Blogs 4 Brownback

October 8, 2007

Swank Nails “Greasy Giuliani”

Filed under: Election 2008,RINOs,Rudy Giuliani — Psycheout @ 7:00 am

J. Grant SwankThere’s so many great columnists over at Town Hall and The Corner that I don’t always find the time to read J. Grant Swank and Marie Jon’. That’s a pity because our friend Pastor Swank nailed Rudy Giuliani hard on Friday. Be sure to read the whole thing: Greasy Giuliani Slips Through Every Tight Hole.

Fact: He vowed to three wives he would love and cherish them till death. Not. Go figure. The man is greased from head to toe.

Therefore, with evangelicals despising him—that is, most of them despise him, give or take a few who don’t know his immoral positions as pro-choice and pro-homosexual—it just could happen that if elected President, Giuliani could come around to “see the Light.” Maybe. A long shot. But. . .

Anything is possible with that slippery one. If it serves his purpose in his moment, he will baptize it as legit. He’s well oiled. He’s old enough to have crafted the style to its shiny surface.

He’s “well oiled” all right. Yet for some reason many Republicans seem ready to throw their core principles overboard in a lemmings’ rush to anoint him as the next GOP candidate. If he loses, we end up with Hillary Clinton. If he wins, the GOP will be destroyed for a generation. Conservatives simply lose either way. It’s not a choice I want to have to make. Yet it’s what we’re stuck with if slippery Giuliani fools conservatives and somehow worms his way into the nomination.

Pastor Swank continues:

[H]e married with holy vows Wife Number One. Did he remain faithful? Not. He changed his mind.

He married with holy vows Wife Number Two. Did he remain faithful? Not. He changed his mind.

Now married with holy vows to exceedingly like-opportunistic liberal Wife Number Three, will he remain faithful? Don’t count on it.

He brought children into this world. Did he keep them in his league as faithful, honorable father? Not.

When Roman Catholic, he promised God to keep the rules. Did he keep the rules? Not. Did he remain loyal to his church, no matter the political consequences? Not.

And on and on it goes. Point by point, Pastor Swank demonstrates how unreliable and untrustworthy and just plain liberal Rudy really is. Be sure to note the horrible consequences if Republicans foolishly make RINO Rudy their nominee:

He could turn on evangelicals with that Hitler stare, crippling their every testimony with liberal agendas that would enthrone the devil himself. In other words, he would ensconce his win as payback time against evangelicals who cut him off at the knees. And he could do it—with Third Wife’s gleeful assistance.

The two of them are archliberals into as much devilment in the name of religion as Hillary Clinton. So the choice between Giuliani and Hillary is sick.

The choice between those two calculating career politicians is no choice at all. It’s just not right. Don’t fall for the “electability” scam. If Rudy’s the answer, the question was a stupid one. Is it really winning if the victor supports a liberal agenda? No it’s not.

Just say no to “Greasy Giuliani.” Don’t let him slip and slide his way into the GOP nomination. The destruction of the Republican Party just isn’t worth it. Think about it.

Update: Rudy praises a Clinton/Obama ticket. Why? Because he’s as liberal as they. Don’t let him fool you.

“I believe she [Hitlery] will be the nominee, and Senator Obama will be the vice presidential nominee…that’s the candidacy we are going to be facing, and that is a very formidable candidacy,” he said in an interview conducted late last week.

“He[Obama]’s kind of earned it,” Giuliani said. “He brings a kind of enthusiasm to the ticket that everyone desires and likes to have.”

Furthermore, he clearly advocates throwing conservative principles out with the bathwater. Don’t listen to this snake oil salesman. This huckster is as phoney as a three dollar bill.

He called Republicans “underdogs” in the 2008 race for the White House and said the party would have to abandon its “old playbook” [social conservatism] if it hopes to win in the election, 13 months away.

Thanks but no thanks for your misguided advice, Rude-E. With “conservatives” like Giuliani, who needs liberals?

— Psycheout


  1. For all that´s holy, don´t nominate this guy. He could actually win!

    Comment by PG — October 8, 2007 @ 10:41 am | Reply

  2. Vote for Ru Paul instead.

    Comment by Spacebrother — October 8, 2007 @ 2:21 pm | Reply

  3. Jewliani will be great.. just not for OUR nations interests. Foreign nations that want us to bomb their enemies back into the stone age will be well pleased though.

    Oh.. also abortionists, mutinational corporations, cross-dressers, sarah brady, and a good part of the original cast of `CATS`..

    Comment by freedom isnt free — October 8, 2007 @ 10:31 pm | Reply

  4. Good point, freedom. Giuliani definitely only appeals to the Christian Right through his embracing of the free market, private property, and the support of the existence of Israel. (We also agree on the size of the military, although the Christian Right is non-interventionist.) It is not America’s job to nanny other countries. Indeed, we really need to kick the secular neocons out of the Republican Party: they seem to have fascist Mussolini-style economics (adding a bit of morality to appeal to their voter base, but not really caring about us). NAFTA absolutely must go. Brownback seems much less interventionist than most of the neocons, though, which is why I support him. (Ron Paul’s values are the closest to mine, but he lobbies far too much for his district.)

    Comment by Bob_Corker — October 9, 2007 @ 4:04 pm | Reply

  5. You actually have made a few points here I agree with Bob Corker except for the statement…

    “Brownback seems much less interventionist than most of the neocons, though, which is why I support him.”

    Brownback is an extremist far right neo-con who will keep us at constant virtual war.

    Ru Paul, Dennis Kucinich and Mike Gravel are the only real Americans running for office. They are also the only ones not funded by corporate special interests.

    Comment by spacebrother — October 9, 2007 @ 5:08 pm | Reply

  6. Spacebrother, you really didn’t go to the Ron Paul house link I posted, do you? Or do you also support the unification of church and state? If so, then welcome.

    What I find annoying is the bloc in the Republican Party that says “We must support Israel.” Have you ever seen a neoconservative picket an abortion clinic? I haven’t. They attempt to pass legislation, but it always seems to be just a scheme. Nonsense. God has abandoned the Israelites for their refusal to accept Jesus Christ. Not only that, Revelation has an optimistic, not fiery, ending. God will grant us a golden age after the second coming of Jesus. The conversion of Christianity is each country’s own responsibility. In fact, St. Augustine mandates against war as a whole. I did support the invasion of Afghanistan, though. The Taliban worship a false God, and women seem to be viewed as incapable of tending to family. Not to mention that Bin Laden is an ass. We all know where Bin Laden is hiding, the US government has known where he is hiding, and they have refused to act, since his death would mean that we would have to withdraw our troops from the Middle East. But you’re a 911 ‘Truther’, right? Ha!

    If we can convince Brownback to become more anti-immigration, he will be a shoo-in. Ron Paul’s withdrawal from Iraq seems implausible to me, as much as I like his anti-war statements.

    Also, I would label neocons neosocialists. After all, they are converts from the Left. Although Bush has correctly fought welfare, which encourages atheism, many neocons seem to support some New Deal programs, like Social Security. Christianity requires church, family, and self government. There is not much need for government aside from military, law enforcement, and road building.

    Comment by Bob_Corker — October 9, 2007 @ 7:39 pm | Reply

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: