Comments on: Even Intrepid Eighth Graders Can Outargue Darwin

By: A Pissed Off Bob

A Pissed Off Bob — Sat, 08 Dec 2007 01:52:06 +0000

Are you sure you should be on the computer? It isn’t in the bible, so it must be evil!
But seriously. It’s not that hard to mistranslate something, especially something long like the bible. In fact, a man found that the Holy Spirit wasn’t real.
Republicanism isn’t in the bible. America isn’t in the bible. Brownback isn’t in the bible. So they must be EVIL! [/your logic]

By: Logic

Logic — Tue, 14 Aug 2007 09:36:53 +0000

Sisyphus is “wetawded”!

By: hoverfrog

hoverfrog — Sat, 11 Aug 2007 21:29:50 +0000

Please forgive me Sisyphus by I laughed out loud at that last statement.

By: Sisyphus

Sisyphus — Sat, 11 Aug 2007 13:37:42 +0000

Humanists and physicists are brothers in lies. Both serve the Prince of Lies. The fact of the matter is that air resistance, like Humanism, is never once mentioned in the Bible. That nullifies it completely for me.

By: Logic

Logic — Sat, 11 Aug 2007 11:28:49 +0000

To Sisyphus,

I hope you know that heavier things do not fall faster in a vacuum! The only reason lighter things dont fall as fast as heavy thing is because of air resistance. Without the air resistance EVERTHING would fall at the exact same rate. This is basic physics. If you don’t understand this, you shouldn’t be debating anything.

Peace,
Your friendly neighborhood Humanist.

By: Logic

Logic — Sat, 11 Aug 2007 11:23:17 +0000

Wow. This kid didn’t think of anything new. This is a simple chemistry experiment that has been around for a long time. He hasn’t proven anything wrong. Scientists already know about this experiment and it hasn’t posed a problem for geology or evolution at all. If anything this kid should get punished for plagiarism.

“That’s not the point, though. The point is that stalactites can form much more quickly than scientists say they do.”

Um, yeah, the only problem is that he didn’t make “stalactites”.
Definition of Stalactites: a cylinder of calcium carbonate hanging from the roof of a limestone cave.

He didn’t use limestone or calcium both of which define what stalactites are. Therefore the scientists are still right.

By: Sisyphus

Sisyphus — Thu, 14 Jun 2007 17:04:40 +0000

“Is the hill on the topside or the underside of the world disk?”

Underside. Why would Hell be on top?

By: hoverfrog

hoverfrog — Tue, 12 Jun 2007 12:03:42 +0000

By: lietk12

lietk12 — Mon, 04 Jun 2007 21:43:24 +0000

That’s not the point, though. The point is that stalactites can form much more quickly than scientists say they do. The kid couldn’t get calcium carbonate and a cave to prove his point that it happens very quickly, so he used household items instead.
>Calcium Carbonate is CHALK or TUMS. Of course it’s accessible.

By: Paradee

Paradee — Sun, 03 Jun 2007 12:57:59 +0000

I think Sis is spoofing us. Nobody smart enough to breathe can be that stupid.

By: Skeptic

Skeptic — Sat, 02 Jun 2007 20:27:35 +0000

“I think the name Sisiphus is really matching you. Seeing that you still try to bring that rock on the top of the hill…”

Is the hill on the topside or the underside of the world disk?

By: PG

PG — Sat, 02 Jun 2007 20:13:01 +0000

I think the name Sisiphus is really matching you. Seeing that you still try to bring that rock on the top of the hill…

By: Sisyphus

Sisyphus — Fri, 01 Jun 2007 23:08:29 +0000

“The figure Sisyphus was a well-known enemy of the pagan gods.”

Exactly. I view him as an early Christian, of sorts. He certainly was no fan of heathen pantheons.

By: DPS

DPS — Fri, 01 Jun 2007 17:40:14 +0000

Philo @ 96:

The figure Sisyphus was a well-known enemy of the pagan gods.

By: Philo

Philo — Fri, 01 Jun 2007 15:41:27 +0000

I’d just like to point out the extraordinary irony of a young-earth creationist Christian ranting under the name of a character from PAGAN GREEK MYTHOLOGY.