Blogs 4 Brownback

September 25, 2007

Just Nuke Him

Filed under: Defending America,Foreign Policy,Terrorism,War on Terror — Sisyphus @ 7:45 am

Mahmoud AhmadinejadI can’t stand this whiny little swine.

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad questioned the official version of the Sept. 11 attacks and defended the right to cast doubt on the Holocaust in a tense appearance Monday at Columbia University, whose president accused the hard-line leader of behaving like “a petty and cruel dictator.”

Columbia President Lee Bollinger and audience members took Ahmadinejad to task over Iran’s human-rights record and foreign policy, as well as Ahmadinejad’s statements denying the Holocaust and calling for the disappearance of Israel.

Ahmadinejad smiled at first but appeared increasingly agitated, decrying the “insults” and “unfriendly treatment.”

We should’ve dropped the bomb on him then and there, and killed two birds with one stone. Now we’ll have to wait until he gets back to his theocracy before we bomb it back into the Stone Age it never really left in the first place. Or, we could wait until he heads to the rat nest:

Bollinger was strongly criticized for inviting Ahmadinejad to speak at Columbia. The Iranian presdent was in New York in advance of his address to the U.N. General Assembly on Tuesday.

New York City is the lair of deviants and traitors. It is inexcusable that they would allow Ahmedinabadman to breathe American air. He should’ve been shot down in his plane before he left international waters on his way here.

I do have to give him credit for this, though.

Asked about executions of homosexuals in Iran, Ahmadinejad said the judiciary system executed violent criminals and high-level drug dealers, comparing them to microbes eliminated through medical treatment. Pressed specifically about punishment of homosexuals, he said: “In Iran we don’t have homosexuals like in your country.”

With the audience laughing derisively, he continued: “In Iran we do not have this phenomenon. I don’t know who’s told you that we have this.”

It makes me envious of the noble Iranian people. After we’ve killed their oppressors, nuked their nukes and converted them all to Christianity, we’ll have to help them keep the Sodomites out at the borders. Then they can be one of the most Christian of nations, and America’s staunchest ally after Israel and Iraq.

That is my dream. Mock it if you must, moonbats, but I’m quite used to enduring your sneers and derision by now.

44 Comments »

  1. I think he should also be praised for wanting to wipe Isreal off the map.

    Isn’t that an important step in the final comming of Our Lord?

    We should pray that Iran gets the A-Bomb so that the final battle can begin.

    Comment by Happy Clam — September 25, 2007 @ 8:06 am | Reply

  2. “I think he should also be praised for wanting to wipe Isreal off the map.

    Isn’t that an important step in the final comming of Our Lord?”

    Yes, but there’s nothing in the Bible about Iran doing the job.

    “We should pray that Iran gets the A-Bomb so that the final battle can begin.”

    Let’s pretend they already have it, and nuke them now. If the fallout affects Israel, God’s will be done. He controls the prevailing wind currents, not America and not Ahmamadman.

    Comment by Sisyphus — September 25, 2007 @ 8:13 am | Reply

  3. “In Iran we don’t have homosexuals like in your country.”

    yeah, right! Just like the Soviets didn’t have drug use or AIDS – at least until they were gone, then, SUDDENLY, Russia was swarming with them. Kinda makes you thinkt that they had been their all along, despite the goverenment’s denials, doesn’t it?

    “It makes me envious of the noble Iranian people. After we’ve killed their oppressors, nuked their nukes and converted them all to Christianity, we’ll have to help them keep the Sodomites out at the borders. Then they can be one of the most Christian of nations, and America’s staunchest ally after Israel and Iraq.”

    Ah, yes – another one of your fantasies that is COMPLETELY ‘undisturbed’ by reality! Whatever the Iranians may think of their current rulers, they are a fairly proud & unified people who would react to an attack of the sort that you propose with a level of patriotic fervor to match what happened here after 9/11. As for their becomming Christians en masse any time soon…

    Comment by indyandy — September 25, 2007 @ 8:26 am | Reply

  4. “I think he should also be praised for wanting to wipe Isreal off the map.

    Isn’t that an important step in the final comming of Our Lord?”

    Yes, but there’s nothing in the Bible about Iran doing the job.

    “We should pray that Iran gets the A-Bomb so that the final battle can begin.”

    Let’s pretend they already have it, and nuke them now. If the fallout affects Israel, God’s will be done. He controls the prevailing wind currents, not America and not Ahmamadman.

    Comment by Sisyphus — September 25, 2007 @ 8:13 am

    I knew you guys were the real WHITE POWER supporters. Wanting Israel to be destroyed is Nazi rhetoric at it’s root. You guys are a stain on society and should just leave America. You 2 suck.

    Vote for Ron Paul.

    Comment by Spacebrother — September 25, 2007 @ 8:42 am | Reply

  5. “yeah, right! Just like the Soviets didn’t have drug use or AIDS – at least until they were gone, then, SUDDENLY, Russia was swarming with them. Kinda makes you thinkt that they had been their all along, despite the goverenment’s denials, doesn’t it?”

    The chaos of the post-Cold War probably allowed most of it to get in.

    “Ah, yes – another one of your fantasies that is COMPLETELY ‘undisturbed’ by reality! Whatever the Iranians may think of their current rulers, they are a fairly proud & unified people who would react to an attack of the sort that you propose with a level of patriotic fervor to match what happened here after 9/11. As for their becomming Christians en masse any time soon”

    I have supreme faith that once their leadership is replaced, their patriotism and love will lead them to Jesus.

    Comment by Sisyphus — September 25, 2007 @ 10:54 am | Reply

  6. “I knew you guys were the real WHITE POWER supporters. Wanting Israel to be destroyed is Nazi rhetoric at it’s root. You guys are a stain on society and should just leave America. You 2 suck.”

    No, letting God kill people who don’t reject him is completely different from Nazis like you, who want to kill both Christianity AND Jews.

    “Vote for Ron Paul.”

    Vote for White Power.

    Comment by Sisyphus — September 25, 2007 @ 10:56 am | Reply

  7. I am still besides myself with rage that a liberal institution like Columbia allowed this EVIL man I am still besides myself with rage that a liberal institution like Columbia University allowed this EVIL man Ahmadinejad to speak in America! Don’t these moonbats know that Ahmadinejadis 1/3 the Axis of Evil with Kim Jong-Il and Hugo Chavez? These three men are plotting to destroy freedom so the last thing we want is to hear them speak.

    They are EVIL people! Wake up!

    Look at how deluded the treefrogs are; they laugh at Ahmadinejad. Don’t they know Ahmadinejad is an evil man! Evil men are not to be laughed at. Would they laugh at Adolph Hitler? No, evil men should be feared and loathed, not laughed at like some monkey in a zoo flinging its’ filth around.

    Monkeys in zoos don’t have armies of suicide bombers ready to destroy our nations elementary schools!

    Sissyphus is 110% on target on this one; Ahmadinejad is evil, period end of discussion He was behind 911 and he should be nuked with the biggest weapon we have in our arsenal. Only once they are free of Ahmadinejad can the Iranians take their place in the modern world as a Christian free market economy country.

    Comment by BJ Tabor — September 25, 2007 @ 11:27 am | Reply

  8. I don’t laugh at him. But I do think that listening to him speak to American students can provide insight we can’t get from watching him speak to his own subjects or to world leaders.

    Comment by Salmo — September 25, 2007 @ 11:33 am | Reply

  9. I think we should all want to move to Iran now after his speech. After all, he did say that there are no homosexuals in Iran. That’s one problem solved.

    Now, if only we could do something about those damn Muslims there…

    Comment by Fascinated and Confused — September 25, 2007 @ 12:55 pm | Reply

  10. “Monkeys in zoos don’t have armies of suicide bombers ready to destroy our nations elementary schools”

    so true, so true.

    The threat of IslamoFascism has never been clearer. These peoople only understand force and we need to create a flaming wall of death around all our schools and churches. That is the only thing that will stop them.

    Comment by Happy Clam — September 25, 2007 @ 1:02 pm | Reply

  11. “The threat of IslamoFascism has never been clearer. These peoople only understand force and we need to create a flaming wall of death around all our schools and churches. That is the only thing that will stop them.”

    Amen.

    Comment by Sisyphus — September 25, 2007 @ 2:41 pm | Reply

  12. A flaming wall of death? What?

    “I think we should all want to move to Iran now after his speech.”

    A neocon wanting to live in a country that squashes the rights of its citizens under religious bureaucracy? Hmm, somehow I’m not surprised.

    Comment by Adam Nelson — September 25, 2007 @ 3:48 pm | Reply

  13. “A flaming wall of death? What?”

    If that’s what it takes to keep our children safe, then that’s what we must do.

    Comment by Sisyphus — September 26, 2007 @ 5:34 am | Reply

  14. Of course he says there are no homosexuals in Iran, the Muslim men are all sodomites so there is no word for it there.

    Comment by Enola Tibbets — September 26, 2007 @ 7:21 am | Reply

  15. The Muslim men are all sodomites?

    Do you actually think about what you say before you say it? It seems your mental process is “sodomite = bad, Muslim = bad, therefore Muslims are sodomites!” I mean, do you realize how stupid you sound when you just throw unrelated words together in a sentence?

    Comment by Adam Nelson — September 26, 2007 @ 10:25 am | Reply

  16. “…and America’s staunchest ally after Israel and Iraq.”

    Instant classic, thanks for that one.

    Comment by THeDRiFTeR — September 26, 2007 @ 2:11 pm | Reply

  17. “I knew you guys were the real WHITE POWER supporters. Wanting Israel to be destroyed is Nazi rhetoric at it’s root. You guys are a stain on society and should just leave America. You 2 suck.”

    No, letting God kill people who don’t reject him is completely different from Nazis like you, who want to kill both Christianity AND Jews.

    “Vote for Ron Paul.”

    Vote for White Power.

    Comment by Sisyphus — September 25, 2007 @ 10:56 am

    Actually I want everyone to live in peace and comfort regardless of their beliefs.

    Only Nazi’s, Fascists, Commies, religious fanatics and bigots want to close all dialog and start wars.

    At the very least Mahmoud Ahmadinejad came here to open a dialog (something that Bush is too much of a coward to do) but the corporate controlled media has so many sheeple programmed to believe what the world banks tell them.

    The level of ignorance astonishes me.

    Ron Paul is the only Republican who has it right.

    Kucinich and Gravel are the only Democrats who have it right too.

    The rest of both parties support corporate greed and war.

    Comment by Spacebrother — September 26, 2007 @ 2:34 pm | Reply

  18. Yes, he is very evil. But between him and bush, who invaded a country to steal their oil?

    Comment by Larry — September 26, 2007 @ 2:51 pm | Reply

  19. I’m a dem, vote Ron Paul

    Comment by Larry — September 26, 2007 @ 2:52 pm | Reply

  20. Yes, he is very evil. But between him and bush, who invaded a country to steal their oil?

    We just reclaimed what was pre-stolen from us Christians. Ahmadinejad is secretly invading Iraq to steal the oil back that Christ created for us Christians. Ahmadinejad is an evil thief.

    Comment by BJ Tabor — September 26, 2007 @ 3:59 pm | Reply

  21. This whole Iran thing is an excellent opportunity for us Christians. It is high time we reclaim the Holy science of radiation from the secularist who pervert it to prove their lie of a 4.5 billion year old earth. Radiation is for one thing and one thing only; making hydrogen bombs to destroy Jesus’ enemies. All this talk of “radiometric dating”, “radioactive decay” and “hot young earth” is all perverted talk from geeky scientist to unpleasant to get dates with women. Instead they project their dirty thoughts onto geology to come up with these blasphemous ages for the earth.

    Put radiation back in The Bomb were it belongs!

    Comment by BJ Tabor — September 26, 2007 @ 4:40 pm | Reply

  22. Christ created oil, eh? When did he do that? And while we’re at it, last time I checked any of the various versions of the bible, Jesus never visited Iraq, Iran, or any nation other than his own.

    And lastly BJ, do you even understand what the term radiation means? If so, please define it for me.

    Comment by Curiouser and Curiouser — September 26, 2007 @ 4:53 pm | Reply

  23. We just reclaimed what was pre-stolen from us Christians. Ahmadinejad is secretly invading Iraq to steal the oil back that Christ created for us Christians. Ahmadinejad is an evil thief.

    Comment by BJ Tabor — September 26, 2007 @ 3:59 pm

    Nobody owns the earth fool. We belong to it. The earth has been around for millions of years before Christ and will be here long after all living and spiritual existence regardless what any Religio-Fascist says.

    We should never have went into Iraq period and it’s long overdue to pull out ALL of the troops.

    Comment by Spacebrother — September 26, 2007 @ 4:53 pm | Reply

  24. Good for those new york jews,..
    who will sue anyone who tries to stop a public act of gay sex `performance art`,
    or, who doesnt like seeing a crucifix in a jar of urine,
    or, who cant find any mention of partial birth abortion in the bill of rights,…

    thankfully these jews are able to put aside their usual anything goes attitude (as imposed on others) for once, and seek to silence free speech on behalf of THE GUY WHO SAYS STUFF THEY DONT LIKE… (althought they`ll still sue you for objecting to NAMBLA`s convention being in your town)

    Comment by freedom isnt free — September 27, 2007 @ 12:34 am | Reply

  25. BJ, does the bible even mention fossil fuels? I thought it was Jesus who mentioned that a longing for possessions was bad, and here you are taking things from everybody.

    Comment by Adam Nelson — September 27, 2007 @ 5:59 am | Reply

  26. Adam @ BJ, does the bible even mention fossil fuels? I thought it was Jesus who mentioned that a longing for possessions was bad, and here you are taking things from everybody.

    We Christians long for nothing Adam; Jesus sees to it that all our needs are fulfilled. If there is any problem it is because Satan is stealing from us out of jealousy. Simple justices says we can talk back what is rightfully ours.

    Spacebrother @ Nobody owns the earth fool.

    Jesus does friend. He just gives us Christians stewardship over parts of it.

    Curiouser and Curiouser @ And lastly BJ, do you even understand what the term radiation means? If so, please define it for me.

    Radiation is the force put out by angels God has placed in atoms so we can smite His enemies once we perform the correct ritual. All this talk about “half-life” and what not is superstitious nonsense made by a bunch of weirdoes living in the desert in the ‘40s. I mean Albert Einstein though the Soviet Union was a good thing so that shows you how suspect his ideas are.

    Comment by BJ Tabor — September 27, 2007 @ 10:28 am | Reply

  27. Just for the record:

    ra·di·a·tion
    n.
    1.The act or process of radiating:the radiation of heat and light from a fire.
    2.Physics
    a.Emission and propagation and emission of energy in the form of rays or waves.
    b.Energy radiated or transmitted as rays, waves, in the form of particles.
    c.A stream of particles or electromagnetic waves emitted by the atoms and molecules of a radioactive substance as a result of nuclear decay.
    d.The act of exposing or the condition of being exposed to such energy.
    e.The application of such energy, as in medical treatment.
    f.The spread of a group of organisms into new habitats.
    g.Adaptive radiation.
    3.a.The act of exposing or the condition of being exposed to such energy.
    b.The application of such energy, as in medical treatment.
    c.The spread of a group of organisms into new habitats.
    d.Adaptive radiation.
    4.Anatomy Radial arrangement of parts, as of a group of nerve fibers connecting different areas of the brain.
    5.a.The spread of a group of organisms into new habitats.
    b.Adaptive radiation.

    I think you have your definition a little skewed.

    Comment by Curiouser and Curiouser — September 27, 2007 @ 11:46 am | Reply

  28. Relax. BJ Tabor is a spoof.

    Comment by ed — September 27, 2007 @ 3:19 pm | Reply

  29. Sisyphus, I’m curious about Ron Paul. Just because lib-tards like Rosie-o-Donnell support him doesn’t mean that he’s left wing, since after all they have brains equivalent to a squirrel. He might just be able to convert America to Christianity very rapidly, since he is staunchly pro-life and would criminalize homosexuality. In the mean time, Bush has not pushed his faith-based initiative hard enough. Considering the money needed to fund the war in Iraq, wouldn’t Brownback fail here, too? America needs to be 100% Christian, and under Christian law, before we turn our attention to the outside. THEN, with a secure domestic front, we can strip government of all power except for military and police. There is no moral wrong in our foreign policy; it just isn’t the best tactical solution to Christianize America yet. If we advocate nuclear weaponry, all other countries except Israel might become hostile against us, and indeed Christianity. Go to the Chalcedon foundation for their opinions.

    Comment by Bob_Corker — September 27, 2007 @ 5:13 pm | Reply

  30. Wasn’t it Jefferson who said that the greatest drain on a society was the priest, and that religion should never, ever be sponsord by the government? Seems like the founding fathers were onto something there…

    Comment by Adam Nelson — September 27, 2007 @ 7:59 pm | Reply

  31. BJ Tabor “schooled” every treefrog on this thread. Anything I could say would only be redundant.

    Comment by Sisyphus — September 27, 2007 @ 10:40 pm | Reply

  32. Sisyphus, I’m curious about Ron Paul. Just because lib-tards like Rosie-o-Donnell support him doesn’t mean that he’s left wing, since after all they have brains equivalent to a squirrel. He might just be able to convert America to Christianity very rapidly, since he is staunchly pro-life and would criminalize homosexuality. In the mean time, Bush has not pushed his faith-based initiative hard enough. Considering the money needed to fund the war in Iraq, wouldn’t Brownback fail here, too? America needs to be 100% Christian, and under Christian law, before we turn our attention to the outside. THEN, with a secure domestic front, we can strip government of all power except for military and police. There is no moral wrong in our foreign policy; it just isn’t the best tactical solution to Christianize America yet.

    Comment by Bob_Corker — September 27, 2007 @ 5:13 pm

    Conservatives will NEVER embrace an anti-war candidate like Ron Paul. People who call themselves Christains and support pro-war candidates are Pharisees.

    Besides Ron Paul, there are only two other candidates who GET IT. They are Dennis Kucinich and Mike Gravel.

    Comment by spacebrother — September 28, 2007 @ 3:03 am | Reply

  33. BJ Tabor “schooled” every treefrog on this thread. Anything I could say would only be redundant.

    Comment by Sisyphus — September 27, 2007 @ 10:40 pm

    Come on down to Jonestown. I hear the koolades great.

    Comment by spacebrother — September 28, 2007 @ 3:05 am | Reply

  34. “America needs to be 100% Christian, and under Christian law, before we turn our attention to the outside.”

    If America was 100% Christian, we would have probably lost WWII. So there you go.

    Comment by Salmo — September 28, 2007 @ 9:19 am | Reply

  35. “Sisyphus, I’m curious about Ron Paul. Just because lib-tards like Rosie-o-Donnell support him doesn’t mean that he’s left wing, since after all they have brains equivalent to a squirrel.”

    True, I’ll give you that last point. It does insult squirrels a little, but that’s alright with me.

    “He might just be able to convert America to Christianity very rapidly, since he is staunchly pro-life and would criminalize homosexuality. In the mean time, Bush has not pushed his faith-based initiative hard enough. Considering the money needed to fund the war in Iraq, wouldn’t Brownback fail here, too?”

    No. Your reasoning is fine until you get to this point. Brownback is too Christian to fail in this manner. God will look out for His shepherd.

    “America needs to be 100% Christian, and under Christian law, before we turn our attention to the outside. THEN, with a secure domestic front, we can strip government of all power except for military and police. There is no moral wrong in our foreign policy; it just isn’t the best tactical solution to Christianize America yet.”

    O ye of little faith, with God all things are possible!

    “If America was 100% Christian, we would have probably lost WWII. So there you go.”

    This patent absurdity is just what we’ve all come to expect from the lib-tards.

    Comment by Sisyphus — September 28, 2007 @ 10:33 am | Reply

  36. If America was only Christians, we wouldn’t have Einstein or Oppenheimer. So we wouldn’t have the bomb. So there, as I said, you go.

    Comment by Salmo — September 28, 2007 @ 2:36 pm | Reply

  37. “America needs to be 100% Christian, and under Christian law, before we turn our attention to the outside.”

    Wasn’t there a comment not that long ago that called Iran evil because it was a theocracy?

    Comment by Curiouser and Curiouser — September 28, 2007 @ 5:33 pm | Reply

  38. Curiouser and Curiouser @ Wasn’t there a comment not that long ago that called Iran evil because it was a theocracy?

    What do you have against Christianity Curiouser? It sounds like you are one of the Neo-pagan white supremest anti-Semite racists. Shame on your bigotry sir!

    Comment by BJ Tabor — September 28, 2007 @ 7:17 pm | Reply

  39. Sisyphus, why are you giving condolences to squirrels? Is your pre-Democrat side still hanging around with you? We were made to give dominion over the squirrels, thus it is impossible to insult them. In the noble, Christian state of Kentucky, where it is illegal to marry your wife’s grandmother (why have other states not implented this law?), squirrel brain is a delicacy.

    Now, I feel that the only function the government should have is to uphold Biblical Law. Anything else is a foolish distraction. That includes this war, which does not seem to have produced more Christians, but rather let the atheist oil companies and the agnostic cement factories profit.

    I trust Brownback, but the Constitution Party analysis of the GOP candidates say that Brownback says that he could support a pro-choice candidate as a vice-president, and Brownback seems too noble and Christian to lie.

    As for foreign policy, the war was started by Bush, whos’ adviser (Karl Rove) attacked evangelicals. Why should I support an administration policy that mocks my faith? Brownback, I realize, does want to get the troops out of that heathen country, but Paul seems to have proposed a better solution.

    The CP is unwaveringly Christian, and it supports Ron Paul. So does the Chalcedon foundation and Christian Institute for Economics. So, Sisyphus, Ron Paul is at least a vice-president for Sam Brownback.

    Oh, and if America was 100% Christian, we would have been able to warn the Lutheran German people that Hitler was actually a neopagan filth, pandering to the Catholic church while beating Catholics up.

    Comment by Bob_Corker — September 30, 2007 @ 1:31 pm | Reply

  40. Hitler was neopagan? Since when?

    Anyway, your article mentions the stone age. But that never existed, remember?

    Comment by Mr.Pumpkin — September 30, 2007 @ 6:15 pm | Reply

  41. BJ @ 38

    That’s a bold statement. I’m just asking why a theocracy is evil if it’s not christian, but if it’s Christian it’s not.

    Theocracy is theocracy.
    That’s all I’m saying.

    Comment by Curiouser and Curiouser — October 1, 2007 @ 11:54 am | Reply

  42. Mr.Pumpkin @ ”Hitler was neopagan? Since when?”

    He was a Catholic.

    Curiouser and Curiouser@ ”That’s a bold statement. I’m just asking why a theocracy is evil if it’s not Christian, but if it’s Christian it’s not.”

    That should be obvious. A non-Christian theocracy is about forcing religion down societies throat. A Christian theocracy is about guiding society to the Christian faith. Remember we Christians do believe in religion, we want people to have faith.

    Comment by BJ Tabor — October 1, 2007 @ 4:42 pm | Reply

  43. BJ Tabor, the helioleftists have probably lied about this as well. If Hitler were Catholic, he would either be a good Conservative like Sam Brownback, or possibly some loser that doesn’t actually ATTEND the church. Catholicism is indeed to be questioned, based on their acceptance of Galileo and Darwin, but they aren’t to be associated with this neopagan filth. There are many Catholics that believe in God’s REAL word, and they should not be hated.

    Also, the death rate between people killing each other has greatly increased since the old days. Jesus briefly provided a period of respite, but it seems that we are still sinners, judging by Christian deaths.

    Note also the intervention policy was started by that vermin Woodrow Wilson, a Democrat and a liberal. The neoconservative adoption of SOME of the liberal policies is not to be accepted. Liberals are wrong, and in every way. Government exists only to serve justice and to protect our borders; the church and the family do a better job of maintaining education/health care/welfare (although people on welfare are going to hell, of course), and the Church should pass laws. When befuddled with these bureaucracies that the Neocons want, we spend more time on government and less on Christianity.

    Liberals, read some of R.J. Rushdoony or Gary North for a change.

    Comment by Bob_Corker — October 2, 2007 @ 9:31 pm | Reply

  44. No Nukes in Iran. Just another KKKooKKKy KKKoolade wacKKKo right wing neo-KKKon lie exposed by the CIA.

    Comment by Spacebrother — December 13, 2007 @ 1:52 pm | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: