Blogs 4 Brownback

November 7, 2007

Sensible Laws for a Better Society

Filed under: Christmas,Family Values,Justice/Law — Psycheout @ 6:11 pm
Tags: ,

Pajamas, a path to pietyA friend of mine recently had reason to visit Minnesota and pointed out one of their state laws which deserves highlighting. In fact, it seems The North Star State may be ahead of the curve on this one. I put it to you that the law in question should be made into a federal law. Specifically, in Minnesota, it is illegal to sleep in the buff. Pajamas, as everybody knows, are worn by the most productive in our nation. Going to bed sans pajamas leads to unhealthy practices. That goes without saying.  Yet I went and said it.

If nothing else, a nationwide law should require all of those under 18 to wear clothing at all times. Think about it. That alone would reduce, if not eliminate, extra-marital teen pregnancies, a nationwide scourge. Teenage nudity leads to temptation. Temptation leads to masturbation and fornication. Fornication outside of wedlock leads to abortion and/or illegitimate children.

Allowing your child to sleep in the nude is to encourage a lifetime of depravity. So it seems that any Christmas or birthday celebration that does not include good sensible flannel pajamas is a missed opportunity to pass along good wholesome family values. Show that you care. Be sure to include pajamas on that gift list.

Minnesota also prohibits oral sex. That is a logical prohibition which should also go nationwide.  The reasons are plenty and obvious.

Some other Minnesota laws include such oddities as prohibiting the crossing of state lines with a duck upon one’s head and the entrance into Wisconsin with a chicken on one’s head. Strange to be sure. I’m not sure what the history is behind those laws. It is also prohibited to loiter around a building without a good reason for being there. That makes a lot of sense. Motorcycle riders must wear a shirt at all times, also sensible.

But the pajamas requirement is what piqued my interest, as I am sure it did yours. Sensible laws for a better society. Do your part and keep America the greatest nation on G-d’s creation. Thank you.

— Psycheout

51 Comments »

  1. If nothing else, a nationwide law should require all of those under 18 to wear clothing at all times.

    What when you´re changing dress? What when you´re taking a bath or a shower?

    Besides, almost no one would really give anything about such a law and simply ignore it.

    Comment by PG — November 7, 2007 @ 6:34 pm | Reply

  2. The Minnesota laws are a good start, but they don’t go nearly far enough. Sex should be illegal unless the participants are a) married heterosexuals, b) using the missionary position, c) are attempting to conceive and d) the lights are out. Any deviation from these norms is just asking for trouble.

    Comment by Fenster — November 7, 2007 @ 7:56 pm | Reply

  3. Wow. You know I used to get a new pair of pajamas every year on Christmas Eve. At least now I know why.

    [Ed Note: You must have very thoughtful parents who care about your soul.]

    Comment by Pie — November 7, 2007 @ 8:11 pm | Reply

  4. You must be reading my mind! I am heading to WalMart tomorrow to pick up eight pairs of PJs for the family for Christmas presents (seven little pairs and one big pair for the hubby). I like to get the shopping out of the way early so that I can focus on the Reason for the Season!

    The hard part is finding children’s PJs that don’t have all those secular, nefarious cartoon characters on them. When my children were babies, it was easy to find PJs with Noah’s Ark or Angels on them. Now it’s all about dangerous characters like Spongebob, who promotes the gay lifestyle, or Dora the Explorer, who promotes tolerance for unfettered immigration, or Bratz, who just look like whores. Not on my children!

    It’s probably time to pick up a new nightgown for myself. I think the one I’m wearing has been around since before I had the twins. It’s getting pretty threadbare in spots. You can practically see right through it. Yes, with the cold winter coming, I think a nice toasty pair of flannel PJs is just what I need. Good night, all! Blessed be!

    Comment by AMarriedLady — November 7, 2007 @ 10:52 pm | Reply

  5. AMarriedLady, good for you. Those cartoon characters are insidious indeed. Just a minor correction, Dora the Explorer promotes tolerance for unfettered immigration AND lesbianism. She’s a twofer for the Leftist Agenda. Maybe a threefer if you count feminism.

    I hope you found a nice new pair of PJs. It wouldn’t do to inadvertantly expose your children to your unspeakables because of a worn-out nightgown.

    Comment by Fenster — November 8, 2007 @ 11:53 am | Reply

  6. I can sleep any way I want. F*CK adding some stupid F*CKING law to tell me what I should wear or not wear to bed. STUPID F*CKING BROWNBACK F*CKING COMMIES. Sounds like big gov’t to me morons. STAY THE F*CK OUT OF MY PERSONAL LIFE AND MOVE TO F*CKING FUDGE-PAKISATAN.

    [Ed Note: What does your foul mouth accomplish? What does it add to your comment? Why can’t you respect our rules when commenting here. Don’t use foul language, please, for the 132nd time.]

    Comment by Spacebrother — November 8, 2007 @ 12:12 pm | Reply

  7. Gee, what an insightful and illuminating post, Spacebrother. I hope you don’t kiss your mother with that mouth.

    Comment by Fenster — November 8, 2007 @ 12:19 pm | Reply

  8. My point is that these psuedo-conservatives support big government and are more aligned with Stalin or Communist China than America. Creating intrusive laws like dictating what to wear to bed is as anti-American as it gets. Anyone who subscribes to and believes anything these idiots who run this place post on this blog sight are as intellectual as cow sh*t.

    Comment by Spacebrother — November 8, 2007 @ 12:59 pm | Reply

  9. “Gee, what an insightful and illuminating post, Spacebrother. I hope you don’t kiss your mother with that mouth.”

    Comment by Fenster — November 8, 2007 @ 12:19 pm

    …and in the words of Dickhead Cheney….

    “GO F*CK YOURSELF!”

    [Ed Note: If you can’t resist gratuitous cussing, you may have to be served an enforced time out. Keep it clean, vulgarian. The asterisk doesn’t make your comment acceptable. You are treading a very thin line.]

    Comment by Spacebrother — November 8, 2007 @ 1:01 pm | Reply

  10. I only sleep naked when it’s unbearably hot out. Oh, and last week when I stayed at my girlfriend’s apartment.

    Comment by Salmo — November 8, 2007 @ 2:43 pm | Reply

  11. “I only sleep naked when it’s unbearably hot out. Oh, and last week when I stayed at my girlfriend’s apartment.”

    Hedonists like this are why tougher laws are needed.

    Comment by Fenster — November 8, 2007 @ 3:47 pm | Reply

  12. “Hedonists like this are why tougher laws are needed.”

    Comment by Fenster — November 8, 2007 @ 3:47 pm

    You are a self-rightous a-hole are’nt you.

    Move to Iran. They’ll embrace you’re moronic wacko views Commie.

    Comment by Spacebrother — November 8, 2007 @ 4:46 pm | Reply

  13. It’s not like we had sex or anything, geez.

    Comment by Salmo — November 8, 2007 @ 8:03 pm | Reply

  14. PJs,, oh yes, now there is one of those very important issues that we need to get submitted to Congress right away before it’s too late.

    Does anyone from this site have a brain. Even through my stupified, marijuana infected little brain I can see that there is something out there that makes people even more stupid than pot, and being Republican obviously has something to do with it.

    [Ed Note: Who’s stupider, the ones writing the posts you claim not to like, or you for coming back again and again for more and more and commenting several times a day? Give it some thought, Annie Lois. Methinks you doth protest too much, sinner.]

    Comment by Arn Lewis — November 8, 2007 @ 8:22 pm | Reply

  15. >>Does anyone from this site have a brain. Even through my stupified, marijuana infected little brain I can see that there is something out there that makes people even more stupid than pot, and being Republican obviously has something to do with it.>>

    In my humble opinion, I think it’s pot that makes one stupid.

    A Married Lady

    Comment by AMarriedLady — November 8, 2007 @ 8:47 pm | Reply

  16. Marriedlady, sorry, but pot has been found to actually help the brain, not hinder it, and these findings have been verified and documented by the most respected Journals in medical science and nuerology. It inhibits the growth of malignant cancer cells, it is used for treatment of Alzhiemer’s disease, it has been shown to slow and even stop the onset of dementia, mad cow disease, and several other degenerative brain disorders. So, no, it doesn’t make anyone stupid.

    [Ed Note: Malignant cancer cells are not a prerequisite for stupidity, dummy. Have you read our posts on drugs and what being on the pot does to your brain? Yours is probably similar to swiss cheese.]

    Comment by Arn Lewis — November 8, 2007 @ 8:55 pm | Reply

  17. Don’t forget, every year more states make it legal for medical treatments. Do you think they are doing that just so they can watch patients get high? No, they do it because the treatments work better than any other medically available treatments.

    Learn a few facts,,, then say something, talking before learning makes you look, how can I put this nicely? Naive.

    Comment by Arn Lewis — November 8, 2007 @ 9:01 pm | Reply

  18. What medical condition are you getting blotto for, stoner?

    Comment by Psycheout — November 8, 2007 @ 9:29 pm | Reply

  19. Arn, you moron. Where are you getting this from? The reason marijuana has been used in cancer cases is as an antiemetic to combat anorexia and nausea, which are associated with chemo. It doesn’t stop cancer. It’s occasionally been used as an anticonvulsant and as a mood alterer. But it’s not the wonderdrug you claim it is.

    Comment by Salmo — November 8, 2007 @ 9:55 pm | Reply

  20. Now can we please get back on the subject of my hot naked girlfriend?

    Comment by Salmo — November 8, 2007 @ 9:55 pm | Reply

  21. “Now can we please get back on the subject of my hot naked girlfriend?”

    I feel sorry for you, Salmo. Lust has blinded you to the dangers of the road you’re traveling (hint: watch out for the nasty pothole filled with a festering stew of venereal diseases).

    Comment by Fenster — November 8, 2007 @ 10:17 pm | Reply

  22. Don’t worry, my venereal parts are quite safe. We’re both disease free. And we’re not having sex, so there’s no risk of pregnancy. She already suffered a miscarriage after her last relationship, which was with an abusive cad, so we’re certainly not rushing that. Thanks for your concern, though. But I’m not in all as much danger as you think. I’m in a loving monogamous relationship with a wonderful woman. And I’m happy.

    Comment by Salmo — November 8, 2007 @ 10:30 pm | Reply

  23. From leftist blog counterpunch: http://www.counterpunch.org/bageant05252004.html

    “I would have to say that conservative Christians actually do what liberals usually only talk about. They visit the sick and the elderly, give generously of their time and money to help those in need, and put unimaginable amounts of love and energy into their families…”

    Liberals, repent. Your clothing ideas are pitiful, and your families are bundles of trash.

    With our superior knowledge for caring for the impoverished, poor, and sinning, we deserve a stop to all of these. I think that we must ban two piece bathing suits and require one pieces for all women. I dream to see the day where all people are not allowed to wear swimsuits at all, because swimwwear= fornication. In fact, all people should be required to wear Eskimo costumes except during procreation so that no private parts will ever have to be shown. Since global cooling is constantly happening, what with Satan’s domain of Antarctica constantly expanding into our small two-dimensional circle, this should not be a problem for rational Americans. Even during a shower, the moonbats can wear their Eskimo costumes in. The cold water should feel good to those idiots believing in ‘global warming’. As a bonus, we would not have to smell that vermin Arn Lewis’s pot-reeking face. I’d like to shoot it off, but unfortunately, I have no knowledge of his location. Given that he is either a Secularist or worships a primitive Asian religion, I am justified in doing this.

    Comment by Bob_Corker — November 9, 2007 @ 4:11 am | Reply

  24. “Arn, you moron. Where are you getting this from? The reason marijuana has been used in cancer cases is as an antiemetic to combat anorexia and nausea, which are associated with chemo. It doesn’t stop cancer. It’s occasionally been used as an anticonvulsant and as a mood alterer. But it’s not the wonderdrug you claim it is.”

    Actually you are the moron. I didn’t say it stops cancer, I said it inhibits its growth, there’s a difference, as for the effects on the brain, those were verified by several studies by some of the most respected research centers in the world, the Journal of Nueroscience (The leading authority on brain disorders)has published its findings on the proposed use of pot for treatment of brain disorders, I suggest you read it and a few others before making any more moronish and misimformed statements, can’t find them, I will supply you with links to their actual reports (not twisted, biased, lying, re-written to my way of thinking copies of reports like you and your cohorts use to “prove” your points)

    Comment by Arn Lewis — November 9, 2007 @ 5:57 am | Reply

  25. [Ed Note: Malignant cancer cells are not a prerequisite for stupidity, dummy. Have you read our posts on drugs and what being on the pot does to your brain? Yours is probably similar to swiss cheese.]

    Yes I read your posts on drugs, and just like everything else you tell lies and offer no proof, most of your links for proof just lead to other blogs (since when are bloggers considered the authority on anything?)and that Lancet report that you folks seemed to love so much was falsified, and was exposed, even the authors of that report admitted it was falsified because they were paid by pharmacuetical companies that made drugs for brain disorder treatments to do the study and make the results favorable for them. The research itself was never done.(the report was a lie, therefore your post on it was the same lie) Everything I said was verified by real research and published in real Journals that don’t falsify their findings to satisfy the moneylenders. Lancet has been caught at it over and over again.
    I’ll bet you don’t want to read the real journal reports, but if you do I will post their links here.

    My swiss cheese brain? I have been smoking pot for almost 40 years, so if it hurts the brain mine should be totally gone by now. Would you be willing to take and compare IQ test scores with me and post the truthful results of both right here? Not one of those quicky IQ tests offered online but a real one with the results verified by the testing angency.I can set it up, and I’m ready (I wont even study anything first) only question is, are you ready to find out who is the real moron here?

    Comment by Arn Lewis — November 9, 2007 @ 6:24 am | Reply

  26. “As a bonus, we would not have to smell that vermin Arn Lewis’s pot-reeking face. I’d like to shoot it off, but unfortunately, I have no knowledge of his location.”

    Ok Bobcock, you’re on,, I’m in Huntington Mills PA, it’s a small place and everyone knows me here so Just ask anyone (even the owners of the store and the post office could give you directions) Now that you no longer have that excuse I’ll be waiting for you.

    Comment by Arn Lewis — November 9, 2007 @ 6:32 am | Reply

  27. “I dream to see the day where all people are not allowed to wear swimsuits at all,”

    Me too, skinny dipping for everyone!

    Comment by Arn Lewis — November 9, 2007 @ 6:34 am | Reply

  28. Dear Miss Lewis,

    I looked up the article in the Journal of Neuroscience which you so helpfully mentioned but forgot to link. The results were fascinating. One point that the study made clear is that smoking cannabis is not advised because the more cannabis in one’s system, worse the results. To quote the leader of the study, “Excessive cannabis use in people with depression poses high risk of psychosis.” Given your painfully obvious struggles with depression and psychosis (along with the fact that it’s illegal and ungodly), I believe it would be advisable to quit smoking it.

    As you boasted above, “if it hurts the brain mine should be totally gone by now.” I believe the scientific evidence you have provided has proved your point.

    Blessed be! (I’m still praying that you’ll find a good husband and turn to the Lord.)

    Oh, and here is how you provide a link. Thus far, I haven’t seen you providing a single one.

    http://www.mcgill.ca/newsroom/news/?ItemID=27677

    Comment by amarriedlady — November 9, 2007 @ 7:05 am | Reply

  29. [Ed Note: Who’s stupider, the ones writing the posts you claim not to like, or you for coming back again and again for more and more and commenting several times a day? Give it some thought, Annie Lois. Methinks you doth protest too much, sinner.]

    I keep coming back because stupidity amuses me and you folks are VERY amusing. Yes, you are being laughed at, and by a lot more people than just me.

    Comment by Arn Lewis — November 9, 2007 @ 7:53 am | Reply

  30. My source was a number of websites devoted to getting marijuana legalized. If your studies had any merit, I’m pretty sure those people would have jumped on them.

    Comment by Salmo — November 9, 2007 @ 7:54 am | Reply

  31. [Ed Note: Malignant cancer cells are not a prerequisite for stupidity, dummy. Have you read our posts on drugs and what being on the pot does to your brain? Yours is probably similar to swiss cheese.]

    This explains why Sisyphus, BJ and Psycheout to name a few are so moronic. And I though you guys were just sniffing each others farts for a buzz (or is it drinking the koolade?).

    Comment by Spacebrother — November 9, 2007 @ 9:29 am | Reply

  32. “Lust has blinded you to the dangers of the road you’re traveling (hint: watch out for the nasty pothole filled with a festering stew of venereal diseases).”

    Comment by Fenster — November 8, 2007 @ 10:17 pm

    Must mean that Fenster does’nt get any and probably is a pedophile.

    Comment by Spacebrother — November 9, 2007 @ 9:32 am | Reply

  33. “I would have to say that conservative Christians actually do what liberals usually only talk about. They visit the sick and the elderly, give generously of their time and money to help those in need, and put unimaginable amounts of love and energy into their families…”

    “Liberals, repent. Your clothing ideas are pitiful, and your families are bundles of trash.

    With our superior knowledge for caring for the impoverished, poor, and sinning, we deserve a stop to all of these. I think that we must ban two piece bathing suits and require one pieces for all women. I dream to see the day where all people are not allowed to wear swimsuits at all, because swimwwear= fornication. In fact, all people should be required to wear Eskimo costumes except during procreation so that no private parts will ever have to be shown. Since global cooling is constantly happening, what with Satan’s domain of Antarctica constantly expanding into our small two-dimensional circle, this should not be a problem for rational Americans. Even during a shower, the moonbats can wear their Eskimo costumes in. The cold water should feel good to those idiots believing in ‘global warming’. As a bonus, we would not have to smell that vermin Arn Lewis’s pot-reeking face. I’d like to shoot it off, but unfortunately, I have no knowledge of his location. Given that he is either a Secularist or worships a primitive Asian religion, I am justified in doing this.”

    Comment by Bob_Corker — November 9, 2007 @ 4:11 am

    Just a couple comments here.

    1. If God intended us to be dressed we’d be born with cloths on.

    2. Claiming superior knowledge is elitist bigoted drivel.

    3. If you are against bathing suits for women, move to Afaggotastan.

    4. Threatening to “shoot someones face off” because they smoke pot or for any other reason exposes you as a terrorist. Once again, move in with Bin Laden, you fit right in.

    5. Stating that it’s justifiable to threaten bodily harm to someone who is “secularist” or an “Asian religion” follower…….well, see the last two comments about moving in with Bin Laden in Afaggotastan.

    6. You’re stupid.

    Comment by Spacebrother — November 9, 2007 @ 9:48 am | Reply

  34. My source was a number of websites devoted to getting marijuana legalized. If your studies had any merit, I’m pretty sure those people would have jumped on them.

    Comment by Salmo — November 9, 2007 @ 7:54 am

    They did, the number one source in the world for information on marijuana law reform is NORML, of which I am a member, and it is their newsletters that link me to these reports in the first place. You should join, maybe you would learn a few things.

    Comment by Arn Lewis — November 9, 2007 @ 10:19 am | Reply

  35. This is truly the funniest website online today. I can’t tell if this is some huge satirical joke on conservativism or not. It’s absolutely brilliant either way. I feel sorry for those getting upset in the talkback…you really should just lay back and enjoy the show.

    Nude.

    Comment by AC — November 9, 2007 @ 10:23 am | Reply

  36. NUDE: Don’t worry, I enjoy the hell out of myself here, and the madder I can make them, the better I like it. Too bad you have to tell the truth to make them mad though, I almost think it would be more fun to argue their side so I could just make sh*t up as I went along.

    Comment by Arn Lewis — November 9, 2007 @ 2:18 pm | Reply

  37. Ooops, sorry AC, I thought you signed it “NUDE” but now I see, you meant enjoy the show in the nude,,, good idea, getting undressed now.

    [Ed Note: Too much information, Ann.]

    Comment by Arn Lewis — November 9, 2007 @ 3:40 pm | Reply

  38. By the way, you are kinda missing the point here, it’s the hot tempers here that keep it amusing, if everyone just kicked back to enjoy the show, the show would end.

    Comment by Arn Lewis — November 9, 2007 @ 3:42 pm | Reply

  39. [Ed Note: Too much information, Ann.]

    you know, when I slap you in the mouth with my d**k you will stop calling me by a girl’s name.

    Comment by Arn Lewis — November 9, 2007 @ 4:19 pm | Reply

  40. Marriedlady, here’s one for you
    Endocannabinoid System Can Be Targeted For New Pharmaceuticals To Treat Depression
    an actual medical site, not a politically motivated one like mcgill, that one has the real story from the Journal, completely unaltered, which the mcgill post was altered.
    If you doubt my word on that, then try this one.
    Free PORN!

    this one is the actual report from the journal of nueroscience on it’s own official website, read it, (the journal is a membership site, I am a member, you can find the unaltered report elsewhere, but there is no way to be positive that it was unaltered, if you want to see it in it’s original form, the only place you can be sure to do that is from the people who did the report, these are them)

    [Ed Note: Embed your darn links, smart gal.]

    Comment by Arn Lewis — November 9, 2007 @ 4:45 pm | Reply

  41. [deleted]

    Comment by Arn Lewis — November 9, 2007 @ 5:12 pm | Reply

  42. [deleted]

    Comment by Arn Lewis — November 9, 2007 @ 5:18 pm | Reply

  43. [deleted]

    Comment by Arn Lewis — November 9, 2007 @ 5:24 pm | Reply

  44. [deleted]

    Pingback by Urgent Prayer Request « Blogs 4 Brownback — November 9, 2007 @ 5:44 pm | Reply

  45. [deleted]

    Comment by spacebrother — November 9, 2007 @ 11:33 pm | Reply

  46. [deleted]

    Comment by Psycheout — November 10, 2007 @ 12:48 am | Reply

  47. [deleted]

    Comment by Spacebrother — November 10, 2007 @ 9:32 am | Reply

  48. “Temptation leads to masturbation and fornication”

    BAHWHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Comment by FMC535 — November 10, 2007 @ 7:42 pm | Reply

  49. So.. if I sleep in women’s undergarments, is that better?
    My boyfriend thinks it’s cute.

    Comment by Armand Jean du Plessis de Richelieu — November 14, 2007 @ 8:09 pm | Reply

  50. So using oral sex as foreplay on your husband/wife prior to ordinary intercourse is wrong too? That’s not what the Pope says–he clearly and specifically states that it’s only wrong if it is used by itself.

    Also, I sleep naked every night, and it does not tempt me to have sex. I only do so because it gets uncomfortably warm in my room in the wee hours of the morning, and because I dislike the feeling of the creases in my pajamas digging into my sensitive skin.

    I don pajamas immediately upon rising, and keep them on until I shower that morning, because I do not wish to indecently expose myself to my loving Christian parents.

    Comment by a TRUE Christian — November 14, 2007 @ 8:46 pm | Reply

  51. Another problem with that law:

    If people are wearing clothing at all times, then how can they change clothes? You have to take off what you were wearing before to put on something else.

    You also have to take off your clothes in order to bathe or shower, so apparently this law will also discourage proper hygene!

    Comment by L — December 8, 2007 @ 10:36 pm | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: