Blogs 4 Brownback

June 1, 2007

Terrorism Supporters are Rampant!

Filed under: Breaking News,Defending America,Faith,Media,Media Bias,Terrorism — Sisyphus @ 5:47 pm

The New York Post reports that 26% of young Muslims in America favor suicide bombings!

One out of four young U.S. Muslims believe suicide bombings against innocent civilians are OK to defend Islam, a disturbing new poll revealed yesterday.

The nationwide survey – one of the most exhaustive ever conducted of American Muslim attitudes – also found widespread doubt that Islamic terrorists carried out the 9/11 attacks.

Those of us on the Republican side of the fence are less surprised by this news, but we still want more Americans awakened to the gathering menace. Here’s where to go if you want the moonbat media to do some more reporting about it. We have to acknowledge that our enemies have widespread support in this country. We have to do something to address this problem immediately!

41 Comments »

  1. They are more faithful to their religion than Christians. At least they do what their holy book tells them, instead of picking parts they decide to follow, and ignoring the rest.

    Comment by Rachel — June 1, 2007 @ 5:56 pm | Reply

  2. We train young men to drop fire on people. But their commanders won’t allow them to write “f**k” on their airplanes because it’s obscene!

    Comment by carsick — June 1, 2007 @ 5:58 pm | Reply

  3. Good Point Rachel.

    We Christians need to get back to the Bible. Sam Brownback needs to make it a primary platform in his Presidential Campaign to deport all Muslim and other Illegal Immigrants the day he is inaugurated.

    Comment by Red Blooded American — June 1, 2007 @ 7:31 pm | Reply

  4. There a very simple solution to this that doesn’t require us to deport all the muslims. We should just kick out 26% of muslims. So, there are about 100 million muslims in the US. That means kicking out only 26 million, which isn’t nearly so hard. I think the easiest thing to do would be to have a kind of lottery to determine which 74 million get to stay. Once the 26 million terrorists are gone, no more problem!

    Comment by DPS — June 1, 2007 @ 8:12 pm | Reply

  5. “There a very simple solution to this that doesn’t require us to deport all the muslims. We should just kick out 26% of muslims. So, there are about 100 million muslims in the US. That means kicking out only 26 million, which isn’t nearly so hard. I think the easiest thing to do would be to have a kind of lottery to determine which 74 million get to stay. Once the 26 million terrorists are gone, no more problem!”

    That’s a good idea, but what if the lottery lets some of the bad guys stay? That’s not good. I think we should let the Muslims themselves decide which 26 million are going to be deported. That’s democracy in action. Plus, the good ones will know who the bad ones are, and they can help us out.

    Should we really deport the bad guys, though? I’m worried that if we do, we’ll just end up fighting them later. I thought we built Guantanamo for people like this. If Guantanamo’s not big enough, we should lease more land from Haiti or Belize so that we can build more camps to house our enemies. (Still, that’s the kind of problem you WANT to have.)

    Comment by Sisyphus — June 2, 2007 @ 5:12 am | Reply

  6. I heard Guantanamo can only hold 25 million Muslims. We need a better plan.

    Comment by Curious — June 2, 2007 @ 5:29 am | Reply

  7. “I heard Guantanamo can only hold 25 million Muslims. We need a better plan.”

    That’s why I’m saying we need to build more camps in Haiti, to house the overflow.

    Comment by Sisyphus — June 2, 2007 @ 5:30 am | Reply

  8. We need to start converting these people to Christianity. It’s the only way to keep them from attacking us. Why is our Army so worried about lowering Iraqi deaths, and not more worried about saving Iraqi souls? We should have the same priorities here, in America. My husband and I feel very strongly about this.

    Comment by Marcia P. — June 2, 2007 @ 8:50 am | Reply

  9. Marcia P.,

    The mullahs claim that you and your husband need to convert to Islam.

    Comment by Michael Ejercito — June 2, 2007 @ 9:13 am | Reply

  10. We need to kill those mullahs, Michael. They’re awful, awful people, and the world will be better off without them.

    Comment by Marcia P. — June 2, 2007 @ 9:38 am | Reply

  11. “We should just kick out 26% of muslims.”

    I don’t think this is a good plan. Rachel, up above, has pointed out that while the Muslims are 100% faithful to their Religion. We Americans are not 100% faithful to Christianity. This plan would only make us 26% faithful to Christianity. We need to be 100% faithful to Christianity. The way this would wind up working is that we would wind up deporting only 26% of the terrorists. We need to deport 100% of the terrorists and live our lives 100% for Jesus.

    I am for deportation, I do not want to be taxed to death to house these terrorists at Club Gitmo where they can get Lemongrass Chicken dinners and stay in accomodations better than most Americans. Ship them all back to the Middle East. They’ll be much happy there where they can shoot each other and pray to Allah five times a day.

    Comment by Red Blooded American — June 2, 2007 @ 9:40 am | Reply

  12. We should kill them all. Kill everyone who is unwilling to accept Christianity. It’s the only way to keep ourselves safe.

    Comment by Marcia P. — June 2, 2007 @ 9:46 am | Reply

  13. Maybe you’re right, RBA. Maybe we should just kill them.

    Comment by Sisyphus — June 2, 2007 @ 10:49 am | Reply

  14. That’s what Jesus would do I’m sure.

    Comment by ec1009 — June 2, 2007 @ 11:46 am | Reply

  15. That’s a good idea, but what if the lottery lets some of the bad guys stay? That’s not good. I think we should let the Muslims themselves decide which 26 million are going to be deported. That’s democracy in action. Plus, the good ones will know who the bad ones are, and they can help us out.

    Or the bag guys manage it to take the majority and kick out the good muslims…

    And honestly, Sisiphus, having them all in camps would require such immense funds that it´s not quite a good solution. And of course a lot of people would be very unpleased about that. You know, there were some other people putting a certain group of people in camps…. it didn´t end really THAT good.

    “We should kill them all. Kill everyone who is unwilling to accept Christianity. It’s the only way to keep ourselves safe.”

    Remember: Indiscriminately killing all members off a certain ethnic group tends to make you VERY unpopular with the whole world. Im german, I must know.

    Comment by PG — June 2, 2007 @ 2:19 pm | Reply

  16. “We should kill them all. Kill everyone who is unwilling to accept Christianity. It’s the only way to keep ourselves safe.”

    Finally, some Sanity.

    Comment by Traditional Values American — June 2, 2007 @ 5:45 pm | Reply

  17. Why does PG love terrorists so much? And why does he hate America?

    Comment by DPS — June 2, 2007 @ 5:46 pm | Reply

  18. “You know, there were some other people putting a certain group of people in camps…. it didn´t end really THAT good.”

    It seemed to work out pretty well when we did it to the Japanese. You don’t hear many complaints, anyway.

    “Remember: Indiscriminately killing all members off a certain ethnic group tends to make you VERY unpopular with the whole world. Im german, I must know.”

    We’re not talking about killing EVERYONE. I’m sure some middle ground can be reached for converting them to Christianity.

    Comment by Sisyphus — June 2, 2007 @ 5:58 pm | Reply

  19. “Why does PG love terrorists so much? And why does he hate America?”

    He says he’s German. That’s Old Europe. They all hate us. New Europe, that’s where our friends are.

    Comment by Sisyphus — June 2, 2007 @ 5:58 pm | Reply

  20. If we wanted to be ordered around by Germans, we would have surrendered in World War II. I think PG should go boss around some Frenchmen.

    Comment by DPS — June 2, 2007 @ 6:43 pm | Reply

  21. “If we wanted to be ordered around by Germans, we would have surrendered in World War II.”

    or got a job at BMW.

    Comment by ec1009 — June 2, 2007 @ 8:28 pm | Reply

  22. Why does PG love terrorists so much? And why does he hate America?

    Loving terrorists? Heck, no. Everyone trying to force his own political or religious doctrine onto another human by violence is imo a total nutjob and should be put into custody ASAP. This of course also includes such “forced conversion” whackos….

    And Mr, I don´t hate America. Only that arrogant attitude. And the sheer stupidity of some people in your country is quite irritating, too.

    We’re not talking about killing EVERYONE.

    May I quote?
    “We should kill them all. Kill everyone who is unwilling to accept Christianity. It’s the only way to keep ourselves safe.”

    If we wanted to be ordered around by Germans, we would have surrendered in World War II. I think PG should go boss around some Frenchmen.

    I´m not trying to boss around anyone. I´m just stating my opinion. Oh, well, try to boss around a frenchman yourself, please. But be sure to have a good health insurance before you try. They´re sometimes quite picky, you know.

    or got a job at BMW.

    Or Chrysler…. Wait, I forgot, Daimler ditched that money-burning-machine because the only thing Chrysler has ever done was to produce losses.

    Comment by PG — June 3, 2007 @ 2:12 am | Reply

  23. Well, at least we can all agree that nobody wants to drive a Chrysler.

    And look, *we* don’t want to invade France. Maybe bomb them a little, but not invade. So if you guys want to invade France again, go ahead. You know you want to… Plus, they always surrender right away, so it wouldn’t even be like a real war.

    Comment by DPS — June 3, 2007 @ 9:21 am | Reply

  24. Marcia, your husband’s name doesn’t happen to be Adolf, does it?

    I have a solution, we just dump all fundamentalists (Christians and Muslims alike) in Antarctica where they can all go kill each other, so us, sane people can get on with our lives!

    Comment by Skeptic — June 3, 2007 @ 9:41 am | Reply

  25. My husband’s name is Ralph. Ralph and I are church-going people. We don’t take kindly to all this talk of Islam in the news. If there were more Christians in the world, I think any Muslims left might learn their place a little better.

    Comment by Marcia P. — June 3, 2007 @ 12:12 pm | Reply

  26. Well with your ideas, maybe you should convert to another religion, Salafid Islam perhaps, cause Christianity isn’t the right religion for supporters of genocide.

    Comment by Skeptic — June 3, 2007 @ 12:31 pm | Reply

  27. Are you forgetting about The Flood and the Rapture skeptic. Do some research before you spout off your liberaloislamoathiestocommietreefroggery propaganda.

    Comment by ec1009 — June 3, 2007 @ 6:02 pm | Reply

  28. Nu uh! That’s Judaism.

    Comment by Skeptic — June 3, 2007 @ 6:45 pm | Reply

  29. And look, *we* don’t want to invade France. Maybe bomb them a little, but not invade. So if you guys want to invade France again, go ahead. You know you want to… Plus, they always surrender right away, so it wouldn’t even be like a real war.

    Invading France? Why? I mean, give me a serious reason to stomp the frenchies again. We have already the predidency over the EU. What´s there more to want?

    PS: Last time they surrendered after some Wehrmacht lackey marched down the Champs´Elysees (I hope I spelled that right.)
    And the time before that, they did not surrender at all…

    Comment by PD — June 4, 2007 @ 10:41 am | Reply

  30. Keep letting the Muslims take over your country, and you might have no choice but to invade France. Otherwise, where else will you live?

    Comment by Marcia P. — June 4, 2007 @ 12:29 pm | Reply

  31. Of course you could also ask nicely if you can come live there, but I guess that’s not the Christian way…

    Comment by Skeptic — June 4, 2007 @ 12:37 pm | Reply

  32. Keep letting the Muslims take over your country, and you might have no choice but to invade France. Otherwise, where else will you live?

    I don´t see any muslims taking over my country. A few of them have problems getting used to our law and stuff, but they´re single cases. Most of the immigrants behave good.

    Especially as I´m living in Southern Bavaria. Except in the big cities, seeing someone who is not either protestant or catholic is basically an oddity.

    Seriously, it´d be more likely for us to help the French defending themselves in case you try to bomb them. We´re allied with them after all. As are the brits, the italians and basically every other country in western europe. Except Switzerland of course. They´re neutral.

    Comment by PG — June 4, 2007 @ 12:56 pm | Reply

  33. PG
    I suspect Senator Brownback is pretty sure Germany knows which side its bread is buttered on so I suspect alliances will be tested in the event America decides to slap the French on the wrist a bit. In the end though, some alliances will prove more valuable than others and neutrality in some conflicts will be more than tempting.

    Comment by carsick — June 4, 2007 @ 5:03 pm | Reply

  34. @carsick: I think Mr. rownback underestimates the European Union. And the NATO alliance. You know, you can say a lot of bad things about us germans, but once we have an alliance with someone, we stick to it. No flip-flop!

    Comment by PG — June 5, 2007 @ 11:24 am | Reply

  35. Besides the Brits and the Poles (all 3 soldiers), there is no chance in hell, any European country would side with the US in such a conflict, we would probably even get Canada on our side, and I’m pretty sure, more sane elements in your government and military would dispose Brownback if he ever tried to pull off something like this.

    Comment by Skeptic — June 5, 2007 @ 11:25 am | Reply

  36. Besides the Brits and the Poles (all 3 soldiers), there is no chance in hell, any European country would side with the US in such a conflict, we would probably even get Canada on our side, and I’m pretty sure, more sane elements in your government and military would dispose Brownback if he ever tried to pull off something like this.”

    Don’t forget Romania! And Bulgaria/Czech Republic/Slovakia/Slovenia/Ukraine/Croatia/etc…

    Comment by Sisyphus — June 5, 2007 @ 11:41 am | Reply

  37. “you can say a lot of bad things about us germans, but once we have an alliance with someone, we stick to it.”

    I wonder if Stalin would agree with this assertion.

    Comment by DPS — June 6, 2007 @ 10:31 am | Reply

  38. “I wonder if Stalin would agree with this assertion.”

    A non-aggression pact isn’t the same as an alliance…

    Comment by Skeptic — June 6, 2007 @ 5:08 pm | Reply

  39. “Don’t forget Romania! And Bulgaria/Czech Republic/Slovakia/Slovenia/Ukraine/Croatia/etc…”

    Ah, yes, don’t forget the European Mexico that will ally itself with the highest bidder…

    Comment by Skeptic — June 6, 2007 @ 5:17 pm | Reply

  40. Mexico will be the 51st state soon. That’s tens of millions of new Americans eager to fight for their country…

    Comment by Sisyphus — June 6, 2007 @ 5:42 pm | Reply

  41. @DPS:
    Stalin should have read “Mein Kampf”. He would have seen it coming. That was never a true friendship to begin with.

    Ahh, Romania/Bulgaria etc. Let´s see how many soldiers they have to offer. Looks bad.

    And I somewhat don´t think that the Mexicans would like to fight for someone who just invaded their country…

    Comment by PG — June 7, 2007 @ 5:41 am | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: