Blogs 4 Brownback

June 8, 2007

Israel, Betrayed!

Filed under: Breaking News,Defending America,Terrorism — Sisyphus @ 4:19 pm

Olmert wants to cede the Golan Heights!

Yediot Ahronot said Prime Minister Ehud Olmert recently sent messages to Syrian President Bashar Assad through German and Turkish diplomats saying Israel was open to direct peace negotiations and to give up the strategic plateau it seized in the 1967 Mideast war.

The paper said Syria had not responded to the overture, quoting unidentified officials close to Olmert.

Olmert’s office would not comment on the report. But an Israeli official said earlier in the week that Israel had been taking soundings on Syria’s intentions through an undisclosed third party. That official agreed to discuss the matter only if not quoted by name.

Israel has elected its Benedict Arnold to the highest office. America, as sorry as our plight may seem under the Democrat insurgents in Congress, is still not in such a place. This is like President Pelosi wanting to cede the state of Maine to Osama Bin Laden. Or Bush letting the Democrats pull our troops out of Iraq, abandoning our noble allies to a sordid fate.

One can only hope that concerned Israeli citizens will take to the streets to make sure this madness does not ensue. An Israel without the Golan Heights is like a man who’s sold his soul to Satan: perhaps healthy and alive for a short time, but in the long run doomed to ultimate eradication and perdition. I give Israel 5 years to survive this loss, give or take. Hezbollah will enjoy using it as a new launch pad, and Syria will soon overrun northern Israel. Olmert is destroying his nation. I hope he enjoys the legacy he’ll enjoy among those forced to reap the fruits of his betrayal.

41 Comments »

  1. Well, I can´t remember the USA having occupied Maine while it´s under international law property of bin Laden.

    And well, after Bush´s gone, the troops will go rather fast, too.

    Oh, and of course, Syria is only getting the HEights if they cease to help Hezbollah. So it´d be rather a setback for those lunies.

    (And hey, after all we got some germans watching that noone smuggels in weapons via sea. Now with Syria denying supplies, I can see Hezbollah running out of ammo.)

    Comment by PG — June 8, 2007 @ 4:30 pm | Reply

  2. Wow, some quotes from your link:

    JERUSALEM –
    Israel has told Syrian leaders it is willing to give up the captured Golan Heights as part of a peace deal that would require
    Syria to distance itself from
    Iran’s virulently anti-Israel regime, a newspaper reported Friday.

    Yediot said !President Bush! gave Olmert the green light for negotiations with Syria in an hourlong phone conversation last month. The two leaders plan further discussions during their scheduled meeting at the White House on June 19, it said.

    Comment by PG — June 8, 2007 @ 4:34 pm | Reply

  3. “!President Bush! gave Olmert the green light for negotiations with Syria”

    Notice that it doesn’t say he gave Olmert the green light to surrender to Syria. That is what Olmert has done. He has surrendered like a Frenchman. Like a particularly cowardly Frenchman, even.

    Comment by DPS — June 8, 2007 @ 4:37 pm | Reply

  4. Like a french treefrog faced off against a german shephard.

    Comment by ec1009 — June 8, 2007 @ 4:41 pm | Reply

  5. And what? It´s a desert. A piece of sand and rocks occupied against international law decades ago. What´s the value of it? Compared to the value of having Hezbollah cut off from their supply routes?

    And it´s called negotiations. It includes being ready to sacrifice something.

    PS: Just leave the frenchies alone, mkay? Actually, they only surrendere to Germany when the whole thing was over anyways. And then they caused a lot of new problems. Ever heard of the Resistancé?

    Comment by PG — June 8, 2007 @ 4:46 pm | Reply

  6. Israel annexed the Golan Heights from Syria in 1981. Not surprisingly, this is the same year Saint Reagan ascended to the throne and everything was good in the world. What this tells me is we need to pull the troops out of Iraq and bring them back home to fight a more important war. I’m talking about the War on Christmas. As Christmas and the story of Our Savior’s birth weakens, so too does Bethlehem and Jerusalem and Israel. We need to make this priority number 1. Brownback would do it. I know he would. Then we can go back teaching those Iraqis not to attack God’s country.

    Comment by Cletus — June 8, 2007 @ 4:57 pm | Reply

  7. Olmert should run for the Democratic nomination for US President. He’d fit in perfectly.

    Comment by DPS — June 8, 2007 @ 5:46 pm | Reply

  8. Israel can give the Golan Heights away? I thought God gave that to them in 1967, since when do you give God’s gifts away? We need Sam in the Whitehouse NOW to stop this nonsense.
    Olmert is a French name, ins’t it?

    Comment by BJ Tabor — June 8, 2007 @ 8:02 pm | Reply

  9. BJ Tabor
    You’ve got a firm grasp of this issue. I think Olmert is an Italian/ Sicilian name though… It refers to a yellowdog who has broken Omerta if I’m not correct.

    Comment by carsick — June 8, 2007 @ 10:22 pm | Reply

  10. “And what? It´s a desert. A piece of sand and rocks occupied against international law decades ago. What´s the value of it? Compared to the value of having Hezbollah cut off from their supply routes?”

    Strategic location, for starters.

    “Just leave the frenchies alone, mkay? Actually, they only surrendere to Germany when the whole thing was over anyways. And then they caused a lot of new problems. Ever heard of the Resistancé?”

    All five of them.

    “What this tells me is we need to pull the troops out of Iraq and bring them back home to fight a more important war. I’m talking about the War on Christmas.”

    We fight that war ourselves, fighting it here in America so our troops don’t have to fight it in their bases and Humvees.

    “Olmert should run for the Democratic nomination for US President. He’d fit in perfectly.”

    His first day in office Canada would get Minnesota, Hawaii would get independence, and Osama Bin Laden would get an entry visa.

    Comment by Sisyphus — June 9, 2007 @ 4:42 am | Reply

  11. Strategic location, for starters.

    For what? I don´t think the Syrians will be crazy enough to attack Israel in the first place. Not with the Israelis having nukes and US Forces right around the corner.

    All five of them.

    I know some more. Especially as they were crucial for Operation Overlord. Cutting com-lines and such stuff. Helping Airborne that had been dropped in the wrong place. And so on. Oh, and of course, there were the exiled french forces under DeGaulle. Quite a nice bunch. Without them, chances are that the Allies in Italy would have been stuck at the Gustav Line till 45.

    We fight that war ourselves, fighting it here in America so our troops don’t have to fight it in their bases and Humvees.

    Because those troops have other worries. Like that IED that possibly explodes any moment.

    Comment by PG — June 9, 2007 @ 7:24 am | Reply

  12. “You’ve got a firm grasp of this issue. I think Olmert is an Italian/ Sicilian name though… It refers to a yellowdog who has broken Omerta if I’m not correct.”

    The Italian, if figures. The Italians were the only country to be defeated by both sides in WWII.

    Comment by BJ Tabor — June 9, 2007 @ 8:01 am | Reply

  13. “Israel can give the Golan Heights away? I thought God gave that to them in 1967, since when do you give God’s gifts away?”

    Sadly, God granted Israel the land in fee simple with no conditions. Israel has full title and can sell or give the land away as they see fit. In retrospect I beleive God would have just leased them the land.

    Comment by ec1009 — June 9, 2007 @ 8:08 am | Reply

  14. “Israel can give the Golan Heights away? I thought God gave that to them in 1967, since when do you give God’s gifts away?”

    Yeah, I was there, the Israelis laid the contract on the ground, then a lightning bolt struck the paper and the name YHVA (in Hebrew) was burned on the dotted line!

    Comment by Skeptic — June 9, 2007 @ 8:37 am | Reply

  15. Skeptic @ 14:

    “Yeah, I was there, the Israelis laid the contract on the ground, then a lightning bolt struck the paper and the name YHVA (in Hebrew) was burned on the dotted line!”

    Wow! I had no idea that had happened! I don’t see how you can still be an atheist after hearing about something like that.

    Comment by DPS — June 9, 2007 @ 8:50 am | Reply

  16. Skeptic probably thought the lightning bolt just evolved itself on the paper. What a naive dumbass.

    Comment by ec1009 — June 9, 2007 @ 9:07 am | Reply

  17. Well, actually, I never heard this, I pretty much made up the most ridiculous thing I could think of, as a joke (the God I know from the New Testament would never choose sides in on of mankind’s many trivial conflicts, to an omnipotent being the Israelis and Palestinians are but squabbling children.)

    Comment by Skeptic — June 9, 2007 @ 9:09 am | Reply

  18. “Well, actually, I never heard this, I pretty much made up the most ridiculous thing I could think of, as a joke (the God I know from the New Testament would never choose sides in on of mankind’s many trivial conflicts, to an omnipotent being the Israelis and Palestinians are but squabbling children.)”

    Why do you backtrack once you’ve been called out on the truth? A miracle happened, you refused to see it, and when people try to point out its miraculousness to you you immediately pretend you made the whole thing up. Why? Why are you so afraid to embrace God? Why do you hate yourself so thoroughly?

    Comment by Sisyphus — June 9, 2007 @ 9:46 am | Reply

  19. I thought we already gave Maine to the terrorists?

    And New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New York, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Delaware, Maryland, Michigan, Illinois, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Washington, Oregon, California and Hawaii.

    Comment by Onan — June 9, 2007 @ 10:00 am | Reply

  20. “Why do you backtrack once you’ve been called out on the truth? A miracle happened, you refused to see it, and when people try to point out its miraculousness to you you immediately pretend you made the whole thing up. Why? Why are you so afraid to embrace God? Why do you hate yourself so thoroughly?”

    No, I really made it up.

    Read my other comments on this website, enjoy the sarcasm!

    Comment by Skeptic — June 9, 2007 @ 10:08 am | Reply

  21. Why do you backtrack once you’ve been called out on the truth? A miracle happened, you refused to see it, and when people try to point out its miraculousness to you you immediately pretend you made the whole thing up. Why? Why are you so afraid to embrace God? Why do you hate yourself so thoroughly?

    Sisiphus, please get a dictionary and look under sarcasm.

    Comment by PG — June 9, 2007 @ 10:10 am | Reply

  22. I thought we already gave Maine to the terrorists?”

    Not officially. Real Americans can still move up there and claim it back.

    “No, I really made it up.”

    I don’t believe you. I believe you witnessed a miracle, and refuse to acknowledge it. You sadden me immensely.

    “Sisiphus, please get a dictionary and look under sarcasm.”

    Sarcasm can’t obliterate the miraculous, PG-13.

    Comment by Sisyphus — June 9, 2007 @ 10:38 am | Reply

  23. “I don’t believe you. I believe you witnessed a miracle, and refuse to acknowledge it. You sadden me immensely.”

    Dude, I made it up, okay?

    I wasn’t even born back then!

    Comment by Skeptic — June 9, 2007 @ 11:09 am | Reply

  24. Praise the Lord we have someone with a stong backbone and a good Christian faith like Sam Brownback willing to take the baton from Bush in 2008. All of those poor people in Israel persecuted by those Godless infidels. I pray regularly that Bush will help get that mess straightened out and soon so the masses can see the Holy Land one more time before the Father comes to bring us all home.

    Come soon, Father! Come quick!

    Comment by Mrs. T.D. Gaines-Crockett — June 9, 2007 @ 11:49 am | Reply

  25. “Come soon, Father! Come quick!”

    My child, your Father’s busy right now, I’m filling in for him, I’ll be hearing your prayers, till Tuesday.

    Comment by Satan — June 9, 2007 @ 12:17 pm | Reply

  26. Sarcasm is unGodly and I am sure that Sisyphus would never engage in it nor should he permit it on his blog. Sarcasm leads to irony which leads to sodomy which leads to treason which leads to eternal damnation. It is a gateway sin developed by one of Satan’s original improv demons.

    Comment by ec1009 — June 9, 2007 @ 12:55 pm | Reply

  27. For the benefit of the uninformed, improv demons also known as improvisational demons got there start shortly after God cast out Satan to the depth of hell for his insolence. Satan, already condemned for being a smartass, compounded his crimes against God by forming “The Second Kingdom Improvisational Group.”

    They continue to spread sin to this day. These demons were the inventers of what we know today as sarcasm, irony, satire, parody, nuance, slapstick, the pratfall, the first knock knock joke, cross dressing and sodomy.

    Please know the source before engaging in any of these activities. Consider yourselves warned. What you do with your eternal soul is no longer my concern.

    Comment by ec1009 — June 9, 2007 @ 1:25 pm | Reply

  28. “Sarcasm leads to irony which leads to sodomy which leads to treason which leads to eternal damnation. It is a gateway sin developed by one of Satan’s original improv demons.”

    Damn right!

    Muhahahaha!

    Comment by Satan — June 9, 2007 @ 1:33 pm | Reply

  29. “Sarcasm is unGodly and I am sure that Sisyphus would never engage” ec1009

    Sarcasm is not something Sam would do, and that is another reason why Sisyphus never stops to it.

    Comment by BJ Tabor — June 9, 2007 @ 1:53 pm | Reply

  30. “I wasn’t even born back then!”

    Surely that just makes it more miraculous?

    Comment by Onan — June 9, 2007 @ 2:16 pm | Reply

  31. The poster known as Satan can laugh now – but when he finds himself impeded with a spit and roasting over hot coals at Lucifer’s Bar & Grill he’ll not find it so funny.

    The door’s open, Jesus! Come on in!

    Comment by Mrs. T.D. Gaines-Crockett — June 9, 2007 @ 2:24 pm | Reply

  32. “The poster known as Satan can laugh now – but when he finds himself impeded with a spit and roasting over hot coals at Lucifer’s Bar & Grill he’ll not find it so funny.”

    Why would I want to roast myself in my own establishment?

    Comment by Satan — June 9, 2007 @ 3:02 pm | Reply

  33. Because it would be ironic and you just LOOOve irony don’t you Satan. You bastard.

    Comment by ec1009 — June 9, 2007 @ 5:16 pm | Reply

  34. I think I’ll allow Satan’s post to stand. At least they’re flagrantly evil, which is more than you can say for the average moonbat poster here, who is Satan’s unwitting servant.

    Comment by Sisyphus — June 9, 2007 @ 7:00 pm | Reply

  35. “I think I’ll allow Satan’s post to stand.”

    A wise decision, Sysiphus…

    Comment by Satan — June 10, 2007 @ 10:03 am | Reply

  36. If we fight Satan here, we won’t have to fight him at home.

    Comment by DPS — June 10, 2007 @ 5:13 pm | Reply

  37. “Because it would be ironic and you just LOOOve irony don’t you Satan. You bastard.”

    I guess you’re right, I should try it once, just for the sake of it!

    “If we fight Satan here, we won’t have to fight him at home.”

    My minions are everywhere!

    Muhahaha!

    Comment by Satan — June 11, 2007 @ 8:59 am | Reply

  38. We should fight Satan everywhere. I don’t get what is supposed to be ironic about that statement.

    Cursed be Satan and blessed be Jesus and his loyal servant Sam Brownback.

    Comment by ec1009 — June 11, 2007 @ 7:41 pm | Reply

  39. Mr. Brownback, I have plans for him…

    Muhahaha!

    Comment by Satan — June 12, 2007 @ 11:21 am | Reply

  40. “If we fight Satan here, we won’t have to fight him at home.”

    Exactly.

    “Muhahaha!”

    Get thee behind us, Satan!

    Comment by Sisyphus — June 12, 2007 @ 11:27 am | Reply

  41. The full CATHERINE BERTINI quote is as follows.

    Let’s have no illusions. We can’t easily change the underlying beliefs
    and prejudices that do so much damage to women worldwide. We cannot
    quickly change attitudes, but we can change behaviour. At the World Food
    Programme we have recognized what a valuable tool food aid can be in
    changing behaviour. In so many poorer countries food is money, food is
    power. In some of our most successful food aid projects, we literally
    pay families who do not believe in educating their daughters to send
    those girls to school. A little free cooking oil can go a long way. We
    trade a 5 litre can of oil for 30 days of school attendance by a young
    girl. Yes, it’s bribery. We don’t apologize for that. We are changing
    behaviour, we are giving hope and opportunity to young girls -and that
    is all that counts. Each small change in behaviour will one day pay off
    in a change in attitude.

    Comment by Steven M — April 23, 2009 @ 7:11 pm | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: