Blogs 4 Brownback

July 30, 2007

Tom Tancredo: No “War on Terror”

Filed under: Nutjobs,Tom Tancredo,War on Terror — Psycheout @ 11:38 pm

The Tom Tancredo Show!Tom Tancredo, the single-issue candidate who hates anyone who might come to America from south of the border and who happily takes money from John Tanton, a freaky population-control weirdo affiliated with abortion mill Planned Parenthood, is at it again:

Republican presidential candidate Tom Tancredo says the U.S. isn’t waging a “war on terror.”

Thank you, nutball. Oh, there’s more? How about a side order of Democrat party talking points, please?

“Terrorism is a tactic. It is not the thing with which we are at war.”

His staff of handlers and psychiatrists then helpfully emptied Tommy’s overflowing drool bucket. It was described as “wet and foamy.” Tom’s diaper, however, appeared to be dry, said one observer who wished to remain anonymous.

In addition to differing with President Bush over the “war on terror” label, Tancredo labeled the immigration reform bill Bush tried to rally through congress as “amnesty” for illegals.

An anonymous source described it as an “it ain’t right if you ain’t white” speech. “He sure hates him those brown skinned folks,” he or she added. “It’s like night and day when y’all compare him to Brownback. Now that’s a real conservative.”

“I like mavericks.”

You like John McCain? I like pudding. Apparently the drool bucket needed emptying again, according to an on-the-scene observer.

Tancredo campaigned today in Grinnell, speaking with a crowd of about 30 people in the West Side Family Diner.

Nobody knew who the raving lunatic was, but they did have a good meal. And the price was reasonable. And entertainment of any kind in Grinnell was most welcome. Even a crazy soliloquy from a “The End Is Nigh” guy.

“I’m not going to say I’m going to win it.”

Most in attendance seemed to agree with this statement made in a rare moment of candor. Onlookers nodded sagely.

“I don’t have to win.”

According to witnesses, the crowd cheered and gave the unknown diner a standing ovation at this point. “It really brought the house down,” recalled one diner who left a three dollar tip.

Tom Tancredo. What more can be said? Less is more, as the saying goes.

— Psycheout

11 Comments »

  1. So this is what Brownback supporters have to do in order give themselves any kind of edge over the other candidates? Bash the heck out of someone by taking what they say out of context? Why don’t you be a kind chap and finish the rest of the sentence which includes his explanation for why it’s not a “War on terror”?

    Here i’ll do it. I don’t even know what he really said but i’m guessing this is what he explained:

    We are not fighting “terrorism”, we are fighting radical Islam. “Terror” is what these Islamic Extremists use to gain power and spread influence, which is why they are such a threat. So saying it is a “War on Terror” isn’t really true of what we’re doing, it is a “War on Radical Islam”. Now that’s a Democratic Talking point???

    There’s definitely one demographic which Brownback will definitely win, the stupid vote.

    Comment by Wow — July 31, 2007 @ 1:48 am | Reply

  2. As for the donations thing…..who cares who gives him money? As long as he isn’t influenced by it. Tancredo has an A rating by the National Right to Life and has always voted against Abortion and has never said anything hinting that he might support it. So until he does, I have no reason to worry. I’m assuming Tanton donated because he likes Tancredo’s views on immigration. If Tanton gave money because he thinks he can sway Tancredo on abortion then he’s an idiot. That money is currently being put to use campaigning AGAINST abortion.

    Comment by Wow — July 31, 2007 @ 1:53 am | Reply

  3. Ask yourself something Psycheout, can you ‘win’ a “war on terror”?

    If so, what the heck does that look like?

    Comment by ChenZhen — July 31, 2007 @ 1:56 am | Reply

  4. I don’t even know what he really said but i’m guessing

    Excellent argument, Wow, you win hands down!

    As for the donations thing…..who cares who gives him money?

    Wow, look up the word “principle.”

    I’m assuming Tanton donated because he likes Tancredo’s views on immigration.

    I’m assuming Tanton supports Tancredo because he’s a racist and a population-control weirdo. And The Tanc gladly accepts the money because he’s a Colorado streetwalker.

    But if you like racists, go ahead and support Tancredo/Tanton in 2008, you disgusting sellout. You make me sick.

    Comment by Psycheout — July 31, 2007 @ 2:24 am | Reply

  5. If so, what the heck does that look like?

    Don’t tell me you’re a defeatist, ChenZhen. I have too much respect for you to believe that.

    Comment by Psycheout — July 31, 2007 @ 2:25 am | Reply

  6. YOu know, he´s right about that. Waging war on some shawowy thing called terrorism isn´t really possible. The best you could do would be to wage it on a person (Osama), an organisation (al-Quaida) or a country (Iraq) or perhaps a worldview of a few nutjobs (radical islam) but not on an idea or a tactic. Doing the latter is futile.

    Terrorism and guerilla warfare will exist forever. They´re proven to work and thus anyone and his mother will use them if motivated enough. Heck, YOU used guerilla warfare in the same style as today´s insurgents in Iraq do to get the british out of your country!

    It´s the same as the “war against drugs”. As long as someone´s willing to produce the stuff and someone willing to buy it, i´t will keep existing.

    But hey, please go on with your war on terror and keep getting blown the heck out of yourtroops in Iraq. Meanwhile, my country´s gonna get some plus points by helping ISAF rebuilding Afghanistan. Oh, btw, our losses are about 21 men in the last 5 years. How many have the great USA lost? OOOPS!

    Comment by PG — July 31, 2007 @ 4:36 am | Reply

  7. We’ve lost far too many to continue this dumb conflict for much longer.

    Comment by Brandon Explosion — July 31, 2007 @ 8:17 am | Reply

  8. Don’t tell me you’re a defeatist, ChenZhen. I have too much respect for you to believe that.

    I can’t stop you from applying any label you wish to. However, I don’t think it’s “defeatist” to worry about things we’ve done in the name of a “war” that -by definition-cannot be won.

    Comment by ChenZhen — July 31, 2007 @ 2:21 pm | Reply

  9. a “war” that…cannot be won.

    Well, there you go again.

    Comment by Psycheout — July 31, 2007 @ 2:29 pm | Reply

  10. Psychout, just let me know when “terror” surrenders , OK?

    Comment by ChenZhen — July 31, 2007 @ 2:42 pm | Reply

  11. […] It would seem that Newt Gingrich has gone even further into moonbat territory than The Tanc did recently.  While Tancredo argued over semantics, Newt channels Cindy Sheehan and says we’re losing. […]

    Pingback by Newt Gingrich: Defeatist « Blogs 4 Brownback — August 4, 2007 @ 7:04 pm | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: