Blogs 4 Brownback

October 16, 2007

Open Religion Thread

Filed under: Open Thread,Religion — Sisyphus @ 9:46 am

Open ThreadWhich religion is more offensive to God- Islam, or Mormonism? Discuss.

(Hint: the real answer is that all religions except Christianity are equally sinful; however, some have sinful practices that are worse than others. For example, the Unitarian practice of reading poems in church, while sinful, is probably not as sinful as human sacrifice or the donning of magical undergarments.)

67 Comments »

  1. Why is reading poetry in church sinful?

    Comment by storbakken — October 16, 2007 @ 10:32 am | Reply

  2. Song of Solomon is considered “poetry.” Poetry is also found elsewhere in the Bible. To say that reading poetry in church is sinful, is to say that reading sections of the Bible in church is sinful.

    Comment by La Mona — October 16, 2007 @ 11:50 am | Reply

  3. “Song of Solomon is considered “poetry.” Poetry is also found elsewhere in the Bible. To say that reading poetry in church is sinful, is to say that reading sections of the Bible in church is sinful.”

    The one time I had the misfortune of attending a Unitarian Church service, a woman read a memorial poem commemorating the death of her cat. To compare any portion of the Bible to that irrelevant tripe is not only blasphemous, it’s insane. Better a thousand kittens die than one word of Scripture be mangled at the hands of aging marijuana-smoking Hippies and their ludicrous, phony, happy-feel-good “church.”

    Comment by Sisyphus — October 16, 2007 @ 12:18 pm | Reply

  4. Clearly the Atheists are worse. If you look at the damage atheists like Joseph Satan, Adolph Hitler, Charles Darwin, Attila the Hun and Ted Kennedy have done even the Mormon horror pales in comparison. Next I’d would say would be the Unitarians because they deny any truth so they enable the Atheists in their blood crazed rampages of perversion and destruction. Then they are the pagans like the Wiccans, Catholics and Buddhists and other non-American religions because they worship Satan and do human sacrifice. Next is the false Christians because they pervert the Lord’s word to their own selfish ends.

    It all really is a matter of degree because our Loving Savior has promised us when He returns He will kill all the wicked, raise them from the dead and then have them toss into Hell for all eternity. Since there is no second place in salvation Mormons, Pentecostals and the like could just as well run naked threw the streets raping and killing people like Atheists do for all the good going to their false churches do.

    It is a pity that all these people can’t see Jesus loves each and every one of them and thinks they are special. But I suppose these sinners just hate Christ and want to see Him cry when He has to order the dumped into the Lake of Fire like so much human landfill. It is sad really.

    Comment by BJ Tabor — October 16, 2007 @ 1:23 pm | Reply

  5. I say the Mormons because they killed that poor Gary Gilmore on my birthday.

    Comment by Roy Ubu — October 16, 2007 @ 1:27 pm | Reply

  6. Poems to cats are paeans to satan. These Unitarians make themselves obvious.

    Comment by Enola Tibbets — October 16, 2007 @ 6:09 pm | Reply

  7. I sincerely hope this post (and the comment by BJ Tabor) is a joke.

    Comment by turtlebutt — October 17, 2007 @ 2:28 am | Reply

  8. “Unitarianism is the belief in the single personality of God, in contrast to the doctrine of the Trinity (three persons in one God).”

    “In Christianity, Trinity is the doctrine that God is one being who exists, simultaneously and eternally, as a mutual indwelling of three persons (not to be confused by “person”): the Father, the Son (incarnate as Jesus of Nazareth), and the Holy Spirit.”

    Are you stating you would prefer to listen to a “God” who has Dissociative identity disorder (commonly known as D.I.D)???
    Clearly people are misinformed, how can someone compare Joseph LaVeyan with a Atheist, I’m unsure how Satanism is connected with Atheist beliefs of “No God”! Hitler is in theory a Satanist as he believes that he was god, which once again tells me your understanding of Atheist beliefs are quite lacking. Charles Darwin was a Christian, he had the theory of natural selection, how is this Atheist??? Ted Kennedy is a Roman Catholic, this is once again not Atheism, if you are calling Roman Catholicism; Atheism, that means you are in theory saying the position of Pope is of the wrong religion.

    Pride is the root of all sin. A thread about debating which religions are wrong is technically a show of Pride, so you are sinning against your religion. (Pride is a virtuos act according to Joseph LaVeyan)

    Comment by Anarchist — October 17, 2007 @ 3:00 am | Reply

  9. People. The answer is “people”. Only they can change the things. So – there are a lot of Moslem crazy terrorists (though our gov spend money on them to keep some of them in line) and there is a stable perversion customs of Mormons, whose religion is just the mixture of Islam and Christian ideas.

    Comment by Lenno Cornish — October 17, 2007 @ 3:03 am | Reply

  10. For the statement a few paragraphs above… the one about chareles darwin being evil!
    You who wrote that must surely not have any bloody brains at all!!
    without the reasurch in which Charles Darwin discovered about genes and the many mysteries in nature. how far do you think we would be in medecin and the understanig of the human body??
    arghhhhhhh i’m soooo sick of all u freaking religious preachers!!! religion is a dieing art! deal with the fact that kidz 2day are given a free choice to belive in the truth instead of lies in which u frakers try to shove down our throught all the time!

    Comment by Angelica — October 17, 2007 @ 5:29 am | Reply

  11. “Mormons, Pentecostals and the like could just as well run naked threw the streets raping and killing people like Atheists do”

    Sonds like you live a ROUGH neighborhood – have you considered moving?

    Comment by indyandy — October 17, 2007 @ 10:21 am | Reply

  12. indyandy @ Sonds like you live a ROUGH neighborhood – have you considered moving?

    I live in a gated community like a proper Christian should. We have enough sense not to allow fanatical thugs who are willing to do anything to force their beliefs on other people into it.

    Comment by BJ Tabor — October 17, 2007 @ 10:34 am | Reply

  13. “Clearly the Atheists are worse. If you look at the damage atheists like Joseph Satan, Adolph Hitler, Charles Darwin, Attila the Hun and Ted Kennedy have done even the Mormon horror pales in comparison.”

    Comment by BJ Tabor — October 16, 2007 @ 1:23 pm

    You’re full of poop. Kennedy is a Catholic and Hitler claimed to be a Christain but you obviously support Nazis. No wonder Jesus hates you BJ.

    Comment by Spacebrother — October 17, 2007 @ 1:06 pm | Reply

  14. “For the statement a few paragraphs above… the one about chareles darwin being evil!
    You who wrote that must surely not have any bloody brains at all!!
    without the reasurch in which Charles Darwin discovered about genes and the many mysteries in nature. how far do you think we would be in medecin and the understanig of the human body??
    arghhhhhhh i’m soooo sick of all u freaking religious preachers!!! religion is a dieing art! deal with the fact that kidz 2day are given a free choice to belive in the truth instead of lies in which u frakers try to shove down our throat all the time!”

    Comment by Angelica — October 17, 2007 @ 5:29 am

    That ridiculous statement is by BJ, the guy Jesus hates the most who is going straight to Hell.

    Comment by Spacebrother — October 17, 2007 @ 1:12 pm | Reply

  15. For the statement a few paragraphs above… the one about chareles darwin being evil!
    You who wrote that must surely not have any bloody brains at all!!
    without the reasurch in which Charles Darwin discovered about genes and the many mysteries in nature. how far do you think we would be in medecin and the understanig of the human body??”

    Darwin was an evil man. He was even more evil than Hitler, or Stalin (who at least had a good idea or two about interrogations and keeping Muslims under control, for example). Darwin is nearly on par with Judas for the damage he did to Christianity. (Granted, Copernicus was even worse.)

    All of these evildoers are currently roasting in Hell. Take care that you do not follow in their misguided footsteps!

    Comment by Sisyphus — October 17, 2007 @ 2:22 pm | Reply

  16. “All of these evildoers are currently roasting in Hell.”

    Comment by Sisyphus — October 17, 2007 @ 2:22 pm

    And you too will be there eventually.

    Comment by Spacebrother — October 17, 2007 @ 2:45 pm | Reply

  17. “In 1000 years, we will either all be atheists, or all be dead”

    By -forget-

    Comment by Jeshua — October 17, 2007 @ 5:26 pm | Reply

  18. The worst religions in the world (and why they are that)

    1.Sisyphusism : an evil cult with only one worshipper who also leads the cult. The cult is based on illogical fingerpointing at the rest of the world (which has once been bad to Sisy when he got molested with a Nintendo joystick at the age of seven, the joystick could never be removed btw.). Sisyphusism also urges people to worship Santa Claus and wants the easter bunny to be the next dictator of the world.

    2.Taborism : based on the teachings of Billie Jean Tabor (Billie Jean is not Michael Jacksons lover, he’s just a girl once he puts on his toupet).cookies in the shape of guns. Taborists distribute gun shaped cookies to little kids and teach them to say Sieg Heilelujah. If kids do not obey orders they can get a severe beating with a very big very holy book.

    3.Hypochristians: read this blog and spot the hypochristians behind the comment-delete-buttons. Feel free to post an answer unless you are a Sisypusist, a Taborist or a Hypochristian.

    Comment by Jim — October 17, 2007 @ 6:03 pm | Reply

  19. Hard to tell, really. Islam and Mormonism at least aren’t ‘pagan’, so they shouldn’t be shot on sight, but rather converted. Mormonism likely, because of polygamy and Mitt Romney. I am convinced that man has superpowers that lets him have gay sex without being gay. YIKES!!

    Comment by Bob_Corker — October 17, 2007 @ 8:56 pm | Reply

  20. i hate sisyphus and bob corker

    Darwin was not an evil man quite the opposite.

    what has he done to Christianity ?
    wtf does natural selection have to do with the theory of evolution ?

    Charles Darwin came up with the theory of natural selection not the theory of evolution.
    His theory of natural selection states that some are better adapted to livng than others, for exemplel i am better adapted to getting along with people and less likely to live like a xenophobic war monger like you sisyphus

    sisyphus i doubt you have many friends and assume everyone will piss on your grave when you die or in your ashes whichever you prefer

    Comment by Tehau — October 18, 2007 @ 3:04 am | Reply

  21. Terrible religions, part

    4.Corkerism : A hyperexaggerated form of Hypochristianity which torments the brain with visions of hellfire and destruction. Can only be cured by removing the cork out of the rear ending of Corkerists.

    Comment by Jim — October 18, 2007 @ 5:58 am | Reply

  22. “i hate sisyphus and bob corker”

    Aw, how cute. You are an impotent little man.

    “Darwin was not an evil man quite the opposite.”

    Well, Darwin was correct on Social Darwinism. However, his evil theories spawned Communism (which even you should hate, and you know they are atheists) and influenced Nazism and eugenics enormously (I’d prefer a Black Christian to a White Atheist anyday of the week, thank you. Negroes may suck at raising families, and often vote Democrat, but they aren’t really in of themselves bad. Interracial marriage probably should be banned among those that make less than $50,000 a year, though.)

    “what has he done to Christianity ?
    wtf does natural selection have to do with the theory of evolution ?”

    “On the Origin Of Species”, moron, for Darwin. Even your Play-doh cradling moonbat supporters will agree with me that he promoted evolution. Natural selection has nothing to do with evolution, you are correct here.

    “Charles Darwin came up with the theory of natural selection not the theory of evolution.
    His theory of natural selection states that some are better adapted to livng than others, for exemplel i am better adapted to getting along with people and less likely to live like a xenophobic war monger like you sisyphus”

    Sisyphus is a brilliant poster. We may disagree on certain things (I see myself as more anti-tax and Christian Reconstructionist than him), but he posts correct stuff, at least. Also, you seem to be one of those moronic women that can’t spell ‘example’ correctly. Go back to your rocking chair, and don’t forget to strap down those breasts!

    “sisyphus i doubt you have many friends and assume everyone will piss on your grave when you die or in your ashes whichever you prefer”

    I’ll let Sisyphus handle this. He’ll be in heaven, so it doesn’t really matter if his grave is defaced, now does it?

    Comment by Tehau — October 18, 2007 @ 3:04 am

    “Terrible religions, part

    4.Corkerism : A hyperexaggerated form of Hypochristianity which torments the brain with visions of hellfire and destruction. Can only be cured by removing the cork out of the rear ending of Corkerists.”

    Jim Crowism: A philosophy advocating segregation of ALL Negroes. Likely duplicated the pancreas at some point during childhood, causing this person to eject garbage out from the rear twice as often as most. Can be cured by execution.

    Comment by Jim — October 18, 2007 @ 5:58 am

    Comment by Bob_Corker — October 18, 2007 @ 4:26 pm | Reply

  23. Are you people for real? I hope for the Senator’s sake this is a parody site like http://ronpaulforums.com

    Comment by Yowsers — October 18, 2007 @ 6:21 pm | Reply

  24. Natural selection has nothing to do with evolution? Have either of you ever taken a class on evolution? Natural selection is how evolution works.

    And ya’ll are seriously crazy.

    Comment by turtlebutt — October 18, 2007 @ 6:46 pm | Reply

  25. lulz “Open” religion thread? labeling all religion except christianity is an open discussion? lmao

    Comment by Spiderman — October 19, 2007 @ 4:18 am | Reply

  26. Jim Crowism etc etc Posted by Bob Corker.

    I agree on all terms, I don’t like Jim Crow either.
    Since both Bob Corker and Jim Crow sit upon their face and speak through their rear ending both religions are regarded as beeing Hypochristian, the poo remains the same.

    Comment by jim — October 19, 2007 @ 4:49 am | Reply

  27. I think its fair to say, any form of radicalism within religion can be dangerous, though I will say this, I have never seen a Mormon, Buddhist or Taoist fundamentalist pick up a gun and shoot someone, I’ve seen, Jewish, Christian, Islamic, Sikh, Pagan and Catholic fundamentalists do it, the most a Mormon fundy would do is force you to accept a copy of the Watch Tower.

    Comment by Rellik San — October 19, 2007 @ 6:30 am | Reply

  28. rellik, you have mormons mixed up with jehovas witnesses.

    and bob corker, the mormons stopped practicing polygamy, what, 150 years ago?

    Comment by Jesse Young — October 19, 2007 @ 8:56 am | Reply

  29. Jesse Young, then why do I hear of ‘Fundamentalist Mormons’ still PRACTICING polygamy? Please explain the arrest of the recent man trying to marry teenage females. The LDS church ‘says’ they don’t practice polygamy, but Mitt Romney leaves his sperm everywhere he possibly can in order to impregnate as many women as he possibly can, and he is a ‘mainline LDS’.

    The belief that Jesus is from Mars is truly bizzare, as well. Young, I think you should get your facts straight.

    And jim, your labeling of ‘poo’ as negative implies racism, since this is frequently used to describe Negroes by secularist libertarians. Hypocrite.

    Comment by Bob_Corker — October 19, 2007 @ 7:44 pm | Reply

  30. Reading poetry in church is sinful?

    Better ban the Psalms from your Sunday service then–they’re poetry.

    Comment by Confused — October 20, 2007 @ 12:32 am | Reply

  31. “The belief that Jesus is from Mars is truly bizzare, as well. Young, I think you should get your facts straight.”

    Ok, this sentance ALONE is enough to deiscredit your entire post.

    How the HECK did you deduce that we beleive that Jesus is from MARS?!?!??!

    That’s the funniest rumor I’ve ever heard.

    As for Mitt, I don’t know too much about him (I’m British), but I’m pretty sure he doesn’t ‘leave his sperm anywhere he possibly can’. Something tells me that’s just another rumor you’re spreading. And no, I don’t like the guy.

    The people who practice polygamy claim to be Mormons, but are, in fact, not. Most belong to some branch-out of the religion, with the media reporting that they are ‘Mormons’, so it’s an understandable misconception. ANY mormon found practicing polygamy, though, is excommunicated from the church.

    Comment by Jesse Young — October 20, 2007 @ 12:46 am | Reply

  32. Oh, and I also find incredible irony in the fact that a person that just told me that we beleive Jesus is from MARS told me to get my facts straight.

    Comment by Jesse Young — October 20, 2007 @ 12:48 am | Reply

  33. Either Joseph Smith was a prophet who was told by G-d that polygamy was a-ok or he was a liar and a fraud. Either Mormonism was right in the beginning (polygamy and all) or it’s wrong now. That’s simple logic. To toss out polygamy was for PR purposes. Moronism is a big fat fraud.

    Comment by Psycheout — October 20, 2007 @ 9:39 am | Reply

  34. Bob Corker, Psychout, Sisyphus, BJ Tybor and a few other idiots herte are completely clueless when it comes to what Christianity and Catholicism are about.

    Simple math……

    Pro-Peace = Christain
    Pro-War = Anti-Christain

    If you are pro-war you are NOT a Christain.

    Comment by Spacebrother — October 20, 2007 @ 1:37 pm | Reply

  35. Buddhism, while misguided in other respects, is correct about one thing: Selfish desires cause suffering.

    Confucianism, while not technically a religion, makes the correct statement of “Do not do unto others what you do not want done to you.”

    While Christianity is the only religion that contains the whole truth about man’s soul and destiny, clearly other religions and philosophies at least have tiny bits of it right. The only one that doesn’t have the slightest shred of truth to it is Scientology, and that’s because it was created for the sole purpose of making L. Ron Hubbard rich.

    Also: Mark 6: 1-2. Religious fanaticism lowers you to the level of al-Quaeda.

    Comment by Confused — October 20, 2007 @ 1:56 pm | Reply

  36. “Bob Corker, Psychout, Sisyphus, BJ Tybor and a few other idiots here are completely clueless when it comes to what Christianity and Catholicism are about.

    Simple math……

    Pro-Peace = Christain
    Pro-War = Anti-Christain

    If you are pro-war you are NOT a Christain.”

    I’m going to start calling you guys CHRINOs.

    Comment by Spacebrother — October 20, 2007 @ 3:17 pm | Reply

  37. “indyandy @ Sonds like you live a ROUGH neighborhood – have you considered moving?

    I live in a gated community like a proper Christian should. We have enough sense not to allow fanatical thugs who are willing to do anything to force their beliefs on other people into it.”

    Wow, guess I’m going to Hell then, for not having the money to afford a two-million-dollar-house, and therefore not being able to live in a gated community.

    Not that I mind, because if people like you live in gated communities, they must be full of “fanatical thugs who are willing to do anything to force their beliefs on other people.” At least I don’t denounce people for learning things.

    Comment by a TRUE Christian — October 21, 2007 @ 11:45 am | Reply

  38. @Young: Well, you do say he is from another planet. And you think Jesus and Satan are brothers. You are definitely perverting Christianity.

    @Spacebrother: I’m antiwar, lardo.

    The only true Christians are those in the CHRISTIAN PARTY. Which, I feel, should be incorporated into mainstream politics.

    Comment by Bob_Corker — October 21, 2007 @ 7:23 pm | Reply

  39. 2007 and still talking “my religion is bigger than yours”. Like that would make you better in any way. true Christians. My kingdom for a Christian wo tries to follow what Christ taught, for a change.

    Comment by Kyle Rayner — October 21, 2007 @ 11:56 pm | Reply

  40. “I’ll let Sisyphus handle this. He’ll be in heaven, so it doesn’t really matter if his grave is defaced, now does it?”

    Not to mention that my body will be Raptured up. I won’t even be in it.

    “My kingdom for a Christian wo tries to follow what Christ taught, for a change.”

    What’s your kingdom, a Burger King outlet? I follow the tenets of Christianity, please hand it over and make me some chicken tenders.

    Comment by Sisyphus — October 22, 2007 @ 5:49 am | Reply

  41. You follow everything in that book that should be regarded as ancient uncivilized men’s behaviours and prejudice, and manage to positively discard every useful teaching there is in it. Well done. Luckily enough there’s probably no Hell to speak of, so you should be fine. Alas, no chicken for you.

    Comment by Kyle Rayner — October 22, 2007 @ 7:25 am | Reply

  42. I feel that Kwaanza is an abomination unto God, myself. Negroes are always creating awkward traditions just to anger the Lord. I suppose the curse of Ham is apparent in all Negroes. I’m sure Spics have some terrible religion as well, but since they suck at business, we will never have their horrid klaptrap hoisted upon us. Praise the lord, and vote for someone in the style of George Wallace!!! https://blogs4brownback.wordpress.com/2007/04/05/rudy-giuliani-abortion-today-abortion-tomorrow-abortion-forever/ (Segregation meant less abortions.)

    Comment by Bob_Corker — October 22, 2007 @ 8:48 am | Reply

  43. Go R.J. Rushdoony and Gary North!

    Comment by Bob_Corker — October 22, 2007 @ 10:43 pm | Reply

  44. “@Spacebrother: I’m antiwar, lardo.

    The only true Christians are those in the CHRISTIAN PARTY. Which, I feel, should be incorporated into mainstream politics.”

    Comment by Bob_Corker — October 21, 2007 @ 7:23 pm

    Glad to hear it. So Ru Paul can count on your vote then because the rest of the Republican candidates are pro-war, pro-corporate and pro-greed.

    Comment by spacebrother — October 23, 2007 @ 12:29 am | Reply

  45. “I feel that Kwaanza is an abomination unto God, myself. Negroes are always creating awkward traditions just to anger the Lord. I suppose the curse of Ham is apparent in all Negroes. I’m sure Spics have some terrible religion as well, but since they suck at business, we will never have their horrid klaptrap hoisted upon us. Praise the lord, and vote for someone in the style of George Wallace!!! https://blogs4brownback.wordpress.com/2007/04/05/rudy-giuliani-abortion-today-abortion-tomorrow-abortion-forever/ (Segregation meant less abortions.)”

    Comment by Bob_Corker — October 22, 2007 @ 8:48 am

    You really need to shed your racist views and accept everybody as equals. I find it hard to believe that you really are antiwar but have blatant far-right, neo-conservative, theocratic fascist Brownback/Bush/Huckabee type views.

    Comment by spacebrother — October 23, 2007 @ 12:35 am | Reply

  46. Sisyphus: You obviously haven’t heard the famous speech by the late Pope John Paul II, in which he uttered the famous sentence, “War never again.” How can you be Catholic and pro-war?

    Also, Luke 6:27-35. Discuss.

    Comment by a TRUE Christian — October 23, 2007 @ 7:52 am | Reply

  47. “I feel that Kwaanza is an abomination unto God, myself.”

    No argument here.

    “War never again.” How can you be Catholic and pro-war?”

    War and just war are not the same thing. You’ll note he never said “Just war never again.” Stop trying to distort his remarks to serve your heinous pacifist agenda.

    Comment by Sisyphus — October 23, 2007 @ 8:58 am | Reply

  48. “War and just war are not the same thing. You’ll note he never said “Just war never again.” Stop trying to distort his remarks to serve your heinous pacifist agenda.”

    Ha Ha Ha.
    You know, it’s all right not to agree, you should just make up your own religion, write your own bible, name your own profet. Jesus is already taken. And christian religion has already enough modernity issues of his own, without putting in discussion principles like “Thou Shall Not Kill”.

    Comment by Kyle Rayner — October 23, 2007 @ 10:09 am | Reply

  49. I worry for your soul, Kyle.

    Comment by Sisyphus — October 23, 2007 @ 11:45 am | Reply

  50. I worry for your soul, Kyle.

    Nice way of not saying anything.

    [Ed Note: I worry for your soul too. That’s saying something.]

    Comment by Kyle Rayner — October 23, 2007 @ 11:50 am | Reply

  51. [Ed Note: I worry for your soul too. That’s saying something.]

    Not really. Not when used to avoid an objection. “You shall not kill” and “just war” are not compatible concepts. Unless I have it wrong and it’s “you SHOULD not kill”, which I guess would make it right to do it once in a while.

    [Ed Note: Actually the proper translation is “Thou shalt not murder.” Changes things a bit, doesn’t it? The many examples in the Old Testament of killing sanctioned by God, are quoted in defense of the view that “murder” is more accurate. Furthermore, the Hebrew word for “kill” is “הרג” – “harog”, while the Hebrew word for “murder” is “רצח” – “retzach”, which is found in the Ten Commandments “לא תרצח” – “lo tirtzach”.]

    Comment by Kyle Rayner — October 23, 2007 @ 1:04 pm | Reply

  52. “ratsah is employed in Numbers 35:27-30 both when dealing with an authorized case of blood vengeance, and with capital punishment–neither of which falls under the legal category of murder”

    Comment by "Kyle Rayner" — October 23, 2007 @ 2:19 pm | Reply

  53. “ratsah is employed in Numbers 35:27-30 both when dealing with an authorized case of blood vengeance, and with capital punishment–neither of which falls under the legal category of murder.”

    Comment by Kyle Rayner — October 23, 2007 @ 2:20 pm | Reply

  54. Sisyphus, I feel there are other, practical reasons for opposing the war, and not because of reasons set forth by Spacebrother and the rest of his Myung Moonbats. I’m only antiwar because:

    1. I, you, and everyone else would get huge tax deductions that much quicker.
    2. These tax deductions could be used to bankrupt the federal government.
    3. Without a federal government, rule reverts to communities.
    4. Christians, being the majority religion nearly everywhere, can easily set the Biblical Law into code.
    5. No more welfare to fund abortions for poor people (mostly Negroes). This will reduce abortion. Since we see homeless people living in their wretched status for decades, we don’t have to worry about any deaths.
    6. Islam Bears are not about to convert, and they can kill themselves much easier.
    7. I’d love to nuke Iran etc. etc., but I worry about the power of the UN. Those United Nations inbreds would love to nuke America at the slightest excuse they get. Star Wars, though an excellent idea, may not be able to defend us on two fronts.

    However, I do think that for Jesus to come, the world must be majority or all Christian. I’m postmillenialist, I thought Catholics were too, but I might be confused.

    Anyways, Jesus said he came to fulfill the Law and the Prophets, not abolish them, as so many moonbat Christians would put forth. Bring back the Law, so Jesus may come, already!

    Comment by Bob_Corker — October 23, 2007 @ 6:15 pm | Reply

  55. @#46

    Mark 16:16. Discuss. False Christians, Jews, and Muslims technically haven’t outright blashphemed, so they can be converted. I don’t THINK they have disavowed the Holy Spirit, although some Conservative Christians need to validate. We are trying to do good by converting our enemies and telling them to listen to God’s Word. Now is not really the time to be discussing whether or not sacraments are valid or not, as both Catholic and Evangelical need to bring as many to understand God’s Word as possible.

    Are you a mainline Protestant? Well, then you aren’t a Christian. The Iraq War brains are either this, or of Judaism, also a cult. Episcopalians were formed over a stupid divorce suit by a fornicator insisting on a son, the PCUSA has strayed from God’s teachings on women and gays, and Methodists have Hillary Clinton. Not to mention that all of these people are ‘theistic evolution’ or whatnot. Pentecostals are making a mockery of our religion, anyways. The rock music their teenagers listen to is absolutely horrid: several songs have only 2 chords. The Lord deserves more than their 15-minute thoughts.

    Are you saying that you somehow have refuted Matthew 5:17?? That should settle this.

    Comment by Bob_Corker — October 23, 2007 @ 6:29 pm | Reply

  56. @ sisyphus
    your not going to get raptured and im gunna b richer than u when i grow up

    and im probably mor elikely to be raptured than you and im not even christian

    [Ed Note: Kids say the darndest things!]

    Comment by Tehau — October 24, 2007 @ 3:14 am | Reply

  57. “Sisyphus, I feel there are other, practical reasons for opposing the war, and not because of reasons set forth by Spacebrother and the rest of his Myung Moonbats. I’m only antiwar because:

    1. I, you, and everyone else would get huge tax deductions that much quicker.
    2. These tax deductions could be used to bankrupt the federal government.
    3. Without a federal government, rule reverts to communities.
    4. Christians, being the majority religion nearly everywhere, can easily set the Biblical Law into code.
    5. No more welfare to fund abortions for poor people (mostly Negroes). This will reduce abortion. Since we see homeless people living in their wretched status for decades, we don’t have to worry about any deaths.
    6. Islam Bears are not about to convert, and they can kill themselves much easier.
    7. I’d love to nuke Iran etc. etc., but I worry about the power of the UN. Those United Nations inbreds would love to nuke America at the slightest excuse they get. Star Wars, though an excellent idea, may not be able to defend us on two fronts.

    However, I do think that for Jesus to come, the world must be majority or all Christian. I’m postmillenialist, I thought Catholics were too, but I might be confused.

    Anyways, Jesus said he came to fulfill the Law and the Prophets, not abolish them, as so many moonbat Christians would put forth. Bring back the Law, so Jesus may come, already!”

    Comment by Bob_Corker — October 23, 2007 @ 6:15 pm

    So you two (Adolf Corker and Stalinphus) sport your white capes and hoods. Your racism and hatred are shameful.

    Do America and yourselves a favor and move to Aphganistan or better yet, kill yourselves. Jesus hates you anyways.

    Comment by Spacebrother — October 24, 2007 @ 3:44 pm | Reply

  58. “The only true Christians are those in the CHRISTIAN PARTY. Which, I feel, should be incorporated into mainstream politics.”

    Comment by Bob_Corker — October 21, 2007 @ 7:23 pm

    See previous comment about you moving to Afganistan. Jesus hates you ButtCork.

    Comment by Spacebrother — October 24, 2007 @ 3:46 pm | Reply

  59. ““War never again.” How can you be Catholic and pro-war?”

    War and just war are not the same thing. You’ll note he never said “Just war never again.” Stop trying to distort his remarks to serve your heinous pacifist agenda.”

    And attacking a country that had nothing to do with the terrorist attacks that were perpetrated against us, just because it happens to have a bad leader, is just now? Funny, I know some Vietnam vets who would call that “stupidity” and “failure to learn from experience.”

    Comment by a TRUE Christian — October 28, 2007 @ 6:49 pm | Reply

  60. “I’m postmillenialist, I thought Catholics were too, but I might be confused.”

    I’m Catholic, and I’ve never even heard of that term before. All I know is the following things will happen at the end of the world:

    Jesus will come to bring everyone to the seat of judgment. The dead will rise from their graves, and all mankind will “meet the Lord in the air” before being sent to their eternal reward, eternal punishment, or Purgatory, depending on the nature and severity of any unconfessed sins. The world will be destroyed, and a new Heaven and Earth will be created. Satan will be defeated, and God and the righteous (not the self-righteous–those were cast into Hell) will enjoy a new, pure, happy world for all eternity.

    If you’re referring to Rapture theory, that was created by a heretical preacher in the 18th century, and wasn’t taken seriously by anyone until very recently, because most intelligent Christians realize it’s a bunch of baloney that bears no relation to Scripture.

    Comment by a TRUE Christian — October 28, 2007 @ 6:57 pm | Reply

  61. “Mark 16:16. Discuss. False Christians, Jews, and Muslims technically haven’t outright blashphemed, so they can be converted. I don’t THINK they have disavowed the Holy Spirit, although some Conservative Christians need to validate. We are trying to do good by converting our enemies and telling them to listen to God’s Word. Now is not really the time to be discussing whether or not sacraments are valid or not, as both Catholic and Evangelical need to bring as many to understand God’s Word as possible.”

    War is not a sacrament. Go back to 2nd grade CCD/PSR and learn what the Seven Sacraments are before you try to twist my words into an attack on my beloved Church.

    “Are you a mainline Protestant? Well, then you aren’t a Christian.”

    I’d prefer to give them the benefit of the doubt. I’d hate to think my mother is the only one on her side of the family going to Heaven.

    “The Iraq War brains are either this, or of Judaism, also a cult.”

    Well, obviously. If they were Catholic, they wouldn’t have started a war against Iraq in the first place. QED, as they say in the mathematical community. (FYI: QED stands for “Quod est demonstratum,” Latin for “It has been proven.”)

    “Episcopalians were formed over a stupid divorce suit by a fornicator insisting on a son,”

    Duh. Just because Henry VIII hated his wife, doesn’t mean all Episcopalians are like him. I’ve known a few rather nice Anglicans myself. Not to mention that for several centuries, British law forced the entire country to convert to the C of E or die. Very few people are brazen enough to say “You know what? The king made an unjust law, so I’m not going to follow it.” That’s the whole reason why the Pilgrims came to America in the first place.

    “the PCUSA has strayed from God’s teachings on women and gays,”

    I know they accept homosexuality, but I’ve never heard that whole women thing. What teachings on women, exactly?

    “and Methodists have Hillary Clinton.”

    As I said before, judging an entire religion by one member is the worst kind of stereotype. Feel free to argue against the Methodists when you have something more substantial than an ad hominem attack against one of its members.

    “Not to mention that all of these people are ‘theistic evolution’ or whatnot.”

    And? The Pope himself has said that Christianity and a belief in evolution are not irreconcilable. I personally believe that all those “mutations” were God’s hand at work.

    “Pentecostals are making a mockery of our religion, anyways.”

    No arguments here. A Pentecostal tried to convert people at my college once. He did nothing but spew fire and brimstone the entire time. Some girls walked by in scandalously short skirts and tiny tops and he said “You just know they’re Catholic.”

    “The rock music their teenagers listen to is absolutely horrid: several songs have only 2 chords.”

    Trust me, the Top 40 list is worse.

    “The Lord deserves more than their 15-minute thoughts.”

    People restrict God to 15 minutes?

    “Are you saying that you somehow have refuted Matthew 5:17?? That should settle this.”

    Settle what? What does Christ fulfilling the Old Testament promise of a Messiah have anything to do with my argument? More logic, fewer strawmen, please.

    Comment by a TRUE Christian — October 28, 2007 @ 7:15 pm | Reply

  62. “@Young: Well, you do say he is from another planet. And you think Jesus and Satan are brothers. You are definitely perverting Christianity.”

    Now, look here. PLEASE, try to do al least a LITTLE bit of research before you start making such ridiculous claims. NO, we do NOT beleive that he comes from another planet. We never have, and we never will. Try not to spread lies, just because you may not like the religion.

    On the other hand, you are correct in your other point. We beleive that we are all God’s children, including Satan before he was cast out.

    I hope that is enough of an explanation for you. Also understand that something that is different from your point of view does not ‘defile’ it.

    Comment by Jesse Young — October 30, 2007 @ 5:34 am | Reply

  63. Jesse: You’re wasting your time. The mere fact that your viewpoint differs even one iota from theirs means that they will not bother listening to you.

    *prays that God may open the hearts and minds of all who wear spiritual blinders*

    Comment by a TRUE Christian — October 31, 2007 @ 4:55 pm | Reply

  64. @a TRUE Christian.

    Heh, thanks, I’ll keep that in mind.

    Comment by Jesse Young — November 7, 2007 @ 8:59 am | Reply

  65. Personally, I think the single thing most damaging to God is God himself. It’s a real hook: “Join me or I’ll kill you!” 8B And then he gives us ‘free will’ but smites us for using it (playing video games or being gay). Yeah. Sign me up.

    Comment by Bob — November 25, 2007 @ 11:59 am | Reply

  66. Hmmm, sometimes I wonder why I am just a Christian and not a fundamentalist, now I know why. The problem with fundamentalists (which a number of you clearly are) is that they believe that they are God’s chosen people and that everyone who doesn’t agree with them on every issue is going straight to hell. Hey, you probably think that I’m evil just because I’m fairly open-minded. I’m not a Mormon but Mormons are clearly Christians and I can’t believe that you’re actually talking about them as if they are other people. There are some atheists that have committed true evils on the world, but the same can go for Christians. Fundamentalist Christians blow up abortion clinics, plus in history we have committed atrocities such as the Spanish Inquisition and the Crusades. Problems in this world are not caused by one particular religion, they are caused by hatred, something that many of you on both sides of the aisle have preached in this blog.

    Comment by Taylor Richert — June 15, 2008 @ 5:48 pm | Reply

  67. I’m the only one in this world. Can please someone join me in this life? Or maybe death…

    Comment by Phettearf — April 23, 2009 @ 8:18 pm | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: