Blogs 4 Brownback

June 6, 2007

Give Them All the Nukes They Want

Filed under: Defending America,Election 2008,RINOs,Sam Brownback,Terrorism — Sisyphus @ 5:15 am

One issue the Republicans generally agreed on last night was doing whatever it takes to keep Iran from getting nuclear weapons:

Republican candidates for U.S. president agreed on Tuesday that Iran must not develop atomic weapons even if a tactical nuclear strike is needed to stop it and accused Democrats of being soft on the issue.

I think that’s the right position to take. But I think we should give Iran as many nukes as it can take. We have 3,500 of them, right? We can easily spare 500 or so to crater the whole country, and still keep thousands more to show the rest of the world we mean business.

Senator Brownback agrees with me, although of course he can’t use precise statistics or list targets:

“Iran is the lead sponsor of terrorism,” Brownback said. “Ahmadinejad just this past week called for the destruction of Israel, continues to call for attacking of the United States. I think we have to confront them aggressively for what they are, which is the lead sponsor of terrorism in the world. I think we need to push the sanctions forward more aggressively. And I think we have to show that purpose and resolve — that we’re going to confront these guys, and we’re going to stand with our allies like Israel, we’re going to stand against them oppressing and pushing us and trying to fund terrorists against us.”

It’s nice to know the grown-ups are going to stay in charge through 2009. I can’t imagine what Hillary Clinton or John Edwards would do in a situation like this. Cede Iran Hawaii, maybe, and pray that they wouldn’t frighten the rest of us if we appeased them. Democrats are sickening cowards. Republicans understand that bullies only understand force. If Iran wants nuclear weapons, I say we give it to them. When they understand the proposal, maybe they’ll think twice about the request.

UPDATE: Why we fight.

Iran has not yet crossed the threshold of being able to make nuclear weapons but may be only two years away, Israeli ambassador Sallai M. Meridor said Wednesday.

“I really think they are on the verge of getting the genie out of the bottle, and leaving our children with a nightmare,” the Israeli envoy said at a news conference at the Council on Foreign Relations, a private think tank.

If we don’t stop them now, they’ll stop us later. I don’t want to die so that Iran can enslave the world and raise our surviving, mutated descendents to be Fascist Muslims; apparently, you treefrogs have no problem with that.

59 Comments »

  1. Oh, you want to nuke Iran? Your religion must really be a religion of peace!

    Comment by littleandy — June 6, 2007 @ 5:24 am | Reply

  2. LOL, the death cult called “Islam” is the so-called “religion of pieces.” The fact that you would make a moral equivalence to Christ’s Country (the United States of America) pre-emptively slaughering perhaps millions of innocent women and children all for Richard Cheney and Sam Brownback’s political glory, and the acts of subhuman Muslims PROVES that you hate America, Israel, and the white-Christian-male power structure that has served God’s land for the past 6,000 years. If the United States of America choses to nuke the Islamosocialists in Iran, that is the true will of God LOL.

    Everyone knows that.

    Comment by St. Legalize — June 6, 2007 @ 7:01 am | Reply

  3. These mullah would behead us all if they could. And if we don’t stop them, frankly, the might. They hate us because of our freedoms.

    If we have to nuke them to stop them from beheading us all…then so be it.

    Comment by Jeff Davis — June 6, 2007 @ 7:44 am | Reply

  4. littleandy,
    It’s not that we WANT to bomb Iran. They clearly are ASKING FOR IT and being good Samaritan types we will simply fulfill their wish.

    Comment by carsick — June 6, 2007 @ 7:46 am | Reply

  5. “It’s not that we WANT to bomb Iran. ”

    Exactly. Iran is like a misbehaving child. We don’t WANT to spank them, but it’s for their own good. By experiencing total annihilation, maybe they’ll learn a lesson.

    Comment by Fascinated and Confused — June 6, 2007 @ 8:18 am | Reply

  6. I wouldn’t waste precious bombs on them, we’re gonna need em in our inevitable war with the pinko soy-fairies of Vermont.

    Iran will be a softer target. If we follow the plan of deporting all the homos we capture from the USRV, we can probably just wipe them out with the AIDs.

    Comment by Winged Crusader — June 6, 2007 @ 8:28 am | Reply

  7. No one wants to bomb Iran — the question is do we have the guts to anyway if it’s clear that’s the only way forward?

    Comment by Jeff Davis — June 6, 2007 @ 8:48 am | Reply

  8. Just stumbled upon this site. I must say, it’s a joy for me to know that the hugely numerous cerebrally-impaired rednecks (either in disguise or else) could also have someone to turn to when casting their ballot. I mean, it’s their right too, isn’t it?

    Comment by dilettante — June 6, 2007 @ 9:34 am | Reply

  9. How much longer do we have to put up with the Iranians pushing us and oppressing us? My patience is at an end. Don’t we have a right to defend ourselves, or do we just have to sit here like sitting ducks to make Michael Moore happy?

    Comment by DPS — June 6, 2007 @ 9:41 am | Reply

  10. Jeff Davis
    That’s why we support Senator Brownback. He has the guts! And with God on his righteous side who needs congressional go ahead? Not him!

    Comment by carsick — June 6, 2007 @ 9:43 am | Reply

  11. “And with God on his righteous side who needs congressional go ahead? Not him!”

    Why does the President need congressional approval after the way Iran attacked us on 911? No! The real question is why we have waited over six years to punish the 911 masterminds in Tehran.

    Comment by BJ Tabor — June 6, 2007 @ 9:55 am | Reply

  12. The only humane thing to do is to nuke Iran immediately. If we wait, their population will only grow, and we’ll end having to kill more of them. If we do it now, fewer people have to die. Why are Democrats so eager to maximize the bloodshed? Just get it over with, I say.

    Comment by DPS — June 6, 2007 @ 9:55 am | Reply

  13. “If we have to nuke them to stop them from beheading us all…then so be it.”

    Exactly. That’s exactly right.

    “Iran will be a softer target. If we follow the plan of deporting all the homos we capture from the USRV, we can probably just wipe them out with the AIDs.”

    That’s a good point. We could do that, but some homosexuals might avoid the trap. Meanwhile, I don’t think we can afford to take the risk of homosexual Iranians getting ahold of nuclear weapons. I think we need to take action immediately. DPS gets it right:

    “The only humane thing to do is to nuke Iran immediately.”

    Comment by Sisyphus — June 6, 2007 @ 10:16 am | Reply

  14. “Don’t we have a right to defend ourselves…”

    Has even one Iranian soldier set foot on American soil?
    No, but there are plenty of American soldiers in the Middle East and even some in Iran right now, so who’s the real bully here?

    “We can easily spare 500 or so to crater the whole country, and still keep thousands more to show the rest of the world we mean business.”

    Sure, wipe out mankind over a trivial conflict between two groups of retarded fundies, I’m sure you’ll go to heaven for that!

    Comment by Skeptic — June 6, 2007 @ 10:17 am | Reply

  15. carsick, BJ Tabor, and DPS are exactly correct. Senator Sam Brownback has the moral courage and clarity of thought and reason to understand that Iran simply can not go unpunished for their un-Christian (and therefore by definition, “un-American”) acts on the morning of September 11, 2001. When Christ sees fit to declare that Sam is the President of the United States of America, he shall need no Congressional approval to nuke Iran, Mecca, Moscow, or Paris – all hearts of evil and darkness, and all direct origins of the attacks that took down the Towers. So, it is clear to all civil and reasonable men that when God declares that justice will be had, Sam requires no Congressional approval to make sure that word is carried out. To think otherwise would be to deny the word of Christ, and thus by definition, such a lack of faith is worthy of fire and death, similar to that which the evil Muslims shall experience. Period. There is no debate about this.

    In response to DPS, I too wonder why the satanic lesbians in the Democrat party insist on making war instead of peace in the world. After all, Christ demands that in order to acheive peace, we must slaughter enough brown people to be deemed worthy. I can’t understand why the American communists, hippies, women, abortionists, secularists, persons of color, etc. do not admit this very plain fact; the only reasonable explanation for this is that they are too busy engaging in sodomy and smoking their drugs LOL!

    Comment by St. Legalize — June 6, 2007 @ 10:23 am | Reply

  16. St. Legalize @ 15:

    “we must slaughter enough brown people to be deemed worthy”

    I would say, “as many terrorists as necessary, of any color, in order to defend America and Western Civilization.”

    “they are too busy engaging in sodomy and smoking their drugs”

    You hit the nail on the head there!

    Comment by DPS — June 6, 2007 @ 10:54 am | Reply

  17. I say solve the problem once and for all…nuke all the stupid people.

    WOOT!@!

    Comment by Mrs Paisley, WoMP TFFC — June 6, 2007 @ 11:13 am | Reply

  18. We need to nuke Iran and nuke Iran NOW.

    Hundreds of thousands of Iranian Jihadis are going to Mexico and coming in through our southern border every day!

    In World War 2 we defeated Germany, and I am greatful that we do not have to speak German today. In the Cold War we defeated Russia, ensuring that we do not have to learn their very difficult language.

    Today we are under attack from Mexico and Iran! We must strike Iran first! Otherwise we will have to learn Spanish, or worse! We may have to pray to Mecca 5 times a day and learn Arabic!

    Why aren’t feminists at our southern border protesting the Islamic invasion and demanding that we nuke Iran? You would think that they would fear being made to wear burqas and be escorted everywhere by a male relative. They aren’t there because feminism is just a ruse. They hate America and will do anything to hurt it. Whether it’s murdering American babies through abortion or aiding Iran in conquering us through illegal immigration they do not care!

    Comment by America4Americans — June 6, 2007 @ 11:28 am | Reply

  19. “Sure, wipe out mankind over a trivial conflict between two groups of retarded fundies, I’m sure you’ll go to heaven for that!”

    This kind of alarmist rhetoric really isn’t helping things, Skeptic. Nuking Iran is not going to “wipe out mankind”, and any pretense otherwise is hysteria at its worst.

    “Today we are under attack from Mexico and Iran! We must strike Iran first! Otherwise we will have to learn Spanish, or worse! We may have to pray to Mecca 5 times a day and learn Arabic!”

    I like your post, but feel I should point out that Iranians speak Farsi. It’s even harder than Arabic, I’m told. I don’t want my children learning either language. Apart from languages useful for reading the Bible, I have no use for any language other than English.

    Comment by Sisyphus — June 6, 2007 @ 11:31 am | Reply

  20. Has even one Iranian soldier set foot on American soil?

    We don’t want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud.

    Comment by Jeff Davis — June 6, 2007 @ 11:32 am | Reply

  21. “Has even one Iranian soldier set foot on American soil?”

    They caught a guy from Hezbollah a couple years back. Hezbollah is the vanguard of the Iranian Army.

    Comment by Sisyphus — June 6, 2007 @ 11:59 am | Reply

  22. “Has even one Iranian soldier set foot on American soil?”

    I bet that a good portion of the 24 million illegals slinking about the United States of America are Iranian opperatives. That’s what makes their plotting so nefarious: we have no idea how many of them are already in this country, awaiting word from their fascist masters in the middle east. This fact alone proves that they must be forcefully stopped God willing. Next, return the United States of American to its intended glory – Christian theocracy. Finally: great profits for our Christian corporations; no others shall be permitted to operate at a profit. This is the only way to prevent the Iranian Islamo death cultists do not infiltrate our system, post Iranian nuclearized destruction (and hopefully (God willing) enhanced interrogation techniques utilized against any straglers).

    Comment by St. Legalize — June 6, 2007 @ 12:05 pm | Reply

  23. http://pressposts.com/Family/Give-Them-All-Nukes-They-Want/

    Submited post on PressPosts.com – “Give Them All the Nukes They Want”

    Trackback by PressPosts / User / orangebleu / Submitted — June 6, 2007 @ 12:31 pm | Reply

  24. Sisyphus, please do everyone in support of Brownback a favor and stick to delivering news bits and links from the pro-Brownback community. In case you haven’t noticed, you’re drawing a lot of fire–not all unwarranted. You’re the reason that I recently pulled Blogs4Brownback from my blogroll.

    I doubt that Brownback would support lobbing 3,000 nukes over to Iran. (At least I hope not.) It just doesn’t strike me as “pro-life, whole-life.”

    Sincere thanks for considering this message.

    Comment by Tyson — June 6, 2007 @ 1:10 pm | Reply

  25. Sisyphus my friend YOU’RE A GREAT AMERICAN !

    Keep up the good work.

    George

    Comment by Dumbya — June 6, 2007 @ 1:47 pm | Reply

  26. “Sisyphus, please do everyone in support of Brownback a favor and stick to delivering news bits and links from the pro-Brownback community. In case you haven’t noticed, you’re drawing a lot of fire–not all unwarranted. You’re the reason that I recently pulled Blogs4Brownback from my blogroll.”

    Who cares what you think, RINO? This is about defending America and securing the Presidency for Brownback, not winning a slot on your blogroll.

    Comment by Sisyphus — June 6, 2007 @ 2:04 pm | Reply

  27. If the other Brownback sites would just understand how it really works.
    Sisyphus posts about sending a big ol’ message to Iran and – presto bang-o – God delivers Iran its possibly first ever cyclone (re: hurricane).
    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070606/ap_on_re_mi_ea/cyclone_gonu_12;_ylt=AqZzQao9H05rPEw6lu8rhFME1vAI

    From b4b to God’s ears! The other Brownback supporters should stop being so sheepish and realize the power of the righteous sword that blogs4brownback has been swinging.
    Can they top a hurricane with their email lists and letters to the editor campaigns? I don’t think so!

    Comment by carsick — June 6, 2007 @ 2:18 pm | Reply

  28. “I doubt that Brownback would support lobbing 3,000 nukes over to Iran. (At least I hope not.) It just doesn’t strike me as “pro-life, whole-life.””

    Yes talk about a RHINO. Who in the heck wants a President who is so squemish he can’t order an attack on another nation when it is in the national instrests? One Jimmy Carter was enough for America.

    Comment by BJ Tabor — June 6, 2007 @ 2:22 pm | Reply

  29. Tyson @ 24:

    “I doubt that Brownback would support lobbing 3,000 nukes over to Iran. (At least I hope not.) It just doesn’t strike me as “pro-life, whole-life.”

    I don’t think this joker even knows who Senator Brownback is. The senator is a runaway freight-train, and he is going to crush all of you liberals and RINOs and terrorists and acupuncturists and shamans. If you can’t handle it, get out of the way.

    Comment by DPS — June 6, 2007 @ 3:57 pm | Reply

  30. JUST KILL THOSE IRANI BASTAERDS NUKE EM ALL TIL THEY G

    Comment by Jack Fremont — June 6, 2007 @ 3:58 pm | Reply

  31. “Those that most ardently favor war seldom have felt its bitter taste; rarely are they willing to perform the sacrifices they champion of others.”

    Comment by Ahab — June 6, 2007 @ 4:20 pm | Reply

  32. “This kind of alarmist rhetoric really isn’t helping things, Skeptic. Nuking Iran is not going to “wipe out mankind”, and any pretense otherwise is hysteria at its worst.”

    Are you sure? Cause 500 nukes is a lot, you know…

    Do you even know that there are millions of Iranians who want freedom, but are being supressed?
    How about supporting them, instead of mindless nuking?

    “We don’t want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud.”

    Sure, paranoia will solve all our problems!

    But, are you sure, the British aren’t plotting to invade? Or maybe the Canadians? Hey, maybe your own wive is a terrorist, better shoot her, just in case…

    “How much longer do we have to put up with the Iranians pushing us and oppressing us?”

    They have big mouths, that’s all, they do not and never will have the means to defeat the United States, Israel maybe, but not the Unites States.
    You’d know that if you only this much about the art of war (which you don’t, judging by your support of the Iraq war and the use of nuclear weapons.)

    “Those that most ardently favor war seldom have felt its bitter taste; rarely are they willing to perform the sacrifices they champion of others.”

    You take the words right out of my mouth!

    Sys and DPS, why don’t you ask the soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan what they think?

    Comment by Skeptic — June 6, 2007 @ 5:01 pm | Reply

  33. Jack!!!

    Comment by DPS — June 6, 2007 @ 5:02 pm | Reply

  34. You know, I’ve been thinking. Considering that we once had enough nuclear weapons to destroy the world twelve times over, I’m sure we still possess the capacity to turn the Middle East into a sheet of glass. Do you think it would be possible to build a protective “prayer shield” around Israel while we blanket the entire region in atomic fire? If we gathered together the holiest people in the world for the operation — Bush, Brownback, Dobson, Rudolph — I’d say there’s a good chance of at least protecting Israel’s financial assets from incineration.

    I don’t know; maybe I’m dreaming too big.

    Comment by Virginia Templeton — June 6, 2007 @ 5:09 pm | Reply

  35. Hi, Jack! We missed you!

    Comment by Sisyphus — June 6, 2007 @ 5:11 pm | Reply

  36. “Sys and DPS, why don’t you ask the soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan what they think?”

    That is so much like a liberal to hide behind the military.

    Comment by BJ Tabor — June 6, 2007 @ 5:26 pm | Reply

  37. “Why does the President need congressional approval after the way Iran attacked us on 911? No! The real question is why we have waited over six years to punish the 911 masterminds in Tehran.”

    I just have a gut feeling telling me it was the Australians, then again you can’t trust the Canadians either, maybe we should just nuke the whole world, that way we’re sure we got the ones responsible.

    Comment by Skeptic — June 6, 2007 @ 5:32 pm | Reply

  38. “I just have a gut feeling telling me it was the Australians, then again you can’t trust the Canadians either, maybe we should just nuke the whole world, that way we’re sure we got the ones responsible.”

    Osama Bin Laden has never been to either country. Nor did the CIA identify them as threats. In fact, they’re our allies, helping us out in Afghanistan and Iraq. They love America better than most American moonbats do. So lay off them.

    Comment by Sisyphus — June 6, 2007 @ 5:38 pm | Reply

  39. Osama Bin Laden has never been to Iran (or Iraq for that matter) either.

    Comment by Skeptic — June 6, 2007 @ 5:44 pm | Reply

  40. Sisyphus, I don’t know where else to turn…I accidentally touched my wife during her menstrual period. What do I do?

    Comment by SeekHim — June 6, 2007 @ 6:07 pm | Reply

  41. Skeptic @ 39:

    “Osama Bin Laden has never been to Iran (or Iraq for that matter) either.”

    How do you know? Are you Osama’s best buddy? Does he tell you everywhere he goes?

    Comment by DPS — June 6, 2007 @ 7:27 pm | Reply

  42. “How do you know? Are you Osama’s best buddy? Does he tell you everywhere he goes?”

    Good point DPS. I think we may have a real member of Al Quida here since he is so sure of Ben Landin movements in the past 10 years. We’ve been warned the Iranians have been sending them around websites to undermine the War on Terror.

    Comment by BJ Tabor — June 6, 2007 @ 7:37 pm | Reply

  43. Dude, Sisyphus… even if you’re a parody, this is sickening. Lay off it.

    Comment by Linus — June 6, 2007 @ 8:12 pm | Reply

  44. Apparently, it is now “sick” to want America to be a safe and godly nation.

    Comment by carsick — June 6, 2007 @ 9:19 pm | Reply

  45. What if the rapture comes before the ’08 election? Who should the rest of them vote for when Brownback’s gone?

    Comment by SeekHim — June 6, 2007 @ 9:37 pm | Reply

  46. Considering that we once had enough nuclear weapons to destroy the world twelve times over, I’m sure we still possess the capacity to turn the Middle East into a sheet of glass.

    Not sure I follow…does sand turn to glass under high temperatures? What impact would this have on the oil under the ground. Seriously…we don’t want to lose that stuff.

    Comment by Jeff Davis — June 6, 2007 @ 10:31 pm | Reply

  47. Yeah, right, nuke Iran. It will probably cause a global thermonuclear war, but hey, who cares if half the world goes boom?

    PS. You already blamed Afghanistan dn Iraq for 9/11. This excuse is used up.

    @DPS: Watch out with that freight-train rhetorics. Someone could simply blow up the rails.

    Comment by PG — June 7, 2007 @ 6:11 am | Reply

  48. PG
    What are “freight-train rhetorics”? Variations of hobo slang and pidgin english?

    Comment by carsick — June 7, 2007 @ 8:29 am | Reply

  49. “Someone could simply blow up the rails.”

    I do not understand your enthusiasm for terrorism.

    Comment by DPS — June 7, 2007 @ 9:34 am | Reply

  50. “Osama Bin Laden has never been to either country (Australia and Canada.)”

    How do you know? Are you Osama’s best buddy? Does he tell you everywhere he goes?

    Comment by Skeptic — June 7, 2007 @ 9:57 am | Reply

  51. Why haven’t we started killing these people yet? Don’t people realize our soldiers are dying every day at the hands of men they armed?

    Comment by Marcia P. — June 7, 2007 @ 3:25 pm | Reply

  52. Sisyphus, I don’t know where else to turn…I accidentally touched my wife during her menstrual period. What do I do?
    Comment by SeekHim — June 6, 2007 @ 6:07 pm

    Sisyphus, I’ll take this one if you don’t mind due to the urgency of the situation.

    Seekhim, run don’t walk to your medicine cabinet. Hopefully, it will be well stocked with a variety of liquid elixers. Find the the bottle marked scotch or gin. Pour yourself a healthy dose and turn on your television. I hope to God you have cable. If so, you should be able to find a NASCAR race. If not, rugby or football will do. Whatever you do, don’t watch tennis or soccer. It will only make things worse. Hope this helps Seekhim. Good luck and let me know how things turn out.

    Comment by ec1009 — June 7, 2007 @ 5:15 pm | Reply

  53. “Osama Bin Laden has never been to Iran (or Iraq for that matter) either.”

    How would you know? You’ve been following him around a lot, have you? I think the other commenters are right. We may have a Qaedist on our hands, here.

    “Why haven’t we started killing these people yet? Don’t people realize our soldiers are dying every day at the hands of men they armed?”

    I don’t know, Marcia. This bothers me a lot, too.

    “Sisyphus, I don’t know where else to turn…I accidentally touched my wife during her menstrual period. What do I do?”

    Well, you could do what ec1009 says. But if I were you, I’d probably cut my hand off. It’s the only way to show true repentance. Then again, you can rely on God’s forgiveness. Still, if it were me, I’d still cut my hand off, as the ultimate act of humility.

    Comment by Sisyphus — June 7, 2007 @ 5:24 pm | Reply

  54. “Sisyphus, I don’t know where else to turn…I accidentally touched my wife during her menstrual period. What do I do?

    Comment by SeekHim — June 6, 2007 @ 6:07 pm

    The answers you seek are in Leviticus 15. If you just touched her, you should isolate yourself in a bubble till this evening. If you ‘touched’ her, you should go into the bubble for a week, and not lie down on a bed. Also, it is very important that you not touch any furniture she’s been on, or touch her clothes, or else you have to wash your clothes and get in the bubble till nightfall.

    I would recommend just putting her in a biohazard suit, frankly. That’s what I do with the missus.

    Comment by DPS — June 7, 2007 @ 6:10 pm | Reply

  55. What if the rapture comes before the ‘08 election? Who should the rest of them vote for when Brownback’s gone?
    Comment by SeekHim — June 6, 2007 @ 9:37 pm

    God I am sure, will not let the rapture happen before the election because then Sam Brownback would be prevented from assuming the Presidency. If, God forbid it does happen, we are F*CKED and Rudy McRomney or Hitlery will be president and the terrorists and Islamoroundearthofaggots will win.

    Comment by ec1009 — June 7, 2007 @ 6:12 pm | Reply

  56. “But if I were you, I’d probably cut my hand off. It’s the only way to show true repentance. Then again, you can rely on God’s forgiveness. Still, if it were me, I’d still cut my hand off, as the ultimate act of humility.”

    That’s sooo Sharia!

    Comment by Skeptic — June 8, 2007 @ 9:43 am | Reply

  57. “How would you know? You’ve been following him around a lot, have you? I think the other commenters are right. We may have a Qaedist on our hands, here.”

    No! You found out!

    Now we will have to move ahead of schedule, we shall cleanse your country: we shall kill your leaders, scientists, evolutionists, helioleftists, atheists and homosexuals (well, they’re all one and the same) and you shall embrace Islam, the one true faith (the Koran says so, and the Koran is the infallible word of God).

    By Allah’s (praised be His name) mercy, we will allow Sheik Brownback to govern you.

    ALLAH UH ACKBAR!!!

    Comment by Skeptic — June 8, 2007 @ 9:52 am | Reply

  58. PG
    What are “freight-train rhetorics”? Variations of hobo slang and pidgin english?
    Wasn´t it you who compared Brownbacks rise to power like a freight train and warned the “moonbats” to stay off the rails. If not, then I apologize.

    I do not understand your enthusiasm for terrorism.

    Have seen an army pioneer battaillon in training. And of course, I´m soldier (in reserve) myself. I like the sights of things blowing up. It´s almost always the sign of a good ending for the exercise.

    @Sceptic: Hey, wait a bit! We europeans want our share of the party, too!🙂

    Comment by PG — June 8, 2007 @ 12:09 pm | Reply

  59. “What if the rapture comes before the ‘08 election? Who should the rest of them vote for when Brownback’s gone?”

    That shouldn’t be a concern for a righteous Brownback supporter. If that’s the case, we should all be ascending alongside the dear Senator.

    Comment by Onan — June 9, 2007 @ 11:01 am | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: