Blogs 4 Brownback

January 16, 2008

The Statue of Liberty Must Be Destroyed

Statue of LibertyI know this is a controversial topic, but I feel it must be raised. The Statue of “Liberty” has many adherents, including otherwise-patriotic and Christian Republican Americans. It is with the deepest respect for the feelings and sensibilities of these individuals that I proceed with this admonition.

The Statue of “Liberty” does not, in point of fact, represent liberty. It represents Jacobinism, license, and the riotous murder that marked both the French Revolution and the tumultuous riots that marred 19th-century New York City. Even a cursory glance at the historical background of this Trojan Horse of a “gift” from the Atheist secularist French shows an atmosphere of nascent Bolshevism and covert anti-Christianity:

The Statue of Liberty was a gift from France to the United States. Arriving at the entrance of New York harbor on June 17th, 1884, the Statue of Liberty has proudly stayed there ever since. The statue stands nearly 150 feet tall and is a woman with her arm held high with a lit torch. In her other hand she is clutching a book.

In 1903 an inscription was added on the inside which reads, in part:

Give me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, The wretched refuse of your teeming shore. Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me, I lift my lamp beside the golden door!

This poem is often selectively quoted out of context by those seeking to justify more immigration into the United States, when in fact the Statue of Liberty has nothing to do with immigration.

This French idol was sent to America to justify the unrestricted introduction of innumerable anarchists and Bolshevists from Eastern and Southern Europe into our great nation. It is still used to justify the admission of Leftists from Latin America and elsewhere.

Don’t be fooled by French propoganda on the subject. This statue commemorates their Godless revolution, not our Christian one. Significantly, it did not arrive in America until 1885, which is as close to the centennial of the French Revolution as French Socialists could make it without denigrating their own ceremonies celebrating the mass decapitation of Catholic priests and the expropriation of sovereign property by surly proletarian archaeo-Marxists.

Leaving aside the fact that this idol is French, a rallying point for leftist pro-immigrationism, and a closeted torch-bearer for the international Communist insurgency, there are more important reasons why America must cast this image down from amongst us. The Statue is flagrantly a graven image. Anyone who’s ever read the Bible knows what it says about the worship of such false idols:

The graven images of their gods shall ye burn with fire: thou shalt not desire the silver or gold that is on them, nor take it unto thee, lest thou be snared therin: for it is an abomination to the LORD thy God. Deuteronomy 7:25

And ye shall overthrow their altars, and break their pillars, and burn their groves with fire; and ye shall hew down the graven images of their gods, and destroy the names of them out of that place. Deuteronomy 12:3

For they provoked Him to anger with their high places, and moved Him to jealousy with their graven images. Psalms 78:58

Confounded be all they that serve graven images, that boast themselves of idols: worship Him, all ye gods. Psalm 97:7

Ye shall defile also the covering of thy graven images of silver, and the ornament of thy molten images of gold: thou shalt cast them away as a menstruous cloth; thou shalt say unto it, Get thee hence. Isaiah 30:22

I am the LORD: that is my name: and my glory will I not give to another, neither my praise to graven images. Isaiah 42:8

They shall be turned back, they shall be greatly ashamed, that trust in graven images, that say to the molten images, Ye are our gods. Isaiah 42:17

Therefore, behold, the days come, that I will do judgment upon the graven images of Babylon: and her whole land shall be confounded, and all her slain shall fall in the midst of her. Jeremiah 51:47

Thy graven images also will I cut off, and thy standing images out of the midst of thee; and thou shalt no more worship the work of thine hands. Micah 5:13

And lest we forget, the use of graven images in Pagan religious practices also violates two of the Ten Commandments:

“And God spoke all these words, saying: ‘I am the LORD your God…

ONE: ‘You shall have no other gods before Me.’

TWO: ‘You shall not make for yourself a carved image–any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth.’”

Statue of LibertyThe Statue is such a graven image. As proof, one need merely look at the New York state license plate. The Statue is very prominently displayed on this license plate, as befits a state renowned for Godlessness, savagery, Marxism, Atheism, and sexual deviancy. Conspicuously absent from this license plate is any depiction of Our Lord, Jesus Christ, Whose agonies on the Cross washed away the sins of the world and gave us hope in Salvation. Yes, there’s no room for any depiction of the True Religion on the New York license plate, but there is room for a Bolshevist French harlot clad in nothing but a bedsheet, brandishing a firebrand and a copy of some book that may well be either the “Communist Manifesto” or “Origin of the Species,” calling all evildoers to come to America and worship her as their false god. Yes, very little about this license plate is surprising, I am saddened to say.

Hopefully, President Huckabee or President Brownback will put aside the outcry of the dim-witted and idly sinful among patriotic Americans, as well as outright silencing the inevitable uproar from Marxist, secularist, Darwinist, Helioleftist, and immigrationist circles. Hopefully, either one of those men will show the strength of character and moral vision to cast down this disgusting monument to human iniquity. Cast down the Statue, that God may yet forgive our nation for its many sins and travesties.

True leadership means not having to apologize when you are right, just as you must humbly admit it when you are wrong. I hope our next Republican President remembers that, and demolishes this evil edifice once and for all.

109 Comments »

  1. Thank you for opening my eyes to yet another aspect of the French menace. We surely must be ever watchful!

    Comment by BJ Dogg — January 16, 2008 @ 11:22 am | Reply

  2. Congratulations – this is absolutely the most hillarious post that you have EVER written!

    So – where do I begin?

    “This French idol was sent to America to justify the unrestricted introduction of innumerable anarchists and Bolshevists from Eastern and Southern Europe into our great nation.”

    Of course it was: and you see how successful they were in turning the U.S. into a communist country.

    p.s.: do you even know what “Bolshevist” really means?

    “…their Godless revolution”

    The initial intent of the “revolution” was not to overthrow the monarchy/old order, but to get it to ease up off of the backs (financially) of the common French citizen. granted, it did get ‘hijacked” by the leftist Jacobins, but once they pussed things to far the military got rid of them.

    “The Statue is flagrantly a graven image. Anyone who’s ever read the Bible knows what it says about the worship of such false idols.”

    I love turning on my T.V. on Sunday mornings and watch the worship services as they pray to the Statue of Liberty: I particularly like the human sacrifices. Please…

    WHO worships the Staute is if it were the representation of a deity? This is news to me. Your brand of “no graven images” is pure hard-line fundamentalist Islam, dude.

    Comment by indyandy — January 16, 2008 @ 12:20 pm | Reply

  3. This is really hilarious. This is my first time here. I take it you’re a satire site, sort of like Landover Baptist?

    Comment by Delia — January 16, 2008 @ 12:41 pm | Reply

  4. This is not a reliable source. This is a wiki, easily changed by anyone.
    This is a reliable source, an American government website.
    “The Statue is flagrantly a graven image.”
    “‘You shall not make for yourself a carved image–any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth.’”
    “Conspicuously absent from this license plate is any depiction of Our Lord, Jesus Christ”
    So you have a problem with showing the Statue of Liberty, which is just a woman in a robe, but you want to show Jesus everywhere, even though he falls into the restrictions of the 2nd Commandment? Hypocrite is hypocritical.
    And I’ve never seen a license plate in any state that has jesus on it. for that matter, i haven’t seen any religious icons on a license plate.

    Comment by Elephant Bones — January 16, 2008 @ 12:46 pm | Reply

  5. It’s well known the witches of New York City sacrifice Christian babies at the foot of the Statue of Liberty in midnight ceremonies. Sisyphus is correct, the Statue of Liberty is nothing more than a pagan goddess raised by the atheists to celebrate the triumph of Darwinism. Even the official descriptions call it the “goddess” of Liberty. Well that means she is a false goddess and as a Christian I will have no such thing in my country.

    Comment by BJ Tabor — January 16, 2008 @ 12:49 pm | Reply

  6. “It’s well known the witches of New York City sacrifice Christian babies at the foot of the Statue of Liberty in midnight ceremonies.”

    LOLWUT

    Troll harder, nutbag. It’s not true, but if it were, I’d question why you weren’t a victim. Also, I hope they sacrifice any sort of horrible mutant creature you spawn by fornicating with your relatives.

    Comment by Dio Brando — January 16, 2008 @ 1:04 pm | Reply

  7. “It’s well known the witches of New York City sacrifice Christian babies at the foot of the Statue of Liberty in midnight ceremonies.”
    Guess I’ve been living under a rock, because I ain’t ever heard of such shenanigans.

    Comment by Elephant Bones — January 16, 2008 @ 1:12 pm | Reply

  8. What about those giant heads on Mt. Rushmore?

    Comment by Ann O'Maly — January 16, 2008 @ 2:37 pm | Reply

  9. “And I’ve never seen a license plate in any state that has jesus on it. for that matter, i haven’t seen any religious icons on a license plate.”

    I know. That’s the problem.

    “It’s well known the witches of New York City sacrifice Christian babies at the foot of the Statue of Liberty in midnight ceremonies. Sisyphus is correct, the Statue of Liberty is nothing more than a pagan goddess raised by the atheists to celebrate the triumph of Darwinism. Even the official descriptions call it the “goddess” of Liberty. Well that means she is a false goddess and as a Christian I will have no such thing in my country.”

    It’s OUR country, BJ. We have to take it back.

    “What about those giant heads on Mt. Rushmore?”

    At least those are Presidents. But, I see your point. I’m more ambivalent on that one, since those are our leaders and most of the ones depicted were good ones. Still, I could be swayed either way. One battle at a time.

    Comment by Sisyphus — January 16, 2008 @ 3:52 pm | Reply

  10. If there was ever any doubt as to whether this site was satire or not, this post settles that doubt once and for all, you have now claimed that almost everything is evil, even the statue of liberty, you status as a troll is now secure. No one ever did believe you, and this guaruntees that no one ever will. (except of course for those so called commnters that are really just your booty buddies commenting for you so you don’t seem completely alone in your insanity)

    Comment by Arn — January 16, 2008 @ 3:53 pm | Reply

  11. “If there was ever any doubt as to whether this site was satire or not, this post settles that doubt once and for all, you have now claimed that almost everything is evil, even the statue of liberty, you status as a troll is now secure. No one ever did believe you, and this guaruntees that no one ever will. (except of course for those so called commnters that are really just your booty buddies commenting for you so you don’t seem completely alone in your insanity)”

    Typical leftist. When confronted with irrefutable evidence, claim your adversary is being dishonest.

    Comment by Sisyphus — January 16, 2008 @ 4:03 pm | Reply

  12. Thanks for this post, Sisyphus. Keep speaking truth to power.

    Comment by Justin R. — January 16, 2008 @ 4:18 pm | Reply

  13. Thanks, Justin. Whatever that means, it sounds positive.

    Comment by Sisyphus — January 16, 2008 @ 4:19 pm | Reply

  14. “This is really hilarious. This is my first time here. I take it you’re a satire site, sort of like Landover Baptist?”

    No.

    Comment by Sisyphus — January 16, 2008 @ 4:25 pm | Reply

  15. “WHO worships the Staute is if it were the representation of a deity? This is news to me. Your brand of “no graven images” is pure hard-line fundamentalist Islam, dude.”

    The Bible is NOT Islamism.

    Comment by Sisyphus — January 16, 2008 @ 4:26 pm | Reply

  16. Sissy Puss,

    Once again you are a shining star of reason and piety in a dark world over-run with pagans, islamo-facists, libral-facists and baby-killing darwinists.

    If it wasn’t for the wisdom on this site, I think I would have to bang my head into walls and pull my fingernails out with my teeth in order to stay sane in this demon-besotted nightmare.

    Comment by Marty McPain — January 16, 2008 @ 4:30 pm | Reply

  17. Way to ignore the rest of what I said, especially the parts where i pointed out your contradictions, Sisyphus.
    “True leadership means not having to apologize when you are right, just as you must humbly admit it when you are wrong.”
    How about practicing what you preach?

    Comment by Elephant Bones — January 16, 2008 @ 5:06 pm | Reply

  18. I would be happy if they would at least not have her wearing a toga like a drunken college whore from “Girls Gone Wild: Frat Style”. You also forgot to mention how the crafty French bastards tricked American children out of their hard earned pennies to pay for the base of the Whore Statue.

    Comment by Diablo — January 16, 2008 @ 5:55 pm | Reply

  19. I do love how everyone just halls off and attacks Sisyphus truth speaking as a “troll” and yet no one bother to deal with the issues he raises head on. What’s next, Sisyphus is a Nazi? Yep, we will see who is trolling or joking when Huckabee is raised to the Presidency by Jesus.

    Comment by BJ Tabor — January 16, 2008 @ 6:17 pm | Reply

  20. “And I’ve never seen a license plate in any state that has jesus on it. for that matter, i haven’t seen any religious icons on a license plate.”

    Hear, hear! I’ve always wanted my license plate to have a classic image of Mjolnir in Thor’s raised fist, but I’m told that’s “State Sponsorship of Religion.”

    They’ll be sorry when I’m laughing at them in the halls of Valhalla. Odin smite them for their blasphemies!

    Comment by HornedHelmet — January 16, 2008 @ 8:41 pm | Reply

  21. “How about practicing what you preach?”

    I do, EB. I most certainly do.

    “I would be happy if they would at least not have her wearing a toga like a drunken college whore from “Girls Gone Wild: Frat Style”. You also forgot to mention how the crafty French bastards tricked American children out of their hard earned pennies to pay for the base of the Whore Statue.”

    That’s how your Commie operates, by making the innocent do his dirty work for him.

    Comment by Sisyphus — January 16, 2008 @ 8:53 pm | Reply

  22. “I do, EB. I most certainly do.”
    I’m sorry, could you repeat that? What you do speaks so loudly I can’t hear what you say.

    Comment by Elephant Bones — January 16, 2008 @ 9:13 pm | Reply

  23. And if the WTC hadn’t been blown up before, you would blow up those buildings as well and find it heroic.

    You are a bunch of lame terrorists disguised as Christians.

    Comment by Reswati — January 17, 2008 @ 9:32 am | Reply

  24. There is no way that there are people out there that believe these things. This is a satire website, right? It has to be.

    No one would allow someone into office who wants to destroy the Statue of Liberty. To destroy the greatest symbol of freedom in the WORLD would be a grievous act of terrorism–even more so than the WTC. Even if it’s our own president who destroys it, he would be impeached.
    Lady Liberty is iconic, and stands for what America used to be. She used to welcome people with open arms, now she’s beating people off with a baseball bat screaming, “YOU WANT A PIECE OF ME?!”

    No, but seriously…you guys can’t seriously believe that. I’d hate to see this country (or PLANET, for that matter) if people like this had their way.

    Comment by Anubis — January 17, 2008 @ 1:03 pm | Reply

  25. Post 5.
    It’s well known the witches of New York City sacrifice Christian babies at the foot of the Statue of Liberty in midnight ceremonies.
    Please give us a citation. It will make for some very intresting reading.

    “my country.”

    As if. ‘Country in which I live would be more accurate.

    Post 20.
    What “blasphemies” excatly… do I have to re-define my understanding of that word?… sigh.

    Post 24.
    ohhhh Anubis. Great name, though now I brought attention to it, you may be attacked for having such a ‘pagan’ name. Sorry(ish :P)

    But not untill they (would be attackers) go on to some silly website where the truth of the matter is comletly hidden by lies, new stories and all other nasty things that hurt objective discussions. And then use that stupidity

    Comment by Austin — January 17, 2008 @ 8:35 pm | Reply

  26. “And if the WTC hadn’t been blown up before, you would blow up those buildings as well and find it heroic.”

    The WTC was a building full of innocent victims. It was not a graven image. The difference between the two is enormous.

    “You are a bunch of lame terrorists disguised as Christians.”

    Terrorism is incompatible with Christianity. The definition of terrorism is any form of terror used to drive people away from Christianity, whether it be driving them into Marxism, Islamism, or other form of despair.

    “There is no way that there are people out there that believe these things. This is a satire website, right? It has to be.”

    No.

    “No one would allow someone into office who wants to destroy the Statue of Liberty. To destroy the greatest symbol of freedom in the WORLD would be a grievous act of terrorism–even more so than the WTC. Even if it’s our own president who destroys it, he would be impeached.”

    Only to a liberal would defending American morality constitute an impeachable offense.

    “Lady Liberty is iconic, and stands for what America used to be. She used to welcome people with open arms, now she’s beating people off with a baseball bat screaming, “YOU WANT A PIECE OF ME?!”

    Really? I wasn’t aware they’d changed the statue.

    “No, but seriously…you guys can’t seriously believe that. I’d hate to see this country (or PLANET, for that matter) if people like this had their way.”

    Why do you hate Christianity?

    I’d respond to you too, Austin, but I don’t even understand your post.

    Comment by Sisyphus — January 17, 2008 @ 10:28 pm | Reply

    • “Terrorism is incompatible with Christianity. The definition of terrorism is any form of terror used to drive people away from Christianity, whether it be driving them into Marxism, Islamism, or other form of despair.”

      No, actually. Terrorism is using fear as a weapon, much like America and its drone strikes. And what about your ‘god’ throwing his threats of eternal damnation at us?

      Comment by Cade Stein — October 24, 2013 @ 11:22 am | Reply

  27. “The definition of terrorism is any form of terror used to drive people away from Christianity”
    Lies.
    “Really? I wasn’t aware they’d changed the statue.”
    What you are not aware of could fill a book. In fact, they have several million books filled with what you’re not aware of. That’s the problem.
    “Why do you hate Christianity?”
    Because, frankly, you version of Christianity sucks. All you do is find something to be angry about, then rant about it with no regard to rational thinking or the truth. You pray for the deaths and torture of people both innocent and guilty, and have no interest in learning new things, preferring to live in the Dark Ages.
    So that’s why we hate Christianity, Sisyphus. People like you who make it look bad.

    Comment by Elephant Bones — January 17, 2008 @ 10:56 pm | Reply

  28. You’re right. It’s an indecent statue, an enticement to immigration, and a symbol of that cesspit of Vice called New York City.

    I see some people cannot face truth. Truth is not comfortable. Truth does not gratify libertine impulses. The TRUTH is not Godless biology, pederast physics or filthy heathen chemistry.

    “Satire,” they call, it, as though the TRUTH had anything in common with hideous pagan sexually-inflamed goat-men.

    Comment by praying hands — January 18, 2008 @ 12:29 am | Reply

  29. ““Satire,” they call, it, as though the TRUTH had anything in common with hideous pagan sexually-inflamed goat-men.”
    Lol wut.

    Comment by Elephant Bones — January 18, 2008 @ 12:31 am | Reply

  30. “At least those are Presidents. But, I see your point. I’m more ambivalent on that one, since those are our leaders and most of the ones depicted were good ones. Still, I could be swayed either way. One battle at a time.”

    In b4 you realize that those presidents were some of the most liberal leaders out there, amirite? I’d expect you to at least ask that Lincoln, Roosevelt, and Jefferson be removed. Jefferson and Roosevelt weren’t even the Protestant conservative types you b4beaners love to give oral favors to. Hell, Jefferson doesn’t even qualify as “Christian”, since Deism is simply the belief that a higher power exists, but that it essentially doesn’t do anything.

    P.S.: Jesus was black, lulz.

    Comment by Dio Brando — January 18, 2008 @ 3:33 am | Reply

  31. “So that’s why we hate Christianity, Sisyphus. People like you who make it look bad.”

    I will pray for you, EB. You sadden me.

    “I see some people cannot face truth. Truth is not comfortable. Truth does not gratify libertine impulses. The TRUTH is not Godless biology, pederast physics or filthy heathen chemistry. ”

    Amen! Then again, what do you expect from people who’ve been indoctrinated since birth to believe that there is no God, and that the Sun and those tiny little stars are more important than the very Earth on which they stand?

    “In b4 you realize that those presidents were some of the most liberal leaders out there, amirite? I’d expect you to at least ask that Lincoln, Roosevelt, and Jefferson be removed. Jefferson and Roosevelt weren’t even the Protestant conservative types you b4beaners love to give oral favors to. Hell, Jefferson doesn’t even qualify as “Christian”, since Deism is simply the belief that a higher power exists, but that it essentially doesn’t do anything.”

    You do have a point there. I’d forgotten Roosevelt was on there. Lincoln wasn’t a liberal, though.

    If we can sand-blast Jefferson and Roosevelt off there, I’m content. We maybe should remove Lincoln, too, but I’m open to debate on this one.

    Comment by Sisyphus — January 18, 2008 @ 6:44 am | Reply

  32. [...] None, some, or all?  Is the entire endeavour an anti-Christian graven image on par with the Statue of “Liberty?”  [...]

    Pingback by Open Mount Rushmore Thread « Blogs 4 Brownback — January 18, 2008 @ 6:49 am | Reply

  33. It is imperative that we remove graven images visible in common public life as well. First among these is Bob’s “Big Boy”, a widespread symbol of gluttony visible throughout the nation. Thereafter, a list of offenders should be compiled, with each slowly removed. Several effective dynamiting techniques used on idols in Afghanistan by the previous government may prove most effective here.

    Comment by Copernicus — January 18, 2008 @ 8:20 am | Reply

  34. Could we modify the anti-Christian elements out of the Statue of Liberty? Like this church did;
    http://www.thestatueofliberationthroughchrist.org/

    Now that would be something the New Yorkers could use.

    Comment by BJ Tabor — January 18, 2008 @ 10:39 am | Reply

  35. “Now that would be something the New Yorkers could use.”

    True, but the Statue would still be French. Isn’t that a problem?

    Comment by Sisyphus — January 18, 2008 @ 11:00 am | Reply

  36. Post 26.
    My posts are generally comments directed to the author of the post i’m quoteing, be it the orignal post or another comment, so if confused, just look at the post i’m writhing about, and if still confuse, don’t worry. I have never been good at getting my meaning across, so you probaly won’t be the only confuddled person [blushes]

    Comment by Austin — January 18, 2008 @ 11:17 am | Reply

  37. “True, but the Statue would still be French. Isn’t that a problem?”

    Not if we completely rebuild the statue with proper American metals. We can make it out of some nice stainless steel and not that cruddy copper stuff.

    Comment by BJ Tabor — January 18, 2008 @ 11:19 am | Reply

  38. “We can make it out of some nice stainless steel and not that cruddy copper stuff.”
    Well, stainless steel would definitely hold it’s original color longer, but the amount of glare coming from a stainless steel Liberty would be unbearable.

    Comment by Elephant Bones — January 18, 2008 @ 12:14 pm | Reply

  39. “Well, stainless steel would definitely hold it’s original color longer, but the amount of glare coming from a stainless steel Liberty would be unbearable.”

    That would be terrific! Along with the 40ft gold cross it would be like God’s own flash light shining in the sinner’s face. Perfect for New York City. Those people desperately need the Lord so much.

    Comment by BJ Tabor — January 18, 2008 @ 12:46 pm | Reply

  40. 25. Thanks. But the thing is, I don’t care what they have to say about my name. Also, I seriously doubt they know who Anubis even is.

    26. I don’t hate Christianity. But, people like you tend to disgust me. It’s either believe the way you do, or they’re suddenly labelled as Pagans and threatened with the lake of fire. I’m serious–if people like you had their way with politics and whatnot, then I’d hate to see what this Earth would be like.

    Comment by Anubis — January 18, 2008 @ 12:56 pm | Reply

  41. “My posts are generally comments directed to the author of the post i’m quoteing, be it the orignal post or another comment, so if confused, just look at the post i’m writhing about, and if still confuse, don’t worry. I have never been good at getting my meaning across, so you probaly won’t be the only confuddled person [blushes]”

    Sorry. It’s probably my fault, too, you know. I often have problems understanding where liberals are coming from on things.

    “Not if we completely rebuild the statue with proper American metals. We can make it out of some nice stainless steel and not that cruddy copper stuff.”

    There’s a thought. But if we’re completely rebuilding the statue, why not just make one of Jesus or the Virgin Mary?

    “Well, stainless steel would definitely hold it’s original color longer, but the amount of glare coming from a stainless steel Liberty would be unbearable.”

    Then we’ll paint it.

    “25. Thanks. But the thing is, I don’t care what they have to say about my name. Also, I seriously doubt they know who Anubis even is.
    Some Pagan gobbledygook, no doubt.

    “26. I don’t hate Christianity. But, people like you tend to disgust me. It’s either believe the way you do, or they’re suddenly labelled as Pagans and threatened with the lake of fire. I’m serious–if people like you had their way with politics and whatnot, then I’d hate to see what this Earth would be like.”

    Paradise.

    Comment by Sisyphus — January 18, 2008 @ 1:17 pm | Reply

  42. It’d still be the Dark Ages.

    Comment by Elephant Bones — January 18, 2008 @ 1:19 pm | Reply

  43. “Some Pagan gobbledygook, no doubt.”

    Wow. You are so uneducated. No, really…go read a book other than the Bible. You might learn something interesting.

    “Paradise.”

    NO, it would not be paradise. You fundies are the vast minority of people. To try and change the world into something you would call “Paradise”, there would be revolt and protests and anyone you would select as a leader would likely either get impeached or assasinated.

    Comment by Anubis — January 18, 2008 @ 1:22 pm | Reply

  44. “Then we’ll paint it.”
    I’d prefer an eyesore over an environmental hazard. Why do they not paint outdoor statues? Because they don’t make a paint strong enough to both survive the elements and not poison something.

    Comment by Elephant Bones — January 18, 2008 @ 1:27 pm | Reply

  45. “Some Pagan gobbledygook, no doubt.”
    Someone failed Ancient History.

    Comment by Elephant Bones — January 18, 2008 @ 1:28 pm | Reply

  46. “It’d still be the Dark Ages.”

    The Light Ages, as far as I’m concerned. Christianity’s flame has never burned brighter.

    “Wow. You are so uneducated. No, really…go read a book other than the Bible. You might learn something interesting.”

    Paganism is of no interest to me.

    “NO, it would not be paradise. You fundies are the vast minority of people. To try and change the world into something you would call “Paradise”, there would be revolt and protests and anyone you would select as a leader would likely either get impeached or assasinated.”

    Then there would be blood. The heathens will repent, or pay for their iniquities. But Paradise there will be, with them or without them.

    “I’d prefer an eyesore over an environmental hazard. Why do they not paint outdoor statues? Because they don’t make a paint strong enough to both survive the elements and not poison something.”

    Hey, you were the one complaining. I merely offered a solution. We could always leave the steel gleaming, as BJ suggested.

    “Someone failed Ancient History.”

    Anubis is some Egyptian garbage. I don’t need to know, so I don’t bother to remember. So what?

    Comment by Sisyphus — January 18, 2008 @ 2:56 pm | Reply

  47. Well, if your so-called Paradise would ever become reality, I for one would not repent for my so-called “sins”. If I should be damned forever, then I will accept my fate with grace. I believe what I believe–and no one will ever force me to take up another religion besides my own.

    You’re ignorant to other religions, ancient or otherwise, because I think you fear them. You’re afraid that someone is going to come and shatter your “perfect” views.

    Comment by Anubis — January 18, 2008 @ 3:22 pm | Reply

  48. “The Light Ages, as far as I’m concerned. Christianity’s flame has never burned brighter.”
    Aaaaaand there’s the answer I was afraid you were going to give. Why not bring back the plague while you’re at it? Maybe we could reintroduce the feudal system; Bush has done a good job of trying.

    Comment by Elephant Bones — January 18, 2008 @ 3:32 pm | Reply

  49. “You’re ignorant to other religions, ancient or otherwise, because I think you fear them. You’re afraid that someone is going to come and shatter your “perfect” views.”

    Why would we need to understand other religions? They’re false. What possible point would be to learning lies some mad man made up on a whim? We Christians have The Bible to get away from that kind of nonsense.

    Comment by BJ Tabor — January 18, 2008 @ 5:26 pm | Reply

    • Christianity is as false as any religion.

      Comment by Cade Stein — October 24, 2013 @ 11:27 am | Reply

  50. And there are others that view your religion as being nonsense, and being made up by a mad man. You seem to forget that it was man that made the Bible, translated by mostly vague signs from god.
    Besides, most of the miracles were more than likely drug trips. It’s been proven that there was some sort of chemicle or bacteria or something on their grain called Ergot. When it was made into bread, it could cause hallucinations. It gave the appearance of a miracle, when they were really hyped up on Ergot.

    Besides, how do you not know that your “god” is really just another version of someone else’s god?
    So, it could be that by calling someone else’s beliefs nonsense, that you’re really calling your own belief system nonsense.
    Ever think about that?

    Comment by Anubis — January 18, 2008 @ 7:11 pm | Reply

  51. [...] None, some, or all? Is the entire endeavour an anti-Christian graven image on par with the Statue of “Liberty?” Discuss.Updated with picture of new and improved Mount [...]

    Pingback by Open Mount Rushmore Thread « Blogs 4 Huckabee — January 18, 2008 @ 7:38 pm | Reply

  52. “We Christians have The Bible to get away from that kind of nonsense.”
    lemme fix that quote for ya
    “We Christians have The Bible to hide behind.”

    Comment by Elephant Bones — January 18, 2008 @ 8:43 pm | Reply

  53. Talk of destroying American landmarks is terrorist chatter.

    How come BJ does not have to embed links like everyone else?

    Comment by SisyphusLikesPsycheoutsKitty — January 19, 2008 @ 4:21 am | Reply

  54. BJ does not have to embed links since his brain is embedded in concrete….hence all the bull he writes.

    As far as the topic….there is no president Huckabee, neither a president Brownback.
    Anyway….blow up the F@@king statue, Sixsixsixiyphus, and tell your shrinks at Gitmo that you are not a terrorist then.
    Have fun there, Lindsay Lohan will play a benefit concert for you there.

    Comment by MoxoM — January 19, 2008 @ 10:43 am | Reply

  55. The Statue of Treachery is pure evil. Kudos to you for writing this important post, Sisyphus. The sooner we’ve sunk this abomination into the New York Bay, the better for America.

    No wonder God has been smiting us so much lately.

    Comment by Marcia P. — January 19, 2008 @ 1:26 pm | Reply

  56. Oh cool…..it’s Marty the tranny again

    Comment by MoxoM — January 19, 2008 @ 3:22 pm | Reply

  57. “That would be terrific! Along with the 40ft gold cross it would be like God’s own flash light shining in the sinner’s face. Perfect for New York City. Those people desperately need the Lord so much.”

    Ahahaha, you DO realize this is the exact shit Jesus rebelled against, right? His entire movement was based on the gross materialization and greed of the Temples. The man walked poor for good reason– Judaism in that era had lost its soul.

    Ironically, humans like you have lost their souls.

    “No wonder God has been smiting us so much lately.”

    No, Marsha, that’s because religious zealots like you have sunk us all into Hell. Thank you very much, I felt we needed more flames from the depths of Hell– looks great on the lawn.

    Comment by Dio Brando — January 19, 2008 @ 7:17 pm | Reply

  58. Anubis, go mourn Osiris like you should be doing. Shouldn’t you be opposed to Set, the killer of Osiris and the ‘god’ of animals (pre-Darwinism)? I do think that, if you are used properly, we can kill the Darwinists once and for all.

    Lincoln’s face does need to be removed. Many good Christians hate him, and he’s a Unitarian poet, so there is no reason to keep him around. In fact, we should just change all 4 faces to Barry Goldwater, Ronald Reagan, Phyllis Schlafly (to give women a voice, more than they deserve), and Rambo. Christ is too good to appear on some ugly rock.

    Once we destroy the Statue of Liberty, millions of people will be saying, “Mistah Kurtz _ he dead!” A glorious day, and one I will not soon forget.

    Comment by bobcorker — January 19, 2008 @ 8:40 pm | Reply

  59. “Lincoln’s face does need to be removed. Many good Christians hate him, and he’s a Unitarian poet, so there is no reason to keep him around. In fact, we should just change all 4 faces to Barry Goldwater, Ronald Reagan, Phyllis Schlafly (to give women a voice, more than they deserve), and Rambo. Christ is too good to appear on some ugly rock.”

    Rambo’s a fictional character, though. Senator Brownback’s face belongs up there somewhere, that’s for sure.

    “Once we destroy the Statue of Liberty, millions of people will be saying, “Mistah Kurtz _ he dead!” A glorious day, and one I will not soon forget.”

    Amen! I think we can all agree on that one, at least.

    Comment by Sisyphus — January 19, 2008 @ 8:44 pm | Reply

  60. “Rambo’s a fictional character, though. Senator Brownback’s face belongs up there somewhere, that’s for sure.”

    Fictional or not, he’s an excellent symbol against Leftism, Communism, and Pacifism, however, so his face will demoralize the liberals and intimidate anyone about to cross over to their side. Brownback should have the biggest face, and Mike Huckabee should have the 2nd biggest, I forgot about that. Mount Rushmore is a huge rock last I checked, so we should basically add everyone that stands for conservatism.

    I’m liking the idea of a huge Christ statue standing right behind Mt. Rush overlooking the people we put on there, though. THAT will be beautiful!

    Comment by bobcorker — January 19, 2008 @ 9:06 pm | Reply

  61. I missed Bob’s posts. They are an endless source of lulz and fail.

    Comment by Elephant Bones — January 19, 2008 @ 11:54 pm | Reply

  62. they should put Brownback’s ass on Rushmore, together with KKKorKKKer’s face, so people can see that there is no difference between them.

    Comment by MoxoM — January 20, 2008 @ 9:43 am | Reply

  63. the kaka remains the same

    Comment by MoxoM — January 20, 2008 @ 9:43 am | Reply

  64. “I’m liking the idea of a huge Christ statue standing right behind Mt. Rush overlooking the people we put on there, though. THAT will be beautiful!”

    That’s a beautiful idea Bob, simply beautiful.

    Since Rushmore is a big rock maybe we can extend the carvings to show these American heroes kneeling in prayer?

    Comment by BJ Tabor — January 20, 2008 @ 12:38 pm | Reply

  65. “Since Rushmore is a big rock maybe we can extend the carvings to show these American heroes kneeling in prayer?”
    Suddenly they’re heroes? Hypocrites. Besides, with the amount of space left on the mountain, they’d end up looking like bobbleheads.

    Comment by Elephant Bones — January 20, 2008 @ 1:07 pm | Reply

  66. “Anubis, go mourn Osiris like you should be doing. Shouldn’t you be opposed to Set, the killer of Osiris and the ‘god’ of animals (pre-Darwinism)? I do think that, if you are used properly, we can kill the Darwinists once and for all.”

    If I am used properly? What is that supposed to mean?

    Comment by Anubis — January 21, 2008 @ 11:33 pm | Reply

  67. “I’m liking the idea of a huge Christ statue standing right behind Mt. Rush overlooking the people we put on there, though. THAT will be beautiful!”

    Wow, isn’t that mocking Jesus? I could swear that making a mockery of Jesus and what he suffered for by making giant statues all over the country was serious offense material.

    Comment by Dio Brando — January 21, 2008 @ 11:34 pm | Reply

  68. “I’m liking the idea of a huge Christ statue standing right behind Mt. Rush overlooking the people we put on there, though.”
    That’s a graven image. Kind of the reason you started this thread.

    Comment by Elephant Bones — January 22, 2008 @ 12:15 am | Reply

  69. “Since Rushmore is a big rock maybe we can extend the carvings to show these American heroes kneeling in prayer?”

    That’s an excellent idea, BJ!

    Are there any mountains nearby on which we could place Rambo? I don’t mind putting fictional characters up, but I don’t want them overshadowing the real thing.

    Comment by Sisyphus — January 22, 2008 @ 4:47 pm | Reply

  70. There’s plenty of wasteland in South Dakota, Sisyphus. If nothing else, we can evict liberals out of their homes, build a monument out of their bricks and wood, and start carving in faces. South Dakota already wants that to happen, which is good.

    I’m starting to think Sam Brownback is too good to be seen as equal to the other conservatives. Other rocks can be devoted to other conservatives, but Brownback gets all of Rushmore. As a bonus, I think giving him a sword and having him plow it through Hillary Clinton would be gorgeous.

    Comment by bobcorker — January 22, 2008 @ 4:52 pm | Reply

  71. “As a bonus, I think giving him a sword and having him plow it through Hillary Clinton would be gorgeous.”
    May as well make him plowing through the Constitution with that sword; it’s what’s going to happen if he’s elected.

    Comment by Elephant Bones — January 22, 2008 @ 5:01 pm | Reply

  72. “May as well make him plowing through the Constitution with that sword; it’s what’s going to happen if he’s elected”

    The Constitution is a fraud. It was written by the Frenchified pervert Thomas Jefferson, and heavily modified by the other Frenchified pervert Benjamin Franklin. What more evidence do you need?

    Comment by bobcorker — January 22, 2008 @ 5:05 pm | Reply

  73. “The Constitution is a fraud. It was written by the Frenchified pervert Thomas Jefferson, and heavily modified by the other Frenchified pervert Benjamin Franklin. What more evidence do you need?”

    Considering how you rub yourself off to the 2nd Amendment, one would think you’d love it for at least that.

    Go back to shooting nigras, Bob.

    Comment by Dio Brando — January 22, 2008 @ 5:29 pm | Reply

  74. “Typical leftist. When confronted with irrefutable evidence, claim your adversary is being dishonest.”

    Irrefutable evidence, Sisy? I’m guessing this must be some new meaning of irrefutable evidence that we were previously unaware of. I think you’re just pissed off because you can’t see what she’s wearing under all those robes.

    Comment by FadedRose — January 22, 2008 @ 5:58 pm | Reply

  75. “Considering how you rub yourself off to the 2nd Amendment, one would think you’d love it for at least that.”

    That one was placed by Patrick Henry, the child of the glorious party, the Anti-Federalists (once Jefferson left). Since the 18th Amendment was never properly ratified, how can you trust the rest.

    “Go back to shooting nigras, Bob.”

    Why don’t you talk to your Leftist buddy, wpower. You both agree on many, many things, plus you both use the despicable n-word. How can you even have the audacity to SAY it, you pathetic vermin? I also wrote an article on why the KKK is left wing. So, Helioleftist, do you enjoy manipulating poor African-Americans? You disgust me.

    Comment by bobcorker — January 22, 2008 @ 6:09 pm | Reply

  76. “If I am used properly? What is that supposed to mean?”

    We can show that even in ancient days in false religions, good will triumph over evil, just as Christians will triumph over Darwinists. Depicting you and like 250 Anubites fighting Set and his platypii will surely win people over to the Christian side, whether you want them to or not.

    Comment by bobcorker — January 22, 2008 @ 7:54 pm | Reply

  77. “There’s plenty of wasteland in South Dakota, Sisyphus. If nothing else, we can evict liberals out of their homes, build a monument out of their bricks and wood, and start carving in faces. South Dakota already wants that to happen, which is good.”

    This is a pious state.

    “I’m starting to think Sam Brownback is too good to be seen as equal to the other conservatives. Other rocks can be devoted to other conservatives, but Brownback gets all of Rushmore. As a bonus, I think giving him a sword and having him plow it through Hillary Clinton would be gorgeous.”

    She doesn’t merit a likeness, save in her true form- a fearsome serpent.

    “Irrefutable evidence, Sisy? I’m guessing this must be some new meaning of irrefutable evidence that we were previously unaware of. I think you’re just pissed off because you can’t see what she’s wearing under all those robes.”

    She’s French. I’m quite sure I don’t want to know.

    Comment by Sisyphus — January 22, 2008 @ 8:18 pm | Reply

  78. “Depicting you and like 250 Anubites fighting Set and his platypii will surely win people over to the Christian side, whether you want them to or not.”
    You do understand that’s not the real Anubis, right? Just like I’m not actually a skeleton.
    “What more evidence do you need?”
    How about real evidence?
    “How can you even have the audacity to SAY it, you pathetic vermin?”
    You mean nigger? It’s just a word. The only reason it has power is because we give it power. You pretend to be some noble guardian of the African Americans, but you only do that because you feel superior to them. I don’t give them any special treatment because they’re not entitled to it. Mollycoddling an entire race is not a sign of moral fiber, it’s a mark of arrogance. You make me sick.

    Comment by Elephant Bones — January 22, 2008 @ 8:27 pm | Reply

  79. “We can show that even in ancient days in false religions, good will triumph over evil, just as Christians will triumph over Darwinists. Depicting you and like 250 Anubites fighting Set and his platypii will surely win people over to the Christian side, whether you want them to or not.”

    Set was never accompinied by platypii, for one thing. Another is that, in a strange sort of way, you are accepting that there are other Gods besides your own.
    Now, would your other fundie-friends like the fact that you’re depicting a jackal-headed god accompanied by undead minions for your god? Having another god fight your battles for you?

    Comment by Anubis — January 23, 2008 @ 12:11 am | Reply

  80. “Why don’t you talk to your Leftist buddy, wpower. You both agree on many, many things, plus you both use the despicable n-word. How can you even have the audacity to SAY it, you pathetic vermin? I also wrote an article on why the KKK is left wing. So, Helioleftist, do you enjoy manipulating poor African-Americans? You disgust me.”

    Hahaha, nothing beats a gun-toting white supremacist pretending to act offended at a fallen-by-the-wayside variant of the “n-word”.

    Needless to say, I’ve just thought of the perfect way to execute you! …You better do something about these knives, Cork-head!

    Comment by Dio Brando — January 23, 2008 @ 4:46 am | Reply

  81. “She’s French. I’m quite sure I don’t want to know.”

    Sorry about that, I forgot, the French is on your extensive “people we must nuke” list. So who among you is NOT a sadistic little bastard?
    And please don’t say Corker or McPain, those two laughable little twits are the most sadistic little things I’ve ever met. Next to you of course, you want to start a war with harmless little animals, now THAT’S SADISTIC.

    Comment by FadedRose — January 23, 2008 @ 6:05 am | Reply

  82. “If it wasn’t for the wisdom on this site, I think I would have to bang my head into walls and pull my fingernails out with my teeth in order to stay sane in this demon-besotted nightmare.

    Comment by Marty McPain — January 16, 2008 @ ”

    Why don’t you just go ahead and do that Marty, and if you bleed to death don’t worry about it, you will not be missed.

    Comment by FadedRose — January 23, 2008 @ 6:07 am | Reply

  83. These liberals know no shame. Any black person reading this thread should be appalled by them.

    NOW can we kill these lunatics?

    Comment by Marcia P. — January 23, 2008 @ 10:33 am | Reply

  84. “NOW can we kill these lunatics?”
    Yes, we’re killing lunatics, starting with you.

    Comment by Mitch Henderson — January 23, 2008 @ 12:14 pm | Reply

  85. “These liberals know no shame. Any black person reading this thread should be appalled by them.

    NOW can we kill these lunatics?”

    And then Marcia was a blacks.

    Comment by Dio Brando — January 23, 2008 @ 2:21 pm | Reply

  86. No Marcia, you ARE the lunatics.

    Comment by Elephant Bones — January 23, 2008 @ 3:16 pm | Reply

  87. You kooks leave Marcia alone. I won’t say I always agree with her, she’s a bit more conservative than I am. But she’s one of the sanest people around here. I only wish she’d post more often.

    Comment by Sisyphus — January 23, 2008 @ 3:41 pm | Reply

  88. Considering that liberals post here with names like “SisyphusLikesPsycheoutsKitty”, I think they’ve lost the debate by default. Dio Brando has failed by variations of Godwin’s Law so many times it’s getting annoying rather than funny. I have no idea why Elephant Bones comes to these message boards so much, but he doesn’t seem to like them. What a masochist.

    Comment by Bob_Corker — January 23, 2008 @ 4:29 pm | Reply

  89. “she’s a bit more conservative than I am.”
    Didn’t know that was possible.

    Comment by Elephant Bones — January 23, 2008 @ 4:43 pm | Reply

  90. “NOW can we kill these lunatics?”

    You’re right Sisy, she’s just as sane as you are. KILL KILL KILL KILL KILL KILL KILL KILL.

    Yep, sounds like you and the rest of your murderous little crew.

    Comment by Arn — January 23, 2008 @ 4:50 pm | Reply

  91. “Dio Brando has failed by variations of Godwin’s Law so many times it’s getting annoying rather than funny.”

    Not once have I brought up Nazis in an unrelated topic(this comment doesn’t count). Ooooooh, learn to read what it means, moron.

    “I won’t say I always agree with her, she’s a bit more conservative than I am.”

    YOU’VE CREATED A conservative PARADOX!

    Comment by Dio Brando — January 24, 2008 @ 1:29 am | Reply

  92. “Dio Brando has failed by variations of Godwin’s Law”

    Referring to conservatives as ‘gun-toting rednecks’, which you are at least implying, amounts to the same thing. Ooooooh, learn to read what it means, whiny liberal.

    Comment by bobcorker — January 24, 2008 @ 3:50 pm | Reply

  93. Ooooooh, learn to read what it means, whiny liberal.
    As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one.
    Ooooooh, learn to read what it means, whiny conservative. Also, it’s not breaking Godwin’s Law if your comparison is not an exaggeration.

    Comment by Elephant Bones — January 24, 2008 @ 4:02 pm | Reply

  94. “Also, it’s not breaking Godwin’s Law if your comparison is not an exaggeration.”

    Yea, pulling out ‘nigra’ and going completely off-topic totally isn’t an exaggeration. As for the variation, replace “Nazi” with “Redneck” and he flunked Godwin’s Law head on. You lost, 21% approval rating liberals; get over it. Oh wait, you can’t, because you have egos bigger than Chuck Schumer’s.

    Comment by bobcorker — January 24, 2008 @ 5:23 pm | Reply

  95. “Referring to conservatives as ‘gun-toting rednecks’, which you are at least implying, amounts to the same thing.”

    Hey, guess who Corktard is?

    Audience: “A RACIST GUN-TOTING CONSERVATIVE REDNECK!”

    Man, I love this show.

    P.S.: If I’m failing “variations” of Godwin’s Law, you and the rest of B4B is failing it in spades. The closer you get to calling anyone who doesn’t share the same beliefs as you…you know the rest.

    Comment by Dio Brando — January 25, 2008 @ 10:19 pm | Reply

  96. Wow.

    The Statue of Liberty, also known by her actual title, “Liberty Enlightening the World,” was based on a Roman ideal of what liberty would look like personified. And in case you didn’t know, our country was originally based on the ancient republic of Rome. Washington himself, General of the Continental Army and first President of the United States, wished to be remembered as a second Cincinnatus. Please read your history.

    Also, unless you’re descended entirely from Native Americans (a.k.a. American Indians) YOU are the child of immigrants. Our ancestors came here from Europe, Africa, and Asia in order to start a new life in a land of freedom and opportunity. The United States is, and has always been, a nation of immigrants, and you would do well to remember this.

    Comment by L — January 27, 2008 @ 2:11 pm | Reply

  97. [...] thought I was weird. The blogger wants to destroy the Statue of Liberty because it’s a “graven [...]

    Pingback by Political weirdness.. redundant, but.. | rantbits.com — January 30, 2008 @ 2:23 am | Reply

  98. The Statue of Liberty represents the pagan god Omorka alias Amarka ( “AM” Mother, and “ARKA” Earth.) Mother of the earth…..The mother of the world…..Mother of gods and men.In hebrew her name is Tzalaa. Thalatth is the Chaldean form. See page 305 0f “THE TWO BABYLONS” by Alexander Hislop.

    Comment by kevin moore — February 1, 2008 @ 6:52 pm | Reply

  99. SEE page 305 of “THE TWO BABYLONS” by Alexander Hislop.

    Comment by kevin moore — February 1, 2008 @ 6:56 pm | Reply

  100. I loled. Lovely satire site. If it is not however…wow. Umm GTFO my interwebz dickweed. While ur at it gtfo my country.

    Comment by Doodz — February 6, 2008 @ 1:58 am | Reply

  101. Here I am. I’m not afraid of you.
    You never answered my prayers.
    And now you’re gonna punish me.
    FUCK YOU

    i bet you fucking nazi’s eat meat and hate the woman’s rights movement too.

    Comment by XCANAANX — March 10, 2008 @ 8:04 pm | Reply

  102. Christianity is a cult, and you’ve been sucked in by the lies! FREE YOURSELF!

    Comment by Real Human — April 25, 2008 @ 6:24 pm | Reply

  103. thats ridculous you bunch of freakin weirdos

    Comment by bill — May 5, 2008 @ 2:37 am | Reply

  104. People like you make me proud that i wipe my ass each and everyday with pieces of the bible:P

    Comment by Vorhan — July 11, 2008 @ 1:45 pm | Reply

  105. Do you need your head examined?

    The Statue of Liberty is a symbol of idol worship? I don’t think so! Then again, Liberty Island is closed at night, maybe satanists sneak up onto it at midnight and make their demonic sacrifices in front if it at that time? No wait, maybe people read the inscription “I lift my lamp beside the golden door!” and open the gates of hell next to it and pray to Satan asking for power!

    Get real!

    On top of that, you’re making threats to destroy a national monument! That’s what terrorists do! Some “christian” you are! I think you need to be investigated!

    Not that ANYONE would be STUPID enough to follow your logic! NOWHERE does it say that the Statue of Liberty is an idol for worship! To make an assumption like that, there has to be something wrong with you!

    I’M SORRY YOU LIVE LIKE A LOSER WHERE YOU DON’T HAVE ENOUGH TO DO! I’M SORRY THAT YOU DON’T ASK GOD TO FORGIVE YOU FOR CREATING EVIL IN YOUR MIND! AND I’M SORRY THAT YOU WILL GO TO HELL!!!!!

    Comment by Jimmy — August 13, 2008 @ 4:59 pm | Reply

  106. “I know this is a controversial topic…”

    No, it really isn’t. Controversy really has to have meaningful support on two sides of the issue. Your position is something of an outlier.

    Comment by Edgy DC — November 12, 2009 @ 1:06 pm | Reply

  107. I’m glad to see that others are finally recognizing this evil edifice for what it is:

    Comment by Objective Scrutator — July 14, 2011 @ 11:02 am | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

The Rubric Theme Blog at WordPress.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 37 other followers

%d bloggers like this: