Blogs 4 Brownback

May 24, 2007

RINO Romney Embraces Homosexuality

It turns out that Flipper supports Sodomites:

Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney said Thursday that his opposition to same-sex marriage should not be interpreted as intolerance of gays, who served in his administration when he was Massachusetts governor.

In a brief interview with The Associated Press, Romney elaborated on comments he made during a campaign event dubbed “Ask Mitt Anything” in which an audience member questioned whether pastors should preach that homosexuality is a sin. Romney said the government shouldn’t tell pastors what they can say.

Afterward, Romney said he would not preach the same message.

“I don’t think that a person who’s running for a secular position as I am should talk about or engage in discussions of what they in their personal faith or their personal beliefs is immoral or not immoral,” the former governor said in the AP interview.

If you love homosexuals so much, why don’t you marry them, Flipper? It’s perfectly legal in your state.

Any Republican who votes for this man might as well marry his best friend and burn an American flag at the “nuptials.”

38 Comments »

  1. How do you actually know that homosexuals exist? I think it is another ruse by the scientoleftists to enable a Democrat slush funds for good parties. I mean, rainbows? Everyone knows at the end are chests of gold and not gays.

    Comment by Joe — May 24, 2007 @ 6:49 pm | Reply

  2. Just because he doesn’t hate them, doesn’t mean he “loves” them.

    Comment by Beth — May 24, 2007 @ 7:25 pm | Reply

  3. Brownback is an ass-ramming sodomite and you know it! He spends more time in the bath houses than Mr. Slave. So get off your high horse.

    Brownback has gay butt sex with gelileo’s corpse.

    Comment by Gays for Brownback — May 24, 2007 @ 7:35 pm | Reply

  4. “Any Republican who votes for this man might as well marry his best friend and burn an American flag at the “nuptials.””

    That’s a little extreme don’t you think? Even for you…

    Comment by That's a little extreme — May 24, 2007 @ 7:38 pm | Reply

  5. This shouldn’t be a surprise, coming from a non-Christian who’s belief system allows polygamy. Once you start marrying your nieces, your nephew is not far behind. Nor is your goat or your dog. Even the melons must be scared at this point.

    Comment by Carey Meiers — May 24, 2007 @ 9:25 pm | Reply

  6. “Just because he doesn’t hate them, doesn’t mean he “loves” them.”

    He’s clearly pandering to them. That’s close enough to love for a politician.

    Comment by Sisyphus — May 25, 2007 @ 3:06 am | Reply

  7. “Brownback has gay butt sex with gelileo’s corpse.”

    That’s borderline libelous, and certainly unpleasant. Be sure to vote Brownback, though!

    Comment by Sisyphus — May 25, 2007 @ 4:36 am | Reply

  8. Good point Carey. It’s a well known fact that gay marriage will lead to polygamy. Since romney is already there, it’s not a surprise for him to regress back towards gay marriage.

    Marriage should be about procreation only.

    Comment by Harry — May 25, 2007 @ 7:20 am | Reply

  9. “Marriage should be about procreation only.”

    Amen.

    Comment by Sisyphus — May 25, 2007 @ 7:23 am | Reply

  10. Agreed. Couples who cannot or will not breed should have their marriage annulled.

    Comment by Carey Meiers — May 25, 2007 @ 9:36 am | Reply

  11. How many pups have you whelped, Carey ?

    Comment by R.L.Page — May 25, 2007 @ 9:45 am | Reply

  12. Romney needs to explain how it is he can remain married to his wife and still be a resident of Massachusetts, where homosexual marriage has been legalized.

    Comment by tc — May 25, 2007 @ 10:24 am | Reply

  13. Possible alternative titles for this post that would also catch the true implications of Willard “Mitt” Romney’s ‘position’:

    “RINO Romney firmly embraces homosexuals”

    and

    “RINO Romney loves sodomy”

    Comment by DPS — May 25, 2007 @ 10:47 am | Reply

  14. Well, who doesn’t, DPS?

    Comment by R.L.Page — May 25, 2007 @ 10:48 am | Reply

  15. “How many pups have you whelped, Carey ?”

    That’s a very perverse question, R.L.

    This is your warning for the day. One more man-on-dog query or outright blasphemy, and you’re banned until tomorrow.

    Comment by Sisyphus — May 25, 2007 @ 10:49 am | Reply

  16. “This is your warning for the day. One more man-on-dog query or outright blasphemy, and you’re banned until tomorrow.”

    I’m not trying to censor you with this, but there’s a big difference between simple atheism and anti-religious bigotry. You keep crossing that line, and I keep getting email complaints about it.

    Comment by Sisyphus — May 25, 2007 @ 10:54 am | Reply

  17. Oh no ! not “email complaints” … !

    But if Carey is a man (and I have no proof of that) why would ‘he’ be concerned with women’s reproductive decisions? Particularly, women he does not know. For that matter, what business is it of his (or anyone else’s) whether anyone has children? Shall we in America begin legislating these matters as the Chinese government does?

    Of course, you may have merely misunderstood my comment; perhaps being unclear as to the meaning of “whelped.”

    Comment by R.L.Page — May 25, 2007 @ 11:11 am | Reply

  18. By the way, could you explain the difference for me between ‘atheism’ and “simple atheism.” Thanking you in advance.

    Comment by R.L.Page — May 25, 2007 @ 11:11 am | Reply

  19. Sisyphus:

    I can’t believe that you’re bothering to argue with someone who thinks human beings can have canine children. Although I guess that’s par for the course if you’re a Darwinist. After all, their whole great idea is that dogs have monkey children and monkeys have human children.

    The amazing thing is that this lunacy has gained any traction at all.

    Comment by DPS — May 25, 2007 @ 11:26 am | Reply

  20. ROMENYS GAY ITS A FACT HE LIKES OT KISS JOHN KERR AND THE OTHER LEFTY HOMOSEXUALS!!!

    Comment by Jack Fremont — May 25, 2007 @ 12:12 pm | Reply

  21. Romney always did seem a little swishy, if you ask me.

    It’s a shame they don’t put people in prison for acting like that anymore. Romney could run for office from his cellblock.

    Comment by Marcia P. — May 25, 2007 @ 12:21 pm | Reply

  22. Are gay Mormons allowed to have more than one boyfriend.

    Comment by R.L.Page — May 25, 2007 @ 12:30 pm | Reply

  23. Why do you hate gays? All they did is love. Do you think love is wrong?

    And just because some one supports gays, doesn’t make them one, you stereotyping fool.

    Comment by Rachel — May 25, 2007 @ 2:01 pm | Reply

  24. The fact is, liberals are really stupid and faggy too. We need to stop the bias.

    Comment by Gary Ruppert — May 25, 2007 @ 3:00 pm | Reply

  25. I knew Gary Ruppert. And you, sir, are no Gary Ruppert.

    Comment by R.L.Page — May 25, 2007 @ 5:56 pm | Reply

  26. There has been a lot of joking around in this thread, but I think we need to wake up to a serious potential problem for 2008. When I look at all of the major candidates for president, I think that unless we are careful we may very well end up putting a CRYPTO-SODOMITE in the White House. Think about it. Romney? Of course. Giuliani? Please. Edwards? Say no more.

    Of all the major candidates, there are only two that I am positive do not have relations with men: Senator Brownback and Hitlery Clinton. Clinton is obviously unacceptable. So even if I didn’t agree with everything Senator Brownback stands for, which I do, I feel like I would have to vote for him just in order to make sure that the White House wouldn’t turn into a 24-hour drive-through homosexual brothel. So that’s just one more reason to vote Brownback.

    In some states, it might even be good to have a bumper sticker with something like:

    Vote Brownback, or America Gets Sodomized!

    or maybe

    Brownback, not Brokeback!

    I don’t think it could hurt, anyway. The bumper sticker, I mean. Not the sodomy.

    Comment by DPS — May 25, 2007 @ 6:36 pm | Reply

  27. “Brownback, not Brokeback!”

    I like this one. If I see it, I’ll put it on my truck.

    Comment by Sisyphus — May 25, 2007 @ 6:42 pm | Reply

  28. Senator Clinton could have sexual relations exclusively with women and still be a sodomite. As to “turn[ing] … the White House into a 24-hour drive-through homosexual brothel,” I think that train’s already been pulled. Two words: Jeff Gannon.

    Comment by R.L.Page — May 25, 2007 @ 8:06 pm | Reply

  29. Why does this surprise anyone?

    Romney is clearly a homosexual. He is just as effiminate and swishy as that “Breck Girl” John Edwards.

    Comment by Red State American — May 26, 2007 @ 1:36 am | Reply

  30. Two words: Jeff Gannon.

    Comment by R.L.Page — May 25, 2007 @ 8:06 pm

    WHy do so many liberals, who claim to love gay people, use Jeff Gannon as a boogeyman?

    Comment by Gary Ruppert — May 26, 2007 @ 10:53 am | Reply

  31. Jeff Gannon should only be used as a buggerman.

    Comment by ec1009 — May 26, 2007 @ 11:35 am | Reply

  32. Of course you libtards would criticize our President for trying to give a repentant sinner a second chance in life. You don’t hate anything more than people who see the light and turn away from sin and stop putting their maleness in places where it doesn’t belong.

    Comment by DPS — May 26, 2007 @ 10:20 pm | Reply

  33. “stop putting their maleness in places where it doesn’t belong.”

    After that comment I will ignore you humans for another 2000 years.

    Comment by GOD — May 27, 2007 @ 9:37 pm | Reply

  34. Who says little Jeffy’s “maleness” doesn’t get put where it don’t belong any more ?

    Comment by R.L.Page — May 28, 2007 @ 12:05 am | Reply

  35. R.L.Page @ 34:

    Sinners often relapse into sin. If that is true, and I would be sad to learn that it is, it is in spite of the good efforts of our Commander-in-Chief.

    Comment by DPS — May 28, 2007 @ 8:22 pm | Reply

  36. Jeff Gannon and Ted Haggard have admitted and atoned for their sins. When was the last time a liberal homosexual did the same?

    Comment by Marcia P. — May 29, 2007 @ 12:56 pm | Reply

  37. “After all, their whole great idea is that dogs have monkey children and monkeys have human children.”
    No, it isn’t.
    “ROMENYS GAY ITS A FACT”
    No, it isn’t.
    “I think that unless we are careful we may very well end up putting a CRYPTO-SODOMITE in the White House.”
    That’s rather silly.
    “Why do you hate gays? All they did is love. Do you think love is wrong? And just because some one supports gays, doesn’t make them one, you stereotyping fool.”
    Finally, some sense out of this god-forsaken website.

    Comment by neutronnate — August 17, 2007 @ 3:07 am | Reply

  38. Romney is a total fag. That’s why he needs his barbie-doll wife and five sons for cover. With his millions, he can have one “wife” and harems and harems of gayboys. Who does he think he is fooling?

    Comment by thomas paine — August 24, 2007 @ 8:56 pm | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: