Blogs 4 Brownback

July 28, 2007

Good!

A. GorillaApparently, those gorillas that tempt the Darwinists to sin so much will soon meet their moonbat lovers in Hell:

The shooting deaths of four mountain gorillas — three females and an alpha male silverback — are prompting a United Nations agency to send a mission to the Democratic Republic of Congo.

Rangers made the gruesome find in the southern sector of Virunga National Park earlier this week, said Flora and Fauna International, an organization that acts to conserve threatened species and ecosystems. The group said it is unclear who shot the gorillas or why.

“Just over 700 mountain gorillas survive in the wild today, and none exist in captivity,” Flora and Fauna International said in a statement. “For such a small population, the unnecessary and indiscriminate killing of four mountain gorillas is a huge loss.”

We all know the real purpose of this trip, of course- the pedophiliac UN workers want a chance to propogate with gorillas before the pious Rwandan poachers finally eliminate this deviant harlotry from the planet once and for all. If it was good enough for their grandparents, it’s good enough for the treefrogs of today. Leftists breed with gorillas, then tell us that our parents bred with gorillas, too. It’s insanity incarnate.

I, for one, salute the Rwandans and Congolese. They’re the only ones taking concrete steps to eradicate this menace for future generations. The web of Darwinist lies is about to lose a major source of spool. We are that much closer to killing this abhorrent spider once and for all, thanks to the God-fearing efforts of the African peasantry.

We who are going to church tomorrow salute you, gorilla-slayers! They who are about to fornicate and consume alcohol and drugs tomorrow will not share our sentiments. They’re forlorn over the loss of their opportunity to sate their bestial carnalities, and will likely drown their sorrows in grog. I, for one, find little pity for them. Now they’re going to have to marry human women and breed non-Darwinist children, the way God intended.

Update (by Psycheout): NOTE: This is wrong.

King Kong Wrong

“I’m not ready to evolve, Kong.”
“Too bad, girly, Darwin says you are.”

Update 2 (by Psycheout): This, too, is wrong.

Robin Williams Hearts Koko

Robin Williams (aka Mork) Hearts Koko
This is wrong.  Are wedding bells next?

167 Comments »

  1. Beautifully put, Sisyphus. Bravo to you for speaking the truth in a language that even the simplest of Liberal minds should be able to comprehend.

    Comment by Mrs. T.D. Gaines-Crockett — July 28, 2007 @ 8:19 am | Reply

  2. Thank you, Mrs. Gaines-Crockett. Now let’s see one of these dishonest liars try to argue with me about it. They dig themselves deeper into the hole with every weaselly equivocation.

    Comment by Sisyphus — July 28, 2007 @ 8:33 am | Reply

  3. Apes are just creatures twisted by Satan to mock Jesus by giving EVILolition credibility. Further more they are naturally lust crazed for human women. Since they are not natural creatures they should be exterminated forthwith as the tools of evil they are.

    Comment by BJ Tabor — July 28, 2007 @ 8:35 am | Reply

  4. Here come the weaselly equivocations …

    This is madness! Madness? This is Sparta!

    You base your argument on the idea that Leftists breed with gorillas. Have you got a source, stating that bestiality is based on which side of the political spectrum you are on?

    Comment by interpreted — July 28, 2007 @ 9:12 am | Reply

  5. Apes truly are some of the most evil and vile creatures on God’s green earth. And we must prevent people from fornicating with them–did you know that’s how AIDS started?

    Comment by Archangel Michael — July 28, 2007 @ 9:25 am | Reply

  6. All I ask is why, Sisyphus? Isn’t there a commandment against bearing false witness? You’re only damning yourelf.

    Comment by Adam Nelson — July 28, 2007 @ 10:23 am | Reply

  7. I saw that King Kong movie where that blonde strumpet mated with a giant gorilla.

    Comment by Maura Ghee — July 28, 2007 @ 11:49 am | Reply

  8. The shooting deaths of four mountain gorillas — three females and an alpha male silverback — are prompting a United Nations agency to send a mission to the Democratic Republic of Congo.

    Mm. Too bad that the UN didn’t see fit to react when so many HUMANS were being shot in Rwanda.

    Comment by Lyssie — July 28, 2007 @ 12:01 pm | Reply

  9. “We all know the real purpose of this trip, of course- the pedophiliac UN workers want a chance to propogate with gorillas before the pious Rwandan poachers finally eliminate this deviant harlotry from the planet once and for all. If it was good enough for their grandparents, it’s good enough for the treefrogs of today. Leftists breed with gorillas, then tell us that our parents bred with gorillas, too. It’s insanity incarnate.”

    PROVE IT. The two words you fear the most, right Sisyphus?

    “Apes truly are some of the most evil and vile creatures on God’s green earth. And we must prevent people from fornicating with them–did you know that’s how AIDS started?”

    That’s actually not how AIDS (HIV) started. That’s a rumor. Apes are some of the more intelligent species we have on the planet. They are fascinating, beautiful, and peaceful creatures. Anyone who begs for the blood to be spilled is without empathy.

    “I saw that King Kong movie where that blonde strumpet mated with a giant gorilla.”

    You obviously DIDN’T see the movie.

    “Mm. Too bad that the UN didn’t see fit to react when so many HUMANS were being shot in Rwanda.”

    Sadly, this is true. However, this article is about just one agency in the UN, a group devoted to animal conservation.

    Comment by Brandon Explosion — July 28, 2007 @ 12:47 pm | Reply

  10. Lyssie,

    “We all know the real purpose of this trip, of course- the pedophiliac UN workers want a chance to propogate with gorillas before the pious Rwandan poachers finally eliminate this deviant harlotry from the planet once and for all. If it was good enough for their grandparents, it’s good enough for the treefrogs of today. Leftists breed with gorillas, then tell us that our parents bred with gorillas, too. It’s insanity incarnate.

    I, for one, salute the Rwandans and Congolese. They’re the only ones taking concrete steps to
    eradicate this menace for future generations. The web of Darwinist lies is about to lose a major source of spool. We are that much closer to killing this abhorrent spider once and for all, thanks to the God-fearing efforts of the African peasantry.”

    As a mother and a decent person, how can you sit by and support this kind of talk? Is this what you actually believe? How can you side with someone such a Sisyphus, who holds only hate in his heart? Or Gaines-Crockett, who routinely cries for the blood of innocents? How can you put up with such hate overflowing from their minds and onto this site?

    Please tell me you disagree with this.

    Comment by Brandon Explosion — July 28, 2007 @ 12:52 pm | Reply

  11. Apparently Brandy is not familiar with our friend the metaphor. And we all have our own opinions. I don’t think you’re going to get Lyssie to attack her fellow B4B’rs for exercising their First Amendment rights.

    Comment by Psycheout — July 28, 2007 @ 1:13 pm | Reply

  12. “You base your argument on the idea that Leftists breed with gorillas. Have you got a source, stating that bestiality is based on which side of the political spectrum you are on?”

    Yes. It’s called “Origin of the Species,” written by your friend.

    “Apes truly are some of the most evil and vile creatures on God’s green earth. And we must prevent people from fornicating with them–did you know that’s how AIDS started?”

    AIDS is God’s punishment for unnatural sex and fornication.

    “All I ask is why, Sisyphus? Isn’t there a commandment against bearing false witness? You’re only damning yourelf.”

    What are you babbling about, treefrog? I’m not the one who met his thing-friend at the zoo, like some of the leftists who hang out here apparently did.

    “I saw that King Kong movie where that blonde strumpet mated with a giant gorilla.”

    It’s a good movie, and it’s good for highlighting the depravity of the Left. So is this:

    “Too bad that the UN didn’t see fit to react when so many HUMANS were being shot in Rwanda.”

    Those Rwandan humans weren’t their girlfriends, though. That’s the difference. They’d rather see humans die so their mates can live. Decent folk don’t see it that way.

    Comment by Sisyphus — July 28, 2007 @ 1:17 pm | Reply

  13. “PROVE IT. The two words you fear the most, right Sisyphus?”

    I think your friend Darwin already proved it for me.

    “That’s actually not how AIDS (HIV) started. That’s a rumor. Apes are some of the more intelligent species we have on the planet. They are fascinating, beautiful, and peaceful creatures. Anyone who begs for the blood to be spilled is without empathy.”

    You are a complete pervert.

    Comment by Sisyphus — July 28, 2007 @ 1:19 pm | Reply

  14. Ok, Sisyphus, since you seem to think that Evolution has something to do with real humans having sex with real apes. First off, that’s wrong, because neither humans nor apes existed during the split that led to the two species.

    As you OBVIOUSLY know a lot about Darwin and evolution in general, why don’t you give me a Darwin quote that even remotely suggests that people had sex with monkeys. I dare you.

    If you cannot do something as basic as that, then you have proven that you actually know nothing about what you’re talking about.

    Comment by Adam Nelson — July 28, 2007 @ 2:00 pm | Reply

  15. ‘We are that much closer to killing this abhorrent spider’

    Don’t do that! What about Brownback’s pro-spider leanings?

    ‘Too bad that the UN didn’t see fit to react when so many HUMANS were being shot in Rwanda.’

    I’m afraid I’ve got to support the UN here – Dallaire, their representative on the ground, had been saying ‘quick, we need to protect these Tutsis, look at all the guns and grenades that the Hutus are importing’ for nearly six months before the genocide took place. The UN did intervene at the start, but there were very few peace-keepers, and when nearly all of the Belgians (the largest contingent) were all brutally massacred, it was the UN Security Council member countries who refused to allocate more troops, or more mandate. Sure, the UN isn’t blameless, but the SC countries take a lot of the blame.

    ‘Yes. It’s called “Origin of the Species,” written by your friend.’

    Wuh?

    How does that work? How could there even be humans at all to mate with apes, if they hadn’t evolved from them first? Also, I would like to reiterate Adam’s point – find a quote in your source that backs up what you’re saying. With page references, please.

    Comment by interpreted — July 28, 2007 @ 2:13 pm | Reply

  16. “Apparently Brandy is not familiar with our friend the metaphor.”

    Enlighten us on what metaphor you speak of, Psycheout.

    Sissyfuss, (burn!)

    “Yes. It’s called “Origin of the Species,” written by your friend.”

    Yes, bring us this quote. And yes, it’s up to you to put up or shut up.

    In fact, don’t make another post here until you do. Otherwise, you’ll have proven yourself wrong again. You’ll have proven that you know nothing.

    Comment by Brandon Explosion — July 28, 2007 @ 2:20 pm | Reply

  17. I’m afraid I’ve got to support the UN here – Dallaire, their representative on the ground, had been saying ‘quick, we need to protect these Tutsis, look at all the guns and grenades that the Hutus are importing’ for nearly six months before the genocide took place. The UN did intervene at the start, but there were very few peace-keepers, and when nearly all of the Belgians (the largest contingent) were all brutally massacred, it was the UN Security Council member countries who refused to allocate more troops, or more mandate. Sure, the UN isn’t blameless, but the SC countries take a lot of the blame.

    You are correct, interpreted. I agree with you that the SC countries do shoulder a lot of the responsibility for things having gotten so out of control. I still cannot help but wonder if the UN, as a body, could have exerted more pressure, however. I feel bad for Dallaire — the Belgian government tried to make him into a scapegoat.

    Brandon, in regards to your question as to how I can support this kind of talk, the answer is quite simple.

    When we started this blog, we all agreed that we would each speak with our own voice, and would interfere as little as possible with each other’s postings or commentary. The last thing we wanted was to become a “me too” echo chamber, and I went into this with the full realization that I would often disagree with my co-bloggers, as they would with me, I’m certain.

    There have been occasions, when I feel that things have gone over the line, that I have spoken with my co-bloggers behind the scenes about various comments that have been made. However, while I am a mother, I am not THEIR mother, and do not want to be put in the position of being expected to dole out spankings when Sisyphus is naughty. So, if I do disagree with something that one of them (or one of you) says, and have the time and mental energy (both of which are sorely lacking these days) to say something, I will. If I haven’t, well…I’m certain that you can manage to disagree with them quite nicely on your own. 🙂

    Comment by Lyssie — July 28, 2007 @ 8:08 pm | Reply

  18. Yes, bring us this quote. And yes, it’s up to you to put up or shut up.

    In fact, don’t make another post here until you do. Otherwise, you’ll have proven yourself wrong again. You’ll have proven that you know nothing

    You DO have a cheek, don’t you? Ordering one of the proprietors of the blog to not post until he satisfies your demands. I have to laugh, thinking how well that sort of attitude would go over at…oh…99% of the other blogs out there.

    Comment by Lyssie — July 28, 2007 @ 8:10 pm | Reply

  19. Lyssie, this guy NEVER bakcs anything up he says. Whenever anybody askes him to prove ANYTHING, he disappears from that post altogether and starts a new one, more ridiculous than the last.

    Comment by Adam Nelson — July 28, 2007 @ 9:05 pm | Reply

  20. Brandon Expulsion,
    Idid see the movie. you tell me what was going on between that ape and that girl.

    Comment by Helen Bock — July 28, 2007 @ 9:16 pm | Reply

  21. Adam, you have absolutely no idea how much Sisyphus works. Some days I’m surprised he can stop by the blog at all. He really cares about his family and works more than one job to provide for them.

    He is an amazing and dedicated man and B4B is very lucky to have him. So back off the man a touch. And I’m sorry, Sisyphus, if I have given out too much personal information. But I’m sick of these baseless attacks on you by lazy liberal layabouts who have all the time in the world to complain about everything. It just steams me to no end.

    Adam: how many jobs do you work?

    Comment by Psycheout — July 28, 2007 @ 9:43 pm | Reply

  22. You think you’re somehow fixing things by mocking people who mock liberals?

    Comment by shokwave — July 28, 2007 @ 10:17 pm | Reply

  23. I’m not sure who that comment is directed towards, shokwave. Please clarify.

    Comment by Psycheout — July 28, 2007 @ 10:28 pm | Reply

  24. “Idid see the movie. you tell me what was going on between that ape and that girl.”

    Nothing sexual, I assure you. That’s pretty much a physical impossibility between a woman and an ape several stories high. Think about it.

    “You DO have a cheek, don’t you? Ordering one of the proprietors of the blog to not post until he satisfies your demands. I have to laugh, thinking how well that sort of attitude would go over at…oh…99% of the other blogs out there.”

    Well, sorry. I get a bit fed up with his outrageous and sensationalist claims, for which he offers no evidence. Also, thank you for responding to my other comment.

    “You think you’re somehow fixing things by mocking people who mock liberals?”
    “I’m not sure who that comment is directed towards, shokwave. Please clarify”

    I believe he is asserting that he thinks you are a parody, and are mocking yourselves (ie Brownback supporters).

    Comment by Brandon Explosion — July 28, 2007 @ 10:56 pm | Reply

  25. “So back off the man a touch.”

    I’d be more than glad (and I’m sure so would Adam) to cut him some slack if he’d back off a bit with the personal attacks. They’re uncalled for and are making discussion here get nasty.

    “Now let’s see one of these dishonest liars try to argue with me about it.”
    “What are you babbling about, treefrog?”
    “You are a complete pervert.”

    I don’t think it would be unreasonable to call a ‘truce’ of sorts with the name calling and personal attacks. Your thoughts?

    Comment by Brandon Explosion — July 28, 2007 @ 11:01 pm | Reply

  26. Someone just pushed me!

    Comment by The Envelope — July 28, 2007 @ 11:02 pm | Reply

  27. Sisyphus is a liar, pure and simple. He makes things up. King Kong never depicts the woman having sex with a 10-ton ape, and Origin of Species makes absolutely zero mention of people “fornicating” with monkeys (funny how he claims that, and yet men are NEVER mentioned in Origin of Species; we had to wait until Descent of Man for men to even enter the game).

    Aside from being a chronic liar, he missis no opportunity to blindly insult people who get in his way, often quite viciously and with insults that rarely make sense or are incredibly petty. I have no respect for his contributions on this blog.

    And Psycheout, for your example, I work two jobs: One as a Tim Hortons assistant manager, and the other as a driveway sealer for a landscaping company. And I’m also a full-time student. Not bad for a “lazy liberal layabout” (hey, have you been taking Sisyphus lessons?)

    Comment by Adam Nelson — July 28, 2007 @ 11:08 pm | Reply

  28. Brandon, an excellent idea. I would be the first to call off all personal attacks on this blog.

    Comment by Adam Nelson — July 28, 2007 @ 11:09 pm | Reply

  29. This is a parody site, right? I mean, you guys aren’t serious about any of this monkey-mating Brownback-for-prez stuff, are you? This is a joke, right? Please tell me it’s a joke.

    Comment by Vizar Grande — July 29, 2007 @ 12:15 am | Reply

  30. Brandy, did you ever see the 1976 version of King Kong? Kong peels Jessica Lange’s clothes off for Pete’s sake. And then it fades to black. I suppose they just cuddled. Right?

    See the picture in the update. It sure looks like Kong is getting frisky to me.

    Comment by Psycheout — July 29, 2007 @ 12:26 am | Reply

  31. Rule 1: Sisyphus is awesome.
    Rule 2: If you disagree with Sisyphus, see rule 1.

    Clear?

    Comment by Psycheout — July 29, 2007 @ 12:28 am | Reply

  32. I work…as a driveway sealer for a landscaping company.

    Yo, Adam, kiss my asphalt! 😀

    Comment by Psycheout — July 29, 2007 @ 12:40 am | Reply

  33. Believe what ever you want on whether evolution really happened or not, that’s your business.

    But to CHEER for the continued suffering & reduction of ANY SPECIES – if you believe in creationism then God created them all, didn’t he? – is JUST PLAIN MORALLY WRONG!

    Comment by indyandy — July 29, 2007 @ 7:01 am | Reply

  34. And before you “respond” to my prior post, know this:

    I am not a member of PETA, I am not a vegitarian, I do not object to the use of animals in medical/pharmicological experiments if it is deemed that that is the best way to gather useful data, I am not some “tree-hugger” super-environmentalist.

    So don’t waste your breath trying to come back at me via any of those lines of reasoning.

    Comment by indyandy — July 29, 2007 @ 7:05 am | Reply

  35. Psycheout is developing a mean streak as of late. Poor guy discovered that he can’t win any actual arguments, so he just resorts to ad hominems. Well, I hope his insults make him feel better about himself, then they wouldn’t be a total waste of energy.

    Comment by Adam Nelson — July 29, 2007 @ 8:18 am | Reply

  36. Brownback’s gone apespit. Either someone went crazy at his staff or this guy is monkeying around. I’m sure the reason the media hasn’t gone bananas over this crazy blog, is that they are not sure it is connected to the Brownback campaign.
    So I’ll just pound my chest and holler disgruntled noises, at your ridiculousness.

    [Ed Note: No profanity, please.]

    Comment by Stancel Spencer — July 29, 2007 @ 11:03 am | Reply

  37. Thanks for adding the pic Psycheout. Now I understand.

    Comment by ChenZhen — July 29, 2007 @ 11:09 am | Reply

  38. Sisyphus rocks!

    Comment by Dadaclu — July 29, 2007 @ 11:54 am | Reply

  39. A picture is worth a thousand words, ChenZhen.

    Well said, Dadaclu!

    Comment by Psycheout — July 29, 2007 @ 12:22 pm | Reply

  40. I hope you guys don’t mind, but I put this thread up on digg.

    http://www.digg.com/political_opinion/Poachers_Kill_Endangered_Gorillas_In_Congo_Good

    Digg it!

    BTW- Psycheout, you know how to add the digg button to the post, right?

    Comment by ChenZhen — July 29, 2007 @ 12:31 pm | Reply

  41. I’d rather not go into my work schedule, Adam, but from what you’ve said it beats yours hands down. I say that without braggadocio or exaggeration, but I’d rather not delve into specifics. Take my word for it, or not. Frankly, I’m too tired to care, and if I sometimes cross the line with personal attacks it’s because I’m too tired to react to them without an undue amount of exacerbation. Right now, for example, I’ve just gotten off work. I worked for 2 days straight with no sleep and no rest longer than an hour at a time. I’m going to sleep for 3 hours, then go back to work. I complain about working on the Sabbath, but my employer does not listen. So, I figure I may as well post on the Sabbath, too. I’m already sinning…

    I did manage to find some fun Darwin quotes for you, though. It took me about four seconds to research, too:

    “At some future period… the civilized races of man will almost certainly exterminate and replace the savage races throughout the world. At the same time the anthropomorphous apes [negros] will no doubt be exterminated.

    “The break between man and his nearest allies will then be wider, for it will intervene between man (in a more civilized state, as we may hope, even than the Caucasian), and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as now between the negro or Australian and the gorilla.” Charles Darwin,
    The Descent of Man, 2nd edition, New York, A L. Burt Co., 1874, p. 178

    This is the man I’m supposed to bow and scrape to in matters of science. Color me extremely, extremely unimpressed.

    Comment by Sisyphus — July 29, 2007 @ 1:59 pm | Reply

  42. Yes, we know that Darwin was racist. Approximately 95% of everyone before about 1950 was racist (and that 95% is all that science needs). Also, there have been more and better scientists on evolution since Darwin.

    Still, you haven’t found any quotes saying that he said that liberals interbreed with apes.

    Comment by interpreted — July 29, 2007 @ 2:51 pm | Reply

  43. Here’s another interesting angle…

    If you don’t beleive in evolution, then you would think that it is impossible for new species to develop. If you take Genesis literally, then all the species that are on the planet today are the some ones that were there when the Earth was created. Over the years, species die off (like mammoths and dodo birds) while others are on the verge of extinction (like the aforementioned gorillas). The number would steadily dwindle down. So it makes me wonder why someone who is supposedly such a Biblical literalist would take some pleasure at the news that one on God’s creations is that much closer to being wiped out forever.

    Comment by ChenZhen — July 29, 2007 @ 4:25 pm | Reply

  44. “Brandy, did you ever see the 1976 version of King Kong? Kong peels Jessica Lange’s clothes off for Pete’s sake. And then it fades to black. I suppose they just cuddled. Right?”

    Sure. Pardon me for being crude, but that ape’s penis would be as big as a tree trunk. That ain’t happenin’.

    “Frankly, I’m too tired to care, and if I sometimes cross the line with personal attacks it’s because I’m too tired to react to them without an undue amount of exacerbation. Right now, for example, I’ve just gotten off work. I worked for 2 days straight with no sleep and no rest longer than an hour at a time.”

    I’m sorry about the strenuous work schedule, but perhaps instead of posting demeaning content because of exhaustion you’d be better off not saying anything (not meant to be taken as an insult). You’d be doing yourself a favor by getting some serious rest and coming back on later. Just a suggestion.

    Comment by Brandon Explosion — July 29, 2007 @ 7:57 pm | Reply

  45. i never really thought this site was satirical until now. i had heard people say that it was, especially after the whole “world is flat thing,” but now i’m convinced that it is. celebrating the deaths of endangered gorillas b/c humans link them to evolution? make your rants a little more believable, sisyphus.

    Comment by packerwatch — July 29, 2007 @ 8:03 pm | Reply

  46. “Still, you haven’t found any quotes saying that he said that liberals interbreed with apes.”

    I thought the quote I provided pretty strongly implied that…

    I’m sorry about the strenuous work schedule, but perhaps instead of posting demeaning content because of exhaustion you’d be better off not saying anything (not meant to be taken as an insult). You’d be doing yourself a favor by getting some serious rest and coming back on later. Just a suggestion.”

    Fair enough. But that’ll limit my role on this blog even further. Instead of two or three posts and a dozen comments a week, you’ll get maybe one post a month. Frankly, my commitment to the Brownback campaign is stronger than that, and I owe it to him to challenge readers and garner Brownbackers no matter how tired I may be. America deserves no less than President Brownback, Brandon.

    “i never really thought this site was satirical until now. i had heard people say that it was, especially after the whole “world is flat thing,” but now i’m convinced that it is. celebrating the deaths of endangered gorillas b/c humans link them to evolution? make your rants a little more believable, sisyphus.”

    I followed the link to your blog, and the first thing I saw were giant male posteriors. I think that pretty much tells me all I have to know about you, packerwatch. Thanks for traumatizing me, by the way. It’ll take hours of prayer to wipe that image from my mind.

    Comment by Sisyphus — July 30, 2007 @ 6:24 am | Reply

  47. Sisyphus, you STILL haven’t gotten a quote from Origin of Species that suggests men bred with apes. And, I’ll save you some time: you won’t. Men aren’t mentioned in Origin of Species. That’s what Descent of Man is for. Sorry, but there goes your point. Please stop lying in the future (Thou shalt not bear false witness).

    Comment by Adam Nelson — July 30, 2007 @ 8:31 am | Reply

  48. “One of the most remarkable features in our domesticated races is that we see in them adaptation, not indeed to the animal’s or plant’s own good, but to man’s use or fancy . . .” -“Origin of the Species,” page 93 (Penguin edition)

    Adam: Origin of the Species is pornography for the kind of men who, like you, are discussed in Descent of Man. He presents you with a cornucopia of creatures to titillate your bestial urges, then talks you up in “Descent of Man.”

    You’re a Godless pervert, Adam. You know it, and I know it, no matter what you say on this blog.

    Comment by Sisyphus — July 30, 2007 @ 10:27 am | Reply

  49. …and here we go again. Great job Sis.

    Comment by Brandon Explosion — July 30, 2007 @ 11:28 am | Reply

  50. I followed the link to your blog, and the first thing I saw were giant male posteriors. I think that pretty much tells me all I have to know about you, packerwatch. Thanks for traumatizing me, by the way. It’ll take hours of prayer to wipe that image from my mind.

    ROTFL!

    /Even better that this smackdown came at the expense of a cheesehead.

    Comment by ChenZhen — July 30, 2007 @ 11:45 am | Reply

  51. …so, Sisyphus, you try and rebut me by proving my point? Well, uh, thanks. I guess. That just goes to show how truly dense you are. You can’t even prove your own point without proving your opponents’. You are the biggest liar I have ever known.

    Comment by Adam Nelson — July 30, 2007 @ 2:57 pm | Reply

  52. Evolution is a hilarious lie which was thrown to mess with humanity. How can life begin without a Creator? How can anything can come into being by itself?

    Comment by factbook — July 31, 2007 @ 4:15 am | Reply

  53. “…so, Sisyphus, you try and rebut me by proving my point? Well, uh, thanks. I guess. That just goes to show how truly dense you are. You can’t even prove your own point without proving your opponents’. You are the biggest liar I have ever known.”

    This is a lie, and a slander. I refuted you, and this is the best retort you can come up with? Garbled ad hominems? Have you been drinking?

    I may have many faults, Adam, but at least I’m not Canadian.

    Comment by Sisyphus — July 31, 2007 @ 5:39 am | Reply

  54. Sorry Sisyphus, but almost every one of your claims about evolution or its active supporters was a lkie. Fornicating with monkeys? Lie. Vast unidentifiable conspiracy? Lie. Responsible for all sorts of atrocities? Lie. Lie, lie, lie. You’re in pretty deep, Sisyphus.

    Comment by Adam Nelson — July 31, 2007 @ 12:00 pm | Reply

  55. “Evolution is a hilarious lie which was thrown to mess with humanity. How can life begin without a Creator? How can anything can come into being by itself?”

    Then where did God come from?

    Comment by Curiouser and Curiouser — July 31, 2007 @ 2:01 pm | Reply

  56. “Sorry Sisyphus, but almost every one of your claims about evolution or its active supporters was a lkie. Fornicating with monkeys? Lie. Vast unidentifiable conspiracy? Lie. Responsible for all sorts of atrocities? Lie. Lie, lie, lie. You’re in pretty deep, Sisyphus.”

    I have my sins too, Adam, but at least I’m not Canadian.

    “Then where did God come from?”

    God didn’t come from anywhere. God IS. God is the Alpha and the Omega. God exists outside of your concepts of space and time and causation. God is “the Love that moves the Sun and other stars,” to paraphrase Dante.

    I mean, come on. Atheist or not, you should at least be familiar with the most basic concepts of a Deity by now. What gives?

    Comment by Sisyphus — July 31, 2007 @ 3:57 pm | Reply

  57. Evolution is a hilarious lie which was thrown to mess with humanity. How can life begin without a Creator? How can anything can come into being by itself?

    Well that’s a misconception. Evolution doesn’t attempt to explain the origin of the stars or planets, or even the origin of life on earth(the source of DNA itself still eludes scientists). It simply says that animals change over LONG periods of time through natural selection. God and the concept are not mutually exclusive. Not by a long shot.

    Comment by ChenZhen — July 31, 2007 @ 6:19 pm | Reply

  58. This blog is awesome. Sisyphus is either insane, or the most brilliant troll on the internet. Rock on Sisyphus; maybe you can roll this into an “Ed Anger” type opinion column in The Onion when Brownback’s campaign goes belly-up!

    Comment by Aagcobb — August 1, 2007 @ 7:26 am | Reply

  59. Dear Aagcobb,

    Sisyphus, along with Psycheout, Lyssie, and many of the regulars here, are the most devout Christians and Concervative Republicans I have ever had the pleasure to know. You should consider yourself blessed by the very hand of our Lord Jesus Christ to have stumbled onto this blessed blog. We are dedicated to seeing the only worthy presidential candidate, Sam Brownback, elected not only in 2008 but again in 2012.

    Comment by Mrs. T.D. Gaines-Crockett — August 1, 2007 @ 7:40 am | Reply

  60. Dear “Mrs. Gaines-Crockett”:

    Sisyphus is a genius; this is the most demented parody site mocking wingnut fundamentalism ever, even beating Landover Baptist Church! I suspect you and several of the other regulars are his sock puppets as you mock Brownback and fundyism. I wish Sisyphus could get a regular gig on “The Colbert Report” to express his opinions; it would be hilarious! Sisyphus, you have my everlasting admiration.

    Comment by Aagcobb — August 1, 2007 @ 7:55 am | Reply

  61. nicely put!

    Comment by narziss — August 1, 2007 @ 12:25 pm | Reply

  62. Aagcobb –

    Maybe you should buy a t-shirt?

    Comment by ChenZhen — August 1, 2007 @ 2:45 pm | Reply

  63. This site *has* to be a spoof. No sane person could read Sisyphus and want to vote for Brownback. It’s the most genius campaign ever designed to destroy a man’s political career. Keep it up!

    Comment by Steven — August 1, 2007 @ 3:30 pm | Reply

  64. That’s rather uncharitable, Steven. We’re not Senator Brownback’s offical campaign site, we’re just a group of devoted individuals. But we are all very committed to helping Sam Brownback get elected, as we strongly feel that he is the best candidate and the best hope for our country. To state that our efforts are actually hurting Senator Brownback is really very unkind of you.

    [Ed Note: Well said, Lyssie.]

    Comment by Lyssie — August 1, 2007 @ 3:34 pm | Reply

  65. “To state that our efforts are actually hurting Senator Brownback is really very unkind of you.”

    That’s not necessarily an insult. Trust me: if the opinions on this site went on mainstream media, Brownback support would be utterly destroyed.

    “I have my sins too, Adam, but at least I’m not Canadian.”

    Being born in Canada isn’t a sin. Willfully spreading disinformation is.

    “God exists outside of your concepts of space and time and causation.”

    A rather pathetic cop-out. Unless you can give convincing evidence, you’re SOL. You can’t hope to say that “Things can’t be created without a creator” and then say that the creator didn’t have a creator. That, my friend, creates an infinite regression, and is a fallacy.

    Sorry to say this, but Sisyphus is perhaps the single most destructive force to Brownback’s campaign.

    Comment by Adam Nelson — August 1, 2007 @ 5:38 pm | Reply

  66. “A rather pathetic cop-out. Unless you can give convincing evidence, you’re SOL. You can’t hope to say that “Things can’t be created without a creator” and then say that the creator didn’t have a creator. That, my friend, creates an infinite regression, and is a fallacy.”

    Thanks Adam. I was trying to figure out how to put it so well into words, but I just couldn’t get them down in a way that some people would understand.

    Sisyphus, either everything was created by something, or not everything was. If God falls into the realm of not-being-created-by-something-else, then why can’t the universe?

    And before you pounce on me and decry this as some whacked-out leftist stuff, I’m looking for your honest opinion, but also described. I want to try and understand your perspective.

    Comment by Curiouser and Curiouser — August 1, 2007 @ 5:52 pm | Reply

  67. That’s some wacked-out leftist stuff, Curiouser and Curiouser.

    Comment by Psycheout — August 1, 2007 @ 6:19 pm | Reply

  68. Adam Nelson:

    “Sorry to say this, but Sisyphus is perhaps the single most destructive force to Brownback’s campaign.”

    Isn’t that pretty obviously Sisyphus’ intent? I mean c’mon, a flat-earth creationist who’s psyched about the impending extinction of gorillas? If Sisyphus was for real, he’d make Fred Phelps seem like a sane voice of reason in comparison. This is a parody site, folks. I just wonder how many real fundies read this nonsense and agree with it. I suspect many of the fundie posters are sock puppets.

    Comment by Aagcobb — August 1, 2007 @ 9:57 pm | Reply

  69. Of the 10k or so comments here at B4B that I have read, Aagcobb, yours ranks up there as one of the stupidest. Congratulations!

    Comment by Psycheout — August 1, 2007 @ 10:40 pm | Reply

  70. This can’t be real can it?
    people really think this is true?
    I think even sam would look at this and wonder about people’s sanity.
    he’s for many things, but i doubt something this insane..for good or bad i’ve met him and he seems sane enough 🙂

    Comment by RevDG — August 2, 2007 @ 1:26 am | Reply

  71. 1/ You belive in God and the word of the bible.
    2/ God ordered Noah to make an ark.
    3/ Noah allowed evil Gorillas onto the Ark, do we assume this was to satiate Noahs desire for sex with gorillas?
    4/ Are you for real?

    Comment by daveross — August 2, 2007 @ 1:28 pm | Reply

  72. “Sisyphus, either everything was created by something, or not everything was. If God falls into the realm of not-being-created-by-something-else, then why can’t the universe?”

    Because God created it. Read the Bible, friend.

    “3/ Noah allowed evil Gorillas onto the Ark, do we assume this was to satiate Noahs desire for sex with gorillas?”

    Noah was a man, too, daveross. He was not without sin.

    Comment by Sisyphus — August 2, 2007 @ 6:01 pm | Reply

  73. “4/ Are you for real?”

    Yes.

    Comment by Sisyphus — August 2, 2007 @ 6:01 pm | Reply

  74. I think it’s ridiculous to say gorillas are at fault and hideous, awful creatures – I believe in God and I believe He created all of us………I am really curious as to your
    PROOF that people have sex with them and procreate. I want proof that aids was started by this. Though I am a Christian, I think you are just off track with some of these statements, and part of the cause that many people hate Christians. I read the Bible, I love Jesus, but all of this is too far fetched for me. PROOF PLEASE>

    Comment by Marsha J. O'Brien — August 3, 2007 @ 8:47 am | Reply

  75. ]]73.

    Dear sir,

    It is amazing, truly amazing. United Nations rejection; flat earth; perverse fornication with gorillas. You are by far one of the most impressive internet trolls I have ever come across. Falsities so elaborate they are worthy of being featured articles of Uncyclopedia.

    Even a post filed under “Democratic Idiocy” and an “abortion count”.

    Content worthy of being base to endless flamewars.

    CHEERS!

    Comment by Mr. Queasy — August 3, 2007 @ 9:28 am | Reply

  76. Proof is not something that is given by these people. To give such would ruin these people it would seem….or at least most of them.

    Comment by La Mona — August 3, 2007 @ 9:51 am | Reply

  77. Sisyphus-
    Brilliant. I notice you repeatedly insist that you are for real and completely sincere. Nice touch. I thought you were done posting but I am very glad to see you back. Over the years I’ve gotten very familiar with right wing christian ‘logic’ and ‘thinking’ and I can tell you that you’ve really nailed their patterns and somehow managed to find a way to actually exaggerate their already cartoonishly absurd worldview, which is no mean feat. Kudos. Good satire is hard to find. Thank you.
    Winston Delgado

    Comment by winstondelgado — August 3, 2007 @ 10:39 am | Reply

  78. Yeah, these guys are allergic to the concept of proof.

    Comment by AutoFire — August 3, 2007 @ 11:32 am | Reply

  79. This blog is not a spoof. Why do leftards keep accusing me of that?

    Comment by Sisyphus — August 4, 2007 @ 12:29 pm | Reply

  80. Sissyface-
    If this blog is not satirical, then you, sir, are evidence of some sort of miracle because I don’t know how someone without anything between their ears can operate a keyboard. I mean, it’s not like you would be the only or even the first person who is perfectly happy to utilize the tools of the modern world to decry the modern world-there’s plenty of foolishness of that sort out there-after all, the luddites have a website, so why not flat earthers, young earth creationists, and other medievalist morons? I admit that in my dealings with those blessed fundies who utterly lack a sense of irony, I have met people thicker than molasses in winter. I suppose there is a remote possibility that you are some sort of savant who is capable of writing succinctly yet also believing that the Earth is the center of the universe or that atoms have moral fiber; I have begun to hypothesize that many religious fundamentalists are autistic or simply people who have severe difficulties coping with anything that is not an either/or option. These are people who have a very hard time comprehending irony. So I suppose there’s a chance that you’re not joking, and if that is the case, then good luck, buddy.
    -Winston D

    Comment by winstondelgado — August 4, 2007 @ 2:19 pm | Reply

  81. Was there a point to that rant, Winnie D? Are you a rapper?

    Comment by Psycheout — August 4, 2007 @ 2:47 pm | Reply

  82. Suckout-
    The point is contained in the words (which each ‘word’ representing a different concept or idea that is modified by the ‘words’ that surround it-discerning the subtle meaning of each is a skill that we call ‘reading’), but your response is worth thousands of mine.
    -Winnie D

    Comment by winstondelgado — August 5, 2007 @ 12:07 pm | Reply

  83. “So I suppose there’s a chance that you’re not joking, and if that is the case, then good luck, buddy.
    -Winston D”

    Thanks! You too, friend!

    Comment by Sisyphus — August 5, 2007 @ 7:54 pm | Reply

  84. 🙂

    Comment by Sisyphus — August 5, 2007 @ 7:55 pm | Reply

  85. “Apes are just creatures twisted by Satan to mock Jesus by giving EVILolition credibility. Further more they are naturally lust crazed for human women. Since they are not natural creatures they should be exterminated forthwith as the tools of evil they are.”

    It’s “Evolution”, dumbass.

    Comment by Monotheism_sucks_wang — November 17, 2007 @ 12:05 pm | Reply

  86. WE DID NOT EVOLVE FROM APES. AND IF WE DID, THAT SHOULD BE NO REASON TO WIPE THEM OUT. We evolved from a common ancestor. Gorillas are part of God’s creation, and there should be no reason for us to kill them. You’re cruel. Very cruel.

    Comment by Bob — November 25, 2007 @ 12:35 pm | Reply

  87. […] This one is so nuts, I decided to follow the link to the original posting. Whoah, nellie! […]

    Pingback by Monkeys, faggots and quarks, oh, my! « Why, That’s Delightful! — January 14, 2008 @ 8:48 am | Reply

  88. Hey Syphilis, you are absolutely f***ing barking mad. you are so loopy/insane/babbling that i cant believe you’re true. God likes to pet dogs by the way, did you know that? No i’m joking because he didn’t exist. the bible by the way is not meant to be taken literally, it’s akin to an earlier aesop’s fables. but, in fairness, you are absolutely f***ing crackers. get out the pyjamas and take yourself down to the local wacko ward.

    Comment by conor — January 14, 2008 @ 9:34 am | Reply

  89. you people are f***ing retards. Really, you believe the apes are evil? That is unbelievably ridiculous.

    Comment by George of the Jungle — January 14, 2008 @ 12:07 pm | Reply

  90. And the mindless drivel continues, only for the purposes of brainwashing people so dense and close-minded that they can’t seem to think for themselves.

    I’m not a Godless Liberal (nay, I’m a Methodist), but I do have an open mind, and I can think for myself. ANd this most certainly qualifies as one of the most moronic things I’ve ever read in my life.

    Comment by Brandon Worf — January 14, 2008 @ 3:37 pm | Reply

  91. “Apes are just creatures twisted by Satan to mock Jesus by giving EVILolition credibility. Further more they are naturally lust crazed for human women. Since they are not natural creatures they should be exterminated forthwith as the tools of evil they are.”

    So what you’re saying is that all apes do is walk around trying to rape human women? I seriously doubt that has EVER happened.

    Comment by xloserxdrummerx — January 14, 2008 @ 4:59 pm | Reply

  92. Hahahahaha, this site has got to be one of the funniest things i’ve ever seen. I don’t understand where you guys get your logic for making up this retarded rubbish. I’m losing my faith in Christianity every day seeing the nutters and fanatics that actually believe this stuff. You fundamentalist Christians really deserve to be in a mental asylum because obviously you will never be able to function in society without

    Are you trying to ridicule Christianity? Because every time I see a site like this, Christianity becomes more and more like a joke to me. Religion fanatics are the deadliest and most dangerous thing in the world.

    Comment by Parker — January 14, 2008 @ 6:48 pm | Reply

  93. I cannot believe you wierdo’s. You must be insane, to believe what you are writing. If there is a god he would be ashamed of you for revelling in the death of his creation and slandering others. Shame on you for suggesting such slanderous things against fellow humans. Also for your information the whole King Kong film is just a film, you nutters. I myself don’t believe in god but if he were real then the God Jesus talked of in the bible does not support the practices you preach. You disgust me and my christian friends.
    Plus all of you are too freakin scared to show your true identities, wierdo’s.

    Comment by Gregory Blake — January 15, 2008 @ 2:39 am | Reply

  94. “So what you’re saying is that all apes do is walk around trying to rape human women? I seriously doubt that has EVER happened.”

    You’re a nitwit, then. It does happen. But more to the point, moonbat “scientists” like yourself fornicate with the monkeys, to further your Darwinist agenda. With the extinction of monkeys, you’ll soon be forced to sleep with human women again, fomenting Christian humanism whether you like it or not.

    “Are you trying to ridicule Christianity? Because every time I see a site like this, Christianity becomes more and more like a joke to me. Religion fanatics are the deadliest and most dangerous thing in the world.”

    What do you know, another Atheist troll. Go fornicate with a mountain gorilla if you like them so much, treefrog. You won’t have the chance to advance Darwinist lies with them for much longer.

    Humans did not come from monkeys, moonbats. Our ancestors did not sleep with them. Just because your grandparents may, or may not, have preferred human women, does not mean that everyone elses’ grandparents were deviants like yours.

    Comment by Sisyphus — January 15, 2008 @ 9:39 am | Reply

  95. “You’re a nitwit, then. It does happen. But more to the point, moonbat “scientists” like yourself fornicate with the monkeys, to further your Darwinist agenda.”
    Proof or GTFO

    Comment by Elephant Bones — January 15, 2008 @ 10:01 am | Reply

  96. The proof comes from the Darwinists’ own lips, EB. They say that our grandparents had sex with monkeys, which means we’re monkeys ourselves. It’s a disgusting, deviant heresy against True Science; it goes far to show the morals and proclivities of these self-styled “scientists” themselves.

    Burn in Hell, gorilla lovers! Burn in Hell!

    Comment by Sisyphus — January 15, 2008 @ 2:25 pm | Reply

  97. The concept of an omnipotent and omniscient god is almost as stupid as the concept of AIDS deriving from monkey sex. I don’t really care, I just wanted to offend some of the naive christians here.

    Comment by jesussucksass — January 15, 2008 @ 3:00 pm | Reply

  98. “The concept of an omnipotent and omniscient god is almost as stupid as the concept of AIDS deriving from monkey sex. I don’t really care, I just wanted to offend some of the naive christians here.”

    Oh, you probably think the CIA invented AIDS. You sure sound like that kind of idiot. Heathen secularist Islamist Darwinian Copernican.

    Comment by Sisyphus — January 15, 2008 @ 3:08 pm | Reply

  99. Hmmm, well since Truman established the CIA as a national security act designed to keep American soil safer for the benefit of it’s own citizens, I highly doubt the CIA invented AIDS. Weird that I ‘sound’ that way though.

    Comment by jesussucksass — January 15, 2008 @ 3:23 pm | Reply

  100. *its

    Comment by jesussucksass — January 15, 2008 @ 3:26 pm | Reply

  101. “Hmmm, well since Truman established the CIA as a national security act designed to keep American soil safer for the benefit of it’s own citizens, I highly doubt the CIA invented AIDS. Weird that I ’sound’ that way though.”

    I’ve only heard two explanations for AIDS:

    1) Someone in Africa had sex with an infected monkey.

    2) The CIA invented it to kill black people and homosexuals and other mostly-leftist groups.

    You deride the first option, so I assumed you were option #2. Or is there some other option out there I’m unfamiliar with?

    Comment by Sisyphus — January 15, 2008 @ 4:03 pm | Reply

  102. It came from monkeys, the sex was merely added to the story. It’s unclear how exactly it became active in humans, probably from contact with monkey blood or from eating infected monkey meat in Africa.

    Comment by jesussucksass — January 15, 2008 @ 5:21 pm | Reply

  103. It likely came from a monkey bite or the eating of monkey meat. Cases have appeared as early as the 50s, but the spread did not become as deadly until the 80s.

    “Heathen secularist Islamist Darwinian Copernican.”
    Heathen and Islamist can’t go together. Do you not even pay attention to what you’re writing? You sure sound like that kind of idiot.

    Comment by Elephant Bones — January 15, 2008 @ 6:41 pm | Reply

  104. The CIA also created crack, Sisyphus, and forced black folk to smoke it. LOL!

    Comment by Psycheout — January 15, 2008 @ 6:58 pm | Reply

  105. The only monkey, or should I say ape, here is Sisyphus, or should I say Syphilis! You are a nutter. plus christianically speaking ‘treefrogs’ are amphibians not mammals like apes! plus ‘moonbats’ are some fantasy creature created by this Syphilis who is trying obviously to play god on this little blogsite of his. God did say in the old testament ‘thou shalt not kill’ that includes animals boneweed. Plus if you get you facts straight you puny excuse for an STI Darwin didn’t believe we shagged monkeys he believed we were the superior strain of monkeys, that we had divinely evolved from apes. Therefore darwin left the possibility that GOD played a role in making us evolve, in choosing us to evolve. The trolls you speak of must live in your ‘fantasy’ garden of eden with the unicorns and monkey killing facists. Next you’ll be telling us you believe in the actual Satan.
    I guess some people really are nutters.

    Comment by Gregory Blake — January 16, 2008 @ 2:41 am | Reply

  106. “It came from monkeys, the sex was merely added to the story. It’s unclear how exactly it became active in humans, probably from contact with monkey blood or from eating infected monkey meat in Africa.”

    Nonsense. How often are people infected by saliva? It was the sex.

    “Heathen and Islamist can’t go together. Do you not even pay attention to what you’re writing? You sure sound like that kind of idiot.”

    Anyone who isn’t Christian (or Jewish) is a heathen. Muslims worship the Moon God, and the Kaaba is full of idols. Are you really too ignorant to know this?

    “plus christianically speaking ‘treefrogs’ are amphibians not mammals like apes!”

    I’m well aware of that, Gregory. It’s my special name for tree-hugging leftards like yourself.

    “God did say in the old testament ‘thou shalt not kill’ that includes animals boneweed.”

    LOL. Sure, God was a vegetarian.

    “Plus if you get you facts straight you puny excuse for an STI Darwin didn’t believe we shagged monkeys he believed we were the superior strain of monkeys, that we had divinely evolved from apes.”

    In other words, that we copulated with the best monkeys we could find. Darwin was a deviant pervert, and he’s earned his place in Hell.

    “Next you’ll be telling us you believe in the actual Satan.”

    I most certainly do, Atheist.

    Comment by Sisyphus — January 16, 2008 @ 8:36 am | Reply

  107. tree-hugging leftards,,, that’s a cute statement coming from an oil-hugging Bushite. Or shoul I say Bushtard, Browntard, huckatard. Any old tard, you’re still a retard.

    Comment by Arn — January 16, 2008 @ 9:15 am | Reply

  108. “How often are people infected by saliva?”
    Maybe when they get bitten?

    Comment by Elephant Bones — January 16, 2008 @ 9:23 am | Reply

  109. It’s got to be a joke. This entire blog *has* to be a joke. Real people can’t be this mind-numbingly ignorant, can they?

    Comment by Aghast — January 16, 2008 @ 2:58 pm | Reply

  110. “It’s got to be a joke. This entire blog *has* to be a joke. Real people can’t be this mind-numbingly ignorant, can they?”

    This isn’t a joke, Aghast.

    Comment by Sisyphus — January 16, 2008 @ 4:20 pm | Reply

  111. “Real people can’t be this mind-numbingly ignorant, can they?”
    Never underestimate the sheer capacity for human stupidity. You make something foolproof, and someone will find a better fool.

    Comment by Elephant Bones — January 16, 2008 @ 5:07 pm | Reply

  112. Then you, Sisyphus, are one of the saddest creatures on Earth. You have heard the Word of God and understood none of it.

    Comment by Aghast — January 16, 2008 @ 6:10 pm | Reply

  113. Can you all not see that this Syphilis feller is trying to play god on his own little website, dictating whether on not things should live or die, destroying the arguments of others with slander. This guy is what religion is about and sadly also the type of person who causes religious hatred and war. Jesus was against this type of hatred and slander in ‘God’s’ world, he was also against the horrible message that this guy is trying to spread. Plus this guy’s arhument that saliva cannot spread disease etc. If he believes so much in the myth he is trying to create about the ‘story’ of king kong, then surely he must believe in things like the rage virus on Resident evil being spread by monkeys. It is destroyers of nature and slanderers of those who are dead who will be judged by god, for they are the lowest form of mankind.

    Comment by Gregory Blake — January 17, 2008 @ 2:26 am | Reply

  114. Sisyphus, would you like a banana?

    Comment by Kim — January 17, 2008 @ 7:40 am | Reply

  115. “Then you, Sisyphus, are one of the saddest creatures on Earth. You have heard the Word of God and understood none of it.”

    Whatever, treefrog.

    “Plus this guy’s arhument that saliva cannot spread disease etc. If he believes so much in the myth he is trying to create about the ’story’ of king kong, then surely he must believe in things like the rage virus on Resident evil being spread by monkeys. It is destroyers of nature and slanderers of those who are dead who will be judged by god, for they are the lowest form of mankind.”

    A movie is a little bit different from the Word of God, the Holy Scripture, now isn’t it?

    “Sisyphus, would you like a banana?”

    No thank you.

    Comment by Sisyphus — January 18, 2008 @ 11:16 am | Reply

  116. “A movie is a little bit different from the Word of God, the Holy Scripture, now isn’t it?”
    Resident Evil is primarily a video game. The movie was terrible.

    Comment by Elephant Bones — January 18, 2008 @ 12:12 pm | Reply

  117. I think we should shoot every ape in the head. Any human who kisses apes, too. Kill them all. Expiate this sin from the people.

    Comment by Marcia P. — January 19, 2008 @ 1:28 pm | Reply

  118. “I think we should shoot every ape in the head. Any human who kisses apes, too. Kill them all. Expiate this sin from the people.”
    While you’re at it, why not kill anyone who’s kissed or hugged their family pet? It couldn’t possibly be just affection; it MUST be sinful lust.

    Comment by Elephant Bones — January 19, 2008 @ 2:03 pm | Reply

  119. I think we should shoot every ape in the head. Any human who kisses apes, too. Kill them all. Expiate this sin from the people.

    marcia, you meen the niggirs to, rite? i to, wnat them ded.

    Comment by wpower — January 19, 2008 @ 7:40 pm | Reply

  120. This is awful. How many people’s feeling must be hurt before you stop and think a while?
    Have you never heard of the word ‘maybe’. Everything is a theory. Nothing in the universe can be proven. God cannot even supply any proof through faith.
    A real Christian would never be this concerned with the evil in people on this side of life. They just would not say a word and leave them to hell, or whatever.

    Comment by Dinah — January 19, 2008 @ 8:05 pm | Reply

  121. “While you’re at it, why not kill anyone who’s kissed or hugged their family pet? It couldn’t possibly be just affection; it MUST be sinful lust.”

    No one’s claiming we descended from poodles, EB. Big difference. Obviously, scientists are fornicating with apes- otherwise, where would they get such ideas?

    “marcia, you meen the n****rs to, rite? i to, wnat them ded.”

    Watch it, Mister. We don’t stand for that kind of talk around here.

    “A real Christian would never be this concerned with the evil in people on this side of life. They just would not say a word and leave them to hell, or whatever.”

    You’ve met some pretty sorry excuses for Christians then, I’m afraid.

    Comment by Sisyphus — January 19, 2008 @ 8:46 pm | Reply

  122. “Obviously, scientists are fornicating with apes- otherwise, where would they get such ideas?”
    Maybe their superior intelligence that leaves you green with envy?

    Comment by Elephant Bones — January 19, 2008 @ 11:55 pm | Reply

  123. wpower just proves the fact that all Leftists are, at heart, racists. He just hasn’t caught on to their newest ploy (labeling them as ‘victims’ so they have an excuse to steal our tax dollars) and instead adheres to a more primitive Leftism, Nazism.

    Comment by Bob_Corker — January 20, 2008 @ 11:51 pm | Reply

  124. what is all this [poopie] about leftists? there’s nothing wrong with people who support socialism, in my opinion jesus was a socialist, I mean you didn’t get jesus saying “no more imigrants, let’s privatise education and the church” plus the theory of evolution is just a theory, not a fact or a practise, just as the creation theory is just a theory. At the end of the day it doesn’t matter because we’ll all end up dead and it won’t matter where we go after that, because we’ll only know the truth then. People who claim that scientists sleep with monkeys are nutters, and it is probably those people who lust after animals not the people they slander against.

    Comment by Gregory Blake — January 21, 2008 @ 2:40 am | Reply

  125. “wpower just proves the fact that all Leftists are, at heart, racists.”
    Way to assume he’s on our side. Stop feeding the trolls, Bob.

    Comment by Elephant Bones — January 21, 2008 @ 2:54 am | Reply

  126. hey sysphius, if we who disagree with you are wrong in the eyes of god, and if darwin was wrong, they why didn’t your god strike him down, why doesn’t your god strike us down? Darwin lived well into his 80’s wich was quite old in the 1800’s. I think we should do a test, oh wait a minute, thou shalt not test thy god! damn, ah well, he ain’t no god of mine. I’ll give your god three days to strike me down, if he does you win.

    Comment by Gregory Blake — January 22, 2008 @ 2:36 am | Reply

  127. this is so stupid, i dont even have words for this.

    Comment by jjjjjj — January 22, 2008 @ 4:18 pm | Reply

  128. Wow thanks, this explains George Bush!

    Comment by dan dare — January 24, 2008 @ 7:23 am | Reply

  129. Your a freakin idiot. No body has fornification with gorillas. But you know what? its people like you who don’t act your species that brings the implications that we might be decendance from apes into view. Quit being stupid

    Comment by nunya — January 24, 2008 @ 4:47 pm | Reply

  130. “hey sysphius, if we who disagree with you are wrong in the eyes of god, and if darwin was wrong, they why didn’t your god strike him down, why doesn’t your god strike us down?”

    He did strike Darwin down. Your time will come, too, my friend, if you don’t repent while you still have time.

    “Darwin lived well into his 80’s wich was quite old in the 1800’s.”

    His sin needed time to season, that Satan might better savor it.

    “I think we should do a test, oh wait a minute, thou shalt not test thy god! damn, ah well, he ain’t no god of mine. I’ll give your god three days to strike me down, if he does you win.”

    I haven’t heard back from you in a while, so I can safely assume that this happened. Or, that you’ve lost interest and left. Either way, no sweat off my back.

    “this is so stupid, i dont even have words for this.”

    I know. He’s a complete moron.

    “Wow thanks, this explains George Bush!”

    I’m sorry. I don’t follow.

    “Your a freakin idiot. No body has fornification with gorillas.”

    Where do you think AIDS came from?

    “But you know what? its people like you who don’t act your species that brings the implications that we might be decendance from apes into view. Quit being stupid”

    So you admit you’re not human. How does it feel to be a subhuman hybrid of Man and Primate? It certainly explains your lack of reasoning abilities, if nothing else.

    Comment by Sisyphus — January 25, 2008 @ 2:02 pm | Reply

  131. sorry I didn’t reply, i forgot about your moronic site. Yes people I am alive and well. Syphilis your god sucks, my god kicks your god’s ass, so there, ps Darwin rules

    Comment by Gregory Blake — January 28, 2008 @ 2:37 am | Reply

  132. “His sin needed time to season, that Satan might better savor it.”

    Comment by Sissypussy

    Seasoned sin, now there’s whole new rant for ya, let’s have a post on seasoned sinners. 😀

    Comment by Arn — January 28, 2008 @ 12:37 pm | Reply

  133. “His sin needed time to season, that Satan might better savor it.”
    Since when is sin a spice? besides a spice of life?

    Comment by Elephant Bones — January 28, 2008 @ 3:09 pm | Reply

  134. HOW does sin season?

    Comment by Dinah — January 28, 2008 @ 4:38 pm | Reply

  135. Does sin have a sharp smell, like pepper, or is it a strong, lasting smell, like rosemary? Should one baste in sin, or should one sprinkle it on top for immediate flavor?

    Comment by Elephant Bones — January 28, 2008 @ 7:19 pm | Reply

  136. Ha Ha, I get it now….this whole blog is just a joke to see how outlandish people can be and how others react to the stupidity being written. Right? Right? Please tell me all of you have this private joke going. Please……Because if it’s not a joke, then there is no hope for the human race….There is no way that any sane person would actually believe what was written about apes and humans. Maybe thats it, the person writing the blog is insane and an inmate somewhere getting treatment and this is the therapy. His “little green alien” friends told him to write it…… 😮

    Comment by Allison — January 30, 2008 @ 1:28 am | Reply

  137. I dunno, I always thought sin was sweet not savoury, we should get satan’s opinions on this. Just a minute I’ll go get his home number!

    Comment by Gregory Blake — January 30, 2008 @ 2:37 am | Reply

  138. Hope he can recommend some recipes that require sin. I’m always looking for new cooking ideas!

    Comment by Elephant Bones — January 30, 2008 @ 9:16 am | Reply

  139. “Does sin have a sharp smell, like pepper, or is it a strong, lasting smell, like rosemary? Should one baste in sin, or should one sprinkle it on top for immediate flavor?”

    Ask the Devil when he eats your soul, moonbat.

    Comment by Sisyphus — January 30, 2008 @ 10:56 am | Reply

  140. Yum! Deeelicious.

    Comment by Dinah — January 30, 2008 @ 11:32 am | Reply

  141. If you sin, and you are proud of your sin, you become a demon on Earth. The world is currently being controlled by these people. Satan shall destroy Earth by the 6th of June, this year.

    Comment by God — January 30, 2008 @ 11:37 am | Reply

  142. “by the 6th of June, this year.”
    So if the world is on a time limit, I should sin as much as possible?

    Comment by Elephant Bones — January 30, 2008 @ 12:21 pm | Reply

  143. I’m totally poe, dude.

    Comment by God — January 30, 2008 @ 12:44 pm | Reply

  144. apes are interesting, but why do people say that humans are related to apes. i dont know about others but i dont look like an ape;;;

    Comment by micheala — January 30, 2008 @ 3:13 pm | Reply

  145. Yes, we all do. Genetically and physically, to argue with that is to argue with reality. Unless you’re poe too, you do sound like you could be.

    Comment by God — January 30, 2008 @ 10:59 pm | Reply

  146. I thought the devil tortured souls not ate them, you silly billy siphilis your thinking about the souleaters of Evo 5 you know that evolutionary planet, the one that’s totally unlike ours.

    Comment by Gregory Blake — January 31, 2008 @ 2:28 am | Reply

  147. “If you sin, and you are proud of your sin, you become a demon on Earth.”

    No, if you sin, and you are proud of your sin, you become Allspice.

    Comment by FadedRose — January 31, 2008 @ 4:52 pm | Reply

  148. …Allspice? Dunno what that is. And to reiterate, that was a Poe (parody) statement. I’m making fun of fundamentalists.
    If you like to too, come to http://fstdt.com/default.aspx !
    It’s “Fundies say the darndest things”.

    Comment by God — January 31, 2008 @ 5:44 pm | Reply

  149. ahh, did you miss the whole spicy sin conversation above? To Satan sin is savory, so I guess every type of sin is a different seasoning, the sin of pride would almost definately be Allspice.

    Comment by Arn — January 31, 2008 @ 6:27 pm | Reply

  150. “I thought the devil tortured souls not ate them, you silly billy siphilis your thinking about the souleaters of Evo 5 you know that evolutionary planet, the one that’s totally unlike ours.”

    What’s Evo 5? What are you talking about?

    The Devil eats souls, but at the Final Judgment your body will be resurrected, you will be judged a sinner, and you will be bodily cast into a lake of fire alongside Satan, whose only eternal consolation will be eating your body and your soul. Forever.

    Sin is the spice of life to Satan. It’s what he yearns for like a chocoholic craves Hershey’s. And like that chocoholic, his craving is his downfall.

    Comment by Sisyphus — January 31, 2008 @ 6:35 pm | Reply

  151. I think Sisyphus may not like sin on his steak. Oh well, I guess some people just don’t like certain spices.

    Comment by Elephant Bones — January 31, 2008 @ 6:59 pm | Reply

  152. I only use A1 on my steak, EB. I don’t sin on it, like you deviants apparently do. Some of you people don’t even eat meat. You’re vegans, and you torture the hard-working slaughter house employees instead of stupid cows and chickens.

    Comment by Sisyphus — January 31, 2008 @ 7:02 pm | Reply

  153. This IS satire, isn’t it?

    Comment by Ho Hum — February 5, 2008 @ 7:26 pm | Reply

  154. hi Sisyphus.
    i found this blog after searching for some advice. and I must say i has answered a few questions.
    It regards my husband, whom I love dearly. in fact we have a very strong bond, despite the fact that he rejects the bible. (says its weak to beleive something just because its old. neglecting the fact that age adds truth)
    My husband works for a small research lab in Tewkesbury, where he studies micro organisms trying to invoke genetic malformations (i have tried to tell him he should not play the role of god, but I like to think of myself as being quite tolerant to his personal beleifs). Anyway, about two weeks ago I came home to an empty house after work (I was expecting him to be waiting for me). I called his mobile phone, no answer, so I figured I should pretty much just wait for him as he occasionally comes home late anyhow.
    I was doing a bit of cleaning in our bedroom when I found that not only did he have a copy of every one of the planet of the apes films, he also had King Kong (two versions I beleive).
    I don’t know what I should do. we have young kids, and if what you are suggesting is true, should I leave him before his godless sin is thrusted upon them. (or heavens forbid- into them)
    Marianne Howlett

    Comment by m howlett — February 6, 2008 @ 7:24 pm | Reply

  155. Let me explain AIDS to everyone:

    HIV (the virus that causes AIDS) began as a virus found in monkeys and chimpanzees in Africa. In the monkeys/chipms, it was non-deadly and found in completely healthy monkeys. It did NOT transfer to humans through monkey bites – HIV is not found in saliva. However, it is somewhat common for people in Africa to eat monkeys and chimpanzees, and HIV is easily transfered through blood. Since humans are so closely related to primates, the virus was able to “jump” species and mutate into the deadly virus we know today.

    Let me know if you have questions or need clarification on anything here. By the way, I am a scientist, and no, I don’t fornicate with gorillas (an idea that most scientists would find quite humerous!). This idea is a misinterpretation of the theory of evolution. Reproduction with a gorilla would simply not work – it could not possibly produce offspring, as our genetic material is too different. Not to mention, I honestly don’t think a gorilla would go for it!

    Comment by dazzle023 — February 7, 2008 @ 5:53 am | Reply

  156. The moderator of this site has been blocking the ip. addresses of everyone who is against him with a relevant argument against his twisted views. I smell cowardice. And tewkesbury lady, your a moron, if you believe any of this stuff then I do believe we have de-evolution on our hands. Thanks science guy for you help, you are a dude.

    Comment by Sandy Shaw — February 7, 2008 @ 5:27 pm | Reply

  157. “This IS satire, isn’t it?”

    No.

    “I was doing a bit of cleaning in our bedroom when I found that not only did he have a copy of every one of the planet of the apes films, he also had King Kong (two versions I beleive).
    I don’t know what I should do. we have young kids, and if what you are suggesting is true, should I leave him before his godless sin is thrusted upon them. (or heavens forbid- into them)”

    I think you should take your children, and leave. Get out of there. It’s better for your children to be raised by you, alone, than that they face brainwashing by an acolyte of Beelzebub.

    I will pray for you, Marianne. You may have sinned in marrying a Limey Welshman (Tewkesbury?) who kills babies for a living and fondles apes for a hobby, but you seem to have gone with God now. God will provide for you and your children. Have faith in Him, and in His words and His judgments. His will be done, not thine.

    “HIV (the virus that causes AIDS) began as a virus found in monkeys and chimpanzees in Africa. In the monkeys/chipms, it was non-deadly and found in completely healthy monkeys. It did NOT transfer to humans through monkey bites – HIV is not found in saliva. However, it is somewhat common for people in Africa to eat monkeys and chimpanzees, and HIV is easily transfered through blood. Since humans are so closely related to primates, the virus was able to “jump” species and mutate into the deadly virus we know today.”

    Yes. AIDS jumps around a lot. It’s almost exactly like a Mexican jumping bean, or a shark with a pogo stick. Thanks.

    THESE are the science loons who want to use our schools as a forum to teach our children monkey fornication and Copernicanism in lieu of Truth.

    “Let me know if you have questions or need clarification on anything here. By the way, I am a scientist, and no, I don’t fornicate with gorillas (an idea that most scientists would find quite humerous!).”

    Sure, you don’t. I wasn’t expecting any honesty on the subject, but I’ve brought it to light in spite of you people.

    “Reproduction with a gorilla would simply not work – it could not possibly produce offspring, as our genetic material is too different. Not to mention, I honestly don’t think a gorilla would go for it!”

    So you admit Darwin was wrong, then!

    “The moderator of this site has been blocking the ip. addresses of everyone who is against him with a relevant argument against his twisted views. I smell cowardice. And tewkesbury lady, your a moron, if you believe any of this stuff then I do believe we have de-evolution on our hands. Thanks science guy for you help, you are a dude.”

    Spammers like Moxom are banned. Moonbats are not banned per se, only when they spam. It’s a very simple rule- if Kos wouldn’t allow it on his deviant site, why should we allow it on a site devoted to Jesus?

    Comment by Sisyphus — February 8, 2008 @ 1:05 pm | Reply

  158. So you admit Darwin was wrong, then!

    Fornication with apes =/= evolution. We share a common ancestor, which splintered off into the apes we see today, the Neanderthal(which we wiped out), and us.

    Don’t need to study the bones for long before you realize how similar they get to be.

    How is logical evolution somehow less valid than SHE WAS MADE FROM A SINGLE RIB?

    Comment by Dio Brando — February 8, 2008 @ 1:18 pm | Reply

  159. basically what sisyphus is saying is that things that are scientifically proven such as Copernicus’ theories are wrong because a book which is not meant to be fundamentally quoted or used says so. also evolution happens when a species makes an adaption to its surroundings which gives the species an advantage ie. chameleons have camouflage. i am not an atheist i am one of the people who think god could have been the catalyst in the big bang theory. do not reply to this with false assumtions of my race or religeon

    Comment by dowg — April 4, 2008 @ 5:10 pm | Reply

  160. Dear Sisyphus, as the legend goes with your name, you may be punished for your trickery of trying to fool people that humans fornicated with gorillas (like as if the gorillas would readily allow this) and the other half lies that you go about propagating. the HIV virus was transmitted not from gorillas, but by smaller apes like the chimps (like dazzle023 said). And just so that you know, the HIV virus isn’t transmitted only through sexual contact, it can be passed on through blood too. So in all probability, when some hungry African tried to catch a chimp for meat, it scratched him and later it’s blood came in contact with the open wound and that’s how the virus first entered humans. And who the heck gave you the right to ask Marianne Howlett to leave her husband? Agreed, she asked for your opinion, but decency would have demanded that you NOT give her your opinion in this matter. Why is it that you religious chaps always take the sayings of your religious books so literally, without ever asking for proof?After all, those books were written by men, who I can assure you were not any smarter that you (no offense meant). I’m still siding with the guys here who think this is some sort of joke to hurt that brownback character’s chances at the presidency (and it seems to have worked coz we never got to hear of any sam brownback on any news channels here in India while they were covering the presidential primaries)

    Comment by karthik shetty — April 16, 2008 @ 1:00 am | Reply

  161. *correction*: … half lies = half a dozen lies

    Comment by karthik shetty — April 16, 2008 @ 1:01 am | Reply

  162. BJ Tabor: you spelt evolution wrong

    Comment by n00b1na70r — April 22, 2008 @ 5:28 am | Reply

  163. Dear Sisyphus,

    You’re fucking retarded.

    Much Love,
    Sebine.

    Comment by Sebine — August 23, 2008 @ 12:43 pm | Reply

  164. how can you honestly believe that humans are not descended from apes, you all follow the Bible – a man-made book – so blindly that you have limited yourselves to a lower level of intelligence. I am thirteen, and frankly, I can understand evolutionary theory, why can’t you?

    Comment by athiest and proud — February 19, 2009 @ 2:50 am | Reply

  165. It is really worth reading from this sight just to get a laugh from your primative views. I HAVE JUST SPOTTED A POST SAYING THAT A WOMAN BEING CREATED FROM A SINGLE RIB WAS MORE VALID THAN EVOLUTION. Enough said.

    Comment by athiest and proud — February 19, 2009 @ 2:54 am | Reply

  166. Your primative notions of creationism are laughable.

    Comment by athiest and proud — February 19, 2009 @ 2:56 am | Reply

  167. i think this person syphilus is just joking to get a reaction from people, she cant seriously believe what she types

    Comment by john — June 8, 2010 @ 3:55 pm | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a reply to La Mona Cancel reply