Blogs 4 Brownback

March 9, 2007

Dismantling the Sino-Syrian-Libyan-Iranian World Government

Filed under: Defending America,Election 2008,Terrorism — Sisyphus @ 2:05 pm

It’s important to keep our nation free of the entangling tentacles of an organization spearheaded by the likes of France, China, Libya, Syria, and Iran. This is common sense among right-thinking people in this country. But what will President Brownback do about the issue of authoritarian regimes using the United Nations as cover for establishing One World Government? Let’s find out:

The United Nations continues to be the subject of great controversy. The U.N. has been instrumental in resolving a number of international disputes, and its work should not go unnoticed. However, it too often couples lofty ideals with poor execution. As such, reforming the U.N. must remain a priority. In the 104th Congress I supported the National Security Revitalization Act, which prohibited U.S. military forces from being placed under U.N. command and control in most situations. Further, it provided for the U.S. to be reimbursed for participation in U.N. peacekeeping operations. I believe we should reduce the size of the U.N., and that the U.S. should bear less of the organization’s financial burden. I have long supported – and will continue to support – efforts to condition our country’s U.N. dues on substantive U.N. reform

There you have it. A candidate truly committed to defanging the menacing beast of authoritarian world domination by a cabal of Islamists and Chinese Fascists. Once Brownback wins this election, getting rid of the United Nations will have to become a top priority.



  1. It’s about time we got out of the UN! YEAH!

    Comment by Harry — March 9, 2007 @ 4:13 pm | Reply

  2. Get the US out of the UN and the UN out of the US. Nothing but a bunch of anti-American criminals. John Bolton was right:

    “There’s no such thing as the United Nations,” John Bolton declared in 1994. “If the U.N. secretary building in New York lost 10 stories, it wouldn’t make a bit of difference.”

    He got that right.

    Sam Brownback is a bit more nuanced about it:

    I believe we should reduce the size of the U.N., and that the U.S. should bear less of the organization’s financial burden.

    Reducing the size by ten floors might be a good start.

    Comment by Psycheout — March 9, 2007 @ 5:38 pm | Reply

  3. Not only should we get out of the UN, we should dismantle it brick by brick. Level the building, kick the delegates out of this country, and cut taxes by the amount we waste on UN fees. It’s the best way I can think of to use the UN to strengthen our economy.

    Comment by Sisyphus — March 10, 2007 @ 5:00 am | Reply

  4. That’s a pretty moderate approach, Sisyphus, that anyone in America should support. But can we leave the delegates in the building while its being levelled?

    The resulting bricks can then be thrown through the windows of the New York Slimes and at liberals who don’t support our troops!

    It’s a win-win-win solution.

    Comment by Anti-Media — March 10, 2007 @ 12:36 pm | Reply

  5. Personally, I think a good case can be made for levelling most of New York, Anti-Media. But we have to take a moderate approach, here. We have to reach a broader audience.

    Comment by Sisyphus — March 10, 2007 @ 6:46 pm | Reply

  6. I don’t really see what would be wrong with a DEMOCRATIC world government, it would end war, and that would be a good thing, I think, but that’s just my humble opinion.

    Comment by Skeptic — May 21, 2007 @ 4:37 pm | Reply

  7. You’re either a fool or a Crypto-Fascist, Skeptic. Democratic world government won’t work, unless it’s like the “Democratic Republic of North Korea”, i.e. it exists in name only and only to advance the interests of FASCISTS, Darwinists, and Marxists.

    Comment by Sisyphus — May 21, 2007 @ 4:41 pm | Reply

  8. Why not?

    2000 years ago, the largest country (China) had a population of 60 million, now the largest democracy in the world (India) has a population of 1,2 billion, now if 1,2 billion people can live in one democratic nation, than why can’t 6,5 billion?

    200 years ago, who would have thought that war-torn Europe, scattered with various deadlocked alliances could ever become a peaceful, cooperative union?

    Now, if it worked for Europe, I don’t see why it won’t work for the entire planet, someday?

    Comment by Skeptic — May 21, 2007 @ 7:32 pm | Reply

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: