Blogs 4 Brownback

September 19, 2007

Study: Women are Harlots

A Typical HarlotEven the leftards now concede what right-thinking people have known for thousands of years: women are shameless hussies who must be chained up for their own good.

In the study, 854 male and female subjects viewed a series of male head shots that had been digitally altered to exaggerate or minimize masculine traits. The participants then answered questions about how they expected the men in the photos to behave.
Overwhelmingly, participants said those with more masculine features were likely to be risky and competitive and also more apt to fight, challenge bosses, cheat on spouses and put less effort into parenting. Those with more feminine faces were seen as good parents and husbands, hard workers and emotionally supportive mates.
Despite all the negative attributes, when asked who they would choose for a short-term relationship, women still selected the more masculine looking men. Brad and George then would be picks for a brief romance, if not the long haul.

The article then devolves into evolutionary nonsense, but the point it makes is quite valid: women enjoy cheating on their husbands with men they find more attractive.

I don’t think I need to emphasize how revolting this is. The man who raises the children has a cuckoo egg in his nest- the leftist charlatan who seduced his wife has placed it there, and the poor clueless Republican is forced to raise this subhuman monstrosity as if it were his own offspring.

There are excellent reasons why men have always kept their wives in check. Harlotry is an innate facet of the female character. I, for one, would rather die than allow my wife to be seen in public without her chest strapped down. I know that if I allowed her to do so, it would encourage any Democrats in the area to impregnate her. Then I, the unsuspecting rube, would be forced to raise the spawn of demon-worshippers.

I cannot allow such a fate to transpire. That is why my wife is never permitted to leave our residence with an unstrapped chest. Moreover, she is usually locked in the garage when I am at work. She understands the necessity for this, as her moral weakness and emotional nature render her highly susceptible to moonbat deceptions. Such is the punishment of Woman for the sin of Eve. It is a harsh sentence, for a grievous sin. If Eve had not stolen the apple, God would not make women fornicate at will with every passing treefrog satyr.

I think all decent Americans know that President Brownback will do the right thing when it comes to American harlots. Women must know their places, and be kept in them, be it your kitchen, broom closet, cellar, garage, bedroom, or yard leash, your females must be kept from fornicating at all costs. If we could keep liberals away from our women for one single generation, then no new liberals would be born. Then, sin would perish from America forever. That is the dream of all true Americans, and that is what we struggle for.

God bless America. Vote for Brownback for President!

58 Comments »

  1. Females are all harlots and allow any male that happens by to knock them up! OH GOD what if that happens to me one day?!

    “The life cycle of the hard clam includes a pelagic larval phase and relatively sedentary benthic juvenile and adult phases.
    Hard clams begin their adult lives as males, often become females with greater maturity, and require individuals of both sexes for reproduction.
    Clams develop functional male gonads during the first or second year of life.
    Spawning often occurs in “pulses” and may continue for months
    Female fecundity is high, and individuals can release 16 million to 24 million eggs per spawn…
    Eggs and sperm of adults are expelled in the water current and fertilization occurs externally in the water column. “

    Comment by Happy Clam — September 19, 2007 @ 10:31 am | Reply

  2. If there was any doubt whatsoever that this is a parody site, then this article has now alleviated those doubts. ‘Locking the wife in the garage while at work’–oh boy.

    Where’s the eye-rolling smiley?

    Comment by D.W. — September 19, 2007 @ 11:08 am | Reply

  3. Dude, WTF? That article is 9 months old.

    Actually, the leftards make a bit more sense after this. Knowing these harlots are going to cheat on them, they need to keep abortion legal so they’re not forced to raise another man’s sin-child. I, however, prefer if we just don’t let these women leave the house to begin with. That at least restricts their cheating options to various delivery men.

    Comment by Fascinated and Confused — September 19, 2007 @ 11:20 am | Reply

  4. Vote for Ron Paul.

    Comment by Spacebrother — September 19, 2007 @ 1:10 pm | Reply

  5. Um…I’m no Bible expert, but I’m pretty sure the Bible doesn’t tell men to keep their women completely away from the outside world.

    Comment by AutoFire — September 19, 2007 @ 1:27 pm | Reply

  6. This site is mental!

    thumbs up!

    John

    http://boatangdemetriou.wordpress.com/

    Comment by boatangdemetriou — September 19, 2007 @ 1:41 pm | Reply

  7. This is the beginning of the end. After their absence, they’ve moved their focus from seemingly-sane positions on things no sane person would believe to blatantly insane positions. It’s only a matter of time before parodic collapse.

    Comment by Salmo — September 19, 2007 @ 2:55 pm | Reply

  8. Many women are also drawn to swarthy or even brown skinned men. I’m not sure if it’s physical or only the wish to be evil.

    Comment by Enola Tibbets — September 19, 2007 @ 3:25 pm | Reply

  9. “Such is the punishment of Woman for the sin of Eve.” … Women are punished for sin of another woman? No1 should handle any sin they didn’t commit!

    “Women must know their places, and be kept in them, be it your kitchen, broom closet, cellar, garage, bedroom, or yard leash”… They can work in places with women, or a bit separated from men. Not from an extreme to another extreme! “a moderate nation”

    “sin would perish from America forever.” ……..!!!

    Comment by brite — September 19, 2007 @ 4:19 pm | Reply

  10. Isn’t it Islam that suggests that women are not to show themselves in public, and are ordered into complete servitude of their husband?

    Locking your wife in the garage? LOL! This site is getting ridiculous… oh wait, it already crossed that threshold when Sisyphus said that if he can’t understand how a toaster works, then nobody can!

    Vote Brownback!!

    Comment by Adam Nelson — September 19, 2007 @ 7:57 pm | Reply

  11. This article seems to imply that Democrats/Liberals are more attractive than Republicans, since all these married “harlots” are trying to bear their children.

    Yep… Dems are definitely sexier.

    Hilarious post, by the way!

    Comment by Brian — September 19, 2007 @ 7:57 pm | Reply

  12. I like how Sisyphus works a 60 hour shift… within 48 hours. Gee whiz, those neocons really work hard!

    Comment by Adam Nelson — September 19, 2007 @ 8:08 pm | Reply

  13. I wonder how Mrs. Crockpott will react about this!!!
    I hope she agrees, because my inability to control my laughter is unbelievable. And, you are again hypocrites for your obvious approval of her in earlier conversations.

    Comment by Harry Potter — September 20, 2007 @ 11:55 am | Reply

  14. Yeah, these guys are running out of atrocities to perform. It’s hard to follow up an act like “toasters are guesswork, divinely inspired guesswork.”

    LOL!

    Comment by Adam Nelson — September 20, 2007 @ 12:43 pm | Reply

  15. Anyone who denies the truth of this evident fact denies the bible. Those who deny the bible are going straight to hell.

    If men are required by GOD to control their slutty slattern sex-crazed females, then by GOD we will do so! Even if they need to be chained up when not cleaning, cooking or making babies.

    Why can’t you people see how important this is?

    Comment by Happy Clam — September 20, 2007 @ 2:23 pm | Reply

  16. Happy Clam, provide a biblical passage that suggests that toasters were “divinely inspired guesswork”.

    Comment by Adam Nelson — September 20, 2007 @ 8:09 pm | Reply

  17. Adam

    Right here

    Isaiah 45:7 I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the LORD do all these things.

    Electricity is light, darkness is burnt toast. Therefore God created the electric toaster.

    So you have anymore silly questions to pester us with or are you ready to accept Jesus as your personal savior now?

    Comment by BJ Tabor — September 20, 2007 @ 8:55 pm | Reply

  18. Sounds like these Brownback supporters want to turn everybody into Moslems. Only fascists go out of their way to deny certain groups of people rights.

    Don’t vote Brownback.

    Comment by spacebrother — September 20, 2007 @ 9:27 pm | Reply

  19. We are completely different than the Muslims friend; they want to deny Christians the vote. We Christians want to enable the Christian vote vote by stopping attacks upon us from atheists, Satanists, Feminists, and pagans at the ballot box.

    Comment by BJ Tabor — September 21, 2007 @ 4:17 am | Reply

  20. “Electricity is light, darkness is burnt toast. Therefore God created the electric toaster.”

    *sigh*

    “We are completely different than the Muslims friend; they want to deny Christians the vote. We Christians want to enable the Christian vote vote by stopping attacks upon us from atheists, Satanists, Feminists, and pagans at the ballot box.”

    Sounds like YOU’RE the one doing all the attacking, actively trying to insult and discredit people just because they disagree with you. Contrary to what you think in your head, there isn’t some gigantic war between left and right going on. Life isn’t a Saturday morning cartoon.

    Comment by Adam Nelson — September 21, 2007 @ 11:45 am | Reply

  21. I like how Sisyphus works a 60 hour shift… within 48 hours. Gee whiz, those neocons really work hard!”

    Friday night, to Monday morning. I love how liberals are too stupid to do math, and too smug to correct themselves.

    Friday: 3pm-midnight. 9 hours.

    Saturday: midnight-midnight. 24 hours.

    Sunday: midnight-midnight. 24 hours.

    Monday: midnight-7 am. 7 hours.

    24+24+9+7= 48 hours, to a Democrat Canadian, 64 hours to a human being.

    I’m too tired to argue with you about this nonsense, Adam, but you should know better than to try your hand at arithmetic by now.

    Comment by Sisyphus — September 21, 2007 @ 12:03 pm | Reply

  22. 24+24+9+7= 48 hours, to a Democrat Canadian, 64 hours to a human being.

    However, to most of the world, a weekend is Saturday and Sunday. 2 days.
    Day=24 hours
    24 hours x 2 = 48
    60 – 48 = 12

    Your weekend seems to be 12 hours longer than the rest of the world. Seeing as Fridays and Mondays are part of the work week.

    It’s all in how you say it.

    Comment by Curiouser and Curiouser — September 21, 2007 @ 12:29 pm | Reply

  23. sorry, tack on the extra 4 hours, I misread your statement.

    Comment by Curiouser and Curiouser — September 21, 2007 @ 12:29 pm | Reply

  24. A friend of mine knew a guy in Florida who would chain his wife to the stove, no shit. Turns out she got a copy of the key and would sneak out during the day to go over to my friend’s place and smoke pot and stuff. No wonder her man was worried, but apparently she was too dependent on him to actually bother to get up and leave–I guess *someone* has to work to pay for her stash!

    Comment by except... — September 21, 2007 @ 12:41 pm | Reply

  25. Adam @ *sigh*

    Thank you for conceding the point Adam.

    Comment by BJ Tabor — September 21, 2007 @ 1:29 pm | Reply

  26. “Thank you for conceding the point Adam.”

    Hardly. I just find you deluded beyond reason.

    “Friday: 3pm-midnight. 9 hours.

    Saturday: midnight-midnight. 24 hours.

    Sunday: midnight-midnight. 24 hours.

    Monday: midnight-7 am. 7 hours.”

    Last time I checked, a weekend was two days, not four. Though I can understand if facts like that also escape your grasp. So sorry, but not only do you not seem to require sleep, but you can’t even count.

    Comment by Adam Nelson — September 21, 2007 @ 5:51 pm | Reply

  27. We are completely different than the Muslims friend; they want to deny Christians the vote. We Christians want to enable the Christian vote vote by stopping attacks upon us from atheists, Satanists, Feminists, and pagans at the ballot box.

    Comment by BJ Tabor — September 21, 2007 @ 4:17 am

    Ahhh but you are like the Moslems…..

    Moslem fundamentalists blow up buildings they disagree with = Christain Fundamentalists blow up abortion clinics.

    Terrorism is still terrorism regardless of what group practices it.

    Moslem fundies want to turn their countries into religious states = Christain fundies add “Under God” to the Pledge Allegience.

    State sancioned religion is the root of the worlds problems.

    I have nothing against anyones faith and beliefs but find those who force them on others against their will to be tantamount to fascism.

    There’s a reason America’s founding fathers put a seperation of church and state clause in our constitution.

    Comment by spacebrother — September 22, 2007 @ 6:12 am | Reply

  28. Sisyphus, it is not enough to advocate breast-strapping: women are far too awful to let them get away with that act. Woman should hide her face in shame for her sins. What we must do to keep these femi-nazis and burdens of Eve under control is to make women property, under complete control by the husband and church. Indeed, execution should occur as a result of even the slightest misdemeanors, to show how serious we are against Eve’s sin. She should be forced to wear something similar to a burka (not like Islam, however; perhaps the Christian America flag?) and be chained in the depths of a cellar with supertight chains or ropes around her wrists, neck, and ankles anytime she is not used for creating more children.

    Comment by Bob_Corker — September 27, 2007 @ 5:20 pm | Reply

  29. Corker, sounds like you’ve been dumped too many times.

    Comment by Adam Nelson — September 27, 2007 @ 8:04 pm | Reply

  30. No, Adam, I have read Revelation 14:1-4. And 1 Corinthians 7:1. And 1 Corinthians 7:7-8. And also Revelation 7:4-8. These verses say how you get into heaven; why would I break these? I plan to fulfill Matthew 19:11-12 when I grown older, and I hope you do, too.

    Comment by Bob_Corker — September 30, 2007 @ 1:14 pm | Reply

  31. Abortion sends babies to god faster!

    Comment by HAHA — September 30, 2007 @ 2:17 pm | Reply

  32. Haha. You guys are funny. :) Strangely enough, though, I don’t recall Jesus ever saying that the oppression of women is the right thing at all. You guys sure you’re Christian?

    Comment by Rena — September 30, 2007 @ 4:03 pm | Reply

  33. this is why im not a christian they kill in the name of god thinking its right “crusides” they belive they read something that was wrote by the church long time ago to be the absoulte truth well when this world dies and the ones that not stuiped leaves this world u can stay on this dying planet and die just be less dumbos in the world

    Comment by frak god if this is what they turn out to be — September 30, 2007 @ 10:46 pm | Reply

  34. *sigh*
    What a sad article.. The fact that males may cheat as well isn’t worth bringing up?
    And blame Eve? WTF! Can you be more narrowminded?! Without women you wouldn’t be alive!!
    It’s people like you that make me dislike christianity!! Try to live in harmony for once and love your wife, and compare to when you actually make her miserable and steal her fredom! Males aren’t the only ones in this world

    Comment by Hege — October 3, 2007 @ 5:22 am | Reply

  35. “Males aren’t the only ones in this world”

    No, but we are the ones to whom God gave Dominion of it.

    Comment by Sisyphus — October 3, 2007 @ 1:05 pm | Reply

  36. ….we are the ones to whom God gave Dominion of it.

    Comment by Sisyphus — October 3, 2007 @ 1:05 pm

    Now that truly is a nazi statement if I ever heard one. Osama waits for you in his cave Sisyphus. Don’t forget to bring the Vasoline.

    It’s no wonder Jesus hates you.

    Comment by Spacebrother — October 3, 2007 @ 1:19 pm | Reply

  37. I wonder if the smell of woman’s carcass is pleasing to the lord. After all, he does enjoy the smell of bovine, as presented at the very beginning of Leviticus.

    Comment by Bob_Corker — October 3, 2007 @ 2:06 pm | Reply

  38. [...] candidate over the dour, sensible, patriotic Republican. Partially, this is because women are harlots. But more to the point, it is because women tend to be idiots as [...]

    Pingback by Ann Coulter, Right as Usual « Blogs 4 Brownback — October 5, 2007 @ 5:47 am | Reply

  39. Wow. I’m a Republican and I hate you for this. I am a Conservative and I hate you for this. I am a Southern Baptist Christian and I hate you for this. I am male and I hate you for this.

    [Ed Note: Liar.]

    I just had to say that.

    [Ed Note: Shut up, then.]

    Now, I have a question for you. Who did Jesus first appear to? Mary Magdalene.
    Also, did not the Lord say, “Men, honor your wives”? I believe trusting her enough to be in public would fall under honoring her. I don’t think We as men should strip away the freedoms of our wives. After all, they did sign up for a lifetime with you, and are willing to bear your children.

    My condolences to your wife on her terrible choice. There are better. Like Hitler. At least he was willing to suicide with his.

    [Ed Note: You are an ass, imho, iirc.]

    Comment by Fenris — October 5, 2007 @ 9:23 pm | Reply

  40. “Wow. I’m a Republican and I hate you for this. I am a Conservative and I hate you for this. I am a Southern Baptist Christian and I hate you for this. I am male and I hate you for this.

    I just had to say that.

    Now, I have a question for you. Who did Jesus first appear to? Mary Magdalene.
    Also, did not the Lord say, “Men, honor your wives”? I believe trusting her enough to be in public would fall under honoring her. I don’t think We as men should strip away the freedoms of our wives. After all, they did sign up for a lifetime with you, and are willing to bear your children.

    My condolences to your wife on her terrible choice. There are better. Like Hitler. At least he was willing to suicide with his.”

    Comment by Fenris — October 5, 2007 @ 9:23 pm

    You’re correct Fenris. I think any who hates women like the usual suspects in this blog are closet homosexuals. Thats ok though because Jesus hates them regardless of they’re sexual orientation.

    [Ed Note: "They're?"]

    Comment by Spacebrother — October 6, 2007 @ 2:43 pm | Reply

  41. And the satire continues,,, Democrats would want to impregnate your wife but not Republicans. Why, pray tell is this? Could it be because the Republicans are too busy sending nasty emails to little boys, or trying to pick up other men in public restrooms?
    Republicans are not Christian and Democrats are not evil, there are plenty of evil Republicans and plenty of Christian Democrats, the problem is narrowmindedness, and both parties have that in abundance.

    Comment by Arn Lewis — October 6, 2007 @ 4:52 pm | Reply

  42. St. Paul says, “It is good for a man not to defile himself with women.”

    The Bible in no way casts good opinions on women. Only submissive wives should have freedom, and only in terms of tending to the home.

    Also, Fenris, judging by your name, you worship a pagan Norse offspring of Loki. Moonbat.

    Comment by Bob_Corker — October 7, 2007 @ 10:21 am | Reply

  43. Gasp, I have knowledge of Norse Mythology. Way to slap a tag on me because of it.

    Proverbs 7:4-5
    “Say to wisdom, “you are my sister,” and call understanding your kinsman; they will keep you from the wayward wife with her seductive words.” The Lord warns us against an adulterous wife, I believe this. But do you not think that with sufficient judgment and wisdom that men can avoid this fate, and choose a wife we can trust to not “fornicate at will with every passing treefrog satyr.” The Lord did say that “He who finds a wife finds what is good and receives favor from the Lord.” Proverbs 18:22.

    You speak, and doom yourself. “A fool’s lips bring him strife, and his mouth invites a beating.” Proverbs 18:6

    Comment by Fenris — October 7, 2007 @ 10:21 pm | Reply

  44. Fenris, Proverbs 7:4-5 only applies to Christian women. Feminists, atheists, liberals, lesbians, and anything else that Christianity doesn’t condone unfortunately require this. When wives submit to their husbands, it is indeed a beautiful thing. The fact is, however, that these foolish females DO need to be locked up and cast into breeding centers or executed if they are not committed to Jesus Christ. UnChristian men really should, as well, but the females are much more of a problem.

    Considering the Norse are largely Atheists now, Christians should shun their mythology. Greece is a largely Christian country; how about advocating Apollo and Dionysus, instead. We don’t have to submit wholly to theonomy, but we should at least give it respect.

    Once again, if a woman can’t provide a Christian environment for her family, what is her purpose? Her punishment doesn’t call for execution, but we need to put her to use. The answer is a breeding center, since we are constantly losing children through abortion daily.

    Also, oddly, I just received an envelope in the mail explaining I received a pay increase today. Odd to invoke Proverbs 18:6, when you haven’t even read Ephessians yet. What Southern Baptist doesn’t read Ephessians?

    Comment by Bob_Corker — October 7, 2007 @ 10:33 pm | Reply

  45. My name is Jared. I usually don’t give my name out for people on the internet, but I will make an exception. I don’t care if you call me Jared or Fenris, but lets focus on the topic at hand. Besides, I worship God, not Apollo.

    Correct me if I am wrong, but you were refering to the last part of Ephesians 5, yes? You call in Ephesians when you did not fully read what was written. Yes, it says that wives should submit to their husbands. Men were the dominant gender of the era, and women were not. This reduced strife in the household, which was good. But it also asks Husbands to respect their wives as their own bodies. “In this same way, husbands ought to love their wives as their own bodies. He who loves his wife loves himself. After all, no one ever hated his own body, but he feeds and cares for it, just as Christ does the church.” Ephesians 5:28-29. Now, I think that the message is pretty clear. Both men and women have a responsibility to care for each other. Submission should be willing. If a wife submits to you, then that is her way of expressing love to you and the Lord. You in turn have a responsibility to care for your wife, and not disrespect her by locking her in a garage or other such nonsense.

    I would also like to ask you why we should cast women into breeding centers or execute them if they are not committed to the Lord. The same question applies for unchristian men. Did the Lord not tell us to love our enemies? If we kill someone for not being a Christian, then we are losing a person we could save if we had kept them alive. Those who live will continue to have chances to come to Christ, but those who die have run out.

    By the way, congratulations on your pay increase. I am happy for you.

    Comment by Fenris — October 7, 2007 @ 11:10 pm | Reply

  46. Jared, I apologize for my earlier conduct. I tend to think that people posting in distinctly religious names are moonbats. I am too involved in law and selling “As Seen On TV” products to raise a family, unfortunately, although I try to get involved in my youth ministry. Now, what I do is bounce between conservative churches and work with each church’s youth. I see that you are correct in some ways, and that women in some areas are indeed better than men. The Pentecostal church in my area neglected to tell me of this verse. One thing I cannot deny, however, is the literal interpretation of the Mosaic Law. Did Christ not say that he was here to strengthen the Law of the Prophets? I need to be aware of the verse that repudiates the law that requires fathers to sell their daughters into slavery if they can’t pay off the debt.

    As far as blatant sinners, I sadly can’t agree with you. The Lord’s call for execution of blasphemers and homosexuals is clear. Now, if they try to repent of their sins, I will try my hardest to accept them as a Brother in Christ. However, the Law is binding if they pride themselves on the sin. What would Jesus do to those sinners proud of their acts, as many LIBEL-rals are?

    Thanks on the congratulations, best wishes financially to you, too :)

    Comment by Bob_Corker — October 7, 2007 @ 11:57 pm | Reply

  47. Its alright about my name. I have always enjoyed studying different mythologies and religions. But after all of my studies, this is the one I chose. Hmm… Pentecostal… I am not familiar with that one. I would like to learn more, if you would care to share.

    As for the execution of Blasphemers and Homosexuals, I might have an answer that will suffice. I have posted in other areas saying that sometimes the Bible should be taken with a grain of salt. While it is the single best tool for living out our lives in compliance with God, it must also be understood that it was written in context for the time. Laws about eating certain things and the laws about being ceremonially unclean were health risks that needed to have been remedied for a healthy life.

    I’ll give an example. Deuteronomy 23:9-14 talks about hygiene. If we take this literally, there would be a tract of land away from every city where people would go to relieve themselves. At the point in history, the Israelites needed such a place, because they did not have a sewer system to remove the excrement. It says that if someone pees them self during the night, he would go outside of the camp to prevent it from infecting anything in the camp. He would wash himself come evening, and everything would be fine afterwards. Not only does it keep the camp clean, but it is also the first documented potty training in existence. The Lord looks after us in mysterious ways. Some of these ways were designed for the people to keep them clean and healthy at the time, and others, like “Honor your father and Mother in the Lord,” were designed for all to obey.

    As for Homosexuality in particular, there might be a logical answer. Homosexuality produces no offspring. This is fact. The Lord knew this, and decided that there should be no homosexuals among the Israelites to allow them all to produce offspring and continue their lines. When the times were as rough as they were back then, it was detestable to do something that wouldn’t produce any offspring to continue their names. This also applied to incest, to a lesser degree. There was a genealogical hassle God did not need, as well as the increased risk for mutations, no matter how much cleaner the gene pool was back then.

    I am not condoning homosexuality. I am only trying to interpret a logical reason why the Lord would not want homosexuals among the people. Think of it this way, If homosexuality was a normal occurrence, and no one saw anything ethically or societally wrong with it, what might be some reasons for a ban of it? The Israelites had no reason to ban it, but none to condone it either. God gave them a reason.

    For Blasphemers, all we have to do is look at Jesus’ life. He spent all of his time trying to gather those who are lost back to himself. When He ascended to Heaven, He gave us the Great Commission. Matthew 27:18 “Then Jesus came to them and said, “All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me. Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you. And Surely I am with you always, to the very end of the age.”

    I am sorry if I sound cynical, but I don’t think he mentions execution anywhere there. If you decide to bifurcate the world into Christians and Non-Christians, then anyone who isn’t a Christian could be considered a blasphemer. I don’t like where this train of thought is going. I would rather not kill them, and try to save them instead.

    I hope I have been of help. Ultimately, the decision of what to believe rests with you. I just wanted to give you information that may help. If there is anything else you need on the subject, please don’t hesitate to ask.

    Comment by Fenris — October 8, 2007 @ 1:05 am | Reply

  48. Fenris, in general, I would apply execution to the sinners that would not recant their sins, not admit their wrongs. I would love to save them, but sometimes, what they do is not accept Jesus’ word and instead try to spread a false word. You do have a good point about the Mosaic law, however. The ‘shrimp as an abomination’ was repudiated through Acts. Do you think that Ruth and Naomi may have had a homosexual relationship? It is often confusing to know what the Lord wants; perhaps he allows homosexuals in a very, very special occasion. The word of Paul said not to trust them.

    Pentecostals are the charismatics that have gone off and formed their own denomination.

    Comment by Bob_Corker — October 8, 2007 @ 6:14 pm | Reply

  49. I would not be hasty with execution. There is usually a good reason for it, and just because they don’t agree with our religious views is not one of them. As long as they are alive, then there is a chance that they can be saved. I have heard stories that people have accepted Christ while dying in a hospital, only just then realizing what was right. If some man is fated to realize the truth of Jesus Christ just before dying of old age, then who are we to take away that chance? If one breaks the law, then the law will sentence them. If someone defies the Lord, then the Lord will judge them. I don’t think it is our place to do so. That would be some sort of religious Vigilantism.

    If Pentecostals are the charismatics that have gone off and formed their own denomination, then I guess we Southern Baptists are the ones who believe that the Last Supper could have fed the Five Thousand.

    Comment by Fenris — October 8, 2007 @ 9:09 pm | Reply

  50. There is a charismatic movement going on in several other churches, generally people who don’t believe that the charismatics should go off and form their own denomination. Now, I tend to bounce around conservative Presbyterian Churches for an academic approach to my theology, and I will admit I am a Christian Reconstructionist. I also hang around several Baptist churches, mostly Southern Baptist, and will occasionaly stop by at the Pentecostals. Lately I’ve been going there a lot. Kingdom Now is a good theology, but unfortunately the charismatic movement seems a bit silly overall.

    One thing I don’t like about blasphemers is that those that spit in God’s eye tend to spread those thoughts. They need to be stopped from spreading their lies about eternity.

    R.J. Rushdoony and Francis Schaeffer are probably my favorite authors. You make several good points, and you seem to be a loyal man, so I can tolerate SOME people that aren’t quite so orthodox as me (not moonbats, though). I do agree that women are often good at raising families. What Sisyphus was talking about, I think, was largely dealing with the 18-34 age group, where women seem to be getting abortions left and right and hanging around moonbat colleges. The multiple abortion-seeking women, at the very least, need to be strapped up in a cellar somewhere, as they are deliberately ignoring life. Those women that get abortions for the sake of getting abortions DO need to be locked up and hide their faces behind something. But I agree, not all women are bad.

    Could you do me a favor and read “Institutes of Biblical Law” and share your comments with me? That was the book that influenced Schaeffer, the founder of the Christian Right.

    Comment by Bob_Corker — October 9, 2007 @ 3:57 pm | Reply

  51. On women, here is a good article:

    http://www.chalcedon.edu/articles/0205/020509kirk.php

    Comment by Bob_Corker — October 9, 2007 @ 4:29 pm | Reply

  52. I think I will read the book, thanks for the recommendation.

    As for the blasphemers doing what they do, I guess you just need to grin and bear it. If we do not listen to their opinions, then how on earth are we to expect them to listen to ours? I know they are spreading lies about eternity. The only thing we can do is to listen, and show the truth.

    I read the article you posted, and I was agreeing with some of the things he was saying. The problem lies with the women’s and 18 year olds suffrage. I didn’t agree with that too much. Mostly for the reason that I just got my right to vote a year or so ago, and my father encouraged me to vote. I believe that for 18 yr olds, you can raise your children to make intelligent decisions, and have them vote appropriately. Some of the best evenings of my life were spent debating politics with my father. He is a Conservative, and I tend to be a little more moderate. We are both Republican. The reason I became a Republican is because I debated with my dad over anything and everything. If we could agree on something, he would explain in more detail about it to me. If we didn’t agree, we would talk until we could at least reach an understanding. I probably wouldn’t have the ideals I do if I didn’t do this.

    As for women, if you can choose your wife, then would you not choose someone with the same ideals as yourself? I would not want a wife who was to far from my views that it would hurt our relationship. I guess you could just think of it as an extra vote for your candidate, and an extra vote for the Republican side. Where is the harm in that?

    Comment by Fenris — October 9, 2007 @ 8:32 pm | Reply

  53. May the Lord forbid that you should ever have any daughters, for they will surely commit suicide out of despair upon realizing that you want them to be sub-human.

    Comment by Confused — October 20, 2007 @ 1:50 am | Reply

  54. “Um…I’m no Bible expert, but I’m pretty sure the Bible doesn’t tell men to keep their women completely away from the outside world.”

    Yeah, you know what? Maybe to prevent those weak men who are totally dominated by their genitals from raping me, I should start wearing a bur’quah, so that none of my horrible sinful female anatomy is exposed! Death to all who expose their faces, wrists and ankles!

    Seriously, do these people not realize they’re degenerating into Arabism?

    Comment by a TRUE Christian — October 23, 2007 @ 9:07 am | Reply

  55. Also, women should indeed submit to their husbands, but only in the bedroom. Ohterwise, they’ll be stuck kowtowing to B4B editors who enjoy acting out Proverbs 26:11. ;)

    Comment by a TRUE Christian — October 23, 2007 @ 9:10 am | Reply

  56. Racist AND sexist!
    Are you trying for a record?

    Comment by Bob — November 25, 2007 @ 12:21 pm | Reply

  57. i have a friend of mine, a radical feminist, who would gladly argue the crap out of you about this. i wonder if i should show her this site…

    Comment by Elephant Bones — November 26, 2007 @ 3:54 pm | Reply

  58. Your style is really unique in comparison to other folks I’ve read stuff from. I appreciate you for posting when you’ve got the opportunity,
    Guess I’ll just book mark this web site.

    Comment by Nicki — July 21, 2013 @ 3:25 pm | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Theme: Rubric. Get a free blog at WordPress.com

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 38 other followers

%d bloggers like this: