Blogs 4 Brownback

July 16, 2007

Canada, Land of Militant Female Sodomy

Astute reader Johnny Rotten sent me this email:

Dear Mr. [Sisy] Phus,

I see that your recent post highlights French Harlots on their anniversary of Bastille (Jail break) day. While getting lunch it inspired me to remember to order my freedom fries correctly and to take a look for news of the continuing moral degradation occurring in foreign lands.

At least we have the benefit of a ocean separating us from these French influences. I would like to draw your attention to a much nearer and dearer problem. Breathing down our necks is the liberal haven of Canada, home to French Canadians amongst others and their unrestrained secular progressive ways. And there is very little that has been done to prevent them from slipping their vile practices here across the unsecured border.

I am sure you have heard of the scourge of militant lesbian gangs plaguing our fair cities this summer.

Even Bill O’Reilly has recently taken a stand against these GTO (Girls/gays Taking Over) gangs. It used to be that you could shield your children from such perversity, but today not even America’s favorite pastime , Baseball, is safe.

Could you imagine the horror of taking your family to the recent combined Gay day/ Hat day game in San Diego and discovering too late that you had
fallen into the crack of Sodom rather then settling in for the wholesome crack of rawhide on wood bats?

Some liberal denier gay activist groups, no doubt funded by the Radical Left’s powerful lobby machine, have tried to tell us to stick our heads in the sand and ignore the lesbian gangs running amuck in our midst. Preying upon, even raping our teenagers.

Close your ears to such claptrap. Upstanding citizens know better the truth.

The question we need to focus upon is where do our young women get such ideas to form these gangs? Well I have seen it with my own eyes and it is not pretty.

Let me testify that this lesbian brutality pales in comparison to what supposedly respectable Canadian Convenience Store Companies sanction daily in there advertisements. And targeted for ’squishy’ type drinks consumed by eager innocent children on every corner across the land.

If this example is not blasphemous enough, the brutal perversity of these militant lesbian harlots in this ad is not for the feint of heart.

It is truly frightening that lurking just across our northern border we have such naked anger directed at the entire male population . Hopefully when Senator Brownback is elected to high office, for our young women’s own good, he can chain the borders with steel and throw away the key. Putting a stop to the wide spread of such deviate ideas. And barring those who would promote lesbianism from penetrating our borders and corrupting our fairer sex. We must not allow the teeming hordes of illegal French Canadian aliens to import their foreign licentious profligate ways. The damage they have done to our country so far is enough.

Sincerely Yours,

John D. [Rotten]

Anything I could add to this astounding epistle would only be redundant. Mr. Rotten says it all. Militant lesbians have crushed freedom in Canada, and they’ve set their sites on America next. If Americans don’t do anything about it, we could all find our daughters forced to marry their sorority sisters at the gunpoints of the Homosexual Taliban.

213 Comments »

  1. Ignoring the total silliness in general:

    “Hopefully when Senator Brownback is elected to high office, for our young women’s own good, he can chain the borders with steel and throw away the key. Putting a stop to the wide spread of such deviate ideas.”

    Fine. Close the 49th. We don’t like Americans coming to our country anyway (which they do, overwhelmingly, during the summer). Oh yeah, but don’t forget that we are your largest trading partner, and we supply over 40 percent of your crude and pretroleum supplies. Closing off relations to Canada would cripple both countries economically, but I’m sure Brownback would restore order. And don’t even think of annexing us, as the entire rest of the world would love a good excuse to punch you in the nose.

    Come and get us🙂

    Comment by Adam Nelson — July 16, 2007 @ 7:50 am | Reply

  2. Ok, watching the Mac’s commercials, I will admit that the one with the “bleeding” tree man confused the hell out of me. However, you must realize that this is not new for Mac’s frozen slushee commercials. I remember when I was 17 they had a flavour called “Blooy zit” and the commercial for the product featured two (presumably) young teens in a bathroom. The boy had unusually bad acne, and the girl scratched one of his pimples, sending a streamer of blood running down his face. Then she promptly licked it. End of commercial. Everybody I knew was horribly disgusted by it, and I get sick to my stomach even thinking of it now.

    p.s. I have no idea what the “bloody zit” flavour was; I think everybody in my town was too grossed out by it to even try the stupid drink!

    Comment by Adam Nelson — July 16, 2007 @ 8:03 am | Reply

  3. I propose that we add Canada to the top of the list of places to nuke, right up there beside the Middle East. The Canadians have become almost as Godless as Iraq and Iran. I gave up praying for that country right after ruled in favor of the sodomites and so should you.

    Comment by Mrs. T.D. Gaines-Crockett — July 16, 2007 @ 8:17 am | Reply

  4. “I propose that we add Canada to the top of the list of places to nuke, right up there beside the Middle East. The Canadians have become almost as Godless as Iraq and Iran. I gave up praying for that country right after ruled in favor of the sodomites and so should you.”

    Nice try, Gaines-Crockett. Here’s a question for you: why is your name trademarked in the Licensing and terms of use section?

    Comment by Adam Nelson — July 16, 2007 @ 9:00 am | Reply

  5. My goodness, I no idea Canada was such a horrible place. Now I understand why Canadians are so evil they let poor Americans by cheep prescription drugs. My thanks to Johnny Rotten for showing us how bad it is.

    Comment by BJ Tabor — July 16, 2007 @ 9:02 am | Reply

  6. http://www.idrewthis.org/d/20061214.html

    Gaines-Crockett, anyone?

    Comment by Adam Nelson — July 16, 2007 @ 9:19 am | Reply

  7. http://www.idrewthis.org/d/20070116.html

    Another one for the B4B team.

    Comment by Adam Nelson — July 16, 2007 @ 9:23 am | Reply

  8. http://www.idrewthis.org/d/20070417.html

    Y’know, I’m beginning to like this strip!

    Comment by Adam Nelson — July 16, 2007 @ 9:30 am | Reply

  9. http://www.idrewthis.org/d/20070501.html

    Right on the button!

    Comment by Adam Nelson — July 16, 2007 @ 9:32 am | Reply

  10. http://www.idrewthis.org/d/20070517.html

    The war, anyone?

    Comment by Adam Nelson — July 16, 2007 @ 9:33 am | Reply

  11. If you have to know, Mr. Nosey, I will be writing another book shortly but this time not a childrens book. Honestly, I don’t want Joel Osteen or some other thief to come along and steal my ideas so my lawyer told me to protect myself in advance. There you have it.

    Comment by Mrs. T.D. Gaines-Crockett — July 16, 2007 @ 9:43 am | Reply

  12. Uh huh, so, what, you own the rights to your name? What about Lynelle Bryant? Is she writing a book too? Or what about the enlightening line that says that everything on the Blogs 4 Brownback site should be understood as political satire? Followed by the intellectual rights to all posts on the site?

    Hmm, right, you guys suuure are real.

    ——————–

    [Ed Note: I nominate you for biggest fool in the world. You’re confusing us with another site, moron. Either that or you’re wilfully lying your tail off because you’re a compulsive liar. Get your facts straight, dummy.]

    Comment by Adam Nelson — July 16, 2007 @ 10:17 am | Reply

  13. Again, Adam, everything has gone through my lawyer. We live in a world filled with Liberals who will pull anything from a grocery store slipdown to copyright infringement just to keep from working an honest job.

    Once my book comes out I am not going to waste one second of my time fighting over who owns what. Call it whatever you want to call it but the truth is that I do not make anything up nor do the people here. We speak the Biblical truth and if that offends your delicate senses then I suggest you find someone else to pester.

    Comment by Mrs. T.D. Gaines-Crockett — July 16, 2007 @ 10:31 am | Reply

  14. Adam Nelson,
    You are becoming even more annoying than La Mona.

    Comment by Maura Ghee — July 16, 2007 @ 10:35 am | Reply

  15. Amen to that, Maura Ghee. At least La Mona can fall back on her age in a defense. All Adam has is being a cursed foreigner with a skewed belief system.

    Comment by Mrs. T.D. Gaines-Crockett — July 16, 2007 @ 10:38 am | Reply

  16. Hey, Mrs. C, I wouldn’t be so quick to try and attack Canada. The U.S. has won every war it’s fought in except two. Canada supported the U.S. in every war but three, and the Civil War doesn’t count. The other two? Vietnam of course, which Canada stayed out of entirely, ended in quagmire. The War of 1812 was the other, and in that one the U.S. invaded Canada, and Canada seriously whupped us, going so far as to burn down the White House.

    The logical conclusion is that Canada is the world’s greatest military power, they just don’t make a big deal about it.

    Comment by Salmo — July 16, 2007 @ 11:27 am | Reply

  17. Certainly these are some of the most serious policy and national security issues of our time. As has been seen in the Shamnesty Immigration Bill debacle the electorate has spoken and demanded that our politicians pay attention to the threat slipping daily across our borders. Just another reason to reject Fipper RudyMcRomney and go with a candidate, like Seanator Brownback, who has always taken a strong stand at protecting us from foreign immigrant influence.

    It is quite understandable that good Americans like Mrs. Gaines-Crockett would feel so outraged as to call for unleashing the full power of our might and justice.

    For surely Canadians have missused their freedom. At what point does someone forfeit the very right to freedom we of the civilised democratic world fight and die for eveyday to perserve?

    But while I recoil in horror at what the Canadians, no doubt swayed by the French influences in their midst, do unabashed in their own lands, I hold onto the belief that we can take more moderate measures that will protect the purity of the fruit of our nation.

    I think the second part of Mr Sisy Phus’s initial response to me contains the germ of a national strategy. If the grassroot core of the conservative base can spread this far and wide, it just might catch.

    …”We’ve had to endure them for quite long enough. Quebec and Vermont can unite and secede, and we’ll wall ourselves off from them with mountains of garbage and electrified fences.

    When the lesbians are stranded behind a guarded wall of trash and frost, our nation will finally know peace.”

    Comment by Johnny D. Rotten — July 16, 2007 @ 12:13 pm | Reply

  18. I don’t think any of you have actually been to Canada. Also, you don’t need to block your borders: everyone crossing the borders comes IN to Canada, not OUT to the US. Nobody here wants to live in your dirty conflicted country.

    Also, you never answered my question, Gaines-Crockett. You say that everything on this website must be understood as political satire. Therefore, by your very legal definition, you are fakes. Or this is just another Scooter Libby case where you have no respect for the law.

    Comment by Adam Nelson — July 16, 2007 @ 12:27 pm | Reply

  19. “Uh huh, so, what, you own the rights to your name? What about Lynelle Bryant? Is she writing a book too? Or what about the enlightening line that says that everything on the Blogs 4 Brownback site should be understood as political satire? Followed by the intellectual rights to all posts on the site?”

    What are you talking about? Can I see a link?

    Comment by Sisyphus — July 16, 2007 @ 12:44 pm | Reply

  20. I’ve never written nor seen any authentic documentation stating that this site is satire. If there’s something like that out there, it’s going to make me very, very angry. This is NOT satire, and it is libelous to assert otherwise.

    Comment by Sisyphus — July 16, 2007 @ 12:45 pm | Reply

  21. “Therefore, by your very legal definition, you are fakes. Or this is just another Scooter Libby case where you have no respect for the law.”

    Now there is logic, we object to militant lesbians axe murdering men so in Adam’s mind we must be fakes. What passes as normal there in Canada Adam? Do they castrate you when you turn fourteen, I mean how does gender based homicide become normal or rational behavior?

    Comment by BJ Tabor — July 16, 2007 @ 1:11 pm | Reply

  22. Um, Adam? B4B and BfB are two entirely different sites. I have read BfB2008’s Legal Notice, which I think you are referring to, and have determined that you wouldn’t recognize a joke if it ran up to you, wearing an “I am a joke” t-shirt screaming “I am a joke” and kicked you really hard in the shins.

    I think you’re referring to (and completely misinterpreting) this:

    Many antogonists on the political Left would like to call it political satire so perhaps everything posted here [at Baptists for Brownback] should be understood in that context. Whatever it takes to keep their tiny brains from overloading.

    Apparently your reading comprehension knows no bounds. If thinking of BfB as “satire” in your poor widdle pea brain keeps it from overloading and exploding, you are free to do so. But what you seem to see as some kind of admission, is simply a tweaking of the nose of fools like you. Blind as a bat, and about half as smart.

    Besides, if you believe it says what you think it says and not what it actually says, go take it up with Baptists for Brownback and they’ll explain it to you very slowly using small easy words. Don’t waste our time with your paranoid rantings. Stay on topic, please.

    Comment by Psycheout — July 16, 2007 @ 1:29 pm | Reply

  23. Oh, Adam’s Canadian? I didn’t know that. Who cares what he thinks? What a waste of my time, responding to a perverted moose humper.

    Shouldn’t we just filter out Canadian and European IPs? Unless they want to contribute to Senator Brownback’s campaign, there’s really no point responding to them. They can’t vote at any rate. So who cares?

    Comment by Psycheout — July 16, 2007 @ 1:43 pm | Reply

  24. Ooh Psycheout, did I hit a nerve?

    “Now there is logic, we object to militant lesbians axe murdering men so in Adam’s mind we must be fakes. What passes as normal there in Canada Adam? Do they castrate you when you turn fourteen, I mean how does gender based homicide become normal or rational behavior?”

    BJ, seriously now. Militant lesbians axe-murdering men? Give me one instance where that’s happened in Canada by a cabal of admittedly militant lesbians. I mean honestly, do you really have such a Saturday-morning-cartoon outlook on life?

    Comment by Adam Nelson — July 16, 2007 @ 2:24 pm | Reply

  25. “BJ, seriously now. Militant lesbians axe-murdering men? Give me one instance where that’s happened in Canada by a cabal of admittedly militant lesbians.”

    How would I know, I am not Canadian and frankly I have no desire to know what horrible things go on in Canakastian. I was commenting on your attitude towards militant lesbian axe murdereress. You seem to think that people that abhor that kind of behavior have to be joking. Do you think axe murder is normal so there is no reason to be outraged by it?

    Comment by BJ Tabor — July 16, 2007 @ 2:35 pm | Reply

  26. BJ, seriously now. Militant lesbians axe-murdering men? Give me one instance where that’s happened in Canada by a cabal of admittedly militant lesbians.

    Mr Nelson,

    Did you even look at this.?

    Do you even read the posts before you start spewing your hate? Such typical leberal denier behavior. Luckily we can spot your type of foreign interlopers horning in on our political process.

    We do not need to find even a single example of an axe murdering Canadian lesbian. This is so much worse. It is an insidious French Canadian Corporate sanctioned enticement to the lesbian anti-god lifestyle on a mass scale. Inciting our young women to committ violent mass emasculation. It strikes at the very heart of the family and our efforts to prevent the circumvention of American values.

    Which you might understand if your kind had any of their own.

    Comment by Johnny D. Rotten — July 16, 2007 @ 3:24 pm | Reply

  27. “How would I know, I am not Canadian and frankly I have no desire to know what horrible things go on in Canakastian. I was commenting on your attitude towards militant lesbian axe murdereress. You seem to think that people that abhor that kind of behavior have to be joking. Do you think axe murder is normal so there is no reason to be outraged by it?”

    Exactly, you are not Canadian, and since you’ve never been, you should refrain from making judgement. Also, I’ve never heard of militant axe-murdering lesbians before. And since murders are rare things in a country with a crime rate as low as Canada, a single murder is all over national news.

    “Did you even look at this.?”

    Yes. I commented on it. Firt off, having never seen this commercial until now, I’ll point out that that isn’t a typical one. And second, it’s a commercial. It’s not some educational documentary shown to 4th graders. It’s meant to be funny. Only people that are too uptight to have senses of humour get offended at it. Also, if you don’t like it, don’t watch it.

    “Do you even read the posts before you start spewing your hate? Such typical leberal denier behavior. Luckily we can spot your type of foreign interlopers horning in on our political process.”

    And I suppose that you are the paragon of preparation then, having totally missed my first post. Also, “leberal” hate-spewing? What do you call Fred Phelps or any other WBC? [Ed Note: Liberal Democrats, fool. See below.] There sure as shootin’ isn’t a liberal analogue of the WBC. Actually, now that I mention it, what do you make of the WBC? They claim to be the harbingers of God’s word, but are incredibly anti-American and cheer the deaths of thousands of citizens and soldiers alike.

    Comment by Adam Nelson — July 16, 2007 @ 6:41 pm | Reply

  28. Those girls are even hotter than the Frenchie – you guys have the best soft core porn!

    Comment by Bob Baffet — July 16, 2007 @ 7:29 pm | Reply

  29. Dear Psycheout,

    I have tried explaining to Adam in terms he could understand to no avail that my lawyer is responsible for any legal notices to protect me against frivolous, Liberal lawsuits once my book comes out. I even called my nephew who is six and asked him for to give me some phrases that Adam might comprehend. Do you know what that boy did? Well, I will tell you, he laughed. A six-year-old child even finds Adam Nelson to be a fool worthy of ridicule.

    I refuse to validate my faith, beliefs, and my hard work to the likes of him or anyone else. I have a duty as a Christian woman to stand behind my word to God and that is exactly what I do. As I have said many times before, if someone does not agree with my religion or my politics then do not come to my blog and try to discredit it. End of discussion.

    God bless you and Sisyphus for putting up with that foolish Adam Nelson. You have a lot more patience than I do as his posting privileges at my blog were revoked long ago.

    Comment by Mrs. T.D. Gaines-Crockett — July 16, 2007 @ 7:30 pm | Reply

  30. Out of the mouths of babes come words of wisdom.

    Comment by Helen Bock — July 16, 2007 @ 7:47 pm | Reply

  31. Ah, I’m so loved!

    “I have tried explaining to Adam in terms he could understand to no avail that my lawyer is responsible for any legal notices to protect me against frivolous, Liberal lawsuits once my book comes out. I even called my nephew who is six and asked him for to give me some phrases that Adam might comprehend.”

    I have tried explaining to Crockett in terms she could understand to no avail that I am not Liberal and she is a blind ignorant fool. I even showed my friends and youth pastor at church her spill asking what I could say that she might comprehend. (Wow, amazing how that worked out.)

    “Oh, Adam’s Canadian? I didn’t know that. Who cares what he thinks? What a waste of my time, responding to a perverted moose humper.”

    Can’t tell ya how many times he mentioned it. It has better arguements than most here (no points to your side from an unbiased perspective.) And how would you know he’s a “perverted moose humper?” Are you assuming? I think you are! We’ve been down this road before…..

    “Adam Nelson,
    You are becoming even more annoying than La Mona.”

    That just means that he’s challenged you to a point where you can’t make a decent arguement in return. (The general name calling, false labels, and ignorance don’t make an arguement.) Glad to know I’ve made an impression.

    “Amen to that, Maura Ghee. At least La Mona can fall back on her age in a defense. All Adam has is being a cursed foreigner with a skewed belief system.”

    Age is irrelevant–we’ve done this before, remember? Try to remember. I don’t use my age as defense. You try to use it against me…but if you didn’t know that I was a teen we wouldn’t be having this conversation. You would still think I was an adult. (Have you thought about how different IQs function yet Crockett? I’ll go ahead and let you know that mine most likely exceeds yours. Can you add 2+2 from there?)

    “We live in a world filled with Liberals who will pull anything from a grocery store slipdown to copyright infringement just to keep from working an honest job.”

    Ah, more stereotypes and assumptions. We haven’t learned. How sad. Shall I repeat this one?

    “I propose that we add Canada to the top of the list of places to nuke, right up there beside the Middle East.”

    Yes Crockett, destroy our Economy…that’s exactly the kind of people I want in government! People like you ignorant to the effects of your blind desires. Right after our Economy out goes our country as Canada’s allies beat us in the face. And Crockett destroys the U.S.A. in less than a week! Go Crockett. I suggest a little education in the areas of GOVERNMENT POLITICS AND ECONOMICS!!!! I know, I’ve never said that before…do you see how we keep having the same problems? What a sad cycle for you. One day you’ll learn.

    Comment by La Mona — July 16, 2007 @ 8:06 pm | Reply

  32. One more try, T.D. G-d give me strength.

    Adam Nelson, I hate to break it to you, but Fred Phelps, the head of the WBC is one of yours. He has run as a Democrat five times in Kansas and supported Al Gore. There’s even a picture of the two of them together.

    Members of the Westboro Baptist Church helped run Gore’s campaign in Kansas. And Phelps’ son, Freddy Jr., hosted a Gore fundraiser in Topeka, which both al-Bore and Tipper attended. See photo.

    He’s also a big supporter of leftist hero Fidel Castro, the notorious Cuban dictator. He wrote a letter to leftist pal Saddam Hussein in 2003, praising him.

    Look it up. It’s all true.

    He’s one of yours. Face it. Accept it. And never speak that liberal’s name again.

    Comment by Psycheout — July 16, 2007 @ 8:12 pm | Reply

  33. Democrat? He was, yeah. Liberal? HAH! He’s a strict anti-freedom, anti-gay religious nut.

    Comment by Salmo — July 16, 2007 @ 9:37 pm | Reply

  34. Remember, Zell Miller is a Democrat. Is he a Liberal? Nope.

    Comment by Salmo — July 16, 2007 @ 9:38 pm | Reply

  35. …ignorance don’t make an arguement [sic]

    No argument there.

    I propose that we add Canada to the top of the list of places to nuke…

    Spud would like to point out at this time the absurdity of the notion of nuking Canada as it thereafter nixes fer America the option of invasion and occupation when Climate change makes Mexico basically unlivable and sends their entire population over the southern border all at once.

    Think ahead fer Pete’s sake.

    Spud thinks the argument so far has entirely avoided discussing the painfully obvious truth that the reason Canadian society has thus far allowed, indeed perhaps embraced, the existence of such a large number of militant lesbian gangs is the simple fact that despite being ruthlessly, violent thugettes they are kinda hot. Johnny D (R)’s recent fascination with the topic, like that of Bill O’ Reilly, simply reeks of pervy obsessive, prurient interest beyond simple politics.

    The original impetus for all these violent girl gangs is, of course, the Lizzies, from the 1979 circa film The Warriors. A movie based on a book by Sol Yurick. The book itself is loosely based the Anabasis by Xenophon, which tells the story of how The Ten Thousand, a Greek Mercenary Company, made it’s way home through Persian territory. Long story short they had a tough time.

    Does Spud digress? Maybe yes, Maybe no.

    Here’s a thought.

    Before planning any future bombings/ invasions perhaps it would be best if y’all finished what’s on yer plate at present. Get your Ten Thousand, or wotever the number is now, home, and then you can talk about future wars with a little more credibility.

    Be Well.

    Comment by dethspud — July 16, 2007 @ 10:00 pm | Reply

  36. I fell to my knees and thanked the manly God above for His wisdom in giving righteous men like Johnny Rotten the guts to speak the truth about the horrible fate that awaits our nation unless we take action right now!!! Thank God for brave men like Johnny Rotten.

    Comment by E. Taint — July 17, 2007 @ 12:26 am | Reply

  37. Carpetbaggers, carpet munchers, they’re all the same to me. I heard that Butterfly and Scarlett worked together to figure out how to put the harness on the mare. But I digress. Canada is cold because it is populated by militant femdom bedwetters. Johnny Rotten, I’m glad you are leading the charge.

    Comment by Fled — July 17, 2007 @ 6:56 am | Reply

  38. If Canada could isolate its loons behind an Arctic wall, I’d have no problem with Canada. Until then, it’s a bastion of treefroggery. What else can I say? They embolden the Vermonters and Seattleites and Maineiacs.

    Comment by Sisyphus — July 17, 2007 @ 10:18 am | Reply

  39. “I propose that we add Canada to the top of the list of places to nuke, right up there beside the Middle East. The Canadians have become almost as Godless as Iraq and Iran. I gave up praying for that country right after ruled in favor of the sodomites and so should you.” – Mrs. T.D. Gaines-Crockett

    What a joke! Thank you for not praying for me or the country I am proud to live in. We don’t need you. It’s people like you – Mrs. T.D. Gaines-Crockett – that are destroying this planet. BTW, I’m still laughing my ass off from reading some of your blog, also a joke. Thanks for making my day!

    Comment by Stephen Dyrgas — July 17, 2007 @ 10:43 am | Reply

  40. For those wlling to put their money where their mouths are:

    http://www.theinterviewwithgod.com/investors.html

    Comment by Fled — July 17, 2007 @ 11:53 am | Reply

  41. […] 17th, 2007 by Stephen Dyrgas I stumbled across this post today and felt compelled to share it here. Now I believe in freedom of speech and that people are […]

    Pingback by Some Americans Feel That Canada Should Nuked?!? « Dyrgas Gate — July 17, 2007 @ 11:57 am | Reply

  42. Comment by Fled — July 17, 2007 @ 1:14 pm | Reply

  43. Thanks for the pic, Fled. Now I have to go bathe.

    Comment by Sisyphus — July 17, 2007 @ 1:18 pm | Reply

  44. Typical American Hypocricy… if we were in a true “War on Terror” it would be you bible thumping retards that get’s nuked. Stay out of Canada, cuz believe me, you yanks pollute the plannet far more than we supposedly pollute your backward morals. Speaking of, have you guys put a stop to pedophaelia and incest in the southern states yet, or are you waiting for the literacy rate to exceed 5%?

    Comment by Curtis — July 17, 2007 @ 1:56 pm | Reply

  45. ” They embolden the Vermonters and Seattleites and Maineiacs.”

    Who?

    Gaines-Crockett, did I hurt your feelings or something? You’re spouting a lot of insult and hate my way. People only do that when they’ve been threatened greatly. Well, calm down. Canadians in fact want nothing to do with America, considering we all severely dislike the nation. And why so much chest-thumping about your faith? I never questioned it or anything. Why are you so frightened that you need to tell people what a soldier of God you are? Sounds to me like your faith is in fact wavering. Therefore, you have to shout it out to the world. If you were truly secure in your faith, you wouldn’t need to chest thump.

    And btw, I’m not sure how old La Mona is, but I’m 19.

    In conclusion: Gaines-Crockett, unless you can talk without insulting people like a cowardly 4th grade bully, you should just not talk. When you can approach things like an adult, then I happily welcome your contribution.

    Comment by Adam Nelson — July 17, 2007 @ 3:22 pm | Reply

  46. Gaines-Crockett, unless you can talk without insulting people like a cowardly 4th grade bully, you should just not talk. When you can approach things like an adult, then I happily welcome your contribution.

    Excuse me? Young man, you are hanging by a thread. You do not dictate who can and cannot speak around here. But we can.

    You cannot post, you can only comment. T.D. Gaines-Crockett has posting privileges here, graciously on loan from Baptists for Brownback. This means she also has access to the site’s options.

    Can you see where I’m going with this?

    She could easily put your IP, name and email address on the blacklist and nobody would notice. I certainly wouldn’t. For a few minutes I might wonder where you had gone, but you’d be quickly forgotten.

    You should be a little more respectful of your elders, Canadian boy.

    Comment by Psycheout — July 17, 2007 @ 3:47 pm | Reply

  47. Respectful to Gaines-Crockett? Who openly insults me and suggests that my country be destroyed by a nuclear bombardment? Well, maybe. I do forgive idiots quite easily.

    The point is this, Psycheout: you can’t intimidate me. Hanging by a thread? Give me a break, and stop being so ridiculously pompous for a minute. This is a free opinion forum, and I will give my opinion fully and without recourse. If you don’t like it, then don’t read it. And blocking my IP? Is that how you deal with people that you disagree with but you’re not smart enough to rebut properly? Well go ahead then, do your worst.

    And by the way, when I said “post”, I mistakenly meant comment on established posts.

    However, my comment still stands. If Gaines-Crockett wants to devolve to the level of a schoolyard bully, she should do it somewhere else.

    Comment by Adam Nelson — July 17, 2007 @ 3:59 pm | Reply

  48. Who is this Adam fairy? What a snotty little punk.

    Comment by JOE — July 17, 2007 @ 4:37 pm | Reply

  49. We haven’t heard from PG today. Could Adam Nelson be next?

    Comment by Psycheout — July 17, 2007 @ 4:56 pm | Reply

  50. Adam Nelson,

    Backwardly moral right wing religious fanatics whose righteousness makes al Qaeda fanatics look tame cannot devolve any further. they are already as low as the very bacteria that infect us all. You might as well try and stop the tide because talking to these small minded pricks is THE ultimate excercise in futility.

    However I do agree with your comments about their obvious insecurity. Most people that scream the faults of others are simply trying to cover their own. Maybe if Gaines-Crocket yells, pouts, and stomps her feet loud enough, we might believe that she’s as benevolent as she claims. It amazes how these nuts can condemn a lifestyle choice of a Nation that is not thiers with absolutely no facts to back it up. We’re the 2nd largest country in the world by size, and they still think that what happens in one part becomes the norm here.

    And if I ever heard an oxymoron, it would have to be “Biblical Truth”. Christians the world over are going to hell by violating the 10 commandments everyday they exist. The commandment “Thou shall have no other Gods before Me” is violated every time you worship Christ. A religion that supposedly preaches tolerance and love, yet they call for nuclear destruction of one of the most peaceful and tolerant nations in the world.

    And before ANY of you question my age, and citizenship, I will point out that I am 62 yrs old, and am a dual citizen. I’ve earned my right to speak my mind whether you like it or not. I fought for America during Vietnam. I am a republican / conservative for both countries, but even I can see they all have taken this too far and blown a very minor thing out of proportion.

    Comment by qaeria — July 17, 2007 @ 5:00 pm | Reply

  51. Lol Psycheout, what a tool.

    Comment by Adam Nelson — July 17, 2007 @ 6:02 pm | Reply

  52. Quaeria, I completely agree that trying to convert these fellas is beyond human capability, but that’s what separates them from me. I’m not here to convert them or make them think the way I do, but merely to have an interesting discourse. I value the way they feel as an expression of free mind, even if I think most of them are idiots, but I don’t want to change what they think. I’m just having fun.

    Comment by Adam Nelson — July 17, 2007 @ 6:18 pm | Reply

  53. And you’re also right about the second commandment being violated by worshipping Christ, but they adapted the Bible to account for that too: in the KJV, God is, for some reason, also Jesus! Problem solved!

    Comment by Adam Nelson — July 17, 2007 @ 6:19 pm | Reply

  54. I am not knockin their right to free speech, but I am trying to illustrate just how stupid some American beliefs can be. The rhetoric from these self proclaimed soldiers of God is almost like Hitlers philosophy of I’m white, so I got to be right attitude. if these psychos had it their way, the Holocaust would be a small footnote in the big book of mass human distruction by comparison.

    Furthermore, the KJV bible is not the only one. Each version is littered with the translators own bias and interpretation. One cannot proclaim himself the Son of God, and be god at the same time. All versions of the bible are open for interpretation only. This is how we have cults develop that believe pedophaelia is the true expression of God’s supposed love. Remember Waco? The Branch Davidians truly thought they were acting in the name of God, and Died for their beliefs. I doubt anyone would say they had it right. I would like these fanatics to recognize that they could be wrong as well about their own beliefs.

    Who knows… I could be wrong about mine. But since I do not believe in an all powerful god, I really could care less if I am. I live my life to what I know to be right.

    For the contributors here, I would suggest that you look to your own country as a source of your problems. Blaming Canada is starting to bore the world, and we are all still waiting for you to grow up.

    Comment by qaeria — July 17, 2007 @ 7:22 pm | Reply

  55. My final retort is direct from the bible…All versions. “Judge not… Lest ye be judged” If there is a god, it is up to it on judging people. live your life, I’ll live mine.

    Comment by qaeria — July 17, 2007 @ 7:30 pm | Reply

  56. Dear Americans,
    While I would imagine that a majority of you are decent well rounded people, you don’t matter. It’s the no minded, right wing, gods-dick-sucking, homophobic, washed up, impotent, probably gay themselves – politicians, who ruin your countries name. No where on earth is anyone more despised than you. Even more despised than the middle east. The violence and fear brought forth by your country, is worlds ahead of anyone I could ever imagine.

    I am a proud canadian, if you don’t like that, build a wall.

    Comment by MooseHumper — July 18, 2007 @ 5:43 am | Reply

  57. Wasn’t this subject already covered on South Park?🙂

    Comment by Tyler Durden — July 18, 2007 @ 7:38 am | Reply

  58. It was, and quite thoroughly too! I rather enjoy qaeria’s discourse, though.

    On your comment of the Son cannot also be God, they would just say something along the lines of “are you saying G-D can’t do something!? He’s AlL PoWeRfUl!!!!!111” h@x0rz Unfortunately for them they take ALL differences from their beliefs as challenges to their faith that must be ignored or destroyed at all costs… again, eerily paralleling Hitler.

    My main problem is their evangelism though. I am happy to live and let live, and I have no problem with them believing in their Southern Baptist ways, much as I think they’re incredibly distorted/retarded. But when they try and forcibly convert those who don’t agree with them, or shun those people, then I have a problem with them.

    Comment by Adam Nelson — July 18, 2007 @ 7:58 am | Reply

  59. My main problem is their evangelism though. I am happy to live and let live, and I have no problem with them believing in their Southern Baptist ways, much as I think they’re incredibly distorted/retarded. But when they try and forcibly convert those who don’t agree with them, or shun those people, then I have a problem with them.”

    I’m no Southern Baptist either, but at least they’re Christians. We Christians have a sacred duty to bring others into God’s love, as we ourselves were brought there. To do otherwise would be tantamount to watching a man roast alive in a car accident while doing nothing to help him. A decent man would do everything in his power to save that burning man. Even if he had to smash the man’s car and break his legs and jaw to get him out, he wouldn’t hesitate. So why should I?

    We’re here for your soul, Adam. We mean to save it. It’s for your own good, and you’ll thank us later.

    Comment by Sisyphus — July 18, 2007 @ 1:43 pm | Reply

  60. You are not called however to shove it down someone’s throat and verbally attempt to brutalize them to converting. It really doesn’t get you many points on the field…

    Comment by La Mona — July 18, 2007 @ 2:59 pm | Reply

  61. My downstairs neighbors are a married couple… OF WOMEN!

    And they’re the best neighbors I ever had. Quiet, polite, and sometimes they make us cookies.

    Comment by Salmo — July 18, 2007 @ 3:34 pm | Reply

  62. Sisyphus,

    Your comments about your sacred duty have resulted in more deaths throughout our history than both World Wars, all for the sake of converting the heathen masses. The first duty of any christian is to live life according to the bible. Ramming your beliefs down anyone’s throat is going to do nothing but cause a conflict.

    From my perspective, evangelistic christians are no better than radical Nazi’s. You both think that yours is the only true way of life, and will spill a lot of blood to make it so. I know many christians, and you are right… they are decent, hard working folk, however they firmly believe that God will make final judgement, and it is a sin to judge others. It’s always convenient that the bible can be twisted to fit anyone’s preconceptions, and is quite obvious here.

    Spare me and others with your tripe about saving souls. it is not your job to do it, and again, you violate the 10 commandments by carrying on your evangelism. I however, am quite content with the condition of my soul even though it does not fit with your ideal world.

    Comment by qaeria — July 18, 2007 @ 3:40 pm | Reply

  63. Also, I was raised as a conventional Baptist, and nowhere in my teachings was I told to bring people into God’s love. I had a duty to obey the Golden Rule, and the 10 commandments. I don’t want a jehova’s witness converting me, so why should I convert them. and I used to believe in 2 beings. I believed in God, the Creator of the Universe, and Jesus as his son who came to earth to be my saviour. To believe Jesus was in fact god felt like I violated the second commandment.

    When I turned 21, became an adult, and outgrew fairytales, I came to realize that there was something better out there. God is not a part of my life anymore, and to be perfectly honest, I have never felt better.

    Comment by qaeria — July 18, 2007 @ 3:48 pm | Reply

  64. and to clarify, it’s not your comments that have caused the bloodshed Sisyphus, rather the concept of that sacred duty you claim to have.

    Comment by qaeria — July 18, 2007 @ 5:08 pm | Reply

  65. Found on Wikipedia ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Missionary#Controversy)

    Controversy and Christian missionaries

    The Burning Cross is a polemical site that documents a different story about missionaries historically, especially Christian missionaries.

    The Christian missionary mindset is generally depicted as that of simple religious folk with a pure desire to peacefully spread their gospel and message of love. In reality, their methods of propagation are often anything but peaceful and usually leave behind a native population stripped of their culture and often decimated….

    In the words of one resident of Thailand, “They [Christian missionaries] seemed that they did not show any interest for our culture. Why? They are just eager to build big churches in every village. It seems that they are having two faces; under the title of help they suppress us. To the world, they gained their reputations as benefactors of disappearing tribes. They built their reputations on us for many years. The way they behaved with us seemed as if we did not know about god before they arrived here. Why do missionaries think they are the only ones who can perceive God?”

    In fact, most of the civilizations which were overrun by zealous Christians in their conversion fervor, were highly evolved in their moral standards, with complex social structures, high standards of cleanliness and hygiene, decorative art and evolved sciences, and content with their own religion. The arrival of Christianity actually caused these civilizations to move backwards. In this regard we need only look to Europe, for the Dark Ages of Europe is a time when the Church was in control. The Age of Enlightenment (Renaissance) began when the common people were freed from the tyranny of the Christian church….

    Christians have always portrayed non-Christian civilizations as backwards, underdeveloped, superstitious, and barbaric. What really underlies all of their criticism is that these cultures do not accept Jesus, the Bible and their western way of life. This is what, in the Christians’ opinion, deems these cultures as needing their help, when in fact their fervor to destroy any theistic conception other than Christianity or any temple other than a church shows that they are really the ones who are showing the qualities of barbarians.

    Today, many are uninformed and believe that mission excesses only took place in prior times and today’s preaching works are a ‘good thing.’ But as long as the basic premises and theology that underly all the abuses that took place in the past are not corrected, the result of mission activities will remain the same: Genocide and destruction of all that lies in its way, replacing it with the ‘superior religion and culture’ that most missionaries believe they are delivering

    Comment by qaeria — July 18, 2007 @ 5:25 pm | Reply

  66. Excerpt Comment from christianaggression.org:

    … Christians believe that they have been commanded by Christ to go and “save” (convert) the people of this world. This is also supposed to give them special merit when it comes to the day of final judgment. While there are many Christians who today do not believe in this exclusivity, there are a still large number of misguided Christians who still believe in the exclusivity of Christianity and the concept of saving souls. It is this misguided belief that breeds a hatred and intolerance for other religions. and from this hatred, these Christian Fundamentalists begin their aggression to convert. And often they will go to any means to convert even if it means violence…

    Comment by qaeria — July 18, 2007 @ 5:51 pm | Reply

  67. Qaeria, I agree with much of your material, but Sisyphus I have a question for you.

    You understand that it is your sacred duty to convert others, which is the best thing you could do for them. In other words, you’re trying to give them the supreme gift. But I ask you this: why not have faith that people can find god in their own way? Who knows? Maybe someday I will have a revelation and will then accept God as lord? Having faith that others are capable of finding love and salvation seems like a tenet of Christianity to me.

    Comment by Adam Nelson — July 18, 2007 @ 6:08 pm | Reply

  68. They embolden the Vermonters and Seattleites and Maineiacs.

    In point of fact, you can’t embolden a Seattlite.

    You can merely get enuff Starbucks into their system in order to shake off the moogy effect of all the BC Bud they smoke and thus make them them less somnolent at best.

    Be Well.

    Comment by dethspud — July 18, 2007 @ 6:10 pm | Reply

  69. […] who was upset that the story was even told. Where did that traffic come from – none other than Blogs for Brownback. Turns out that someone who blogs for Presidential hopeful Sam Brownback, wrote a post titled […]

    Pingback by Active Christian Media » Lesbian Gangs in Canada? — July 18, 2007 @ 6:14 pm | Reply

  70. “You can merely get enuff Starbucks into their system in order to shake off the moogy effect of all the BC Bud they smoke and thus make them them less somnolent at best.”

    … what are you talking about?

    Comment by Adam Nelson — July 18, 2007 @ 7:56 pm | Reply

  71. I think he’s trying to say that people from Seattle smoke a lot of marijuana and only compensate by drinking a lot of Starbuck’s coffee to keep themselves from falling asleep. Seattle is one of the most far-left wackjob cities on the left coast, along with Portland and San Francisco.

    British Columbia is coming close to surpassing South American Columbia for the worst drug export nation in the world. I say we start erecting the wall against Canada at Washington state and extend it across our northern border.

    Stupid Canadians say “aboot,” “hoose” and “moose” instead of “about,” “house” and “mouse” as well. If they are allowed to penetrate our northern frontier, Americans will become a modern Babel, unable to understand what others are talking aboot.

    Comment by Psycheout — July 18, 2007 @ 8:25 pm | Reply

  72. k, well here we go, using the bible to help illustrate the crux of the situationand we are going to set this out logically. For any Christian, God is Love, therefore God = Love. and this applies to any entity in the Holy Trinity.

    SO in order to understand God, one must first understand Love.

    So if we go based on “Biblical Truth” :

    1If I speak in the tongues[a] of men and of angels, but have not love, I am only a resounding gong or a clanging cymbal. 2If I have the gift of prophecy and can fathom all mysteries and all knowledge, and if I have a faith that can move mountains, but have not love, I am nothing. 3If I give all I possess to the poor and surrender my body to the flames,[b] but have not love, I gain nothing.

    4Love is patient, love is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud. 5It is not rude, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs. 6Love does not delight in evil but rejoices with the truth. 7It always protects, always trusts, always hopes, always perseveres.

    8Love never fails. But where there are prophecies, they will cease; where there are tongues, they will be stilled; where there is knowledge, it will pass away. 9For we know in part and we prophesy in part, 10but when perfection comes, the imperfect disappears. 11When I was a child, I talked like a child, I thought like a child, I reasoned like a child. When I became a man, I put childish ways behind me. 12Now we see but a poor reflection as in a mirror; then we shall see face to face. Now I know in part; then I shall know fully, even as I am fully known.

    13And now these three remain: faith, hope and love. But the greatest of these is love. – Corinthians 13 Courtesy http://www.biblegateway.com

    So understanding this as presented so beautifully, Is not “Saving souls” a way of boasting, and pride (Of which is a deadly sin) about your religion? And, if love is kind, patient, and is not easily angered, is it pleasing to the Lord to call for the complete destruction of a society over such a frivolous thing? Then claim that your faith tells you that you must do these things all because you interpret the fact that Jesus said to convert the heathens:

    Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost: Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you always, [even] unto the end of the world. Amen.

    – Matthew 28:19,20 King James Version – Courtesy wikipedia.org

    Is this not puting your faith before love? Is this not against the bible? (13And now these three remain: faith, hope and love. But the greatest of these is love.) So if you are placing your faith ahead of love, does this not make you nothing in the eyes of the Lord? (2…and if I have a faith that can move mountains, but have not love, I am nothing.)

    It is these types of inconsistencies that made me renounce Christianity in the first place. So since we’ve proven that you are now nothing, I guess, enough said…

    Comment by qaeria — July 18, 2007 @ 9:00 pm | Reply

  73. Psycheout, you are the epitomy of American Ignorance. Again, thinking one small group who happen to have an accent, and you have to try an belittle the whole Nation because of it. Again not using your brain to put together a coherent rebuttal to anything relevant.

    Also, I shouldn;t have to remind you that it was your own government that created the Drug problem in South America in order to finance your Government’s Operations in Nicaragua in the first place back in the 80’s? Isn’t it a rather convenient coincidence that Cocaine became a problem when you were at war in South America? Furthermore, this is proven on the same basis that Heroin became epidemic in the USA during the Vietnam War. BC is one of the most Liberal Provinces in Canada, and yes there is a lot of Cannabis, however, the United States Government has a history of being such ruthless drug dealers that they boost their own economy by introducing the very drugs they so publicly oppose to their own population.

    The supposed War on Terror, The US first invaded Afghanistan to actually pursue al Qaeda, the people actually responsible for 9/11, but there was no money to be made there… Instead you support the President in his illegal war for Oil profits, and the “Liberation of the Iraqi Peoples”. (Which is another euphamism of Christian evangelism) and leave Canada, and NATO to clean up the mess you made in Afghanistan.

    You should be thankful of your northern neighbours. If you actually took the time to research us, You would all find that you would not be the world super power that you are without us.

    Comment by qaeria — July 18, 2007 @ 11:00 pm | Reply

  74. I did, and that’s why I chose to also become a Citizen.

    You want to build your wall, that’s fine. It’s going to hurt you far more than us. It’s people here that make Conservatives look bad, and I am disgusted that I share Citizenship with you. However, as a citizen of both Countries, I must acknowledge your right to speak your mind.

    Next time you propose distruction of a country I hold dear, or accuse an entire Nation for the acts of an insignificant small group of people ALSO exercising their right to Freedom of Speech, thought and Religion, you had better come prepared for the fight, because pompous, short-sighted, overly righteous and immature bullying will not support your case.

    And to the sonofabitch who said evangelism is tantamount to rescuing a man from a burning car has never met a person where that happened. I know of many that begged for death when that was happening to them, and after talking to survivors, they wish for all their life that someone would have done the same to them. I guess that pretty sums up just how much people want their souls “Saved”.

    Comment by qaeria — July 18, 2007 @ 11:29 pm | Reply

  75. queria is your typical modern liberal. His comments are as “a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.”

    Pay him no mind.

    Comment by Psycheout — July 18, 2007 @ 11:57 pm | Reply

  76. It’s ok… You will prove my case from here on out. I have no doubt about that. Call me left wing if you will, you again blindly accuse me of something I am not. My work is done. Adam Nelson, a Pleasure. Find me on the Undernet. The rest of you… well… good luck with your … er .. um… goals. I’m sure your god will be most pleased at your efforts to make God fearin’ christian folk out of us all. Pathetic… I thought at least one of you would have a brain cell to fully argue your point.

    Comment by qaeria — July 19, 2007 @ 12:08 am | Reply

  77. Oh no! Don’t go qaeria! We need to be enlightened by your great wisdom. I miss qaeria already.

    Comment by Psycheout — July 19, 2007 @ 12:52 am | Reply

  78. I always knew you “Christians”, Republican-Baptists” – or whatever you want to call yourselves here – were a little different but all of you prove that you are just extremists. T.D. “Führer” Gaines-Crockett, “Psycho” Psycheout, “Syphilis” Sisyphus – you and your views are the minority. If you are looking for attention, you’ve got it. But if you are hoping to change the world, well, it’s not going to happen. You are only distancing yourself further from the rest of society. Hopefully you will eventually fall off the face of the earth. Your ruthless, fanatical behavior is wearing thin.

    Instead of knowing the facts or thinking before you speak, inflammatory comments and insults flow from your pea-sized brains. Typical of elementary school bullies. You resort to putting down others because of the way they spell their name or the way they talk. Very childish! You make it difficult for anyone else to take you seriously.

    Comment by Stephen Dyrgas — July 19, 2007 @ 11:43 am | Reply

  79. Does your mommy dress you funny, little Stevie?

    Comment by Psycheout — July 19, 2007 @ 12:01 pm | Reply

  80. Your insults don’t, and never will, bother me. However, they do prove the point that we (qaeria, Adam Nelson and others) are trying to make regarding your little “Klan”.

    Comment by Stephen Dyrgas — July 19, 2007 @ 12:15 pm | Reply

  81. It was just a simple question, Stevie.

    Comment by Psycheout — July 19, 2007 @ 12:18 pm | Reply

  82. You humor me. Thanks!! 🙂

    Comment by Stephen Dyrgas — July 19, 2007 @ 12:19 pm | Reply

  83. Stephen is about two seconds away from the Baby Jesus drop-kicking his sorry butt into the pits of Hell. His mockery of our faith is making the Lord angry.

    Comment by Mrs. T.D. Gaines-Crockett — July 19, 2007 @ 12:41 pm | Reply

  84. Your threats are as hollow as your skull Gaines-Crocket.

    Comment by qaeria — July 19, 2007 @ 12:51 pm | Reply

  85. Gaines-Crockett, it’s has nothing to do with your faith and everything to do with your extremism. You are only making a mockery of yourselves. And a great job I might add!

    Comment by Stephen Dyrgas — July 19, 2007 @ 12:59 pm | Reply

  86. LOL, hey Witch-Crockett, why don’t you just break out “Little David” and go postal on him!? Hahaha!!

    Comment by Adam Nelson — July 20, 2007 @ 7:45 am | Reply

  87. LOL, Hey Pervert-Nelson and Canadian-Dygras, why don’t you both just keep on laughing while you still can? End Times are upon us and you will not find anything funny when you are left behind to suffer the wrath of God.

    Your complete lack of faith, humility, and morals have already decided your fate. Praying for you at this point would be a complete waste of time and effort.

    Comment by Mrs. T.D. Gaines-Crockett — July 20, 2007 @ 8:01 am | Reply

  88. Republican Presidential Nomination: 07/09/2007 – 07/18/2007

    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/youdecide2008/index.html

    Giuliani 25.0%
    Thompson 20.0%
    McCain 13.5%
    Romney 10.0%
    Brownback ???

    “Brownie, you’re doing a heck of a job!”

    [Ed Note: Posting this identical comment in 8 comment threads qualifies as spam. Do it again and you will be banned.]

    Comment by Tyler Durden — July 20, 2007 @ 8:16 am | Reply

  89. Tubbs-Crockett, the only reason why “End Times” may be upon us is because of losers like you who want to blow up anyone who doesn’t agree with your little cult. Isn’t it time for you to take your medication now? If you don’t, someone will come along with the little white jacket and throw you into the padded room with no windows. Hmmm, that kinda sound like Hell to me!!! 🙂

    Comment by Stephen Dyrgas — July 20, 2007 @ 8:23 am | Reply

  90. You’ll be laughing out the other side of your soul when the End Days are upon us, Stephen.

    Comment by Sisyphus — July 20, 2007 @ 8:28 am | Reply

  91. Ahh, Syphilis is back too. Good morning. How I missed you.

    Forget about the End Days, I’m laughing right now!!

    Comment by Stephen Dyrgas — July 20, 2007 @ 8:43 am | Reply

  92. Stephen,

    Look here you imbecile; don’t you have a minimum wage job to get to? Instead of pestering people here all day just put on your uniform and go drop some French-fries. While you are doing it, you can think about what a fool you sound like every time you open your mouth.

    And should you fall asleep on the job face first into a vat of hot grease then so be it, it was God’s will.

    Comment by Mrs. T.D. Gaines-Crockett — July 20, 2007 @ 8:46 am | Reply

  93. “End Times are upon us and you will not find anything funny when you are left behind to suffer the wrath of God. ”

    … Aaaah hahahaha!! LOL just like end times were going to come at the year 1000? Then the year 2000? Hah, whatever there Witch-Crockett. Turns out that YOU’RE the blasphemer and every day you violate the second commandment! That, and you’re actually a witch, since you cast auras on people to protect them from bewitchments and charms.

    “Look here you imbecile; don’t you have a minimum wage job to get to?”

    Hey Witch-Crockett, don’t YOU have a job to get to? Oh wait, you think women are naturally inferior and shouldn’t leave the home. Adding onto that, you’re far too big an idiot to actually perform any job other than cooking a roast for your equally deadbeat husband. Oh well, nobody will cry that you never leave the house!

    Lol I can just see you in a “The End Is Near!!!” sign parading drunk down the streets of New York. Well, Witch-Prophet, you’re just inherently better than everybody else I guess……. LOL!!!!!!

    Comment by Adam Nelson — July 20, 2007 @ 9:29 am | Reply

  94. Sorry T.D. Hooker, I forgot to say good morning to you too. Along with your little friends, you are the only fools here. None of you have said anything to give yourselves any credibility. It’s the same old bullpoop over and ever again. And it’s beginning to bore me…..

    Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz… Damn, better watch out for that hot grease!

    [Ed Note: Please tone down the foul language. This is a family website.]

    Comment by Stephen Dyrgas — July 20, 2007 @ 9:33 am | Reply

  95. Ahh, excellent come-back Adam!!! Very nice!

    \m/

    Comment by Stephen Dyrgas — July 20, 2007 @ 9:35 am | Reply

  96. “Ahh, Syphilis is back too. Good morning. How I missed you.”

    Work is overwhelming me.

    “Forget about the End Days, I’m laughing right now!!”

    There’s still time to repent.

    “Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz… Damn, better watch out for that hot grease!”

    Please don’t share your Onanistic proclivities with the rest of us.

    Comment by Sisyphus — July 20, 2007 @ 9:36 am | Reply

  97. “Please don’t share your Onanistic proclivities with the rest of us.” – Sisyphus

    Wow, talk about being perverted!! You put down Adam and everyone else for no good reason and now me too. None of my comments have been of a sexual nature.

    I really think you are in need of some medication too. Or maybe I could ship you some really good ‘stuff’. After all, I live in Canada and according to all of you, we are now the largest exporter of drugs. Right? You said it so it must be true!

    Comment by Stephen Dyrgas — July 20, 2007 @ 9:45 am | Reply

  98. This is such a funny thread… I mean, look at the title! Canada: Land of Militant Female Sodomy.

    I’ve been doing some reading, and apparently the definition of Sodomy is anything that’s not regular, coital sex. Therefore, anything other than regular missionary-style sex is sodomy. Even regular foreplay is technically sodomy! So given that in mind, I’m a sodomite and damn proud of it!!🙂

    Comment by Adam Nelson — July 20, 2007 @ 9:50 am | Reply

  99. At least you are admitting your sins, Adam. Next comes atonement.

    Comment by Mrs. T.D. Gaines-Crockett — July 20, 2007 @ 10:04 am | Reply

  100. If having consenting, and amazingly elaborate, sex with my fiancee is a sin, then look out, Satan! I need a two bedroom corner unit please!

    Yep, it’s too bad you and your wife can’t have sex, Witch-Prophet. Although, there is a Stag Shop I can recommend for you if you need to spice up your (probably very barren) sex life.

    Comment by Adam Nelson — July 20, 2007 @ 10:11 am | Reply

  101. You are vile. No one here want to hear about your mancapades with your “fiance”.

    Comment by Mrs. T.D. Gaines-Crockett — July 20, 2007 @ 10:15 am | Reply

  102. Oh so, once again, having sex with my fianceE (notice the extra “e”; even you shouldn’t have trouble with that) is vile. Well, trust me, I could regail you with tales of bedroom antics the likes of which you have never encountered! So take back your voodoo charms and sorcery and go have sex with YOUR wife. I’m sure that (s)he has nothing to do on a Friday afternoon, just like every other weekday and weekend.

    Comment by Adam Nelson — July 20, 2007 @ 10:22 am | Reply

  103. “Wow, talk about being perverted!! You put down Adam and everyone else for no good reason and now me too. None of my comments have been of a sexual nature.”

    You were talking about using hot grease in a bedroom context. It sounded vile beyond conception to me.

    “I really think you are in need of some medication too. Or maybe I could ship you some really good ’stuff’. After all, I live in Canada and according to all of you, we are now the largest exporter of drugs. Right? You said it so it must be true!”

    I don’t want to have anything to do with Canada or its poisons. You people should be freed of your lesbians, but if that’s impossible we need to cleanse you from our borders. Too many previously-decent Americans have been contaminated by your base, valueless nation. Only after your values are those of a Christian nation can we all be free from the consequences of your evil.

    Comment by Sisyphus — July 20, 2007 @ 11:05 am | Reply

  104. Ok, Sisyphus, if you like, we can stop sending you petroleum products. Oh wait, you actually receive three times more petroleum products from us than you do from any other nation. But… don’t you need your oil? Well, if you’re SURE you want to close the border… After all, you don’t want our poisons.

    Comment by Adam Nelson — July 20, 2007 @ 11:28 am | Reply

  105. Ok, Sisyphus, if you like, we can stop sending you petroleum products. Oh wait, you actually receive three times more petroleum products from us than you do from any other nation. But… don’t you need your oil? Well, if you’re SURE you want to close the border… After all, you don’t want our poisons.”

    If you stop sending us oil, we’ll finally correct the border oversights of 1812 and overrun your lesbian-loving nation. Anyone who doesn’t like it can move to the Moonbat Nation of Vermont. We’ll surround you loons with garbage and guards, and never let anyone out.

    Comment by Sisyphus — July 20, 2007 @ 1:28 pm | Reply

  106. I find it funny how certain circles of psychology state that men typically have a deep desire to fornicate with their mothers. However since most people recognize that this is not the proper thing to do, they do the next best thing… they marry women that are like their mothers. so if Jesus married a hooker (Mary Magdolin) what does that say about the “Virgin” Mary? Kind of shoots down immaculate conception to me. (You think this is insulting?? You should see what the American Founding Fathers had to say about the likes of you!! And it’s all on the public record!)

    The end of days is near yes… all it takes is some right wing christian kookjob with his finger on the button. We already tread close to that point having Dubyah in the big chair, but fortunately he’s too stupid to pose much of a threat, considering he’s on the public record wondering what state “Norway” was in. He’s more likely to nuke Jeb in Florida than actually hit Canada.

    I just take comfort in the fact that when you guys are all dead, and you face whatever higher power that waits for us, you will be judged for your actions. You don’t preach love and forgiveness.. you cover your greed and zeal with those words. So enjoy hell, because wherever I go in the afterlife is not where you are going, and THAT is my idea of heaven.

    And since God speaks to you directly gaines-crocket (Seriously… they have medication for that), and tells you when he’s angry, you can tell him that I invite him over to my house for some coffee, and a good old fashion smiting. Since he’s “All-Powerful”, he should know where to find me. Hopefully he can also purge us of our lesbians that are worse than the Mosquitos this year. Salmo might miss out on some cookies, but I guess we could manage.

    Any of you grow a braincell and ready to put forth an intelligent argument with facts yet, or is it just stupidity and religious zeal still on the menu? Us Canadians can play like this indefinitely. We’re here to save your brains… You’ll thank us later.

    Comment by qaeria — July 20, 2007 @ 1:30 pm | Reply

  107. and “Correct the border oversights of 1812”?? Read your history dude… you tried to invade, and you got schooled. We can resume classes at any time. Maybe this time, we might decide to save the seattlites, vermonters, and maineacs from nazi persecution.

    Comment by qaeria — July 20, 2007 @ 1:35 pm | Reply

  108. Wow… I can’t believe how seriously messed up you people are:

    – Putting words in other people’s mouths.
    – Lies.
    – Insults.
    – Extremist thoughts and comments.

    I didn’t think that people like you really existed. Guess I was wrong.

    [Ed Note: Please watch your language. I’m getting tired of warning people about this. If you cannot respect the family-friendly nature of this website, you won’t be allowed to comment here anymore. Don’t be the first to be banned.]

    Comment by Stephen Dyrgas — July 20, 2007 @ 2:11 pm | Reply

  109. Sisyphus, if you ever tried anything aggressive against Canada, you would be obliterated in a giant ball of nuclear fire. We have the entire world on our side. So unless you’re ready to simultaneously attack every other nation simultaneously, I suggest you rethink your annexation strategy. Remember Hitler fighting a two-front war? How about America fighting a hundred-front war?

    Comment by Adam Nelson — July 20, 2007 @ 2:39 pm | Reply

  110. [Ed Note: Please watch your language. I’m getting tired of warning people about this. If you cannot respect the family-friendly nature of this website, you won’t be allowed to comment here anymore. Don’t be the first to be banned.] –

    What… responding with logical facts to extremist desires to destroy another country is against the family nature of this site?? So what your really saying is, as long as we blindly misinterpret the core of the christian faith, call every person who disagrees with us a homosexual, and threaten to use weapons of mass destruction on a peaceful society, this will then fit with your concept of “Family-Friendly”?

    I must be in the Twilight Zone. Fortunately Religious fanaticism does not trump Constitutional right to free speech. You can’t poke a bee-hive and not expect to get stung. Remember that the next time.

    Furthermore, I think all Canadian respondents have behaved themselves. At least they took the time to research and put forth FACTS. All the other side did was demonstrate behaviour of a petty bully. Ban whomever you choose… There are plenty of other forums where one can speak about this.

    Comment by qaeria — July 20, 2007 @ 3:18 pm | Reply

  111. From what I can see from all of this is a lot of hate from a group that supposedly is promoting love. I see no signs of understanding as was one of Christs teachings one would think follwers would be understanding. There is little or no debate going on here. Nor do I believe that the group posting on this site wish there to be debate. To those who have replied with honest and logical counterpoints to the posts there has been nothing but open hostility. I can only pray that these people never achieve any real power.

    Mrs. T.D. Gaines-Crockett – It saddens me that people out there might acutally purchase and read your book.

    Comment by thebomb — July 20, 2007 @ 3:47 pm | Reply

  112. qaeria, when our web administrator leaves a note warning about foul language, he italicizes the ugly words that have been replaced with softer language. No ideas are being censored here, but swearing is not tolerated.

    I saw Stephen’s original comment, it didn’t say we were “messed up.” It was originally much worse. Use your imagination. But do not use foul language or our administrator will be forced to take whatever action he sees fit.

    Comment by Psycheout — July 20, 2007 @ 4:09 pm | Reply

  113. I had to cover my eyes when I saw that, Psycheout.

    Comment by Mrs. T.D. Gaines-Crockett — July 20, 2007 @ 4:25 pm | Reply

  114. ok, I can respect that. I apologize then for the foul language on behalf of my countrymen. It is not appropriate no matter what you believe in. It just appeared to me that it was the context of our arguements that was the problem. Thank goodness I proofread what I write… as tempting as it is, Swearing is something to do elsewhere. Thank you for clarifying.

    Comment by qaeria — July 20, 2007 @ 4:42 pm | Reply

  115. Wow… the first Intelligent thing said to me… maybe there is hope after all

    Comment by qaeria — July 20, 2007 @ 4:43 pm | Reply

  116. Oh no, little Stevie said a bad word. What a terrible, terrible thing I have done. Give me a break. It pales in comparison to all of your inflammatory remarks. Saying one word doesn’t compare to the wishing of pain, suffering and even death on others, which is exactly what you freaks are doing. And for no good reason. So let’s grow up and get your priorities straight.

    Comment by Stephen Dyrgas — July 20, 2007 @ 4:43 pm | Reply

  117. Well I’ll agree with Stephen on this one. While as unleasant as his use of profanity is to you, the blind hatred and wishing to kill or harm millions of innocent people is far more troubling. Whatever happened to love all gods children? More people have been killed in the name of god by Chirstians throughout history than any other cause. I can’t believe that anyone who believes in god can somehow try to justify this. Give your collective heads a shake and leave the judgement to god.

    Comment by thebomb — July 20, 2007 @ 4:53 pm | Reply

  118. Great point, but swearing does reduce us to their level, and I don’t know about you, but I don’t think there is a pressure washer powerful enough on this planet that could wash that kind of scum off of me. Let’s just do what we do best, and use our brains..

    However, in light of the topic at hand, we have one side presenting subject matter that is perceived as extremely offensive, and the other getting caught up in their passion to try and respond. Whether this is a family friendly site or not, as a father, this subject is not exactly family friendly. Maybe the site administrators should recognize this, and allow for both sides to express fully how they feel. If that means a little bit of profanity, so be it.

    I personally try to watch what I say, so on with the fight, shall we?

    Comment by qaeria — July 20, 2007 @ 5:10 pm | Reply

  119. Point taken, qaeria. Thanks for getting me back on the right track. There is no way in He…

    I mean, I don’t want to be categorized along with these ‘folks’ so I promise to watch my language.🙂

    Comment by Stephen Dyrgas — July 20, 2007 @ 5:25 pm | Reply

  120. More people have been killed in the name of god by Chirstians throughout history than any other cause.

    Prove your left-wing atheist talking point please, bucko.

    And, what’s a Chirstian?

    Comment by Psycheout — July 20, 2007 @ 6:06 pm | Reply

  121. The extinction of countless cultures all in the name of Christ is proof. The Crusades, Salem Witch hunts, Spanish conquistadors, Goa-India the list is endless. Try looking in books not titled holy bible, and the proof is there.

    Comment by qaeria — July 20, 2007 @ 6:29 pm | Reply

  122. Wow, I’m convinced.

    Comment by Psycheout — July 20, 2007 @ 6:33 pm | Reply

  123. Psycheout, he has a pretty convincing list there. You asked for proof, and he gave you plenty. To deny any of the events he listed is to deny established history. Oh wait, the libruls did it! …and the Sodomites. Them too. Along with the socio-Darwinists! Yep, everybody but Psycheout and Gaines-Crockett are to blame for the world’s problems.

    “Bad language is indecent! Violence is indecent! Killing billions of people and smashing people who think different than me about politics is ok, though!” -Conservative values

    Comment by Adam Nelson — July 20, 2007 @ 10:37 pm | Reply

  124. By definition a christian is someone who follows Christ’s teachings. But I guess my reference was more directed towards Catholics but many christian groups are guilty.

    Comment by thebomb — July 21, 2007 @ 2:56 am | Reply

  125. homosexual taliban? crushed canadian freedom? what in the heck are you talking about you pathetic american propagandist nothing you have said has any fact in it you imbecile Canada is far more free then your messed up country with your inbred roots you should maybe learn to look past your bible and view the world around you now i know the majority of the american public does not think like you nor share you views but man grow the fudge up the only real power house pointing guns at people is you the only thing people such as yourself accomplish is to spread intolerance and hate while making the world just that much worse off then it was before if you want to find true crime and true threat look within your own borders your a bunch of mean people

    [Ed Note: Why do Canadians use so many swear words, eh? If y’all don’t knock it off, y’all will be banned. That’s what I’m talkin’ aboot. And for God’s sake, buy some punctuation, Demockracy.]

    Comment by Demockracy — July 21, 2007 @ 3:01 am | Reply

  126. ban away you gosh darn censor nazi when ur burning in a hot place ill be the one pooping in the mouth of your corpse and having non-consensual sex with your daughter woohoo go lesbian gangs!

    [Ed Note: Your foul language makes the baby Jesus cry. X-O]

    Comment by Demockracy — July 21, 2007 @ 3:23 am | Reply

  127. I like pie.

    [Ed Note: Knock that off!]

    Comment by Demockracy — July 21, 2007 @ 3:57 am | Reply

  128. if i knock it off the pie will be on the floor.. then i cant eat it…

    [Ed Note: Posting drunk never pays, kids. Just don’t do it. Just say no.]

    Comment by Demockracy — July 21, 2007 @ 4:02 am | Reply

  129. best add ever lol

    Comment by Demockracy — July 21, 2007 @ 4:09 am | Reply

  130. thats right! dont post drunk, post stoned!

    Comment by Demockracy — July 21, 2007 @ 4:15 am | Reply

  131. Best song ever

    You’re wrong about virtues of Christianity
    And you’re wrong if you agree with Sean Hannity
    If you think that pride is about nationality, you’re wrong

    You’re wrong when you imprison people turning tricks
    And you’re wrong about trickle down economics
    If you think that punk rock doesn’t mix with politics, you’re wrong

    You’re wrong for hating queers and eating steers
    If you kill for the thrill of the hunt
    You’re wrong ’bout wearing fur and not hating Ann Coulter
    Cause she’s a not a nice person

    You’re wrong if you celebrate Columbus Day
    And You’re wrong if you think there will be a Judgement Day
    If you’re a charter member of the NRA, you’re wrong

    You’re wrong if you support capital punishment
    And you’re wrong if you don’t question your government
    If you think her reproductive rights are inconsequent, you’re wrong

    You’re wrong fighting Jihad, your blind faith in God
    Your religions are all flawed,
    You’re wrong about drug use, when its not abuse
    I hope you never reproduce

    You’re getting high on the downlow
    A victim of Cointelpro
    You’re wrong and will probably never know

    [Ed Note: Some people never learn. Blam!]

    Comment by Demockracy — July 21, 2007 @ 4:29 am | Reply

  132. In my part of the country we have ways of dealing with your kind, Demockracy. However, seeing as you probably live in California I have filed a complaint about your lyrics with the FCC. Someone will be by your house later today to arrest you for debauchery, immorality and most likely treason.

    Comment by Mrs. T.D. Gaines-Crockett — July 21, 2007 @ 6:34 am | Reply

  133. “In my part of the country we have ways of dealing with your kind, Demockracy. However, seeing as you probably live in California I have filed a complaint about your lyrics with the FCC. Someone will be by your house later today to arrest you for debauchery, immorality and most likely treason.”

    Idiot. YOU’RE the traitor who insists that America was founded on Christian roots. LOL! Have you actually ever read what people like Jefferson, Lincoln and Franlkin say about religion in general? No, because you’re stupid.

    “I have filed a complaint about your lyrics with the FCC”

    Well I’M telling my mommy, so there!

    “Someone will be by your house later today to arrest you for debauchery, immorality and most likely treason.”

    Oh no! Can I borrow Little David!? HAAAHAHAHA!

    Comment by Adam Nelson — July 21, 2007 @ 7:06 am | Reply

  134. Adam,

    Every time you open your ignorant mouth, you lose a little bit more of common sense. To your kind that is a precious commodity so, you might consider the consequences of making so many banal remarks. Eventually there is not going to be anything left to you but a shell of stupidity.

    For the preservation of your mental health, do not bother responding.

    Comment by Mrs. T.D. Gaines-Crockett — July 21, 2007 @ 7:21 am | Reply

  135. “To your kind that is a precious commodity”

    Well, I always figured that “your kind” never valued common sense, but it’s good to hear it coming from you.

    Comment by Adam Nelson — July 21, 2007 @ 8:41 am | Reply

  136. Basically from what I can gather. If you don’t have the same view as Gaines-Crockett and Psycheout then you are completely wrong and must be going to hell for it. Any views opposed to their own can only be met with insults and threats of nuclear attacks. Isn’t democracy grande?

    Comment by thebomb — July 21, 2007 @ 11:36 am | Reply

  137. If you don’t have the same view as Gaines-Crockett and Psycheout then you are completely wrong

    Bingo!

    Comment by Psycheout — July 21, 2007 @ 12:14 pm | Reply

  138. Psycheout Vanity is a sin.

    Comment by thebomb — July 21, 2007 @ 12:31 pm | Reply

  139. Under the O, number 69…

    Comment by Stephen Dyrgas — July 21, 2007 @ 12:35 pm | Reply

  140. […] Simply, because I’m Canadian! Alright, it may also have something to do with the fact that I made it known to them that I am opposed to their backward, extremist ideas. They are ruthless, religious fanatics who […]

    Pingback by Dyrgas Gate (To Hell)??? « Dyrgas Gate — July 21, 2007 @ 1:39 pm | Reply

  141. Well most of us here are opposed to extremists. Well except of course for the few extremists posting and commenting here. You know who you are.

    Comment by thebomb — July 21, 2007 @ 2:12 pm | Reply

  142. OHS NOES!!!!!!!!!!!!! Not the FCC whatever will i do? i guess i better get out of California… wait… im not from California… phew!!! guess im safe from you’re american oppression WOOHOO!!!

    “In my part of the country we have ways of dealing with your kind, Demockracy.”

    would that include wearing bedsheets and stringing people up in a tree?

    “Someone will be by your house later today to arrest you for debauchery, immorality and most likely treason.”

    Good luck!!! i live in a van down by the river!!

    [Ed Note: Like Cheech & Chong, this guy is obviously still smokin’.]

    Comment by Demockracy — July 21, 2007 @ 2:32 pm | Reply

  143. People wonder why kids bring guns to school and kill people. When looking at the example set by Gaines-Crockett and Psycheout it’s little wonder. What you are preaching is that killing those who are different from you is not only acceptable but desirable actions. It’s people like you who are doing your part to corrupt the youth and ensure the killing continues through to the next generation.

    Comment by thebomb — July 21, 2007 @ 3:09 pm | Reply

  144. I like pie.

    Comment by Demockracy — July 21, 2007 @ 3:11 pm | Reply

  145. lol i love the “america’s shame” 5,613,525 children dead from abortion, well hey.. thats a good start! now if we could get the rest of them to just put a bullet in their heads the world would be a great place! everyday i wake up and think to myself “jesus, when are those damn Americans going to attack.. they need to be schooled” and Canada’s the country to do it!!
    Ô Canada!
    Terre de nos aïeux,
    Ton front est ceint de fleurons glorieux!
    Car ton bras sait porter l’épée,
    Il sait porter la croix!
    Ton histoire est une épopée
    Des plus brillants exploits.
    Et ta valeur, de foi trempée,
    Protégera nos foyers et nos droits,
    Protégera nos foyers et nos droits.

    O Canada!
    Our home and native land!
    True patriot love in all thy sons command.
    With glowing hearts we see thee rise,
    The True North strong and free!
    From far and wide, O Canada,
    We stand on guard for thee.
    God keep our land glorious and free!
    O Canada, we stand on guard for thee.
    O Canada, we stand on guard for thee.

    Comment by Demockracy — July 21, 2007 @ 3:24 pm | Reply

  146. People wonder why kids bring guns to school and kill people. When looking at the example set by Gaines-Crockett and Psycheout it’s little wonder.

    Great argument, thebozo. Run with it!

    Comment by Psycheout — July 21, 2007 @ 5:57 pm | Reply

  147. “Great argument, thebozo. Run with it!” – Psycho

    I sure don’t see you validating any of your ridiculous statements! That’s because it’s all rubbish. Oh, except in the mind of a psychotic, like yourself.

    Comment by Stephen Dyrgas — July 21, 2007 @ 6:18 pm | Reply

  148. Which ridiculous statements, Mr. Generalization?

    Comment by Psycheout — July 21, 2007 @ 6:45 pm | Reply

  149. ALL of them!!!!

    Comment by Stephen Dyrgas — July 21, 2007 @ 6:56 pm | Reply

  150. cant we all just get along and torch the whitehouse..? again…

    Comment by Demockracy — July 21, 2007 @ 7:11 pm | Reply

  151. Well I can see we’re dealing with intellectuals here. The rebutal to my statement was calling me thebozo. A quick wit to be sure.

    Comment by thebomb — July 21, 2007 @ 8:15 pm | Reply

  152. Whenevr you feel frustrated by their idiotic arguments or ad hominem attacks and flawed logic, just remember the name of this post. “Canada, Land of Militant Female Sodomy” I mean, seriously. No wonder nobody takes them seriously. OH wait, they are the “silent majority”… but they’re so silent that they don’t vote for Brownback, indicating his 3 percent statistic.

    Comment by Adam Nelson — July 21, 2007 @ 9:22 pm | Reply

  153. i watched a gay porn once with a guy named Demockracy in it

    [Ed Note: Very interesting. Why are you sharing this with us?]

    Comment by Demockracy — July 21, 2007 @ 10:02 pm | Reply

  154. Adam Nelson true enough. It’s hard to take anyone seriously when they offer nothing but weak supposition and when asked to back up their statements they simply insult you. If there were any fact to their claims perhaps some people might actually take their ramblings seriously. We offer counterpoints based in fact to which they cannot refute.

    Comment by thebomb — July 21, 2007 @ 10:02 pm | Reply

  155. now now thats not very “freedom of speech” of you to edit somthing like that, how unamerican of you. figured it might be enlightening.. you know lots of these politicians have shady pasts😉

    Comment by Demockracy — July 21, 2007 @ 10:35 pm | Reply

  156. Yet another great song

    Jesus Christ will resurrect
    He’s got his BMI royalty to collect
    He’s not the white fragile hippie
    He looks and acts more like an indignant ICE-T
    Jesus Christ is coming back
    He wants to kick Mel Gibson’s ass
    Superstar, The Passion of
    He wants his money, not your love

    He’s been kickin’ 2000 years
    He’s fixed a lot of sports
    and drank a million beers
    Some ecstasy, a thin white line
    He says designer drugs beat the hell out of wine
    Jesus Christ on vacation
    Spreading mass sacreligion
    “Sex and drugs, we abstain”
    He thinks Christians are insane
    They don’t know love,
    they know fear and moral hauteur
    Scare tactics I never taught
    “If you’re gonna look to me,
    better get rose colored shades,
    Cuz what you see is what you get”

    Comment by Demockracy — July 22, 2007 @ 5:29 am | Reply

  157. Facts, schmacts. Facts are anti-Christian and are naturally biased against good, old-fashioned, down-home idiots.

    Comment by Adam Nelson — July 22, 2007 @ 7:06 am | Reply

  158. Having fun while I was away?

    Well since these people consider themselves to be the supreme culture, and not only America, but all the world should subscribe to their nazi (Republican-Baptist) ways. Since I and thebomb have hinted that these FACTS are out there, I thought maybe I should take a page from your own history.

    Most true americans revere and are proud of their forefathers, except for maybe Lincoln, because now these guys don’t get the ultimate in cheap labour any more. The American Forefathers though, had a pretty good idea of your caste of zealous Christ-shun. This information is a matter of public record, however since it does not appear in the Holy Bible, or the “Left Behind” books, I doubt you’d even take the time to look it up.

    Thomas Jefferson – “In every country and every age, the priest has been hostile to liberty. He is always in alliance with the despot, abetting his abuses in return for protection to his own. It is easier to acquire wealth and power by this combination than by deserving them, and to effect this, they have perverted the purest religion ever preached to man into mystery and jargon, unintelligible to all mankind, and therefore the safer for their purposes.”

    “There is not one redeeming feature in our superstition of Christianity. It has made one half the world fools, and the other half hypocrites.”

    “The clergy converted the simple teachings of Jesus into an engine for enslaving mankind and adulterated by artificial constructions into a contrivance to filch wealth and power themselves…these clergy, in fact, constitute the real Anti-Christ.”

    Benjamin Franklin – “I wish it (Christianity) were more productive of good works … I mean real good works … not holy-day keeping, sermon-hearing … or making long prayers, filled with flatteries and compliments despised by wise men, and much less capable of pleasing the Deity.”

    “Lighthouses are more helpful than churches.”

    John Adams – “The government of the United States is not in any sense founded on the Christian religion.” (Treaty of Tripoli, Article 11: Written during the Administration of George Washington and signed into law by John Adams.)

    “As I understand the Christian religion, it was, and is, a revelation. But how has it happened that millions of fables, tales, legends, have been blended with both Jewish and Christian revelation that have made them the most bloody religion that ever existed?”

    Thomas Paine – “What is it the Bible teaches us? — rapine, cruelty, and murder. What is it the Testament teaches us? — to believe that the Almighty committed debauchery with a woman engaged to be married, and the belief of this debauchery is called faith.”

    “As to the Christian system of faith, it appears to me as a species of Atheism — a sort of religious denial of God. It professes to believe in a man rather than in God. It is a compound made up Chiefly of Manism with but little Deism, and is an near Atheism as twilight is to darkness. It introduces between man and his Maker an opaque body, which it calls a Redeemer, as the moon introduces her opaque self between the earth and the sun, and it produces by this means a religious, or an irreligious eclipse of light. It has put the whole orbit of reason into shade.”

    James Madison (Yes, the co-author of the Declaration of Independance) – “During almost fifteen centuries has the legal establishment of Christianity been on trial. What has been its fruits? More or less, in all places, pride and indolence in the clergy; ignorance and servility in the laity; in both, superstition, bigotry, and persecution.”

    “In no instance have … the churches been guardians of the liberties of the people.”

    “Religious bondage shackles and debilitates the mind and unfits it for every noble enterprise.”

    “We hold it for a fundamental and undeniable truth that religion, or the duty which we owe our Creator, and the manner of discharging it, can be directed only by reason and conviction, not by force or violence. The religion, then, of every man must be left to the conviction and conscience of every man: and that it is the right of every man to exercise it as these may dictate.”

    So history is starting to illustrate that these radical Christ-shuns (I call you this because Christ is the only thing you think of, and shun all else) were, and still basically are comparable to the rats that stowed away on vessels coming to America to spread their disease. Fortunately having intelligence offers immunity. The very historical figures who made it so you have that “Free” nation of yours, hated and despised you then, as you are now.

    Go back to your rock, crawl back under, and let the grownups have their grownup time, ok?

    Comment by qaeria — July 22, 2007 @ 8:54 am | Reply

  159. LOL I love their argument for America being a God-based nation. Essentially, their only proof is they sometimes poetically use the word God in their sentences (such as God-given inalienable rights, etc.) Then they choose to ignore the OVERWHELMING amount of quotes from folks like Jefferson who basically say “religion has made people idiots and fakes.” Yep, bury your head in the sand guys.

    Comment by Adam Nelson — July 22, 2007 @ 9:33 am | Reply

  160. Very nice work, qaeria! Thanks!

    Comment by Stephen Dyrgas — July 22, 2007 @ 9:38 am | Reply

  161. Screw a churchy frigging Anti freedom freak like Brown. Me and My wife Both are republican voters. We are also retired sex workers you can see my PJ still today in some 80s videos still selling good.We love personal freedom to express. And Just look at history the loudest objectors to sex for fun are the ones usually caught with there hands in the cookie! Jim baker jimmy swaggart Vitter more recently Poop to many to list even.. Keep your morality Outta my bedroom thank you If my girl wants a little Kitty from time to time thats her Biz not the GOVTS.

    [Ed Note: Language, please. This is a family website, not an adult video.]

    Comment by Mike Hardone — July 22, 2007 @ 12:10 pm | Reply

  162. So sorry . maybe a good dose of Brat girl would loosen a few folks up(plus we could use the royaltys}. Hey maybe a trip to Key West for Fantasy fest this oct to let them see how their baptist brothers and sisters party when they think no one is watching. Gotta love those Part Thy Legs Club members and followers. KINKY FRIEDMAN In 08! A vote for true freedom. http://www.fantasyfest.com

    Comment by Mike Hardone — July 22, 2007 @ 12:27 pm | Reply

  163. British Columbia is coming close to surpassing South American Columbia for the worst drug export nation in the world. I say we start erecting the wall against Canada at Washington state and extend it across our northern border.

    Okay but then we’re gonna start charging more for the stuff.

    You Americandyasses relgious whack jobs are funnier thanb a barrel full of monkeys, ya know that.

    If it weren’t fer you guys Spud never woulda known that America was founded by God and Haiti by Satan.

    Strewth! Spud read it on a http://www.christianworldviewnetwork.com/article.php/2294/Janet_L_Folger

    Qaeria purely rawks on this thread.

    Be Well.

    Comment by dethspud — July 22, 2007 @ 12:47 pm | Reply

  164. BC does not export Drugs. They export Pot a harmless weed created by GOD Man created Booze. Just how much have you had to drink today?

    Comment by Mike Hardone — July 22, 2007 @ 1:06 pm | Reply

  165. See, they use deception and subterfuge in their headlines. They are, in fact, one of the “worst” drug exporters. Too bad they fail to mention that they export LEGAL drugs! Didn’t see that in the headline, did you? Typical Conservative deceit.

    Comment by Adam Nelson — July 22, 2007 @ 9:22 pm | Reply

  166. Drugs are drugs, Adam. If liberals had their way, heroin would be legal. Anyway, marijuana causes insanity. Alcohol, while also a deplorable substance, does not. Clearly, if one of them has to be legal, it should be alcohol.

    Comment by Sisyphus — July 23, 2007 @ 6:30 am | Reply

  167. Not so clearly, Sisyphus. Marijuana has well-established and documented medicinal applications. It is often used to alleviate extreme pain, but has other controlled medical uses. Alcohol, on the other hand, is totally useless for medical purposes because it reacts badly, often lethally, with many other drugs, and impedes doctors from actually doing their job because of it. Therefore, based on actual usefulness, marijuana should be legal while alcohol, purely a pleasure item, should not be.

    And no, drugs are not drugs. Pennicillin is a drug. So is acetominiphin. Life without those two drugs would be much more painful than it is now. And that is what BC specializes in exporting, NOT illegal controlled substances like heroin or methamphetamine, as the comment would lead one to believe.

    Comment by Adam Nelson — July 23, 2007 @ 7:45 am | Reply

  168. True, Adam.

    They must need look only at their own government to find the people responsible for “Importing” drugs like Cocaine, Heroin, and Meth.

    I think this one is done. Game, set, match.

    Thanks to all for providing much needed comedy. Especially the zealots. Your performance should be a sign of how your precious Brownback will do. Since you supposed Warriors of god can’t even put forth a proper debate, I suspect your little puppet will do just as good when the time comes. I suppose maybe there are miracles. How else would you explain the fact that brownback is a senator? Maybe the US supreme court had to pull a few strings for him as well to put him in power? Worked for Dubyah…

    Comment by qaeria — July 23, 2007 @ 8:23 am | Reply

  169. “Most of what John Lennon was trying to tell us is equally appropriate now as it was when he was staying in Canada in 1969.” – Ritchie Yorke, Writer

    http://www.cbc.ca/arts/music/story/2007/07/23/lennon-rcmp.html

    Comment by Stephen Dyrgas — July 23, 2007 @ 4:19 pm | Reply

  170. Leftists love Lenin.

    Comment by Psycheout — July 23, 2007 @ 4:22 pm | Reply

  171. leftist don’t like facists psycho… Try taking your smart pills before spouting your insults.

    Comment by qaeria — July 23, 2007 @ 4:33 pm | Reply

  172. Leftists are fascists, q.

    Comment by Psycheout — July 23, 2007 @ 4:55 pm | Reply

  173. No, Psycheout, that title belongs to you. Observe:

    “…nationalism, authoritarianism, statism, militarism, corporatism, populism, totalitarianism, anti-communism, racism and opposition to economic and political liberalism.”
    (De Felice, Renzo Fascism : an informal introduction to its theory and practice, an interview with Michael Ledeen, New Brunswick, N.J. : Transaction Books, 1976)

    Yep, makes sense to me that Liberals are opposed to economic and political liberalism.

    As even an idiot like BJ can see here, everything you stand for: opposition to Liberalism, strong militarism, nationalism, anti-communism, and even racism (i.e. gay intolerance), all these things are common between you and fascism.

    By the very definition of the word, you ARE fascist.

    Hitler himself described fascism as “…being a right-wing collectivistic ideology in opposition to socialism, liberalism, democracy and individualism.”

    If you think the author was some Lefty Moonbat or something, then I will happily source other historians for you. But oh wait, this goes against your immutable beliefs, and therefore all these historians must be wrong.

    Heil Brownback!

    Comment by Adam Nelson — July 23, 2007 @ 5:37 pm | Reply

  174. Adam,

    Unless it appears in the Holy Bible, or the Left Behind books, they lack the mental capacity to learn… he just wants to pout and call me names to show he’s ready finally for Grade 3. Pretty good since he now surpasses the average education level for the “South”. Psycho, keep on trying there slugger… you’ll catch up to the adults soon enough.

    Comment by qaeria — July 23, 2007 @ 7:20 pm | Reply

  175. “Psycho, keep on trying there slugger… you’ll catch up to the adults soon enough” – qaeria

    Ummm, I’m not so sure that’s going to happen! Anyone willing to put some $$$ on it? (Damn, are they going to insult me about gambling now too?)

    Comment by Stephen Dyrgas — July 23, 2007 @ 8:38 pm | Reply

  176. Um, I won’t take that bet… We did a lab experiment. We took an equal mass of aluminum foil comparable to the mass of a Republican Fascist, er I mean Baptist’s brain matter, and you know? We could not get even a firefly’s rear end to short circuit! Your money is safe. By the way.. is there a toll for the Dyrgas gate to hell?? I’m planning next years vacation. 😀

    Comment by qaeria — July 23, 2007 @ 9:24 pm | Reply

  177. Qaeria: They lack the mental capacity to learn from the Bible most times. For example, ignorance is not biblical, neither is mass murder (or the wishing thereof), hating those you don’t agree with isn’t good, the name-calling isn’t very nice (I’ve collected nicknames that amount to the Liberal Heathen Feminazied Werewolf-ish Witch that is really a demon-possessed little kid fighting for her spiritual life thanks to Crockett), math is not evil, racism isn’t cool either, etc, etc….There are many things that they missed in the Bible. And they are literalists (I think…when they want to be) when it comes to a book famous for symbolism and metaphorical speech. Then they only like the KJV because it is supposedly untouched by man…forgetting that it was written in Hebrew/Greek/had to be flippin’ translated. Yeah, there’s a lot of issues here, but it makes me laugh.
    Oh, and I’m from the South.

    If you want it for America as a whole, the average education level is the 8th grade…while India is a four-year college degree. Isn’t that sad?

    No “$$$.” I’m a broke teenager.🙂 When Brownback finally drops out what do you think these people are going to do?

    Comment by La Mona — July 23, 2007 @ 9:33 pm | Reply

  178. […] Extremism… Even our Side has it. Recently, I started commenting on an Ultra Right wing Republican-Baptist site regarding their views on my Country;  Canada.  Now I can put up with the usual stuff about the snow, hockey and beer, however these nuts figure […]

    Pingback by Religious Extremism… Even our Side has it. « all the muck that’s fit to make. — July 23, 2007 @ 10:56 pm | Reply

  179. When Brownback drops out, it’ll be hilarious. The events will unfold thusly: his campaign policies will start getting weirder, and the bloggers here will start saying things like “If he loses” or “If he is forced to drop out”. Then you’ll see that they start blaming everything but themselves for it: Darwinists, witches (like Gaines-Crockett), Leftists of all stripes… it will be all their fault, and no fault will go to the fact that his supporters are really about four dozen people.

    Comment by Adam Nelson — July 24, 2007 @ 8:00 am | Reply

  180. La Mona.

    What separates their name calling from mine, is that I derive my comments from available facts and put them forth with timing and wit. I do not hate them, nor anyone on this planet. With you being from the South, my apologies if you took offence, however I can demonstrate that I can play the stereotype game too.

    The main goal is to inspire their passions, and encourage a well thought out response, even if scripture is the relevant material to draw from.

    In the end it is to be fun, in my opinion. I want to win and lose discussions to help me learn, and also better understand my fellow man. Adam said it beautifully on Comment 51 or so. We appreciate these guys for thier ability to maintain a position, and speak their minds because of it.

    The joy of being such close neighbours is that we can celebrate our differences. Americans do certain things that anger Canadians, and vice versa. These forums allow one to vent frustrations, and encourage dialogue. For issues where mass destruction and hate spew forth, one cannot expect the other side to sit idly by. If you poke a hornet’s nest, you’re gonna get stung.

    Again, no offense intended to you personally. I was merely retaliating with available weaponry. If I’m a mossehumping. pot smoking lefty who says aboot all the time, who’s to say I can’t make generalizations as well?

    Comment by qaeria — July 24, 2007 @ 9:38 am | Reply

  181. I know, I know… Moose-Humping. There… spelled correctly.

    Comment by qaeria — July 24, 2007 @ 9:58 am | Reply

  182. Qaeria: I was listing all the sterotyping/assumption/labels/”logic” they’ve tossed at me. And how they can’t even follow the bible much of the time. (it wasn’t against you…sorry if it came out wrong.) And yea, when I insult them it has a foundation…mostly built from their ignorance. I didn’t take offense–just thought I’d mention that some aren’t idiots. I can play their game too. It’s fun when all else is out the window. And yea, it’s great that they’re at least somewhat consistent.

    Well, my “moose-humping pot smoking lefty” I commend thee on your collection of nicknames. They make me laugh. (the names they give people…)

    -“The Liberal Heathen Feminazied Werewolf-ish Witch”

    Comment by La Mona — July 24, 2007 @ 2:27 pm | Reply

  183. Actually, I haven’t been blessed with a nickname from TD Gaines Crockett yet… I simply chose at random the various things said about my countrymen. I like yours though.

    Comment by qaeria — July 24, 2007 @ 3:12 pm | Reply

  184. Well the posters here who have clearly made their statemts and points with clear agurments and facts have presented a great side of a debate. It was great reading from qaeria, Adam Nelson, La Mona and Stephen Dyrgas. The extreme right has offered no solid counter argument, their weak attempt at it was simply intults and threats. Gaines-Crockett even went as far as threatening Demockracy. Perhaps one day they will one day learn the art of debate and manage to form well based arguemnts of their own. That would require reading and understanding a variety of texts including the bible. Steven Dyrgas I’m with you on that bet however.🙂

    Comment by thebomb — July 24, 2007 @ 3:26 pm | Reply

  185. We’re glad you enjoy our blog and the discussions we have here, thebomb. It’s always nice to get positive feedback.

    Thanks!

    Comment by Psycheout — July 24, 2007 @ 3:31 pm | Reply

  186. So far my nicknames have been as follows:

    “thebozo” – Psycheout
    “left-wing atheist” – Psycheout

    Comment by thebomb — July 24, 2007 @ 3:35 pm | Reply

  187. Psycheout, yes you have all been entertaining. And I hope that one day we can acutally have intelligent debate. It’s been fun.

    Comment by thebomb — July 24, 2007 @ 3:37 pm | Reply

  188. Why would you call me a “left-wing atheist?” That doesn’t make very much sense.

    Still I’m glad you enjoy the blog.

    Comment by Psycheout — July 24, 2007 @ 3:38 pm | Reply

  189. I was quoting you. You called me that some comments ago. Scroll up it’s still there.

    Comment by thebomb — July 24, 2007 @ 3:40 pm | Reply

  190. Oh, I see. When you said “my nicknames” I thought you were saying you came up with them and when you used my name in the list I thought it was an association list, as in what your nicknames were for the following people.

    I get it. Well, I hope your feelings weren’t hurt too badly. Maybe you should talk to your mommy and she’ll wipe your eyes and help you blow your nose and tell you about sticks and stones and how they won’t break your bones. Or whatever.

    I always forget how emotional and fragile liberals are. I’m sorry, pookiekins.

    Comment by Psycheout — July 24, 2007 @ 3:56 pm | Reply

  191. Qaeria: Thanks.🙂 Crockett has been very generous to me. She never fails to come up with something that is–while creative–baseless. Right now I have been declared a poor demon-possessed child fighting for my spiritual life. And I would say you put those together quite well.

    Thebomb: Rightio. If they would only learn the Bible, Government, Politics, and Economics they would have a much stronger arguement…of course, if they understood those things well enough, would we still be here? Heehee.

    Psycheout: It’s amusing..can’t deny that. I don’t think you’ve hurt anyones’ feelings. …you’ve only reinforced many points previously made in this blog entry and others with yours and others’ blind insults. Oh, and I missed the part where being emotional and fragile were characteristics of a Liberal. I posted characteristics of Liberals before, remember? Also, I just finished an AP Gov’t and Politics course…I studied Liberal and Conservative thought well enough (even have a nice essay to go with it) and I missed this “emotional” and “fragile” deal. Hmmmm….

    Comment by La Mona — July 24, 2007 @ 4:52 pm | Reply

  192. La Mona, agreed. I’ve never met a Liberal who was emotional or fragile. Psycheout and Gaines-Crockett might have missed that because they have been trying everything to get under our skin and have been quite unsucessful. The people commenting contrary to the religions right have not really identified themselves as Liberals. However they have been posting with a clear head using reason, logic, and facts. You are a bright kid and your input is, if nothing else, more valid than anyone of theirs. The youth is the next generation to take the reins of this world and it is very refreshing to see young minds that think as yours does.🙂

    Psycheout yes you hurt me, well almost. Well not really at all. Amused me is more the term I’ve used. While creative your insults have been anything but accurate. I’m hardly an atheist and I only seem left wing because of the extremity of your views.

    Comment by thebomb — July 24, 2007 @ 5:24 pm | Reply

  193. Psycheout yes you hurt me….

    I know. And I apologized.

    the extremity of your views.

    I don’t view anything with my extremities. I see things with my eyes. You must be pretty weird looking if you see with your left wing extremities!

    Comment by Psycheout — July 24, 2007 @ 5:39 pm | Reply

  194. Psycheout yes I take what you say so seriosly. I should live my life by what you say and nothing else. You like to take peoples words and put a spin on them. It’s fine you’ve learned from those before you in the far right. Well if you can’t rebut what people say just post part of it with your own spin.

    Extrimty, def: the utmost or any extreme degree

    Comment by thebomb — July 24, 2007 @ 5:44 pm | Reply

  195. “Psycheout yes you hurt me….

    I know. And I apologized.”

    Read the rest of the passage. Even you should see the sarcasm…and if that’s not enough, “Well not really at all. Amused me is more the term I’ve used.”

    Also, you yourself said that English was the official language here. That considered, remember that in the English language many words have more than one meaning. Also, basic grammar will tell you the context in which thebomb’s “extremity” was used.

    Comment by La Mona — July 24, 2007 @ 5:56 pm | Reply

  196. C’mon… We have to give Psycheout a LITTLE credit. After-all, he at least has the intelligence to put a little spin on his “arguements” rather than stating how we will burn in hell, or spews epithets so vile it would make a trucker blush.

    I sense some potential in him, however I suspect he’s merely along for the ride, offering little tidbits of insight whenever he sees fit to. I anticipate one day, he shall impress us by sustaining a well researched debate.

    Also, hats off to your site for allowing arguments from both sides. Not many political / religious groups would withstand the abuse you guys get on a regular basis.

    I look forward to our next battle. Undoubtedly there will be a new controversy that will soon unite us all.

    Comment by qaeria — July 24, 2007 @ 6:02 pm | Reply

  197. Wow,
    I didn’t know there was so much prejudice from so called biblical people.
    Open your eyes.

    Comment by Jordan Graham — July 24, 2007 @ 7:37 pm | Reply

  198. Qaeria is a terrorist!😛

    Comment by Demockracy — July 25, 2007 @ 10:03 am | Reply

  199. Jordan,
    I agree… though most dont see it, america is full of us supposedly bible thumpers, and those that are… are normallly hypocritical… i can speak on this with first hand experience as one in my family is one of these notorious bible thumpers and such… but still… its not just in america with the bible thumpers… its everywhere… you’ll find prejudice in every little state, town, province, city… where ever you may be… I’ve just been sitting back and watching this arguement run loose and through so many topics, and now that its died down, i think i’ll actually say something that i’ve noticed… and thats probably been pointed out repeatedly just under different terms… no offense to anyone… if there happens to be such an offense in my words hereafter… but seriously guys… why do you bash your own country men, your neighbors and the like? What happened to all the open minded people? I mean if you can sit here and say you are always right and everyone around you is wrong… then you yourself is hypocritical… because noone is completely perfect… not even god… but thats religion and right now i’m on politics… even though i hate poitics with a passion… i could not refrain from saying that… Tell me.. does it give you a big head to think you are better than someone else? well i’m done… i’m just going to close my lips on the string of words i wish to say next, but since this debate is over anyway, i will refrain from it.

    *Note* i chose not to state any names, though those of you that actually paid attention know the ones i am talking to

    Comment by KitnZslv — July 25, 2007 @ 10:07 am | Reply

  200. you all are VERY christian! im sure jesus is proud, just like he’s proud of hitler.. and bush..

    Comment by Demockracy — July 25, 2007 @ 10:13 am | Reply

  201. Yea I’m sure Christ is proud of all those who carry out mass genocide in his name.🙂

    Comment by thebomb — July 25, 2007 @ 1:23 pm | Reply

  202. KitnZslv, I understand what you are saying. I think a lot of it is people trying to present a counter argument. I never said I was right and the only point of view to follow. The problem is this never turned into a debate. The arguments were one sided and the responses were just insults and threats. I agree that no one person is right. The best possible situation is a collaboration of ideas from everyone. Thats what democracy is supposed to be. However with some groups, and I’m not saying it’s only one, people tend to beilieve their own views are the only one that should be followed. And yes there are “bible thumpers” in every town in North America and for the most part the world. A little more tollerence from them and everyone else however would go a long way.

    Comment by thebomb — July 25, 2007 @ 1:43 pm | Reply

  203. further to thebomb’s point, We covered in several comments that we do in fact respect the “Other” side’s right to think what they will. The comments escalated by me in the hopes of awakening passion, and to encourage debate. It is nobody’s business what my views are. I love to debate… I’ll pick a side and then take it even if I don’t personally agree with the side I have chosen.

    I don’t want to change what they think… that is for them to do individually, and it is not me or anyone to say what exactly is right or wrong. I’m simply trying to take a polar opposite side, and see what happens.

    Comment by qaeria — July 25, 2007 @ 2:09 pm | Reply

  204. I Say Retarded!

    Comment by KnightX — July 25, 2007 @ 3:31 pm | Reply

  205. In Other Words “Stupid People Shouldnt Breed”

    Comment by KnightX — July 25, 2007 @ 4:11 pm | Reply

  206. Thanks for sharing, KnightX. Also, for proving your own point.

    Comment by Sisyphus — July 27, 2007 @ 10:52 am | Reply

  207. Looks like Sisyphus is too busy dreaming of people having sex with monkeys to bother with this thread anymore.

    Comment by Adam Nelson — July 29, 2007 @ 10:36 am | Reply

  208. Just as a poll: what are the IQ’s of people in here? Don’t exaggerate too far to either end, please.

    [Ed Note: Why do you keep changing your name, Nathan?]

    Comment by neutral party — August 10, 2007 @ 10:19 pm | Reply

  209. I change my name because I enjoy going by different aliases to represent multiple sides of a point. And thanks for revealing my name, by the way. Since it’s been eight days and no one has said anything, I can only assume you feel attacked by my question. I want to make it perfectly clear that I wasn’t posing that as a rhetorical question or an attack on anyone in specific. I’m just curious, that’s all.

    Comment by neutronnate — August 18, 2007 @ 10:49 am | Reply

  210. The ori are the true and only gods. The book of origin should be the only book, it was written by the hand of gods the ori.

    Hallowed are the ori.
    Hallowed are the ones that walk in unison.

    If you do not fallow the word of the ori, then you shall parish in the planes of fire.

    Belief in the ori will garentee your assention to the spirit world.

    Comment by Prior of the Ori — January 24, 2008 @ 1:07 am | Reply

  211. […] Simply, because I’m Canadian! Alright, it may also have something to do with the fact that I made it known to them that I am opposed to their backward, extremist ideas. They are ruthless, religious fanatics who […]

    Pingback by Dyrgas Gate (To Hell)??? | stephendyrgas.com — July 16, 2011 @ 8:24 pm | Reply

  212. Your style is so unique in comparison to other folks I’ve read stuff from. Thanks for posting when you have the opportunity, Guess I’ll just book mark this blog.

    Comment by free xxx chat — July 16, 2013 @ 4:15 am | Reply

  213. hey there and thank you for your info – I’ve definitely picked
    up something new from right here. I did however expertise some technical points using this web site, as I experienced to reload the website a lot of times previous to I could get
    it to load correctly. I had been wondering if your web host is OK?
    Not that I am complaining, but slow loading instances times will
    very frequently affect your placement in google and could damage your high quality score if advertising
    and marketing with Adwords. Anyway I am adding this RSS
    to my email and can look out for much more of your respective exciting
    content. Ensure that you update this again very soon.

    Comment by novoline zocken — September 12, 2013 @ 9:12 pm | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: