Blogs 4 Brownback

August 9, 2007

B4B Hacked!

Filed under: Hackers,Open Thread — Psycheout @ 8:18 pm

HackerIt appears that B4B has been hacked by atheistic Demoncrat Islamofascists. The last post’s categories have disappeared and when I tried to create this one no categories were available.

Filed under: , — Psycheout @ 12:57 pm

Note to the hackers: you cannot silence the truth.

Update: The B4B Hacker Task Force has corrected the problem and it would appear that the problems were caused by a terrorist/hacker group going by the name “The Order of the Monkey” possibly led by one “La Mona” along with accomplice “La Puto.”

Dead HackerThe B4B Hacker Task Force’s motto is: “the only good hacker is a dead hacker.” B4B suggests that La Mona refrain from hacking our site in the future. You have been reported.

In the comment thread, B4B readers are free to state their case for whether these shapeshifing wiccan hackers should be banned.

Update 2: According to Interpol, Kashin-Sho (The Order of the Monkey), is an infamous hacker group with Japanese and American members.  If this is the same group, B4B was very lucky to have survived.

— Psycheout

39 Comments »

  1. You have the full support of Baptists for Brownback. If there is anything at all we can do just ask.

    Comment by Mrs. T.D. Gaines-Crockett — August 9, 2007 @ 8:41 pm | Reply

  2. Thank you. It appears you were right all along.

    Comment by Psycheout — August 9, 2007 @ 8:51 pm | Reply

  3. I dont think it was hacking, but more or less logging in without permission of the owner. But, the idea that anyone would log in to this place is mind-boggling

    Comment by Harry Potter — August 9, 2007 @ 8:58 pm | Reply

  4. YOURE MORONS I WOULD NEVER ATTEMPT TO “HACK” THIS CRAP SHOOT. THAT IS EMBARRASSING AND QUITE FRANKLY ILLEGAL THAT IS DEFIMATION OF CHARACTER AND I AM REQUESTING IT BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY.

    Comment by Harry Potter — August 9, 2007 @ 9:02 pm | Reply

  5. yes create a hoax an ban me i could care more this is an insult to Christianity and by the way crock pot shouldn’t you be tending to your husband what a narcissistic wife you are

    Comment by Harry Potter — August 9, 2007 @ 9:04 pm | Reply

  6. Request away, Hairy Plotter. “The Order of the Monkey” is going down.

    Comment by Psycheout — August 9, 2007 @ 9:05 pm | Reply

  7. I don’t know what “hoax” you’re blathering about, but that’s one vote for banning, I suppose. Thanks, Henry Potter.

    Comment by Psycheout — August 9, 2007 @ 9:05 pm | Reply

  8. Your welcome PSHYCO

    [Ed Note: Why do you keep changing IP addresses? That’s a sure sign that you’re one of the Monkey h4xx0rz, according to experts. And slurring your speech online is a sign of alcohol abuse, some say.]

    Comment by Harry Potter — August 9, 2007 @ 9:11 pm | Reply

  9. A preliminary investigation shows that “Harry Potter” has commented under multiple identities and under multiple IP addresses. Aliases include: La Pato, El Pato, La Puto, Harry Potter and Jacob Intense. Suspicious behavior, to say the least.

    Comment by Psycheout — August 9, 2007 @ 9:24 pm | Reply

  10. thank you for your waste of time everytime i changed my name. it was obvious that it was i posting them and i still want those statements removed. god bless.

    Comment by Harry Potter [formerly "the Duck"] — August 9, 2007 @ 10:02 pm | Reply

  11. If your group “The Order of the Monkey” releases a statement praising the good works of B4B, we might consider your request.

    Comment by Psycheout — August 9, 2007 @ 10:11 pm | Reply

  12. First addressing multiple IPs. Let’s try, these people (all different, mind you) post at school, at home, at the church office (myself and Laz), have posted from a friends house. There’s not just one computer that I sit at all day. I have access to multiple computers, not just this one, and any of the people that post here that also go to school with me are the same.

    Also, past the basic use of computers I am computer ignorant. How in all the snots can a “hacker” be computer ignorant.

    Also, Baptistsforbrown accused me of being some old guy that posed as a teen under the name “la mona” on a teen Christian forum. Then, it was found that the IP I was using at the time came from SCHOOL! Gee, that bit is now null and void. Sorry to bust that bubble. Also, as far as being reported, my principal came in and read some of this and laughed at you ignorant fools and your baseless accusations.

    It was La Pato, then I pointed out to him that it needed to be “El Pato” to be grammatically correct, then he just decided that Harry Potter was better, but never hid (and announced) that he was changing names. Also, there is more than one class period in a day and more than one person uses a computer in a given day…therefore same IP. It’s a school. There’s lots of people there (bit of a shocker, isn’t it?).

    I have never heard of this “Order of the Monkey.” So, where’s your proof?

    So, in sum.
    There is no proof that I’m a hacker.
    The “la mona” old man from a Christian forum can’t be me considering I post on here from SCHOOL. (thus making it, again, null and void)
    Explanation has been given to multiple IPs, and Harry changing his name (which was announced to keep from confusion.)
    I never did anything except state the truth with supportive fact (Bible included.)
    I am Christian
    I am not a Democrat.
    Islamofacist is a contradiction of terms.
    I’m not a shapeshifter. I’m sorry that you too do not know the difference between “bend” and “shift” in the English language, and again, it’s not like you can prove it.
    If I’m a Christian, I can’t be a witch.
    While the “Order of the Monkey” may exist (having to take your word for it) I have no clue as to who they are, and thus not associated with them. You have no proof. Again, baseless. I have proof that states otherwise. (That IP address that shows me posting at SCHOOL just kills you. Lack of evidence on your part to associate me. Don’t forget your assumptions. Please, try something that would hold up in court….a real court outside your twisted domain.)

    Comment by La Mona — August 9, 2007 @ 10:20 pm | Reply

  13. A new federal law states that when you annoy someone on the Internet, you must disclose your identity. Here’s the relevant language.

    “Whoever…utilizes any device or software that can be used to originate telecommunications or other types of communications that are transmitted, in whole or in part, by the Internet… without disclosing his identity and with intent to annoy, abuse, threaten, or harass any person…who receives the communications…shall be fined under title 18 or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.”

    Comment by Mrs. T.D. Gaines-Crockett — August 10, 2007 @ 5:36 am | Reply

  14. I have never lied as to who I am. And I’m not following the definition of “annoying.” On an open blog where all are free to comment I have done such. Just because you don’t agree with me and I constantly prove you wrong does not make me “annoying”–at least by the laws definition. I’m sure that it’s annoying not being able to peg any of your blind accusations on me (it’s especially hard to make something false look true.)

    Comment by La Mona — August 10, 2007 @ 6:28 am | Reply

  15. Oh my! Satan has many agents in Alabama. If they won’t repent they must be banned.

    Comment by Ann O'Maly — August 10, 2007 @ 7:22 am | Reply

  16. Dear Mrs. O’Maly,

    Sadly for them, the agents of Satan in Alabama are not nearly as smart as they think they are. God has His ways of dealing with trash and so do the internet servers. Some people just have no self-control or respect.

    God Bless you and your family, dear. You are in our prayers.

    Comment by Mrs. T.D. Gaines-Crockett — August 10, 2007 @ 8:02 am | Reply

  17. …You guys are all stupid (La mona and Harry Potter excluded).

    Comment by Brandon Explosion — August 10, 2007 @ 8:03 am | Reply

  18. Psycheout, can you prove any of this?

    Comment by Adam Nelson — August 10, 2007 @ 8:40 am | Reply

  19. It serves you right to get hacked. This is the most hatefull blog I have ever seen.

    Comment by Lisa — August 10, 2007 @ 10:21 am | Reply

  20. Hateful?? Friend we love everyone, even the disgusting, smell, kitten murdering liberals.

    Comment by BJ Tabor — August 10, 2007 @ 10:42 am | Reply

  21. You say you love everyone, but in the some breath call liberals disgusting, smelly kitten-murderers. Well, here’s some news for you, pal—I don’t kill kittens. They’re adorable. And I’m a liberal.

    Comment by AutoFire — August 10, 2007 @ 11:05 am | Reply

  22. same*

    Comment by AutoFire — August 10, 2007 @ 11:12 am | Reply

  23. I’m glad you’re taking action against this malignant blight.

    Comment by Helen Bock — August 10, 2007 @ 11:21 am | Reply

  24. Here’s a new idea: PROVE IT!

    Comment by Adam Nelson — August 10, 2007 @ 11:34 am | Reply

  25. The only good hacker is a dead hacker?
    So you just take the site’s motto about queers, moonbats, Islamofacists, commies, scientists and atheists and added the word “hacker?”

    Comment by Fascinated and Confused — August 10, 2007 @ 12:53 pm | Reply

  26. You say you love everyone, but in the some breath call liberals disgusting, smelly kitten-murderers. Well, here’s some news for you, pal—I don’t kill kittens. They’re adorable. And I’m a liberal.

    Oh, so the little kittens are “only asleep with the Great Goddess”, is that what you tell yourself? Keep away from my cat you horrible sinner! Repent before our loving Savior Jesus Christ returns and cuts out your liver and feeds to the birds.

    Comment by BJ Tabor — August 10, 2007 @ 2:56 pm | Reply

  27. Dear Brother BJ,

    I would not trust that Autotire person within ten feet of a small animal much less an innocent child for a second. People that vicious probably incorporate cannibalism into their satanic rituals and would kill a dozen bystanders just to get one taste of innocent flesh. I do not trust that one as far as I could pick him and throw him.

    Praying for the day that vile demons such as Autofire are selectively removed from the streets and locked safely away in prison.

    Comment by Mrs. T.D. Gaines-Crockett — August 10, 2007 @ 3:12 pm | Reply

  28. Praying for the day that vile demons such as Autofire are selectively removed from the streets and locked safely away in prison.

    Godly words Mrs Gaines Crockett! I too will pray for the day when Jesus gives Autofire one of His tough love time outs. Maybe when Autofire is bent over his cell bunk by a 300lb blackman Autofire will begin to understand why atheism is so evil.

    Comment by BJ Tabor — August 10, 2007 @ 3:51 pm | Reply

  29. “Maybe when Autofire is bent over his cell bunk by a 300lb blackman Autofire will begin to understand why atheism is so evil.”

    Above statement made by BJ Tabor. Proof that he loves no one but himself.

    Comment by Lazarus — August 10, 2007 @ 5:07 pm | Reply

  30. The correct term is cracker, BTW, not hacker.

    Comment by Linus — August 10, 2007 @ 9:18 pm | Reply

  31. Above statement made by BJ Tabor. Proof that he loves no one but himself.

    Are you accusing me of self-pollution friend? I would never do such a thing an murder the souls of the unborn in my seed just for my own pleasure.

    Comment by BJ Tabor — August 10, 2007 @ 9:21 pm | Reply

  32. The only good hacker is a dead hacker?
    So you just take the site’s motto about queers, moonbats, Islamofacists, commies, scientists and atheists and added the word “hacker?”

    Comment by Fascinated and Confused — August 10, 2007 @ 12:53 pm

    More terrorist speak.

    Comment by spacebrother — August 11, 2007 @ 4:30 am | Reply

  33. Lol, I see that in my absence nothing has been proven. Good job guys, good job. You people are sad. (those that aren’t know who they are….)

    Vacation was great, btw.

    Comment by La Mona — August 12, 2007 @ 4:09 pm | Reply

  34. Proof is for alcohol, young lady. Just ask Jack.

    Comment by Psycheout — August 12, 2007 @ 4:25 pm | Reply

  35. Proof would make you believable. Expand your mind past your narrow purposes and move back to the main definition of “proof” which would be something to the effect of showing the people here that the accusations you pose hold water (i.e. have a chance at being true–a GOOD chance at being true.) Right now, they stand baseless and without a foundation. Good job.

    Comment by La Mona — August 12, 2007 @ 5:27 pm | Reply

  36. Good job.

    Thanks!

    Comment by Psycheout — August 12, 2007 @ 5:35 pm | Reply

  37. That was sarcasm…that would be obvious if you could understand simple English and comprehend the rest of my message.

    Comment by La Mona — August 12, 2007 @ 5:58 pm | Reply

  38. if you could understand simple English and comprehend the rest of my message.

    I can. Thanks!

    Comment by Psycheout — August 12, 2007 @ 6:38 pm | Reply

  39. Then do it. Prove some of the things I have been accused of, because at the moment I’m still an innocent person. “Innocent until proven guilty….” Considering they’re false accusations you pulled out of thin air to attck me with because you can’t debate with me I doubt you can make a case that proves any of them….but good luck anyways. I’ll wait.

    Comment by La Mona — August 12, 2007 @ 7:27 pm | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: