Blogs 4 Brownback

July 7, 2007

Open Thread

Filed under: Open Thread — Sisyphus @ 6:39 am

I’m too tired to write about anything insightful, so the responsibility now rests on your shoulders, dear readers.

30 Comments »

  1. It is just another day, Sisyphus. The Liberals will wake up hating America, family values, and morality more than they did yesterday, while we are persecuted and nailed to the proverbial cross for taking a stand for what is righteous.

    Every morning while enjoying my coffee I just pray that when I glance out the window that our Lord Jesus Christ will be standing out there ready to carry me home. This old world just gets sicker and more depraved by the minute. Surely, the time is coming soon when He will have had enough and calls an end to it. I keep right on praying that it is soon.

    Comment by Mrs. T.D. Gaines-Crockett — July 7, 2007 @ 7:07 am | Reply

  2. Gaines-Crockett, that’s a very good reason why people like you can never be in charge of the world.

    I suggest that we talk about the war in Iraq and against Islam in general. I mentioned this briefly in another post, but I’d like to hear your thoughts on who is right: the Christians or Islam. Why?

    Comment by Adam Nelson — July 7, 2007 @ 8:03 am | Reply

  3. Mrs. Gaines-Crockett, you know that as you advance the word of the Lord and lead your life of piety you are already walking with Christ.

    Comment by Helen Bock — July 7, 2007 @ 8:12 am | Reply

  4. Thank you, Helen, your kind words are most appreciated. I must say that I have found you to be one of the most refreshing and rational people to join this, and my own, blog in some time. Surely the light of the Lord shines upon you always.

    Comment by Mrs. T.D. Gaines-Crockett — July 7, 2007 @ 8:20 am | Reply

  5. Would anyone like to comment on my post?

    Comment by Adam Nelson — July 7, 2007 @ 8:21 am | Reply

  6. Adam Nelson,

    There really isn’t anything to comment on. Once you said Christian and Islam the topic matter was settled. The latter is going to burn in Hell for their sins against God while the Christians will live forever with Christ in Glory.

    Comment by Mrs. T.D. Gaines-Crockett — July 7, 2007 @ 8:28 am | Reply

  7. But Islamists say the exact same thing about you. Doesn’t that distress you?

    Comment by Adam Nelson — July 7, 2007 @ 9:24 am | Reply

  8. Also, isn’t it a little disturbing that an entire group of people who vastly outnumber you want you dead for the exact same reasons that you want them dead?

    Comment by Adam Nelson — July 7, 2007 @ 9:27 am | Reply

  9. Oh, please. Now you are just being plain ridiculous. I couldn’t care less what the Islamists think of my faith or me personally, and neither should anyone else unless they are one of them! I have God and the USA Military on my side and that is everything I need to protect me against those sub-human pieces of trash.

    Comment by Mrs. T.D. Gaines-Crockett — July 7, 2007 @ 9:40 am | Reply

  10. Brownback still holding strong at 3 percent?

    Comment by Salmo — July 7, 2007 @ 10:02 am | Reply

  11. Adam Nelson,

    Even Satan quoted Bible Scripture to tempt Jesus.

    Comment by Harry — July 7, 2007 @ 10:19 am | Reply

  12. I wish Crockett to explain herself with this “U.S.Ed” stuff. (I hate what I’ve read by the way.)

    Must leave, but I will return for this and whatever is in that other thread down there with my Psycheout buddy.

    Comment by La Mona — July 7, 2007 @ 10:32 am | Reply

  13. You may have seen this link in your stats page, but there is more trash-talkin of B4B out there.

    http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=2549293

    Comment by ChenZhen — July 7, 2007 @ 10:41 am | Reply

  14. Gaines-Crockett, it is not ridiculous to understand how your enemy thinks. On the contrary, understanding their motivations and causes could lead to a quicker conclusion to any war. Simply calling them subhuman scum only encourages them to fight harder and proves to them that you’re in fact the evil one.

    Willingly turning down information like that is, by the very definition of the word, ignorance.

    Comment by Adam Nelson — July 7, 2007 @ 10:41 am | Reply

  15. Islamists do not outnumber Christians, Mr. Nelson. The entire religion of Islam is outnumbered. After we finish converting China, that nation alone will have more Christians than there are Muslims in the entire world. God is with us in Scripture, and so are demographics on Earth.

    Comment by Sisyphus — July 7, 2007 @ 11:57 am | Reply

  16. He meant that they outnumber YEC ultra-fundies like Gaines-Crockett allegedly is.

    Comment by Linus — July 7, 2007 @ 12:05 pm | Reply

  17. Brownback still holding strong at 3 percent?

    I don’t know where you get that figure, but have you ever heard the story of the tortoise and the hare?

    Comment by Psycheout — July 7, 2007 @ 12:55 pm | Reply

  18. “I don’t know where you get that figure, but have you ever heard the story of the tortoise and the hare?”

    Ah, but everybody thought the hare would win. So if they had voted, he would have. This is an election, not a footrace involving a fast, but lazy and stupid animal.

    Comment by Salmo — July 7, 2007 @ 1:27 pm | Reply

  19. Oh, by the by, you guys accept Conservapedia for citations, right? I just want to ask before I cite something.

    Comment by Salmo — July 7, 2007 @ 1:29 pm | Reply

  20. Sorry, Sisyphus, but even if you count every Christian in the world, you are still vastly outnumbered by Islam. However, thats not the point.

    My point is that cultures fight for a reason. Islam hates you just as much as you hate them, and for all the exact same reasons.

    Comment by Adam Nelson — July 7, 2007 @ 2:35 pm | Reply

  21. Oh and by the way, you guys will be staring down China’s gun barrel soon enough. I speculate about four decades.

    Comment by Adam Nelson — July 7, 2007 @ 3:19 pm | Reply

  22. “Willingly turning down information like that is, by the very definition of the word, ignorance.”

    Ah, the foundation of all I find wrong here.

    Hey guys (Sisyphus mainly), Conservapedia says that the Roman Catholics have ONE BILLION members. The next two most populated Christian denominations add to be 377 million members (and neither is Southern Baptist/Baptist). Islam has 1.4 billion members. Considering that the top Christian denomination has less than Islam it can be concluded that yours does not beat the 1.4 billion of Islam. Now, if you count all Christian denominations then you can outnumber Islam, but considering the Catholics and Mormons are not considered Christians by many here you are down by one billion twelve million and five-hundred thousand people. Then taking into account that there are roughly 7 billion people on the planet minus those two groups and Islam AND 800 million for the Hindu you come to about 3.7 or 3.8 billion people left on the planet. Then knock off 4% of Americans, 17% of the British, and 32% of the French since that is about the percentage of Atheist. The remaining Christian denominations may come to just under 1 billion people (I’m being generous). Either way, the numbers suck for you.

    I would bring quotes, but that would be way too long. So, go to the site and search Islam, Christianity, Mormon, Hindu, Atheist, Religion and anything else that floats your boat.

    Comment by La Mona — July 7, 2007 @ 10:08 pm | Reply

  23. Wait, did you just cite Conservapedia? Why?

    Comment by Linus — July 8, 2007 @ 3:19 pm | Reply

  24. I like the duality between Conservapedia and this retarded blog. Conservapedia says they aren’t real, and the B4B “team” says Conservapedia isn’t real. Nope, God’s on America’s side!! Too bad that only about three dozen people are Americans, apparently.

    Comment by Adam Nelson — July 8, 2007 @ 3:41 pm | Reply

  25. I cited it because they supposedly accept what it says. They can’t argue with something that they said they agree with. ….well they can, and I’m sure they would, but that wouldn’t be helping them either.

    Here’s to the 36 Americans.

    Comment by La Mona — July 8, 2007 @ 8:34 pm | Reply

  26. Well, Conservapedia says this is a liberal parody site, so let’s just cite that, too.

    Comment by Salmo — July 9, 2007 @ 9:55 am | Reply

  27. And B4B says Conservapedia has been overrun by liberal infiltration-specialists. Oh, how convenient for you, B4B “team”. Sheesh, sometimes I wonder if these guys are even connected to reality at all.

    Comment by Adam Nelson — July 9, 2007 @ 12:40 pm | Reply

  28. “Islamists do not outnumber Christians, Mr. Nelson. The entire religion of Islam is outnumbered. After we finish converting China, that nation alone will have more Christians than there are Muslims in the entire world. God is with us in Scripture, and so are demographics on Earth.”

    There´s just one problem with that conversion: A communistic government and the biggest army on the planet. And enough nukes to kill half of the USA´s population.

    “Oh and by the way, you guys will be staring down China’s gun barrel soon enough. I speculate about four decades.”

    Either that or the country goes broke because the dollar is replaced by the Euro as world´s leading currency.

    Consevapedia is funny as this site. I love such good comedy, even if it´s unintentional.

    Comment by PG — July 9, 2007 @ 12:43 pm | Reply

  29. Unintentional makes it even funnier, even if you have to cringe at the pure stupidity every now and then.

    “There´s just one problem with that conversion: A communistic government and the biggest army on the planet. And enough nukes to kill half of the USA´s population.”

    That’s a vast understatement, PG. Not only is China’s army far bigger than the US’s, but they’re also pretty much just as advanced. In fact, their MiGs and Su’s, while being 15 year old Russian models, are still far superior to F-22s and America’s leading hardware. Also, they have enough nukes to destroy the whole WORLD, let alone America. And they’re a lot less edgy about actually using them.

    Comment by Adam Nelson — July 9, 2007 @ 2:46 pm | Reply

  30. @Adam: Actually, the chinese don´t have enough nukes to blow the planet. That “honor” goes to USA and Russia only. The Chinese strategical nuclear doctrine is basically to have just enough nuclear firepower to make anyone trying to mess with them think about that two or three times. (Afaik something like 500 nukes mostly on mobile ICBM´s.)

    But yeah about the technological level. Especially as the US Air FOrce would face top-notch phased radar arrays and modern SAM´s, turning stealth aircraft into flying deathtraps.

    Comment by PG — July 11, 2007 @ 9:39 am | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: