Blogs 4 Brownback

August 27, 2007

Sinners and Saxophones: A Match Made in Hell


This proves my point about woodwind instruments. The video is quite evil; I should warn you of its pornographic qualities. Please keep your young children from watching this saxophone play, it may corrupt them forever.

Anyone who thinks this isn’t obscene needs to have their eyes examined. Satan lurks in every frame of this filth. I only post it because it proves my point.

Is there anything more corrosive than sinful music played by sinful harlots?  (H/t:  BJ Tabor)

49 Comments »

  1. LOVE that band!

    Comment by Bob Baffet — August 27, 2007 @ 6:09 pm | Reply

  2. If it’s so sinful then why did you post it on your front page?

    This only furthers the argument you’re substituting “puritan” for “family”

    Comment by Geremy Tibbles — August 27, 2007 @ 6:17 pm | Reply

  3. “If it’s so sinful then why did you post it on your front page?”

    Sin thrives on secrecy, Geremy. The best way to counter it is to confront it openly.

    “This only furthers the argument you’re substituting “puritan” for “family””

    ???

    Comment by Sisyphus — August 27, 2007 @ 6:36 pm | Reply

  4. I personally can testify to the sinfulness of this video after Jesus had me watch it fifty times. Every single frame shows a harlot performing the most depraved acts. I pray to our merciful Savior to order His angles to erase the disgusting the scenes at 2:35, 2:35, 1:07 from ever copy of this video on the Internet, DVD, MPEG, Tape or any other copy!

    Comment by BJ Tabor — August 27, 2007 @ 6:42 pm | Reply

  5. I too watched it 50 times, sister Tabor, and then my idle hands–which are indeed the devils playthings–played, uh, my own saxophone. I had some mad sax. Doesn’t get any hotter than that sax. I’m bringing saxy back.

    Evil evil evil! Especially the scene at 2:35. I observed that one a lot.

    -YIROFLOLMSAOBBQC, Donkspeedonkadonkatron

    Comment by donkspeedonkdonk — August 27, 2007 @ 8:54 pm | Reply

  6. What about the bassoon?

    Comment by Pinko Punko — August 27, 2007 @ 9:40 pm | Reply

  7. “Sin thrives on secrecy, Geremy. The best way to counter it is to confront it openly.”

    if they wanted secrecy, they wouldn’t have made a video in the first place!😉

    Comment by indyandy — August 27, 2007 @ 10:06 pm | Reply

  8. That’s quite clearly European. Just another example of the decline western morality into decadance, caused by the push for secularism by liberals.

    Comment by Harry — August 27, 2007 @ 11:14 pm | Reply

  9. Thank you Sisyphus!

    Comment by ChenZhen — August 27, 2007 @ 11:54 pm | Reply

  10. Is that La Mona’s band?

    Comment by Ann O'Maly — August 28, 2007 @ 7:50 am | Reply

  11. This one time, at band camp…

    Comment by Fascinated and Confused — August 28, 2007 @ 7:51 am | Reply

  12. i think thats what freedom of speech comes under ..
    people can express them selves in any way form or video, parents have to careful not let there kids watch these kinds of videos its all about parenting

    Comment by maliha11 — August 28, 2007 @ 8:35 am | Reply

  13. “if they wanted secrecy, they wouldn’t have made a video in the first place!”

    Their pride has been their own undoing. Let it always be thus with the wicked!

    Comment by Sisyphus — August 28, 2007 @ 8:53 am | Reply

  14. Ann: No, not mine. You people fail to note that a music “style” is in and of itself, ammoral. The content of the music is what makes it appropriate or not. Also, the saxophone is not evil. I thought that we already established this in the last instruments thread….guess not. One piece that someone made with ill intent does not make the whole genre bad. That’s stereotyping. It’s judging the group by the actions of one or a few. Many are not accurately protrayed by the minority.

    Comment by La Mona Returns! — August 28, 2007 @ 12:06 pm | Reply

  15. La Moana,

    Are you seriously trying to argue that dressing up in a tight band uniform and wagging your backside while playing a saxophone is somehow not salacious? No, this video unmasks marching bands and woodwinds for what they are; public form of pornography disguised as some innocent school activity. Marching bands are just a way for teenagers to display themselves in front of their peers so they attract next sexual partner for the non-spot orgy that go on in today’s public schools. This is preciously the kind of thing that happens when Jesus is taken out of the classroom.

    Comment by BJ Tabor — August 28, 2007 @ 1:27 pm | Reply

  16. @Hot, sloppy BJ:

    Have you ever seen what a real marching band uniform looks like? This is a music video, of course the sexuality is hugely magnified.

    How in touch with reality are you?

    Comment by donkspeedonkdonk — August 28, 2007 @ 1:46 pm | Reply

  17. “Marching bands are just a way for teenagers to display themselves in front of their peers so they attract next sexual partner for the non-spot orgy that go on in today’s public schools. This is preciously the kind of thing that happens when Jesus is taken out of the classroom.”

    You’ve hit the nail on the head there, BJ.

    “Have you ever seen what a real marching band uniform looks like? This is a music video, of course the sexuality is hugely magnified.”

    This is pretty much an expose of the typical band camp, if you ask me. American Pie corroborates the evidence.

    Comment by Sisyphus — August 28, 2007 @ 2:28 pm | Reply

  18. You’ve SEEN American Pie?! Oh my God! You must be the most “unChristian” Baptist on the planet!

    Comment by donkspeedonkdonk — August 28, 2007 @ 2:39 pm | Reply

  19. “You’ve SEEN American Pie?! Oh my God! You must be the most “unChristian” Baptist on the planet!”

    I’m not a Baptist, I’m a Catholic. I’m also a fairly recent convert. I was a Democrat until 9/11 and its aftermath.

    Comment by Sisyphus — August 28, 2007 @ 2:40 pm | Reply

  20. My apologies.

    You’ve SEEN American Pie?! Oh my God! You must be the most “unChristian” Catholic on the planet!

    Comment by donkspeedonkdonk — August 28, 2007 @ 2:51 pm | Reply

  21. “You’ve SEEN American Pie?! Oh my God! You must be the most “unChristian” Catholic on the planet!”

    It also came out in 1999, when I was still a Democrat. Have you ever learned to read, or do they only teach you to skim every other word up in Ottawa?

    Comment by Sisyphus — August 28, 2007 @ 3:17 pm | Reply

  22. I live in Calgary, and that was sarcasm. You win 50 internets for picking up on this fact.

    Comment by donkspeedonkdonk — August 28, 2007 @ 3:30 pm | Reply

  23. “I live in Calgary, and that was sarcasm. You win 50 internets for picking up on this fact.”

    Thanks, I guess!

    Where’s Calgary, Alberta? You guys should be joining us, not bashing us and sheltering our foes. Alberta and the Maritime Provinces belong in America, Quebec and Vermont belong in some Frenchified cesspool, and the rest of Canada can go their merry way.

    Comment by Sisyphus — August 28, 2007 @ 3:38 pm | Reply

  24. So, Sisyphus, please tell me just how you stumbled across this video without actually hunting it down?
    Hunting it down means you were actively looking for something like it. Meaning you wanted to find it.

    Comment by Curiouser and Curiouser — August 28, 2007 @ 4:40 pm | Reply

  25. One: American Pie is a sick, pointless, and invalid illistration of “band.” It’s sad that you find something from Hollywood so informative…when you otherwise toss it down. Oh yea, I forgot, this time it’s ocnvenient.

    Two: There is no way that a heavy wool uniform provokes sexual misconduct. Just in case you didn’t know what a typical band uniform looks like (and from previous comments–you don’t) it’s bibbers (basically…overalls) with a JACKET that shows NOTHING. Long sleeved and high collared. Then gloves, hat, and for the feet, some plain black or white shoes that are designed for marching. In no way are those considered sexy.

    Three: Public school is not one big orgy. In fact, people go there for something all together different….SCHOOL! (I know, shocker, isn’t it?) While there you sit in a classroom and study Math, Science, History, English, Spanish, Art, Music, etc, etc. Sorry, nothing on sexual misconduct. *shrugs*

    Four: Band camp is nothing of what you see in American Pie (which is still the most worthless piece of “evidence” you can find out there…). While there we do yet another shocker of a deal…we march. There’s nothing sexual about marching. (The military does it….Now, if you want to say that the military is prancing around looking for their next sexual partner….)

    Lastly, for BJ, you can’t read can you? I said that a STYLE is ammoral. (that means that it’s neither good nor bad.) It’s the CONTENT tha makes it bad. Music videos are usually bad….Music videos are NOT a valid representation of the typical marching band. Understand? “Many are not accurately protrayed by the minority.” Think real hard about what that means. You can do it. But, I’ll tell you anyways. You cannot take ONE person and take the ENTIRE GROUP to be rotten.

    And BJ, my name is La Mona. Spell it with me, L-A M-O-N-A. Six little letters, two tiny words, in another big language. Don’t resort to elementary school tactics. It doesn’t look good.

    Comment by La Mona — August 28, 2007 @ 5:30 pm | Reply

  26. La Mona,
    You keep saying things are already established – only in your mind. It’s amoral, not ammoral.

    Comment by Helen Bock — August 28, 2007 @ 6:12 pm | Reply

  27. Helen, there was another thread in which musical instruments were discussed. …hence established.

    And I’m dyslexic, thanks for showing me though. “amoral” I’ll remember now that I’ve seen it.

    Now, is that all you can do to discredit what I’ve said? Point out a little spelling mistake?

    Comment by La Mona — August 28, 2007 @ 7:00 pm | Reply

  28. sisyphus, Canada goes:
    BC (So Left it makes Holland look fascist), Alberta (Similar political climate to Texas. Oil, neoconservatives and neoliberals), Saskatchewan (Really weird, always votes socialist NDP provincially and Conservative federally), Manitoba (Capital is Winnipeg, which should be a sister city to Camden, New Jersey if it’s not already. Meaning it’s ugly. Unlike New Jersey, Manitoba has nearly no political clout. They often vote NDP and Conservative federally), Ontario (Main political centre, largely centrist, which is far-Left in comparison to your centrists, the Democrats), Quebec (Qui seulement voulant d’seperatir avec la Canada. They’re also almost as left as BC) and the Maritimes (Weeeeeeird.).

    So, really, the only province you’d want is Alberta. And even here the political climate is changing to be further left. The provincial Conservatives are going to lose hardcore next election. Everyone’s sick of being in a foreign-managed mini-USA with absolutely no tolerance for anyone other than the ultra-rich.

    As to why we’re currently Conservative, it’s largely Alberta (Huge population increase right now due to oil boom) and a bunch of people in Quebec who are irritated with the Liberals who have caused our government to go Conservative.

    There’ll be an election next year. Everyone sees Stephen Harper as Bush Jr. Jr. and are really loathing him because of it. We don’t want to be in Afghanistan, for the most part. Quebec voters are annoyed in particular, and the Conservatives are relying on the Bloc Quebecois (Separatist party which gets all of its votes in Quebec) to maintain power. It won’t last.

    Rumour is it that the Green Party might get some seats this year. Imagine that! Anyway, sorry for the mini-lecture of Canadian politics, but now you know!

    -YTICATMFND, Donkspeedonkdonk.

    Comment by donkspeedonkdonk — August 28, 2007 @ 11:53 pm | Reply

  29. Hello, Again I have a question. Do you think latex is bad thing? Probably not yet it is a common tool for sexual misconduct and such so why are you not shooting down latex companies???

    Oh yeah I remember your fools!
    By the way the whole thing about letting American Pie represent the whole marching band agenda. I guess that means you let Mel Gibson represent the whole Christian agenda.

    You people are a poor excuse for Christians (judging by what it is you say)

    Comment by Harry Potter — August 30, 2007 @ 7:39 am | Reply

  30. You’re* ::apologies::

    Comment by Harry Potter — August 30, 2007 @ 7:41 am | Reply

  31. “So, Sisyphus, please tell me just how you stumbled across this video without actually hunting it down?”

    BJ Tabor sent it to me.

    If La Mona hates something, that means we must be on to something with it.

    I already said we only want Alberta and the Maritimes, Donk. Maybe the Yukon, too.

    “You’re* ::apologies::”

    No need. I couldn’t understand what you said in the first place.

    Comment by Sisyphus — August 30, 2007 @ 12:27 pm | Reply

  32. Sisyphus is as straight Senator Craig. His sexuality is quesionable and so are his ethics.

    Comment by Harry Potter — August 31, 2007 @ 12:58 pm | Reply

  33. “If La Mona hates something, that means we must be on to something with it.”

    What are you on to exactly? And how did I play part in it? Pray tell. (wouldn’t want to misread or anything…)

    Comment by La Mona — August 31, 2007 @ 3:21 pm | Reply

  34. People who hate saxophones must be homosexuals.

    Vote white. Vote Ron Paul.

    Comment by spacebrother — August 31, 2007 @ 11:24 pm | Reply

  35. Hilary Clinton would agree with everything Sissyfoot is saying!

    Comment by Harry Potter — September 2, 2007 @ 4:36 pm | Reply

  36. People who hate saxophones must be homosexuals.

    ***Vote white.*** Vote Ron Paul.

    Comment by spacebrother — August 31, 2007 @ 11:24 pm

    ***Embellishment not typed by me***

    “Hilary Clinton would agree with everything Sissyfoot is saying!”

    Comment by Harry Potter — September 2, 2007 @ 4:36 pm

    More like Hitler and Stalin would agree with everything Sissyfoot is saying. Only dictators and fascists would embellish other peoples opinions.

    Comment by Spacebrother — September 4, 2007 @ 8:59 am | Reply

  37. “More like Hitler and Stalin would agree with everything Sissyfoot is saying. Only dictators and fascists would embellish other peoples opinions.”

    Only Democrats and RINOs would lie about them. Ron Paul is the White Power candidate.

    Comment by Sisyphus — September 4, 2007 @ 11:44 am | Reply

  38. “More like Hitler and Stalin would agree with everything Sissyfoot is saying. Only dictators and fascists would embellish other peoples opinions.”

    Only Democrats and RINOs would lie about them. Ron Paul is the White Power candidate.

    Comment by Sisyphus — September 4, 2007 @ 11:44 am

    Based on what evidence? On what some blog altering blogger posted and claims? Why would a so-called “white power” candidate take an anti-war stance. Are you on crack? I would venture to guess Brownback has more support from hate groups than any other candidate since David Duke.

    Comment by Spacebrother — September 4, 2007 @ 11:57 am | Reply

  39. “Why would a so-called “white power” candidate take an anti-war stance. Are you on crack?”

    Because most of the troops dying over there are white, and he’d want them here for the racial genocide.

    No, I’m not on crack, but that’s a very racially discriminatory question for you to ask. Just because I’m from New Jersey, you assume I’m a crackhead from the ghetto. You ought to be ashamed of yourself, mister.

    Comment by Sisyphus — September 4, 2007 @ 12:13 pm | Reply

  40. “Why would a so-called “white power” candidate take an anti-war stance. Are you on crack?”

    Because most of the troops dying over there are white, and he’d want them here for the racial genocide.

    No, I’m not on crack, but that’s a very racially discriminatory question for you to ask. Just because I’m from New Jersey, you assume I’m a crackhead from the ghetto. You ought to be ashamed of yourself, mister.

    Comment by Sisyphus — September 4, 2007 @ 12:13 pm

    OK, so you’re a Meth addict instead or perhaps a heroin junky. Maybe even a pothead.

    Comment by Spacebrother — September 4, 2007 @ 12:45 pm | Reply

  41. Your logic and penchant for altering posts leads me to believe you are on drugs.

    Comment by Spacebrother — September 4, 2007 @ 12:47 pm | Reply

  42. OK, so you’re a Meth addict instead or perhaps a heroin junky. Maybe even a pothead.”

    You’re a Satanist, a pimp, and a drug dealer. A racist, too. In other words, a typical Ron Paul supporter.

    “Your logic and penchant for altering posts leads me to believe you are on drugs.”

    I don’t think I live anywhere near you, so how could I be drinking from the water supply you’ve spiked with your illegal substances?

    Comment by Sisyphus — September 4, 2007 @ 1:04 pm | Reply

  43. David Duke endorsed Ron Paul, idiot.

    Comment by Psycheout — September 4, 2007 @ 1:19 pm | Reply

  44. Actually David Duke endorsed Brownback idiot.

    Comment by spacebrother — September 4, 2007 @ 2:46 pm | Reply

  45. David Duke Endorses Ron Paul.

    Comment by Psycheout — September 4, 2007 @ 3:46 pm | Reply

  46. “Sin thrives on secrecy, Geremy. The best way to counter it is to confront it openly”

    Bullpoop, it gave you a stiff hot dog !

    Comment by Brownback — September 7, 2007 @ 6:46 pm | Reply

  47. All woodwind instruments are evil? Wow, guess I should denounce my church choir for allowing flute and clarinet accompaniment to our hymns.

    It’s the dance that’s immoral, not the music. I’m sure if someone were sufficiently depraved, they could perform an erotic dance to “Three Blind Mice” or “How Great Thou Art.”

    Comment by Confused — October 20, 2007 @ 3:04 pm | Reply

  48. What’s your problem with asses? You have one. It’s important for sitting on. How can an ass be “sinful?” Same for tongues. Heck of a muscle. Watch yourself eating something in the mirror with your mouth open. The tongue really does a job. Plus, they feel nice. Are you implying you don’t like your wife’s (or husbands, or lover’s) tongue? To be that far from life, that may be truly sinful. Have you really studied the life of the Nazarene? Apparently he and his crew (men and women) were in the habit of giving each other “soul kisses.” See “How Christianity Became A Sex-negative Religion.” Very telling book, by an Episcopalian theologian/pastor, forget his name, loaned the book out. Good luck to you and your problems with your body.

    Comment by cobe scheldt — February 29, 2008 @ 7:18 pm | Reply

  49. Saxes??
    see many and hear only one Alto eB Sax.
    see a lot of Bb Trumpets…see a lot of Cymbals…and Snare Drums…
    hear percussion, Keys and a Bass

    Comment by Aeryn — April 30, 2008 @ 5:30 am | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: