Blogs 4 Brownback

March 6, 2007

Ha Ha, Rudy!

Filed under: Rudy Giuliani — Sisyphus @ 4:25 pm

Even your own son won’t endorse your candidacy:

In an interview with the New York Times, Andrew Giuliani, 21, said “there’s obviously a little problem” between him and Rudy Giuliani’s current wife, Judith.

He also said his quest to become a professional golfer doesn’t leave him any time to help out his father.

“I am going to be focused on my golf … definitely over the next bunch of years,” the younger Giuliani told the Times. “So, I’m not going to have time to, even if I wanted to, be in the campaign.”

Let this be a warning to the Giulianiacs out there: find yourselves a real candidate, Brownback. Or, back a twice-divorced cross-dresser who can’t even get his son’s endorsement. You might as well elect Billary Commander-in-Chief.

— Sisyphus


  1. Shorter Andrew Giuliani: Thanks but no thanks. I want to spend more time with my family.

    Ha ha ha ha! Too bad, Rudy. Go wear a dress and cry in the corner!

    Comment by Mad Dog — March 6, 2007 @ 9:37 pm | Reply

  2. Shorter Andrew Giuliani: Thanks but no thanks, dad. I’d rather spend more time with my family.

    Put on a frilly dress and cry in the corner, Rudy. Even your own son thinks you suck.

    Comment by Mad Dog — March 7, 2007 @ 12:48 am | Reply

  3. Sorry for the double post. The first comment didn’t appear until I posted the second, hours later.

    Signed, Rabid About Rudy

    Comment by Mad Dog — March 7, 2007 @ 12:50 am | Reply

  4. Off Topic, but this just makes me mad. “Conservatives” Against Brownback?
    More like RINOs for Rudy.

    Comment by Bob Arctor — March 7, 2007 @ 7:53 am | Reply

  5. Those RINOS will rue the day they began that website.

    Comment by Sisyphus — March 7, 2007 @ 1:31 pm | Reply

  6. Why are my comments disappearing?

    Comment by Anti-Media — March 7, 2007 @ 5:48 pm | Reply

  7. Sorry, technical issues.

    Comment by Sisyphus — March 7, 2007 @ 6:46 pm | Reply

  8. Talk about LAME! There’s a new post up at “conservatives” against Brownback about how he didn’t support Jack Booted Government Thugs enforcing anti-gay adoption laws on This Week. Whatever. I posted a rebuttal which the cowards apparantly deleted.

    Here it is, for posterity:

    Oh come on. It’s a scandal for a conservative to support state’s rights now? Senator Brownback doesn’t want the Federal Government to impose upon the states what they must do one way or the other.

    If he comes out steadfastly against “gay adoption” as something the Federal Government should enforce, that will only encourage the far left gay agenda to push that much harder the other way. It will also alienate some voters and divide the rest. Sam’s strong conservative and family friendly message appeals to Americans in general. And that’s the way it should be.

    If you know anything about Sam’s stance on the sanctity of marriage and the family, you would know that he does not support freak families with two mommies or two daddies. But Sam isn’t about to hand the moonbats an issue to club him to death with.

    I suppose you’d rather he have an Ann Coulter “faggot” moment on This Week, but Sam is much too smart for that. And way too classy.

    As long as you and other “conservatives” buy into the MSM spin, a true conservative like Sam Brownback will never be nominated. And that, in itself, should give you pause.

    I can’t believe you’d put up a clip of an ambush “interview” by Stephanopolous (liberal Clinton pal) to bushwhack the Senator from Kansas. It makes me wonder: if you have such disdain for a real conservative like Brownback, who do you support?

    No offense intended, but I’d really like to know. What’s your plan? What’s your vision?

    I think the website is a liberal troll site because other than me (when I’m not deleted) the comments are all sockpuppet cheers for the buffalo chips they post against Sam Brownback, the only true conservative in the 2008 campaign thus far.

    Comment by Bob Arctor — March 7, 2007 @ 10:49 pm | Reply

  9. I showed those moonbats, too. Here’s what I said:

    “There’s nothing to doubt, here. Brownback doesn’t want to take an issue away from the states, even one he feels very strongly about. Homosexuals should not be permitted to adopt, and indoctrinate, our children. Brownback understands this. However, he knows that until he’s in the White House, there’s very little he can do about leftist lunatics permitting this sort of occurrence. States have varying levels of morality and civilization; the states that lean toward depravity must be free to drive themselves off of a cliff until it endangers the rest of us or violates federal bailiwicks. The Constitution is very clear about that, and so is Sam Brownback.”

    I agree, the place is so left-wing it should stand on a billboard at Haight-Ashbury and squirt patchouli oil on the deadbeat passers-by. I expect those frauds will come out of their closet long before this election. Nice try, Obamites!

    Comment by Sisyphus — March 8, 2007 @ 12:06 am | Reply

  10. I can’t beleive that anyone would even consider Rudy Guliani as the Conservative candidate for President! I know the media treated him like some kind of hero after 9/11 — For what? Doing his Job??? — but he’s the last thing our country needs right now. America is going straight to the dogs, with the help of the “Judicial” branch and those Traitors in Congress. And people think that Sleezy New York Liberal Lawyer in RINO’s clothing can bring us up out of the muck?? Ha!!!

    Comment by patricia — March 8, 2007 @ 12:08 am | Reply

  11. If you like a crossdressing abortionist adulterist who can take credit for what firemen and policemen do every day (esp during a tragedy), Rudy’s your man!

    Patricia is absolutely right. Have you read up on the kind of liberal judges Rudy approves of? Do you want that kind on the Supreme Court. I sure don’t!

    Comment by Red State Guy — March 8, 2007 @ 2:06 am | Reply

  12. I won’t write off Conservatives Against Brownback just yet. If it can be used to get voters on Brownback’s side it will be worthwhile to continue commenting there and fending off their baseless attacks against Sam. The only inappropriate language I used was “f-gg-t” but that was only because Ann Coulter used it. But I guess it’s a PC site. Peh. It’s not as if I didn’t speak the pure unadulterated (heh, Rudy) truth.

    Comment by Bob Arctor — March 8, 2007 @ 2:11 am | Reply



    Comment by Jack Fremont — May 17, 2007 @ 10:54 am | Reply

  14. […] Election 2008, Family — Psycheout @ 12:05 pm Quite awhile back, B4B reported that not even Rudy Giuliani’s son was willing to support Rudy.  Well, it seems Rudy’s daughter isn’t supporting daddy […]

    Pingback by Ha Ha, Rudy! (Part II) « Blogs 4 Brownback — August 7, 2007 @ 12:05 pm | Reply

  15. […] six marriages between the two of them. Talk about family values! In fact neither Rudy’s son, nor his daughter from a previous marriage are supporting his campaign! Then there was the news […]

    Pingback by Profile: Judy Giuliani « Blogs 4 Conservatives — November 13, 2007 @ 8:54 am | Reply

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: