Blogs 4 Brownback

September 10, 2007

Liberal Brain vs. Conservative Brain

Filed under: Media Bias,Science — Psycheout @ 4:52 pm

SchizoA new study reveals what most of us have known instinctively: liberals have brain damage.  It has recently been demonstrated that liberals have a flaw in the brain that makes them indecisive while conservatives manage to remain resolute in their minds.

This explains moral relativism and the tendency towards flip-flopping.  It also explains why liberals have no principles whatsoever.

Of course its interesting to see how the liberal media spins this, using words like “sensitive” and “flexible” to compensate for the deficiency in liberal brains.  These are PC terms much like “differently abled” to describe retards.

Perhaps this new study will lead to identification of liberals and medical treatments for them at an early age.  Perhaps once the liberal gene is discovered, this preventable permanent vegetative disorder can at last be wiped out altogether.

— Psycheout

25 Comments »

  1. Seems to me that the “schizo” brain is the conservative one, as they’re always the ones making up the vast Liberal conspiracies, the Liberal Mainstream Jewish Controlled Media, fluoridated mind-control water, etc. etc. Last time I checked, hearing voices in your head and extreme paranoia are all schizophrenic traits.

    Ergo, neocon = mental retard

    Comment by Adam Nelson — September 11, 2007 @ 7:13 am | Reply

    • That’s weird, it seems to me that back during the Clinton administration, Hilary said there was a vast right-wing conpiracy. And then Bill Clinton said the same thing during the Obama campaign. And I believe it’s the leftist libs that are the “9/11 truthers.” The ones that think there was a giant right-wing conspiracy that blew up the buildings to go after the oil (left we never took). And, it’s the liberal left that has all of the moon landing conspiracy kooks. Wow, sounds pretty Schizo to me.

      Comment by JohnnyFreedom — November 4, 2009 @ 12:53 pm | Reply

  2. About damn time someone realized this. How about we coin the term “Liberally Abled”?
    This also explains why liberals want to legalize drugs, and expand Medicaid coverage.
    They’re just desperate for medical help!
    Well, baby Jesus helps those who help themselves.

    (And none of this “genetics” devil talk Don Psycheout. We all know that genetics, evolution, and gravity are inventions of the librul secular agenda.)

    Heterosexually yours,
    Fitness

    Comment by fitnessfortheoccasion — September 11, 2007 @ 9:04 am | Reply

  3. I don’t believe any of this nonsense. Liberalism is a character defect, not a medical condition.

    First they start by claiming that liberalism is naturally occurring, then they come up with “evidence” that homosexuality is natural. I don’t believe any of it.

    The liberals are sinners, plain as day. Stop trying to justify their behavior.

    Comment by Fascinated and Confused — September 11, 2007 @ 9:10 am | Reply

    • Liberalism may be a character defect, but the blog is about hard evidence that the brain is also ‘broke’. It is simply unable to function correctly. Science has, through x-rays and MRIs, I presume, proved that there is structural deformation in the liberal brain. Something like this will be impossible to keep quiet. I know my doctor and he will make sure a conservative journal publishes it. Many doctors are conservative- every one I go to has to be to get my business. It will be all over the world by Monday I bet. It’s about time!

      Comment by Conserv21112 — October 2, 2011 @ 10:37 pm | Reply

  4. Fascinated and confused is right on this one; liberals need to take some personal responsibility for themselves and stop trying to excuse their behavior because of “brain damage”. As Sisyphus pointed the usefulness of the brain is greatly over exaggerated by secularists. Liberals need to look in a mirror and admit to themselves they are the ones who create their own problems.

    Comment by BJ Tabor — September 11, 2007 @ 9:27 am | Reply

  5. Thank goodness for people who “flip-flop” and remain open to facts and learning. Otherwise, we’d all still adamantly argue that the world was flat, despite evidence to the contrary, just so we wouldn’t look weak or unresolute. Pathetic.
    I pity anyone who believes that everything they know today is all they need to know and will never change their mind even if they *gasp* learn something new.
    Conservative ideology has plenty to be proud of over the liberal mentality. Unwillingness to admit wrongs and ignoring evidence that contradicts their beliefs is not one of them.

    Comment by dana — September 11, 2007 @ 9:54 am | Reply

  6. “Thank goodness for people who “flip-flop” and remain open to facts and learning. Otherwise, we’d all still adamantly argue that the world was flat, despite evidence to the contrary, just so we wouldn’t look weak or unresolute. Pathetic.”

    The world IS flat, moonbat. We discussed it on our science thread.

    Comment by Sisyphus — September 11, 2007 @ 10:02 am | Reply

  7. Sorry to break it to you, but Jesus was a liberal.

    Comment by C. S. Brooks — September 11, 2007 @ 10:07 am | Reply

  8. Must have missed that one.
    So has everyone here believed their whole life that the world was flat? Or did you ever believe what you were taught in school? If you ever agreed it was round and then changed your mind when, ummm, science prevailed, then please join the happy ranks of the flip floppers.
    I am the first to say that school education was inadequate and often skewed. Which is why I am determined to keep learning the rest of my life.
    Perhaps I AM wrong and the world IS flat (or for arguments sake, any number of topics we might disagree on). Wouldn’t me admitting that I was wrong involve me flip flopping? Do I change my mind now because you’ve proven me wrong, or do I stay resolute because you’ve told me that changing one’s mind is a defect and shameful. I think I’ll continue with my beliefs no matter what you say so that I won’t be considered disabled.
    This page feels like a joke. I hope it is and I’m just a sucker for playing along.

    Comment by dana — September 11, 2007 @ 10:16 am | Reply

  9. Yes, Dana.

    As Sisyphus said, the world IS flat and, in addition, I believe we agreed the ether that makes up outer space consists of either water or blueberry jam, rendering spaceflight impossible unless your spacecraft is constructed out of toast.

    Comment by Fascinated and Confused — September 11, 2007 @ 10:51 am | Reply

  10. Sorry, I don’t know where this thread is so I’m not privy to what was already said. Sounds like a real hoot. ha.
    It really has nothing to do with my point. My argument is not about whether or not the world is flat but the contradiction in criticizing flip floppers.
    Conservatives criticize liberals for being both a) wrong in their beliefs and b) wrong for flip flopping. So which is it? Do you want them to change their mind or not? For them to adopt conservative ideology, they’d have to change their mind … a quality you’ve belittled extensively.
    Seriously, am I being Punk’d?

    Comment by dana — September 11, 2007 @ 11:00 am | Reply

  11. The topic of this thread is whats known as fuzzy logic. Don’t believe any of the nonsense spewed by people who run blogs. They criticise science but then use 100% nonfactual junk science to attempt the feeble-minded into believing their nonsensical views.

    This is the same mentality that thinks the Iraq war is going just peachy hence “mission accomplished”, “in their last throes”, “nuclear mushroom cloud”, “Nigerian yellowcake”, “Saddam was responsible for 9/11”, “Bin Laden is dead” and “heckuva job Brownie” in regards to hurricane Katrina.

    As an independant who defected from the Republican party, it’s this logic thats driving people away in droves. It’s these people causing the Exodus from the Republican party.

    Artificial facts, censorship, fuzzy logic and revisionisism are the tools of Communists, Fascists, Nazis and Brownback supporters.

    Comment by Spacebrother — September 11, 2007 @ 11:30 am | Reply

  12. Ether is a scientific concept. An incorrect and archaic one, but scientific nonetheless. Also, Answers in Genesis tells its followers not to argue for a flat earth, because it makes the rest of them look just as stupid as these bloggers.

    Comment by Adam Nelson — September 11, 2007 @ 11:54 am | Reply

  13. Also, Answers in Genesis tells its followers not to argue for a flat earth, because it makes the rest of them look just as stupid as these bloggers.

    Answers in Genesis are a bunch of false Christians who think you are allowed to lie about God’s word to unbelievers. If we believe the earth was created in seven days because it says so in The Bible then it would be damn hypocritical not to believe the earth is flat or the sun revolves around the earth.

    Comment by BJ Tabor — September 11, 2007 @ 1:24 pm | Reply

  14. “If we believe the earth was created in seven days because it says so in The Bible then it would be damn hypocritical not to believe the earth is flat or the sun revolves around the earth.”

    I suppose so. The solution is to believe what your eyes and science and common sense tells you, and accept that the Bible, while a fine moral authority, is not entirely accurate on science..

    Comment by Salmo — September 11, 2007 @ 2:20 pm | Reply

  15. My eyes lie to me, people lie to me Salmo. The only place I can get the truth is from the Bible. Only God has no reason to lie to me.

    Comment by BJ Tabor — September 11, 2007 @ 3:38 pm | Reply

  16. “My eyes lie to me, people lie to me Salmo. The only place I can get the truth is from the Bible. Only God has no reason to lie to me.”

    Classic catastrophic paranoia. “Everybody’s out to get me but my imaginary friend!” Such is the lament of the emotional retard.

    Comment by Adam Nelson — September 11, 2007 @ 5:42 pm | Reply

  17. “A new study reveals what most of us have known instinctively: liberals have brain damage. It has recently been demonstrated that liberals have a flaw in the brain that makes them indecisive while conservatives manage to remain resolute in their minds.”

    Please cite the exact words or phrases in the study that indicate that liberals are indeed the ones identified as brain-damaged. To paraphrase a popular Internet saying: Quotes or it didn’t happen.

    Comment by Confused — October 20, 2007 @ 2:54 pm | Reply

  18. Idiot christian garbage …but yes dana this site is parody

    Comment by Benway — October 31, 2007 @ 1:10 pm | Reply

  19. I would like some data from the LIBs…

    What percentage of Homo’s are LIB’s?

    Not just how they vote on Homo things but do they have the mind of a typical LIB…

    Some LIB may be able to get some Gov cash to study this but I bet I know the answer.

    Is this a statistical indicator that proves that LIBs who dont consider themselves as gay are defective in some other way?

    Its a good question, no?

    We may not have a political choice here. It may be that your born a LIB like your born a homo.

    Could it be that many of the LIBs who dont consider themselves as gay are in fact BI or some other strange thing that we havent figured out yet?

    Comment by Bob Kent — November 27, 2007 @ 2:34 pm | Reply

  20. This is what Science has to say on the subject: http://politicalinquirer.com/2008/04/01/psychiatric-association-recognizes-liberal-disease/

    Comment by Hugo — April 3, 2008 @ 7:58 am | Reply

  21. This is hilarious.

    A scientific study comes out with evidence that Conservative thinkers can’t process complex information and you’re all on here cheering about it like it’s a *good* thing?

    I guess the huge insult to conservatives latent in this study is a bit too subtle.

    Comment by SocialistNutter — October 8, 2008 @ 3:55 pm | Reply

  22. SocialistNutter,

    BRAVO!

    Comment by Hugo — October 12, 2008 @ 10:07 am | Reply

  23. That’s weird, it seems to me that back during the Clinton administration, Hilary said there was a vast right-wing conpiracy. And then Bill Clinton said the same thing during the Obama campaign. And I believe it’s the leftist libs that are the “9/11 truthers.” The ones that think there was a giant right-wing conspiracy that blew up the buildings to go after the oil (left we never took). And, it’s the liberal left that has all of the moon landing conspiracy kooks. Wow, sounds pretty Schizo to me.

    Comment by JohnnyFreedom — November 4, 2009 @ 12:49 pm | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: