Blogs 4 Brownback

August 6, 2007

Send Lindsay Lohan to Guantanamo!

Lindsay LohanI’ve had it up to here with that “woman” and her abject, brazen harlotry. Here is her latest outrage:

In an interview with ladies fashion magazine Elle, conducted before Lindsay Lohan was arrested on her first suspected DUI charge, the actress told the magazine she would never drive drunk.

Lohan made the statement in the revealing cover story, due to hit stands Aug. 14, after being asked about the paparazzi that follow her everywhere. She segued into the topic of drunk driving after first answering whether she could see her way to her car, through the dozens of flashbulbs going off as she left various locales.

Whining, simpering harlot. Women younger than her are getting their limbs blown off fighting for American freedom in Iraq, and she’s whining about an endless stream of toadies witnessing her orgies and depravities?

Guantanamo is too good for a creature like this. I think we should trade her to the Taliban for some of those South Korean hostages. They’d know how to teach a wayward strumpet like this her place.

“It’s scary. I can’t (see with all the light bulbs flashing). And they’re looking for me to, like, trip, so they can be like, ‘Oh, Lindsay’s wasted and driving drunk.’ And that’s not it. I wouldn’t violate … I’m much more responsible than that. I would not do that,” she told Elle. “You know what the worst thing is? They’re making money off it! It’s like, why don’t the celebrities make money (from the photos)? It’s not right, the fact that someone is making money off you enjoying your time.”

You know what? I agree with her. Photographers should be imprisoned for photographing this trullish harlotry. Lindsay Lohan should be imprisoned for public drunkenness, for obscenity, for failing to strap her chest down, for corrupting her nation’s moral fiber with overt and degenerate displays of Godless hedonism and prostitution, and for gross ingratitude that imprisonment is the worst punishment she faces. A civilized society would have flogged her in the public square by now. And then buried her up to her neck in an anthill. If Guantanamo is the worst our current legal system will allow us to impose on this Siren of Satanism, I will concede it- reluctantly. I still think her public execution would serve our nation better, but perhaps a few years in Guantanamo will do more for her spiritual well-being. Perhaps it will show her the error of her ways.

I think decent Americans agree with me, and by now even most moonbats wouldn’t mind sending this prostitute to Guantanamo with the other anti-American refuse. But a few will likely take issue with this solution. Those few are morons and anti-American refuse themselves. Their foolishness is demonstrable in many ways, but to begin with, they haven’t even begun to consider the benefits of sending Lohan to Gitmo. No photographers, which will silence her wicked, catlike tongue. More importantly, she could serve a valuable role in extracting information from the other inmates. Perhaps the tale of her redemption from flagrant harlotry into Christian virtue could even tempt them out of Islamism and into Christianity. On the other hand, should she fail to embrace the Lord in prison, the Islamists will serve a valuable role in controlling Miss Lohan. By forcing her to don a burqa, they will spare us all the sight of her for several years to come.

The plan is not without its drawbacks- Lohan will eventually leave Guantanamo, for example. Still, I think our nation deserves a long-term solution to a national moral epidemic. Sending Lindsay Lohan to Guantanamo provides us with such a solution.

Regardless of what is done with her, the first CNN reporter who puts her face on television during her trial should be cudgeled.

UPDATE: Imprison them both in somewhere worse than a country-club prison like Guantanamo. Doesn’t America still have gladiator prisons somewhere that we could use to house these sorts of deviants?

Update 2 (by Psycheout): Ok, pervs I’m really sick of this.

Search Views
lindsay lohan nude 151
Lindsay Lohan naked 97
Lindsey Lohan 64
nude lindsay lohan 63
prostitute pictures 31

Pervs, be gone!

88 Comments »

  1. Oh, very nice. Send anyone you deem ‘immoral’ to Guantanamo, and ‘cudgel’ reporters.

    Comment by interpreted — August 6, 2007 @ 7:34 am | Reply

  2. Thanks for the wanking material

    Comment by MMMM — August 6, 2007 @ 8:05 am | Reply

  3. it is funny that you would pick on one person for mistakes they have done .. and she is what a celebrity a defenition of a Star would be: make movies, take nice pictures, show up and look good, and party a lot. thats there life, leave them alone. rather than you wasting your time and strength writing about what Lindsey has done where she is a young person, and who cares if she was drinking every one in America drinks what’s the issues with that??! act a little more responsible towards your society and write about what your President is doing what kind of human rights rule and regulations is he violating, and what senators and politicians are doing wrong?
    and please at least have some respect for others religion, don’t make religion a sarcastic punch line🙂
    much regards
    Maliha

    Comment by maliha11 — August 6, 2007 @ 8:06 am | Reply

  4. “Oh, very nice. Send anyone you deem ‘immoral’ to Guantanamo, and ‘cudgel’ reporters.”

    Either that, or suffer your children to burgeon into harlotry. I don’t know about you, interpreted, but I’m unwilling to roll the dice with my childrens’ souls. Lindsay Lohan’s life isn’t as important to me.

    Comment by Sisyphus — August 6, 2007 @ 10:29 am | Reply

  5. “Regardless of what is done with her, the first CNN reporter who puts her face on television during her trial should be cudgeled.”

    What about the first Fox News reporter?

    Comment by Brandon Explosion — August 6, 2007 @ 11:06 am | Reply

  6. At least she’s cute, that Paris Hilton is a rich dog.

    Comment by dadaclu — August 6, 2007 @ 11:16 am | Reply

  7. Guantanamo is too good for that little strumpet. Shave her head and send her to a state ran facility post haste.

    Comment by Mrs. T.D. Gaines-Crockett — August 6, 2007 @ 11:23 am | Reply

  8. What’s next, this harlot polluting herself with a rolled up copy of the Constitution? Our Christian for fathers did not create this great country just so strumpets could debauch themselves in the street like America is one big Roman orgy. For the public morality Lindsay Lohan should be stripped naked and flogged threw the streets to show everyone what sexual deviancy looks like.

    Comment by BJ Tabor — August 6, 2007 @ 11:58 am | Reply

  9. The trashy media is worse for presenting her and the other young harlots on TV and in the magazines at the front of the supermarket.

    Comment by Helen Bock — August 6, 2007 @ 2:18 pm | Reply

  10. Hear, hear! In this era of global communication, these Hollyweird starlet-harlots are unofficial ambassadors to the rest of the world. And what a message they send! Failing to wear underpants (let alone modest ankle-length dresses) and exposing their disease-ridden womanly parts in public. Proudly displaying the tattoos and piercings that litter their scantly-clad bodies. Drinking, drugging and fornicating with hedonistic abandon. Spawning illegitimate children and then abandoning them so they can continue their sick, sinful lifestyles. Is it any wonder the terrorists hate us?

    Comment by Promisekeeper — August 6, 2007 @ 3:12 pm | Reply

  11. What about the first Fox News reporter?

    Who cares? They’re all part of the same Liberal media complex trying to push immorality on this nation. Fox is probably the worst in that regard with their pro-pornagraphic stance, so I say cudgel them all.

    Comment by Harry — August 6, 2007 @ 3:38 pm | Reply

  12. “At least she’s cute, that Paris Hilton is a rich dog.”

    When dealing with immodest succubi and harlots, beauty is a bad thing. It tempts more men into damnation.

    “What’s next, this harlot polluting herself with a rolled up copy of the Constitution?”

    No doubt these moonbats would applaud such a thing.

    Comment by Sisyphus — August 6, 2007 @ 4:19 pm | Reply

  13. “For the public morality Lindsay Lohan should be stripped naked and flogged threw the streets to show everyone what sexual deviancy looks like.”

    Amen! Flog the harlots!

    “Spawning illegitimate children and then abandoning them so they can continue their sick, sinful lifestyles. Is it any wonder the terrorists hate us?”

    Not at all. Terrorists despise us for the sins of the liberals, who aid and abet those very same terrorists. In a way, leftism is far worse than Islamism.

    Comment by Sisyphus — August 6, 2007 @ 4:28 pm | Reply

  14. Actually, we wouldn’t.

    Believe it or not, we “moonbats” love America just as much as any other citizen. Ms. Lohan needs to shut up and stay out of the public eye.

    Comment by AutoFire — August 6, 2007 @ 4:30 pm | Reply

  15. Comment 14 was a response to comment 12, not 13.

    Comment by AutoFire — August 6, 2007 @ 4:30 pm | Reply

  16. Sisyphus just turn your TV off if you don’t like what you see. No ones making you watch.

    Comment by Brandon Explosion — August 6, 2007 @ 5:21 pm | Reply

  17. “Sisyphus just turn your TV off if you don’t like what you see. No ones making you watch.”

    This is a computer, Brandon. I can’t go to a news website without being assaulted by these strumpets.

    Comment by Sisyphus — August 6, 2007 @ 6:58 pm | Reply

  18. Then ignore the news. You’re ignorant about everything else, so why not add the news to that list?

    Comment by AutoFire — August 6, 2007 @ 9:54 pm | Reply

  19. LOL Out of curiosity, I took some inventory with my ctrl+f feature. There are 10 usages of “harlot” in this thread. (“strumpet” only had 4)

    Comment by ChenZhen — August 6, 2007 @ 10:11 pm | Reply

  20. Send her over to my house. I’ll set her straight. You’ll see how well she turns out in an upcoming pictorial.

    Comment by Hugh Hefner — August 7, 2007 @ 6:25 am | Reply

  21. Those of you desiring to fornicate with Lindsay Lohan had best snuggle up to a raging inferno. The effect on your soul will be much the same, anyway. At least the brushfire might teach you repentance.

    Comment by Sisyphus — August 7, 2007 @ 9:46 am | Reply

  22. “This is a computer, Brandon. I can’t go to a news website without being assaulted by these strumpets.”

    Even better! Turn off the computer! Permanently!

    Comment by Brandon Explosion — August 7, 2007 @ 11:35 am | Reply

  23. “Even better! Turn off the computer! Permanently!”

    I shouldn’t have to restrict myself to a cave to avoid harlotry, Brandon. It’s much easier for our society to turn Lohan off than vice versa.

    Comment by Sisyphus — August 7, 2007 @ 1:02 pm | Reply

  24. “I shouldn’t have to restrict myself to a cave to avoid harlotry, Brandon.”

    I know, but for the good of humanity maybe you should.🙂

    Comment by Brandon Explosion — August 7, 2007 @ 2:08 pm | Reply

  25. I think it’s for the good of humanity that Lindsay Lohan be confined to a cave, Brandon. Maybe that’s why I’m going to Heaven, and you’ll be united with your sweet succubi Lohan and Hilton- in Hell.

    Comment by Sisyphus — August 8, 2007 @ 6:16 am | Reply

  26. Using MSNBC to make a point Sisyphus? A little hypocritical to say the least. Couldn’t find anything over on Faux News??

    btw, how do I get an icon/image next to my posts?

    Comment by Tyler Durden — August 8, 2007 @ 9:54 am | Reply

  27. “btw, how do I get an icon/image next to my posts?”

    You have to do that through WordPress. Start an account with them. They let you copy and paste the image.

    Comment by Sisyphus — August 8, 2007 @ 12:34 pm | Reply

  28. You may very well be the most ignorant person in the world. It must be so self-gratifying to be your own judge of your soul. After all, you state you’ll be going to heaven (nevermind your clear promotion of violence on others, willingness to impose sanctions on someone you’ve never met, intolerance towards anyone who disagrees with your views, and perennial idiocy).
    In the meantime, continue your efforts, civilized society (not your definition of it, everyone else’s) needs it’s clowns.

    Comment by you people are sick — August 16, 2007 @ 12:37 pm | Reply

  29. Drinking, drugging and fornicating with hedonistic abandon. Spawning illegitimate children and then abandoning them so they can continue their sick, sinful lifestyles. Is it any wonder the terrorists hate us? see more
    http://www.sykinfo.com/index.php

    Comment by madhura — August 17, 2007 @ 4:45 am | Reply

  30. “After all, you state you’ll be going to heaven (nevermind your clear promotion of violence on others, willingness to impose sanctions on someone you’ve never met, intolerance towards anyone who disagrees with your views, and perennial idiocy).”

    God tells us. Read the Bible.

    Comment by Sisyphus — August 20, 2007 @ 12:56 pm | Reply

  31. Sisyphus:

    So… If I go to Hell, I get to hang out with Lindsay Lohan? What about Jimi Hendrix? I always wanted to meet him and he played such good guitar…

    And also: if I go to Heaven, I have to hang around you people?

    Man, this “Hell” place sounds like a way better option. Where do I sign up?

    Comment by donkspeedonkdonk — August 26, 2007 @ 11:11 am | Reply

  32. Don’t worry, donk, you’ve already got a room prepared for you in Hell. Just keep doing what you’re doing and you’ll get there for sure. By the way, you won’t get to “hang out” with your favorite people in Hell. Otherwise it wouldn’t be Hell would it?

    Everyone gets customized torment down there, and it doesn’t include hanging out with your friends.

    Comment by Psycheout — August 26, 2007 @ 2:32 pm | Reply

  33. “Don’t worry, donk, you’ve already got a room prepared for you in Hell.”

    I do?! Sweet! Does it have a view?

    (Also: “Customized torment” sounds like a date with you, Psycheout.)

    Comment by donkspeedonkdonk — August 26, 2007 @ 8:42 pm | Reply

  34. IN MY OPINION, LOHAN IS A GREAT ACTRESS…AND YOU DO NOT HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO SAY ALL THAT BULLpoo ABOUT HER…YOU’RE SO freakin’ JEALOUS ABOUT HER ‘CAUSE MAYBE YOU’RE NOT AS GOOD…
    WELL, WITH ALL THE THINGS YOU’RE SAYING, ABOUT HER, YOU’RE NOT ON THE FAST TRACK TO HEAVEN!!!

    [Ed Note: Nice language. Are you a typical Lohan fan?]

    Comment by LOHAN FANN — August 27, 2007 @ 8:03 am | Reply

  35. IN MY OPINION, LOHAN IS A GREAT ACTRESS…AND YOU DO NOT HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO SAY ALL THAT BULLSHIT ABOUT HER…YOU’RE SO FUCKIN’ JEALOUS ABOUT HER ‘CAUSE MAYBE YOU’RE NOT AS GOOD…
    WELL, WITH ALL THE THINGS YOU’RE SAYING, ABOUT HER, YOU’RE NOT ON THE FAST TRACK TO HEAVEN!!!

    Comment by LOHANFANN — August 27, 2007 @ 8:05 am | Reply

  36. Vote Ron Paul.

    Comment by Spacebrother — August 27, 2007 @ 5:04 pm | Reply

  37. “I do?! Sweet! Does it have a view?”

    Yes, it does. Of Hell. That would make Camden, New Jersey or Fallujah, Iraq look like Paradise.

    “Vote Ron Paul.”

    I find it highly appropriate that this endorsement comes from someone posting under the handle “Spacebrother.”

    Comment by Sisyphus — August 27, 2007 @ 5:53 pm | Reply

  38. Hey! Who are you to go making complaints about the venerable state of New Jersey? I’ve never been there, but I’d be dollars to donuts that it’s better than whatever hellhole southern state you’re from.

    Okay, question, since you’re such an expert about this supposed place we go after we die, is Hell kind of like what it looks like in “Little Nicky”, with Dante-esque columns of fire and hot burning marl and noise, or is it more like the Sartrean vision where you’re trapped in a room with two really obnoxious women?

    Would BJ and and Mrs. TD Gaines-Crockett be there, if it’s the latter? If they’re unavailable, who would be the replacement?

    -YIMFCYDF, Baron Otto Von Donkspeedonkatronkadonkeyperson

    Comment by donkspeedonkdonk — August 27, 2007 @ 8:48 pm | Reply

  39. “Vote Ron Paul.”

    “I find it highly appropriate that this endorsement comes from someone posting under the handle “Spacebrother.””

    Ron Paul is the ONLY Republican who really has it right. The rest are either Conservative extremists or too Liberal. He’s the only TRUE pro life candidate.

    Comment by spacebrother — August 28, 2007 @ 4:55 am | Reply

  40. “Hey! Who are you to go making complaints about the venerable state of New Jersey? I’ve never been there, but I’d be dollars to donuts that it’s better than whatever hellhole southern state you’re from.”

    I lived there for three years. Currently, I reside in an undisclosed state in New England. The politics up here are even worse, but the scenery is far better than my former residence, Camden.

    “Okay, question, since you’re such an expert about this supposed place we go after we die, is Hell kind of like what it looks like in “Little Nicky”, with Dante-esque columns of fire and hot burning marl and noise, or is it more like the Sartrean vision where you’re trapped in a room with two really obnoxious women?”

    Why are you so sure the two are mutually exclusive?

    “Ron Paul is the ONLY Republican who really has it right. The rest are either Conservative extremists or too Liberal. He’s the only TRUE pro life candidate.”

    He’s a RINO who wants to cut and run from Iraq. I think we should hand him over to the Islamists in exchange for Bin Laden. He’d lead them better than Bin Laden does, anyway, so it’d be a fair exchange.

    Comment by Sisyphus — August 28, 2007 @ 8:56 am | Reply

  41. “Ron Paul is the ONLY Republican who really has it right. The rest are either Conservative extremists or too Liberal. He’s the only TRUE pro life candidate.”

    “He’s a RINO who wants to cut and run from Iraq. I think we should hand him over to the Islamists in exchange for Bin Laden. He’d lead them better than Bin Laden does, anyway, so it’d be a fair exchange.”

    Are you saying you’re NOT pro life Sisyphus? I guess that makes you a RINO.

    All rhetoric aside……..

    The REALITY is Bush has’nt pulled the troops out of this failure of a war in Iraq so he does’nt have to admit failure.

    The other REALITY is Bush failed to protect America from Bin Laden who is still running around. The Iraq war cost us any chance of getting proper justice for Bin Laden’s attack on US soil. The Republican/Democrat party elites cut and ran from getting Bin Laden when it came time to authorise the Iraq war. Thats the REALITY. Talk about dropping the ball big time.

    One more point – I thinks it’s comical and pathetic at the same time how so many voters are brainwashed by the main stream media into supporting the party elite status quo. People are inable to think for themselves because their tv/radio/newsprint tells them who to support. Ron Paul is’nt the MSM’s flavor of the week/month/year like most of the other candidates (from either party) and it’s likely most voters and bloggers here will ever admit that they are programmed to believe everything the MSM tells them. If most voters turned off their tv/radio and cancelled their publication subscribtions and voted purely on results rather than rhetoric and empty promises, then we may actually get a REAL leader who will do whats in the best interests of everybody instead of the privaledged few. Brownback does’nt fit that bill.

    Vote for Ron Paul.

    Comment by Spacebrother — August 28, 2007 @ 9:32 am | Reply

  42. “Are you saying you’re NOT pro life Sisyphus? I guess that makes you a RINO.”

    Pay attention, Space Cadet. I was talking about Iraq, not baby murder.

    “The REALITY is Bush has’nt pulled the troops out of this failure of a war in Iraq so he does’nt have to admit failure.

    The other REALITY is Bush failed to protect America from Bin Laden who is still running around. The Iraq war cost us any chance of getting proper justice for Bin Laden’s attack on US soil. The Republican/Democrat party elites cut and ran from getting Bin Laden when it came time to authorise the Iraq war. Thats the REALITY. Talk about dropping the ball big time.”

    Spoken like a true Copernican Darwinist Marxist secular-humanist. Why do you hate America?

    Comment by Sisyphus — August 28, 2007 @ 9:48 am | Reply

  43. “Spoken like a true Copernican Darwinist Marxist secular-humanist. Why do you hate America?”

    What the devil does Copernicus have to do with anything? Regardless, he was correct about a lot of things.

    Darwin was right too.

    And ten years will show that Marx was also right.

    So, really, while the stupid, melodramatic, over-the-top “Why do you hate America” question doesn’t deserve an answer in the least, if anything, one answer is that people (Myself, anyway) really have had it up to here with the States (Baptists especially) knowing SFA about Science and trying to push its ignorance on the rest of the scientific community.

    Comment by donkspeedonkdonk — August 28, 2007 @ 1:05 pm | Reply

  44. Spoken like a true Copernican Darwinist Marxist secular-humanist. Why do you hate America?

    Marxism, Darwin and Copernicus have absolutely nothing to do with Iraq, Bin Laden, the MSM, Bush, Cheney, Brownback or whatever fantasy you concoct. You’re programmed to believe what the MSMs right wing protocols tell you and fail to accept reality.

    Shut off your TV, radio and cancel your subscription to corporate control and become a REAL free thinker.

    Vote Ron Paul, the only real pro life white power candidate.

    Comment by spacebrother — August 29, 2007 @ 12:14 am | Reply

  45. Donkspeedonkdonk gets it.

    Comment by spacebrother — August 29, 2007 @ 12:15 am | Reply

  46. […] a relatively sinless childhood, to the epitome of national harlotry. She’s nearly on par with Lindsay Lohan and that French strumpet, Alizee. At least those two aren’t American, just French and/or […]

    Pingback by Beyonce Must Face Justice! « Blogs 4 Brownback — August 31, 2007 @ 9:06 am | Reply

  47. […] look back on our extensive Lindsay Lohan coverage to see a train wreck of sin and debauchery in slow motion.  It’s not […]

    Pingback by Sin Kills « Blogs 4 Brownback — September 4, 2007 @ 2:57 pm | Reply

  48. Vote Ron Paul, the only real pro life ***white power*** candidate.

    Comment by spacebrother — August 29, 2007 @ 12:14 am

    ***embellishment courtesy of Sisyphus***

    [Ed Note: Idiocy courtesy of spacebrother.]

    Comment by spacebrother — September 4, 2007 @ 3:00 pm | Reply

  49. Vote Ron Paul, the only real pro life ***white power*** candidate.

    Comment by spacebrother — August 29, 2007 @ 12:14 am

    ***embellishment courtesy of Sisyphus***

    %%%[Ed Note: Idiocy courtesy of spacebrother.]%%%

    Comment by spacebrother — September 4, 2007 @ 3:00 pm

    %%%-Fascism courtesy of some blog altering censorship supporting America hating Jonestown type Koolade drinking Brownback/Bush Nazi-%%%

    Comment by Spacebrother — September 11, 2007 @ 8:36 am | Reply

  50. Hi Lindsey Lohan,
    I am a huge fan of yours you are an awesome singer and an increible actiz. I hope I can meet you so day I’ve a companied you sense your first movie. Thanks for being a great actiz and singer.

    Comment by Marcella — September 14, 2007 @ 7:52 pm | Reply

  51. “A civilized society would have flogged her in the public square by now. And then buried her up to her neck in an anthill.”

    my my siffylus, you are a sadistic sob aren’t you? what’s wrong? you not getting any so you have to put down everyone who is,, or do you believe yourself to be perfect and therefore qualified to judge others? Oh wait, doesn’t your bible warn against judging others? Do you feel godly enough to take over god’s job and do the judging yourself? I really don’t think God wants idiots like you to judge people. Perhaps we should just bury you up to your neck in an anthill, at least you would really deserve it for inciting people to commit crimes against other citizens. You should be sent to Guantanamo where you would be sexually assaulted, but then again, you may enjoy it, you strike me as the type that would like a good reaming.

    Comment by Arn Lewis — November 1, 2007 @ 8:29 am | Reply

  52. I will pray for you, Arn. You need it.

    Comment by Sisyphus — November 7, 2007 @ 12:19 pm | Reply

  53. perhaps you should pray for yourself while you’re at it, you could use some forgiveness for your hypocracy

    [Ed Note: And you could use some for your spelling! It’s spelled “hypocrisy.”]

    Comment by Arn Lewis — November 7, 2007 @ 8:55 pm | Reply

  54. I shouldn’t have to restrict myself to a cave to avoid harlotry, Brandon. It’s much easier for our society to turn Lohan off than vice versa.

    Comment by Sisyphus — August 7, 2007 @ 1:02 pm

    I would much rather turn her on than off, she may be a bit slutty, but she is still hot, I wouldn’t mind being burned by her firecrotch.

    Comment by Arn Lewis — November 7, 2007 @ 9:01 pm | Reply

  55. I’d do her.

    Comment by spacebrother — November 13, 2007 @ 12:11 am | Reply

  56. I’ve noticed that the editor only comments when he can get a cheap shot in. anything that has a good argument gets ignored.

    [Ed Note: Your mother wears combat boots and dresses you funny. How’s that for a cheap shot? :-)]

    Comment by Elephant Bones — November 14, 2007 @ 4:10 pm | Reply

  57. i hate most celebrities as much as the next guy, but sending them to Gitmo? seriously, you guys have no sense of restraint. LIVE AND LET BE

    Comment by Elephant Bones — November 14, 2007 @ 4:20 pm | Reply

  58. “I would much rather turn her on than off, she may be a bit slutty, but she is still hot, I wouldn’t mind being burned by her firecrotch.”

    Her harlotry is a trap to lure you into Hell. Do not let yourself be tempted!

    Comment by Sisyphus — November 15, 2007 @ 7:38 am | Reply

  59. [Ed Note: Your mother wears combat boots and dresses you funny. How’s that for a cheap shot? :-)]
    pretty good cheap shot, i must admit, though i’ve had better. of course, you did just prove my point, and now you look like a jackass for all the internet to see. lose the battle, win the war. SUN TZU, BABY! and for the record, my mom is dead.

    [Ed Note: I am sorry for your loss. Really.]

    Comment by Elephant Bones — November 16, 2007 @ 1:10 am | Reply

  60. no, you’re not, but that’s okay, i want nothing to do with your regard for human life

    Comment by Elephant Bones — November 18, 2007 @ 1:29 am | Reply

  61. did someone say trap? cause i think i heard someone say trap

    Comment by Admiral Ackbar — November 18, 2007 @ 1:31 am | Reply

  62. Never have I seen the sin of Eve become so evil. And I thought abortion was bad… yikes! We must work to stop all future outbreaks of harlotry:

    -Have women be owned by their fathers until they are married. Once married, they are owned by their husbands. Widows and orphans can be owned by the church. When women are considered property, the abortion and euthanisia rate is sure to plummet, and sexual sin will not manifest itself often, if at all.
    -Keep women out of public life. The Sin of Eve manifests itself greatest in females that do not keep to the private sphere. I can’t see much reason why a woman should leave home. Maybe in exceptional cases they can obtain permits. If the husband is taking them through public, the woman ought to be bound in chains and doubly veiled. This is the best precaution we can take against the Sin of Eve during female transportation. Public venues should ban women no exceptions, for the Sin should not be allowed to infilitrate God’s structure under any circumstance. Also, don’t let women talk to strangers AT ALL. When they do, they are going to be pregnant before you know it.
    -Don’t let women testify in the courts. They will lead to your demise, men! Women are too stupid to defend themselves, and your property will be in danger!
    -The only thing a women should have authority over is the homeschooling facility and children. Otherwise, anything a woman could lead in, a man could do better, for the Sin of Eve is not upon him.
    -Women menustrate as a direct result from the Sin of Eve. They are unclean during these periods, and need to be confined away from your property at these times.

    When these rules are broken, we get harlots like THIS. Lohan and the rest of her ilk are a result of allowing ‘women’s liberation’ and letting it run amok. The utter irrelevance of women outside of the private sphere is clear. St. Augustine, Martin Luther, whatever, the key leaders of the Church knew that women were pure evil.

    Comment by Bob_Corker — November 19, 2007 @ 9:29 pm | Reply

  63. holy mother of god, bob. i can’t believe you just said that. why have the mods not banned you yet?

    Comment by Elephant Bones — November 26, 2007 @ 3:42 pm | Reply

  64. I like the way you cut through to the heart of the matter, Bob.

    Comment by Sisyphus — December 5, 2007 @ 1:58 pm | Reply

  65. At times, the police question me on why my wife’s bosoms are strapped to her armpits when we go to barbeque joints. Lately, I have been putting her in a Rubik’s Cube costume so that her bosoms aren’t exposed at all, but it’s a bit of a hassle getting them inside the costume. Do you have a more practical suggestion, Sisyphus?

    Comment by bobcorker — December 11, 2007 @ 6:59 pm | Reply

  66. Bobcock, what an idiot, I hope Lyssie reads this and rips you a new a** hole. Women are evil? You are evil, you cold hearted worthless little twerp. I hope every woman on this site sees that comment and sees you for the chauvinistic little bastard that you are.
    Bobcock hates women, so now we know where his sexual preferences really lie.

    Comment by Arn — December 11, 2007 @ 7:08 pm | Reply

  67. Arn, if you aren’t going to help me with your dilema, why do you comment? Women can get to heaven, you know. I’m trying to keep my wife from being raped by environmentalists and their ilk.

    Wait, I thought you said that you were going to refuse to acknowledge me. You clearly haven’t. Please start and don’t stop.

    Comment by bobcorker — December 11, 2007 @ 7:11 pm | Reply

  68. Sorry, but when someone disrespects women the way you do, somebody needs to say something, it’s for your own good, to keep you from going too far and getting your head blown off by some guy that actually likes and respects women.

    Comment by Arn — December 11, 2007 @ 7:18 pm | Reply

  69. “Sorry, but when someone disrespects women the way you do, somebody needs to say something, it’s for your own good, to keep you from going too far and getting your head blown off by some guy that actually likes and respects women.”

    1. How is anything I said misogynistic in comment 65? My wife simply tends to get lots of stares from fornicators. I intend to stop these stares, but not by keeping her in a dark room and never letting her out. That’s cruel.
    2. Why do you care if my head gets blown off?

    Comment by bobcorker — December 11, 2007 @ 7:21 pm | Reply

  70. I was referring to comment #62, read it over in case you’re too stupid to remember what you wrote.

    And everyone else here link comment 62 to every woman you know. Find out just how much the women would appreciate your feelings towards women, as I said, any man that hates women that much has to be a homo.

    Comment by Arn — December 11, 2007 @ 7:25 pm | Reply

  71. And you’re rightm, I really wouldn’t care in the least if someone blew your head off, wasn’t anyhing in it anyway.

    Comment by Arn — December 11, 2007 @ 7:26 pm | Reply

  72. “I was referring to comment #62, read it over in case you’re too stupid to remember what you wrote.”

    Excuses. You mentioned that post on “I Love You”. Don’t try to BS me.

    “Find out just how much the women would appreciate your feelings towards women, as I said, any man that hates women that much has to be a homo.”

    Homosexuals should be executed. At least women can be good warriors of Christ. Only rapists/murderers/kidnappers/atheists/furries are worse than homosexuals.

    Comment by bobcorker — December 11, 2007 @ 7:29 pm | Reply

  73. Anyways, Sisyphus, I see that our future conversation is already being interrupeted by the atheist hippy scum Born Clueless. This is a serious manner, and you are one of the only people I know to ask for advice. My wife was unable to go to her conservative book club this Wednesday because we can’t think of a way to restrain her glands without drawing attention. She weeped and cried all night on the bed, and I felt really bad for her until she woke me up in the middle of the night. I administered the proper beating at this point, but the problem still persists! How do you let your wife go into public without looking like a strumpet? I am relying on your superior intellect on this one, Sisyphus.

    Comment by Bob_Corker — December 13, 2007 @ 11:07 pm | Reply

  74. “Spoken like a true Copernican Darwinist Marxist secular-humanist. Why do you hate America?”

    i hate how just because someone actually stands up and speaks against our terrible president or this rediculous war, you say they hate america. it is in fact the exact opposite. if you could open your f*cking eyes and see beyond the bull that the government and media feed us every day, you would see that there are thousands of men and women needlessly dieing for a rediculous war that we shouldn’t have started in the first place. and that’s not even including the thousands more who are dieing from all the private fighting organizations. WHEN WILL YOU WAKE UP AND REALIZE THAT JUST BECAUSE THIS IDIOT PREACHES CHRISTIAN MORALES AND CLAIMS TO BE SO WONDERFUL DOESN’T MEAN THAT YOU SHOULD AUTOMATICALLY TRUST HIM AND HIS REGIME OF FEAR?!?! AND WTF HAPPENED TO THE SEPERATION OF CHURCH AND STATE ANYWAY? RELIGION HAS NO PLACE IN OUR GOVERNMENT THAT’S BEEN THE IDEA SINCE IT WAS FIRST ESTABLISHED, IF YOU HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THAT AND FEEL THE CHURCH NEEDS TO CONTROL EVERYTHING THAN MOVE SOMEWHERE ELSE! I’M SO SICK OF IGNORANT BIBLE THUMPING RETARDS LIKE YOU! STOP SPEWING YOUR RELIGIOUS CRAP ON THE INTERNET, NO ONE CARES!!! YOUR PISS ME OFF!!! AND IF YOU THINK I’M GOING TO YOUR REDICULOUS CHRISTIAN HELL, PISS OFF! I DON’T BELIEVE IN HELL AND NOTHING YOU CAN SAY TO ME WILL CHANGE THAT!

    Comment by youpeoplesickenme — December 19, 2007 @ 12:14 am | Reply

  75. “Homosexuals should be executed. At least women can be good warriors of Christ. Only rapists/murderers/kidnappers/atheists/furries are worse than homosexuals.”

    what if your child was a homosexual? would you still wield your close-minded hate on them? YOU ARE NOT GOD YOU CANNOT/HAVE NO RIGHT TO JUDGE OTHERS! ONLY HE CAN MAKE THAT DECISION, AND IF YOU ASK ME I THINK HE’D BE SICKENED BY YOUR BLASPHEMOUS VENOM! YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO EXIST IN THIS WORLD! AND BOB, IF YOU WANT TO TREAT WOMEN LIKE SLAVES MOVE TO IRAN AND GET THE HELL OUT OF OUR FREE COUNTRY!!!

    Comment by youpeoplesickenme — December 19, 2007 @ 12:28 am | Reply

  76. “Homosexuals should be executed. At least women can be good warriors of Christ. Only rapists/murderers/kidnappers/atheists/furries are worse than homosexuals.”

    Comment by bobcorker — December 11, 2007 @ 7:29 pm

    Kill yourself.

    Comment by Spacebrother — December 20, 2007 @ 12:36 pm | Reply

  77. You’re an evil man, Spacebrother.

    Comment by Sisyphus — January 25, 2008 @ 2:12 pm | Reply

  78. “Anyways, Sisyphus, I see that our future conversation is already being interrupeted by the atheist hippy scum Born Clueless. This is a serious manner, and you are one of the only people I know to ask for advice. My wife was unable to go to her conservative book club this Wednesday because we can’t think of a way to restrain her glands without drawing attention. She weeped and cried all night on the bed, and I felt really bad for her until she woke me up in the middle of the night. I administered the proper beating at this point, but the problem still persists! How do you let your wife go into public without looking like a strumpet? I am relying on your superior intellect on this one, Sisyphus.”

    I apologize for the delayed response, Bob. The troll comments obscured yours, unfortunately.

    Usually, my wife does not go out in public. When she does, she consistently has her chest strapped down. If your wife has difficulty with this, I would suggest a different conservative book club, one where she could appear with her chest strapped down without drawing undue attention. If that’s not possible for you, I would keep her locked in an attic or basement. Avoiding temptation is far more important than a book club, you must admit. Only let her our for church if she insists upon displaying her glands for the lustful eyes of others. That’s my advice, anyway. I hope I’m understanding your situation correctly.

    I will pray for you, Bob.

    Comment by Sisyphus — January 25, 2008 @ 2:17 pm | Reply

  79. “I DON’T BELIEVE IN HELL AND NOTHING YOU CAN SAY TO ME WILL CHANGE THAT!”

    We don’t have to say anything. Hell is real regardless of your beliefs. I will pray for you, though. You seem to have BDS, and are a typical unhinged liberal.

    Comment by Sisyphus — January 25, 2008 @ 2:20 pm | Reply

  80. “Usually, my wife does not go out in public. When she does, she consistently has her chest strapped down. If your wife has difficulty with this, I would suggest a different conservative book club, one where she could appear with her chest strapped down without drawing undue attention. If that’s not possible for you, I would keep her locked in an attic or basement. Avoiding temptation is far more important than a book club, you must admit. Only let her our for church if she insists upon displaying her glands for the lustful eyes of others. That’s my advice, anyway. I hope I’m understanding your situation correctly.”

    Your prayers worked wonders, Sisyphus! We found better chest straps, Sisyphus. It turned out that we had used those straps for too long, and we all know what “wear and tear” (actually just the inevitable assault on material objects by demons) does. However, I did find a solution: My wife’s book club shall now meet at my house. If we see an atheist or other degenerate/infilitrator step foot in our house, we can easily deal with them. If she is being too much of a harlot, I have prepared a Hall of Mirrors where I can lock her away, and where she can think about her lust. Your advise was very influential in my discovery, however. I can’t thank you enough for it.

    “YOU ARE NOT GOD YOU CANNOT/HAVE NO RIGHT TO JUDGE OTHERS!”

    Actually, we must judge others if we are to keep them from the fires of hell. Christ wasn’t taking an absolutist position; He was talking about premature statements about people before you know them. Read your Bible better.

    Comment by bobcorker — January 25, 2008 @ 3:38 pm | Reply

  81. Actually we are not to judge others. Judgement is reserved for Christ alone. It is not up to people of this earth to Forcefully keep others from the fires of hell. If that is where they are going to go, then they are going to go there regardless.

    Also, forgetting which comment out of the many ludacris ones stated above, the temptation of Eve is not that of woman but of life. In Hebrew, where the first mention of Eve exists is defined as “life”. Man’s temptaion was of life and the quest for the knowledge of good and evil, which we THINK we know, but only God can ultimately know this. We have been informed of how to live by Jesus Christ, but we were NEVER told to enoforce this upon others, just explain to them and pray for them in hopes that them seeing you live a good Christian life will make them want to convert.

    The stuff regarding women and only to be kept in the private sphere was meant for Old Testiment. When Jesus came, the old laws were thrown out and a new path shown in the life lived by Jesus Christ.

    Now on the issue that this was supposed to be based on…
    I believe that Lindsey Lohan has many problems that need to be solved with spiritual unification with God. This cannot be done by anything other than this. And it is up to you as a parent to shield your children if the life Lindsey Lohan is living is corrupting them. It is the same with blaming games for children going out and fighting. Parents are the ones responsible for the correct upbringing of their children, not the government or censorship.

    Another side note,
    This country was not founded on the Principles of Christianity, but of basic instinct principles for the sanctity of human life. All religions and even peoples without a religion can come together on these beliefs, such as “do not kill, do not steal, do not lie.” Only two of the fathers were Christian, the rest were pagan or naturalists.

    Comment by Jeff — January 28, 2008 @ 7:12 pm | Reply

  82. “Your prayers worked wonders, Sisyphus! We found better chest straps, Sisyphus. It turned out that we had used those straps for too long, and we all know what “wear and tear” (actually just the inevitable assault on material objects by demons) does. However, I did find a solution: My wife’s book club shall now meet at my house. If we see an atheist or other degenerate/infilitrator step foot in our house, we can easily deal with them. If she is being too much of a harlot, I have prepared a Hall of Mirrors where I can lock her away, and where she can think about her lust. Your advise was very influential in my discovery, however. I can’t thank you enough for it.”

    You’re welcome, Bob. The Lord provides for His servants.

    “This country was not founded on the Principles of Christianity, but of basic instinct principles for the sanctity of human life. All religions and even peoples without a religion can come together on these beliefs, such as “do not kill, do not steal, do not lie.” Only two of the fathers were Christian, the rest were pagan or naturalists.”

    Nonsense. This country was founded on Christianity. Read the documents.

    Comment by Sisyphus — January 29, 2008 @ 2:05 pm | Reply

  83. liondsey ur going to hell cause uve been bad wen u done parents trap u was good

    Comment by jireh — February 2, 2008 @ 1:37 pm | Reply

  84. I think its kinda funny of how many pervs get to your site…haha I like it…any other wierd ways? If you want to download all her naked pics (for the pervs) go here:
    http://www.humperville.com/viewtopic.php?t=2502

    Comment by Big Jake — February 21, 2008 @ 11:56 pm | Reply

  85. Author, it’s your best post in this blog. I sent it to all my friends! Big thanks for article.

    Comment by Buy keftab — March 19, 2008 @ 8:31 am | Reply

  86. yes, she should be imprisonated for putting other people in danger by driving drunk.
    the charge of hedonism, when your country lacks the characteristic of being a theocracy is kind of non-existant…there should be a lot to say about your fundamantalism, it would be long…I can’t believe america’s still there.

    Comment by juls — March 20, 2008 @ 5:27 pm | Reply

  87. I need a nice girls .iam a teacher 30years old .i live hn saveh near teran.

    Comment by amin — May 17, 2008 @ 9:38 pm | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: