Blogs 4 Brownback

August 6, 2007

The Military Emasculates Itself

Gay SoldiersLetting homosexuals in the military has finally borne fruit for the America-hating left:

The Army and Air Force are considering disciplinary action against seven officers — including four generals — who violated ethics rules by assisting a Christian group in the production of a fundraising video.

The Pentagon inspector general found the officers were interviewed in uniform and “in official and often identifiable Pentagon locations,” according to a 45-page report.

They made comments that “conferred approval of and support” to the evangelical group, Christian Embassy, “and the remarks of some officers implied they spoke for a group of senior military leaders rather than just for themselves,” the report stated.

Decent, patriotic Americans defending this country are now being crucified by the devious, underhanded, America-hating treefrogs who have come to replace them in the higher echelons of the Armed Forces. These traitors operate from a consistently pro-Sodomite agenda, yet they want to stifle the opinions raised by those who defy them on political matters.

All of this is Clinton’s fault. If he hadn’t allowed homosexuals to enter our military, they couldn’t currently be undercutting its combat readiness and its ability to boost morale and see to the spiritual well-being of our men in uniform. Not only is stomping out sodomy in the military a vital national security measure, we should also bear in mind that the only way many of these brave patriots will save their souls before losing their bodies in combat, is if the military tells them about the wondrous miracle of Christianity.

I weep for America, and for the future of our ongoing experiment in Christian democracy. Fie on you, Satan!

54 Comments »

  1. Sisyphus, with your narrow view of Christianity, “Christian democracy” is an oxymoron.

    Comment by AutoFire — August 6, 2007 @ 9:51 pm | Reply

  2. If he hadn’t allowed homosexuals to enter our military

    Because we all know that they are so easily identified.

    Comment by Jack — August 7, 2007 @ 1:05 am | Reply

  3. Another great expose. Good work, Sisyphus. You are opening eyes across America.

    Comment by Psycheout — August 7, 2007 @ 2:46 am | Reply

  4. Autofire,

    Brother Sisyphus most certainly does not have a narrow view of Christianity; he has the ONLY view, the one prescribed by the Lord via Biblical scripture. Why is that so hard for you to understand? If it is in the Bible then it is true. If it is inspired by the Lord to someone of superior Biblical understanding and higher moral regard then it is true.

    Through much prayer and discernment, I know that Sisyphus and Psycheout are righteous men. It offends me as a fellow Christian and Biblical Authoritarian to see either of these vessels of God admonished by someone such as you, who, by simply by reading your comments, makes it painfully clear that you have about as much ability to discern Biblical truth as you do to walk and chew gum at the same time.

    Bravo, Sisyphus, on another brilliant and inspired post. You are a beacon of the Lord’s shining light in the darkness of the world.

    Comment by Mrs. T.D. Gaines-Crockett — August 7, 2007 @ 5:51 am | Reply

  5. “Because we all know that they are so easily identified”

    They certainly are. They’re the ones fornicating with members of the same sex.

    Comment by Sisyphus — August 7, 2007 @ 5:52 am | Reply

  6. Doesn’t the military need florists and hairdressers?

    Comment by Ann O'Maly — August 7, 2007 @ 6:21 am | Reply

  7. Dear Ann,

    I feel confident that there are plenty of perfectly competent florists and barbers available through Exodus programs nationwide that are more than willing to donate their services. The difference being is that their more deviant “talents” would not be a worry to the troops.

    Comment by Mrs. T.D. Gaines-Crockett — August 7, 2007 @ 6:26 am | Reply

  8. “If it is in the Bible then it is true. If it is inspired by the Lord to someone of superior Biblical understanding and higher moral regard then it is true.”

    Thank you, Mrs. Gaines-Crockett. This says it all. This sums it up right here. This is all you really need to know. This, and the study of the Bible.

    “Bravo, Sisyphus, on another brilliant and inspired post. You are a beacon of the Lord’s shining light in the darkness of the world.”

    Thank you!

    Comment by Sisyphus — August 7, 2007 @ 9:37 am | Reply

  9. What have these generals that have done that is so wrong? All they said as Christian it is their policy to attack unbelievers until they surrender and accept Jesus and democracy. Is that wrong? That’s why we are there in Iraq, to make it a Christian democracy.

    Comment by BJ Tabor — August 7, 2007 @ 10:33 am | Reply

  10. Since when was America a Christian democracy?

    (you have yet to prove that the “United States of God” and the United States of America are the same thing.)

    Comment by La Mona — August 7, 2007 @ 10:36 am | Reply

  11. La Mona,
    Since 1776 – don’t they teach history in school anymore?

    Comment by Helen Bock — August 7, 2007 @ 10:58 am | Reply

  12. Sisyphus, I believe you’re wrong on this one.

    The American military should predominantly consist of the pagans, atheists, homosexuals, Mexicans and other pseudo-Americans. Why risk letting our good Christian brothers be injured in combat when we have it upon these heathens instead?

    Comment by Fascinated and Confused — August 7, 2007 @ 11:29 am | Reply

  13. Yea, ummm, let’s address the part of my comment that says “prove [it].”

    The founding fathers designed this country so that no one religion is above another in the political system. That way religious extremists couldn’t overrun government and send us right back to where we started…fleeing religous persecution. No, this country has this nifty little thing called the Bill of Rights and that would be Freedom of Religion. ALL religions have freedom here. Christianity is not the only religion in case you were wondering.

    Didn’t they teach you that in school? It’s basic History. Not hard.

    Comment by La Mona — August 7, 2007 @ 11:30 am | Reply

  14. “La Mona,
    Since 1776 – don’t they teach history in school anymore?”

    Apparently not, because you seem awfully mixed up Hellen. La Mona is right.

    Comment by Brandon Explosion — August 7, 2007 @ 11:39 am | Reply

  15. What’s wrong with being of Mexican decent? What, because you’re of European decent you’re special? Oh my gosh, my ancestors were born in a geographical location north of you! Therefore, I must be better! (Note the sarcasm.)

    Atheists are human too. Just because you don’t agree with them doesn’t give your life more value than theirs. (God loves all.)

    Pagans–See the “atheist” comment.

    Homosexuals–gee, see it again.

    So basically, you’re racist, intolerant, and going against Christian beliefs by thinking God would value you more than the next person. (Again, God loves all.)

    Comment by La Mona — August 7, 2007 @ 11:43 am | Reply

  16. Hey Brandon!

    Ironically, I’m in school right now, and the teacher is laughing at them.

    Comment by La Mona — August 7, 2007 @ 11:45 am | Reply

  17. La Mona,

    You claim you are a Christian and you are condoning homosexuality, atheism and paganism??? What ever do you consider a sin?? I’ll (grudgingly) concerned there is an argument for not killing them out right but as Christians we must show these people how wrong they are.

    Comment by BJ Tabor — August 7, 2007 @ 12:07 pm | Reply

  18. This is of course quite comical. These arguments are based upon ignorance and inability to comprehend reason.

    Comment by La Pato — August 7, 2007 @ 12:18 pm | Reply

  19. “This is of course quite comical. These arguments are based upon ignorance and inability to comprehend reason.”

    I know. La Mona’s always like that. Pay no attention to her. She’s a sorceress who changes shapes when it suits her Dark Master’s foul whims.

    Comment by Sisyphus — August 7, 2007 @ 12:45 pm | Reply

  20. Ummm, I never condoned any of those things. I said that you cannot condone wanting to kill them. And God loves all. To say that He doesn’t love them as much as you is not Christian. Now, what part of that do you have trouble comprehending?

    And Sisyphus, he was refering to you people. La Pato is one of my friends who was sitting at the computer next to me. As far as the rest of your comment….you still have yet to prove it. At this point your argument has been shoved in the dirt and holds no value, but if you wish to reinforce your asinine statements, please do. It would help your case.

    Comment by La Mona — August 7, 2007 @ 12:58 pm | Reply

  21. Now, what part of that do you have trouble comprehending?

    How you can claim to be a Christian and yet be so cold hearted as to not to try and help your fellow man. An atheist is wrong La Mono, end of discussion. The only place an atheist is going is on to the end of Satan’s barbed, over sized member to suffer for eternity. Don’t you want to help save just one person from that?

    Comment by BJ Tabor — August 7, 2007 @ 1:44 pm | Reply

  22. Not by shooting them in the face, as you and Gaines-Crockett would undoubtledly do. The only reason you are the way you are is because you have it pounded into your skull that somehow you are ‘more special’ than everyone else simply because your mommy and daddy raised you a certain way and you were born in a large geographic region. You are very ignorant. I am curious, how old are you?

    La Mona and La Plato, keep stickin’ it to these jerks.

    Comment by Brandon Explosion — August 7, 2007 @ 2:06 pm | Reply

  23. Mona@15:
    “Atheists are human too. Just because you don’t agree with them doesn’t give your life more value than theirs. ”

    No they’re not. Yes it does.

    Case closed, next topic.

    Comment by Fascinated and Confused — August 7, 2007 @ 2:14 pm | Reply

  24. I believe La Plato is another of La Mona’s multiple personalities and Mona where do you get off calling Sisyphus asinine? He is brilliant.

    Comment by Helen Bock — August 7, 2007 @ 2:42 pm | Reply

  25. @Fascinated and Confused: So now we’re labeling atheists “subhuman”? Nice ad hominem, that. Also, you’re starting to sound like a genocidal maniac.

    @Helen Bock: Where do you get off calling an ignorant jerk like Sisyphus “brilliant”? He is ignorant of everything except his own narrow perspective and has suggested that all who disagree with him be imprisoned and/or killed. Doesn’t sound very brilliant to me.

    Comment by AutoFire — August 7, 2007 @ 4:20 pm | Reply

  26. Bock, you’re delusional. Nice of you to resort to that arguement when you don’t have anything else to say. Please, try this thing called “rebuttal.” It’s going to require you to back up your statements with logical rational thought (proof!). It’s going to be hard for you, but you can do it. (Good luck with that.)

    Atheist are humans as well. So are Muslims. So are Hindu. Your religious affiliation does not make you “human.” And no my fascinated and confused friend, by Christian standards/teachings you are not more valuable than an atheist. All people are God’s creation, and He loves all “unconditionally.” Next!

    Otherwise, Brandon said it well in comment #22. Loving does not mean cruel and unusual punishment. It’s America….that’s illegal. And unChristian on top of that. Christians are called to share their faith, not shove it down someone’s throat. (You don’t sound very Christian, now do you? Hmmm,…..)

    Comment by La Mona — August 7, 2007 @ 5:43 pm | Reply

  27. What countries don’t allow homosexuals in their military?

    * Brazil
    * China
    * Cuba
    * Egypt
    * Iran
    * North Korea
    * Philippines
    * Saudi Arabia
    * Syria
    * Venezuela
    * Yemen

    Yeah, we’re in good company.

    Comment by Salmo — August 7, 2007 @ 6:59 pm | Reply

  28. It’s America….that’s illegal.

    America is not illegal, La Mona. You’re going to have to back up your baseless assertions with facts if you want to be taken seriously.

    Comment by Psycheout — August 7, 2007 @ 7:53 pm | Reply

  29. Ok, Psycheout let’s try again. Look at a bigger chunk of my statement,

    “Loving does not mean cruel and unusual punishment. It’s America….that’s illegal.”

    Look at “cruel and unusual punishment.” In America [It’s America…as in the U.S.A.] cruel and unusual punishment is illegal. There, is that better? Can you read it now?

    Psycheout gets a point for stupid word twisting!

    Comment by La Mona — August 7, 2007 @ 8:03 pm | Reply

  30. “Where do you get off calling an ignorant jerk like Sisyphus “brilliant”? He is ignorant of everything except his own narrow perspective and has suggested that all who disagree with him be imprisoned and/or killed. Doesn’t sound very brilliant to me.”

    On Judgment Day, you’ll be seeing things a little bit differently.

    Comment by Sisyphus — August 8, 2007 @ 6:14 am | Reply

  31. Are physical laws such as gravity created or discovered? They of course are discovered this is also true for good and evil. Atheism is a form of disbelief it isn’t an attack on “God”, however it is a belief i do not support. As with many other, but that doesn’t make them less than human. If you know so much about the bible and the meaning behind it you would know that Christianity is an overwhelming accusation. It is confusing and impossible to completely understand it and that is a lot to believe so you cannot condemn them for their disbelief. It is mere inability to comprehend the impossible. Yet i feel Christianity is true other do not and if you do then you would know christian witnessing is supposed to be a subtle introduction to God, and not a forceful and hateful introduction. La Mona is not I, and I am not La Mona.

    Comment by El Pato — August 8, 2007 @ 7:39 am | Reply

  32. Yea, you will as well, Sisyphus.

    Comment by La Mona — August 8, 2007 @ 7:54 am | Reply

  33. If tommorrow was judgement day, you’d still look like a buffoon to me Sisyphus.

    Comment by Brandon Explosion — August 8, 2007 @ 8:24 am | Reply

  34. “Are physical laws such as gravity created or discovered?”

    Created by God.

    “La Mona is not I, and I am not La Mona.”

    Now we know you have a demon, shapeshifter.

    “If tommorrow was judgement day, you’d still look like a buffoon to me Sisyphus.”

    Not from your perch in Hell I wouldn’t.

    Comment by Sisyphus — August 8, 2007 @ 12:38 pm | Reply

  35. You can’t read can you? El Pato does not equal La Mona. How hard is that? You still lack any proof. ……(bad reading skills and word twisting don’t qualify as proof.)

    Comment by La Mona — August 8, 2007 @ 3:35 pm | Reply

  36. I believe I said it before, but I think Sisyphus is allergic to the concept of “proof”.

    Comment by AutoFire — August 8, 2007 @ 3:56 pm | Reply

  37. La Mona your dark magic can help you. I think you should choose charizard[not the sarcasm]. Since I another of La Mona’s personalities support similar views am i also a wizard if so i now am refured to as Harry Potter. LOL

    Comment by El Pato — August 8, 2007 @ 8:46 pm | Reply

  38. Just what does El Puto mean anyway?

    Comment by Psycheout — August 8, 2007 @ 8:53 pm | Reply

  39. Put it into babelfish, Psycho Psycheout.

    Comment by AutoFire — August 8, 2007 @ 9:50 pm | Reply

  40. El PlAto (note the “a” Psycheout) means the “duck” in Spanish. When I showed him your site and he said he wanted to comment he wanted a Spanish name as well.

    [sarcasm noted El Plato :)]

    Comment by Darn again — August 8, 2007 @ 9:52 pm | Reply

  41. There now my name’s fixed.🙂 Again….”Darn again” is me because of the Baptist joke….(^_^)

    Comment by La Mona — August 8, 2007 @ 9:54 pm | Reply

  42. Well I do believe El Puto means nothing.

    Comment by El Pato — August 8, 2007 @ 9:54 pm | Reply

  43. Cool, comments go away when you change a name and not an e-mail….hmmm, I’m experimenting with WordPress at the moment……..

    Oh, and El Plato (note the “a” Psycheout) is the “duck” in Spanish.

    El Plato, sarcasm is noted🙂

    Comment by La Mona — August 8, 2007 @ 9:56 pm | Reply

  44. Ah! Take out the “l.” You get the drift…I’m dyslexic…can’t believe I did that both times.

    Comment by La Mona — August 8, 2007 @ 9:57 pm | Reply

  45. Well I do believe El Puto means nothing.

    You are quite literally incorrect.

    Comment by Psycheout — August 8, 2007 @ 10:31 pm | Reply

  46. “El puto”, I think, is an extremely rude word in Spanish.

    Comment by AutoFire — August 8, 2007 @ 10:58 pm | Reply

  47. Well, I could frankly care a lot more, yet I do not. Plus, I have no use for terms that are extremely rude.

    Comment by Harry Potter [formerly "the Duck"] — August 9, 2007 @ 5:55 am | Reply

  48. It’s close Autofire, but “puto” isn’t a word in Spanish.🙂 Is that better for your Literalist mind Psycheout?

    Comment by La Mona Returns! — August 9, 2007 @ 7:38 am | Reply

  49. I think we’re derailing from the topic.

    …Actually, no, this is a good thing. That was a stupid topic anyway🙂

    Comment by Brandon Explosion — August 9, 2007 @ 2:31 pm | Reply

  50. Lol, in that case, what’s up next?

    Comment by La Mona — August 9, 2007 @ 9:41 pm | Reply

  51. Spanish is the language of demons and sorcerors and shapeshifters. Be very wary when you hear it, it means that witches are about.

    Comment by Sisyphus — August 9, 2007 @ 9:43 pm | Reply

  52. Oh noes, that means I’m a (gasp) WIZARD because I’m fluent in (gasp) SPANISH!!!!!

    Comment by AutoFire — August 9, 2007 @ 11:30 pm | Reply

  53. Sisyphus i have a note to you

    um where do you get your information? how is spanish in anyway make you a demon? yes they hold special classes to teach us demons spanish. we will corrupt you all with are siestas and enchiladas. you have found us out.

    Comment by icewho — August 11, 2007 @ 1:19 am | Reply

  54. Yea, I would LOVE to hear how Spanish is a demon language and American English is just sooooo pure. Go for it Sisyphus.

    AutoFire: Really? That’s cool. Are you a native speaker, or did you learn later? If later, how long did it take?

    Comment by La Mona — August 12, 2007 @ 8:04 pm | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: