam.]

    Comment by Spacebrother — November 15, 2007 @ 4:51 pm

    Nice censorship you America Hating Cretin. You chumps can’t handle alternate opinions so you edit and/or delete/modify them. You really should move in with Bin Laden, he supports the same activities you practice.

    Comment by Spacebrother — November 16, 2007 @ 9:33 am | Reply

  82. Guess he is actually BLOGZILLA, one of those jurassic creatures that eat different opinions.
    These kind of creatures belong in a museum (or in a cheesy movie), not on the net.

    Comment by Jim — November 16, 2007 @ 9:53 am | Reply

  83. I think you’re right Jim. Blogzilla sound about right. LOL

    Comment by Spacebrother — November 16, 2007 @ 10:54 am | Reply

  84. “he’s not the messiah, he’s a very naughty boy!”

    Comment by Armand Jean du Plessis de Richelieu — November 16, 2007 @ 3:11 pm | Reply

  85. By the way, I just wanted to let you know that your “parody” is nothing at all like what your detractors actually think and feel. If it were, we’d be too busy doing drugs around the campfire to pay your moonbattery any attention.

    Comment by L — December 8, 2007 @ 10:33 pm | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: